See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/363157611

Short essay on Living (and its Social life)

Article · August 2022

CITATIONS READS

0 150

1 author:

Romain Viguier

37 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Romain Viguier on 31 August 2022.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Romain
Viguier

Short essay on Living (and its Social life)

We can consider our trajectory as a string of life.

Such thin strings, who never meet except in the encounter with the soul mate.

There is also the living space. A space which fundamentally wants to unfold, and which
could do it even in pure good.

Unfortunately, there is The taker. The taker is the obstacle to the pure deployment of living
space. It may be born out of jealousy, is a desire for control by the weaks; weak in the sense
that their life is spent fishing rod in hand, in the not vain effort to regulate too much
brightness of the brights; not vain in the sense that this civilization, perhaps even for very
big times, applies The taker to restrain. Here it is not a question of freedom and its just end,
but of a repressive and ambient virus in what becomes a cohabitation distorded by a
phantom entity, the cloud of the human.
There is also The runner. It is our state. It even occurs for the one who renounces or those
starting a family. We run, take, discover, act with not both feet on the ground, but rather with
breadth and power in our things.

Our chosen environment depends on the total environment, but also on The taker in a more
personal/everyday life level, and on an imposed environment.

In this life, we can note a time of presence. It is a counter of freedom, our activity
according to a modality in the environment. Time is neither saved or gained, but we are in
these times united to it.

There is also the stairs. The stairs is a stable state in our life. The stairs does not have to be
hierarchical and should not be a root of power.
In the living, there is a leak/escape (caused) by isolated gains.

Without going into the body/mind debate, I cannot say if body and mind are perfectly
coupled, or if some minds are ahead of their bodies. Also I have the impression of a
surpassing of the living (evolution by series of successes).

The human has introduced a computerized/Information based system, "morphism" from a

"nature"/environment base.

There seems to be a generational mimetism (with a gradient though).

At the level of society, we must be vigilant in the sense that some of our decisions are
adaptable, that is to say that the reigning state can prosper while seeming to satisfy us. And
then there are our adopted decisions.

To help progress, setting conditions seems beneficial. Setting conditions is the

establishment of a framework made to maximize and bring out progress, where a basic state
fails because not focused/sharpened because of different factors.

At the level of the living, I introduce the term maximum taked. Considering life minus
organization, could the last one be modeled?
Here I am going to talk about the living and time. One can imagine a "temporal
firecracker", a "temporal grenade". This grenade opens time, opens a temporal window.
An interesting thing could be to apply a force like nuclear to the grenade, meaning at a
given temporal window, we put more power into it.

To this temporal opening, I oppose the individual temporal motor (ITM). If at the basis it
is a question of managing the inputs and outputs, the ITM could be a linear application of
the sub-environment in the environment.

One idea for the ITM is to see it in a cycle:

A cycle like:

Slightly more Mathematics, I present here an automaton, the mode of action of an

interface.
There is generation/emergence of "paper sheets" under cadence, randomly pulsating.
We have a continuous but finite frame (segment), therefore 2D projection, of discrete
objects ("paper sheets").
But there is an additional dimension, the 3D depth of the generating process.
The idea is that there is one "paper sheet" read.
The parameter of success read: the most on the surface sheet.
There is continuity of the reading with variation of depth and coordinates.
Remark : digital sheets => can cross each other.
In connection with the automaton, we can imagine 2 hooks (linked and in rotation?,
symmetry) as an application (perforative)

At the individual level, we can have the notion of the intake, seen non as physical
neurotransmitters but rather of the (spiritual) spirit. Like giving/having strength by particles
of love that excites in a good way? Or realizing that one can produce, feel, vibrate without
too many things, just oneself and one's own nourishment.

The living is inseparable from the print at every scales.

At a spiritual level I put the term The feeler. We listen through our ears but is that all? Or
can't I by touching my leg feel the wave slipping through it?

Wisdom while facing games. Its example the most striking might be driving.
Yes it is so easy to respond and fight back, but often there are no winners and sooner or later
the boomerang returns.

Sampling with 100% benefits modulo steps + sampling in ongoing sampling.

Finally, I pose a few themes:

Does life have its solfege?

Do we have to see the living in conceptual detached pieces to understand it?

 What looks promising is communication sharing. Or how great to talk to each other.

View publication stats