Professional Documents
Culture Documents
149-Research Results-318-1-10-20180215
149-Research Results-318-1-10-20180215
149-Research Results-318-1-10-20180215
1)
Dahler, 2)Serli Marlinawati
1)
Dosen FKIP Universitas Lancang Kuning
2)
Alumnus FKIP Universitas Lancang Kuning
Abstract
Students at the first year students accounting department of SMKN 1 Bandar Seikijang
had problems in writing English business letter. They were facing difficulties type of English
business letter. The Purpose of this research was to find out what kind of difficulties in writing the
English business letter faced by the first year students accounting department of SMKN 1 Bandar
Seikijang. The design of this research was survey. Sample of the research was 23 students at the
first year students accounting department of SMKN 1 Bandar Seikijang. Instrument used was
questionnaire. The questionnaire was about the students’ difficulties in writing the English
business letter. The questionnaire was analyzed by using percentage formulation. The result of
analyzing data that the students’ response toward their difficulties in writing the English business
letter was making up negative response with 71.73%.In conclusion, the students at the first year
students accounting department of SMKN 1 Bandar Seikijang had trouble in studying style of
letter in English business letter.
Table 3.2:
The Sample of the Research
Classroom of the first year
Total
XAK1 XAK1
Tryout 23 23
c. Instrument of the Research was based on the indicator of direct
Instrument was the tool use to strategies concept above.
collect the data from the To get the data from the
respondent of the research. In this questionnaire, the answer provided
research, the researcher used was the multiple choices. It is
questionnaire. refracted into a, b, c, d, and e. the
. design of the answer is Likert-
d. Technique of Collecting Data Scale that is drawn as Strongly
To collect the data, the Agree to Strongly disagree. The
researcher asked the students for answers provided of the
giving their response by filling the questionnaires are presented below:
questionnaire. The questionnaire
Table 3.3
Questionnaire answer
Questionnaires’ answer Score indication
a. Strongly Agree 5
b. Agree 4
c. Neutral 3
d. Disagree 2
e. Strongly Agree 1
Likert Scale
Diagram 4.1
Students’ Questionnaires Recapitulation
50,00%
40,00%
30,00%
20,00% 34,77% 43,47%
39,12% 39,12%
30,43%
10,00% 21,73% 21,73% 17,39%
0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 4,34%
0,00% 8,68%
4,34% 8,68%
Referring to 4.1 above, The last, the students lack of
students not really like English grammar. Grammar is so important
language, it can be reported that especially in writing case. In
there was a significant number of writing, the writer should write in
the students who perceived good grammar especially for
themselves focused on they not business letter that it used in formal
really like English language. There situation. This was one of the big
were 4 students gave the always problem of the students in writing a
answer with the percentage business letter. They could not
17.39%, 1 student answered often comprehend the text well because
with the percentage 4.34%,14 they had less of grammar
students answered sometime with knowledge. So, the content of the
the percentage 60.86%, and 4 problem that should they
students answered rarely with the understood they did not. Also less
percentages 17.39% . It can be of vocabulary was the problem the
concluded that almost all of the students to get the meaning well.
students (60.86%) had a neutral Based on the result, the negative
perception of students not really comment was the most high
like English language. percentage that gotten by the
b. Discussion students. it proved that, the
During the process of taking students had problem in writing
the data. The students got some business letter.
hindrances in writing a business Referring to the result of this
letter. Naturally, writing a business research that students will
letter the writer should takes understand the business letter if the
attention to every single teacher gives the materials by using
components. Based on the something that can be liked such as
identification that researcher picture, it can be occurred because
compilated. First, the students did the picture has several functions
not familiar with the style of that help students to interact with
writing in English Business letter. the teachers’ explanation of
It proved that the students could business letter. It supported by
not placed every components in Gartside (1981: 15) the business
business letter in right place. For letter is the chief instrument of
example, the students did not know external communication. It is
the place to write the Letter Head, enough for the firm to contact the
The letter Line, and The Receieve customers and make relationship to
well. other companies through letters. In
Second, the students were conclusion, the students had
difficulties of type in English trouble the studying style of letter
business letter. In business letter, it in English business letter
divides into some of types. a)
Letter of Inquiry, b) Answer
Inquiries, c) Purchase Order 5. Conclusion
Letters, d) Sales Letter, e) Letter of Based on the purpose of this
Complain, f) Replies of complain, research waste find out the students’
and g) Request for Payment. difficulties in writing the English
However, the problem of the business letter at the first year students
students were they could not accounting department of SMKN 1
choose wether it was a Letter of Bandar Seikijang and the formulation:
Inquiry of Purchase order letter and “What kind of difficulties in writing the
so on. Also, they did not know the English business letter faced by the
body letter of the business letter first year students accounting
itself. department of SMKN 1 Bandar
Seikijang?”. I has been successfully
answered that the kind of difficulties in Bandar Seikijang was trouble the
writing the English business letter studying style of letter in English
faced by the first year students business letter with percentage 43.47%.
accounting department of SMKN 1
Mavor. W. Ferrier. 1988. English for
6. Referensi Business (Third Edition). London :
Arikunto, Suharsimi, 2009. Pitman Publishing Company.
Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Nurhidayati, 2003. Proposal Program
Rineka Cipta. Study Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Cree, D. Ann and F.W. King. 1986. Fakultas Tarbiyah. Pekanbaru UIN
Englsih Business Letter. Singapore : SUSQA
Longman. Singapore Ltd. Pincas, Anita. 1982. Writing in
Cresswell, W.John.2005.Educational English. London : Macmillan
ReseachPlanning ,Conductin , and Published.
Evaluating Quantitative and Poe, Roy W. 1994. Buku Pedoman
Qualitative Membuat Surat-Surat Bisnis (hand
Research.SecondEdition.USA.Univers book of Business Letter) The
ity of Nebraska-Lincoln. McGraw-Hill. Jakarta: Delaptrasa.
Garside, P. Davis. 1969. Testing Print, Mueray. 1987. Curriculum
English as Second Language. New Development & Design. Sidney :
Delhi : Megrow Hill Book Company Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd.
University. Pradana, Sony. 2007. Buku Pedoman
Hornby, A.S. 1990. Oxford Advenced Membuat Surat-Surat Bisnis (hand
learners Dictionary. Aylesburg, Buck. Book nof Business Letter). Eska
1983. Media.
Lyons, Hamp Liz. 1987. Story writing Windshuttle, Keith, 1995. Illustrations
a Course in Written English For and design. McGraw-Hill Book
Academic and Professional Purposes. Company Australia Pty Limited
London : Pitman Publishing Editional
Company.