Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Relationship Marketing 2
Relationship Marketing 2
Relationship Marketing 2
B To B Marketing
[DATE]
[Nom de la société]
[Adresse de la société]
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
GROUP MEMBERS
MMS 19 368 RAPATSALAHY Andriantsoa Jean Marc
MMS 19 369 RASAMIZANANY Mirindra Jonathan
MMS 19 374 RAVELOARISON Yohann Gianni
MMS 19 376 RAZAFIMAHERY Mbolatiana Stéphanie
MMS 19 377 RAZAKAMIADANA Riantsoa Carine
P a g e 1 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
SUMMARY
I. INTRODUCTION
II. SUMMARY OF THE RELATIONSHIP MARKETING THEORY MAIN
POINTS AND IMPLICATIONS
A. Concept of Relationship Marketing
B. Importance of Commitment and Trust in Relationship Marketing
C. Application of Relationship Marketing to B to B
III. COMPARISON AND CONTRAST BETWEEN THE THEORIES
A. Definitions of the major theories
B. Strength and weaknesses
C. Similarities and differences
D. Complementarities and contradictions
IV. CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP MARKETING
THEORY
A. Limitations
B. Assumptions
C. Future directions in B to B Marketing
V. CONCLUSION
P a g e 2 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
I. INTRODUCTION
P a g e 3 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
The concept of Relationship Marketing refers to any kind of relation or connection that
companies can develop between them. It can concern relational contracting (MacNeil 1980),
relational marketing (Dwyer, Schurr, and Oh 1987), working partnerships (Anderson and
Narus 1990), symbiotic marketing (Varadarajan and Rajaratnam 1986), strategic alliances
(Day 1990), co-marketing alliances (Bucklin and Sengupta 1993), and internal marketing
(Arndt 1983; Berry and Parasuraman 1991).
However, companies are in situation of constant competition with one another. Therefore, in
order to compete, they have to cooperate to remain effective and keep their competitive
advantage. Which is to say, competition, thus cooperation is inevitable between companies
operating in the same business unit.
P a g e 4 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
The concept of relationship marketing has evolved over time, reflecting shifts in consumer
behavior, technological advancements, and changes in the business landscape. While
relationship marketing as a formal discipline emerged in the latter half of the 20th century, its
roots can be traced back to earlier periods.
The seeds of relationship marketing can be found in the early days of commerce when
businesses operated within tight-knit communities, and transactions were often based on
personal relationships and trust. In this context, merchants relied on repeat business and
word-of-mouth referrals, emphasizing the importance of customer satisfaction and loyalty.
With the advent of the Industrial Revolution, mass production and mass marketing became
dominant paradigms. Businesses focused on achieving economies of scale and reaching broad
markets through mass advertising and standardized products. However, this era marked a
shift away from personalized relationships between businesses and customers.
In the 1980s and 1990s, the modern concept of relationship marketing began to take shape
fueled by academic research and industry practices. Scholars such as Leonard Berry,
Theodore Levitt, and Jagdish Sheth explored the importance of customer retention,
satisfaction, and long-term value creation in marketing theory.
Lately, the proliferation of technology, particularly the internet and digital communication
channels, revolutionized the way businesses interact with customers. Customer Relationship
Management (CRM) systems emerged, enabling businesses to collect, analyze, and leverage
customer data to personalize marketing efforts and enhance customer experiences.
As markets became increasingly saturated and competitive, businesses recognized the
importance of differentiating themselves through superior customer service and relationship-
building initiatives. The concept of customer-centricity gained prominence, with businesses
shifting their focus from transactions to long-term customer relationships.
Relationship marketing practices expanded beyond traditional industries like retail and
services to encompass a wide range of sectors, including business-to-business (B2B)
marketing, healthcare, finance, and technology. Businesses began to invest in loyalty
programs, customer engagement initiatives, and personalized marketing strategies to
strengthen relationships with customers. Relationship marketing then became an integral
component of marketing strategy, alongside other paradigms such as transactional marketing
and branding. Businesses recognized that building strong, enduring relationships with
P a g e 5 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
customers not only fosters loyalty and repeat business but also drives sustainable growth and
profitability.
Nowadays in the digital age, relationship marketing continues to evolve in response to
changing consumer behaviors, technological innovations, and market dynamics. Concepts
such as social media marketing, influencer marketing, and customer experience management
have reshaped how businesses engage with customers and nurture relationships in the digital
landscape.
Relationship Marketing can take several forms that can be incorporated by businesses into
their strategies to cultivate strong, enduring relationships with their customers, driving
loyalty, retention, and ultimately, long-term success:
- The partnering involved in relational exchanges between manufacturers and
their goods' suppliers, as in "just-in-time" procurement and "total quality
management" (Frazier, Spekman, and O'Neal 1988; O'Neal 1989);
- Relational exchanges involving service providers, as between advertising or
marketing research agencies and their respective clients (Beltramini and Pitta 1991;
Moorman, Zaltman, and Deshpande 1992);
- Strategic alliances between firms and their competitors, as in technology alliances
(Nueno and Oosterveld 1988); co-marketing alliances (Bucklin and Sengupta 1993);
and global strategic alliances (Ohmae 1989);
- Alliances between a firm and nonprofit organizations, as in public purpose
partnerships (Steckel and Simons 1992);
- Partnerships for joint research and development, as between firms and local, state,
or national governments (Comer, O'Keefe, and Chilenskas 1980);
- Longterm exchanges between firms and ultimate customers, as particularly
recommended in the services marketing area (Berry 1983);
- Relational exchanges of working partnerships, as in channels of distribution
(Anderson and Narus 1990);
- Exchanges involving functional departments (Ruekert and Walker 1987);
- Exchanges between a firm and its employees, as in internal marketing (Arndt 1983;
Berry and Parasuraman 1991);
- And within-firm relational exchanges involving such business units as subsidiaries,
divisions, or strategic business units (Porter 1987).
P a g e 6 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
P a g e 7 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
We can see in this case that commitment and trust play a crucial role in the relationship
building between the two companies. They share similar values that contribute to building
strong and lasting relationships between the partners. This can be categorized as a “Strategic
alliances between firms and their competitors” form of relationship Marketing.
Also, Caterpillar is said to build strong relation with its customers, and that can be
categorized in the “Longterm exchanges between firms and ultimate customers” form of RM.
Last, they said they make meaningful commitments with whom they work, live and serve,
that is to say not only with customers, but also with their provider and their employees. This
can be categorized in the “partnering involved in relational exchanges between manufacturers
and their goods' suppliers” and “Exchanges between a firm and its employees” forms.
P a g e 8 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
P a g e 9 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
1. Strengths
The theory of engagement and trust in relational marketing, developed by Morgan and Hunt,
boasts several remarkable strengths. Firstly, it is built upon solid theoretical foundations,
drawing upon key concepts from social psychology and relationship theory. This robust
theoretical framework provides a precise framework for understanding and managing
interactions between businesses and their customers. Moreover, this theory emphasizes the
sustainability of relationships, highlighting the importance of ongoing interactions and the
establishment of long-term relationships rather than solely focusing on short-term
transactions. This approach fosters customer loyalty and creates long-term value.
Another significant strength lies in its practical application and empirical validation across
various business contexts. Empirical studies have confirmed the theory's key concepts,
enhancing its relevance and usefulness in the real world. By identifying engagement and trust
as central mediating variables in the customer-business relationship, this theory also offers
valuable insights for marketing practitioners. By understanding how these variables influence
customer behavior, businesses can design more effective marketing strategies to nurture
positive and lasting relationships with their clientele.
P a g e 10 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
P a g e 11 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
2. Weaknesses
P a g e 12 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
RELATIONSHIP
TO
THEORY FOCUS KEY CONCEPTS
COMMITMENT-
TRUST THEORY
Commitment-Trust
Development and Emphasizes
Theory of
maintenance of long- commitment and trust N/A
Relationship
term relationships as crucial elements
Marketing
Signals, such as
Communication of Signals contribute
branding and
Signaling Theory credible information to trust-building in
reputation, convey
to reduce uncertainty relationships
information
Sustainable Firm-level
Resource-Based competitive Firm-specific resources resources
View Theory advantage through and capabilities complement
unique resources relational aspects
Structure and
Highlights
dynamics of social Interconnectedness and
Network Theory importance of
and business relationship influence
relationships
networks
P a g e 13 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
P a g e 14 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
A. Limitations
LIMITATION DESCRIPTION
P a g e 15 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
abstract concepts.
B. Assumptions
In the 1990s, many researchers were determined to identify the different variables influencing
the relational approach. Based on empirical research, they were able to deduce that there are a
total of six key variables: trust, commitment, communication, shared value, cooperation and
social contact. These variables play a crucial role in the development and maintenance of
solid, lasting relationships between individuals or organizations.
The KMV model, developed by Morgan and Hunt in 1994, focuses on two key variables:
commitment and trust. These components are essential for building strong, lasting
relationships between companies and their customers.
To clarify the importance and dynamics between engagement and trust in the context of
relationship marketing, a series of 13 hypotheses were developed, seeking to determine
whether these two variables are simply additional factors influencing results, or whether they
play a central role in the overall success of relationship marketing.
H1: There is a positive relationship between relationship termination costs and relationship
commitment.
H2: There is a positive relationship between relationship benefits and relationship
commitment.
H3: There is a positive relationship between shared values and relationship commitment.
H4: There is a positive relationship between shared values and trust.
H5: There is a positive relationship between communication and trust.
P a g e 16 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
The analysis confirmed the 13 initial hypotheses, and further modeling validated 12 of them.
This means that the initial ideas explain more than half of the commitment and trust in
relationships, as well as a significant proportion of the observed results, notably cooperation,
which is crucial in this field. In short, it shows that commitment and trust are really important
for success in relationship marketing.
A company's human resources play a crucial role in establishing relationship marketing based
on commitment and trust. Employees, especially those in direct contact with customers, such
as sales representatives, have a significant impact on the customer experience. Indeed,
beyond the dialogues and exchanges established by salespeople, the customer experience is
strongly influenced by the quality of the welcome and interactions with the company's staff.
Take, for example, the case where a customer visits the company's premises to obtain
P a g e 17 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
information. If this customer feels well received and well informed about his or her requests,
he or she is more likely to return in the future. This positive first impression left by the
company's employees helps to reinforce the customer's trust in the brand and encourages
future commitment.
In this context, employee training is of paramount importance. By equipping them with the
skills needed to deliver quality customer service, and to respond effectively to customer
needs and expectations, the company can guarantee positive, memorable interactions at every
touchpoint. Thus, investing in staff training is essential to ensure the consistency and quality
of the customer experience, reinforcing the relationship of trust and commitment between the
company and its customers.
P a g e 18 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
V. CONCLUSION
P a g e 19 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
ANNEX
The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing – Robert M. Morgan & Shelby D.
Hunt
P a g e 20 | 22
RELATION SHIP MARKETING
Table of content
I. INTRODUCTION_______________________________________________________3
II. SUMMARY OF THE RELATIONSHIP MARKETING THEORY MAIN
POINTS AND IMPLICATIONS_______________________________________________4
A. CONCEPT OF RELATIONSHIP MARKETING____________________________________4
1. Definition of Relationship Marketing______________________________________4
2. History of Relationship Marketing________________________________________5
3. Forms of Relationship Marketing________________________________________6
B. IMPORTANCE OF COMMITMENT AND TRUST IN RELATIONSHIP MARKETING__________7
C. APPLICATION OF RELATIONSHIP MARKETING TO B TO B________________________8
III. COMPARISON AND CONTRAST BETWEEN THE THEORIES_____________9
A. DEFINITIONS OF THE MAJOR THEORIES_______________________________________9
B. STRENGTH AND WEAKNESSES_____________________________________________10
1. Strengths___________________________________________________________10
2. Weaknesses_________________________________________________________12
C. SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES__________________________________________13
D. COMPLEMENTARITIES AND CONTRADICTIONS________________________________14
IV. CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP MARKETING
THEORY_________________________________________________________________15
A. LIMITATIONS__________________________________________________________15
B. ASSUMPTIONS_________________________________________________________16
C. FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN B TO B MARKETING_________________________________18
V. CONCLUSION________________________________________________________19
ANNEX___________________________________________________________________20
P a g e 21 | 22