Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Blockchain Technology in The Banking Industry
Blockchain Technology in The Banking Industry
Elaborated by :
Machraoui Amal
Matteli Tasnim
Mentored by :
M. Laarif Mehdi
1st year GI
We would like to express our sincere thanks to our mentor, Mr. Laarif Mehdi,
for his constant support throughout our work. His care, expertise, and insightful
advice greatly contributed to the success of our bibliographic project. We are also
grateful to him for the valuable time he has dedicated for us, his precise guidance,
as well as his pedagogical qualities.
We would also like to express our gratitude to the entire teaching and admin-
istrative staff of ENIT.
Finally, we would like to thank all the individuals who have contributed, di-
rectly or indirectly, to the completion of this project.
2
Table of contents
List of Figures 5
General introduction 1
1 Overview of blockchain 2
1.1 Introduction of chapter 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2 Insight into Blockchain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2.1 History of blockchain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2.2 Definition and key characteristics of blockchain . . . . . . . 3
1.3 Blockchain structure and functionality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.4 Blockchain types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.4.1 Public blockchain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.4.2 Private blockchain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.4.3 Consortium blockchain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.4.4 Hybrid blockchain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.5 Synthesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.6 Conclusion of chapter 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3
3 Case study: DBS bank 21
3.1 Introduction of chapter 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.2 Introduction to DBS bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.3 Motivations of DBS bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.4 Project Ubin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.4.1 Project Ubin’s different phases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.4.2 Results and achievements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.5 Project Orchid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.5.1 Project Orchid’s different phases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.5.2 Commercial and Operational factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.6 Conclusion of chapter 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
General conclusion 29
References 30
4
List of Figures
This end-of-year project will delve into the concept of blockchain and its pro-
found implications for the banking industry. As it explores the multifaceted land-
scape of blockchain technology, it will analyze its transformative potential and its
application within the banking sector. So, it will be organized into three main
chapters, each examining the distinct aspects of blockchain technology and its ap-
plication in the banking industry:
1
Chapter 1
Overview of blockchain
2
digital currencies became quite predominant.[11]
3
Auditability, also known as provenance, refers to the ability to verify and re-
view transactions recorded on the blockchain. Trust is also crucial in blockchain
because it helps people believe in the system. Blockchain is designed to be reli-
able and secure, making it trustworthy for recording transactions. It can create a
tamper-proof record of transactions, which can facilitate trust between parties in
business transactions. [15] [16] [17]
We can see that the chain of blocks is created by the hash4 of the previous
block. A block is divided into two components : block header and list of transac-
tions.
4
Hash: It is a unique cryptographic fingerprint generated from data within a block, serving
as a digital signature that ensures the integrity and immutability of the block’s contents.
4
Figure 1.1: The architecture of Blockchain[5]
The second component of the block is a list of valid transactions. The number of
transactions in a block depends upon the block and transaction size. Authorization
and authentication of the transactions are done by asymmetric cryptography. Once
a transaction is included in the chain, it cannot be removed or altered. Blocks are
chained together, where each block includes a hash of the previous block, and a
chain of blocks “Blockchain” is created.
A block will be accepted in the chain if it is valid and has proof of work, which
is a computationally difficult hash generated by the mining procedure. As it has
a secure hashing technique it ensures that if any of the blocks is modified, all
succeeding blocks will have to be recomputed. Figure 1.2 depicts how the longest
chain is accepted and added into the Blockchain and other shorter chains are re-
jected.
Miners try to mine blocks on their own with the list of transactions that are
yet to be added. Once a block is mined, it transmits to all other nodes in the
network for verification.
Out of so many blocks in the network, the block with the highest consensus
will be accepted to be added into the network. Other blocks are considered as
orphan blocks and rejected later by the network. Orphan blocks contain trans-
actions already in the latest valid block, but may also include new transactions
awaiting processing in future mining.[5]
5
Figure 1.2: Accepting/Rejecting blocks[5]
The transactions made by the blockchain users are provided to the network via
software like web services, mobile applications and so on. Once a transaction is
submitted, the software sends it to a particular node or to a set of nodes. This
does not mean that the transaction is added to the blockchain. The transactions
would be in the queue of the publishing node and will be added in blockchain after
the node publishes a block. [5]
6
Figure 1.3: Blockchain types [author]
7
1.4.2 Private blockchain
It is managed by a central authority who selects the nodes participating in the
network. This kind of blockchain is open for authorized users only.
The rate of transaction processes is high due to its small size so the verification
of each node is less time consuming. It is also balanced because only some users
have access to the network which leads to its improvement.
Furthermore, this type is very customizable. It allows organizations to have a
suitable network responding to their specific needs by altering it with their rules
and requirements.
However, the centralized facet of this type can make some information restric-
tively invisible for participants which limits the transparency of the network. This
results in the lack of trust between nodes.
As examples of this type we have Hyperledger, Corda. Some of the use cases
of this type are internal voting, asset ownership and supply chain management.[19]
8
tions, and the other part is decentralized like the public blockchain.
The most advantageous thing about this blockchain is that it cannot be hacked
because most users don’t have access to the network.This type of blockchain can
choose which transactions and records to be public but this can make it less trans-
parent.
Examples of Hybrid Blockchain are Ripple network and XRP token.
This type can be used in the healthcare industry, government, real estate, and
financial companies.[19]
In conclusion, the various types of blockchain each with its unique character-
istics, advantages and disadvantages contribute to the diverse landscape of tech-
nologies, shaping the future of digital innovation.[19]
1.5 Synthesis
Blockchain technology is characterized by its focus on security and immutabil-
ity, securing the undergoing integrity of transaction records. Technically it operates
in a decentralized way, removing the necessity for a central authority and placing
control in the hands of network nodes. This decentralization not only enhances
transparency but also strengthens the security of the entire system.
One of the features of blockchain is its capacity to offer both transparency,
facilitated by a public ledger visible to all members, and participant anonymity
through the use of anonymous addresses. This unique combination allows for a
secure and transparent environment where users can engage in transactions with
a certain level of privacy.
The base of blockchain’s reliability lies in its tamper-proof record of transac-
tions. This feature implants trust in business dealings, as parties can be assured
that once a transaction is recorded, it cannot be altered.
The potential applications of blockchain technology reaches a wide array of
industries. In finance, it has the capability to revolutionize traditional systems
through decentralized financial structures, providing increased accessibility and
inclusivity. In supply chain management, blockchain enhances trust and trans-
parency by offering an immutable record of the entire supply chain process. Health-
care records can be securely managed using hybrid blockchain solutions, ensuring
both privacy and accessibility.
In essence, blockchain technology stands as a groundbreaking innovation with
the power to reshape industries by addressing core concerns such as security, trans-
parency, and trust. Its decentralized and tamper-proof nature introduces a new
era of reliability and efficiency in various applications, promising transformative
9
changes in the way we conduct business and manage data.
10
Chapter 2
11
Besides, these banks also have problems in transparency and trust because
the person controlling the system has access to all the information of customers
and this can hinder financial inclusivity. As an illustration, when encountering
an advertisement from a bank offering significant bonuses for depositing funds, a
thorough examination The fine print reveals hidden fees and conditions that di-
minish the advertised benefits. This analysis illustrates how the bank may deceive
customers. [21]
Banks are also faced with money loss because of fighting money laundering and
terrorism. According to Global Anti-Money Laundering Survey 2014, banks have
spent about $10 billion to check the identity of a customer and to make sure that
the money isn’t going to bad users which also takes a long time. This process is
called AML and KYC1 . [21]
12
Figure 2.1 presents both conventional and modern ways of money transfer
through banks A, B, C, and D. The conventional method adopts a long route and
consumes much time and effort and charges a significant fee. On the contrary,
the modern way of international payments using blockchain technology and DLT
makes the whole process rapid and safe.[12]
13
Figure 2.2: Blockchain technology in asset-backed securitization [6]
14
Figure 2.3: Smart contracts mechanism[12]
15
Companies use this technology to collect and store data of their customers to use
them for different purposes.
Particularly, in the finance and banking industry, it is highlighted that the
blockchain identity management system needs to be adopted to ensure the security
of the users and creditors. Many financial institutions and banks have introduced
the KYC and KYB 3 strategies and the core storage point is centralized where
the information of each customer is integrated. In this form of centralized system,
there are possibilities that the information of customers would be stolen and they
would be susceptible to hackers.
Thus, blockchain technology provides a user-to-user experience through a de-
centralized mechanism of storing individual customer information so that there is
no information theft.[12]
16
to over $100 million due to complexities in design and integration with existing
systems. [3]
Moreover, regulatory uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin
complicates blockchain adoption efforts. For instance, the lack of clear regula-
tory structures in many jurisdictions creates legal uncertainties for banks seeking
to transact in cryptocurrencies or use blockchain-based solutions for financial ser-
vices. This regulatory ambiguity was exemplified by the legal battles faced by
cryptocurrency exchanges like Coinbase and Bitfinex over compliance with AML
and KYC regulations. [3]
Furthermore, scalability issues, such as the limited transaction efficiency and
high energy consumption of major public blockchain networks like Bitcoin and
Ethereum, pose significant challenges for widespread adoption in the banking in-
dustry. For instance, the Bitcoin network’s limited capacity to process transactions
has led to crowding and high transaction fees during periods of peak demand, mak-
ing it unsuitable for high-volume financial transactions. [3]
Lastly, the unique characteristics of cryptocurrencies, such as their volatility
and lack of intrinsic value, present additional complexities for banks considering
their adoption. For example, the extreme price volatility of cryptocurrencies like
Bitcoin and Ethereum can pose risks to banks’ balance sheets and financial sta-
bility if not properly managed. Additionally, concerns about the potential for
regulatory crackdowns or bans on cryptocurrencies in certain jurisdictions create
legal uncertainties for banks seeking to integrate them into their operations. [3]
In conclusion, while blockchain technology holds immense promise for revo-
lutionizing the banking industry by enabling secure, transparent, and efficient
financial transactions, its widespread adoption faces formidable challenges rang-
ing from regulatory compliance and operational risks to financial, regulatory, and
reputational concerns.
Overcoming these challenges will require collaborative efforts from banks, regu-
lators, policymakers, and technology providers to develop robust regulatory frame-
works, enhance security measures, reduce financial risks, and build public trust in
blockchain technology.
17
Figure 2.4: Blockchain SWOT [author]
Strengths:
18
Weaknesses:
Opportunities:
19
Threats:
20
Chapter 3
21
markets were providing a diverse array of inventive financial services and products
which were reshaping the traditional banking systems. In this instance, DBS faced
a challenge from the Chinese e-commerce giant, Alibaba, which was occupying
any available niche in the market. The company had gained a large share in the
Singaporean-based company Lazada, a major player in the South Asian market.
These Fintech companies posed a significant competition for the banking system
by introducing their debit and credit cards. Therefore, this competition saw a
decline in the number of people utilizing traditional banking services.
The other reason was that DBS was experiencing institutional constraints for
acquisition-led and organic expansion in the region. DBS could not obtain an
Indian-based bank which promped them to consider alternative methods of scaling
their presence in the one billion markets. Their only available recourse was through
digital transformation. Hence, they had to establish a digital bank because it would
reach a larger audience and was flexible to the market. This approach allowed them
to enter the market successfully.
The Asian market was rapidly evolving and adopting digital technology. Thus,
the growing demand for digital services across Asia required a change for DBS too.
In 2014, there were already 700 million digital users, and the number was expected
to rise to 1.7 billion by 2020.[24]
Back in 2009, DBS bank had the lowest customer satisfaction scores of any
bank in Singapore, so digital transformation and implementing blockchain tech-
nology into the banking sector became crucial.[14]
22
sociation of financial institutions on a proof-of-concept project to perform
inter-bank payments using Blockchain technology. The consortium engages
several banks including DBS bank and Information Systems, which serves
as the technology provider.[10]
• Phase 4: The BoC, BoE and the MAS together published a report in Novem-
ber 2018 which evaluates alternative models that could improve cross-border
payments and settlements. The report investigates existing challenges and
considers alternative models that could eventually lead to upgrades in speed,
cost and transparency for users.
MAS and BoC later connected their respective experimental domestic pay-
ment networks, specifically Project Jasper and Project Ubin, and announced
on 2 May 2019 a successful experiment on cross-border and cross-currency
payments using central bank digital currencies.[10]
• Phase 5: Phase 5 continued the work from Phase 4 of Project Ubin and
explored the development of the multi-currency payments model.
This phase network offers connectivity interfaces for other blockchain net-
works to connect and integrate smoothly, and additional features to support
use-cases such as DVP with private exchanges, conditional payments and
escrow for Trade, and payment commitments for Trade Finance.
1
DvP: It is a method of settlement that essentially ensures the transfer of securities only after
payment is complete.
23
In addition to technical experimentation, this phase also aimed to inves-
tigate and demonstrate the business value of a blockchain-based payments
network such as in enabling business opportunities that would benefit from
or be made viable through greater cost efficiencies as compared to existing
systems. Together with its partners, MAS conducted workshops and discus-
sions with over 40 financial and non-financial firms to evaluate the potential
benefits. The findings are captured in the Phase 5 report, which studies the
use of blockchain technology in commercial applications across different in-
dustries, and how these applications could take advantage from integrating
with the blockchain-based payments network prototype developed.[10]
2
RTGS: It’s a payment system facilitating immediate, individual transaction processing be-
tween banks or financial institutions, ensuring real-time fund transfers without delays.
24
• Increased Confidence: The success of Project Ubin boosted confidence in the
potential of blockchain for financial services. This could encourage further
investment and exploration of blockchain solutions by DBS and other finan-
cial institutions in Singapore. [8]
3
CBDC: it’s a digital currency issued by central banks. Its value is linked to the issuing
country’s official currency in this case Singapore.
25
Figure 3.1: PBM Lifecycle Stages [10]
• Phase 2: The industry group including DBS bank formed in Phase 2 ex-
panded the use of PBM in new scenarios with a focus in commercial appli-
cation in Singapore’s financial landscape. MAS, together with the industry
group, published the Orchid Blueprint, which sets out the development of
core infrastructure components and learnings from the various industry pi-
lots and industry engagements.
Project Orchid states precisely building blocks for digital money infrastruc-
ture in Singapore and how utilizing it in the banking sector can be put in
motion.[10]
26
A brief explication of the identified building blocks are as follows:
27
QR) and consumer user experience.
- Commercial transparency: Open for existing service supplier, merchant acquir-
ers to integrate and participate. The scheme must be climbable and technology
neutral.
- Commercial viability for members: The pricing must be fair and transparent.[10]
28
General conclusion
This end-of-year project provided a detailed exploration of blockchain technol-
ogy and its implications for the banking sector. It helped us understand the concept
by defining blockchain and examining its key characteristics, historical context,
structure, functionality, and various types. Following this, the focus shifted to the
application of blockchain in banking, addressing the industry’s key issues and how
blockchain can revolutionize banking operations.
The project also discussed the challenges in implementing blockchain technol-
ogy in banking, along with a SWOT analysis to evaluate its strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats. An example of a case study of DBS Bank highlighting
project Ubin and project Orchid in collaboration with the Monetary Authority of
Singapore, offered us some perceptions into real-world blockchain applications.
However, this emerging technology remains challenging to master. People still
lack comprehensive knowledge and expertise to fully exploit its potential. There is
a pressing need for continuous learning, skill development, and hands-on experience
to navigate the complexities of blockchain technology. Additionally, ongoing re-
search and collaboration are essential to address the evolving nature of blockchain
and its applications in banking.
29
References
[3] AMRINDER Singh and al. Financial sector and blockchain technology: Chal-
lenges and applications. pnrjournal, January 2023.
[8] DARSHINI Dalal and al. The future is here project ubin: Sgd on distributed
ledger. Deloitte, 2016.
[9] HUAQUN Guo Xingjie Yu. Blockchain: Research and applications. Journal
of the Zhejiang University Press, 2022.
[11] SANDEEP Kumar Panda and al. Blockchain Technology: Applications and
Challenges. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2021.
30
[12] SHAHNAWAZ Khan and al. Blockchain technology and computational ex-
cellence for society 5.0. IGI Global, 2022.
[13] Peter Weill SIA Siew Kien and Mou Xu. Dbs: From the world’s best bank to
building the future-ready enterprise. MIT, March 2019.
[14] V.Keshavdev. Why dbs bank’s woes are a forewarning to bankers on a digital
dope. Fortune India, December 23,2023.
31
[25] Singapore, south africa, and philippines are building smarter money. https:
//consensys.io/blog/how-singapore-south-africa-and-the-philipp
ines-are-building-smarter-money-with-blockchain. [accessed 20 mars
2024].
32