1) which Thewelfare social 3) 2) Cekeholder ) 2)

3) 2) 1)Criticism Critics
the 3) 2) member function, of some implied providingwhichSocial
societal 3.4.5.3. 4) Criticisms
Business
the owner, For not Theyare Implied from Express in th e Stakeholder
stakeholders.
freedom According
stakeholders,
to selectionsAnother and
wide organisations. This One Stakeholder
stakes it and
Quasi-Contracts:
sprinklers criticism, Ill-practices
affiliations, Employees Customers
againstprovisions above
contract. sort must
owner example, spoken of is society, of agreement and contract are the to AppliedEthics
actually range theory of
express social of onlyknown
wil mentioned the of benefits related Social pertormance of ofact the
who grave benefits legal reason theory
the each as
installed,
liable Contracts: Contracts: or the Social to
allow
if society where theory towere of
Stakeholder corporation
1S in
was a contract
types should
treating such financially should
they as
Similarly, theory
e.g.. important Fiduciary
the
contract a contracts writtenin errors the a provisions. with Contract
to to
Theory some
stakeholders
weird, behind also is group".
plumber
toseeing Contract social members in to the each is criticised interests Ethics
pay, did of as atget business generalisation
get seek the its minorities,is other critiCIsed
contract theory workers some still of as
They They societyother. criticised such
because not him between is form. pollution,
workplace, benefit contract.
benefit assist any as
entities,
society. criticism an reasons Theory Principle: an
(Unit 3)
starts that way per This in authors, organisation. due of
believed Theory asout abstract
stop
installing basically implied italsocomprise as only benefit
operate
to allow the
by This
the
homeless, animals, because
to
the
installing mentioned in the of or Such where theory phase because of behind coporation
hehim two comprise is provides
As the tsocial keeping those which of following
specified exploitation as etc.deprivedthe he theory entity. Jt
was parties, that factors cost-effective for per
other. implied stakeholder it savs
and of form ifthe businesses existence has of trees, fails its
aware and an ' s ocial it the contract improvement, exploitedof who some that
even a of in can
society certain evolved theirstates one criticism
to reasons:
IL
sprinkler
also but inagreement law of customers.of social agreements employees
terrorists,
get etc.
management
tomust
that
refused contracts some an contract'production, increased of function
theory of more
negatively
were establish
theory
ensure
was court agreement are natural products, from link to that children, act
sprinklers
explained.
welfare function entitiesfrom reason genuine, is in
system may
aware other between businesses every even that
the
to between is in is a the
in the it. between are aand relationship survival
pay restrict the between
form. etc., income
not resources,
widespread Hence, term, if traditional business though that
etc.
affected its
it interestsbears
were for that in eyes in inappropriate i.e.,
actually following the subject customers is
the thThere
e should members
the it considered of
his prospects, society
share customers, a
being it. garden one of two justice society it provides by the of
fiduciary
neighbour In tw o are a taking elaborated, concept, to is is between the
party law. parties, contract be manner: compelled a the firm,
installed such parties, basically reduced distribution
ofterm on
an contended
and
condition
a
combination business stakeholders
of In implied extended employees, definition. practically
type to unduedecreased the safeguardingrelationship
wrong
a other
take which of and condition a its in the
was society
it entities which
by of the three any and concept
mistake.cases,actually advantage words, advantage channels,
can the contract that and on rights
may
only is kind. avoided. ethical of Authors as
house types legal besocial are they
society by also etc., inappropriate their to
clearly said will that various of the
courtquasi-contracts way In with also must abiding and stakeholdersS
going by of accountability let
welfare they grounds be wnile stakenolder long-term agent,
of contracts: order and that a loo calied suggested
willmistake. it stated of members known shares theories.
other is business will provide mucn Some
to different to political certain society term. to and
consider get either justify the for as D)
party. do as an
the The are