 MENU

Disciplinary Committee
Home / News

Disciplinary committee means a person or a group of people who are empowered to hear
cases and proceedings involving professional misconduct of an advocate upon a
complaint, revision or suo motu. The disciplinary committee is mainly formed to ensure
that the members of the bar council of India or the bar council of any state are
maintaining professional ethics and standards

S.9 of the Advocates Act empowers the state Bar Councils to constitute one or more
Disciplinary Committees. Each Disciplinary Committee shall consists of 3 members. Two
shall be selected from the members of the Bar Council and one shall be selected from the
Advocates who are having more than 10 years of standing in profession. Among the three
members the senior most in the profession shall act as the chairman of the committee.

Powers : S.42 of the Advocates Act deals with the power of Disciplinary committee. It
provides that the Disciplinary Committee of the State Bar Council shall have the same
powers same like the civil court under the C.P.C. in respect of the following matters.

1. Summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on oath.

2. Requiring discovery and production of any documents.

3. Receiving evidence on a!idavit.

4. Requiring any public record or copies of any record from any court or o!ice.

5. Issuing commissions for the examinations of witness or documents.

The disciplinary committee has no right to require the attendance of the following
persons.

(i) Any presiding o!icer of the court.

(ii) Any o!icer of the revenue court.

A presiding o!icer of a court shall be summoned to attend the proceedings of the

Disciplinary Committee with permission of the High Court and an o!icer of the revenue
court shall be summoned with the permission of the State Govt.

All the proceedings before the Disciplinary Committee of a Bar Council shall be deemed
to a judicial proceedings within the meaning of S.193 & 228 of I.P.C and every such
disciplinary Committee shall be deemed to be a civil court.

Enquiry Procedure: The main function of the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council is
to enquire the complaints of professional misconduct against the Advocates award
suitable

punishments. In the enquiry the following procedures

prescribe under
S.35 of the Advocates Act should be followed.

1. On perusal of the complaint, if the Bar council is satisfied that it is a fit case for enquiry
then the complaint shall be referred for enquiry to the Disciplinary Committee.

2. The Disciplinary Committee shall fix a date for enquiry and shall send notice to the
concerned Advocate and the Advocate General of the State.

3. The Advocate charged with the professional misconduct shall appear in person or
through the Lawyer. Similarly, the Advocate general also appear in person or through a
lawyer.

4. The Disciplinary Committee should complete the enquiry proceedings within one year
from the date of receipt of the complaint. Due to any reason, if the enquiry was not
completed within one year then the complaint should be referred to the Bar Council of
India for its disposal.

5. During the pendency of the enquiry if the term of the Disciplinary Committee comes to
an end then the successor committee shall continue the enquiry.

6. A"er the enquiry due to the lack of majority opinion or otherwise if the Disciplinary
Committee was unable to take a final decision then they shall seek the opinion of the
chairman of the bar council and shall pass the final order following his opinion.

Case Laws:
1. Allahabad Bank Vs. Girish Prasad Verma BCI Tr. Case No. 49/1993

Facts: A complaint was lodged by the Allahabad Bank against its advocate Girish Verma
stating that the advocate was given 52 suits for filing and accordingly paid him the
requisite court fee that was required for the same. The Advocate Girish Verma filed 50 out
of 52 suits and misappropriated the court fees paid to him for the remaining 2 suits.

Held: The disciplinary committee of the Uttar Pradesh Bar Council held that the advocate
had misappropriated the court fee paid to him by the complainant and hence ordered for
striking o! the advocates name from the roll of Uttar Pradesh Bar Council. It further held
that “The legal profession is a noble profession and its members must set an example of
conduct worthy of emulation.”

V. C. Rangadurai Vs. D. Gopalan 1979 SCR (1) 1054

Facts: The advocate Mr. V.C. Rangadurai did not disclose conflicting interest to his client
and kept him in dark. By doing this the advocate deceived his client who had placed his
trust with him. The disciplinary committee found the advocate guilty and suspended him
for a period of six years. The same order was challenged in the Supreme Court.

Held: The Supreme Court of India upheld the order passed by the disciplinary committee
as there was no doubt regarding the advocates misconducts but reduced the punishment
from six years to one year.
Rajendra Pai Vs. Alex Fernandes AIR 2002 SC 1808

Facts: In a land acquisition matter the advocate along with 150 villagers filed a
complaint. The advocate too was an interested party in the class action suit. The matter
was settled and a compensation was given to the complainants. The advocate identified
some claimants in opening a bank account wherein the amount of compensation was
drawn. The said amount was withdrawn upon false identification. The disciplinary
committee held that advocates name from the State roll and Bar Council of India shall be
removed permanently.

Held: The order was then challenged in the Supreme Court wherein the disciplinary
committee’s order was slightly modified. The Supreme Court was of the opinion that the
punishment given was quite disproportionate to the facts and circumstances. It further
stated that “Debarring a person from pursuing his career for his life is an extreme
punishment and calls for caution and circumspection before being passed”. It reduced the
punishment and directed that the advocate shall be suspended for a period of seven
years.

Joginder Singh vs Bar Council Of India AIR 1975 Delhi 192

Facts: In the present matter the advocate was convicted under section 473 of IPC. There
were various other criminal proceedings pending and that the advocate Mr. Joginder
Singh was out on bail. All these facts were concealed by him while entering his name in
the state bar roll. When the advocate filed an application to the Bar Council of India to
transfer his name from U.P. Bar Council to Bar Council of Delhi the Bar Council of India
learnt about such concealment and issued a notice for striking of the advocate’s name.
The disciplinary committee passed an order of barring the advocate from practicing in
any court and removed his name from the roll.

Held: The advocate being aggrieved by the order of the bar council appealed in the Delhi
High Court. The Delhi High Court was of the opinion that there was no interference
required in the said matter as the order passed by the bar council was in accordance with
the evidence, facts and circumstances. Thus, the appeal was rejected and the order of the
disciplinary committee was upheld.

John D’Souza vs Edward Ani 1994 AIR 975

Facts: Mrs. Mary Raymond was a client of the appellant and had got her will dra"ed by
him. She further kept the will in the appellant’s custody itself for execution. Mrs. Mary
Raymond had appointed her husband as the executor of the will but unfortunately her
husband passed away in the year 1974. Hence, she wished to make changes in the
previous will and register a new one. Upon demanding the same, the appellant did not
return the same. Mrs. Mary Raymond sent two letters claiming her previous will back but
both her letters were ignored. Therefore, she was compelled to make an another will with
Mr. George DaCosta. Even Mr. George DaCosta asked the appellant to return his client’s
previous will that was in his custody to which the appellant blatantly denied and said that
he does not have any will with him. Later, a"er Mrs. Mary Raymond’s death her son-in-law
filed a complaint in the State bar council against the advocate i.e. the appellant. The said
complaint was dismissed. An order or revision was obtained by the complainant and the
matter was again placed before the state bar council who again dismissed the complaint
stating there was no misconduct committed by the advocate. Aggrieved by such an order
the complainant filed an appeal before the Bar Council of India who set aside the State
Bar Council’s order and suspended the Advocate for a period of one year.

Held: On being aggrieved by such an order the advocate Mr. John D’Souza filed an appeal
before the Supreme Court of India. A"er hearing the matter in detail, the Supreme Court
was of the opinion that there was no evidence to prove that the will was returned upon
the demands made and that the advocate had no right to withhold the will instead it was
his duty to return the same when asked as the will was placed in his hands with the trust
of his client. Hence, the order of the disciplinary committee of the Bar Council Of India
was upheld.

Conclusion

The advocates play a significant role in the Judicial system. One relies on them
completely by setting their complete trust. It is important for an advocate to discharge it’s
responsibilities in a precise and e!icient manner. Being in the legal profession and a
o!icer of the court, an advocate is required to maintain high standards and uphold the
dignity of the judicial o!ice. Any misconduct of an advocate shall not be tolerable as this
shall a!ect the trust and attitude of the people towards the judicial environment. In order
to ensure that such irresponsible and irrational behaviour does not go unpunished a
disciplinary committee has been set up and given powers to conduct such matters
involving fraud, misconduct and cheating committed by an advocate towards his own
client

 February 14, 2023 by Law Notes in Uncategorized

Previous
Mortgage

Next
Misconduct

0 Comments

 There are no comments yet

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

COMMENT *

NAME *

EMAIL *

WEBSITE
 Save my name, email, and website in
this browser for the next time I
comment.

POST COMMENT

SEARCH

Search

HOME

ABOUT US

INDIAN

LEGAL RESEARCH

LEGAL RESEACH

DOWNLOAD

MOCK TESTS

LAWCET

LEGAL RESEACH

COLLEGES

CONTACT

 FEATURED GALLERY
 LAW Notes
November 22, 2018

MORE GALLERIES

Recent Posts

Legal research and its characteristics

An Empirical Study in Legal Methodology
Research and its kinds

Nature and Scope of Jurisprudence

Legal Research

Recent Comments

Raju on I have paid the Registration Fee, but I do not wish to take the LAWCET-2022 exam due
to unavoidable reasons. Is the Registration Fee Refundable?

 WEATHER INFO
 18° 18°
Ahmedabad Wind |
23°

INDIA 5 kt SE ? Wind |

"
Nagpur
23°
+
Bhubaneshwar
20° -
Mumbai
26°
Visakhapatnam
Hyderabad 25°
27°

Belagavi
24°
18° 18°
Ahmedabad
23° INDIA

Bengaluru
24° Nagpur
23°
Bhubaneshwar Port Blair
20°
Kavaratti
Mumbai
29° Madurai
26°
28°
Visakhapatnam
Hyderabad 25°
27°

Belagavi Kotte
24°
Saturday 10 - 8 PM 27°

f
kt 0 Malé
5 10
Bengaluru 20 30 40 60
29° 24° Port Blair

Kavaratti
29°
Madurai
28°

Kotte
27°

Malé
29°
Archives

February 2024
January 2024
December 2023

November 2023
October 2023

September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
 June 2023

May 2023
April 2023

March 2023
February 2023
January 2023

December 2022
November 2022

October 2022
September 2022
August 2022

July 2022
June 2022

May 2022
April 2022

Categories

Administrative

Administrative Law
Alternative Dispute Resolution

Asministrative Law
B.A LLB
C.P.C

Company Law
Constitutional Law I

Constitutional Law II
Constitutional New Challenges
Constitutional New Challenges

Consumer Protection Act

Contract I

Contract II
Corporate Contract I

Cr.P.C
Culture

Dra"ing Pleading
Environmental Law
Fundamental Right

Hindu Law
Human Rights

I.P.C
Information Technology Law
Intellectual Property Laws

Intellectual Property Laws

interpretation of Statues

judicial process
Jurisprudence
Labour Law I

LAW Justice and Globalisation

LAW Justice and Globalisation

Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments Act

Law of Evidence
Law of Insurance

Law of Insurance
Law of Property

Law of Taxation
Law of Torts
LAwbour LAw I

LAWCET
Legal Language and Legal Writing

Legal pedagogy
legal pedagogy and ICT in education
LLB
LLM

Modern Company Law

 Moot Court
Muslim LAw

Professional Ethics and Professional Accounting system

Psychology
Public International Law
Research and methodology
Schools of Jurisprudence

Sociology
Uncategorized

 NOTICES
TSLAWCET 2023
July 22, 2023

DETAILED NOTIFICATION TSLAWCET

April 27, 2022 in LAWCET

TSLAWCET
April 27, 2022 in LAWCET

MORE NOTICES

 INTERESTING PLACES
Bhaskar Law College
Plot No. 4-188/2, Amdapur X Road, Yenkapally, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy,
Hyderabad, Telangana 500075
in Colleges, Education

MORE LISTINGS

ABOUT LAW NOTES

LAW Notes is a repository of all information related to LAW for Students, Lawyers and to Citizens. It is a student-
run body set up with a view to consolidate and support upcoming students and lawyers with legal opportunities,
legal or law notes, internships, latest news & mock tests.

Join Our Team

 UPCOMING EVENTS

There are no events

 IMPORTANT FORMS
Town Board Applications
November 22, 2018

Temporary Sign Permit Application

November 22, 2018

MORE DOCUMENTS

 QUICK CONTACT

Flat No. 143/2, B.Hills, Hyderabad

TS 500032

Phone: (+91) 9948234572

Whatsapp: (+91) 9959283928
Email: info@lawnotes.co

    
Home T&C Policy

© 2024 LAW Notes