Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E3 Carbon - NL Factory Cluster (Dii)
E3 Carbon - NL Factory Cluster (Dii)
E3 Carbon - NL Factory Cluster (Dii)
in Flushing/Vlissingen (NL)
Investment case overview
Confidential / April 2024
Single “green coal” supplier driving
Tom Sieverts ts@e3carbon.com
the EU steel industry decarbonization Pavel Volichenko pv@e3carbon.com
The green business of “biomass upgrade”
Improved biofuel output/product
Biomass Torrefaction
• semi-standardized plant design
• almost energy neutral 450 Biocarbon price at which large
Biomass input of • extremely low running cost EUR/ton EU-based consumers are ready
various feedstock types to enter in 5-year off-take
agreements already today
2
Biomass torrefaction – tech and product overview
E3 Carbon
Sugarcane Palm EFB
bagasse
torrefaction reactor
3
Superior E3 product properties open more markets
Standard
Wood E3 Green PCI (HV) Coking
torrefied Co-firing rate = market potential
pellets Carbon fossil coal Coal
wood pellets
Excellent calorific (burning)
Total carbon (% db) > 20 > 55 > 70 > 75 > 80 properties and low ash content of
Moisture content (% wt) 8 - 12 <5 <5 >8 >8 E3 Green Carbon guarantee it
extremely high co-firing rate (mix
Lower heating value (MJ/kg) 15 – 18 > 22 > 27 > 25-26 > 27
with regular fossil coal in existing
Ash content (% db) <1 <2 <3 <15 < 12 burners and furnaces).
Volatile matter (% db) < 80 < 70 < 40 25 - 38 20 – 35 According to tests carried out by
Density (kg/l) Bulk 0.6 – 0.7 0.6 – 0.7 0.45 – 0.6 0.7 – 1.1 0.7 – 1.1 ThyssenKrupp (a future customer),
co-firing rate may well reach 50%.
Durability (weight% ar) 97-99 > 98 > 93 > 95 > 95
Whereas co-firing 20% is targeted
Hydrophobic No Yes Yes Yes Yes by the steel industry by 2030.
Biological degradation Yes No No No No This implies easier buy-in from
Grindability Poor Good Good Good Good large customers and much higher
Handling Special Good Good Good Good market potential for E3 product.
4
EU ETS regulation will change the fossil coal market
By 2030 every industrial CO2 emitting will need to buy carbon
Introduction schedule for EU ETS emission allowance certificates for almost 50% of all emission.
carbon emission regulation E.g. this makes fossil coal for steelmakers x3+ more expensive!
48.5% 100%
5
Carbon emissions are likely to get x2 more expensive
Source:
6
Co-firing biocoal is the easiest defossilization strategy for
the steel industry
7
EU steelworks defossilization is a major
new market opportunity
Biocoal
11
Biocoal production unit economics (for 2026)
PCI replacement
biocoal sale price (DDP)
487 EUR/t < 1.0% Utilities
1.1% Real estate
20% 1.3% Equipment maintenance
Other
2.0% Freight to consumer
2.5% Personnel
80%
Feedstock
8%+ Margin
12
Investment phases
EBITDA
Please consult E3 Carbon team for detailed EBITDA margin 7% 25%
comments on financial model and assumptions
PCI coal blend price, CIF ARA ports, EUR per t 200 194 188 183 177 172 167
ETS payment obligation (share of CO2 emission to be off-set with EUA) 0% 0% 3% 5% 10% 23% 49%
EUA certificate price, EUR per t CO2 emission, EUR 65 65 72 79 87 95 105
Biocoal price premium over fossil PCI coal + EUA (CO2 fines) 17% 19% 20% 20% 20% 20% 15%
Biocoal PCI replacement (27 CV, 70%+ total carbon) market price, EUR 450 450 468 484 503 525 526
Combined output by NL Biocoal Factory Cluster, t of biocoal 500 6'242 24'966 49'932 174'762 549'252 898'776
Revenue, EUR k 240 2'871 11'932 24'679 89'672 293'704 482'188
Feedstock purchase cost, EUR k 235 2'445 9'570 18'725 64'079 196'815 322'061
Total operating expenses (excl. feedstock), EUR k 359 755 1'562 2'581 8'614 25'919 41'184
EBITDA, EUR k -354 -329 800 3'373 16'978 70'969 118'942
EBITDA margin 0% -11% 7% 14% 19% 24% 25%
Cash position after investments in equipment, EUR k 0 0 0 0 1'119 63'776 177'819
Cash flow to NL Biocoal Factory Cluster shareholders, EUR mln -3'554 -2'249 -4'323 -11'618 1'119 62'657 114'043
✓ Project arrangement
E3 Carbon GmbH
20%
Hamburg, GER ✓ Management until dedicated team is built
Bulk Terminal Zeeland B.V. ✓ Land, buildings and all port infrastructure (machinery and team)
Vlissingen, NL 20%
✓ Biocoal Plants Operators
15
Appendix
16
E3 Pilot Plant / 1.5kt annual capacity
Designed and produced in partnership with CDS, a 40-year old
innovation leader in industrial drying systems.
17
E3 Pilot Plant / product characteristics*
DB-RE, Rohstoffqualität A n a l y s e n - A t t e s t Ausgabedatum : 17.11.22 7:27
Blatt 1
Stoffschluessel : 1921 00
Stoffname : BIO-Masse
Transportmittel :
Liefergewicht To. :
Probengewicht :
Technologische Analyse Chemische Analyse
* P r o b e d a t e n * mm % SA % Element %
- Lfd. Nummer : 940 Naesse 105 : * 16,32
Asche : 2,98
- Probenummer : DI22074393 (DIL582) P : 0,024
S : < 0,02
- Anf-St./Konto: 3606531960000 Pb : < 0,0005
Zn : 0,0349
- Datum von : 24.10.22 F - : < 0,003
Cl - : 0,015
- Uhrzeit von : C : 71,5
H2 : 4,25
- Datum bis : O : 21,0
N : 0,27
- Uhrzeit bis : H2O (geb) : 9,9
Gluehverl. : 1,46
- Ort : HOV IWF : 28088 (kJ/kg)
HUV IWF : 27214 (kJ/kg)
- Art : Einzelprobe Fl. Ant. : 37,0
NiO : 0,00
: Los Komponenten der Asche
Fe idA : 2,180
: Hand Fremd SiO2 idA : 4,240
TiO2 idA : 0,310
- Anzahl Proben: 1 Al2O3 idA : 1,230
CaO idA : 44,700
- Anzahl Carr. : MgO idA : 9,040
S idA : 5,900
- Kennzeichen : Na2O idA : 0,700
K2O idA : 10,700
- Met. Pruef. : Mn idA : 0,260
P idA : 0,820
- ISO 3271 : NiO idA : 0,006
V2O5 idA : < 0,010
- ISO 556 : Cr idA : < 0,007
WC idA : 2,060
Schüttg. t/m³ : ZrO2 idA : < 0,010
BaO idA : < 0,050
CuO idA : 0,023
SrO idA : 0,029
* P r ü f b e d i n g u n g e n * Co3O4 idA : 0,093
Cr2O3 idA : < 0,010
- Aggregat :
- Art : * produced by one of EU’s
- Belag :
leading steelmakers
- Text: Sonderprobe Holzpellets v.ECoal
unb = unbrauchbar, nb = nicht bestimmbar, kD = keine Dilatation, U = Unsicherheit, na = nicht auswertbar, * = Eingabe per Dialog
18
E3 Carbon relies on partnership with CDS
(legal framework)
Optional % ownership
together with Client
Tech and R&D
• IP (factory design and operations)
• new feedstock process development
Technology License Agreement
• ongoing improvements through real-
(relies on CDS as equipment supplier)
time production data monitoring
Pilot (lab) 1.5kt Factory
19
About CDS
20
Disclaimer
This document contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor
assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based only on current beliefs, expectations and assumptions
regarding the future of the relevant business, future plans and strategies, projections, anticipated events and trends, the
economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to
inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of
E3 Carbon GmbH or their respective affiliates’ control. Actual results and financial conditions may differ materially from
those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Forecasts are based on complex calculations and formulas that
contain substantial subjectivity and no express or implied prediction made should be interpreted as investment advice.
There can be no assurance that market conditions will perform according to any forecast or that the firm will achieve its
objectives or that investors will receive a return of their capital. The projections or other forward looking information
regarding the likelihood of various investment outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment
results and are not guarantees of future investment results. There can be no assurance that unrealised investments will
be realised at the valuations shown or in accordance with any return projections. Actual realised returns depend on,
among other factors, future operating results, the value of the assets and market conditions at the time of disposition,
related transaction costs and the timing and manner of sale, all of which may differ from the assumptions on which the
valuations and projections contained herein are based. Past performance is not indicative of future results and nothing
herein should be deemed a prediction or projection of future outcomes. Some forward looking statements and
assumptions are based on analysis of data prepared by third party reports, which should be analysed on their own
merits. Third party sources referenced are believed to be reliable but the accuracy or completeness of such
information cannot be guaranteed.
21
Contacts