Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 310

FINAL

Energy Audit -
ASHRAE Level II
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario

Prepared for:

Town of Erin
5684 Trafalgar Rd.
Hillsburgh, ON N0B 1Z0

Attention: Ursula D’Angelo


Director of Finance

October 3, 2019

Pinchin File: 241444

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd.


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Issued to: Town of Erin


Contact: Ursula D’Angelo
Director of Finance
Issued on: October 3, 2019
Pinchin File: 241444
Issuing Office: Mississauga, ON
Primary Pinchin Contact: Melissa Anastacio, P.Eng., LEED AP
905.363.1434
manastacio@pinchin.com

Author: Ms. Carleen Lawson, MBSc, BAS


Project Technologist
289.971.7431
clawson@pinchin.com

Reviewer: Mr. Paul Frasie, M.Eng., P.Eng., LEED Green Associate


Senior Project Manager
905.363.1457
pfrasie@pinchin.com

Reviewer: Mr. Ahmed Alyousif, PhD., P.Eng.


Director, Building Science and Sustainability
905.363.1459
aalyousif@pinchin.com

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page i


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Pinchin Ltd. (Pinchin) was retained by Town of Erin to conduct an energy audit of the Erin Fire Station No.
10 located at 2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario.

The purpose of the energy audits is to identify how energy is used on site and how to maximize available
funds across the best energy conservation measures. To achieve the greatest energy reduction, the
Client would like to implement a series of energy conservation measures (ECMs).

This report provides an analysis of historical energy data at the Town of Erin building located at 2 Erinville
Drive, Erin, Ontario, to determine the effects of weather, billing abnormalities and analyze current energy
and water systems. Energy consumption data is summarized by end use such as lighting, heating,
ventilation and plug loads. Energy conservation measures for the subject building are summarized based
on the information gathered during Pinchin’s facility audit and information provided by the client.

Annual Annual Annual Annual Est.


Potential Est.
Electrical Gas GHG Cost Est. Grant
Recommendation Savings Payback
Savings Savings Savings Savings Cost ($) Incentive
(%) (Yrs.)
(GJ) (GJ) (Kg) ($) ($)
Programmable
4.1 Thermostats 1.9 18.0 1,084 149 6% 5,500 0 37
(529 kWh) (484 m3)
Installation
IR Tube Heater -
4.2 Two Stage 19.9 1,034 100 6% 20,000 0 201
(534m3)
Replacement
DHW Heater -
4.3 Heat Pump 5.6 278 166 1% 5,000 0 30
(150 m3)
Replacement
Vending Machine -
5.2 Energy Star 4.4 334 135 1% 3,000 0 22
(1,209 kWh)
Replacement
7.1 Lighting Retrofit 14.2 1,089 441 4% 12,578 1,557 25
(3,946 kWh)
Motion Controlled 3.4
7.2 260 105 1% 440 0 4
Light Switches (943 kWh)
DG Window 1.5 13.9
8.1 838 116 4% 8,048 0 70
Replacement (409 kWh) (374 m3)
TG Window 1.7 16.1
8.2 967 133 5% 10,465 0 78
Replacement (472 kWh) (432 m3)

Pinchin’s proposed energy conservation measures aim to reduce the building’s EUI by approximately
23%, resulting in an EUI of 0.54 GJ/m2/yr. The annual energy cost and maintenance savings associated
with achieving the Post-Retrofit EUI is approximately $1,345 (assuming that the triple glazed (TG)
windows are selected over Double glazed (DG) windows).

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page ii


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
Facility Overview................................................................................................................... 1
Building Operations .............................................................................................................. 2
1.2.1 Recent Building Upgrades and Contemplated Energy Conservation Measures ......... 2
1.2.2 Typical Energy Consumption Breakdown .................................................................... 3
HVAC Equipment ................................................................................................................. 3
Pumps and Motors................................................................................................................ 5
Lighting ................................................................................................................................. 6
Building Envelope ................................................................................................................. 7
2.0 UTILITY INFORMATION.................................................................................................................. 8
Annual Utility Cost Breakdown ............................................................................................. 8
Energy Consumption ............................................................................................................ 9
2.2.1 Energy Consumption Summary ................................................................................... 9
2.2.2 Energy Consumption Analysis ................................................................................... 10
3.0 ENERGY CONSUMPTION BENCHMARKING ............................................................................. 13
Introduction to Energy Use Intensity .................................................................................. 13
Energy Use Intensity Analysis ............................................................................................ 13
Actual Energy Use Breakdown ........................................................................................... 14
4.0 HVAC RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................... 15
Programmable Thermostats Installation ............................................................................. 16
IR Tube Heater – Two Stage Replacement ....................................................................... 17
DHW Heater - Heat Pump Replacement ............................................................................ 17
Install Sub-Meters at the Major Mechanical Equipment. .................................................... 18
5.0 PUMPS AND MOTORS RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................... 18
Installation Variable Flow Drive (VFDs) on Pumps and Variable Speed Drives (VSDs) Fan
Motors 19
Demand Control Ventilation................................................................................................ 19
Vending Machine – Energy Star Refurbishment ................................................................ 20
6.0 LIGHTING RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................ 20
Light Fixture Retrofit ........................................................................................................... 20
Motion Controlled Light Switch Installation ......................................................................... 24
7.0 BUILDING ENVELOPE RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 24
Window Retrofit .................................................................................................................. 24
Continued Inspections ........................................................................................................ 26
8.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 27
9.0 DISCARDED CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................ 27
Install a Digital BAS (Building Automation System) ........................................................... 27
Supplemental Roof Insulation............................................................................................. 29
Supplemental Wall Insulation ............................................................................................. 29
10.0 NON-FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS.......................................................................................... 30

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page iii


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

11.0 RECOMMENDED ITEMS FOR ASHRAE LEVEL III (CAPITAL GRADE) ENERGY AUDIT ......... 30
12.0 TERMS AND LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................... 31

APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Utility Bill Data


APPENDIX II Photographs
APPENDIX III Mechanical Equipment List
APPENDIX IV Ranking of Measures
APPENDIX V Assumptions and Calculations

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page iv


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1: Building Characteristics ............................................................................................... 2


Table 1-2 HVAC Energy Conservation Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 10 ................ 5
Table 1-3 Pumps and Motors Energy Conservation Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No.
10 .................................................................................................................................................. 6
Table 1-4 Lighting Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 10 ................................................ 7
Table 1-5 Building Envelope Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 10 ................................ 8
Table 3-1 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Erin Fire Station No. 10 .......................................... 15
Table 4-1 Major HVAC Equipment in Use at Erin Fire Station No. 10 ........................................ 16
Table 4-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with the installation of programmable at
Erin Fire Station No. 10............................................................................................................... 17
Table 4-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with IR tube heater replacement at the Erin
Fire Station No. 10 ...................................................................................................................... 17
Table 4-4 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Erin Fire
Station No. 10 ............................................................................................................................. 18
Table 5-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Erin Fire
Station No. 10 ............................................................................................................................. 20
Table 6-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with lighting retrofit at Erin Fire Station No.
10 ................................................................................................................................................ 21
Table 6-2 Summary of Existing and Proposed Lighting Fixtures on Site .................................... 23
Table 6-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with Motion Controlled Light Switch
installation at Erin Fire Station No. 10 ......................................................................................... 24
Table 7-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with full DG window replacement at Erin
Fire Station No. 10 ...................................................................................................................... 25
Table 7-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with full triple glazing window replacement
at Erin Fire Station No. 10 ........................................................................................................... 26
Table 9-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with pneumatic to DDC conversion at the
Erin Fire Station No. 10............................................................................................................... 28
Table 9-2: Summary of Costs and Savings associated with Supplemental Roof Insulation at Erin
Fire Station No. 10 ...................................................................................................................... 29
Table 9-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with supplemental wall insulation at Erin
Fire Station No. 10 ...................................................................................................................... 30

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Typical Energy End-Use Breakdown in a Fire Station ................................................. 3


Figure 1-3 Estimated Breakdown of Annual Lighting Energy Consumption ................................. 6

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page v


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-1 Breakdown of Average Annual Utility Costs ................................................................ 9


Figure 2-2: Annual Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Erin Fire Station No. 10 .... 9
Figure 2-3: Monthly Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Erin Fire Station No. 10 . 10
Figure 2-4 Electricity and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis ......................................... 11
Figure 2-5: Electricity and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis ........................................ 11
Figure 2-6: Natural Gas and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis .................................... 12
Figure 2-7: Natural Gas and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis..................................... 12
Figure 2-8: Electricity Consumption and Cooling Degree Days .................................................. 12
Figure 3-1 EUI Comparison between Erin Fire Station No. 10 and ASHRAE EUI Target .......... 14
Figure 3-2 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Erin Fire Station No. 10 ......................................... 15
Figure 6-1 Energy consumption comparison of existing and proposed lighting. ......................... 21
Figure 7-1 Energy consumption comparison of existing DG windows and proposed DG and
Triple glazing window replacement ............................................................................................. 25

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page vi


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Pinchin Ltd. (Pinchin) was retained by Ursula D’Angelo, Director of Finance at Town of Erin to conduct an
ASHRAE Level II Energy Audit of Erin Fire Station No. 10 located at 2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario.

The purpose of the energy audit to is identify how energy is used on site and how to maximize available
funds across the best energy conservation measures. To achieve the greatest energy reduction, the
Client would like to implement a series of energy conservation mea7sures (ECMs).

The audit was conducted by Pinchin assessors, Carleen Lawson and Raven Cote, on July 3th at which
time Pinchin interviewed and was accompanied by the Fire Chief, hereinafter refer to as the “Site
Representative”.

Cost estimates provided in this report are preliminary Class “D” and provided only as an indication of the
order of magnitude of the remedial work. These values have been arrived at by determining a
representative quantity from the visual observations made at the time of our Site visit and by applying
current market value unit costs to such quantities and or a reasonable lump sum allowance for the work.
More precise cost estimates would require more detailed investigation to define the scope of work. They
are not intended to warrant that the final costs will not exceed these amounts or that all costs are
covered. The estimates assume the work is performed at one time and do not include costs for potential
de-mobilization and re-mobilization if repairs/replacement are spread out over the term of analysis.

All costs are identified in 2019 Canadian Dollars, including a 20% contingency fee to cover unforeseen
costs. Repair/replacement cost estimates are accurate to +/- 50%.

All cost estimates assume that regular annual maintenance and repairs will be performed to all building
elements at the facility. No cost allowance is carried for this regular maintenance.

The cost estimates provided in this report are based on costs of past repairs at similar buildings, recent
costing data such as “RS Means” and “Hanscomb’s Yardsticks for Costing”, or Pinchin’s professional
judgment.

Energy Savings and Demand Savings provided in this report are estimated to an accuracy of +/- 30%

This report satisfies all requirements an ASHRAE level II energy Audit as stated by the
ANSI/ASHRAE/ACCA Standard 211-2018 and ASHRAE Standard 100-2015 -- Energy Efficiency in
Existing Buildings.

Facility Overview

Table 1-1 Provides a Summary of the Building Use and Construction.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 1-1: Building Characteristics

Building Age 35 years (Construction circa 1984);


Ownership Status Owned by Town of Erin

Utility Data Electricity – Hydro One, Gas – Enbridge, Water – Town of Erin
Gross Floor Area Main Building: 446 m2 (4,800 ft2); Storage Building: 74 m2 (800 ft2)
Building Type Government (Emergency Services)
Occupied Hours ~ 10 hours/week
Regular Occupancy ~1.25 fulltime equivalent staff, ~15 visitors 200 times a year
Roof System Sloped metal roof and sloped asphalt shingled
Wall System Corrugated metal panels and spilt-face architectural block
Windows Single glazed, aluminum framed windows; (Window-to-Wall-Ratio: 0.06)

Building Operations

A solid understanding of building operations and occupancy allows building owners to assess the varying
power and ventilation loads and improve the efficiency of energy using systems. The Site Building is
comprised of 446 m2 of emergency services space. The Site Building provides fire fighting services.

The fire hall is only used when required. Due to the fluctuation in attendance, the average number of
occupants is difficult to accurately specify. The Site Representative informed Pinchin that there are
approximately 15 to 30 fire fighters that answer a call. In addition, the Site Representative reported that
there are on average 200 calls a year. In the evening the building is used occasionally for community
events and weekly training sessions. Pinchin estimates that there are approximately 6 hours a week on
average of events or training. The kitchen is assumed to be used approximately 1 hour a week, while the
fridge and cooler operate all year.

1.2.1 Recent Building Upgrades and Contemplated Energy Conservation Measures

This section details the recent upgrades and changes to the building as well as any ECMs contemplated
by the building mangers:

 A new A “Nederman” exhaust fan system with extraction arms is anticipated to be installed within
the truck bay area of the building. The system captures harmful fumes and improves air quality.

 The building managers have contemplated converting from fluorescent to LED lamps.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

 The installation of energy star washer and dryer are anticipated in the future. Pinchin
recommends heavy duty, high efficiency, gas fired models to keep energy costs low and the life
expectancy long.

1.2.2 Typical Energy Consumption Breakdown

A study of the energy consumption breakdown within similar buildings is a key first step in determining
opportunities for energy reduction (refer to Figure 1-1). Pinchin has provided a breakdown of a fire station
end-use energy. Energy in a fire station is dominantly used by the space heating, equipment, domestic
hot water (DHW) and lighting systems. Recommended retrofits will be focused on these areas to best
improve the Site’s overall energy efficiency and lower utility costs.

Figure 1-1 Typical Energy End-Use Breakdown in a Fire Station1

Ventilation Cooling
8% 1%
Plug load
1%

Lighting
18%

Heating
49%

Domestic Hot Water


10%

Other Equip
13%

HVAC Equipment

The primary HVAC equipment in use at Erin Fire Station No. 10 is described in the following section. A full
list of the HVAC equipment is provided in Appendix III.

Heating and ventilation of the Site Building are provided by one (1) gas-fired furnace, two (2) gas fired low
intensity infrared (IR) heaters, one (1) electric unit heater (UH), five (5) electric baseboard heaters (BBH)

1
Design for Off: Key Mechanical Engineering Design Features for Significant Energy Savings by Jonathan Heller, David Baylon and
Shanti Oram, Ecotope Inc.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 3 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

and three (3) electric force flow heaters (FFH). Additional ventilation is provided by exhaust fans and the
kitchen hood fan.

Primarily, heating for the building is provided by one (1) “Lennox Elite”, high efficiency, gas-fired furnace
serving the office area of the main fire station building, and two (2) gas-fired radiant tube heaters serving
the truck bay area of the building. The furnace unit appeared to be manufactured in 2012, and therefore is
approximately 7 years old. The radiant heating tube system was manufactured in 2011 and therefore is
approximately 8 years old.

An electrical suspended unit heater manufactured by “Stelpro” was observed within the storage building.
The age of the unit heater is unknown.

The building is not provided with a cooling system.

The Site Building’s exhaust system consists of various exhaust fans for the washrooms, change rooms,
truck area, storage, and some common areas. The exhaust fans are vented to the atmosphere through
the exterior walls or through the roof. The fans were observed to be in serviceable condition.

An exhaust fan and a damper were noted within the storage building of the Site. The fan was
manufactured in 2009 (approximately 10 years old) and appeared to be in generally good condition.
Reportedly, the damper is thermostatically controlled.

Additionally, ceiling mounted exhaust fans were noted within the truck bay area, which exhaust to the
exterior through the roof. As reported by the Site Representative, a new A “Nederman” exhaust fan
system with extraction arms is anticipated to be installed within the truck bay area of the building.

The individual HVAC equipment is controlled by individual standalone thermostats. The Site
Representative reported that the there was no thermostat program schedule in place. During our Site
Visit, the heating set point and setback were observed to be 20 °C (68 °F). Reduced setpoints would
reduce energy consumption and utility costs. This suggested upgrade is discussed further in Section 4 of
the report.

Domestic hot water (DHW) production and storage within the facility is a year-round operation. Domestic
hot water production is accomplished with one (1) electric tank style DHW heater. The unit possesses a
maximum heating capacity of 4.5 kW.

The recommended upgrades are discussed further in Section 4.0 of the report.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 4 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 1-2 HVAC Energy Conservation Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 10

Equipment Type Issue Recommendation Section

No established
Programmable program for Program seasonal temperature
4.1
Thermostats temperature set set point and setbacks.
point.

Existing units are


only a one stage Replace with two stage IR Tube
IR Tube Heater 4.2
models and have Heaters
achieved their PUL.

Existing unit is tank


Replace with an energy star,
DHW Heater style and is not 4.3
heat pump DHW heater.
Energy Star

Meters No sub-meters are Install sub-meters. 4.4


present.

Pumps and Motors

The pumps in use at Erin Fire Station No. 10 include those that are associated with the fire safety
systems. The motors in use at Erin Fire Station No. 10 consist of the Old Pump house compressor motor,
exhaust fan motors, DHW motor, furnace motor and various smaller motors for plug loads.

The fans may be operated by the user or when the heating is engaged by the programmable thermostat.

Ventilation is a key contributor to the Site building’s base load demand, base power demand and annual
average power factor levels. Power factor is important to consider when analysing the impact of inductive
loads on the Site Building’s annual utility costs; Power factor tends to decrease as inductive loads
increase. In addition, power demand must be considered as it is correlated to electrical equipment use.
Improvements to motor efficiency will lead to a reduction in energy consumption. Table 1-3 lists Pinchin’s
pumps and motor energy conservation recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 10.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 5 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 1-3 Pumps and Motors Energy Conservation Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 10
Equipment Type Issue Recommendation Section

VFDs are not


Install VFDs on all pumps and
Pumps and Motors present on all 5.1
motors.
pumps and motors.

Ventilation Demand Control Install CO2 sensor for DCV 5.2


Ventilation (DCV) is throughout the entire building.
not in place
throughout the
entire building.

Vending Machine The existing vending Replace with an Energy Star 5.3
machine is not rated vending machine.
Energy Star rated.

Lighting

The lighting systems within Erin Fire Station No. 10 consists of fluorescent lighting throughout the building
with LED and HPS wall packs located at the exterior. The lighting system is assumed to be entirely
occupant controlled.

The fluorescent and HPS fixtures currently in use are inefficient and it is recommended that they are
replaced with LED alternatives. A lighting upgrade would reduce energy consumption and utility costs.
These upgrades are discussed further in Section 6.0 of the report. Refer to Figure 1-3 and Table 1-4.

Figure 1-2 Estimated Breakdown of Annual Lighting Energy Consumption

Lighting
7%

Other
93%

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 6 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 1-4 Lighting Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 10

Lighting
Issue Recommendation Section
Type

HPS and fluorescent lighting


HPS and LED lighting retrofit. 6.1
fixtures are significantly less
Fluorescent
efficient than LEDs.

Install occupancy sensors to


Controls Some lighting on site is 6.2
switch controlled. control the lighting.

Building Envelope

This building envelope was reviewed including the windows, exterior cladding and all entrances and exits.
These building systems are subject to air and heat leakage as well as moisture infiltration. Pinchin
recommends ongoing maintenance to ensure the building envelope is in good condition.

The wall system which consists corrugated metal panels and metal panels with sections of rough and
smooth finished architectural stone cladding. The exterior cladding was observed to be in fair to good
condition with minor section of moisture staining observed at the architectural stone cladding. Moisture
degrades the performance of the insulation resulting in a lower R value. Pinchin recommends repairs to
the cladding be completed to maintain the integrity of the building envelope.

The window system of the Site Building consists of aluminum framed punched windows with horizontally
sliding Insulated Glazed units (IGUs). The windows are reportedly original to the building construction
circa 2012 and therefore are approximately 7 years old. As the existing windows are assumed to offer
basic thermal performance, Pinchin recommends upon reaching their Projected Useful Life (PUL), that
they are replaced with modern IGU systems to offer improved thermal performance.

The main entrance doors of the Site Building consist of prefinished aluminum framed door and frame
assemblies with Insulated Glazing units (IGUs). A secondary entrance door consists of an aluminum
framed door with an IGU insert and sidelite. The service doors consist of hollow metal doors within metal
frames. In addition, there are three (3) metal sectional overhead doors. The doors are in generally in good
condition, with no major issues reported or observed. It is expected that maintenance and periodic repairs
of the exterior doors will be completed as required.

The roof of the fire hall was found to consist of a low-sloped metal roofing system with a “near-flat” roof
section that consists of a single-ply TPO membrane. The roof systems are reportedly original to the
construction of the Site Buildings. The metal roofs appeared to be in generally good condition with no
observed signs of moisture infiltration. Pinchin recommends that while the completing the replacement of

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 7 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

roof systems when they reach their PUL, that supplemental insulation be installed to improve the overall
thermal performance. Regular maintenance and condition reviews are recommended.

Refer to Table 1-5Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference. for Building Envelope
Recommendations.

Table 1-5 Building Envelope Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 10

Area Issue Recommendation Section

Windows Windows are standard double Replace with high efficiency IGUs or
7.1
glazing. Triple glazed assemblies.

Continue conducting routine


Insufficient maintenance can lead to
Facility inspections and ongoing 7.2
unidentified issues.
maintenance.

2.0 UTILITY INFORMATION

The Erin Community Centre makes use of electricity, natural gas, propane and water. Monthly electricity
data consumption data was provided for November 2016 to December 2018. Natural gas data was
provided for the period of December 2016 to May 2019.

The date range for the various utilities do not align with each other. For an energy audit it is important to
be able to compare utility data for the same months; therefor, Pinchin will only analyze data from January
2017 to December 2018.

The utility consumption tables have been provided in Appendix I of the report.

Annual Utility Cost Breakdown

Analyzing annual costs of utilities is essential to prioritizing energy conservation measures. Figure 2-1
shows a breakdown of the average annual utility costs at Erin Fire Station No. 10. Electricity consumption
accounts for 69% ($7,495) of annual utility costs and natural gas accounts for 31% ($3,320). Electricity
consumption is assumed to be higher than natural gas as it is associated with a greater range of
applications such as the ice plant, lighting and plug loads. The combined average annual cost for all
utilities is $10,815. Pinchin has identified conservation measures for each utility which will be discussed in
later sections of the report.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 8 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-1 Breakdown of Average Annual Utility Costs

Natural Gas,
$3,320 , 31%

Electricity,
$7,495 , 69%

Energy Consumption

2.2.1 Energy Consumption Summary

On-site energy is provided by electricity and natural gas for the Site Building. Figure 2-2 provides a
summary of annual electricity, natural gas, and total energy consumption for the period from 2017 to 2018
for Erin Fire Station No. 10.

Figure 2-2: Annual Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Erin Fire Station No. 10

Average
Year

2018

2017

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450


Energy Consumption (GJ)
Total Natural Gas Electricity

Figure 2-3 shows the monthly electricity and natural gas consumption, both converted to gigajoules to
allow for comparability, from January 2017 to December 2018. The building has a combination of electric

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 9 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

and gas-fired heat sources, which can be seen by the annual peak in consumption from November to
May.

Figure 2-3: Monthly Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Erin Fire Station No. 10

70

60
Energy Consumption (GJ)

50

40

30

20

10

0
Apr‐17
May‐17

Jul‐17
Aug‐17

Oct‐17
Nov‐17
Dec‐17

Apr‐18
May‐18

Jul‐18
Aug‐18

Oct‐18
Nov‐18
Dec‐18
Mar‐17

Mar‐18
Jan‐17
Feb‐17

Jun‐17

Sep‐17

Jan‐18
Feb‐18

Jun‐18

Sep‐18
Month
Electricity (GJ) Gas (GJ)

Electricity is used on Site for supplemental heating, ventilation, lighting and plug loads. The average
monthly consumption is 11 GJ. The seasonal averages were compared, with the winter having the
highest average with 13.7 GJ and summer having the lowest average with 7.6 GJ. The winter electricity
consumption was approximately 1.8 times higher than the summer consumption. This reflects the
operation of the electric heating during the fall and winter months which increases the electricity
consumption.

Natural gas is used on Site for space heating and domestic hot water heating. The average monthly
consumption is 19 GJ. The seasonal averages were compared, with the winter having the highest
average with 37 GJ and summer having the lowest average with 0.2 GJ. The winter natural gas
consumption was approximately 158 times higher than the summer consumption. This is as expected as
space heating and domestic hot water heating are required less during the summer season.

2.2.2 Energy Consumption Analysis

To determine the effects of weather, two regression analyses were performed each for electricity
consumption and natural gas consumption in relation to heating degree days (HDD) and cooling degree
days (CDD). The climate data used was referenced from Historical Climate Data (2019). The first two
analyses looked at the relationship between electricity consumption, heating degree days and cooling

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

degree days.2 The correlation between consumption and HDD/CDD is expressed as the displayed value
of R2. Essentially, this represents the amount of energy used per increase in heating/cooling degree day.
The R2 value does not in any way represent how efficiently the system operates. The results in Figure 2-4
and Figure 2-5 show a moderate and weak linear relationship between HDD, CDD and electricity
consumption. The results indicate that the electricity use is mostly directed to base loads in the building.

Figure 2-4 Electricity and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis

Electricity Consumption Vs HDD


20.0 y = 0.0061x + 8.4301
Electricity Consumption

R² = 0.2854
15.0
(GJ)

10.0

5.0

0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
HDD

Figure 2-5: Electricity and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis

Electricity Consumption Vs CDD


20.0
Electricity Consumption (GJ)

15.0 y = ‐0.0484x + 11.507


R² = 0.2565
10.0

5.0

0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
CDD

The next two analyses’ looked at the relationship between natural gas consumption, heating degree days
and cooling degree days. On a scale of 0% to 100%, the relation between gas consumption and HDD in
Figure 2-6 can be expressed as 75%, which indicates a strong to moderate correlation. The results are
understandable as natural gas is used to for space heating and domestic hot water. The results in

2
A heating degree day is defined as the number of degrees that a day's average temperature is below 18°. If the average outdoor
temperature is 5°C, the corresponding HDD would be 18°C - 5°C = 13°C.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 11 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-7 show a moderate negetive linear relationship between warm outdoor temperatures and natural
gas consumption. This is expected as natural gas use is reduced in the warmer weather.

Figure 2-6: Natural Gas and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis

Gas Consumption Vs HDD y = 0.0617x ‐ 1.5521


70.0 R² = 0.75
Gas Consumption (GJ)

60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
HDD

Figure 2-7: Natural Gas and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis

y = ‐0.4041x + 28.868
Gas Consumption Vs CDD R² = 0.4411
70.0
Gas Consumption (GJ)

60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
CDD

The regression analysis for electricity and cooling degree days reflects that the building has no cooling
system in place.

Figure 2-8 shows the relationship between electricity consumption, natural gas consumption, HDDs and
CDDs on a monthly basis. The graph illustrates a rise in electricity consumption accompanying a rise in
HDDs.

Figure 2-8: Electricity Consumption and Cooling Degree Days

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 12 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

70.0 900
800
Energy Consumption (GJ)

60.0
700
50.0
600

HDD & CDD


40.0 500
30.0 400
300
20.0
200
10.0 100
0.0 0

Nov‐17

Nov‐18
Mar‐17

Mar‐18
Jan‐17
Feb‐17

Apr‐17
May‐17
Jun‐17
Jul‐17
Aug‐17
Sep‐17
Oct‐17

Dec‐17
Jan‐18
Feb‐18

Apr‐18
May‐18
Jun‐18
Jul‐18
Aug‐18

Dec‐18
Sep‐18
Oct‐18
Months
Gas (GJ) Electricity (GJ) HDD CDD

3.0 ENERGY CONSUMPTION BENCHMARKING

Introduction to Energy Use Intensity

Energy use intensity (EUI) is a standard metric for energy consumption in buildings. The EUI is calculated
as a buildings annual energy consumption divided by its gross floor area. Normalizing the energy usage
for area allows for comparison between buildings and indicates relative performance.

The EUI is a limited metric as it is not normalized for other building characteristics such as climate zone.
To account for this limitation, the report will refer to ASHRAE Standard 100-2015 Energy target which
factors in building activity type, occupancy and climate zone. The targets “represent the 25th bottom (low
energy) percentile of energy use by each building category”3. The ASHRAE energy target for Erin Fire
Station No. 10 was determined to be 0.78 GJ/m2/year. Please refer to Appendix V for the assumptions
and calculations.

Energy Use Intensity Analysis

On average, from 2017 to 2018 Erin Fire Station No. 10 consumed 126 GJ of electricity and 232 GJ of
natural gas. This amounts to approximately 358 GJ of annual energy consumption. The gross floor area
is approximately 508 m2 (5,486 sf). The resulting EUI is therefore 0.70 GJ/m2/yr. The calculated EUI is 9%
lower than the ASHRAE energy target of 0.78 GJ/m2/yr.

It is economically feasible to further reduce the Site building’s energy consumption by improving the
efficiency of the building systems. Pinchin’s proposed energy conservation measures aim to reduce the

3
ASHRAE Standard 100-2015

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 13 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

building’s EUI by approximately 23%, resulting in an EUI of 0.54 GJ/m2/yr. The annual energy cost and
maintenance savings associated with achieving the Post-Retrofit EUI is approximately $1,345.

Figure 3-1 EUI Comparison between Erin Fire Station No. 10 and ASHRAE EUI Target

0.90

0.80
Energy Usage Intensity (GJ/m2/year)

0.78
0.70
0.70
0.60

0.50 0.54

0.40

0.30

0.20

0.10


Site Building (Current EUI) ASHRAE Target EUI Site Building (Post
Retrofits)

Pinchin recommends installing submeters at major energy systems so a further cost analysis can be
performed, and more savings identified.

Actual Energy Use Breakdown

Pinchin generated an energy use breakdown for Erin Fire Station No. 10 with information collected on site
as well as previous building reports, equipment specifications and utility bill data provided by the client. In
the case of missing information, Pinchin made assumptions based on ice rink energy consumption
patterns. As seen in Figure 3-2, space heating accounts for 72% of energy consumed within the facility
and the ice rink accounts for 18%. Energy conservation measures are therefore concentrated primarily on
heating load reduction and refrigeration load reductions.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 14 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 3-2 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Erin Fire Station No. 10
Other Equipment, 27.9,
7.80%
Kitchen, 13.1, 3.65%
Plug Load, 15.4, 4.30%

Lighting, 25.5, 7.13%

DHW, 8.6, 2.39%


Ventilation, 10.0, 2.80%

Heating, 257.6, 71.93%

Table 3-1 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Erin Fire Station No. 10

System Assumed Energy Consumption (GJ) Percentage

Heating 257.6 71.9%

Ventilation 10.0 2.8%

DHW 8.6 2.4%

Lighting 25.5 7.1%

Plug Load 15.4 4.3%

Kitchen 13.1 3.6%

Other Equipment 27.9 7.8%

4.0 HVAC RECOMMENDATIONS

The major HVAC equipment installed at Erin Fire Station No. 10 is listed in Error! Not a valid bookmark
self-reference.. A description of the existing HVAC system along with a detailed equipment list can be
found in Appendix III of the report.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 15 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 4-1 Major HVAC Equipment in Use at Erin Fire Station No. 10

Heating PUL Remaining


Make Model # Function Condition
Input Lifespan
Lennox "Elite" 100,000 Space Heating - Good 25 18
Btuh* Furnace
Federal Pioneer N27-58 485 W Space Good 25 5
Ltd. Conditioning -
EBH
Federal Pioneer N27-208 2000W Space Good 15 5
Ltd. Conditioning -
EBH
Unknown Unknown 2000 W Space Heating - Good 15 5
FFH
Stelpro Unknown 5,000 W Space Heating - Good 15 5
UH
Gas Mac Unknown 125,000 Space Heating - IR Good 18 10
Btuh
Giant 172STE-3S8M- 4,500 W DHW Heating Good 12 11
E8
*Assumed Value

Programmable Thermostats Installation

The individual HVAC equipment is controlled by either programmable thermostats or manual standalone
thermostats. The Site Representative reported that the there was no thermostat program schedule in
place. During our Site Visit, the heating set point and setback were observed to be between 20-22°C (68-
72°F).

In the winter, it is recommended to set the thermostat to 20°C (68°F) during operating hours and 18°C
(65°F) degrees after hours. Each degree Fahrenheit raised in the summer or lowered in the winter
represents up to 3% of energy savings. Based on our observations, Pinchin assumed that the Site
Building can reduce its setback during winter by 1.7°C (3°F).

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 16 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 4-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with the installation of programmable at Erin
Fire Station No. 10

Annual
Demand Annual System Incentives Simple
Energy
Implement Reduction Savings Cost Available Payback
Savings
(GJ) ($) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.002 19.9 149 5,500 0 37

Potential incentives available from the Enbridge “Commercial Custom


Incentive Details Retrofit Program” for $0.15/m3 natural gas saved. Free assessment available
through Enbridge.

*Note: The above assumptions are contingent on revised occupant behaviour as the occupant control the
thermostats.

IR Tube Heater – Two Stage Replacement

The existing IR tube heaters are one stage, low intensity models and can only provide a heating output at
one power level We recommend installing new two stage IR tube heaters which are capable of providing
two different heating outputs. This measure is predicted to reduce the relevant gas consumption by about
12% and will reduce ongoing maintenance costs. Refer to Table 4-3.

Table 4-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with IR tube heater replacement at the Erin
Fire Station No. 10

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

At end of PUL 0.03 20 100 20,000 0 201

Potential incentives available from the Enbridge “Commercial Custom Retrofit


Incentive Details Program” for $0.15/m3 natural gas saved. Free assessment available through
Enbridge.

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

DHW Heater - Heat Pump Replacement

The existing electric DHW is high efficiency but not enough to achieve the energy star standard. Pinchin
recommends that the units are replaced at the end of their PUL with a heat pump system which can use
up to 65% less electricity. If a heat-pump DHW heater is not preferred, the second-best option would be
an electric tankless heater which can reduce energy consumption by 14% by eliminating standby heat
loss.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 17 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Refer to Table 4-4.

Table 4-4 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Erin Fire
Station No. 10

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.01 5 166 5,000 2,148 17

IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh


Incentive Details
of Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

Install Sub-Meters at the Major Mechanical Equipment.

Based on information gathered on Site, there are no sub meters installed on the major HVAC equipment.
It is highly recommended that the sub-meters be installed and recorded on a regular basis to track energy
consumption. Sub-metering will not save energy but will help identify energy consumption trends and
quantify opportunities for savings with improved accuracy.

5.0 PUMPS AND MOTORS RECOMMENDATIONS

The pumps and motors installed at Erin Fire Station No. 10 is listed in The major HVAC equipment
installed at Erin Fire Station No. 10 is listed in Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference.. A
description of the existing HVAC system along with a detailed equipment list can be found in Appendix III
of the report.

Table 4-1. A description of the existing pumps and motors along with a detailed equipment list can be
found in Appendix III of the report.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 18 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 5-1 Pumps and Motors in Use at Erin Fire Station No. 10

Remaining
Make Model # Capacity Function Condition PUL
Lifespan
Mako BAM06H 10 HP BAM Good 18 Unknown
Compressor
Canarm Unknown 1/3 HP Exhaust Fan (1) Fair* 20 Unknown
Ventilateur Unknown 1/3 HP Exhaust Fan (2- Fair* 20 Unknown
3)
Unknown Unknown 120 W Ceiling Exhaust Fair* 20 Unknown
Fan (1-2)
Unknown Unknown 120 W Ceiling Fan (1) Fair* 20 Unknown
Unknown Unknown 60 W Washroom Fair* 20 Unknown
Exhaust Fans
(1-2)
*Assumed Value

Installation Variable Flow Drive (VFDs) on Pumps and Variable Speed Drives (VSDs) Fan
Motors

Installing a VFD to control the remaining pumps and motors would significantly reduce the amount of
energy consumed by reducing the motor’s operating speed and operating capacity in relation to the
demand within the facility.

The costs and savings have not been included for this measure as they could not be calculated with
confidence. VFDs reduce the operating power of the pumps to meet demand, as a result the components
experience less wear and tear, prolonging their PUL and reducing maintenance costs. This measure is
expected to yield some energy savings; no comfort savings are expected to be obtained.

Demand Control Ventilation

The existing ventilation system does not appear to have CO2 sensors on all equipment and is assumed
to operate at pre-set ventilation rates, typically based on the maximum occupancy level of the building. As
the occupancy level fluctuates continuously, energy is wasted when the occupancy drops below these
pre-determined rates. An even larger source of electricity waste is the 24/7 operation of the truck bay
ceiling exhaust fans.

Demand Control Ventilation (DCV) ventilates as well as condition the air during heating periods, based on
the occupancy level at any specific time. CO2 sensors are used to monitor air quality and provide real-
time feedback to the controls. The controls then adjust the fan speed, modifying the ventilation rates to
suit the number of occupants in the building.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 19 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

The client intends to install a Nederman vehicle exhaust extraction system with a motor drive. Pinchin
recommends connecting the drive to include CO2 sensors. The costs and savings have not been
included for this measure as they could not be calculated with confidence. This measure is expected to
yield energy, thermal comfort and maintenance benefits. Pinchin recommends further investigate using
an energy modelling software program.

Vending Machine – Energy Star Refurbishment

The existing vending machine is a standard efficiency model. An Energy Star model can save 40% on
energy consumption through more efficient compressors, fan motors and lighting systems. The Energy
Star machines also incorporate a low power mode for periods of low occupancy.

Refer to Table 5-2.

Table 5-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Erin Fire
Station No. 10

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.002 4.35 135 3,000 0 22

Incentive Details N/A

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

6.0 LIGHTING RECOMMENDATIONS

Light Fixture Retrofit

The majority of interior lighting at the Site Building is assumed to be a mixture of the following:

 2’x4’ recessed troffers with one to four 32W T8 fluorescent tube lamps and electronic
ballasts;

 1’x4’ surface mount troffers with one to two 32W T8 fluorescent tube lamps and
electronic ballasts;

 8' suspended fixtures with two 60W T5 fluorescent tube lamps;

 LED and CFL pot lights;

 Exterior 150W W HPS wall pack; and

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 20 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

 Exterior CFL and LED pot lights.

While the fluorescent T8s are efficient compared to older T12 lights, modern LED T8s are 63% more
efficient than the equivalent fluorescent lamp [going from 32 W to 12W]. The LED pot lights are
approximately 30% more efficient than their CFL counterparts.

Figure 6-1 Energy consumption comparison of existing and proposed lighting.

30.0
25.5
25.0
Consumption (GJ)
Annual Electrical

20.0

15.0 11.3
10.0

5.0


Current Lighting System Proposed Lighting System

The LED retrofit will allow for less maintenance due to their improved longevity when compared to
fluorescent and incandescent fixtures. As the cost and lifespan of fixtures will fluctuate, the payback
period will not factor in maintenance related savings. Pinchin does not expect comfort/health benefits to
be obtained.

As outlined in Figure 7-1, the recommended improvements to the lighting system are expected to reduce
annual electricity consumption by up to 14 GJ, and the power demand by up to 0.12 GJ. These
reductions translate to $441 in annual savings. Table 6-1 outlines the estimated costs, savings and
incentives associated with implementing the recommended lighting upgrades at Erin Fire Station No. 10.

Table 6-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with lighting retrofit at Erin Fire Station No.
10

Annual
Demand Annual System Incentives
Energy Simple Payback
Implement Reduction Savings Cost Available
Savings (years)
(GJ) ($) ($) ($)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.01 14 441 12,578 1,557 25

Incentive Details IESO “Retrofit Program”: $400/kW of Demand Savings

Note: Assumes an average of 2.34 weekly operating hours for low use rooms, and 12 hours for exterior
lighting (7 days a week).

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 21 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 6-2 summarizes the type and quantity of lights existing lighting system and the proposed lighting
system for the Site Building.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 22 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 6-2 Summary of Existing and Proposed Lighting Fixtures on Site

Watts Lamps Present Annual Proposed Proposed Proposed Annual


Hrs of # of
Area Type per per Demand Consum. Lighting Watts Demand Savings
OPR Fixtures
Lamp Fixture (kW) (kWh) System Lamp (kW) (kWh)
W.R 4' Recessed Linear 800 32 1 6 0.19 154 4' LED T8 12 0.07 96
Fluorescent T8
W.R CFL A19 Bulb 1320 13 1 2 0.03 34 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.02 11
Closets LED A19 Bulb 132 9 1 1 0.01 1 0.01 0
CFL A19 Bulb 132 13 1 1 0.01 2 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.01 1
Banquet 4' Recessed Linear 520 32 4 9 1.15 599 4' LED T8 12 0.43 374
Space Fluorescent T8
CFL A19 Bulb 520 13 1 8 0.10 54 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.07 17
Offices 4' Recessed Linear 800 32 2 2 0.13 102 4' LED T8 12 0.05 64
Fluorescent T8
Kitchen 4' Recessed Linear 52 32 2 10 0.64 33 4' LED T8 12 0.24 21
Fluorescent T8
Hallways 4' Surface Mount Linear 1320 32 2 4 0.26 338 4' LED T8 12 0.10 211
Fluorescent T8
4' Surface Mount Linear 1320 32 4 20 2.56 3379 4' LED T8 12 0.96 2112
Fluorescent T8
Incandescent A19 Bulb 1320 60 1 1 0.06 79 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.01 67
Truck 8' Surface Mount Linear 800 60 2 2 0.24 192 8' LED T8 25 0.10 112
Bay Fluorescent T8

8' Surface Mount Linear 800 60 2 4 0.48 384 8' LED T8 25 0.20 224
Fluorescent T8
Storage 4' Surface Mount Linear 200 32 2 4 0.26 51 4' LED T8 12 0.10 32
Building Fluorescent T8
Exterior LED Wall Pack 4380 40 1 3 0.12 526 0.12 0
HPS Wall Pack 4380 150 1 1 0.15 657 LED Wall Pack 40 0.04 482
CFL Pot Light 4380 13 1 7 0.09 399 LED Bulb 9 0.06 123
LED Pot Light 4380 6 1 4 0.02 105 0.02 0
Total 7 7,089 3 3,946

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 23 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Motion Controlled Light Switch Installation

The lighting systems at Erin Fire Station No. 10 are generally occupant controlled. Pinchin recommends
installing more motion detecting light switches to control the lighting throughout the entire building. The
motion detectors reduce energy loss due to lights being left on in unoccupied rooms. One demerit of
motion controlled light switches is that they will continue operation of the lighting system for 90 seconds
after the occupant has left the area. These systems also consume energy 24/7 to remain in standby
mode.

Table 6-3 outlines the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with implementing the motion
controlled light switch upgrades after the LED lighting retrofit at Erin Fire Station No. 10.

Table 6-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with Motion Controlled Light Switch installation
at Erin Fire Station No. 10

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.003 3.4 105 440 0 3

Incentive Details IESO “Retrofit Program”: $400/kW of Demand Savings; $1500 minimum

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already in
place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

7.0 BUILDING ENVELOPE RECOMMENDATIONS

Window Retrofit

Pinchin completed a review of the current window systems throughout the building during the on-Site
review. Window assemblies are mostly from construction of the original building (2013).

Pinchin used the software Lbnl Window to calculate the overall U-value of the current windows. The heat
loss from existing windows were calculated as 20.9 GJ, resulting in $160 of associated utility costs.

Pinchin has modelled the heat transfer for two different types of replacement windows. The first proposed
option is a full replacement with double glazed window systems with an adjusted U-value of 1.40 W/m2K,
as mandated by Energy Star for Climate Zone 2. The replacement windows are anticipated as being vinyl
framed.

The second proposed option is a full replacement with triple glazed window systems with an adjusted U-
value of 0.8 W/m2K. The replacement windows are anticipated as being vinyl framed.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 24 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

The analysis used an average of the 2017 and 2018 climate and energy data to determine potential
energy savings. The new double glazing and triple glazing windows would have only accounted for 505
GJ and 3.2 GJ respectively. The associated annual energy cost is approximately $40 for double glazing
windows and $24 for triple glazing windows. The proposed systems would result in 60% and 78% less
heat loss than the old windows and an annual savings of $116 and $133 respectively (refer to Figure 8-1).

Figure 7-1 Energy consumption comparison of existing DG windows and proposed DG and Triple
glazing window replacement

25.0
20.9
20.0
Consumption (GJ)
Annual Electricity

15.0

10.0
5.5
5.0 3.2


Existing Glazing New Double Glazing Triple Glazing

Table 7-1 and Table 7-2 outline the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with implementing
the recommended window upgrades at Erin Fire Station No. 10.

Table 7-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with full DG window replacement at Erin Fire
Station No. 10

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Phased as ex. units


N/A 15.4 116 8,048 0 70
achieve their PUL

Incentive Details Potential incentives available from the Enbridge “Commercial Custom
Retrofit Program” for $0.15/m3 natural gas saved. Free assessment available
through Enbridge.

Note: Assumes 36 sm of window replacement with an allowance of $60 per square foot.
Assumes 5,688 ft2 of an exterior grade sealant applied to perimeter window frames with an allowance of
$6 per linear foot.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 25 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 7-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with full triple glazing window replacement at
Erin Fire Station No. 10

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Phased as ex. units


N/A 17.8 133 10,465 0 78
achieve their PUL

Incentive Details Potential incentives available from the Enbridge “Commercial Custom
Retrofit Program” for $0.15/m3 natural gas saved. Free assessment available
through Enbridge.

Note: Assumes 36 sm of window replacement with an allowance of $85 per square foot.
Assumes 92sm of an exterior grade sealant applied to perimeter window frames with an allowance of $6
per linear foot.

Continued Inspections

Pinchin recommends regular building condition inspections to prevent against deteriorations going
unknown. Ongoing preventative maintenance ensures small-scale deficiencies are addressed before they
lead to a large-scale capital projects being required premature to the end of their lifespan.

Bi-monthly roof inspections should be conducted to ensure the following:

 Eavestroughs area continuous, secured firmly in place and clear of debris: and

 Signs of water infiltration should be identified and remediated.

Eavestroughs are particularly susceptible to damage in the winter months. Water can infiltrate into the
flashing edges, expands during the freeze temperatures and thaw, leaving behind gaps allowing water to
penetrate further into the roof system. Pinchin expects this measure to yield energy savings; however, no
comfort or maintenance benefits are expected.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 26 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

8.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

The following table is a summary of the major utility saving projects identified for Erin Fire Station No. 10.

Annual Annual Annual Annual Est.


Potential Est.
Electrical Gas GHG Cost Est. Grant
Recommendation Savings Payback
Savings Savings Savings Savings Cost ($) Incentive
(%) (Yrs.)
(GJ) (GJ) (Kg) ($) ($)
4.1 Programmable 1.9 18
Thermostats (529 kWh) (484 m3) 245 149 15% 5,500 0 37
Installation
4.2 IR Tube Heater - 19.9
Two Stage (534m3) 1,034 100 78% 20,000 0 201
Replacement
4.3 DHW Heater - 5.6
Heat Pump (150 m3) 278 166 21% 5,000 2,148 17
Replacement
5.2 Vending Machine - 4.4
Energy Star (1,209 kWh) 334 135 17% 3,000 0 22
Replacement
7.1 Lighting Retrofit 14.2 1,089 441 56% 12,578 1,557 25
(3,946 kWh)
7.2 Motion Controlled 3.4
(943 kWh) 260 105 13% 440 0 4
Light Switches
8.1 DG Window 1.5 13.9
(409 kWh) (374 m3) 838 116 60% 8,048 0 70
Replacement
8.2 TG Window 1.7 16.1
(472 kWh) (432 m3) 967 133 70% 10,465 0 78
Replacement

9.0 DISCARDED CONSIDERATIONS

Pinchin considered and rejected the following recommendations due to their low return on investment.

Install a Digital BAS (Building Automation System)

As previously mentioned, ventilation and space heating within the facility area provided controlled via a
combination of digital and pneumatic thermostats.

The installation of a BAS will allow the Building manager to optimize the efficiency and accuracy of all wall
mounted thermostats, exhaust fans and the ice plant. It would be possible to achieve the desired space
conditions faster than before and reduce the amount of space heating required. This measure is expected
to provide energy savings and comfort benefits Table 10-1 outlines the estimated savings associated with
the pneumatic to digital BAS conversion at the Erin Fire Station No. 10. This measure will reduce the
HVAC energy consumption by about 15%.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 27 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 9-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with pneumatic to DDC conversion at the Erin
Fire Station No. 10

Demand Annual Energy Annual Incentives Simple


System
Implement Reduction Savings Savings Available Payback
Cost ($)
(GJ) (GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.002 20 183 25,000 0 136


Potential incentives available from the Enbridge “Commercial Custom Retrofit
Incentive Details Program” for $0.15/m3 natural gas saved. Free assessment available through
Enbridge.
Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

A digital BAS will provide long term benefits:

 More information for intelligent building management;

 Lower energy costs through better operating efficiency; and

 Lower maintenance cost through less need for calibration and service of the equipment.

The new BAS shall comprise, at minimum, the following components:

 Distributed Control Panels (DCP);

 Unitary Controllers (UC);

 Automation level Local Area Networks (LAN);

 Field instrumentation including intelligent sensors;

 Automatic Digital Control Valves;

 Actuators for automatic valves and motorised dampers (DDC Control);

 Software;

 Cable and containment; and

 All power supplies and conditioners, interlocking and control relays, equipment enclosures
and other components, materials and services required for a completed and fully operational
turnkey BAS installation meeting these specifications.

The BAS shall meet the following general criteria:

 Fully networked;

 Real time;

 Distributed processing; and

 No single point of failure.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 28 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

The new BAS shall be configured to ensure reliability of systems operation and control of critical
functions/systems. Each contractor must verify on their own that the BAS is compatible with the
equipment to be controlled.

Supplemental Roof Insulation

Pinchin completed a review of the roofing system of Site building during the on-Site review. Based on
typical construction methods, observed blisters and reported leaks, Pinchin assumes the current roof
assembly R value (imperial) is approximately R20. Pinchin calculated the heat loss from the roof as
approximately 90 GJ/year, resulting in an annual energy cost of approximately $700.

Pinchin recommends supplementing the insulation levels to reach R40. The additional insulation would
only account for approximately 45 GJ/year based on the 2017-2018 heating degree-days. The associated
annual energy cost is approximately $350. The proposed insulation levels would result in 50% less heat
loss than the existing levels and an annual savings of $350.

Table 9-2 outlines the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with supplementing the roof
insulation levels at Erin Fire Station No. 10. The insulation will also reduce the buildings refrigeration load,
however due to many unknown variables it has not been factored into the savings and payback period.

Table 9-2: Summary of Costs and Savings associated with Supplemental Roof Insulation at Erin
Fire Station No. 10

Implement Demand Annual Annual System Incentives Payback


Reduction Energy Savings Cost ($) Available with
(kW) Savings ($) ($) Incentives
(kWh)

During next roof


N/A 38 286 27,340 0 96
replacement

Incentive Details Potential incentives available from the Enbridge “Commercial Custom
Retrofit Program” for $0.15/m3 natural gas saved. Free assessment available
through Enbridge.

Supplemental Wall Insulation

Pinchin completed a review of the exterior wall system of Site building during the on-Site review. Based
on the architectural drawings and construction methods in the 2013, Pinchin assumes the current wall
assembly is R20 on average.

Pinchin calculated the heat loss from the exterior wall system as approximately 107 GJ/year, resulting in
an annual energy cost of approximately $850.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 29 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Pinchin recommends supplementing the insulation levels to reach R40 (with exception of the third floor).
The new insulation levels would only account for approximately 54 GJ/year based on the average 2017-
2018 annual heating degree days. The associated annual energy cost is approximately $425. The
proposed insulation levels would result in 50% less heat loss than the existing levels and an annual
savings of $425.

Table 9-3 outlines the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with supplementing the wall
insulation levels at Erin Fire Station No. 10. Pinchin presents this option aware that it may lead to a loss
of architectural character at the Site Building. We therefore recommend this retrofit to take place when/if
building envelope repairs are required due to the poor thermal performance (i.e. significant cracking).

Table 9-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with supplemental wall insulation at Erin Fire
Station No. 10

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

During building
N/A 44 221 238,677 0 1078
envelope repairs

Incentive Potential incentives available from the Enbridge “Commercial Custom


Retrofit Program” for $0.15/m3 natural gas saved. Free assessment available
through Enbridge.

10.0 NON-FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

Pinchin has also reviewed the potential conservation measures with consideration to non-financial
benefits classified into the following:

1. Potential improvements to health and safety within the Site building.

2. Potential improvements to operational procedures within the Site building.

3. Potential improvements occupant comfort within the Site building.

All energy savings measures that Pinchin considered have been recommended in this report.

11.0 RECOMMENDED ITEMS FOR ASHRAE LEVEL III (CAPITAL GRADE) ENERGY AUDIT

Pinchin recommends a capital grade analysis of the following measures:

 VFDs at pumps and VSDs at motors (Recommendation 5.1)

o Model the reduction in corresponding energy savings.

 Demand Control Ventilation (Recommendation 5.2)

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 30 of 29


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 3, 2019
2 Erinville Drive, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

o Model the reduction in corresponding electricity savings due to reduced exhaust fan
operation.

12.0 TERMS AND LIMITATIONS

This work was performed subject to the Terms and Limitations presented or referenced in the proposal for
this project.

Information provided by Pinchin is intended for Client use only. Pinchin will not provide results or
information to any party unless disclosure by Pinchin is required by law. Any use by a third party of
reports or documents authored by Pinchin or any reliance by a third party on or decisions made by a third
party based on the findings described in said documents, is the sole responsibility of such third parties.
Pinchin accepts no responsibility for damages suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or
actions conducted. No other warranties are implied or expressed.

The information provided in this report is based upon analysis of available documents, analytical results,
records and drawings, and personal contacts and interviews. In performing the assessment, Pinchin has
relied in good faith on information provided by the individuals noted in this report. Pinchin has assumed
that the documents, analytical results, records and drawings, and information provided by the individuals
noted in this report, including information provided in contacts and personal interviews, is factual and
accurate. Pinchin accepts no responsibility for any deficiency, misstatement or inaccuracy contained in
this report as a result of negligence, omissions, misinterpretations or fraudulent acts of persons
interviewed or contacted, or contained in reports that were reviewed, and makes no representation or
warranty as to the qualifications of any such persons or the reliability of information or reports provided by
them, whether or not such persons were introduced to the Client by Pinchin.

Pinchin did not attempt to identify locations of deposition of mould spores or particles, or minor mould
growth that would not exhibit any signs of spotting/staining on building materials. Pinchin would not be
able to identify locations of concealed mould growth within wall cavities and other hidden locations
without performing intrusive inspections. The degree of mould growth noted in the report may change with
time if water or humidity issues continue or develop after the assessment date(s). Any sources of water
infiltration or high humidity must be corrected to prevent the continuation or occurrence of mould growth.
Air sampling results (if any) will apply only to the time and conditions of the testing and may not be used
to reliably predict conditions on other days.
J:\241000s\0241444.000 TofErin,VariousSites,Erin,BSS,BCA\Deliverables\Energy Audits\Final Reports\Erin Fire Hall\241444 FINAL ASHRAE Level II EA, EFH, 2 Erinville
Drive, Erin, ON Oct 3, 2019.docx

Template: Master Report for Energy Audit, BSS, July 3, 2018

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 31 of 29


APPENDIX I
Utility Bill Data
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 3, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Gas (m3)

Jan-17 32 419
Feb-17 31 844
Mar-17 28 1,015
Apr-17 33 555
May-17 32 214
Jun-17 27 70
Jul-17 32 7
Aug-17 31 11
Sep-17 31 1
Oct-17 30 42
Nov-17 29 642
Dec-17 29 886
Jan-18 33 1,568
Feb-18 30 1,033
Mar-18 28 1,113
Apr-18 32 714
May-18 31 268
Jun-18 31 24
Jul-18 29 -
Aug-18 31 -
Sep-18 31 -
Oct-18 30 294
Nov-18 30 1,782
Dec-18 31 958
Jan-19 30 1,048
Feb-19 33 1,332
Mar-19 28 762
Apr-19 30 583
May-19 29

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of


3
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 3, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Electricity (kWh)
Date Duration (Days)
Meter # 2000 5246 1308
2-Dec-16 28 2,180
5-Jan-17 34 2,721
3-Feb-17 29 2,417
4-Mar-17 29 2,416
4-Apr-17 31 2,543
4-May-17 30 2,278
3-Jun-17 30 2,100
6-Jul-17 33 1,933
4-Aug-17 29 1,609
6-Sep-17 33 2,005
4-Oct-17 28 1,703
4-Nov-17 31 2,089
2-Dec-17 28 2,223
5-Jan-18 34 3,079
3-Feb-18 29 2,425
6-Mar-18 31 2,684
6-Apr-18 31 2,860
4-May-18 28 2,414
5-Jun-18 32 1,963
6-Jul-18 31 1,987
4-Aug-18 29 1,606
6-Sep-18 33 1,733
4-Oct-18 28 1,549
6-Nov-18 33 2,118
4-Dec-18 28 2,078
5-Jan-19 32 2,435
5-Feb-19 31 2,552
6-Mar-19 29 2,341
4-Apr-19 29 2,211
4-May-19 30 2,067

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of


3
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 3, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Electricity (kWh)
Date Duration (Days)
Meter # 2000 0656 5049
5-Jan-17 34 344
3-Feb-17 29 1,418
4-Mar-17 29 1,234
4-Apr-17 31 1,334
4-May-17 30 1,261
3-Jun-17 30 1,289
6-Jul-17 33 1,034
4-Aug-17 29 187
6-Sep-17 33 161
4-Oct-17 28 146
4-Nov-17 31 373
2-Dec-17 28 448
5-Jan-18 34 1,291
3-Feb-18 29 1,373
6-Mar-18 31 1,444
6-Apr-18 31 1,427
4-May-18 28 1,051
5-Jun-18 32 246
6-Jul-18 31 118
4-Aug-18 29 93
6-Sep-18 33 126
4-Oct-18 28 163
6-Nov-18 33 291
4-Dec-18 28 673

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 3 of


3
APPENDIX II
Photographs
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 3, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

General view of vehicle exhaust extraction system in the truck bay.

Typical view of recessed light troffer with fluorescent lamps.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of


2
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 3, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

View of the Lennox furnace located in the crawlspace.

Typical view of programmable thermostat located in the meeting room.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of


2
APPENDIX III
Mechanical Equipment List
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 3, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

*Assumed Value

Remaining
Unit Make Model # Output (HP) Cond. PUL Age
Lifespan

Furnace Lennox "Elite" 100,000 Btuh* Good 25 7 18

EBH (1-3) Federal N27-58 485 W Fair - 25 Unknown 5


Pioneer Good
Ltd.

EBH (4-5) Federal N27-208 2000W Fair - 15 Unknown 5


Pioneer Good
Ltd.

FFH (1-3) Unknow Unknown 2000 W Fair - 15 Unknown 5


n Good

Electric Stelpro Unknown 5,000 W Fair - 15 Unknown 5


Suspended Good
UH

IR Heater Gas Unknown 125,000 Btuh Fair - 18 8 10


(1 - 2) Mac Good

DHW 1 Giant 172STE- 4,500 W Good 12 1 11


3S8M-E8

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 2


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 3, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

Pumps and Motors – Erin Fire Station No. 10


*Assumed Value

Output Remaining
Unit Make Model Capacity PUL Age
(HP) Lifespan
BAM Mako BAM06H 10 HP 10 HP Good 18 Unknown
Compressor

Exhaust Canarm Unknown 1/3 HP 1/3 HP Fair* 20 Unknown


Fan (1)

Exhaust Ventilateur Unknown 1/3 HP 1/3 HP Fair* 20 Unknown


Fan (2-3)

Ceiling Unknown Unknown 120 W 120 W Fair* 20 Unknown


Exhaust
Fan (1-2)

Ceiling Fan Unknown Unknown 120 W 120 W Fair* 20 Unknown


(1)

Washroom Unknown Unknown 60 W 60 W Fair* 20 Unknown


Exhaust
Fans (1-2)

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 2


APPENDIX IV
Ranking of Measures
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 3, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Ranking of Measures Appendix IV

Ranking of Measures

Annual Annual Annual Estimated


Annual Potential Estimated
Gas Cost GHG Estimated Grant
Section Recommendation Electrical Savings Payback
Savings Savings Savings Cost ($) Incentive
Savings (GJ) (%/year) (Years)
(GJ) ($) (Tonnes) ($)

7.2 Motion Controlled Light 3.4 260 105 13% 440 0 4


Switches

4.3 DHW Heater - Heat 5.3 278 166 21% 5,000 2,148 17
Pump Replacement

5.2 Vending Machine - 4.4 334 135 17% 3,000 0 22


Energy Star
Replacement

7.1 Lighting Retrofit 14.2 1,089 441 56% 12,578 1,557 25

4.1 Programmable 1.9 1.9 245 149 15% 5,500 0 37


Thermostats
Installation

8.1 DG Window 1.5 13.9 838 116 60% 8,048 0 70


Replacement

8.2 TG Window 1.7 16.1 967 133 70% 10,465 0 78


Replacement

4.2 IR Tube Heater - Two 19.9 1,034 100 78% 20,000 0 201
Stage Replacement

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 1


APPENDIX V
Assumptions and Calculations
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 3, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix V

Calculating Current Loads:

Load Inventory

Assumptions (Based on observed data, drawings or similar products):

Assumed
Assumed input
Annual
Category Description Location Qty Power
Operating
Unit
Hours

DHW DHW Heater Janitor's Closet 1 488 4,500 W


Portable
Heating Truck Bay 1 200 1,500 W
Heater
Heating EBH 0 3 392 485 W
Heating EBH 0 2 392 2,000 W
Heating FFH 0 3 392 2,000 W
Heating Stelpro 0 1 392 1,000 W
IR Tube
Heating 0 2 628 125,000 Btuh
Heaters
Heating Furnace 0 1 628 100,000 Btuh
Kitchen Stove Kitchen 1 Annual Input 505,000 W
Kitchen Kettle Kitchen 1 52 180 W
Kitchen Fridge Kitchen 1 2628 690 W
Kitchen Cooler Kitchen 1 2628 426 W
Kitchen Microwave Kitchen 1 52 1,200 W
Coffee
Kitchen Kitchen 1 52 900 W
Maker
Toaster
Kitchen Kitchen 1 52 1,380 W
Oven
Other BAM
Old Pump House 1 1040 10 HP
Equipment Compressor
Plug Load TV Meeting Room 1 156 228 W
Plug Load Stereo Meeting Room 1 156 270 W
Plug Load DVD Player Meeting Room 1 156 10 W
Plug Load Speakers Meeting Room 1 156 240 W
Plug Load Projecter Meeting Room 1 156 300 W
Internet
Plug Load Offices 1 8760 20 W
Modem
Plug Load Laptop Offices 1 800 45 W
Plug Load Computer Offices 1 800 30 W
Plug Load Monitor Offices 1 800 180 W
Plug Load Shredder Offices 1 800 70 W
Printer
Plug Load Offices 1 52 44 W
(small)

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 4


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 3, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix V

Plug Load Radio Offices 3 200 400 W


Plug Load Phone Offices 3 800 2 W
Base Station
Plug Load Offices 1 800 100 W
Radio
Battery
Plug Load Offices 2 800 10 W
Charger
Plug Load Laptop Old Pump House 1 800 45 W
Garage Door
Plug Load Truck Bay 3 200 1 HP
Openers
Vending
Plug Load Truck Bay 1 2628 1,150 W
Machine
Plug Load Stereo Truck Bay 1 200 270 W
Ventilation Hood fan Kitchen 1 52 1/3 HP
Ventilation Exhaust Fan Old Pump House 3 1040 1/3 HP
Ventilation Fan 0 2 8760 120 W
Ventilation Ceiling Fan 0 1 488 120 W
W.R.
Ventilation Exhaust 0 2 488 60 W
Fans

 Sample Calculation:
8 5 52 30
7

Individual Mechanical Equipment Loads

 Assumptions:

 All equipment loads with unknown operating hours will operate with equal proportion, except
heating.

 Heating equipment only operates during heating season, as determined by the portion of
Brampton HDDs from 2017 to 2018 (i.e. 94%).

 The portion of the energy that a piece of equipment uses is equal to its demand multiplied by
the seasonal proportion of their use and divided by the sum of all demands using that same
utility (gas/electric) whose annual loads do not have assumed operating hours (i.e. lighting,
elevators, standalone coolers and freezers and office equipment plug loads).

 The portion of the energy that a piece of non-seasonal equipment uses is equal to its demand
divided by the sum of all non-seasonal equipment demands using that same utility
(gas/electric) whose annual loads are have NOT known/previously assumed, multiplied by
100% subtracted by the sum of all seasonal proportions for the corresponding utility.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 4


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 3, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix V

 The overall energy use is equal to the calculated portion of energy consumption for a piece of
equipment multiplied by the annual average for the corresponding utility.

Energy Conservation Recommendations

Program Thermostats

 Assumptions:
 Programmable thermostats have historically been set to 68°F in the summer and 68°F in the
winter.

 The new thermostat program will involve reducing the heating setback to 65°F degrees.

 The total annual heating load is 643 GJ.

 Calculation:
8 16
68°F 78°F 3% 68°F 85°F 3%
24 24
39
14 10
68°F 68°F 3% 68°F 65°F 3%
24 24
643
IR Tube Heater – 2 Stage Replacement

 Assumptions:
 Retrofit will improve reduce IR Tube heating demand by 12%

 Calculation:
12% 173

DHW heater Replacement

 Assumptions:
 Two Existing DHW heaters have an efficiency of 91-93%.

 New DHW heaters will have an efficiency of 96%.

 The energy input of the new DHW will be lower in relation to the improved efficiency (will
preserving the existing output).

 The Drain Heat Recovery Retrofit is already in place and reducing the energy from the DHW
heaters by 14%.

 Calculation:

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 3 of 4


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 3, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix V

. 1 14% .

Building Envelope Heat Loss

 Calculation:
24

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 4 of 4


FINAL
Energy Audit -
ASHRAE Level II
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario

Prepared for:

Town of Erin
5684 Trafalgar Rd.
Hillsburgh, ON N0B 1Z0

Attention: Ursula D’Angelo


Director of Finance

September 30, 2019

Pinchin File: 241444

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd.


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Issued to: Town of Erin


Contact: Ursula D’Angelo
Director of Finance
Issued on: September 30, 2019
Pinchin File: 241444
Issuing Office: Mississauga, ON
Primary Pinchin Contact: Melissa Anastacio, P.Eng., LEED AP
905.363.1434
manastacio@pinchin.com

Author: Ms. Carleen Lawson, MBSc, BAS


Project Technologist
289.971.7431
clawson@pinchin.com

Reviewer: Mr. Paul Frasie, M.Eng., P.Eng., LEED Green Associate


Senior Project Manager
905.363.1457
pfrasie@pinchin.com

Reviewer: Mr. Ahmed Alyousif, PhD., P.Eng.


Director, Building Science and Sustainability
905.363.1459
aalyousif@pinchin.com

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page i


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Pinchin Ltd. (Pinchin) was retained by Town of Erin to conduct an energy audit of the Erin Community
Centre located at 14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario.

The purpose of the energy audits is to identify how energy is used on site and how to maximize available
funds across the best energy conservation measures. To achieve the greatest energy reduction, the
Client would like to implement a series of energy conservation measures (ECMs).

This report provides an analysis of historical energy data at the Town of Erin building located at 14
Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario, to determine the effects of weather, billing abnormalities and analyze current
energy and water systems. Energy consumption data is summarized by end use such as lighting, heating,
cooling, ventilation and plug loads. Energy conservation measures for the subject building are
summarized based on the information gathered during Pinchin’s facility audit and information provided by
the client.

Annual Annual Annual Annual


Potential Est.
Annual Electrical Gas Water GHG Cost Est. Est. Grant
Recommendation Savings Payback
Savings (GJ) Savings Saving Savings Savings Cost ($) Incentive ($)
(%) (Yrs.)
(GJ) s (m3) (Kg) ($)

Programmable
119 19
4.1 Thermostats 10,136 1,498 1.9% 9,000 3,511 3.7
(33,081 kWh) (519 m3)
Installation
561
27
4.2 BAS Installation (15.052 31,262 4,590 8.3% 274,000 14,917 56
(7,631 kWh)
m3)
258
107
4.3 RTU Replacement (6,928 21,608 4,977 5.1% 120,000 10,134 22
(29,670 kWh)
m3)
MUA Replacement - 439
8
4.4 High Efficiency (11.777 23,435 2,494 6.3% 100,000 17,209 33
(2,257 kWh)
Replacement m3)
67
4.5 Boiler Replacement (1,811 3,508 338 0.9% 30,000 2,874 80
m3)
IR Tube Heater - Two 7
4.6 387 37 0.1% 10,000 0 268
Stage Replacement (200 m3)
Unit Heater - 6
4.7 Condensing (1,702 334 32 0.1% 5,000 0 155
Replacement m3)
622
Drain Heat Recovery
4.8 (16,701 32,350 3,119 8.7% 20,000 10,000 3.2
Retrofit
m3)
DHW Heater - 63
4.9 3,416 329 0.9% 40,000 3,824 109.9
Tankless Replacement (173 m3)
1,703
4.1 Ice plant - Heat
(45,731 88,582 11,499 24.0% 70,000 35,000 3.0
0 Recovery
m3)
Brine Pump VFD 69
5.1 5,283 2,281 1.0% 20,000 1,914 7.9
Installation (19,141 kWh)
Brine Pump - Program 17
5.2 1,335 616 0.2% 5,000 0 8.1
Temperature Setbacks (4,836 kWh)
5.3 Zamboni Replacement 15 800 641 0.2% 100,000 0 156

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page ii


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

(4,902
m3)
40
Domestic Water Fixture
6.1 (1,061 1,370 2,055 5,635 0.6% 4,400 1,098 0.6
Retrofits
m3)
175
7.1 Lighting Retrofit 13,416 6,026 2.5% 80,000 9,470 11.7
(48,608 kWh)
Motion Controlled Light 20
7.2 1,525 703 0.3% 3,000 0 4.3
Switches (5,524kWh)
8.1 DG Window 2 31
1,791 223 0.5% 37,000 0 166
.1 Replacement (591 kWh) (413 m3)
8.1 42
TG Window 3
.2 (1,125 2,396 298 0.6% 48,000 0 161
Replacement (790 kWh)
m3)
8.2 134
Supplemental Roof 9
(3,5874,9 7,643 951 2.0% 173,000 3,962 178
Insulation (2,521 kWh)
02 m3)
8.3 148
Supplemental Wall 10
(3,988 8,498 938 2.2% 115,000 4,405 118
Insulation (2,803 kWh)
m3)

Pinchin’s proposed energy conservation measures aim to reduce the building’s EUI by approximately
66%, achieving the an EUI of 0.43 GJ/m2/yr. The annual energy cost and maintenance savings
associated with achieving the Post-Retrofit EUI is approximately $46,900.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page iii


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
Facility Overview................................................................................................................... 1
Building Operations .............................................................................................................. 2
1.2.1 Recent Building Upgrades and Contemplated Energy Conservation Measures ......... 2
1.2.2 Typical Energy Consumption Breakdown .................................................................... 3
Mechanical Equipment ......................................................................................................... 3
Pumps and Motors................................................................................................................ 7
Water Conservation .............................................................................................................. 8
Lighting ................................................................................................................................. 9
Building Envelope ............................................................................................................... 10
2.0 UTILITY INFORMATION................................................................................................................ 12
Annual Utility Cost Breakdown ........................................................................................... 12
Energy Consumption .......................................................................................................... 13
2.2.1 Energy Consumption Summary ................................................................................. 13
2.2.2 Energy Consumption Analysis ................................................................................... 15
Water Consumption ............................................................................................................ 18
2.3.1 Water Consumption Summary ................................................................................... 18
2.3.2 Seasonal Water Consumption Analysis ..................................................................... 19
3.0 ENERGY CONSUMPTION BENCHMARKING ............................................................................. 21
Introduction to Energy Use Intensity .................................................................................. 21
Energy Use Intensity Analysis ............................................................................................ 21
Actual Energy Use Breakdown ........................................................................................... 22
4.0 MECHANICAL RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................... 23
Programmable Thermostats Installation ............................................................................. 25
Install a Digital BAS (Building Automation System) ........................................................... 26
RTU – High Efficiency Replacement .................................................................................. 27
MUA - High Efficiency Replacement .................................................................................. 28
Boiler - Replacement .......................................................................................................... 29
IR Tube Heater – Two Stage Replacement ....................................................................... 30
Unit Heater Replacement ................................................................................................... 30
Drain Heat Recovery Retrofit.............................................................................................. 31
DHW Heater Replacement ................................................................................................. 31
Ice Plant Heat Recovery ..................................................................................................... 32
Installation of Sub-meters on the major HVAC equipment. ................................................ 32
5.0 PUMPS AND MOTORS RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................... 32
Installation of Variable Flow Drive (VFDs) on Pumps and Variable Speed Drives (VSDs)
Fan Motors 34
5.1.1 Brine Pump ................................................................................................................. 34
5.1.2 Remaining pumps and motors ................................................................................... 34
Brine Temperature Set Backs ............................................................................................ 35
Ice Resurfacer Replacement .............................................................................................. 35
Demand Control Ventilation................................................................................................ 35
6.0 WATER CONSERVATION ............................................................................................................ 36
Domestic Systems .............................................................................................................. 36
6.1.1 High Efficiency Toilets ................................................................................................ 36
6.1.2 High Efficiency Urinals................................................................................................ 36

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page iv


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

6.1.3 High Efficiency Bathroom Faucets ............................................................................. 37


6.1.4 High Efficiency Kitchen Faucets ................................................................................. 37
6.1.5 High Efficiency Shower Heads ................................................................................... 37
Install a meter on the main water line and sub-meters at the irrigation and Domestic Hot
Water. 38
Maintenance on Water Fixtures and Mechanical Equipment ............................................. 38
Ice Resurfacer .................................................................................................................... 39
7.0 LIGHTING RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................ 39
Light Fixture Retrofit ........................................................................................................... 39
Motion Controlled Light Switch Installation ......................................................................... 44
8.0 BUILDING ENVELOPE RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 44
Window Retrofit .................................................................................................................. 44
Supplemental Roof Insulation............................................................................................. 46
Supplemental Wall Insulation ............................................................................................. 47
Continued Inspections ........................................................................................................ 48
9.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 49
10.0 DISCARDED CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................ 50
11.0 NON-FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS.......................................................................................... 50
12.0 RECOMMENDED ITEMS FOR ASHRAE LEVEL III (CAPITAL GRADE) ENERGY AUDIT......... 50
13.0 TERMS AND LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................... 51

APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Utility Bill Data


APPENDIX II Photographs
APPENDIX III HVAC Equipment List
APPENDIX IV Ranking of Measures

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page v


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1: Building Characteristics ............................................................................................... 2


Table 1-2 Mechanical Energy Conservation Recommendations at Erin Community Centre ........ 7
Table 1-3 Pumps and Motors Energy Conservation Recommendations at Erin Community
Centre ........................................................................................................................................... 8
Table 1-4: Domestic Water Systems Inventory for Erin Community Centre ................................. 8
Table 1-5: Domestic Water Systems Inventory for Erin Community Centre Continued ................ 8
Table 1-6 Water Conservation Recommendations at Erin Community Centre ............................. 9
Table 1-7 Lighting Recommendations at Erin Community Centre .............................................. 10
Table 1-8 Building Envelope Recommendations at Erin Community Centre .............................. 11
Table 3-1 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Erin Community Centre .......................................... 23
Table 4-1 Major Mechanical Equipment in Use at Erin Community Centre ................................ 24
Table 4-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with the installation of programmable at
Erin Community Centre ............................................................................................................... 26
Table 4-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with pneumatic to DDC conversion at the
Erin Community Centre ............................................................................................................... 26
Table 4-4 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Erin
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 28
Table 4-5 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Erin
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 29
Table 4-6 Summary of costs and savings associated with Unit Heater Replacement at the Erin
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 29
Table 4-7 Summary of costs and savings associated with IR tube heater replacement at the Erin
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 30
Table 4-8 Summary of costs and savings associated with Unit Heater Replacement at the Erin
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 30
Table 4-9 Summary of costs and savings associated with Drain Heat Recovery retrofit at the
Erin Community Centre ............................................................................................................... 31
Table 4-10 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Erin
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 31
Table 4-11 Summary of costs and savings associated with ice plant heat recovery at the Erin
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 32
Table 5-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with Brine Pump VFD Installation at the
Erin Community Centre ............................................................................................................... 34
Table 5-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with Brine Temperature Setbacks at the
Erin Community Centre ............................................................................................................... 35
Table 5-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Erin
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 35

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page vi


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 6-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with plumbing fixture retrofit at the Erin
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 38
Table 7-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with lighting retrofit at Erin Community
Centre ......................................................................................................................................... 40
Table 7-2 Summary of Existing and Proposed Lighting Fixtures on Site .................................... 41
Table 8-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with full DG window replacement at Erin
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 46
Table 8-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with full triple glazing window replacement
at Erin Community Centre ........................................................................................................... 46
Table 8-3: Summary of Costs and Savings associated with Supplemental Attic Insulation at Erin
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 47
Table 8-4 Summary of costs and savings associated with supplemental wall insulation at Erin
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 48

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Typical Energy Breakdown in an Ice Rink ................................................................... 3


Figure 1-3 Estimated Breakdown of Annual Lighting Energy Consumption ............................... 10
Figure 2-1 Breakdown of Average Annual Utility Costs .............................................................. 13
Figure 2-2: Annual Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Erin Community Centre .. 14
Figure 2-3: Monthly Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Erin Community Centre . 14
Figure 2-4 Electricity and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis ......................................... 16
Figure 2-5: Electricity and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis ........................................ 16
Figure 2-6: Natural Gas and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis .................................... 17
Figure 2-7: Natural Gas and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis..................................... 17
Figure 2-8: Electricity Consumption and Cooling Degree Days .................................................. 18
Figure 2-9: Summary of Annual Water Data from 2017 to 2018 of Erin Community Centre ...... 18
Figure 2-10: Monthly Water Consumption (m3) of Erin Community Centre ................................ 19
Figure 2-11: Water consumption comparison of Erin Community Centre plotted against heating
and cooling degree-days between 2017 and 2018 ..................................................................... 20
Figure 2-12: Water Consumption and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis ...................... 21
Figure 3-1 EUI Comparison between Erin Community Centre and ASHRAE EUI Target .......... 22
Figure 3-2 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Erin Community Centre ......................................... 23
Figure 7-1 Energy consumption comparison of existing and proposed lighting. ......................... 40
Figure 8-1 Energy consumption comparison of existing DG windows and proposed DG and
Triple glazing window replacement ............................................................................................. 45

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page vii


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Pinchin Ltd. (Pinchin) was retained by Ursula D’Angelo, Director of Finance at Torn of Erin to conduct an
ASHRAE Level II Energy Audit of Erin Community Centre located at 14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario.

The purpose of the energy audit to is identify how energy is used on site and how to maximize available
funds across the best energy conservation measures. To achieve the greatest energy reduction, the
Client would like to implement a series of energy conservation measures (ECMs).

The audit was conducted by Pinchin assessors, Carleen Lawson and Raven Cote, on July 8th at which
time Pinchin interviewed and was accompanied by the Building Manager, hereinafter refer to as the “Site
Representative”.

Cost estimates provided in this report are preliminary Class “D” and provided only as an indication of the
order of magnitude of the remedial work. These values have been arrived at by determining a
representative quantity from the visual observations made at the time of our Site visit and by applying
current market value unit costs to such quantities and or a reasonable lump sum allowance for the work.
More precise cost estimates would require more detailed investigation to define the scope of work. They
are not intended to warrant that the final costs will not exceed these amounts or that all costs are
covered. The estimates assume the work is performed at one time and do not include costs for potential
de-mobilization and re-mobilization if repairs/replacement are spread out over the term of analysis.

All costs are identified in 2019 Canadian Dollars, including a 20% contingency fee to cover unforeseen
costs. Repair/replacement cost estimates are accurate to +/- 50%.

All cost estimates assume that regular annual maintenance and repairs will be performed to all building
elements at the facility. No cost allowance is carried for this regular maintenance.

The cost estimates provided in this report are based on costs of past repairs at similar buildings, recent
costing data such as “RS Means” and “Hanscomb’s Yardsticks for Costing”, or Pinchin’s professional
judgment.

Energy Savings and Demand Savings provided in this report are estimated to an accuracy of +/- 30%

This report satisfies all requirements an ASHRAE level II energy Audit as stated by the
ANSI/ASHRAE/ACCA Standard 211-2018 and ASHRAE Standard 100-2015 -- Energy Efficiency in
Existing Buildings.

Facility Overview

Table 1-1 provides a summary of the building use and construction.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 1-1: Building Characteristics

Building Age 42 years (Construction circa 1977);


Ownership Status Owned by Town of Erin

Utility Data Electricity – Hydro One, Gas – Enbridge, Water – Town of Erin
Gross Floor Area 5,574 m2 (60,000 ft2)
Building Type Recreation (Ice Arena)
Occupied Hours September - April: 105 hours/week; May – August: 45 hours/week
Regular Occupancy ~6.5 fulltime equivalent staff, ~413 average daily visitors (varies seasonally)
Roof System Built-up roof, inverted roof, modified bitumen, and sloped metal
Wall System Brick masonry, split-ribbed architectural block, and metal cladding
Windows Insulated glazed or single glazed, aluminum framed windows;
(Window-to-Wall-Ratio: 0.11)

Building Operations

A solid understanding of building operations and occupancy allows building owners to assess the varying
power and ventilation loads and improve the efficiency of energy using systems. The Site Building is
comprised of 5,574 m2 of recreation space. The building operates as the Community Centre with some
leased spaces and shared halls. Site amenity areas include a theatre, food bank, adult and child daycare
centres, and shared space with the adjacent Erin District high school.

The ice rink is open from September to April. Due to the fluctuation in program attendance, the average
number of occupants is difficult to accurately specify. The Site Representative informed Pinchin that there
are 2.5 full-time equivalent staff who primarily work from 7am to 4pm, year-round. Pinchin noted an
additional 4 staff working in the adult and child daycare centres. In addition, the Site Representative
reported that, during the skating season, there are on average 500 visitors on week days and 1000
visitors a day during the weekend. In the summer the building is used occasionally for community events
and summer camps. The Site representative estimated that there is approximately 1 event a week, with
200 visitors on average in the banquet hall. Additionally, the adult day program and child daycare runs
Monday to Friday year-round. The snack bar is assumed to be used 25 hours a week during the skating
season, while the fridges and coolers operate all year.

1.2.1 Recent Building Upgrades and Contemplated Energy Conservation Measures

This section details the recent upgrades and changes to the building as well as any ECMs contemplated
by the building mangers.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

• In 2009, the original metal halide lamps above the ice rink were converted to fluorescent T5 and
T8 lamps.

• The Site staff are contemplating the installation of an ice plant heat recovery system.

• The Site staff reported an ongoing leak affecting the Minor League Hockey office and elevator.
The leak is reportedly penetrating through the roof, which will be replaced in one year.

• The Site staff reported that they experience drafts at the windows and doors. A window
replacement is anticipated in the future.

1.2.2 Typical Energy Consumption Breakdown

A study of the energy consumption breakdown within similar buildings is a key first step in determining
opportunities for energy reduction (refer to Figure 1-1). Pinchin has provided a breakdown of a typical ice
rink energy use. Energy in an ice rink is dominantly used by the space heating, ice plant, domestic hot
water (DHW) and lighting systems. Recommended retrofits will be focused on these areas to best
improve the Site’s overall energy efficiency and lower utility costs.

Figure 1-1 Typical Energy Breakdown in an Ice Rink

Plug load Ventilation


3% 2%

Domestic Hot Water Lighting


5% 9%

Ice Plant
20% Heating
61%

Mechanical Equipment

The primary HVAC equipment in use at Erin Community Centre is described in the follow section. A full
list of the HVAC equipment is provided in Appendix III.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 3 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Heating, cooling, and ventilation of the Site Building are provided by eight (8) gas-fired roof top units
(RTUs), one (1) air-conditioning unit, one (1) gas-fired make up air unit (MUA), one (1) gas-fired unit
heater (UH), one (1) infrared radiant (IR) tube heater with associated supply and exhaust fans and one
(1) boiler with associated hydronic radiators located in the original building. Additional heating is supplied
by electric force flow and baseboard heaters. Additional ventilation is provided by the kitchen make up air
units, up flow exhaust fans, hood fan and washroom exhaust fans.

Four (4) natural gas packaged rooftop air handling units are located on the roof above the first floor, and
provide heating, cooling, and ventilation for the adult day center, theatre, lobby and office areas. The units
have Based on nameplate information, the “York” units have input capacities of 180,000 BTUH and
240,000 BTUH and were manufactured between 2014 and 2017.

One (1) natural gas packaged roof top air handling unit (HVAC - 14), which provides heating, cooling, and
ventilation for the Upper Cafeteria area, is located on the roof of the Site Building above the 2nd floor
area. The unit has a medium-efficiency. Based on the nameplate information, the “Carrier” unit was
manufactured in 1999 (~ 20 years old) and has an input capacity of 150,000 BTUH. Refrigerant for this
unit is R-22. This unit appears to be running properly and no outstanding deficiencies were noted by the
Site Representative. However, based on its age the rooftop unit has achieved its PUL.

One (1) natural gas packaged roof top air handling unit (HVAC - 1) is located on the roof above the 2nd
floor area, and provides heating, cooling and ventilation for Room 128. The unit has a medium-efficiency.
Nameplate information indicates that it is a “Carrier” unit manufactured in 2000 (~ 18 years old), with an
input capacity of 180,000 BTUH. Refrigerant for this unit is R-22. The unit appears to be running properly
and no outstanding deficiencies were noted by the Site Representative. However, based on its age the
rooftop unit has achieved its PUL.

One (1) natural gas packaged roof top air handling unit is located on the lower roof above the lobby of
Site Building. This unit provides heating, cooling, and ventilation for the theatre and theatre lobby. The
unit has a medium-efficiency. Based on the nameplate information, the “Carrier” unit was manufactured in
1999 (~ 20 years old) and have input capacities of 150,000 BTUH each. Refrigerant for the unit is R-22.
The unit appeared to be running properly and no outstanding deficiencies were noted by the Site
Representative. However, based on its age the rooftop unit has achieved its PUL.

All the above mentioned RTUs have a natural gas heating section, DX cooling section, a supply fan,
economizer and a filter section.

One (1) “Trane” natural gas roof top unit is located on the roof of the 2000 addition, and supplies heat to
the new change rooms, food bank and the skate sharpening office. The nameplate was not visible. The
mechanical drawings indicate that the unit was intended to have an input capacity of 58.6 kW.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 4 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

One (1) 2.5 ton “Trane” air conditioning unit is located on the roof of the 2000 addition, and supplies
cooling to the new change rooms, food bank and the skate sharpening office.

The one (1) “ENGINEERED AIR” natural gas indirect fired MUA serves the theatre located on the high
roof of the building. The nameplate was missing at the time of the inspection. The unit appeared to be
approximately 20 years old. An additional “ENGINEERED AIR” natural gas indirect fired MUA serves the
daycare centre and two classrooms. The Site Representative informed Pinchin that this MUA is not the
responsibility of the Town of Erin. Based on the nameplate information, the “Engineered Air” unit was
manufactured in 2000 (~ 18 years old). The unit appeared to be running properly and no outstanding
deficiencies were noted by the Site Representative. However, based on its age the rooftop unit has
achieved its PUL.

The two (2) “Spring Air” MUA units are associated with the two kitchens. The exact age of the units is
unknown; however, they appear to be more than 20 years old. Pinchin recommends to replace the units
and update the system as per Code requirements.

As previously mentioned, some of the units are using refrigerant R-22, which is part of a group of
refrigerants that are due to be phased out as part of the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete
the Ozone Layer. Production of R-22 refrigerant in use at this facility is on track for a 99.5% phase out by
2020, and a 100% phase out by 2030. This means R-22 refrigerant is becoming more difficult to find,
more expensive to purchase, and equipment which operates on R-22 will become more difficult to repair
or replace as manufacturers move to equipment using newer refrigerants. Also, the replacement could be
completed in a phased and planned approach.

Rooftop heating/cooling units typically have a PUL of 20 to 25 years but can often operate well past their
PUL with regular maintenance and service work as required. It is recommended to replace the existing
RTUs and MUA units at the end of their PUL with the highest efficiency units available (Heating: 91%;
Cooling: 18 SEER) to reduce energy consumption.

It is recommended to replace the gas fired is located with a modulating condensing boiler at the end of its
PUL. Natural gas-fired steam boilers typically have a PUL of 25 to 30 years. The conversion to a
modulating condensing boiler would improve efficiency of building operations, improve occupant comfort
and reduce energy consumption and utility costs. This recommendation is discussed further in Section 4
of the report.

The unit heater and IR tube heater are controlled via standalone thermostats while the RTUs and MUAs
are controlled using a programmable wall mounted thermostat located in each zone. Programmable
thermostats increase the ease for ECMs, such as temperature setbacks, to be implemented within the
facility.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 5 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

The Site Representative reported that there is a specified set point during the winter operating hours, but
not in the summer. A prescribed thermostat program would reduce energy consumption and utility costs.
This suggested upgrade is discussed further in Section 4 of the report.

There is currently no building automation system (BAS) in place at Erin Community Centre. The
conversion to a BAS system would improve efficiency of building operations, improve occupant comfort
and reduce energy consumption and utility costs. This recommendation is discussed further in Section 4
of the report.

Domestic hot water production and storage within the facility is a year-round operation and is primarily
consumed by the domestic water fixtures and the ice resurfacer. Domestic hot water (DHW) production is
accomplished with two (2) 400,000 Btuh “Lochinvar” DHW heaters (manufactured in 2010), one (1)
80,000 Btuh “AO Smith” DHW heater (manufactured in 1993) and one (1) 75,1000 Btuh “Lochinvar” DHW
heaters (manufactured in 2016).

The recommended upgrades are discussed further in Section 4 of the report.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 6 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 1-2 Mechanical Energy Conservation Recommendations at Erin Community Centre

Equipment Type Issue Recommendation Section

No established
Programmable program for Program seasonal temperature
4.1
Thermostats temperature set point and setbacks.
setbacks in summer.

BAS No BAS system. Upgrade to BAS system. 4.2

Existing units are Replace with high efficiency


RTUs 4.3
mid-efficiency. units

Existing unit is mid- Replace with high efficiency


MUA 4.4
efficiency. units

Existing unit is an Replace with a modulating


Boiler 4.5
atmospheric boiler. condensing boiler.

Existing unit is only Replace with two stage IR Tube


IR Tube Heater 4.6
a one stage models Heaters

Existing unit is not a


Replace with a high efficiency
Unit Heaters high efficiency 4.7
condensing model.
condensing model

Heat from DHW is


Recover drain heat waste to
Shower Drains lost through the 4.8
preheat DHW.
shower drains.

Two existing unit are


Replace with a high efficiency
DHW Heater mid-efficiency, tank 4.9
tankless DHW heater.
style units.

Waste heat from ice Recover waster heat to preheat


Ice Plant rink is released fresh supply air and DHW or 4.10
outside. melt snow pit contents.

No submeters are
Meters Install sub meters. 4.11
installed.

Pumps and Motors

The pumps in use at Erin Community Centre include the brine pump, jacket pump, evaporative condenser
pump and spray pump, boiler pump and those that are associated with the fire safety systems. The
motors in use at Erin Community Centre consist of the ice plant compressor motors, supply and exhaust
fan motors, DHW motor and heating unit motors.

The fans may be operated by the user or when the heating and cooling modes are engaged by the
programmable thermostat.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 7 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Ventilation is a key contributor to the Site building’s base load demand, base power demand and annual
average power factor levels. Power factor is important to consider when analysing the impact of inductive
loads on the Site Building’s annual utility costs; Power factor tends to decrease as inductive loads
increase. In addition, power demand must be considered as it is correlated to electrical equipment use.
Improvements to motor efficiency will lead to a reduction in energy consumption. Table 1-3 lists Pinchin’s
pumps and motor energy conservation recommendations at Erin Community Centre.

Table 1-3 Pumps and Motors Energy Conservation Recommendations at Erin Community Centre
Equipment Type Issue Recommendation Section

No brine
Program brine temperature
Brine Pump temperature setback 5.1.1
setbacks for unoccupied hours.
program in place.

Ice Plant Pumps No VFD present. Install VFDs on Pumps. 5.1.2

No capacitator Install capacitator to improve


Compressor Motors 5.2
observed. the power factor of the motor.

Higher efficiency
models are
Ice Resurfacer available, and the Upgrade the Ice Resurfacer to a
5.3
Replacement existing unit is high efficiency model.
approaching the end
of its PUL.

Water Conservation

The water-using systems in use at Erin Community Centre consist of the following: Ice resurfacer, kitchen
faucets, lavatory faucets, toilet, urinals and shower heads. It should be noted that Erin Community Centre
does not possess a water meter.Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference. Table 1-4 and Table 1-5
quantify the domestic water fixtures in place:

Table 1-4: Domestic Water Systems Inventory for Erin Community Centre

Lavatory Shower
Area Toilet LPF Urinal LPF LPM LPM
Faucet Head

Site Building 2 11.3 4 3.8 8 5.7 15 9.5


21 6 1 7.6
3 8.3
Table 1-5: Domestic Water Systems Inventory for Erin Community Centre Continued

Area Kitchen Faucet LPM Custodial Sink LPM

Site Building 12 8.3 5 8.3

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 8 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Conventional and high efficiency (HE) faucets, toilets and urinals are found throughout the Site building.
Pinchin recommends the conventional and HE fixtures should be replaced with ultra-low flow alternatives.
These recommendations are discussed in further detail in Section 6.0 of the report.

Water conserving measures are expected to reduce water costs and wear and tear within water
consuming systems. Table 1-6 lists Pinchin’s water conservation recommendations at Erin Community
Centre.

Table 1-6 Water Conservation Recommendations at Erin Community Centre

Equipment
Issue Recommendation Section
Type

The inefficient fixtures and


Conventional fixtures were
Domestic faucets should be replaced with 6.1
found.
ultra-low flow alternatives.

Install a main water meter and


There are no submeters
Meters sub-meters and monitor water 6.2
installed.
consumption.

Continue conducting routine


Continued Insufficient maintenance can
inspections and ongoing 6.3
Maintenance lead to unidentified issues.
maintenance.

Install a gauge to ensure only the


Ice resurfacer may be being over
Ice Resurfacer necessary amount of hot water is 6.4
supplied with hot water
loaded into the ice resurfacer.

Lighting

The lighting systems within Erin Community Centre consists of T5 linear fluorescent lamps and T8 linear
fluorescent lamps with HPS wall packs, fluorescent pot lights and metal halide light standards located at
the exterior. The majority of the lighting system is controlled manually. A number of washroom fixtures
have been placed on motion sensors which deactivate the light if there is no activity near them.

The fluorescent, metal halide and HPS fixtures currently in use are inefficient and it is recommended that
they are replaced with LED alternatives. A lighting upgrade would reduce energy consumption and utility
costs. These upgrades are discussed further in Section 7 of the report. Refer to Figure 1-3 and Table 1-7.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 9 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 1-2 Estimated Breakdown of Annual Lighting Energy Consumption

Lighting
4%

Other
96%

Table 1-7 Lighting Recommendations at Erin Community Centre

Lighting
Issue Recommendation Section
Type

Metal Halide, Metal Halide, fluorescent


Fluorescent and HPS lighting fixtures are LED lighting retrofit. 7.1
significantly less efficient
and HPS than LEDs.

Install occupancy sensors to


Controls The majority of lighting on 7.2
site is switch controlled. control the lighting.

Building Envelope

This building envelope was reviewed including the windows, exterior cladding and all entrances and exits.
These building systems are subject to air and heat leakage as well as moisture infiltration. Pinchin
recommends ongoing maintenance to ensure the building envelope is in good condition.

The exterior wall system consists of brick masonry at the East portion of the Site Building while the West
portion of Arena consists of split-ribbed architectural block masonry with areas of metal cladding. Overall,
the wall systems were noted to be in generally good to fair condition. There were areas of the metal
cladding noted to have impact damage. Pinchin recommends periodic repairs to the wall systems be
completed to maintain the integrity of the building envelope and prevent air leaks.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Window assemblies are mostly from construction of the original building (1977), and of the additions
(1992, 2000, and 2010). The punched window systems of the Site Building generally consist of fixed or
operable insulated glazed (IG) units, or operable (i.e., horizontally sliding) single glazed (SG) units within
aluminum frames, complete with insect screens. There is also an aluminum framed curtainwall system
installed on the North elevation stairwell. As observed from ground level and accessible rooms within the
interior of the building, the windows appeared to be in generally fair condition. As the Site representative
reported that the existing windows are drafty, Pinchin recommends that as they approach their Projected
Useful Life (PUL), they be replaced with modern IGU systems to offer improved thermal performance.

The main and secondary entrance doors of the Site Building consist of IG unit prefinished aluminum
doors within prefinished aluminum frames. Secondary exit doors consist of hollow metal doors within
metal frames. In addition, there are two (2) overhead garage doors on the North and West elevation. The
doors are in good to fair condition, with areas of corrosion at the metal frames and poor weather-stripping.
Pinchin recommends repairs to the corroded frames and weather-stripping to ensure the heat transfer
and air leakage are minimized at points of entry.

The roof has several sections; a built-up roof (BUR) system atop the community centre; an inverted roof
system atop the Northwest portion; a modified bitumen roof system atop the entrance canopy; and a
sloped metal roof system atop the arena. The roof systems are reportedly original to the original building
(1977), and the additions (1992, 2000, and 2010). The metal roof was reportedly coated/overlain with a
membrane 15 years ago (circa 2003). The Site staff reported that the inverted roof is leaking at the
Northwest maintenance shop on the West elevation. The BUR system was found to in poor condition with
wind scouring, ponding water, debris and localized vegetation growth observed, as well as an active leak
reported at the Southwest corner.

Moisture degrades the performance of the insulation resulting in a lower R value. Pinchin recommends
repair of the leaks at the affected roofs and upon replacement of the roof systems, that supplemental
insulation be provided to improve the overall thermal performance. Regular maintenance and condition
reviews are recommended.

Refer to Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference. for Building Envelope Recommendations.

Table 1-8 Building Envelope Recommendations at Erin Community Centre

Area Issue Recommendation Section

Windows Some windows are approaching the Replace the older windows with new
8.1
end of their PUL assemblies.

Roof The Roof is assumed to have the


minimum required levels of Supplement roof Insulation 8.1
insulation.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 11 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Walls The walls appear to contain minimal


insulation, resulting in unwanted Supplement wall insulation 8.2
heat transfer.

Continue conducting routine


Insufficient maintenance can lead to
Facility inspections and ongoing 8.3
unidentified issues.
maintenance.

2.0 UTILITY INFORMATION

The Erin Community Centre makes use of electricity, natural gas, propane and water. Monthly electricity
data consumption data was provided for November 2016 to December 2018; electricity cost data was
missing for July 2018, November 2018 and December 2018. The following assumptions were made for
missing months:

• Pinchin assumed the July 2018 cost by multiplying the July 2017 cost according to the ratio
of July 2018 and July 2017 electricity consumption.

• Pinchin assumed the November 2018 cost by multiplying the November 2017 cost according
to the ratio of November 2018 and November 2017 electricity consumption.

• Pinchin assumed the December 2018 cost by multiplying the December 2017 cost according
to the ratio of December 2018 and December 2017 electricity consumption.

Natural gas data was provided for the period of December 2016 to May 2019. Propane gas data was
provided for the period of November 2016 to April 2019. Water consumption data was provided for the
period of December 2016 to May 2019.

The date range for the various utilities do not align with each other. For an energy audit it is important to
be able to compare utility data for the same months; therefor, Pinchin will only analyze data from January
2017 to December 2018.

The utility consumption tables have been provided in Appendix I of the report.

Annual Utility Cost Breakdown

Analyzing annual costs of utilities is essential to prioritizing energy conservation measures. Figure 2-1
shows a breakdown of the average annual utility costs at Erin Community Centre. Electricity consumption
accounts for 67% ($121,249); natural gas accounts for 21% ($39,055); water accounts for 10% ($18,326);
and propane accounts for 2% ($3,054) of the annual utility costs. Electricity consumption is assumed to
be higher than natural gas as it is associated with a greater range of applications such as the ice plant,
lighting and plug loads. The combined average annual cost for all utilities is $181,326. Pinchin has
identified conservation measures for each utility which will be discussed in later sections of the report.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 12 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-1 Breakdown of Average Annual Utility Costs


Water, $18,326 ,
10% Natural Gas,
$39,055 , 21%
Propane, $3,054
, 2%

Electricity,
$121,249 , 67%

Energy Consumption

2.2.1 Energy Consumption Summary

On-site energy is provided by electricity and natural gas for the Site Building and propane gas for the ice
resurfacer.

Figure 2-2 provides a summary of annual electricity, natural gas, propane gas and total energy
consumption for the period from 2017 to 2018 for Erin Community Centre.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 13 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-2: Annual Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Erin Community Centre

Average
Year

2018

2017

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000


Energy Consumption (GJ)
Total Natural Gas Electricity Propane

Figure 2-3 shows the monthly electricity, natural gas and propane consumption, converted to gigajoules
to allow for comparability, from January 2017 to December 2018. Natural gas is evidently the primary
heat source for the site, which can be seen by the annual peak in consumption from December to May.

Figure 2-3: Monthly Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Erin Community Centre

1,400

1,200
Energy Consumption (GJ)

1,000

800

600

400

200

0
Nov-17

Nov-18
Apr-17
May-17

Jul-17

Apr-18
May-18

Jul-18
Aug-17

Oct-17

Aug-18

Oct-18

Dec-18
Feb-17

Sep-17

Dec-17

Feb-18
Jan-17

Mar-17

Jun-17

Jan-18

Mar-18

Jun-18

Sep-18

Month
Electricity (GJ) Gas (GJ) Propane (GJ)

Electricity is used on Site for ice plant, ventilation, lighting and plug loads. The average monthly
consumption is 185 GJ. The seasonal averages were compared, with the fall having the highest average
with 279 GJ and spring having the lowest average with 69 GJ. The fall electricity consumption was 4
times higher than the spring consumption. This reflects the operation of the ice plant during the fall, winter
and spring months which significantly increases the electricity consumption.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 14 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Natural gas is used on Site for space heating, domestic hot water heating and cooking. The average
monthly consumption is 401 GJ. The seasonal averages were compared, with the winter having the
highest average with 692 GJ and summer having the lowest average with 39 GJ. The winter natural gas
consumption was approximately 18 times higher than the summer consumption. This is as expected as
space heating and domestic hot water heating is required less during the summer season and the
building occupancy is concentrated between September and April.

Propane gas is used on Site for the ice resurfacer. The average monthly consumption is 6 GJ. The
seasonal averages were compared, with the fall having the highest average with 11 GJ and summer
having the lowest average with 6 GJ. The fall propane gas consumption was approximately 2 times
higher than the summer consumption. This is as expected as ice resurfacer is required less during the
summer season and the building occupancy is concentrated between September and April.

2.2.2 Energy Consumption Analysis

To determine the effects of weather, two regression analyses were performed each for electricity
consumption and natural gas consumption in relation to heating degree days (HDD) and cooling degree
days (CDD). The climate data used was referenced from Historical Climate Data (2019). The first two
analyses looked at the relationship between electricity consumption, heating degree days and cooling
degree days. 1 The correlation between consumption and HDD/CDD is expressed as the displayed value
of R2. Essentially, this represents the amount of energy used per increase in heating/cooling degree day.
The R2 value does not in any way represent how efficiently the system operates. The results in Figure 2-4
and Figure 2-5 show a moderate and weak linear relationship between HDD, CDD and electricity
consumption. The results indicate that the electricity use is mostly directed to base loads in the building,
such as the ice plant.

1
A heating degree day is defined as the number of degrees that a day's average temperature is below 18°. If the average outdoor
temperature is 5°C, the corresponding HDD would be 18°C - 5°C = 13°C.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 15 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-4 Electricity and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis

y = 0.2864x + 86.721
Electricity Consumption Vs HDD
350.0 R² = 0.5663
Electricity Consumption

300.0
250.0
200.0
(GJ)

150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
HDD

Figure 2-5: Electricity and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis

Electricity Consumption Vs CDD


350.0
Electricity Consumption (GJ)

300.0
250.0
200.0 y = -1.9765x + 234.51
150.0 R² = 0.3826

100.0
50.0
0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
CDD

The next two analyses’ looked at the relationship between natural gas consumption, heating degree days
and cooling degree days. The results in Figure 2-6 show a moderate linear relationship between gas
consumption and HDD. The results indicate that the natural gas use is mostly related to the occupancy of
the building.

The results are understandable as natural gas is used to for space heating and domestic hot water
heating and the building is generally only occupied between October and April. The results in Figure 2-7
show a moderate negetive linear relationship between warm outdoor temperatures and natural gas
consumption. This is expected as natural gas use is reduced in the warmer weather.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 16 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-6: Natural Gas and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis

Gas Consumption Vs HDD y = 1.015x + 55.995


1,400.0
R² = 0.631
Gas Consumption (GJ)

1,200.0
1,000.0
800.0
600.0
400.0
200.0
0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
HDD

Figure 2-7: Natural Gas and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis

y = -7.2792x + 564.73
Gas Consumption Vs CDD R² = 0.4499
1,400.0
Gas Consumption (GJ)

1,200.0
1,000.0
800.0
600.0
400.0
200.0
0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
CDD

The regression analysis for electricity and cooling degree days indicates that cooling is not a significant
source of electricity use and is small in comparison to the natural gas heating.

Figure 2-8 shows the relationship between electricity consumption, natural gas consumption, HDDs and
CDDs on a monthly basis. The graph illustrates a rise in electricity consumption accompanying a rise in
HDDs.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 17 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-8: Electricity Consumption and Cooling Degree Days

1400.0 900
800
Energy Consumption (GJ)

1200.0
700
1000.0
600

HDD & CDD


800.0 500
600.0 400
300
400.0
200
200.0 100
0.0 0

Nov-17

Nov-18
Apr-17
May-17

Jul-17

Apr-18
May-18

Jul-18
Aug-17

Oct-17

Aug-18

Oct-18
Feb-17

Dec-17

Feb-18

Jun-18

Sep-18

Dec-18
Jan-17

Mar-17

Jun-17

Sep-17

Jan-18

Mar-18
Months
Gas (GJ) Electricity (GJ) HDD CDD

Water Consumption

2.3.1 Water Consumption Summary

Figure 2-9 provides a summary of annual water data for the period from 2017 to 2018 for Erin Community
Centre, and Figure 2-10 provides a monthly summary for the Site building over the same time period.

Figure 2-9: Summary of Annual Water Data from 2017 to 2018 of Erin Community Centre

2018 4,268
Year

2017 4,966

3,800 4,000 4,200 4,400 4,600 4,800 5,000 5,200


Water (m3)

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 18 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-10: Monthly Water Consumption (m3) of Erin Community Centre

900
800
Water Consumtion (m3)

700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month
2017 2018

Water is used on Site for boilers, domestic hot and cold water systems, refrigeration equipment and the
ice resurfacer. The average monthly consumption is 385 m3. The seasonal averages were compared,
with the winter and spring seasons having the lowest averages, 196 m3 and 260 m3 respectively. The
summer and fall season averages were 442 m3 and 641 m3 respectively. The combined seasonal
average for the winter and spring was approximately two times higher than the summer and fall seasons.

2.3.2 Seasonal Water Consumption Analysis

The water consumption of the Site building, averaged between 2017 and 2018, was determined to be
4,617 m3. Figure 2-11 shows the correlation between water consumption, monthly Heating Degree Days
and monthly Cooling Degree Days measured in degrees Celsius (°C). A rise in consumption was
observed in Fall 2017, otherwise the water usage appears to be steady. Fluctuations of water
consumption could have been attributed to many factors: potential shifts in occupancy of the Site building,
installation of different fixtures, leaks, etc.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 19 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-11: Water consumption comparison of Erin Community Centre plotted against heating
and cooling degree-days between 2017 and 2018

900 900
800 800
Water Consumption (m3)

700 700
600 600

HDD & CDD


500 500
400 400
300 300
200 200
100 100
0 0
Nov-17

Nov-18
Apr-17
May-17

Jul-17

Apr-18
May-18

Jul-18
Aug-17

Oct-17

Aug-18

Oct-18
Feb-17

Dec-17

Feb-18

Sep-18

Dec-18
Jan-17

Mar-17

Jun-17

Sep-17

Jan-18

Mar-18

Jun-18
Months
Water Consumption (m3) HDD CDD

Figure 2-12 is a graphical representation of water consumption in relation to the increase in number of
cooling degree days (CDD), at the Site building. From this graph, no patterns in measured water
consumption can be seen to occur in relation to the measured number of cooling degree days. The
correlation between consumption and CDD is expressed as the displayed value of R2 in Figure 2-12.
Essentially, this represents the amount of water lost per increase in cooling degree day. The R2 value
does not in any way represent how efficiently the system operates. On a scale of 0% to 100%, the
relation between water consumption and CDD can be expressed as 2%, which indicates very poor
correlation. The correlation is expected as the building does not use a cooling tower for space cooling in
the summer and does not have an irrigation system.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 20 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-12: Water Consumption and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis

Water Consumption Vs CDD


900
800
Water Consumption (m3)

y = 0.9414x + 347.83
700 R² = 0.023
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
CDD

3.0 ENERGY CONSUMPTION BENCHMARKING

Introduction to Energy Use Intensity

Energy use intensity (EUI) is a standard metric for energy consumption in buildings. The EUI is calculated
as a buildings annual energy consumption divided by its gross floor area. Normalizing the energy usage
for area allows for comparison between buildings and indicates relative performance.

The EUI is a limited metric as it is not normalized for other building characteristics such as climate zone.
To account for this limitation, the report will refer to ASHRAE Standard 100-2015 Energy target which
factors in building activity type, occupancy and climate zone. The targets “represent the 25th bottom (low
energy) percentile of energy use by each building category” 2. The ASHRAE energy target for Erin
Community Centre was determined to be 0.53 GJ/m2/year. Please refer to Appendix V for the
assumptions and calculations.

Energy Use Intensity Analysis

On average, from 2017 to 2018 Erin Community Centre consumed 2,225 GJ of electricity and 4,811 GJ of
natural gas. It is assumed that the Site uses 73 GJ of propane gas. This amounts to approximately 7,109
GJ of annual energy consumption. The gross floor area is approximately 5,574 m2 (43,163 sf). The
resulting EUI is therefore 1.28 GJ/m2/yr. The calculated EUI is 2.4 times higher than the ASHRAE energy
target of 0.53 GJ/m2/yr.

It is economically feasible to reduce the Site building’s energy consumption by improving the efficiency of
the building systems. Pinchin’s proposed energy conservation measures aim to reduce the building’s EUI

2
ASHRAE Standard 100-2015

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 21 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

by approximately 66%, achieving the an EUI of 0.43 GJ/m2/yr. The annual energy cost and maintenance
savings associated with achieving the Post-Retrofit EUI is approximately $46,753.

Figure 3-1 EUI Comparison between Erin Community Centre and ASHRAE EUI Target

1.40

1.20 1.28
Energy Usage Intensity (GJ/m2/year)

1.00

0.80

0.60

0.53
0.40
0.43

0.20

-
Site Building (Current EUI) ASHRAE Target EUI Site Building (Post
Retrofits)

Pinchin recommends installing submeters at major energy systems so a further cost analysis can be
performed, and more savings identified.

Actual Energy Use Breakdown

Pinchin generated an energy use breakdown for Erin Community Centre with information collected on site
as well as previous building reports, building drawings, equipment specifications and utility bill data
provided by the client. In the case of missing information, Pinchin made assumptions based on ice rink
energy consumption patterns. As seen in Figure 3-2, space heating accounts for 60% of energy
consumed within the facility and the ice rink accounts for 18%. Energy conservation measures are
therefore concentrated primarily on heating load reduction and refrigeration load reductions.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 22 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 3-2 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Erin Community Centre

Ice Plant, 779, 11.0%


Elevator, 20, 0.3%
Kitchen, 300, 4.2%

Plug Load, 215, 3.0%

Lighting, 306, 4.3%

Heating, 3866, 54.4%

DHW, 1091, 15.3%

Ventilation, 183, 2.6%


Cooling, 350, 4.9%

Table 3-1 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Erin Community Centre

System Assumed Energy Consumption (GJ) Percentage

Heating 3858 54%

Cooling 366 5%

Ventilation 178 2%

DHW 1091 15%

Lighting 303 4%

Plug Load 215 3%

Kitchen 300 4%

Elevator 20 0.3%

Ice Plant 779 11%

4.0 MECHANICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

The major HVAC equipment installed at Erin Community Centre is listed in. A description of the existing
HVAC system along with a detailed equipment list can be found in Appendix III of the report.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 23 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 4-1 Major Mechanical Equipment in Use at Erin Community Centre

Heating Cooling Remaining


Make Model # Function Condition PUL
Input Output Lifespan
Space
Slant Fin 300,000 Fair to
GG300HXPE Heating -
"Galazy" Btuh Good
Boiler 25 1
Space
Heating -
Bradford White RTV-119-L 575 W Fair
Indirect
Water Heater 20 8
Space
1,000,000 17.2
ENG A Unknown Conditioning Poor
Btuh* kW*
- MUA 30 10
Space
Carrier 150,000
48HJF006---131-- 5 Ton Conditioning Poor
"Weathermaster" Btuh
- RTU 25 5
Space
Carrier 150,000 Fair to
48HJF006---131-- 7.5 Ton Conditioning
"Weathermaster" Btuh Poor
- RTU 25 5
Space
Carrier 180,000 Fair to
48HJE008---131-- 5 Ton Conditioning
"Weathermaster" Btuh Poor
- RTU 25 5
Space
180,000 Fair to
York ZF090N15N5AAA5A 7.5 Ton Conditioning
Btuh Good
- RTU 25 20
Space
240,000 12.5 Fair to
York ZH150N24D5B1BAA1A1 Conditioning
Btuh Ton Good
- RTU 25 23
Space
240,000 12.5 Fair to
York ZH150N24D5B1BAA1A2 Conditioning
Btuh Ton Good
- RTU 25 23
Space
180,000 Fair to
York ZF090N15N5AAA5A 7.5 Ton Conditioning
Btuh Poor
- RTU 25 20
Space
Trane 4YCC3030A1075AA 2.5 Ton Conditioning Fair
- RTU 25 11
Space
Trane Unknown 58.6 kW* Conditioning Fair
- RTU 25 6*
40,000 Space Fair to
Unknown Unknown
Btuh* Heating - UH Poor 20 6
Space
Stelpro WF3008T 3000 W Heating - Fair
FFH 15 6

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 24 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Space
Stelpro WF3008T 3000 W Heating - Fair
FFH 15 6
Space
Stelpro Unknown 2000 W* Heating - Fair
FFH 15 6
Space
Unknown Unknown 1000 W* Heating - Fair
FFH 15 6
Space
Unknown Unknown 1750 W Fair
Heating - BH 15 6
Space
Unknown Unknown 1000 W* Fair
Heating - BH 15 6
Space
50,000
Re-verber-ray Unknown Heating - IR Poor
Btuh*
Tube 20 3
Spring Air SFA 10 0V 2 HP Ventilation Poor 30 1
Spring Air SFA 10 0V 1 HP Ventilation Poor 30 1
John Wood
250,000 Poor - Not
"Signature JWSC80-250N DWH
Btuh in Use
Series" 12 0
400,000
Lochinvar SNA400-125 DWH Poor
Btuh 12 10
400,000
Lochinvar SNA400-125 DWH Good
Btuh 12 10
80,000 Fair to 12 0
AO Smith BT 100 Y00N000000 DWH
Btuh Poor
75,100 Fair to 12 9
AO Smith BT 100 300 DWH
Btuh Good
Refrigeration 25 2
Unknown Unknown 60 HP* Fair
- Chiller
Refrigeration- 18 5
1174
BAC JC1-80 Evaporative Fair
MBH
Condenser

Programmable Thermostats Installation

The current heating system uses manually controlled thermostats for the unit heater, IR tube heaters
base board heaters and force flow heaters and programmable thermostats for the RTUs, MUAs and
hydronic radiators. Pinchin was informed that the winter set point is approximately 20.6°C (69°F) and the
setback is approximately 17.8°C (64°F). At the time of our Site visit, the cooling set point was 22°C
(71.6°F). There was no scheduled program in place for the cooling setback temperature.

Replacing the standalone thermostats with programmable thermostats will allow for automatic occupied
and unoccupied scheduling, optimal occupied set points and optimal unoccupied setback temperatures.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 25 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

In the summer, it is recommended to set the thermostat to 25.6°C (78°F) during operating hours and
29.4°C (85°F) degrees after hours. Each degree Fahrenheit raised in the summer or lowered in the winter
represents up to 3% of energy savings. Based on our observations, Pinchin assumed that the Site
Building can increase its set point during summer by 4.6°C (6.4°F) and its set back by 7.4°C (13.4°F)
thereby leading to a 34% reduction in cooling costs.

Table 4-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with the installation of programmable at Erin
Community Centre

Annual
Demand Annual System Incentives Simple
Energy
Implement Reduction Savings Cost Available Payback
Savings
(GJ) ($) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.016 143.8 1,564 9,000 3,649 3

IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or


Incentive Details
$0.10/kWh of Annual Savings

*Note: The above assumptions are contingent on revised occupant behaviour as the occupant control the
thermostats. Assumes the cost of 18 new programmable thermostats.

Install a Digital BAS (Building Automation System)

As previously mentioned, ventilation, cooling and space heating within the facility area provided controlled
via a combination of digital and pneumatic thermostats.

The installation of a BAS will allow the Building manager to optimize the efficiency and accuracy of all wall
mounted thermostats, exhaust fans and the ice plant. It would be possible to achieve the desired space
conditions faster than before and reduce the amount of space heating, cooling and refrigeration required.
This measure is expected to provide energy savings and comfort benefits Table 4-3 outlines the
estimated savings associated with the pneumatic to digital BAS conversion at the Erin Community
Centre. This measure will reduce the HVAC energy consumption by about 15%.

See recommendation 5.2 for ice plant related savings.

Table 4-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with pneumatic to DDC conversion at the Erin
Community Centre

Demand Annual Energy Annual Incentives Simple


Savings System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Cost ($)
(GJ) (GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.067 586 4,530 274,000 14,868 57

IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh of


Incentive Details
Annual Savings

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 26 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

A digital BAS will provide long term benefits:

• More information for intelligent building management;

• Lower energy costs through better operating efficiency; and

• Lower maintenance cost through less need for calibration and service of the equipment.

The new BAS shall comprise, at minimum, the following components:

• Distributed Control Panels (DCP);

• Unitary Controllers (UC);

• Automation level Local Area Networks (LAN);

• Field instrumentation including intelligent sensors;

• Automatic Digital Control Valves;

• Actuators for automatic valves and motorised dampers (DDC Control);

• Software;

• Cable and containment; and

• All power supplies and conditioners, interlocking and control relays, equipment enclosures
and other components, materials and services required for a completed and fully operational
turnkey BAS installation meeting these specifications.

The BAS shall meet the following general criteria:

• Fully networked;

• Real time;

• Distributed processing; and

• No single point of failure.

The new BAS shall be configured to ensure reliability of systems operation and control of critical
functions/systems. Each contractor must verify on their own that the BAS is compatible with the
equipment to be controlled.

RTU – High Efficiency Replacement

The existing rooftop units have a thermal efficiency of 80-82% and a cooling Energy Efficiency Ratio
(EER) between 10.1 and 13. The units are considered mid-efficiency and there are much more efficient
units available today. Pinchin recommend replacing the existing RTUs with a 91% efficient unit that has
an EER of 18 to reduce energy consumption. This improvement in efficiency means that the replacement

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 27 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

unit can have a smaller capacity, further reducing energy use and equipment costs. Furthermore,
improved comfort is anticipated through better air quality and a higher turn around time. Refer to
Table 4-4.

Table 4-4 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Erin
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

At end of PUL 0.39 365 4,982 120,000 10,134 22

IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh


Incentive Details
of Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the building’s energy consumption.

MUA - High Efficiency Replacement

The existing “ENG A” MUA was missing its name plate. Based of previous reports and the mechanical
drawings, Pinchin assumed the unit has a thermal capacity of 1,000 MBtu, with an efficiency of 70% and
cooling capacity of 17.2 kW and an EER of 10.1. It is assumed to supply 12000 CFM of air. Due to the
age and condition, Pinchin assumed a 10% loss in efficiency. The unit is considered mid-efficiency and
there are much more efficient units available today.

High-efficiency MUA units use a fuel to heat fresh air, producing flue gases. The flue gases are
condensed which releases the latent heat; the heat exchangers reclaim the waste heat to further
condition the supply air.

Pinchin recommends replacing the existing MUA with a 91% efficient unit, with an 18 EER and a variable
frequency drive. that has an EER of 18 to reduce energy consumption. This improvement in efficiency
mean that the replacement unit can have a smaller capacity, further reducing energy use and equipment
costs. Furthermore, improved comfort is anticipated through better air quality and a higher turn around
time. Refer to Table 4-5 for summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 28 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 4-5 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Erin
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

At end of PUL 0.59 447 2,494 100,000 17,209 33

IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh


Incentive Details of Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs
Enbridge "Equipment Incentive Program": $0.40/CFM per unit with VFD

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the building’s energy consumption.

Boiler - Replacement

The existing gas-fired atmospheric boiler has an 80% efficiency, which is low compared to the high
efficiency models that are now available.

Condensing boilers use fuel to heat water for space heating, producing flue gases. The boiler reduces the
temperature of the exhausted flue gases to below 60°C, causing the gases to condense into a liquid,
releasing latent heat in the process. This heat, typically wasted, is recaptured as used to preheat the cold
return water, saving energy.

This is a good opportunity to install a modulating condensing boiler, which will have an efficiency of up to
98%. Due to the large improvement in efficiency, the heating capacity of the unit can be reduced by
without interrupting the heating output. This measure will reduce the relevant gas consumption by about
21%, improve comfort and reduce chimney repairs and maintenance costs. Refer to Table 4-6.

Table 4-6 Summary of costs and savings associated with Unit Heater Replacement at the Erin
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.07 67 338 30,000 2,874 80

IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh of


Incentive Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs
Details
Enbridge "Equipment Incentive Program": $1,000 per unit ≤ 299 MBtu/hr,

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the building’s energy consumption.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 29 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

IR Tube Heater – Two Stage Replacement

The data plate of the existing IR tube heaters was not visible. Based on mechanical drawings, room size
and unit length, Pinchin assumed it is a one stage, gas-fired unit with an input capacity of 50,000 Btuh.
We recommend installing new two stage IR tube heater which can provide two different heating outputs.
This measure is predicted to reduce the relevant gas consumption by about 12% and will reduce ongoing
maintenance costs. Refer to Table 4-7.

Table 4-7 Summary of costs and savings associated with IR tube heater replacement at the Erin
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

At end of PUL 0.005 7.4 37.4 10,000 0 268

Incentive Details N/A

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the building’s energy consumption.

Unit Heater Replacement

The existing gas-fired unit heater has an 83% efficiency, which is low compared to the high efficiency
models that are now available. This is a good opportunity to install a gas-fired condensing unit heater,
which will have an efficiency of up to 95%. Due to the large improvement in efficiency, the heating
capacity of the units can be reduced by 13% without interrupting the heating output. This measure will
reduce the relevant gas consumption by about 14%. Refer to Table 4-8 for summary of costs and savings
associated with unit heater replacement.

Table 4-8 Summary of costs and savings associated with Unit Heater Replacement at the Erin
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.010 6 32 5,000 0 155

Incentive IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh of
Details Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the building’s energy consumption.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 30 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Drain Heat Recovery Retrofit

There does not appear to be a drain heat recovery system in place at the Site Building. Presently the
DHW heat from showers is lost down the drain. Pinchin recommends installing drain heat recovery units
at each of the shower drains. This system will preheat DHW supply water, requiring less natural gas
energy to heat the water to the desired temperature. Refer to Table 4-9 for costs and savings associated
with drain heat recovery retrofit.

Table 4-9 Summary of costs and savings associated with Drain Heat Recovery retrofit at the Erin
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.38 622 3,119 20,000 10,000 3

IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh


Incentive Details
of Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the building’s energy consumption.

DHW Heater Replacement

The two existing “Lochinvar” DHW heaters have a 98% efficiency while the additional two “AO Smith”
DHW heating have an 80% efficiency on average which is considered standard efficiency. Pinchin
recommends that the units are replaced at the end of their PUL with 98% efficient condensing tankless
water heaters. Storage type DHW heaters are subject to standby heat losses therefore an on-demand
tankless water heater can reduce energy consumption by an additional 14%. This improvement in
efficiency means that the replacement unit can have a smaller capacity, further reducing energy use and
equipment costs. (Refer to Table 4-10).

Table 4-10 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Erin
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

At end of PUL 0.04 66 329 40,000 3,824 110

IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh


Incentive Details of Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs
Enbridge "Equipment Incentive Program": $1,000/unit

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the building’s energy consumption.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 31 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Ice Plant Heat Recovery

There does not appear to be a heat recovery program in place at the Site Building. Due to occupant
activities, lighting and space heating, the ice plant must continuously remove excess heat from the ice
slab in order to keep the ice at the desired temperature. Presently that heat is released outside using the
evaporative condenser, all while the building HVAC systems are generating heat for the interior. It would
reduce the heating load of the HVAC systems if the heat from the ice plant was recovered and used for
space heating, snow melting or DHW heating. The amount of heat an ice rink can potentially recover
generally matches the refrigeration capacity of its ice plant. (Refer to Table 4-11).

Table 4-11 Summary of costs and savings associated with ice plant heat recovery at the Erin
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.317 1,703 11,412 70,000 35,000 3

Incentive IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh of
Details Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the building’s energy consumption.

Installation of Sub-meters on the major HVAC equipment.

Based on information gathered on Site, there are no sub meters installed on the major HVAC equipment.
It is highly recommended that the sub-meters be installed and recorded on a regular basis to track energy
consumption. Sub-metering will not save energy but will help identify energy consumption trends and
quantify opportunities for savings with improved accuracy.

5.0 PUMPS AND MOTORS RECOMMENDATIONS

The major HVAC equipment installed at Erin Community Centre is listed in. A description of the existing
pumps and motors along with a detailed equipment list can be found in Appendix III of the report.

Table 5-1 Pumps and Motors in Use at Erin Community Centre

Remaining
Make Model # Capacity Function Condition PUL
Lifespan
Marathon WK56T34D6662B- 1 HP Jacket Fair 25 Unknown
R10 Pump
Unknown Unknown 20 HP * Brine Pump Poor 25 Unknown
Weg Unknown 30 HP* Compressor Fair 25 5
No.1 Motor

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 32 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Weg CC029A 30 HP Compressor Fair 25 1


No.2 Motor
Weg Unknown 3HP* Evaporative Fair 10 Unknown
Condenser
Pump
Tormont ATC170E1G 7.5 HP Evaporative Fair 20 Unknown
Condenser
Fan
Tormont ATC170E1G 1/2 HP Evaporative Fair 10 Unknown
Condenser
Spray Pump
Bell & Gosset Unknown 1/3 HP Boiler Pump Good 15 7*
Mongomery Kone 8506-66 20 HP Elevator Fair - 35 Unknown
Motor Good
Unknown Unknown 3/4 HP* Exhaust Fan Fair 20 Unknown
- Ice Rink
Unknown Unknown 1/4 HP* Exhaust Fair 20 Unknown
Fans (2) -
Ice Rink
Unknown Unknown 1/4 HP* Exhaust Fan Fair 20 Unknown
(11) -
Washrooms
Unknown Unknown 50 W* Exhaust Fan Fair 20 Unknown
(5) -
Washrooms
Unknown Unknown 350 W* Exhaust Fan Fair 20 9
- Washroom
Unknown Unknown 50 W* Exhaust Fan Fair 20 9
- Washroom
Shop Unknown 50 W* Exhaust Fan Fair 20 9
- Shop
Kitchen Unknown 1 HP Upwards Fair 20 Unknown
Exhaust
Fans (2) -
Kitchen
GreenHeck GB-100-4 1/4 HP Exhaust Fan Fair 20 Unknown
Power Ventilator 709J E38491 1/2 HP Exhaust Fan Fair 20 Unknown
Power Ventilator Unknown 1/2 HP Exhaust Fan Fair 20 Unknown
"FUMEX"
Spring Air SFA 10 0V 2 HP MUA - Poor 30 Unknown
Kitchen
Spring Air SFA 10 0V 1 HP MUA - Poor 30 Unknown
Kitchen
Unknown Unknown 1HP* Range Hood Unknown 20 Unknown
Zamboni 445 Unknown Motor - Ice Good 10 12
Resurfacer

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 33 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Garventa Unknown 5 HP* Elevator Fair - 35 Unknown


Motor Good

Installation of Variable Flow Drive (VFDs) on Pumps and Variable Speed Drives (VSDs) Fan
Motors

5.1.1 Brine Pump

There is presently no VFD on the brine pump. It is assumed to currently operate in full capacity
approximately 12 hours a day. When the Brine pump operates it introduces heat into the brine line,
thereby decreasing the efficiency of the ice plant and increasing the refrigeration load as the plant must
work harder to remove that heat. It is recommended to install a VFD on the Brine pump motor to reduce
the motor’s operating speed and operating capacity in relation to the demand within the facility. This
reduced refrigeration load will also reduce the operating hours of the compressor, a dominant load within
the ice plant.

Table 5-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with Brine Pump VFD Installation at the Erin
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.02 69 2,283 20,000 1,914 8

Incentive IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh of
Details Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

5.1.2 Remaining pumps and motors

Installing a VFD to control the remaining pumps and motors would significantly reduce the amount of
energy consumed by reducing the motor’s operating speed and operating capacity in relation to the
demand within the facility.

The costs and savings have not been included for this measure as they could not be calculated with
confidence. VFDs reduce the operating power of the pumps to meet demand, as a result the components
experience less wear and tear, prolonging their PUL and reducing maintenance costs. This measure is
expected to yield some energy savings; no comfort savings are expected to be obtained.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 34 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Brine Temperature Set Backs

There appears to be only one temperature set point for the Brine. Varying the brine temperature
according to different activities can reduce the compressor run time up to 8%. The Energy Saving Manual
for Ice Arena and Rink Operators Handbook suggest that the Brine be set to -4°C (25°F) for ice
maintenance and the night time, -6°C (22°F) for low load periods, -7°C (20°F) for figure skating and -8°C
(18°F) for Hockey.

Table 5-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with Brine Temperature Setbacks at the Erin
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.011 17 616 N/A 0 Immediate

Incentive IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh of
Details Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

Ice Resurfacer Replacement

The existing ice resurfacer is assumed to be a mid-efficiency model and is approaching the end of its
PUL. Pinchin recommends upgrading the unit to a high efficiency model which can lead to 21% energy
savings. Refer to Table 5-3.

Table 5-4 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Erin
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

At end of PUL 0.02 15 641 100,000 0 155

IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh


Incentive Details
of Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the building’s energy consumption.

Demand Control Ventilation

The existing ventilation system does not appear to have CO2 censors and is assumed to operate at pre-
set ventilation rates, typically based on the maximum occupancy level of the building. As the occupancy

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 35 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

level fluctuates continuously, energy is wasted when the occupancy drops below these pre-determined
rates.

Demand Control Ventilation (DCV) ventilates as well as condition the air during heating or cooling
periods, based on the occupancy level at any specific time. CO2 sensors are used to monitor air quality
and provide real-time feedback to the controls. The controls then adjust the fan speed, modifying the
ventilation rates to suit the number of occupants in the building.

Pinchin recommends connecting the RTU and MUAs to include CO2 sensors. Enbridge currently offers a
$500 incentive for each RTU/MUA with a CO2 sensor. The costs and savings have not been included for
this measure as they could not be calculated with confidence. This measure is expected to yield energy,
thermal comfort and maintenance benefits. Pinchin recommends further investigate using an energy
modelling software program.

6.0 WATER CONSERVATION

Domestic Systems

Based on the information gathered from the domestic water system audit, most toilets, urinals, shower
heads, kitchen faucets and lavatory faucets have conventional flow rates.

The Site buildings can reduce water if they update the remaining toilets, urinals, shower heads, kitchen
faucets and lavatory faucets to ultra low flow options (< 4.8 LPF, <0.5 LPF, < 3.8 LPM, <3.8 LPM and
<1.9 LPM respectively).

6.1.1 High Efficiency Toilets

High efficiency toilets consume 4.8 litres per flush (LPF), while conventional toilets consume 13.25 LPF.
As shown in The water-using systems in use at Erin Community Centre consist of the following: Ice
resurfacer, kitchen faucets, lavatory faucets, toilet, urinals and shower heads. It should be noted that Erin
Community Centre does not possess a water meter.Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference. Table
1-4 and Table 1-5 quantify the domestic water fixtures in place:

Table 1-4, the Site building currently uses upgraded 6 LPF toilets and conventional toilets. Converting the
toilets to 4.8 LPF models would reduce the associated water consumption by approximately 26% or
108,993 litres a year.

6.1.2 High Efficiency Urinals

High efficiency urinals consume 3.8 LPF, while ultra low flow urinals consume 0.5 LPF toilets consume
13.25 LPF. As shown in The water-using systems in use at Erin Community Centre consist of the
following: Ice resurfacer, kitchen faucets, lavatory faucets, toilet, urinals and shower heads. It should be

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 36 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

noted that Erin Community Centre does not possess a water meter.Error! Not a valid bookmark self-
reference. Table 1-4 and Table 1-5 quantify the domestic water fixtures in place:

Table 1-4, the Site building currently uses upgraded 3.8 LPF urinal. Converting the urinals to 3.8 LPF
models would reduce the associated water consumption by approximately 87% or 78,014 litres a year.

6.1.3 High Efficiency Bathroom Faucets

High efficiency bathroom faucets consume 1.9 litres per minute (LPM) of use, significantly lower than that
of conventional 8.3 LPM faucets. As shown in The water-using systems in use at Erin Community Centre
consist of the following: Ice resurfacer, kitchen faucets, lavatory faucets, toilet, urinals and shower heads.
It should be noted that Erin Community Centre does not possess a water meter.Error! Not a valid
bookmark self-reference. Table 1-4 and Table 1-5 quantify the domestic water fixtures in place:

Table 1-4, the Site building currently makes use of upgraded 5.7 LPM faucets and conventional faucets.
Converting all the faucets to higher efficiency 1.9 LPM faucets would reduce the associated water
consumption by approximately 67% or 306,942 litres a year.

6.1.4 High Efficiency Kitchen Faucets

High efficiency kitchen faucets consume 5.7 LPM, ultra-low flow faucets consume 3.8 LPM, while
conventional kitchen faucets consume 8.3 LPM. As shown in Table 1-5, the Site building currently makes
use of conventional 8.3 LPM kitchen faucet fixtures. Converting the conventional kitchen faucets to ultra-
low flow 3.8 LPM faucets would reduce the associated water consumption by approximately 54% or 2,669
litres a year.

6.1.5 High Efficiency Shower Heads

High efficiency showerheads consume 5.7 LPM, while ultra-low flow showerheads consume 3.8 LPM and
conventional showerheads consume 9.5 LPM. As shown in Table 1-7, the Site building currently makes
use of fifteen (15) shower heads. The flowrates of the showers were assumed to be 9.6 LPM. Converting
shower heads to ultra-low flow models would reduce the associated water consumption by approximately
60% or 873062 litres a year. In addition, the retrofit would reduce energy consumption associated with
domestic hot water heating by approximately 54 GJ.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 37 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 6-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with plumbing fixture retrofit at the Erin
Community Centre

Annual Annual System Incentives Simple Payback


Implement
Savings Savings ($) Cost ($) Available ($) (years)

Immediately 104.4 5,437


Water (m3) Water
4,400 1,098 <1
39.5 198
Gas (GJ) Gas

IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh


Incentive Details
of Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

Install a meter on the main water line and sub-meters at the irrigation and Domestic Hot
Water.

Based on information gathered on Site, there is no meter on the main water line and there are no sub
meters installed on the irrigation or domestic hot water. It is highly recommended that the sub-meters be
installed and recorded on a regular basis to track water consumption. Sub-metering will not save water
but will help identify water consumption trends and opportunities for savings.

Maintenance on Water Fixtures and Mechanical Equipment

Regular inspection of valves and faucets should be completed in order to minimize the risk of broken
fixture components from leaking water, resulting in higher than average water bills. For instance, flush
valve diaphragms can crack, leak, and waste approximately 10,000 gallons of water annually (based on
USA EPA studies). While flush valves are not in use, it is reasonable to conclude that leaking flapper
valves and faucets will also lead to considerable amounts of water being wasted. The maintenance
measures should be implemented into the general building maintenance list.

From an operation and maintenance standpoint, Pinchin has the following recommendations:

• Inspect water closets for silent leaks by adding food colouring to the water reservoir and
checking the bowl for any signs of colour after 10 minutes of adding the food colouring;

• Perform quarterly walkthroughs to check for leaks in piping or water fixtures;

• Install durable high quality O-rings when carrying out repairs to water fixtures; and

• Communicate with occupants to report any leaks as soon as they are detected.

Continue to implement an aggressive preventative maintenance program for the DHW system systems to
reduce the rejection rate from both systems and increase performance efficiency.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 38 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Ice Resurfacer

It is common for operators of ice resurfacer to fill the tank to its fill capacity instead of the minimum level
of water required for ice resurfacing. If the tank is filled beyond the minimum requirements, the extra
water will cool down without being used and the energy spent to heat the extra water will go to waste. As
much as 344,736 litres ($1,370) could be wasted annually due to this practice.

Review the operating guide for the ice resurfacer and Install a gauge so that operators can tell when the
unit is sufficiently filled.

7.0 LIGHTING RECOMMENDATIONS

Light Fixture Retrofit

The majority of interior lighting at the Site Building is assumed to be a mixture of the following:

• 2’x4’ recessed troffers with four 32W T8 fluorescent tube lamps and electronic ballasts;

• 2’x4’ High Bay fixtures with four or six 28W T5 fluorescent lamps with electronic ballasts

• High Bay Metal Halide Lamps, 200 W;

• Incandescent, Fluorescent and Halogen Bulbs

• Exterior 150W HPS wall pack

• Halogen Pot Lights; and

• Exterior 250W Metal Halide Light standards

While the fluorescent T8s are efficient compared to older T12 lights, modern LED T8s are 63% more
efficient than the equivalent fluorescent lamp [going from 32 W to 12W]. The LED bulbs are
approximately 30% more efficient than their CFL counterparts.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 39 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 7-1 Energy consumption comparison of existing and proposed lighting.

350.0
305.7
300.0
Consumption (GJ)
Annual Electrical

250.0
200.0
150.0 130.8

100.0
50.0
-
Current Lighting System Proposed Lighting System

The LED retrofit will allow for less maintenance due to their improved longevity when compared to
fluorescent and metal halide fixtures. As the cost and lifespan of fixtures will fluctuate, the payback period
will not factor in maintenance related savings. Pinchin does not expect comfort/health benefits to be
obtained.

As outlined in Figure 7-1, the recommended improvements to the lighting system are expected to reduce
annual electricity consumption by up to 175 GJ, and the power demand by up to 0.12 GJ. These
reductions translate to $9,470 in annual savings. Table 7-1 outlines the estimated costs, savings and
incentives associated with implementing the recommended lighting upgrades at Erin Community Centre.

Table 7-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with lighting retrofit at Erin Community
Centre

Annual
Demand Annual System Incentives
Energy Simple Payback
Implement Reduction Savings Cost Available
Savings (years)
(GJ) ($) ($) ($)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.09 175 6,034 80,000 9,470 12

Incentive Details IESO “Retrofit Program”: $400/kW of Demand Savings

Note: Assumes an average of 2.34 weekly operating hours for low use rooms and 12 hours for exterior
lighting (7 days a week).

Table 7-2 summarizes the type and quantity of lights existing lighting system and the proposed lighting
system for the Site Building.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 40 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 7-2 Summary of Existing and Proposed Lighting Fixtures on Site


Note: * Denotes assumed value.

Watts Lamps Present Annual Proposed Proposed Proposed Annual


Hrs of # of
Area Type per per Demand Consumed Lighting Watts Demand Savings
OPR Fixtures
Lamp Fixture (kW) (kWh) System Lamp (kW) (kWh)
W.R. 4' Surface Mount Linear 1568 32 2 8 0.51 803 4’ LED T8 12 0.19 502
Fluorescent T8
Closets/ 4' Suspended Linear 132 32 2 3 0.19 25 4’ LED T8 12 0.07 16
Storage Fluorescent T8
rooms
4' Suspended Linear 132 32 3 1 0.10 13 4’ LED T8 12 0.04 8
Fluorescent T8
Entrances CFL Bulb 4380 14 1 12 0.17 736 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.11 263
Change 4' Suspended Linear 2088 32 2 35 2.24 4677 4’ LED T8 12 0.84 2923
Rooms Fluorescent T8
CFL A19 Bulb 2088 32 1 5 0.16 334 4’ LED T8 9 0.05 240
Equipment 4' Suspended Linear 132 32 2 21 1.34 178 4’ LED T8 12 0.50 111
Rooms Fluorescent T8
Skate 4' Suspended Linear 174 32 2 6 0.38 67 4’ LED T8 12 0.14 42
Sharpening Fluorescent T8
Room
Banquet 4' Surface Mount Linear 1000 32 3 46 4.42 4416 4’ LED T8 12 1.66 2760
Hall Fluorescent T8
4' Surface Mount Linear 1000 32 2 2 0.13 128 4’ LED T8 12 0.05 80
Fluorescent T8
Track Lighting CFL 1000 32 4 3 0.38 384 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.11 276
5" LED Pot
5" CFL Pot lights 1000 25 1 19 0.48 475 Lights 7 0.13 342
Theatre 4' Surface Mount Linear 500 32 3 8 0.77 384 4’ LED T8 12 0.29 240
Area Fluorescent T8
4' Suspended Linear 500 32 2 36 2.30 1152 4’ LED T8 12 0.86 720
Fluorescent T8
Wall mounted 500 60 2 12 1.44 720 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.22 612

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 41 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Incandescent Bulb
5" CFL Pot lights 500 25 1 7 0.18 88 5" LED Pot 7 0.05 63
Lights
Stage Track Mounted 500 14 1 50 0.70 350 LED (PAR 20 7 0.35 175
Halogen PAR 20 Eq')
Sound 4' Surface Mount Linear 500 32 3 3 0.29 144 4’ LED T8 12 0.11 90
Room Fluorescent T8
CFL A19 Bulb 500 14 1 2 0.03 14 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.02 5
Concession 4' Surface Mount Linear 1540 32 2 7 0.45 690 4’ LED T8 12 0.17 431
Fluorescent T8
4' Surface Mount Linear 1540 32 3 3 0.29 444 4’ LED T8 12 0.11 277
Fluorescent T8
Adult Day 4' Surface Mount Linear 2080 32 2 2 0.13 266 4’ LED T8 12 0.05 166
Room Fluorescent T8
4' Surface Mount Linear 2080 32 3 20 1.92 3994 4’ LED T8 12 0.72 2496
Fluorescent T8
Daycare 4' Surface Mount Linear 2080 32 2 26 1.66 3461 4’ LED T8 12 0.62 2163
Fluorescent T8
Hallways 4' Surface Mount Linear 3285 32 2 29 1.86 6097 4’ LED T8 12 0.70 3811
Fluorescent T8
Stairwells 4' Surface Mount Linear 3285 32 3 3 0.29 946 4’ LED T8 13 0.12 562
Fluorescent T8
4' Surface Mount Linear 3285 32 2 3 0.19 631 4’ LED T8 13 0.08 374
Fluorescent T8
CFL A19 Bulb 3285 14 1 4 0.06 184 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.04 66
Lobby Wall Mounted 4380 14 1 8 0.11 491 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.07 175
Fluorescent
High Bay Metal Halide 2190 200 1 2 0.40 876 High Bay LED 100 0.20 438
Offices 4' Surface Mount Linear 2984 32 3 4 0.38 1146 4’ LED T8 12 0.14 716
Fluorescent T8
4' Surface Mount Linear 2984 32 2 7 0.45 1337 4’ LED T8 12 0.17 836
Fluorescent T8
Food Bank 4' Surface Mount Linear 132 32 2 11 0.70 93 LED A19 Bulb 12 0.26 58
Room Fluorescent T8

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 42 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Ice Rink 4' High Bay Linear 2088 28 6 28 4.70 9822 4’ LED T8 12 2.02 5613
Fluorescent T5
4' Suspended Linear 2088 32 4 8 1.02 2138 4’ LED T8 12 0.38 1336
Fluorescent T8
HPS Wall Pack* 4380 150* 1 15 2.25 9855 LED Wall 40 0.60 7227
Exterior Pack
Pot Light (Par 20) * 4380 50* 1 15 0.75 3285 LED 50W eq' 8 0.12 2759
Equivalent
Single Metal Halide 4380 250* 1 22 5.50 24090 LED Light 150 3.30 9636
Light Standard* Standard
Total 39 84,931 16 48,608

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 43 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Motion Controlled Light Switch Installation

The lighting systems at Erin Community Centre are generally user controlled with the exception of motion
controlled lighting in the washrooms. Pinchin recommends installing more motion detecting light switches
to control the lighting throughout the entire building. The motion detectors reduce energy loss due to
lights being left on in unoccupied rooms. One demerit of motion controlled light switches is that they will
continue operation of the lighting system for 90 seconds after the occupant has left the area. These
systems also consume energy 24/7 to remain in standby mode.

Table 7-3 outlines the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with implementing the motion
controlled light switch upgrades after the LED lighting retrofit at Erin Community Centre.

Table 7-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with Motion Controlled Light Switch
installation at Erin Community Centre

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.01 20 705 3,000 1,500 2

Incentive Details IESO “Retrofit Program”: 50% of the Eligible Costs

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already in
place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

8.0 BUILDING ENVELOPE RECOMMENDATIONS

Window Retrofit

Pinchin completed a review of the current window systems throughout the building during the on-Site
review. Window assemblies are mostly from construction of the original building (1977), and of the
additions (1992, 2000, and 2010). Windows from the original construction areas (1977) have exceeded
their PUL, and the 1992 and 2000 addition window assemblies are expected to reach their PUL soon.
The Site staff reportedly experience drafts adjacent to the window systems.

Pinchin used the software Lbnl Window to calculate the overall U-value of the current windows. The heat
loss from existing windows were calculated as 59.8 GJ, resulting in $400 of associated utility costs.

Pinchin has modelled the heat transfer for two different types of replacement windows. The first proposed
option is a full replacement with double glazed window systems with an adjusted U-value of 1.40 W/m2K,

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 44 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

as mandated by Energy Star for Climate Zone 2. The replacement windows are anticipated as being vinyl
framed.

The second proposed option is a full replacement with triple glazed window systems with an adjusted U-
value of 0.8 W/m2K. The replacement windows are anticipated as being vinyl framed.

The analysis used an average of the 2017 and 2018 climate and energy data to determine potential
energy savings. The new double glazing and triple glazing windows would have only accounted for 26.4
GJ and 15.1 GJ respectively. The associated annual energy cost is approximately $175 for double
glazing windows and $100 for triple glazing windows. The proposed systems would result in 60% and
78% less heat loss than the old windows and an annual savings of $223 and 298 respectively (refer to
Figure 8-1).

Figure 8-1 Energy consumption comparison of existing DG windows and proposed DG and Triple
glazing window replacement

70.0
59.8
Annual Electricity Consumption (GJ)

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0 26.4

20.0 15.1

10.0

-
Existing Glazing New Double Glazing Triple Glazing

Table 8-1 and Table 8-2 outline the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with implementing
the recommended window upgrades at Erin Community Centre. The window replacement will also reduce
the building’s cooling load, however due to many unknown variables, this benefit has not been factored
into the savings and payback period.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 45 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 8-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with full DG window replacement at Erin
Community Centre

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Phased as ex. units N/A 33.4 223 37,000 928 162


achieve their PUL

Incentive Details IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or
$0.10/kWh of Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs

Note: Assumes an allowance of $85 per square foot.


Assumes an exterior grade sealant applied to perimeter window frames with an allowance of $6 per linear
foot.

Table 8-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with full triple glazing window replacement at
Erin Community Centre

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Phased as ex. units N/A 44.7 298 48,000 1,242 157


achieve their PUL

Incentive Details IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or
$0.10/kWh of Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs

Note: Assumes an allowance of $85 per square foot.


Assumes an exterior grade sealant applied to perimeter window frames with an allowance of $6 per linear
foot.

Supplemental Roof Insulation

Pinchin completed a review of the roofing system of Site building during the on-Site review. Based on
typical construction methods, observed blisters and reported leaks, Pinchin assumes the current roof
assembly R value (imperial) is approximately R24. Pinchin calculated the heat loss from the roof as
approximately 333 GJ/year, resulting in an annual energy cost of approximately $2,220.

Pinchin recommends supplementing the insulation levels to reach R42. The additional insulation would
only account for approximately 190 GJ/year based on the local 2017-2018 heating degree-days. The
associated annual energy cost is approximately $1270. The proposed insulation levels would result in
50% less heat loss than the existing levels and an annual savings of $950.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 46 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 8-3 outlines the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with supplementing the roof
insulation levels at Erin Community Centre. The insulation will also reduce the buildings refrigeration load,
however due to many unknown variables it has not been factored into the savings and payback period.
Note the cost is for the additional insulation and does not cover the cost of the roof replacement.

Table 8-3: Summary of Costs and Savings associated with Supplemental Attic Insulation at Erin
Community Centre

Implement Demand Annual Annual System Incentives Payback


Reduction Energy Savings Cost ($) Available with
(kW) Savings ($) ($) Incentives
(kWh)

During next roof N/A 143 951 173,000 3,962 178


replacement

Incentive Details IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or
$0.10/kWh of Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs

Supplemental Wall Insulation

Pinchin completed a review of the exterior wall system of Site building during the on-Site review. Based
on the architectural drawings and construction methods in the 1970, Pinchin assumes the current wall
assembly is R10 on average.

Pinchin calculated the heat loss from the exterior wall system as approximately 211 GJ/year, resulting in
an annual energy cost of approximately $1,300.

Pinchin recommends supplementing the insulation levels to reach R40 (with exception of the third floor).
The new insulation levels would only account for approximately 53 GJ/year based on the average 2017-
2018 annual heating degree days. The associated annual energy cost is approximately $350. The
proposed insulation levels would result in 75% less heat loss than the existing levels and an annual
savings of $940.

Table 8-4 outlines the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with supplementing the wall
insulation levels at Erin Community Centre. The insulation will also reduce the buildings cooling load,
however due to many unknown variables it has not been factored into the savings and payback period.
Pinchin presents this option aware that it may lead to a loss of architectural character at the Site Building.
We therefore recommend this retrofit to take place when/if building envelope repairs are required due to
the poor thermal performance (i.e. significant cracking).

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 47 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 8-4 Summary of costs and savings associated with supplemental wall insulation at Erin
Community Centre

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

During building
N/A 159 938 115,000 4,405 118
envelope repairs

Incentive IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or


$0.10/kWh of Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs

Continued Inspections

Pinchin recommends regular building condition inspections to prevent against deteriorations going
unknown. Ongoing preventative maintenance ensures small-scale deficiencies are addressed before they
lead to a large-scale capital projects being required premature to the end of their lifespan.

Bi-monthly roof inspections should be conducted to ensure the following:

• Eavestroughs area continuous, secured firmly in place and clear of debris: and

• Signs of water infiltration should be identified and remediated.

Eavestroughs are particularly susceptible to damage in the winter months. Water can infiltrate into the
flashing edges, expands during the freeze temperatures and thaw, leaving behind gaps allowing water to
penetrate further into the roof system. Pinchin expects this measure to yield energy savings; however, no
comfort or maintenance benefits are expected.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 48 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

9.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

The following table is a summary of the major utility saving projects identified for Erin Community Centre.

Annual Annual Annual Annua Annual


Est. Grant Est.
Electrical Gas Water l GHG Cost Potential Est. Cost
Recommendation Incentive Payback
Savings Savings Savings Saving Savings Savings (%) ($)
($) (Yrs.)
(GJ) (GJ) (m3) s (Kg) ($)

Programmable 119
19
4.1 Thermostats (33,081 10,136 1,498 1.9% 9,000 3,511 3.7
(519 m3)
Installation kWh)
561
27
4.2 BAS Installation (15.052 31,262 4,590 8.3% 274,000 14,917 56
(7,631 kWh)
m3)
107
258
4.3 RTU Replacement (29,670 21,608 4,977 5.1% 120,000 10,134 22
(6,928 m3)
kWh)
MUA Replacement 439
8
4.4 -High Efficiency (11.777 23,435 2,494 6.3% 100,000 17,209 33
(2,257 kWh)
Replacement m3)
Boiler 67
4.5 3,508 338 0.9% 30,000 2,874 80
Replacement (1,811 m3)
IR Tube Heater -
7
4.6 Two Stage 387 37 0.1% 10,000 0 268
(200 m3)
Replacement
Unit Heater -
6
4.7 Condensing 334 32 0.1% 5,000 0 155
(1,702 m3)
Replacement
622
Drain Heat
4.8 (16,701 32,350 3,119 8.7% 20,000 10,000 3.2
Recovery Retrofit
m3)
DHW Heater -
63
4.9 Tankless 3,416 329 0.9% 40,000 3,824 109.9
(173 m3)
Replacement
1,703
Ice plant - Heat
4.10 (45,731 88,582 11,499 24.0% 70,000 35,000 3.0
Recovery
m3)
69
Brine Pump VFD
5.1 (19,141 5,283 2,281 1.0% 20,000 1,914 7.9
Installation
kWh)
Brine Pump -
Program 17
5.2 1,335 616 0.2% 5,000 0 8.1
Temperature (4,836 kWh)
Setbacks
Zamboni 15
5.3 800 641 0.2% 100,000 0 156
Replacement (4,902 m3)
Domestic Water 40
6.1 1,370 2,055 5,635 0.6% 4,400 1,098 0.6
Fixture Retrofits (1,061 m3)
175
7.1 Lighting Retrofit (48,608 13,416 6,026 2.5% 80,000 9,470 11.7
kWh)
Motion Controlled 20
7.2 1,525 703 0.3% 3,000 0 4.3
Light Switches (5,524kWh)
8.1.1 DG Window 2 31 0
1,791 223 0.5% 37,000 0 166
Replacement (591 kWh) (413 m3)
8.1.2 TG Window 3 42 0
2,396 298 0.6% 48,000 0 161
Replacement (790 kWh) (1,125 m3)
8.2 134 0
Supplemental Roof 9
(3,5874,90 7,643 951 2.0% 173,000 3,962 178
Insulation (2,521 kWh)
2 m3)
8.3 Supplemental Wall 10 148 0
8,498 938 2.2% 115,000 4,405 118
Insulation (2,803 kWh) (3,988 m3)

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 49 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

10.0 DISCARDED CONSIDERATIONS

All energy savings measures that Pinchin considered have been recommended in this report.

11.0 NON-FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

Pinchin has also reviewed the potential conservation measures with consideration to non-financial
benefits classified into the following:

1. Potential improvements to health and safety within the Site building.

2. Potential improvements to operational procedures within the Site building.

3. Potential improvements occupant comfort within the Site building.

All energy savings measures that Pinchin considered have been recommended in this report.

12.0 RECOMMENDED ITEMS FOR ASHRAE LEVEL III (CAPITAL GRADE) ENERGY AUDIT

Pinchin recommends a capital grade analysis of the following measures:

• VFDs at pumps and VSDs at motors (Recommendation 5.1)

• Model the reduction in corresponding energy savings.

• Demand Control Ventilation (Recommendation 5.3)

o Model the reduction in corresponding electricity savings due to reduced exhaust fan
operation.

• Window Replacement (Recommendation Error! Reference source not found.)

• Model the reduction in heat gain during the summer months and corresponding
energy savings.

• Supplemental Wall Insulation (Recommendation 8.2)

• Model the reduction in heat gain during the summer months and corresponding
energy savings.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 50 of 50


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
September 30, 2019
14 Boland Dr, Erin, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

13.0 TERMS AND LIMITATIONS

This work was performed subject to the Terms and Limitations presented or referenced in the proposal for
this project.

Information provided by Pinchin is intended for Client use only. Pinchin will not provide results or
information to any party unless disclosure by Pinchin is required by law. Any use by a third party of
reports or documents authored by Pinchin or any reliance by a third party on or decisions made by a third
party based on the findings described in said documents, is the sole responsibility of such third parties.
Pinchin accepts no responsibility for damages suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or
actions conducted. No other warranties are implied or expressed.

The information provided in this report is based upon analysis of available documents, analytical results,
records and drawings, and personal contacts and interviews. In performing the assessment, Pinchin has
relied in good faith on information provided by the individuals noted in this report. Pinchin has assumed
that the documents, analytical results, records and drawings, and information provided by the individuals
noted in this report, including information provided in contacts and personal interviews, is factual and
accurate. Pinchin accepts no responsibility for any deficiency, misstatement or inaccuracy contained in
this report as a result of negligence, omissions, misinterpretations or fraudulent acts of persons
interviewed or contacted, or contained in reports that were reviewed, and makes no representation or
warranty as to the qualifications of any such persons or the reliability of information or reports provided by
them, whether or not such persons were introduced to the Client by Pinchin.

Pinchin did not attempt to identify locations of deposition of mould spores or particles, or minor mould
growth that would not exhibit any signs of spotting/staining on building materials. Pinchin would not be
able to identify locations of concealed mould growth within wall cavities and other hidden locations
without performing intrusive inspections. The degree of mould growth noted in the report may change with
time if water or humidity issues continue or develop after the assessment date(s). Any sources of water
infiltration or high humidity must be corrected to prevent the continuation or occurrence of mould growth.
Air sampling results (if any) will apply only to the time and conditions of the testing and may not be used
to reliably predict conditions on other days.
J:\241000s\0241444.000 TofErin,VariousSites,Erin,BSS,BCA\Deliverables\Energy Audits\Final Reports\Erin CC\241444 FINAL ASHRAE Level II EA, Erin CC, T of Erin, 14
Boland Dr, Erin, ON Sept 30, 2019.docx1459, Steeles & Weston, Proposal

Template: Master Report for Energy Audit, BSS, July 3, 2018

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 51 of 50


APPENDIX I
Utility Bill Data
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Gas (m3)

Dec-16 31 12,490
Jan-17 35 3,090
Feb-17 30 31,161
Mar-17 28 11,714
Apr-17 32 15,351
May-17 27 8,552
Jun-17 36 4,263
Jul-17 24 589
Aug-17 32 598
Sep-18 400 2,405
Oct-17 -337 4,793
Nov-17 27 10,773
Dec-17 32 22,470
Jan-18 29 22,532
Feb-18 31 24,946
Mar-18 29 18,025
Apr-18 35 23,345
May-18 29 6,980
Jun-18 30 2,422
Jul-18 27 671
Aug-18 31 634
Sep-18 35 1,448
Oct-18 28 4,972
Nov-18 30 15,527
Dec-18 31 21,136
Jan-19 33 23,356
Mar-19 28 22,144
Apr-19 33 19,042
May-19 28 10,648

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 6


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Electricity (kWh)

Nov-16 30 82,440
Dec-16 31 79,380
Feb-17 34 91,080
Feb-17 26 63,180
Mar-17 28 63,900
Apr-17 31 25,740
May-17 32 13,680
Jun-17 29 15,480
Jul-17 30 9,000
Aug-17 17 14,220
Sep-18 410 68,760
Oct-17 -333 79,200
Nov-17 29 69,840
Dec-17 31 76,680
Jan-18 31 78,120
Feb-18 30 74,700
Apr-18 35 88,200
Apr-18 26 24,660
May-18 30 16,020
Jul-18 35 19,980
Jul-18 26 13,680
Sep-18 38 34,560
Sep-18 22 56,700
Oct-18 32 82,980
Nov-18 14 74,340
Dec-18 31 81,720

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 6


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Liquid Propane Gas (Pounds)

Nov-16 30 82,440
Dec-16 31 79,380
Feb-17 34 91,080
Feb-17 26 63,180
Dec-16 35 66
Dec-16 9 165
Dec-16 7 66
Jan-17 4 10
Jan-17 8 132
Jan-17 7 132
Jan-17 7 165
Jan-17 7 132
Feb-17 7 132
Feb-17 7 132
Feb-17 7 132
Feb-17 7 132
Mar-17 7 132
Mar-17 7 132
Mar-17 7 66
Mar-17 6 99
Mar-17 1 132
Apr-17 6 99
Apr-17 1 132
Apr-17 6 132
Apr-17 7 33
Aug-17 120 264
Sep-17 28 99
Sep-17 7 66
Sep-17 7 99
Oct-17 7 99
Oct-17 7 99

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 3 of 6


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Liquid Propane Gas (Pounds)

Oct-17 7 99
Oct-17 7 132
Oct-17 7 99
Nov-17 7 132
Nov-17 7 99
Nov-17 7 132
Nov-17 7 132
Dec-17 7 99
Dec-17 7 132
Dec-17 7 132
Dec-17 8 99
Jan-18 34 132
Feb-18 14 99
Feb-18 7 132
Feb-18 7 132
Mar-18 7 165
Mar-18 7 132
Mar-18 7 99
Aug-18 148 264
Oct-18 48 231
Oct-18 7 33
Oct-18 14 99
Oct-18 7 99
Nov-18 7 99
Nov-18 7 132
Nov-18 7 99
Nov-18 7 132
Dec-18 7 99
Dec-18 7 99
Dec-18 7 99
Dec-18 6 99
Jan-19 9 66

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 4 of 6


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Liquid Propane Gas (Pounds)

Jan-19 6 104
Jan-19 7 99
Jan-19 7 99
Jan-19 7 132
Feb-19 7 165
Feb-19 7 128
Feb-19 7 132
Feb-19 7 104
Mar-19 7 165
Mar-19 7 66
Mar-19 7 132
Mar-19 7 128
Apr-19 7 66
Apr-19 7 165

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 5 of 6


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Water (m3)

Mar-17 90 1283
Jun-17 89 711
Sep-17 93 587
Dec-17 76 1241
Mar-18 99 2427
Jun-18 91 462
Sep-18 100 972
Dec-18 75 1414
Apr-19 115 1420
Jun-19 73 254
Mar-17 90 1283
Jun-17 89 711

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 6 of 6


APPENDIX II
Photographs
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

View of cooling tower pump and the brine pump located in the compressor room.

General view of the ice rink with high bay T5 fluorescent lighting.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 2


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

View of typical lavatory faucets with 5.7 LPM flow rates.

General view of the Snack Bar location within the Site Building.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 2


APPENDIX III
Mechanical Equipment List
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

*Assumed Value

Remaining
Unit Make Model # Output (HP) Cond. PUL Age
Lifespan

Furnace #1 Keep Rite G9MXE1202 120,000 Btuh Good 10 8 2


422A

Slant Fin GG300HXP Fair to


25
Boiler "Galazy" E 300,000 Btuh Good 25 1

Indirect Bradford
12
Water Heater White RTV-119-L 575 W Fair 20 8

MUA (HVAC
Unknown 20
- 3) ENG A 1,000,000 Btuh* Poor 30 10

Carrier
RTU (HVAC - "Weather 48HJF006--- 20
13) master" 131-- 150,000 Btuh Poor 25 5

Carrier
RTU (HVAC - "Weather 48HJF006--- Fair to 20
14) master" 131-- 150,000 Btuh Poor 25 5

Carrier
"Weather 48HJE008--- Fair to 20
RTU #1 master" 131-- 180,000 Btuh Poor 25 5

ZF090N15N Fair to
5
RTU #2 York 5AAA5A 180,000 Btuh Good 25 20

ZH150N24D Fair to
2
RTU #3 York 5B1BAA1A1 240,000 Btuh Good 25 23

ZH150N24D Fair to
2
RTU #4 York 5B1BAA1A2 240,000 Btuh Good 25 23

ZF090N15N Fair to
5
RTU #5 York 5AAA5A 180,000 Btuh Poor 25 20

4YCC3030A
14
RTU #6 Trane 1075AA 2.5 Ton Fair 25 11

RTU #7 Trane Unknown 58.6 kW* Fair 25 Unknown 6*

Fair to
Unknown Unknown Unknown
Unit Heater 40,000 Btuh* Poor 20 6

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 4


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

Force Flow
Stelpro WF3008T 9
Heater #1 3000 W Fair 15 6

Force Flow
Stelpro WF3008T 9
Heater #2 3000 W Fair 15 6

Force Flow
Stelpro Unknown Unknown
Heater #3 2000 W* Fair 15 6

Force Flow
Unknown Unknown Unknown
Heater #4 1000 W* Fair 15 6

Baseboard
Unknown Unknown Unknown
Heater #1 1750 W Fair 15 6

Baseboard
Unknown Unknown Unknown
Heater #2 1000 W* Fair 15 6

Re-
verber- Unknown Unknown

IR Tube ray 50,000 Btuh* Poor 20 3

MUA- Kitchen Spring Air SFA 10 0V 2 HP Poor 30 Unknown 1

MUA- Kitchen Spring Air SFA 10 0V 1 HP Poor 30 Unknown 1

John
Wood JWSC80- Poor -
39
"Signatur 250N Not in
DHW # 1 e Series" 250,000 Btuh Use 12 0

DHW # 2 Lochinvar SNA400-125 400,000 Btuh Poor 12 2 10

DHW # 3 Lochinvar SNA400-125 400,000 Btuh Good 12 2 10

DHW # 4 AO Smith BT 100 80,000 Btuh Fair to 12 26 0


Y00N000000 Poor

DHW # 5 AO Smith BT 100 300 75,100 Btuh Fair to 12 3 9


Good

Unknown
Chiller Unknown Unknown 60 HP* Fair 25 2

Unknown
Evaporative BAC JC1-80 1174 MBH Fair 18 5
Condenser

Unknown
Dehumidifier Blanchar D47.5G 10,260 W Fair 20 1
d-ness

Unknown
Dehumidifier Blanchar D47.5G 10,260 W Fair 20 1
d-ness

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 4


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

Pumps and Motors – Erin Community Centre


*Assumed Value

Remaining
Function Make Model Capacity PUL Age
Lifespan
Jacket Marathon WK56T34D6662B- 1 HP Fair 25 Unknown
Pump R10

Brine Pump Unknown Unknown 20 HP * Poor 25 Unknown

Compressor Weg Unknown 30 HP* Fair 25 5


No.1 Motor

Compressor Weg CC029A 30 HP Fair 25 1


No.2 Motor

Evaporative Weg Unknown 3HP* Fair 10 Unknown


Condenser
Pump

Evaporative Tormont ATC170E1G 7.5 HP Fair 20 Unknown


Condenser
Fan

Evaporative Tormont ATC170E1G 1/2 HP Fair 10 Unknown


Condenser
Spray Pump

Boiler Pump Bell & Unknown 1/3 HP Good 15 7*


Gosset

Elevator Mongomery 8506-66 20 HP Fair - Good 35 Unknown


Motor Kone

Exhaust Fan Unknown Unknown 3/4 HP* Fair 20 Unknown


- Ice Rink

Exhaust Unknown Unknown 1/4 HP* Fair 20 Unknown


Fans (2) -
Ice Rink

Exhaust Fan Unknown Unknown 1/4 HP* Fair 20 Unknown


(11) -
Washrooms

Exhaust Fan Unknown Unknown 50 W* Fair 20 Unknown


(5) -
Washrooms

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 3 of 4


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

Exhaust Fan Unknown Unknown 350 W* Fair 20 9


- Washroom

Exhaust Fan Unknown Unknown 50 W* Fair 20 9


- Washroom

Exhaust Fan Shop Unknown 50 W* Fair 20 9


- Shop

Upwards Kitchen Unknown 1 HP Fair 20 Unknown


Exhaust
Fans (2) -
Kitchen

Exhaust Fan GreenHeck GB-100-4 1/4 HP Fair 20 Unknown

Exhaust Fan Power 709J E38491 1/2 HP Fair 20 Unknown


Ventilator

Exhaust Fan Power Unknown 1/2 HP Fair 20 Unknown


Ventilator
"FUMEX"

MUA - Spring Air SFA 10 0V 2 HP Poor 30 Unknown


Kitchen

MUA - Spring Air SFA 10 0V 1 HP Poor 30 Unknown


Kitchen

Range Hood Unknown Unknown 1HP* Unknown 20 Unknown

Motor - Ice Zamboni 445 Unknown Good 10 12


Resurfacer

Elevator Garventa Unknown 5 HP* Fair - Good 35 Unknown


Motor

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 4 of 4


APPENDIX IV
Ranking of Measures
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Ranking of Measures Appendix IV

Ranking of Measures

Annual Annual Annual Annual Estimated


Annual Potential Estimated
Gas Water Cost GHG Estimated Grant
Section Recommendation Electrical Savings Payback
Savings Savings Savings Savings Cost ($) Incentive
Savings (GJ) (%/year) (Years)
(GJ) (m3) ($) (Tonnes) ($)

6.1 Domestic Water - 39.5 1,370 2,055 5,635 0.6% 4,400 1,098 1
Fixture Retrofits

7.2 Motion Controlled Light 19.9 - - 1,525 705 0.3% 3,000 1,500 2
Switches

4.1 Ice plant - Heat - - - 88,582 11,501 24.0% 70,000 35,000 3


Recovery

4.8 Drain Heat Recovery - - - 32,350 3,119 8.7% 20,000 10,000 3


Retrofit

4.1 Programmable 119.1 - - 10,136 1,505 1.9% 9,000 3,511 4


Thermostats
Installation

5.2 Brine Pump - Program 17.4 - - 1,335 617 0.2% 5,000 484 7.3
Temperature Setbacks

5.1 Brine Pump VFD 68.9 - - 5,283 2,283 1.0% 20,000 1,914 8
Installation

7.1 Lighting Retrofit 175.0 - - 13,416 6,034 2.5% 80,000 9,470 12

4.3 RTU Replacement 106.8 258.0 - 21,608 4,982 5.1% 120,000 10,134 22

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 2


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Ranking of Measures Appendix IV

4.4 MUA Replacement - 8.1 438.6 - 23,435 2,494 6.3% 100,000 12,409 35
High Efficiency
Replacement

4.2 BAS Installation 27.5 560.5 - 31,262 4,590 8.3% 274,000 14,917 56

4.5 Boiler Replacement - 67.4 - 3,508 338 0.9% 30,000 1,874 83

8.3 Supplemental Wall - 148.5 - 8,498 938 2.2% 115,000 4,405 118
Insulation

4.9 DHW Heater - - 63.4 - 3,296 318 0.9% 40,000 1,760 120
Tankless Replacement

5.3 Zamboni Replacement - 15.4 - 800 641 0.2% 100,000 427 155

8.1.2 TG Window - 41.9 - 2,396 298 0.6% 48,000 1,242 157


Replacement

8.1.1 DG Window - 31.3 - 1,791 223 0.5% 37,000 928 162


Replacement

8.2 Supplemental Roof 9.1 133.6 - 7,643 951 2.0% 173,000 3,962 178
Insulation

4.7 Unit Heater - - 6.4 - 334 32 0.1% 15,000 178 460


Condensing
Replacement

4.6 IR Tube Heater - Two - 7.4 - 387 37 0.1% 40,000 207 1,065
Stage Replacement

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 2


APPENDIX V
Assumptions and Calculations
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

Calculating Current Loads:

Load Inventory

Assumptions (Based on observed data, drawings or similar products):

Assumed
Assumed input
Annual
Category Description Location Qty Power
Operating
Unit
Hours

Serves Upper Cafeteria


Cooling RTU 1 1337 5 Ton
area
Cooling RTU Serves Room 128 1 1337 7.5 Ton
Adult day center,
Cooling RTU common area and office 1 1337 7.5 Ton
areas
Cooling MUA Serves theatre 1 1337 17,250 W
Adult day center,
Cooling RTU common area and office 1 1337 7.5 Ton
areas
Cooling RTU Serves Theatre/lobby 1 1337 12.5 Ton
Cooling RTU Serves Theatre/lobby 1 1337 12.5 Ton
Cooling RTU Serves Offices 1 1337 12.5 Ton
Cooling RTU Serves Theatre/lobby 1 1337 12.5 Ton
Cooling RTU -(AC-1) Serves Change Rooms 1 1337 12.5 Ton
DHW -
DHW Zamboni 0 0 250,000 Btuh
Room
DHW - New
DHW Change 2 1616 400,000 Btuh
Rooms
DHW -
DHW Second 1 1616 80,000 Btuh
Floor
DHW -
DHW Second 1 1616 75,100 Btuh
Floor
Elevator Elevator Elevator Room 1 486 15 HP
Office IR
Heating Skate Sharpening Room 1 192 1,500 W
Heater
Force Flow
Heating Change Room Hall 2 5032 3,000 W
Heaters
Force Flow
Heating 2 5032 2,000 W
Heaters

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 10


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

Baseboard
Heating Minor Hockey Office 1 5032 1,750 W
Heater
Baseboard
Heating Elevator Room 1 5032 1,000 W
Heater
Indirect
Heating Water 1 5032 575 W
Heater
Heating Boiler Pump 1 5032 0.33 HP
Gas Fired
Heating 1 1177 300,000 Btuh
Iron Boiler
Heating RTU Serves theatre 1 1177 1,000,000 Btuh
Serves Upper Cafeteria
Heating RTU 1 1177 150,000 Btuh
area
Heating RTU Serves Room 128 1 1177 180,000 Btuh
Adult day center,
Heating RTU common area and office 1 1177 180,000 Btuh
areas
Heating RTU Serves Theatre/lobby 1 1177 240,000 Btuh
Heating RTU Serves Theatre/lobby 1 1177 240,000 Btuh
Heating RTU Serves Offices 1 1177 180,000 Btuh
Heating RTU Serves Theatre/lobby 1 1177 150,000 Btuh
Heating RTU (HV-1) Serves Change Rooms 1 1177 58,600 W
Heating Unit Heater Shop 1 1177 13,200 W
Heating IR Tube Zamboni Room 1 1177 50,000 Btuh
Ice Plant Dehumidifier Arena 1 563.2 10,260 W
Ice Plant Dehumidifier Arena 1 563.2 10,260 W
Ice Plant Jacket Pump Ice Plant 1 3200 1 HP
Ice Plant Brine Pump Ice Plant 1 2688 18 HP
Compressor
Ice Plant Ice Plant 1 3200 27 HP
Pump No. 1
Compressor
Ice Plant Ice Plant 1 3200 26 HP
Pump No. 2
Evaporative
Ice Plant Condenser Ice Plant 1 2400 3 HP
Pump
Evaporative
Ice Plant Condenser Ice Plant 1 2400 7 HP
Fan
Evaporative
Ice Plant Condenser Ice Plant 1 2400 1 HP
Pump
Walk-in
Kitchen Food Bank 1 2628 2 HP
Cooler

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 10


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

Fridge -
Kitchen Food Bank Food Bank 1 8760 575 W
(ES)
Fridge -
Kitchen Food Bank Food Bank 1 8760 575 W
(ES)
Kitchen Fridge Banquet Hall 1 8760 575 W
Kitchen Cooler Banquet Hall 2 8760 575 W
Coffee
Kitchen Snack Bar 1 800 4,050 W
Machine
Slushy
Kitchen Snack Bar 1 800 1,440 W
Machine
Kitchen Cooler Snack Bar 1 800 220 W
Kitchen Fridge Kitchen 1 800 909 W
Kitchen Freezer Kitchen 1 800 575 W
Kitchen Dishwasher Kitchen 1 84.5 9,020 W
Kitchen Kettle Kitchen 1 800 1,350 W
Coffee
Kitchen Kitchen 1 800 1,350 W
Maker
Popcorn
Kitchen Concession Stand 1 800 820 W
Machine
Coffee
Kitchen Adult Day Room 1 365 1,350 W
Machine
Kitchen Fridge Adult Day Room 2 8760 345 W
Kitchen Fridge General 1 8760 345 W
Kitchen Dishwasher Day Care 1 260 1,800 W
Kitchen Stove Day Care 1 1 519,000 W
Kitchen Fridge Day Care 1 8760 690 W
Kitchen Rangehood Day Care 1 260 1 HP
Kitchen Deep Fryer Kitchen 1 800 100,000.0 Btuh
Range top -
Kitchen Kitchen 1 800 35,169.0 W
6 Burner
Plug Load Scoreboard Arena 1 1856 600 W
Garage Door
Plug Load Zamboni room 1 224 1 HP
Opener
Plug Load Floor Buffer Mechanical Room 1 2 750 W
Plug Load Vacuum Skate Sharpening Room 1 192 5 HP
Skate
Plug Load Skate Sharpening Room 1 192 200 W
Sharpener
Plug Load TV (ES) Skate Sharpening Room 1 96 200 W
Plug Load Stereo Skate Sharpening Room 1 96 400 W
Plug Load DVD Player Skate Sharpening Room 1 96 16 W
Plug Load Fridge Skate Sharpening Room 1 8760 518 W

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 10


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

Plug Load Stereo Theatre Room 1 128 8,000 W


Stage
Plug Load Theatre Room 6 128 60 W
Controller
Plug Load Projector Theatre Room 1 128 310 W
Plug Load Monitor Theatre Room 1 128 75 W
Plug Load Computer Theatre Room 1 128 30 W
Plug Load Speakers Theatre Room 2 128 240 W
Plug Load Speakers Theatre 12 128 240 W
Plug Load Microwave Offices 4 91.25 1,000 W
Plug Load Coffee Pot Offices 1 182.5 1,350 W
Security
Plug Load Offices 26 8760 6 W
Cameras
Plug Load Small Printer Offices 2 8760 44 W
Plug Load Computer Offices 7 5096 75 W
Plug Load Monitor Offices 9 5096 30 W
Plug Load Heat Sealer Offices 1 10 500 W
Plug Load Shredder Offices 2 10 70 W
Plug Load Mini Fridge Offices 4 8760 518 W
Plug Load Phone Offices 6 8760 2 W
Vending
Plug Load General 1 3504 1,230 W
Machine
Vending
Plug Load Machine General 3 3504 1,035 W
(ES)
Vending
Plug Load General 1 3504 345 W
Machine
Plug Load TV (ES) General 2 6656 84 W
Plug Load TV (ES) General 2 6656 108 W
Plug Load Washer Day Care 1 1825 1,300 W
Plug Load Dryer Day Care 1 1825 2,760 W
Plug Load Generator 0 1 0 16,000 W
Irrigation
Plug Load 0 1 5947 28 W
Controls
Ventilation EF-1 Ice Rink Wall 1 5376 1 HP
EF - Mech
Ventilation 0 1 1825 1 HP
Rm
Ventilation EF-2 Ice Rink Wall 1 5947 0.25 HP
Ventilation EF-3 Ice Plant Wall 1 5947 0.25 HP
Ventilation EF-4-14 Washrooms 11 5947 0.25 HP
Ventilation EF Washrooms 5 5947 50 W
Home Change Rm
Ventilation EF 1 5947 350 W
Washroom

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 10


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

Ventilation EF Food Bank Washrooms 1 5947 50 W


Ventilation EF Shop 1 5947 50 W
Ventilation EF - Upward Kitchen 2 5947 1.0 HP
Ventilation EF-1 0 1 5947 0.3 HP
Ventilation EF 0 1 5947 0.5 HP
Ventilation EF 0 1 5947 0.5 HP
Pedestal
Ventilation 0 3 5947 50 W
Fans
MUA -
Ventilation 0 1 5947 2 HP
Kitchen
MUA -
Ventilation 0 1 5947 1.0 HP
Kitchen

• Sample Calculation:
14 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 7 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 52 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 75 𝑊𝑊
𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 = 7 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 × × × ×
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶
Cooling Loads

• Assumptions:
• Cooling is required 1337 hours a year (based on historic weather data)

• Sample Calculation:
12,000 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏ℎ
2.5 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 ×
𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 = 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 × 1337 ℎ𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜
13 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆
Individual Mechanical Equipment Loads

• Assumptions:

• All equipment loads with unknown operating hours will operate with equal proportion, except
heating.

• Heating equipment only operates during heating season, as determined by the portion of
Brampton HDDs from 2017 to 2018 (i.e. 98%).

• The portion of the energy that a piece of equipment uses is equal to its demand multiplied by
the seasonal proportion of their use and divided by the sum of all demands using that same
utility (gas/electric) whose annual loads do not have assumed operating hours (i.e. lighting,
elevators, standalone coolers and freezers and office equipment plug loads).

• The portion of the energy that a piece of non-seasonal equipment uses is equal to its demand
divided by the sum of all non-seasonal equipment demands using that same utility

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 10


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

(gas/electric) whose annual loads are have NOT known/previously assumed, multiplied by
100% subtracted by the sum of all seasonal proportions for the corresponding utility

• The overall energy use is equal to the calculated portion of energy consumption for a piece of
equipment multiplied by the annual average for the corresponding utility.

Energy Conservation Recommendations

Program Thermostats

• Assumptions:
• 3% reduction in cooling energy consumption for every Fahrenheit degree the thermostat is
increased.

• Programmable thermostats have historically been set to 72 degrees Fahrenheit in the


summer and 68 degrees Fahrenheit in the winter. Heating and cooling are off after hours.

• The new thermostat program will involve increasing the cooling set point by 6 degrees
Fahrenheit and the setback by 13 degrees.

• The new thermostat program will involve reducing the heating set point by 1 degrees
Fahrenheit.

• Calculation:
8 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 16 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 14 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = �� × 6 × 3%� + � × 13 × 3%�� × 350 𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺 + � × 1 × 3%�
24 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 24 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 24 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
× 3866 𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺
BAS Conversion

• Assumptions:
• 15% reduction in heating, cooling ventilation energy consumption (less savings already
achieved via the programmable thermostats);

• Additional cooling savings cannot be achieved as the programmable thermostat retrofit


reduces the cooling load by more that 15%

• The thermostat program is already in place and performing as calculated.

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 15%
× �𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 × (1 − 𝑇𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 %) + 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑔𝑔𝑦𝑦
× (1 − 𝑇𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 %) + 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
× (1 − 𝑇𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 %)�

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 10


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

RTU Replacement

• Assumptions:
• New RTU will have a thermal efficiency of 91% and an EER of 18.

• The BAS is already in place and reducing the energy from the furnaces by 15%.

• The unit will be resized to achieve the existing output, given a 91% efficiency and 18 EER.

• Calculation:
𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻13 𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = (91% − 80%) × (1241.44 𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺 ∗ 85%) × 1.11
Boiler Replacement

• Assumptions:
• Existing boiler has an efficiency of 80%.

• New boiler will have an efficiency of 98%.

• The energy input of the new boiler will be lower in relation to the improved efficiency (will
preserving the existing output).

• The BAS is already in place and reducing the energy from the boiler by 15%.

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × (1 − 15%𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵 ) × (𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 − 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸. 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 ) ×
𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝑢𝑢𝑡𝑡𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁
�1 + �
𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

Unit Heaters Replacement

• Assumptions:
• Existing unit heater has an efficiency of 83%.

• New unit heaters will have an efficiency of 95%.

• The energy input of the new unit heaters will be 13% lower (will preserving the existing
output).

• The BAS is already in place and reducing the energy from the unit heaters by 15%.

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × (1 − 15%𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵 ) × (𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 − 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸. 𝑒𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 ) ×
𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁
�1 + �
𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 10


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

Ice Plant Heat Recovery

• Assumptions:
• The heat recovery potential is equal to the refrigeration capacity of the ice plant

• The refrigeration capacity of the ice plant is 88kW

• The heat can be recovered 24/7 for 32 Weeks a year.

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 × (1 − .15%) × 1792ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟

Drain Heat Recovery Retrofit

• Assumptions:
• Retrofit will improve reduce DHW heating demand by 57%

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 57% × 1,091 𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺
DHW Heater Replacement

• Assumptions:
• Two Existing DHW heaters have an efficiency of 98%.

• Two Existing DHW heaters have an efficiency of 80%.

• New DHW heaters will have an efficiency of 96%.

• Tankless DHW heaters will reduce standby heat loss by 14%.

• Two Existing DHW heaters will be eligible for a size reduction of 17% if efficiency is raised
from 80 to 98%.

• The Drain Heat Recovery Retrofit is already in place and reducing the energy from the unit
heaters by 57%.

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × (1 − 57%𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵 ) × (𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 − 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸. 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 ) ×
𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑐𝑐𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁
�1 + � × (1 + 14%)
𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

Brine Pump VFD Installation

• Assumptions:
• The pumps cycling the existing pumps bumps to simulate a two-speed brine pump system,

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 10


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

• Installing a VFD will reduce the Brine pump power required by 30% and will reduce overall
energy consumption by 35%.

• The reduction in Brine pump power will reduce the compressor energy consumption by 5%

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = (𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × 35%) + (𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑢𝑢𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × 5%)

Brine Pump Program Temperature Setbacks

• Assumptions:
• The Brine pump will use 8% less energy

• The VFD is already installed on the Brine Pump and is saving 35%.

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × (1 − 35%) × 8%

Ice Resurfacer Replacement

• Assumptions:
• Replacement will improve the efficiency of the ice resurfacer by 21%

• Current Ice resurfacer consumes 39 GJ a year.

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 21% × 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶
Domestic Water Systems

• Assumptions:
• Half of employees are male, and half are female.

• There are 6.5 Fulltime equivalent employees year-round.

• There is an average of 453 visitors a day, every day

• Lavatory faucets are used 3 times a day for 15 seconds for each employee.

• Toilets without posted flowrates use 6.0 LPF.

• Each female employee uses the toilet 3 times in an 8 hour workday.

• Each male employee uses the toilet .5 times in an 8 hour workday.

• Each visitor uses the toilet 0.5 times a day.

• Each male employee uses the urinal 2.5 times in an 8 hour workday.

• Kitchen Faucets without posted flowrates use 8.3 LPM.

• Kitchen faucets are used for 15 seconds a day by each employee.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 10


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II September 30, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

• Custodial sinks without posted flowrates use 8.3 LPM.

• Shower heads with aerators without posted flowrates use 9.6 LPM.

• Each shower head is used for 6 minutes a day, 7 times a day, 7 days a week, 32 weeks a
year.

Building Envelope Heat Loss

• Calculation:
24ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻 (𝑊𝑊) = 𝑈𝑈 × 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 × 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻 ×
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 10


FINAL
Energy Audit -
ASHRAE Level II
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario

Prepared for:

Town of Erin
5684 Trafalgar Rd.
Hillsburgh, ON N0B 1Z0

Attention: Ursula D’Angelo


Director of Finance

October 8, 2019

Pinchin File: 241444

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd.


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Issued to: Town of Erin


Contact: Ursula D’Angelo
Director of Finance
Issued on: October 8, 2019
Pinchin File: 241444
Issuing Office: Mississauga, ON
Primary Pinchin Contact: Melissa Anastacio, P.Eng., LEED AP
905.363.1434
manastacio@pinchin.com

Author: Ms. Carleen Lawson, MBSc, BAS


Project Technologist
289.971.7431
clawson@pinchin.com

Reviewer: Mr. Paul Frasie, M.Eng., P.Eng., LEED Green Associate


Senior Project Manager
905.363.1457
pfrasie@pinchin.com

Reviewer: Mr. Mark Cherry, P.Eng.


Operations Manager, Building Science and Sustainability
204.452.0983, ext 2249
mcherry@pinchin.com

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page i


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Pinchin Ltd. (Pinchin) was retained by Town of Erin to conduct an energy audit of the Hillsburgh
Community Centre located at 95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario.

The purpose of the energy audits is to identify how energy is used on site and how to maximize available
funds across the best energy conservation measures. To achieve the greatest energy reduction, the
Client would like to implement a series of energy conservation measures (ECMs).

This report provides an analysis of historical energy data at the Town of Erin building located at 95 Main
St, Hillsburgh, Ontario, to determine the effects of weather, billing abnormalities and analyze current
energy and water systems. Energy consumption data is summarized by end use such as lighting, heating,
cooling, ventilation and plug loads. Energy conservation measures for the subject building are
summarized based on the information gathered during Pinchin’s facility audit and information provided by
the client.

Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Est.


Potential Est.
Electrical Gas Water GHG Cost Est. Grant
Recommendation Savings Payback
Savings Savings Savings Savings Savings Cost ($) Incentive
(%) (Yrs.)
(GJ) (GJ) (m3) (Kg) ($) ($)
Programmable
4.1 Thermostats 21.5 1,117 628 1% 3,000 0 5
(576 m3)
Installation
4.2 BAS Installation 4.2 82.1 4,597 1,488 4% 109,000 1,366 72
(1,175 kWh) (2,206 m3)

4.3 RTU Replacement 1.2 4,741 382 0% 10,000 0 26


(328 kWh)
Furnace -
4.3 Condensing 91.1 4,741 457 4% 20,000 400 43
(2,447 m3)
Replacement
Drain Heat 40.7
4.4 2,117 204 2% 6,500 0 32
Recovery Retrofit (1,093 m3)
DHW Heaters -
4.5 Tankless 56.5 2,940 283 3% 22,000 2,000 71
(1,518 m3)
Replacement
Ice plant - Heat 179 229.9
4.6 25,682 13,003 19% 40,000 5,899 3
Recovery (8,509 kWh) (6,173 m3)

Brine Pump VFD 80.2


5.1 (22,288 6,152 2,742 4% 20,000 2,229 6
Installation kWh)
Brine Pump -
Program 30.6
5.2 2,349 1,093 1% 5,000 0 5
Temperature (8,509 kWh)
Setbacks
Ice Resurfacer 8.1
5.3 (8,509 6 446 0% 100,000 0 224
Replacement LPG #)

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page ii


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Domestic Water 0.11


6.1 124 6 635 0% 4,675 3 7
Fixture Retrofits (3 m3)
40.9
7.1 Lighting Retrofit (11,372 3,139 1,270 2% 23,802 3,025 16
kWh)
Motion Controlled 7.5
7.2 575 233 0% 660 0 3
Light Switches (2,084 kWh)

Supplement Wall 141.3 181.4


8.1 (39,247 20,268 5,292 15% 77,500 1,300 14
Insulation (4871 m3)
kWh)

Pinchin’s proposed energy conservation measures aim to reduce the building’s EUI by approximately
56%, resulting in an EUI of 0.43 GJ/m2/yr. The annual energy cost and maintenance savings associated
with achieving the Post-Retrofit EUI is approximately $36,750.

The following table is a summary of the opportunity for power generation at the Hillsburgh Community
Centre.

Annual Annual Est.


Annual Est.
Electrical GHG Est. Grant
Recommendation Earnings Payback
Generation Savings Cost ($) Incentive
($) (Yrs.)
(GJ) (Kg) ($)
9.1 PV Array Installation 1,079 82,730 33,476 75,000 0 2

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page iii


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
Facility Overview................................................................................................................... 1
Building Operations .............................................................................................................. 2
1.2.1 Recent Building Upgrades and Contemplated Energy Conservation Measures ......... 2
1.2.2 Typical Energy Consumption Breakdown .................................................................... 3
HVAC Equipment ................................................................................................................. 3
Pumps and Motors................................................................................................................ 6
Water Conservation .............................................................................................................. 7
Lighting ................................................................................................................................. 8
Building Envelope ................................................................................................................. 9
2.0 UTILITY INFORMATION................................................................................................................ 10
Annual Utility Cost Breakdown ........................................................................................... 11
Energy Consumption .......................................................................................................... 12
2.2.1 Energy Consumption Summary ................................................................................. 12
2.2.2 Energy Consumption Analysis ................................................................................... 13
Water Consumption ............................................................................................................ 16
2.3.1 Water Consumption Summary ................................................................................... 16
2.3.2 Seasonal Water Consumption Analysis ..................................................................... 17
3.0 ENERGY CONSUMPTION BENCHMARKING ............................................................................. 19
Introduction to Energy Use Intensity .................................................................................. 19
Energy Use Intensity Analysis ............................................................................................ 19
Actual Energy Use Breakdown ........................................................................................... 20
4.0 HVAC RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................... 21
Programmable Thermostats Installation ............................................................................. 22
Install a Digital BAS (Building Automation System) ........................................................... 23
RTU – Replacement ........................................................................................................... 24
Furnace - Replacement ...................................................................................................... 25
Drain Heat Recovery Retrofit.............................................................................................. 26
DHW Heater Replacement ................................................................................................. 26
Ice Plant Heat Recovery ..................................................................................................... 27
Installation of Sub-Meters at Major HVAC Equipment. ...................................................... 27
5.0 PUMPS AND MOTORS RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................... 27
Installation of Variable Flow Drive (VFDs) on Pumps and Variable Speed Drives (VSDs)
Fan Motors 28
5.1.1 Brine Pump ................................................................................................................. 28
5.1.2 Remaining pumps and motors ................................................................................... 29
Brine Temperature Set Backs ............................................................................................ 29
Ice Resurfacer - Replacement ............................................................................................ 30
Demand Control Ventilation................................................................................................ 30
6.0 WATER CONSERVATION ............................................................................................................ 31
Domestic Systems .............................................................................................................. 31
6.1.1 High Efficiency Toilets ................................................................................................ 31
6.1.2 High Efficiency Urinals................................................................................................ 31
6.1.3 High Efficiency Bathroom Faucets ............................................................................. 31

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page iv


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

6.1.4 High Efficiency Kitchen Faucets ................................................................................. 32


6.1.5 High Efficiency Shower Heads ................................................................................... 32
Ice Resurfacer .................................................................................................................... 32
7.0 LIGHTING RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................ 33
Light Fixture Retrofit ........................................................................................................... 33
Motion Controlled Light Switch Installation ......................................................................... 37
8.0 BUILDING ENVELOPE RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 37
Supplemental Wall Insulation ............................................................................................. 37
Continued Inspections ........................................................................................................ 38
9.0 POWER GENERATION RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................... 39
10.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 40
11.0 DISCARDED CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................ 41
Unit Heater Replacement ................................................................................................... 41
Supplemental Roof Insulation............................................................................................. 41
12.0 NON-FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS.......................................................................................... 42
13.0 RECOMMENDED ITEMS FOR ASHRAE LEVEL III (CAPITAL GRADE) ENERGY AUDIT......... 42
14.0 TERMS AND LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................... 43

APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Utility Bill Data


APPENDIX II Photographs
APPENDIX III HVAC Equipment List
APPENDIX IV Ranking of Measures

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page v


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1: Building Characteristics ............................................................................................... 2


Table 1-2 HVAC Energy Conservation Recommendations at Hillsburgh Community Centre ...... 6
Table 1-3 Pumps and Motors Energy Conservation Recommendations at Hillsburgh Community
Centre ........................................................................................................................................... 7
Table 1-4: Domestic Water Systems Inventory for Hillsburgh Community Centre........................ 7
Table 1-5: Domestic Water Systems Inventory for Hillsburgh Community Centre Continued ...... 7
Table 1-6 Water Conservation Recommendations at Hillsburgh Community Centre ................... 8
Table 1-7 Lighting Recommendations at Hillsburgh Community Centre ...................................... 9
Table 1-8 Building Envelope Recommendations at Hillsburgh Community Centre .................... 10
Table 3-1 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Hillsburgh Community Centre ................................. 21
Table 4-1 Major HVAC Equipment in Use at Hillsburgh Community Centre............................... 22
Table 4-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with the installation of programmable at
Hillsburgh Community Centre ..................................................................................................... 23
Table 4-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with pneumatic to DDC conversion at the
Hillsburgh Community Centre ..................................................................................................... 23
Table 4-4 Summary of costs and savings associated with RTU replacement at the Hillsburgh
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 25
Table 4-5 Summary of costs and savings associated with Furnace Replacement at the
Hillsburgh Community Centre ..................................................................................................... 25
Table 4-6 Summary of costs and savings associated with Drain Heat Recovery retrofit at the
Hillsburgh Community Centre ..................................................................................................... 26
Table 4-7 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Hillsburgh
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 26
Table 4-8 Summary of costs and savings associated with Ice Plant heat recovery at the
Hillsburgh Community Centre ..................................................................................................... 27
Table 5-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with Brine Pump VFD Installation at the
Hillsburgh Community Centre ..................................................................................................... 29
Table 5-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with Brine Temperature Set Backs at the
Hillsburgh Community Centre ..................................................................................................... 30
Table 5-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Hillsburgh
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 30
Table 6-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with plumbing fixture retrofit at the
Hillsburgh Community Centre ..................................................................................................... 32
Table 7-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with lighting retrofit at Hillsburgh
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 34

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page vi


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 7-2 Summary of Existing and Proposed Lighting Fixtures on Site .................................... 35
Table 8-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with supplemental wall insulation at
Hillsburgh Community Centre ..................................................................................................... 38
Table 9-1 Summary of costs and earnings associated with a PV Array Installation at Hillsburgh
Community Centre ...................................................................................................................... 39
Table 11-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with Unit Heater Replacement at the
Hillsburgh Community Centre ..................................................................................................... 41
Table 11-2: Summary of Costs and Savings associated with Supplemental Attic Insulation at
Hillsburgh Community Centre ..................................................................................................... 42

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Typical Energy Breakdown in an Ice Rink ................................................................... 3


Figure 1-3 Estimated Breakdown of Annual Lighting Energy Consumption ................................. 9
Figure 2-1 Breakdown of Average Annual Utility Costs .............................................................. 12
Figure 2-2: Annual Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Hillsburgh Community
Centre ......................................................................................................................................... 12
Figure 2-3: Monthly Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Hillsburgh Community
Centre ......................................................................................................................................... 13
Figure 2-4 Electricity and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis ......................................... 14
Figure 2-5: Electricity and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis ........................................ 14
Figure 2-6: Natural Gas and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis .................................... 14
Figure 2-7: Natural Gas and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis..................................... 15
Figure 2-8: Electricity Consumption and Cooling Degree Days .................................................. 16
Figure 2-9: Summary of Annual Water Data from 2017 to 2018 of Hillsburgh Community Centre
.................................................................................................................................................... 16
Figure 2-10: Monthly Water Consumption (m3) of Hillsburgh Community Centre ....................... 17
Figure 2-11: Water consumption comparison of Hillsburgh Community Centre plotted against
heating and cooling degree-days between 2017 and 2018 ........................................................ 18
Figure 2-12: Water Consumption and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis ...................... 19
Figure 3-1 EUI Comparison between Hillsburgh Community Centre and ASHRAE EUI Target. 20
Figure 3-2 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Hillsburgh Community Centre ................................ 21
Figure 7-1 Energy consumption comparison of existing and proposed lighting. ......................... 33

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page vii


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Pinchin Ltd. (Pinchin) was retained by Ursula D’Angelo, Director of Finance at Town of Erin to conduct an
ASHRAE Level II Energy Audit of Hillsburgh Community Centre located at 95 Main St, Hillsburgh,
Ontario.

The purpose of the energy audit to is identify how energy is used on site and how to maximize available
funds across the best energy conservation measures. To achieve the greatest energy reduction, the
Client would like to implement a series of energy conservation measures (ECMs).

The audit was conducted by Pinchin assessors, Carleen Lawson and Raven Cote, on July 11th at which
time Pinchin interviewed and was accompanied by the Building Manager, hereinafter refer to as the “Site
Representative”.

Cost estimates provided in this report are preliminary Class “D” and provided only as an indication of the
order of magnitude of the remedial work. These values have been arrived at by determining a
representative quantity from the visual observations made at the time of our Site visit and by applying
current market value unit costs to such quantities and or a reasonable lump sum allowance for the work.
More precise cost estimates would require more detailed investigation to define the scope of work. They
are not intended to warrant that the final costs will not exceed these amounts or that all costs are
covered. The estimates assume the work is performed at one time and do not include costs for potential
de-mobilization and re-mobilization if repairs/replacement are spread out over the term of analysis.

All costs are identified in 2019 Canadian Dollars, including a 20% contingency fee to cover unforeseen
costs. Repair/replacement cost estimates are accurate to +/- 50%.

All cost estimates assume that regular annual maintenance and repairs will be performed to all building
elements at the facility. No cost allowance is carried for this regular maintenance.

The cost estimates provided in this report are based on costs of past repairs at similar buildings, recent
costing data such as “RS Means” and “Hanscomb’s Yardsticks for Costing”, or Pinchin’s professional
judgment.

Energy Savings and Demand Savings provided in this report are estimated to an accuracy of +/- 30%

This report satisfies all requirements an ASHRAE Level II energy Audit as stated by the
ANSI/ASHRAE/ACCA Standard 211-2018 and ASHRAE Standard 100-2015 -- Energy Efficiency in
Existing Buildings.

Facility Overview

Table 1-1 Provides a Summary of the Building Use and Construction.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 1-1: Building Characteristics

Building Age 69 years (Construction circa 1950s);


Ownership Status Owned by Town of Erin

Utility Data Electricity – Hydro One, Gas – Enbridge, Water – Town of Erin
Gross Floor Area 2,212.5 m2 (23,815 ft2)
Building Type Recreation (Ice Arena)
Occupied Hours ~ 70 hours/week (September to April)
Regular Occupancy ~2.5 fulltime equivalent staff, ~290 daily visitors (September to April)
Roof System Sloped metal and single-ply membrane
Wall System Brick masonry and metal cladding
Windows N/A

Building Operations

A solid understanding of building operations and occupancy allows building owners to assess the varying
power and ventilation loads and improve the efficiency of energy using systems. The Site Building is
comprised of 2,212.5 m2 of recreation space. The Site Building provides an ice rink and banquet hall.

The ice rink is open from September to March, and the community centre continues to operate in April.
Due to the fluctuation in program attendance, the average number of occupants is difficult to accurately
specify. The Site Representative informed Pinchin that there are 2.5 full-time equivalent staff who
primarily work from 3:00pm to 11pm, during the week and from 7:00am to 10:00pm on the weekend for
September to March and from 8:00am to 4:00pm for April. In addition, the Site Representative reported
that there are on average 300 visitors a day during the skating season. In the summer the building is used
occasionally for community events, with approximately 2 events a year with 150 visitors each. The snack
bar is assumed to be used 20 hours a week during the skating season, while the fridges and coolers
operate all year.

1.2.1 Recent Building Upgrades and Contemplated Energy Conservation Measures

This section details the recent upgrades and changes to the building as well as any ECMs contemplated
by the building mangers:

• The evaporative condenser for the ice plant was replaced in 2016.

• One RTU on the upper roof level was replaced in 2017.

• The halogen lighting in the arena was upgraded to LED in 2017.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

• The DHW tank serving the community centre was replaced in May 2019.

• The hot water heater serving the ice resurfacer failed in June 2019. The Building Manager was
quoted $11,000 for the replacement of the DHW heater and the adjacent storage tank.

• A building-wide upgrade to LED lighting has been contemplated.

1.2.2 Typical Energy Consumption Breakdown

A study of the energy consumption breakdown within similar buildings is a key first step in determining
opportunities for energy reduction (refer to Figure 1-1). Pinchin has provided a breakdown of a typical ice
rink energy use. Energy in an ice rink is dominantly used by the space heating, the ice plant, domestic
hot water (DHW) and lighting systems. Recommended retrofits will be focused on these areas to best
improve the Site’s overall energy efficiency and lower utility costs.

Figure 1-1 Typical Energy Breakdown in an Ice Rink

Plug load Ventilation


3% 2%

Domestic Hot Water Lighting


5% 9%

Ice Plant
20% Heating
61%

HVAC Equipment

The primary HVAC equipment in use at Hillsburgh Community Centre is described in the following
section. A full list of the HVAC equipment is provided in Appendix III.

Heating, cooling and ventilation of the Site Building are provided by two (2) gas fired furnaces and two (2)
electric roof top cooling units (RTUs) with associated supply and exhaust fans as well as one (1) gas-fired
unit heater (UH) and two (2) electric force flow heaters. Additional heating in the referee box is supplied

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 3 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

by plug in, electric space heaters. Additional ventilation is provided by washroom exhaust fans and the
kitchen hood fan.

The two (2) furnaces in service are mid-efficiency Brock Engineering models which consist of a gas
furnace for heating and a blower motor section that blows the air into the building through the ducts. Air
distribution is conducted via duct diffusers, which were observed to be damaged in the change rooms.
The furnaces heat the original, community centre portion of the building.

The two (2) rooftop cooling units are located on the roof of the Site Building, above the 2nd floor
community centre area and provide cooling for the upstairs event space. The Carrier “50TC” model was
manufactured in 2017 and has a cooling capacity of 24.3kW with an Energy Efficiency ratio of 11.2. The
unit has two accessory electric heaters (and a power exhaust) installed with 17kW and 34kW heating
capacities.

The name plate was missing on the older, Carrier “Weathermaster” model. Based on partial data
collected, Pinchin assumed for the energy model that the unit has a cooling capacity of 20 Tons with a
SEER of 9.6. Refrigerant for the older unit is R-22.

One (1) suspended gas fired unit heater serves the ice resurfacer room, one (1) electric force flow heater
(FFH) serves the sports office, one (1) electric FFH serves the referee box and one (2) electric FFH
serves the ice resurfacer room. The suspended gas fired unit heater has a heating capacity of 50,000
Btuh and was manufactured in 1994; the unit appears to be approaching the end of its PUL. The ages
and capacities of the unit heaters could not be determined from available unit data. They are assumed to
be original to the additions and have heating capacities ranging from 2-3kW.

The two (2) dehumidification units are located directly below the roof in the arena area. The units are
installed on structural mezzanines located at the Northeast and Southeast corners of the arena and
discharging directly into the arena space. The units are controlled by their own thermostats and appear to
be original to the building. The dehumidifying equipment is utilizing R-22 refrigerant.

R-22 is part of a group of refrigerants that are due to be phased out as part of the Montreal Protocol on
Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. Production of R-22 refrigerant in use at this facility is on track
for a 99.5% phase out by 2020, and a 100% phase out by 2030. This means R-22 refrigerant is becoming
more difficult to find, more expensive to purchase, and equipment which operates on R-22 will become
more difficult to repair or replace as manufacturers move to equipment using newer refrigerants.

The individual HVAC equipment is controlled by individual wall mounted thermostats. Programmable
thermostats are recommended as they increase the ease for ECMs, such as temperature setbacks, to be
implemented within the facility. Pinchin recommends that the ice plant for the arena be connected to a
BAS. The conversion to a BAS system would improve efficiency of building operations, improve occupant

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 4 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

comfort and reduce energy consumption and utility costs. This recommendation is discussed further in
Section 4 of the report.

The Site Representative reported that the heating set point is 21 °C (70 °F) and the heating set back is 18
°C (70 °F). The cooling is only turned on during summer events, which occur only twice on average.
Reduced setpoints would reduce energy consumption and utility costs. This suggested upgrade is
discussed further in Section 4 of the report.

Domestic hot water production and storage within the facility is a year-round operation but occurs
primarily between September and April. Domestic hot water production is accomplished with one (1)
Bradford White gas-fired domestic hot water heater. Auxiliary equipment to the gas fired domestic hot
water heater includes one re-circulation pump. A hot water heater with four storage tanks serves the ice
resurfacer.

The recommended upgrades are discussed further in Section 4.0 of the report.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 5 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 1-2 HVAC Energy Conservation Recommendations at Hillsburgh Community Centre

Equipment Type Issue Recommendation Section

Programmable No programmable Install programmable


4.1
Thermostats thermostats on site. thermostats.

HVAC is controlled
BAS by standalone Upgrade to BAS system. 4.2
thermostats.

Existing units are Replace with high efficiency


RTUs 4.3
mid-efficiency. units

Replace with high efficiency,


Existing units are
Furnace condensing furnaces with 4.4
mid-efficiency.
variable air speed blower.

Heat from DHW is


Recover drain heat waste to
Shower Drains lost through the 4.5
preheat DHW.
shower drains.

Existing units are


Replace with a high efficiency
HW Heaters tank style and are 4.6
tankless HW heaters.
not high efficiency

Waste heat from ice Recover waster heat to preheat


Ice Plant rink is released fresh supply air and DHW or 4.7
outside. melt snow pit contents.

Meters No sub-meters are Install sub-meters. 4.8


present.

Pumps and Motors

The pumps in use at Hillsburgh Community Centre include the brine pumps, jacket pump, evaporative
condenser pump and spray pump, DHW re-circulation pump, sump pump and those that are associated
with the fire safety systems. The motors in use at Hillsburgh Community Centre consist of the ice plant
compressor motors, and exhaust fan motors. The fans may be operated by the user or when the heating
and cooling modes are engaged by the thermostat.

Ventilation is a key contributor to the Site building’s base load demand, base power demand and annual
average power factor levels. Power factor is important to consider when analysing the impact of inductive
loads on the Site Building’s annual utility costs; Power factor tends to decrease as inductive loads
increase. In addition, power demand must be considered as it is correlated to electrical equipment use.
Improvements to motor efficiency will lead to a reduction in energy consumption. Table 1-3 lists Pinchin’s
pumps and motor energy conservation recommendations at Hillsburgh Community Centre.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 6 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 1-3 Pumps and Motors Energy Conservation Recommendations at Hillsburgh Community
Centre
Equipment Type Issue Recommendation Section

No brine
Program brine temperature
Brine Pump temperature setback 5.1.1
setbacks for unoccupied hours.
program in place.

Ice Plant Pumps No VFD present. Install VFDs on Pumps. 5.1.2

No capacitator Install capacitator to improve


Compressor Motors 5.2
observed. the power factor of the motor.

Higher efficiency
models are
Ice Resurfacer available, and the Upgrade the Ice Resurfacer to a
5.3
Replacement existing unit is high efficiency model.
approaching the end
of its PUL.

No Demand Control
Ventilation Ventilation (DCV) in Install CO2 sensor for DCV 5.4
place.

Water Conservation

The water-using systems in use at Hillsburgh Community Centre consist of the following: Ice resurfacer,
irrigation sprinklers, kitchen faucets, lavatory faucets, toilet, urinals and shower heads. It should be noted
that Hillsburgh Community Centre does not possess a water meter. Table 1-4 and Table 1-5 quantify the
domestic water fixtures in place:

Table 1-4: Domestic Water Systems Inventory for Hillsburgh Community Centre

Lavatory Shower
Area Toilet LPF Urinal LPF LPM LPM
Faucet Head

Site Building 6 6 7 3.8 5 5.7 5 9.5

Table 1-5: Domestic Water Systems Inventory for Hillsburgh Community Centre Continued

Area Kitchen Faucet LPM Custodial Sink LPM

Site Building 3 8.3 1 8.3

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 7 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Conventional faucets, toilets and urinals are found throughout the Site building. Pinchin recommends the
conventional should be replaced with ultra-low flow alternatives. These recommendations are discussed
in further detail in Section 6.0 of the report.

Water conserving measures are expected to reduce water costs and wear and tear within water
consuming systems. Table 1-8 lists Pinchin’s water conservation recommendations at Hillsburgh
Community Centre.

Table 1-6 Water Conservation Recommendations at Hillsburgh Community Centre

Equipment
Issue Recommendation Section
Type

The inefficient fixtures and


Conventional fixtures were
Domestic faucets should be replaced with 6.1
found.
ultra-low flow alternatives.

Install a main water meter and


There are no water meters
Meters sub-meters and monitor water 6.2
installed.
consumption.

Continue conducting routine


Continued Insufficient maintenance can
inspections and ongoing 6.3
Maintenance lead to unidentified issues.
maintenance.

Install a gauge to ensure only the


Ice resurfacer may be being over
Ice Resurfacer necessary amount of hot water is 6.4
supplied with hot water
loaded into the ice resurfacer.

Lighting

The lighting systems within Hillsburgh Community Centre consists of LED lighting over the ice arena and
fluorescent linear T12s and incandescent bulbs throughout the rest of the building with HPS wall packs
and Halogens lamps located at the exterior. The majority of the lighting system is controlled manually. A
very limited number of fixtures have been placed on motion sensors which deactivate the light if there is
no activity near them.

The fluorescent and metal halide fixtures currently in use are inefficient and it is recommended that they
are replaced with LED alternatives. A lighting upgrade would reduce energy consumption and utility costs.
These upgrades are discussed further in Section 7 of the report. Refer to Figure 1-3 and Table 1-7.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 8 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 1-2 Estimated Breakdown of Annual Lighting Energy Consumption

Lighting
3%

Other
97%

Table 1-7 Lighting Recommendations at Hillsburgh Community Centre

Lighting
Issue Recommendation Section
Type

Fluorescent,
Fluorescent, incandescent,
Incandescent,
halogen and HPS lighting LED lighting retrofit. 7.1
Halogen and fixtures are significantly less
efficient than LEDs.
HPS

Install occupancy sensors to


Controls The majority of lighting on 7.2
site is switch controlled. control the lighting.

Building Envelope

This building envelope was reviewed including the exterior cladding and all entrances and exits. These
building systems are subject to air and heat leakage as well as moisture infiltration. Pinchin recommends
ongoing maintenance to ensure the building envelope is in good condition.

The wall system which consists of brick masonry at the Community Centre and at the lower portion of the
arena, while the remaining wall system of the arena consists of metal cladding. According to information
provided by the Site Representative, full brick masonry replacement of the original Community Centre
portion of the Site Building was performed circa the 1990s. The remaining exterior brick masonry of the

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 9 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Site Building on the arena addition is original to arena construction (circa 1960s) and appeared to be in
generally poor to fair condition, with failed and cracked mortar joints, and effloresce observed. The metal
cladding was observed to generally be in good condition with only minor deficiencies noted at wall
penetrations. Pinchin recommends repointing of the mortar and resealing penetrations across the entire
wall system on all elevations.

The main and secondary entrance doors of the Site Building consist IG unit prefinished metal doors within
prefinished metal frames. The secondary exit doors consist of hollow metal doors within metal frames. In
addition, there two (2) overhead doors. The doors are in good to fair condition, with minor impact damage
and damage to the weather-stripping. Pinchin recommends repair of the doors and weather-stripping to
ensure the heat transfer and air leakage are minimized at points of entry.

The roof was found to consist of a single-ply roofing system at the Community Centre, and sloped metal
roofing at the arena. The Community Centre roof was reportedly replaced in 2010 while the age of the
sloped metal roofing varies. The main arena sloped metal roof was reported to have a rubber coating
installed in 2008. The Site staff reported that the Community Centre roof leaks during heavy rainfall.
Moisture degrades the performance of the insulation resulting in a lower R value. Pinchin recommends
repair of the leaks at the Community Centre and when the roof requires replacement that supplemental
insulation is installed to improve the overall thermal performance. Regular maintenance and condition
reviews are recommended.

Refer to Table 1-8 for Building Envelope Recommendations.

Table 1-8 Building Envelope Recommendations at Hillsburgh Community Centre

Area Issue Recommendation Section

Walls The walls appear to contain minimal


insulation, resulting in unwanted Supplement Wall Insulation 8.1
heat transfer.

Continue conducting routine


Insufficient maintenance can lead to
Facility inspections and ongoing 8.2
unidentified issues.
maintenance.

2.0 UTILITY INFORMATION

The Erin Community Centre makes use of electricity, natural gas, propane and water. Monthly electricity
data consumption data from two meters were provided for November 2016 to May 2019; electricity cost
data was missing for September 2017 and December 2017 with respect to Meter # 2000 8797 3109. The
following assumptions were made for missing months:

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

• Pinchin assumed the September 2017 cost by multiplying the September 2018 cost
according to the ratio of September 2017 and September 2018 electricity consumption.

• Pinchin assumed the December 2017 cost by multiplying the December 2018 cost according
to the ratio of December 2017 and December 2017 electricity consumption.

Natural gas data was provided for the period of December 2016 to February 2019. Propane gas data was
provided for the period of January 2016 to April 2019. Water consumption data was provided for the
period of December 2016 to June 2019.

The date range for the various utilities do not align with each other. For an energy audit it is important to
be able to compare utility data for the same months; therefor, Pinchin will only analyze data from January
2017 to December 2018.

The utility consumption tables have been provided in Appendix I of the report.

Annual Utility Cost Breakdown

Analyzing annual costs of utilities is essential to prioritizing energy conservation measures. Figure 2-1
shows a breakdown of the average annual utility costs at Hillsburgh Community Centre. Electricity
consumption accounts for 82% ($49,802); natural gas accounts for 12% ($42,802); water accounts for 2%
($1,357); and propane accounts for 4% ($2,125) of annual utility costs. Electricity consumption is
assumed to be higher than natural gas as it is associated with a greater range of applications such as the
ice plant, lighting and plug loads. Also, only the original building is heated by natural gas. The combined
average annual cost for all utilities is $60,888. Pinchin has identified conservation measures for each
utility which will be discussed in later sections of the report.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 11 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-1 Breakdown of Average Annual Utility Costs


Water, $1,357 , Natural Gas,
Propane, $2,125 2% $7,604 , 12%
, 4%

Electricity,
$49,802 , 82%

Energy Consumption

2.2.1 Energy Consumption Summary

On-site energy is provided by electricity and natural gas for the Site Building and propane gas for the ice
resurfacer. Figure 2-2 provides a summary of annual electricity, natural gas, propane gas and total
energy consumption for the period from 2017 to 2018 for Hillsburgh Community Centre.

Figure 2-2: Annual Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Hillsburgh Community Centre

Average
Year

2018

2017

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000


Energy Consumption (GJ)
Total Natural Gas Electricity Propane

Figure 2-3 shows the monthly electricity and natural gas consumption, both converted to gigajoules to
allow for comparability, from January 2017 to December 2018. Natural gas is evidently the primary heat
source for the site, which can be seen by the annual peak in consumption from November to April.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 12 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-3: Monthly Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Hillsburgh Community
Centre

300

250
Energy Consumption (GJ)

200

150

100

50

0
Nov-17

Nov-18
Apr-17
May-17

Jul-17

Apr-18
May-18

Jul-18
Aug-17

Oct-17

Aug-18

Oct-18

Dec-18
Feb-17

Sep-17

Dec-17

Feb-18
Jan-17

Mar-17

Jun-17

Jan-18

Mar-18

Jun-18

Sep-18
Month
Electricity (GJ) Gas (GJ) Propane (GJ)

Electricity is used on Site for heating, cooling, the ice plant, ventilation, lighting and plug loads. The
average monthly consumption is 114 GJ. The seasonal averages were compared, with the fall having the
highest average with 202 GJ and spring having the lowest average with 41 GJ. The fall electricity
consumption was 5 times higher than the spring consumption. This suggests reflects the operation of the
ice plant during the fall winter and spring months which significantly increases the electricity consumption.

Natural gas is used on Site for space heating and domestic hot water heating. The average monthly
consumption is 744 GJ. The seasonal averages were compared, with the winter having the highest
average with 108.4 GJ and summer having the lowest average with 14.9 GJ. The winter natural gas
consumption was approximately 7.3 times higher than the summer consumption. This is as expected as
space heating and domestic hot water heating is required less during the summer season and the
building occupancy is concentrated between September and April.

2.2.2 Energy Consumption Analysis

To determine the effects of weather, two regression analyses were performed each for electricity
consumption and natural gas consumption in relation to heating degree days (HDD) and cooling degree
days (CDD). The climate data used was referenced from Historical Climate Data (2019). The first two
analyses looked at the relationship between electricity consumption, heating degree days and cooling
degree days. 1 The correlation between consumption and HDD/CDD is expressed as the displayed value

1
A heating degree day is defined as the number of degrees that a day's average temperature is below 18°. If the average outdoor
temperature is 5°C, the corresponding HDD would be 18°C - 5°C = 13°C.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 13 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

of R2. Essentially, this represents the amount of energy used per increase in heating/cooling degree day.
The R2 value does not in any way represent how efficiently the system operates. The results in Figure 2-4
and Figure 2-5 show a weak linear relationships between HDD and electricity consumption. A negetive
relationship is seen between electricity consumption and CDDs. The results indicate that the electricity
use is mostly consumed in the winter and is directed to base loads in the building, such as the ice plant.

Figure 2-4 Electricity and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis

Electricity Consumption Vs HDD


300.0
Electricity Consumption

y = 0.1369x + 67.6
250.0
R² = 0.1875
200.0
(GJ)

150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
HDD
Figure 2-5: Electricity and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis

Electricity Consumption Vs CDD


300.0
Electricity Consumption (GJ)

250.0

200.0
y = -1.3176x + 146.1
150.0
R² = 0.239
100.0

50.0

0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
CDD

The next two analyses looked at the relationship between natural gas consumption, heating degree days
and cooling degree days. On a scale of 0% to 100%, the relation between gas consumption and HDD in
Figure 2-6 can be expressed as 83%, which indicates a strong correlation. The results are
understandable as natural gas is used to for space heating and domestic hot water heating and the
building is generally only occupied between September and April. The results in Figure 2-7 show a
moderate negetive linear relationship between warm outdoor temperatures and natural gas consumption.
This is expected as natural gas use is reduced in the warmer weather.

Figure 2-6: Natural Gas and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 14 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

y = 0.1586x + 8.3401
Gas Consumption Vs HDD R² = 0.8373
160.0
Gas Consumption (GJ)

140.0
120.0
100.0
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
HDD

Figure 2-7: Natural Gas and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis

y = -1.0585x + 87.366
Gas Consumption Vs CDD R² = 0.5118
140.0
Gas Consumption (GJ)

120.0
100.0
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
CDD

The regression analysis for electricity and cooling degree days indicates that cooling is not a significant
source of electricity use and is small in comparison to the natural gas heating.

Figure 2-8 shows the relationship between electricity consumption, natural gas consumption, HDDs and
CDDs on a monthly basis. The graph illustrates a rise in energy consumption accompanying a rise in
HDDs.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 15 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-8: Electricity Consumption and Cooling Degree Days

300.0 900
800
Energy Consumption (GJ)

250.0
700
200.0 600

HDD & CDD


500
150.0
400
100.0 300
200
50.0
100
0.0 0

Nov-17

Nov-18
Apr-17
May-17

Jul-17

Apr-18
May-18

Jul-18
Aug-17

Oct-17

Aug-18

Oct-18
Feb-17

Feb-18

Sep-18

Dec-18
Jan-17

Mar-17

Jun-17

Sep-17

Dec-17
Jan-18

Mar-18

Jun-18
Months
Gas (GJ) Electricity (GJ) HDD CDD

Water Consumption

2.3.1 Water Consumption Summary

Figure 2-9 provides a summary of annual water data for the period from 2017 to 2018 for Hillsburgh
Community Centre, and Figure 2-10 provides a monthly summary for the Site building over the same time
period.

Figure 2-9: Summary of Annual Water Data from 2017 to 2018 of Hillsburgh Community Centre

2018 264
Year

2017 267

263 263 264 264 265 265 266 266 267 267 268
Water (m3)

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 16 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-10: Monthly Water Consumption (m3) of Hillsburgh Community Centre

500
450
400
Water Consumtion (m3)

350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month
2017 2018

Water is used on Site for boilers, domestic hot and cold water systems. The average monthly
consumption is 22 m3. The seasonal averages were compared, with the winter and spring seasons having
the lowest averages, 12 m3 and 6 m3 respectively. The summer and fall season averages were 31 m3 and
40 m3 respectively. The combined seasonal average for the summer and fall was 26% higher than the
winter and spring seasons.

2.3.2 Seasonal Water Consumption Analysis

The water consumption of the Site building, averaged between 2017 and 2018, was determined to be
2,952 m3. Figure 2-11 shows the correlation between water consumption, monthly Heating Degree Days
and monthly Cooling Degree Days measured in degrees Celsius (°C). The water usage increases during
the winter months, during the months of operation for the Site Building. Fluctuations of water consumption
could have been attributed to many factors: potential shifts in occupancy of the Site building, installation
of different fixtures, leaks, etc.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 17 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-11: Water consumption comparison of Hillsburgh Community Centre plotted against
heating and cooling degree-days between 2017 and 2018

45 900
40 800
Water Consumption (m3)

35 700
30 600

HDD & CDD


25 500
20 400
15 300
10 200
5 100
0 0
Nov-17

Nov-18
May-18
Apr-17
May-17

Jul-17
Aug-17

Oct-17

Apr-18

Jul-18
Aug-18

Oct-18

Dec-18
Feb-17

Sep-17

Dec-17

Feb-18
Jan-17

Mar-17

Jun-17

Jan-18

Mar-18

Jun-18

Sep-18
Months
Water Consumption (m3) HDD CDD

Figure 2-12 is a graphical representation of water consumption in relation to the increase in number of
cooling degree days (CDD), at the Site building. From this graph, a slight decrease in measured water
consumption can be seen to occur in relation to the measured number of cooling degree days. The
correlation between consumption and CDD is expressed as the displayed value of R2 in Figure 2-12.
Essentially, this represents the amount of water lost per increase in cooling degree day. The R2 value
does not in any way represent how efficiently the system operates. On a scale of 0% to 100%, the
relation between water consumption and CDD can be expressed as 14%, which indicates a poor
correlation. The correlation is expected as the building does not possess a cooling tower that is used in
the summer for space cooling.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 18 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-12: Water Consumption and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis

Water Consumption Vs CDD y = 0.1434x + 15.781


45
R² = 0.1393
40
Water Consumption (m3)

35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
CDD

3.0 ENERGY CONSUMPTION BENCHMARKING

Introduction to Energy Use Intensity

Energy use intensity (EUI) is a standard metric for energy consumption in buildings. The EUI is calculated
as a buildings annual energy consumption divided by its gross floor area. Normalizing the energy usage
for area allows for comparison between buildings and indicates relative performance.

The EUI is a limited metric as it is not normalized for other building characteristics such as climate zone.
To account for this limitation, the report will refer to ASHRAE Standard 100-2015 Energy target which
factors in building activity type, occupancy and climate zone. The targets “represent the 25th bottom (low
energy) percentile of energy use by each building category” 2. The ASHRAE energy target for Hillsburgh
Community Centre was determined to be 0.53 GJ/m2/year. Please refer to Appendix V for the
assumptions and calculations.

Energy Use Intensity Analysis

On average, from 2017 to 2018 Hillsburgh Community Centre consumed 1,367 GJ of electricity and 744
GJ of natural gas. It is assumed that the Site uses 39 GJ of propane gas. This amounts to approximately
2,150 GJ of annual energy consumption. The gross floor area is approximately 2,212.5 m2 (23,815 sf).
The resulting EUI is therefore 0.97 GJ/m2/yr. The calculated EUI is 1.8 times higher than the ASHRAE
energy target of 0.53 GJ/m2/yr.

2
ASHRAE Standard 100-2015

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 19 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

It is economically feasible to reduce the Site building’s energy consumption by improving the efficiency of
the building systems. Pinchin’s proposed energy conservation measures aim to reduce the building’s EUI
by approximately 55%, resulting in an EUI of 0.43 GJ/m2/yr. The annual energy cost and maintenance
savings associated with achieving the Post-Retrofit EUI is approximately $36,750.

Figure 3-1 EUI Comparison between Hillsburgh Community Centre and ASHRAE EUI Target

1.20
Energy Usage Intensity (GJ/m2/year)

1.00
0.97
0.80

0.60

0.53
0.40
0.43

0.20

-
Site Building (Current EUI) ASHRAE Target EUI Site Building (Post
Retrofits)

Pinchin recommends installing submeters at major energy systems so a further cost analysis can be
performed, and more savings identified.

Actual Energy Use Breakdown

Pinchin generated an energy use breakdown for Hillsburgh Community Centre with information collected
on site as well as previous building reports, equipment specifications and utility bill data provided by the
client. In the case of missing information, Pinchin made assumptions based on ice rink energy
consumption patterns. As seen in Figure 3-2, space heating accounts for 60% of energy consumed within
the facility and the ice rink accounts for 18%. Energy conservation measures are therefore concentrated
primarily on heating load reduction and refrigeration load reductions.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 20 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 3-2 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Hillsburgh Community Centre

Ice Plant, 790.6, 36.78% Heating, 801.4, 37.28%

Kitchen, 121.9, 5.67% Cooling, 2.8, 0.13%


Ventilation, 28.2, 1.31%
Plug Load, 31.6, 1.47%
Lighting, 66.8, 3.11% DHW, 306.3, 14.25%

Table 3-1 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Hillsburgh Community Centre

System Assumed Energy Consumption (GJ) Percentage

Heating 801.4 37.3%

Cooling 2.8 0.1%

Ventilation 28.2 1.3%

DHW 306.3 14.3%

Lighting 66.8 3.1%

Plug Load 31.6 1.5%

Kitchen 121.9 5.7%

Ice Plant 790.6 36.8%

4.0 HVAC RECOMMENDATIONS

The major HVAC equipment installed at Hillsburgh Community Centre is listed in Table 4-1. A description
of the existing HVAC system along with a detailed equipment list can be found in Appendix III of the
report.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 21 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 4-1 Major HVAC Equipment in Use at Hillsburgh Community Centre

Make Model # Heating Cooling Function Condition Remaining


PUL
Input Output Lifespan
Space 25 23
50TC-
Carrier 51 kW 24.3 kW Conditioning - Good
D08A2A1A0B0A0
RTU
Carrier Space Cooling 25 0
50DK501445 20 Tons* Poor
"Weathermaster" - RTU
250,000 Space Heating Fair to 30 1
Brock BHG 250
Btuh - Furnace Poor
250,000 Space Heating Fair to 30 1
Brock BHG 250
Btuh - Furnace Poor
50,000 Space Heating 15 0
Lennox LF24-50A-1 Poor
Btuh - UH
Space Heating 15 2
Unknown Unknown 1.5 kW* Fair
- FFH
Space Heating 15 2
Unknown Unknown 2 kW* Fair
- FFH
Fair to 20 1
Cimco Humicon MK VII 8.5 HP Dehumidifier
Poor
76,000 Domestic Hot 12 12
Bradford White RG2PV75H6N Good
Btuh Water Heating
250,000 Hot Water Poor - 12 0
John Woods JW70-250NED
Btuh Heating Failed
Cimco 100HP* Ice Plant Chiller Fair 25 5
Ice plant 18 5
1,617
BAC VC1-110 Evaporative Fair
MBH
Condenser
* Assumed Value

Programmable Thermostats Installation

The current HVAC system uses manually controlled thermostats. Pinchin was informed that the heating
set point is 21°C (70°F) and the heating set back is 18°C (70°F). The cooling is only turned on during
summer events, which occur only twice on average.

Replacing the standalone thermostats with programmable thermostats will allow for automatic occupied
and unoccupied scheduling, optimal occupied set points and optimal unoccupied setback temperatures.
In the winter, it is recommended to set the thermostat to 20°C (68°F) during operating hours and 18°C
(65°F) degrees after hours. Each degree Fahrenheit raised in the summer or lowered in the winter
represents up to 3% of energy savings. Based on our observations, Pinchin assumed that the Site
Building can reduce its set point during winter by 2°C (3.6°F) and its setback temperature by 3°C (5°F)
thereby leading to a 5% reduction in heating costs.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 22 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 4-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with the installation of programmable at
Hillsburgh Community Centre

Annual
Demand Annual System Incentives Simple
Energy
Implement Reduction Savings Cost Available Payback
Savings
(GJ) ($) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.004 38.2 628 3,000 N/A 5

Incentive Details N/A

*Note: The above assumptions are contingent on revised occupant behaviour as the occupant control the
thermostats. Assumes the cost of 6 new programmable thermostats.

Install a Digital BAS (Building Automation System)

As previously mentioned, ventilation, cooling and space heating within the facility area provided controlled
via a combination of digital and pneumatic thermostats.

The installation of a BAS will allow the Building manager to optimize the efficiency and accuracy of all wall
mounted thermostats, exhaust fans and the ice plant. It would be possible to achieve the desired space
conditions faster than before and reduce the amount of space heating, cooling and refrigeration required.
This measure is expected to provide energy savings and comfort benefits Table 4-3 outlines the
estimated savings associated with the pneumatic to digital BAS conversion at the Hillsburgh Community
Centre. This measure will reduce the HVAC energy consumption by about 15%.

See recommendation 5.2 for ice plant related savings.

Table 4-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with pneumatic to DDC conversion at the
Hillsburgh Community Centre

Demand Annual Energy Annual Incentives Simple


System
Implement Reduction Savings Savings Available Payback
Cost ($)
(GJ) (GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.010 87 1,488 109,000 1,366 72


IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh of
Incentive Details Annual Electricity Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs.
Enbridge “Commercial Custom Retrofit Program”: $0.15/m3 natural gas savings
Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

A digital BAS will provide long term benefits:

• More information for intelligent building management;

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 23 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

• Lower energy costs through better operating efficiency; and

• Lower maintenance cost through less need for calibration and service of the equipment.

The new BAS shall comprise, at minimum, the following components:

• Distributed Control Panels (DCP);

• Unitary Controllers (UC);

• Automation level Local Area Networks (LAN);

• Field instrumentation including intelligent sensors;

• Automatic Digital Control Valves;

• Actuators for automatic valves and motorised dampers (DDC Control);

• Software;

• Cable and containment; and

• All power supplies and conditioners, interlocking and control relays, equipment enclosures
and other components, materials and services required for a completed and fully operational
turnkey BAS installation meeting these specifications.

The BAS shall meet the following general criteria:

• Fully networked;

• Real time;

• Distributed processing; and

• No single point of failure.

The new BAS shall be configured to ensure reliability of systems operation and control of critical
functions/systems. Each contractor must verify on their own that the BAS is compatible with the
equipment to be controlled.

RTU – Replacement

The newer rooftop cooling unit model has a cooling Energy Efficiency Ratio (EER) of 11.2. The unit is
considered mid-efficiency and there are much more efficient units available today. Pinchin recommends
replacing the existing RTUs with an 18 SEER model to reduce energy consumption. This improvement in
efficiency means that the replacement unit can have a smaller capacity, further reducing energy use and
equipment costs. Refer to Table-4-4.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 24 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

As the nameplate was not available for the older RTU, its cooling capacity could not be verified and has
not been factor into the costs and savings. The model is assumed to have a 9.6 SEER; if upgraded to an
18 SEER model, the related energy consumption would be reduced by almost half.

Table 4-4 Summary of costs and savings associated with RTU replacement at the Hillsburgh
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

At end of PUL 0.05 1 382 10,000 N/A 65

Incentive Details N/A

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the building’s energy consumption.

Furnace - Replacement

The two (2) existing gas-fired furnaces has a 77% efficiency, which is low compared to the high efficiency
models that are now available.

High-efficiency condensing gas furnaces use a sealed, insulated combustion chamber, high efficiency
burners and multiple heat exchangers that significantly reduce waster heat from flue gases. The flue
gases are condensed which releases and recaptures useable heat.

This is a good opportunity to install a condensing furnace, which will have an efficiency of up to 96%. Due
to the large improvement in efficiency, the heating capacity of the unit can be reduced by without
interrupting the heating output. This measure will reduce the relevant gas consumption by about 21%.
Refer to Table-4-5.

Table 4-5 Summary of costs and savings associated with Furnace Replacement at the Hillsburgh
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

At end of PUL 0.20 91 457 20,000 400 43

Incentive Details Enbridge "Equipment Incentive Program": $200/unit

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the building’s energy consumption.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 25 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Drain Heat Recovery Retrofit

There does not appear to be a drain heat recovery system in place. Presently the DHW heat from
showers is lost down the drain. Pinchin recommends installing drain heat recovery units at each of the
shower drains. This system will preheat DHW supply water, requiring less gas energy to heat the water to
the desired temperature. Refer to Table 4-6.

Table 4-6 Summary of costs and savings associated with Drain Heat Recovery retrofit at the
Hillsburgh Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.05 41 204 6,500 N/A 32

Incentive Details N/A

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

DHW Heater Replacement

The existing DHW heaters have an 80% efficiency on average, which is considered medium efficiency.
Pinchin recommends that the units are replaced at the end of their PUL with 96% efficient condensing
tankless water heaters.

Storage type DHW heaters are subject to standby heat losses; an on-demand tankless water heater can
reduce energy consumption by an additional 14%. This improvement in efficiency mean that the
replacement unit can have a smaller capacity, further reducing energy use and equipment costs. Refer to
Table 4-7.

Table 4-7 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Hillsburgh
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

At end of PUL 0.06 57 283 22,000 2000 71

Incentive Details Enbridge "Equipment Incentive Program": $1,000/unit

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 26 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Ice Plant Heat Recovery

There does not appear to be a heat recovery program in place at the Site Building. Due to occupant
activities, lighting and space heating, the ice plant must continuously remove excess heat from the ice
slab in order to keep the ice at the desired temperature. Presently that heat is released outside using the
evaporative condenser, all while the building HVAC systems are generating heat for the interior. It would
reduce the heating load of the HVAC systems if the heat from the ice plant was recovered and used for
space heating, snow melting or DHW heating. This measure is expected to reduce heating energy. The
amount of heat an ice rink can potentially recover generally matches the refrigeration capacity of its ice
plant. Refer to Table 4-8.

Table 4-8 Summary of costs and savings associated with Ice Plant heat recovery at the Hillsburgh
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.27 409 13,003 40,000 5,900 3

IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh of


Incentive Annual Electricity Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs
Details
Enbridge “Commercial Custom Retrofit Program”: $0.15/m3 natural gas savings

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

Installation of Sub-Meters at Major HVAC Equipment.

Based on information gathered on Site, there are no sub meters installed on the major HVAC equipment.
It is highly recommended that the sub-meters be installed and recorded on a regular basis to track energy
consumption. Sub-metering will not save energy but will help identify energy consumption trends and
quantify opportunities for savings with improved accuracy.

5.0 PUMPS AND MOTORS RECOMMENDATIONS

The pumps and motors installed at Hillsburgh Community Centre is listed in Table 4-1. A description of
the existing pumps and motors along with a detailed equipment list can be found in Appendix III of the
report.

Table 5-1 Pumps and Motors in Use at Hillsburgh Community Centre

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 27 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Make Model # Heating Function Condition Remaining


PUL
Input Lifespan
Optim 15 HP Brine Pump #1 Fair 25 6

Armstrong 35T9A 10 HP Brine Pump #2 Fair 25 Unknown


Vilter Unknown 50 HP Compressor Good 25 Unknown
Motor
Vilter Unknown 50 HP Compressor Good 25 Unknown
Motor
Baldor JM35460-5 1/2 HP Water Purifier Good 15 4*
Pump
WEG JM002504DPW01 2 HP Evaporative Good 15 4
Condenser
Pump
BAC VC1-110 10 HP Evaporative Good 20 3
Condenser Fan
BAC VC1-110 1 HP Evaporative Fair 10 26*
Condenser
Spray Pump
Unknown Unknown 215 W* Pump - Fair 10 Unknown
Recirculation
Unknown Unknown 403 W* Exhaust fan #1 Fair 20 Unknown
Unknown Unknown 403 W Exhaust fan #2 Fair 20 Unknown
Olympia Unknown Unknown Motor - Ice Fair 15 17
Resurfacer
* Assumed Value

Installation of Variable Flow Drive (VFDs) on Pumps and Variable Speed Drives (VSDs) Fan
Motors

5.1.1 Brine Pump

There is presently no VFD on the brine pump. It is assumed to currently operate in full capacity
approximately 10-12 hours a day. When the Brine pump operates it introduces heat into the brine line,
thereby decreasing the efficiency of the ice plant and increasing the refrigeration load as the plant has to
work harder to remove that heat. It is recommended to install a VFD on the Brine pump motor to reduce
the motor’s operating speed and operating capacity in relation to the demand within the facility. This
reduced refrigeration load will also reduce the operating hours of the compressor, a dominant load within
the ice plant.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 28 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 5-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with Brine Pump VFD Installation at the
Hillsburgh Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

At end of PUL 0.03 67 2,519 20,000 2,229 6

Incentive IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh of
Details Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

5.1.2 Remaining pumps and motors

Installing a VFD to control the remaining pumps and motors would significantly reduce the amount of
energy consumed by reducing the motor’s operating speed and operating capacity in relation to the
demand within the facility.

The costs and savings have not been included for this measure as they could not be calculated with
confidence. VFDs reduce the operating power of the pumps to meet demand, as a result the components
experience less wear and tear, prolonging their PUL and reducing maintenance costs. This measure is
expected to yield some energy savings; no comfort savings are expected to be obtained.

Brine Temperature Set Backs

There appears to be only one temperature set point for the Brine. Varying the brine temperature
according to different activities can reduce the compressor run time up to 8%. The Energy Saving Manual
for Ice Arena and Rink Operators Handbook suggest that the Brine be set to -4°C (25°F) for ice
maintenance and the night time, -6°C (22°F) for low load periods, -7°C (20°F) for figure skating and -8°C
(18°F) for Hockey.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 29 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 5-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with Brine Temperature Set Backs at the
Hillsburgh Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.02 38 1,439 5,000 N/A 3

Incentive IESO “Retrofit Program”: the lessor of $800/kW of Demand Savings or $0.10/kWh of
Details Annual Savings or 50% of Eligible Project Costs; $1500 minimum

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

Ice Resurfacer - Replacement

The existing ice resurfacer is assumed to be a mid-efficiency model and is approaching the end of its
PUL. Pinchin recommends upgrading the unit to a high efficiency model which can lead to 21% energy
savings. Refer to Table 5-3.

Table 5-4 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Hillsburgh
Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

At end of PUL 0.02 8 446 100,000 N/A 224

Incentive Details N/A

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the building’s energy consumption.

Demand Control Ventilation

The existing ventilation system does not appear to have CO2 censors and is assumed to operate at pre-
set ventilation rates, typically based on the maximum occupancy level of the building. As the occupancy
level fluctuates continuously, energy is wasted when the occupancy drops below these pre-determined
rates.

Demand Control Ventilation (DCV) ventilates as well as condition the air during heating or cooling
periods, based on the occupancy level at any specific time. CO2 sensors are used to monitor air quality
and provide real-time feedback to the controls. The controls then adjust the fan speed, modifying the
ventilation rates to suit the number of occupants in the building.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 30 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Pinchin recommends connecting the RTU and MUAs to include CO2 sensors. Enbridge currently offers a
$500 incentive for each RTU/MUA with a CO2 sensor. The costs and savings have not been
included for this measure as they could not be calculated with confidence. This measure is
expected to yield energy, thermal comfort and maintenance benefits. Pinchin recommends further
investigate using an energy

6.0 WATER CONSERVATION

Domestic Systems

Based on the information gathered from the domestic water system audit, most toilets, urinals, shower
heads, kitchen faucets and lavatory faucets have conventional flow rates.

The Site buildings can reduce water if they update the remaining toilets, urinals, shower heads, kitchen
faucets and lavatory faucets to ultra low flow options (< 4.8 LPF, <0.5 LPF, < 3.8 LPM, <3.8 LPM and
<1.9 LPM respectively).

6.1.1 High Efficiency Toilets

High efficiency toilets consume 4.8 litres per flush (LPF), while conventional toilets consume 13.25 LPF.
As shown in Table 1-4, the Site building currently uses upgraded 6 LPF toilets and conventional toilets.
Converting the toilets to 4.8 LPF models would reduce the associated water consumption by
approximately 20% or 30,233 litres a year.

6.1.2 High Efficiency Urinals

High efficiency urinals consume 3.8 LPF, while ultra low flow urinals consume 0.5 LPF toilets consume
13.25 LPF. As shown in Table 1-4, the Site building currently uses upgraded 3.8 LPF urinal. Converting
the urinals to 3.8 LPF models would reduce the associated water consumption by approximately 87% or
29,046 litres a year.

6.1.3 High Efficiency Bathroom Faucets

High efficiency bathroom faucets consume 1.9 litres per minute (LPM) of use, significantly lower than that
of conventional 8.3 LPM faucets. As shown in Table 1-4, the Site building currently makes use of
upgraded 5.7 LPM faucets and conventional faucets. Converting all the faucets to higher efficiency 1.9
LPM faucets would reduce the associated water consumption by approximately 77% or 54,394 litres a
year.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 31 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

6.1.4 High Efficiency Kitchen Faucets

High efficiency kitchen faucets consume 5.7 LPM, ultra-low flow faucets consume 3.8 LPM, while
conventional kitchen faucets consume 8.3 LPM. As shown in Table 1-5, the Site building currently makes
use of conventional 8.3 LPM kitchen faucet fixtures. Converting the conventional kitchen faucets to ultra-
low flow 3.8 LPM faucets would reduce the associated water consumption by approximately 60% or 1,044
litres a year.

6.1.5 High Efficiency Shower Heads

High efficiency showerheads consume 5.7 LPM, while ultra-low flow showerheads consume 3.8 LPM and
conventional showerheads consume 9.5 LPM. As shown in Table 1-7, the Site building currently makes
use of fifteen (15) shower heads. The flowrates of the showers were assumed to be 9.6 LPM. Converting
shower heads to ultra-low flow models would reduce the associated water consumption by approximately
60% or 1,044 litres a year. In addition, the retrofit would reduce energy consumption associated with
domestic hot water heating by approximately .11 GJ.

Table 6-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with plumbing fixture retrofit at the
Hillsburgh Community Centre

Annual Annual System Incentives Simple Payback


Implement
Savings Savings ($) Cost ($) Available ($) (years)
115 590
At end of PUL 4,675 N/A 8
Water (m3) Water
0.11 1
Gas (GJ) Gas

Incentive Details N/A

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

Ice Resurfacer

It is common for operators of ice resurfacer to fill the tank to its fill capacity instead of the minimum level
of water required for ice resurfacing. If the tank is filled beyond the minimum requirements, the extra
water will cool down without being used and the energy spent to heat the extra water will go to waste.

Review the operating guide for the ice resurfacer and install a gauge so that operators can tell when the
unit is sufficiently filled.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 32 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

7.0 LIGHTING RECOMMENDATIONS

Light Fixture Retrofit

The majority of interior lighting at the Site Building is assumed to be a mixture of the following:

• 2’x4’ recessed troffers with two 40W T12 fluorescent tube lamps and electronic ballasts;

• 1’x4’ surface mounted troffers with two 40W T12 fluorescent tube lamps and electronic
ballasts;

• 2’x4’ high bays with four or six 12 LED T8 tube lamps

• Incandescent, fluorescent and halogen Bulbs

• Exterior 150W HPS wall pack; and

• Exterior wall mounted Halogen lamps.

Modern LED T8s are over 60% more efficient than the equivalent fluorescent lamp. The LED bulbs are
approximately 30% more efficient than their CFL counterparts.

Figure 7-1 Energy consumption comparison of existing and proposed lighting.

80.0
66.8
70.0
Consumption (GJ)

60.0
Annual Electrical

50.0
40.0
30.0 25.9
20.0
10.0
-
Current Lighting System Proposed Lighting System

The LED retrofit will allow for less maintenance due to their improved longevity when compared to
fluorescent and incandescent fixtures. As the cost and lifespan of fixtures will fluctuate, the payback
period will not factor in maintenance related savings. Pinchin does not expect comfort/health benefits to
be obtained.

As outlined in Figure 7-1, the recommended improvements to the lighting system are expected to reduce
annual electricity consumption by up to 41 GJ, and the power demand by up to 0.03 GJ. These
reductions translate to $23,800 in annual savings. Table 7-1 outlines the estimated costs, savings and

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 33 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

incentives associated with implementing the recommended lighting upgrades at Hillsburgh Community
Centre.

Table 7-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with lighting retrofit at Hillsburgh Community
Centre

Annual
Demand Annual System Incentives
Energy Simple Payback
Implement Reduction Savings Cost Available
Savings (years)
(GJ) ($) ($) ($)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.03 41 1,270 23,802 3,025 16

Incentive Details IESO “Retrofit Program”: $400/kW of Demand Savings

Note: Assumes an average of 2.34 weekly operating hours for low use rooms and 12 hours for exterior
lighting (7 days a week).

Table 7-2 summarizes the type and quantity of lights existing lighting system and the proposed lighting
system for the Site Building.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 34 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 7-2 Summary of Existing and Proposed Lighting Fixtures on Site

Watts Lamps Present Annual Proposed Proposed Proposed Annual


Hrs of # of
Area Type per per Demand Consum. Lighting Watts Demand Savings
OPR Fixtures
Lamp Fixture (kW) (kWh) System Lamp (kW) (kWh)
W.R. 8' Surface Mount Linear 72 75 2 3 0.45 32 4' LED T8 12 0.07 27
Fluorescent T12
6' Wall Mount Linear 72 54 1 1 0.05 4 4' LED T8 12 0.01 3
Fluorescent T12
Incandescent 72 60 1 1 0.06 4 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.01 4
Closets/ 4' Surface Mount Linear 132 40 2 2 0.16 21 4' LED T8 12 0.05 15
Storage Fluorescent T12
rooms
Incandescent 132 60 1 2 0.12 16 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.02 13
Change 4' Surface Mount Linear 2520 40 3 9 1.08 2722 4' LED T8 12 0.32 1905
Rooms Fluorescent T12
Incandescent 1260 40 1 3 0.12 151 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.03 117
Equip. 4' Suspended Linear 640 60 2 27 3.24 2074 4' LED T8 12 0.65 1659
Rooms Fluorescent T12
Halogen Bulb 640 43 1 1 0.04 28 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.01 22
Banquet 4' Recessed Linear 72 40 2 17 1.36 98 4' LED T8 12 0.41 69
Hall Fluorescent T12
CFL Wall Sconce 72 13 1 8 0.10 7 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.07 2
Kitchen/ 4' Recessed Linear 72 40 2 5 0.40 29 4' LED T8 12 0.12 20
Bar Fluorescent T12
4' Under Cabinet Linear 72 34 2 1 0.07 5 4' LED T8 12 0.02 3
Fluorescent T12
Snack 4' Recessed Linear 2520 40 2 6 0.48 1210 4' LED T8 12 0.14 847
Bar Fluorescent T12
Hallways/ 4' Surface Mount Linear 2520 40 2 15 1.20 3024 4' LED T8 12 0.36 2117
Stairwells Fluorescent T12
Incandescent 2520 60 1 2 0.12 302 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.02 257

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 35 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Offices/ 4' Recessed Linear 2552 40 2 6 0.48 1225 4' LED T8 12 0.14 857
Meeting Fluorescent T12
Rooms
Ice Rink Incandescent 132 60 1 6 0.36 48 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.05 40
Ice Rink 4' LED T8 2520 12 6 21 1.51 3810 4' LED T8 12 1.51 0
4' LED T8 1260 12 4 2 0.10 121 4' LED T8 12 0.10 0
Exterior HPS Wall Pack 4380 150 1 4 0.60 2628.00 LED Wall Pack 40 0.60 2628
CFL A19 Bulb 4380 14 1 1 0.01 61 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.01 22
Halogen Bulb 4380 43 1 5 0.22 941.70 LED A19 Bulb 9 0.05 745
Total 12 18,562 5 23,802

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 36 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Motion Controlled Light Switch Installation

The lighting systems at Hillsburgh Community Centre are generally user controlled with the exception of
motion controlled lighting in the Men’s and Women’s washrooms. Pinchin recommends installing more
motion detecting light switches to control the lighting throughout the entire building. The motion detectors
reduce energy loss due to lights being left on in unoccupied rooms. One demerit of motion controlled light
switches is that they will continue operation of the lighting system for 90 seconds after the occupant has
left the area. These systems also consume energy 24/7 to remain in standby mode.

Table 7-3 outlines the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with implementing the motion
controlled light switch upgrades after the LED lighting retrofit at Hillsburgh Community Centre.

Table 7-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with Motion Controlled Light Switch
installation at Hillsburgh Community Centre

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.004 8 233 660 N/A 3

Incentive Details IESO “Retrofit Program”: $400/kW of Demand Savings; $1500 minimum

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already in
place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

8.0 BUILDING ENVELOPE RECOMMENDATIONS

Supplemental Wall Insulation

Pinchin completed a review of the exterior wall system of Site building during the on-Site review. Based
on the architectural drawings and construction methods in the 1950s, Pinchin assumes the current wall
assembly is R2 on average.

Pinchin calculated the heat loss from the exterior wall system of the conditioned space as approximately
356 GJ/year, resulting in an annual energy cost of approximately $5,880.

Pinchin recommends supplementing the insulation levels (of the conditioned space) to reach R20. The
new insulation levels would only account for approximately 36 GJ/year based on the average 2017-2018
annual heating degree days. The associated annual energy cost is approximately $590. The proposed
insulation levels would result in 90% less heat loss than the existing levels and an annual savings of
$5,300.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 37 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 8-1 outlines the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with supplementing the wall
insulation levels at Hillsburgh Community Centre. The insulation will also reduce the buildings cooling
load, however due to many unknown variables it has not been factored into the savings and payback
period. Pinchin presents this option aware that it may lead to a loss of architectural character at the Site
Building. We therefore recommend this retrofit to take place when/if building envelope repairs are
required due to the poor thermal performance (i.e. significant cracking).

Table 8-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with supplemental wall insulation at
Hillsburgh Community Centre

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

During building
N/A 323 5,292 77,500 1,300 15
envelope repairs

Incentive Details Enbridge “Commercial Custom Retrofit Program”: $0.15/m3 natural gas
savings

Continued Inspections

Pinchin recommends regular building condition inspections to prevent against deteriorations going
unknown. Ongoing preventative maintenance ensures small-scale deficiencies are addressed before they
lead to a large-scale capital projects being required premature to the end of their lifespan.

Eavestroughs are particularly susceptible to damage in the winter months. Water can infiltrate into the
flashing edges, expands during the freeze temperatures and thaw, leaving behind gaps allowing water to
penetrate further into the roof system. Pinchin expects this measure to yield energy savings and comfort
benefits.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 38 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

9.0 POWER GENERATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Pinchin recommends the installation of a photovoltaic (PV) array at the roof level, to generate electrical
energy. Solar power generation can reduce electricity bills, provide power security and generate income
all with low environmental impact and low maintenance costs. The retractions of solar energy are the
initial cost and its dependency on weather. The roof of the Site building has little shading and would
present a great base for a PV array. Pinchin assumed a 1575sm array would be installed at the roof
above the ice arena.

Refer to Table 9-1.

Table 9-1 Summary of costs and earnings associated with a PV Array Installation at Hillsburgh
Community Centre

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Generation Earnings Available Payback
Generation Cost ($)
(kW) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

After roof repairs 0.85 1,079 33,476 75,000 N/A 2

Incentive N/A

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already in
place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 39 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

10.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

The following table is a summary of the major utility saving projects identified for Hillsburgh Community
Centre.

Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Est.


Potential Est.
Electrical Gas Water GHG Cost Est. Grant
Recommendation Savings Payback
Savings Savings Savings Savings Savings Cost ($) Incentive
(%) (Yrs.)
(GJ) (GJ) (m3) (Kg) ($) ($)
Programmable
4.1 Thermostats 21.5 1,117 628 1% 3,000 0 5
(576 m3)
Installation
4.2 BAS Installation 4.2 82.1 4,597 1,488 4% 109,000 1,366 72
(1,175 kWh) (2,206 m3)

4.3 RTU Replacement 1.2 4,741 382 0% 10,000 0 26


(328 kWh)
Furnace -
4.3 Condensing 91.1 4,741 457 4% 20,000 400 43
(2,447 m3)
Replacement
Drain Heat 40.7
4.4 2,117 204 2% 6,500 0 32
Recovery Retrofit (1,093 m3)
DHW Heaters -
4.5 Tankless 56.5 2,940 283 3% 22,000 2,000 71
(1,518 m3)
Replacement
Ice plant - Heat 179 229.9
4.6 25,682 13,003 19% 40,000 5,899 3
Recovery (8,509 kWh) (6,173 m3)

Brine Pump VFD 80.2


5.1 (22,288 6,152 2,742 4% 20,000 2,229 6
Installation kWh)
Brine Pump -
Program 30.6
5.2 2,349 1,093 1% 5,000 0 5
Temperature (8,509 kWh)
Setbacks
Ice Resurfacer 8.1
5.3 (8,509 6 446 0% 100,000 0 224
Replacement LPG #)
Domestic Water 0.11
6.1 124 6 635 0% 4,675 3 7
Fixture Retrofits (3 m3)
40.9
7.1 Lighting Retrofit (11,372 3,139 1,270 2% 23,802 3,025 16
kWh)
Motion Controlled 7.5
7.2 575 233 0% 660 0 3
Light Switches (2,084 kWh)

Supplement Wall 141.3 181.4


8.1 (39,247 20,268 5,292 15% 77,500 1,300 14
Insulation (4871 m3)
kWh)

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 40 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

The following table is a summary of the opportunity for power generation at the Hillsburgh Community
Centre.

Annual Annual Est.


Annual Est.
Electrical GHG Est. Grant
Recommendation Earnings Payback
Generation Savings Cost ($) Incentive
($) (Yrs.)
(GJ) (Kg) ($)
9.1 PV Array Installation 1,079 82,730 33,476 75,000 0 2

11.0 DISCARDED CONSIDERATIONS

Pinchin considered and rejected the following recommendations due to the low energy savings and/or
their low return on investment.

Unit Heater Replacement

The existing gas-fired unit heater (UH) has an 81% efficiency, which is low compared to the high
efficiency models that are now available. This is a good opportunity to install a gas-fired condensing unit
heater, which will have an efficiency of up to 95%. Due to the large improvement in efficiency, the heating
capacity of the unit can be reduced from 40,500 Btuh to 33,000 Btuh without interrupting the heating
output. This measure will reduce the relevant gas consumption by about 14%. Refer to Table 11-1.

Table 11-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with Unit Heater Replacement at the
Hillsburgh Community Centre

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.02 6 32 5,000 200 150

Incentive Details "Equipment Incentive Program": $200/unit

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

Supplemental Roof Insulation

Pinchin completed a review of the roofing system of Site building during the on-Site review. Based on
typical construction methods and roof condition, Pinchin assumes the current roof assembly R value
(imperial) is approximately R20. Pinchin calculated the heat loss from the roof as approximately 195
GJ/year, resulting in an annual energy cost of approximately $3,200.

Pinchin recommends supplementing the insulation levels to reach R40. The additional insulation would
only account for approximately 97.5 GJ/year based on the 2017-2018 heating degree-days. The

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 41 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

associated annual energy cost is approximately $1,600. The proposed insulation levels would result in
50% less heat loss than the existing levels and an annual savings of $1,600.

Table 11-2 outlines the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with supplementing the roof
insulation levels at Hillsburgh Community Centre. The insulation will also reduce the building’s
refrigeration load, however due to many unknown variables it has not been factored into the savings and
payback period.

Table 11-2: Summary of Costs and Savings associated with Supplemental Attic Insulation at
Hillsburgh Community Centre

Implement Demand Annual Annual System Incentives Payback


Reduction Energy Savings Cost ($) Available With
(kW) Savings ($) ($) Incentives
(kWh)

During next roof


N/A 98 1,599 421,515 393 263
replacement

Incentive Details Enbridge “Commercial Custom Retrofit Program”: $0.15/m3 natural gas
savings

12.0 NON-FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

Pinchin has also reviewed the potential conservation measures with consideration to non-financial
benefits classified into the following:

1. Potential improvements to health and safety within the Site building.

2. Potential improvements to operational procedures within the Site building.

3. Potential improvements occupant comfort within the Site building.

All energy savings measures that Pinchin considered have been recommended in this report.

13.0 RECOMMENDED ITEMS FOR ASHRAE LEVEL III (CAPITAL GRADE) ENERGY AUDIT

Pinchin recommends a capital grade analysis of the following measures:

• VFDs at pumps and VSDs at motors (Recommendation 5.1)

o Model the reduction in corresponding energy savings.

• Demand Control Ventilation (Recommendation 5.3)

o Model the reduction in corresponding energy savings.

• Supplemental Wall Insulation (Recommendation 8.2)

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 42 of 42


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 8, 2019
95 Main St, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

• Model the reduction in heat gain during the summer months and corresponding
energy savings.

14.0 TERMS AND LIMITATIONS

This work was performed subject to the Terms and Limitations presented or referenced in the proposal for
this project.

Information provided by Pinchin is intended for Client use only. Pinchin will not provide results or
information to any party unless disclosure by Pinchin is required by law. Any use by a third party of
reports or documents authored by Pinchin or any reliance by a third party on or decisions made by a third
party based on the findings described in said documents, is the sole responsibility of such third parties.
Pinchin accepts no responsibility for damages suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or
actions conducted. No other warranties are implied or expressed.

The information provided in this report is based upon analysis of available documents, analytical results,
records and drawings, and personal contacts and interviews. In performing the assessment, Pinchin has
relied in good faith on information provided by the individuals noted in this report. Pinchin has assumed
that the documents, analytical results, records and drawings, and information provided by the individuals
noted in this report, including information provided in contacts and personal interviews, is factual and
accurate. Pinchin accepts no responsibility for any deficiency, misstatement or inaccuracy contained in
this report as a result of negligence, omissions, misinterpretations or fraudulent acts of persons
interviewed or contacted, or contained in reports that were reviewed, and makes no representation or
warranty as to the qualifications of any such persons or the reliability of information or reports provided by
them, whether or not such persons were introduced to the Client by Pinchin.

Pinchin did not attempt to identify locations of deposition of mould spores or particles, or minor mould
growth that would not exhibit any signs of spotting/staining on building materials. Pinchin would not be
able to identify locations of concealed mould growth within wall cavities and other hidden locations
without performing intrusive inspections. The degree of mould growth noted in the report may change with
time if water or humidity issues continue or develop after the assessment date(s). Any sources of water
infiltration or high humidity must be corrected to prevent the continuation or occurrence of mould growth.
Air sampling results (if any) will apply only to the time and conditions of the testing and may not be used
to reliably predict conditions on other days.
J:\241000s\0241444.000 TofErin,VariousSites,Erin,BSS,BCA\Deliverables\Energy Audits\Final Reports\Hillsburgh CC\241444, FINAL ASHRAE Level II EA, HCC, T of Erin, 95
Main St, Hillsburgh, ON Oct 8, 2019.docx

Template: Master Report for Energy Audit, BSS, July 3, 2018

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 43 of 42


APPENDIX I
Utility Bill Data
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Gas (m3)

Dec-16 28 3,020
Jan-17 32 3,045
Feb-17 31 3,410
Mar-17 28 2,460
Apr-17 33 1,519
May-17 29 1,164
Jun-17 30 147
Jul-17 31 154
Aug-17 32 311
Sep-17 31 21
Oct-17 30 688
Nov-17 29 3,171
Dec-17 31 2,870
Jan-18 31 4,274
Feb-18 30 3,246
Mar-18 29 3,028
Apr-18 31 2,284
May-18 31 1,087
Jun-18 31 248
Jul-18 30 209
Aug-18 30 162
Sep-18 32 654
Oct-18 29 1,099

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 8


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Electricity (kWh)
Date Duration (Days)
Meter# 2000 8797 3109
9-Dec-16 29 4535
11-Jan-17 33 3986
9-Feb-17 29 4674
15-Mar-17 34 2429
10-Apr-17 26 1620
10-May-17 30 2150
15-Jun-17 36 4,535
12-Jul-17 27 3,986
11-Aug-17 30 4,674
19-Sep-17 39 2,429
12-Oct-17 23 1,620
10-Nov-17 29 2,150
12-Dec-17 32 851
11-Jan-18 30 1,439
9-Feb-18 29 168
13-Mar-18 32 953
12-Apr-18 30 3,194
10-May-18 28 4,786
11-Jun-18 32 2,852
12-Jul-18 31 2,758
13-Aug-18 32 3,043
10-Sep-18 28 2,853
12-Oct-18 32 2,663
12-Nov-18 31 1,463
10-Dec-18 28 1,150
11-Jan-19 32 1,057
11-Feb-19 31 1,313
6-Mar-19 23 1,322
10-Apr-19 35 3,483
10-May-19 30 4,390
9-Dec-16 29 3,035

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 8


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Electricity (kWh)
Date Duration (Days)
Meter# 2000 8797 3109
11-Jan-19 32 2,957
11-Feb-19 31 1,806
6-Mar-19 23 3,435
10-Apr-19 35 3,435
10-May-19 30 2,853

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 3 of 8


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Electricity (kWh)
Date Duration (Days)
Meter# 2000 4310 7878
4-Jan-17 36 39,120
2-Feb-17 29 31,320
2-Mar-17 28 31,560
31-Mar-17 29 28,200
1-May-17 31 2,400
30-May-17 29 1,680
28-Jun-17 29 1,920
28-Jul-17 30 1,320
29-Aug-17 32 960
28-Sep-17 30 35,520
30-Oct-17 32 40,800
28-Nov-17 29 30,840
29-Dec-17 31 28,680
30-Jan-18 32 25,440
28-Feb-18 29 27,000
29-Mar-18 29 25,320
30-Apr-18 32 3,720
30-May-18 30 1,680
28-Jun-18 29 1,920
30-Jul-18 32 1,320
29-Aug-18 30 1,440
28-Sep-18 30 35,880
30-Oct-18 32 36,840
28-Nov-18 29 30,120
31-Dec-18 33 33,120
30-Jan-19 30 25,080
28-Feb-19 29 24,480
29-Mar-19 29 26,400
30-Apr-19 32 12,000
4-Jan-17 36 39,120
2-Feb-17 29 31,320
2-Mar-17 28 31,560

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 4 of 8


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Liquid Propane Gas (Pounds)

Dec-16 165
Jan-17 12 99
Jan-17 7 99
Jan-17 14 137
Jan-17 7 66
Feb-17 7 99
Feb-17 14 165
Feb-17 7 5
Mar-17 14 5
Mar-17 7 165
Mar-17 1 132
Apr-17 13 132
Sep-17 164 264
Sep-17 4 66
Oct-17 14 99
Oct-17 7 33
Oct-17 7 66
Oct-17 7 33
Oct-17 7 66
Nov-17 7 99
Nov-17 7 66
Nov-17 7 66
Nov-17 7 99
Dec-17 7 66
Dec-17 14 132
Dec-17 8 33
Jan-18 13 66
Jan-18 7 66
Jan-18 7 66
Jan-18 7 66
Feb-18 14 66

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 5 of 8


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Liquid Propane Gas (Pounds)

Feb-18 7 66
Feb-18 7 66
Mar-18 7 66
Mar-18 14 66
Mar-18 7 66
Sep-18 172 264
Oct-18 17 132
Oct-18 14 66
Oct-18 7 66
Oct-18 14 66
Nov-18 7 66
Nov-18 7 66
Nov-18 7 66
Nov-18 7 66
Dec-18 7 33
Dec-18 7 99
Dec-18 7 33
Dec-18 6 66
66
Jan-19 9 66
Jan-19 6 33
Jan-19 7 66
Jan-19 7 66
Jan-19 7 38
Feb-19 14 66
Feb-19 8 66
Feb-19 6 99
Mar-19 7 33
Mar-19 7 66
Mar-19 7 66
Mar-19 7 33
Apr-19 14 66

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 6 of 8


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Liquid Propane Gas (Pounds)

Dec-16 165
Jan-17 12 99
Jan-17 7 99
Jan-17 14 137
Jan-17 7 66
Feb-17 7 99
Feb-17 14 165
Feb-17 7 5
Mar-17 14 5
Mar-17 7 165
Mar-17 1 132
Apr-17 13 132
Sep-17 164 264
Sep-17 4 66

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 7 of 8


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Water (m3)

Mar-17 90 92
Jun-17 89 46
Sep-17 93 27
Dec-17 77 78
Mar-18 98 116
Jun-18 87 28
Sep-18 100 9
Dec-18 75 105
Apr-19 113 122
Jun-19 76 10

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 8 of 8


APPENDIX II
Photographs
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

View of the banquet hall and recessed lighting at the second floor.

View of shower and urinal in typical change room.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 2


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

View of mechanical room with two (2) furnaces and one (1) DHW heater.

View of the ice rink with overhead lighting and low-e drop ceiling.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 2


APPENDIX III
Mechanical Equipment List
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

*Assumed Value

Remaining
Unit Make Model # Output (HP) Cond. PUL Age
Lifespan

RTU #1 Carrier 50TC- 24.3 kW Good 25 2 23


D08A2A1A0
B0A0

RTU #2 Carrier 50DK501445 20 Tons* Poor 25 Unkn 0


"Weather own
master"

Furnace #1 Brock BHG 250 250,000 Btuh Fair to 30 29 1


Poor

Furnace #2 Brock BHG 250 250,000 Btuh Fair to 30 29 1


Poor

Unit Heater Lennox LF24-50A-1 50,000 Btuh Poor 15 25 0

Electric FFH Unknown Unknown 1.5 kW* Fair 15 Unkn 2


#1 and #2 own

Electric FFH Unknown Unknown 2 kW* Fair 15 Unkn 2


#3 own

Dehumidifier Cimco MK VII 8.5 HP Fair to 20 Unkn 1


#1 and #2 Humicon Poor own

DHW Heater Bradford RG2PV75H6 76,000 Btuh Good 12 2019 12


White N

HW Heater John JW70- 250,000 Btuh Poor - 12 2001 0


Woods 250NED Failed

Chiller Cimco Unknown 100HP* Fair 25 Unkn 5


own

Evaporative BAC VC1-110 10 HP Fair 18 Unkn 5


Condenser own

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 2


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

Pumps and Motors – Hillsburgh Community Centre


*Assumed Value

Remaining
Function Make Model Capacity PUL Age
Lifespan
Brine Pump Optim 15 HP Fair 25 6
#1

Brine Pump Armstrong 35T9A 10 HP Fair 25 Unknown


#2

Compressor Vilter Unknown 50 HP Good 25 Unknown


Motor

Compressor Vilter Unknown 50 HP Good 25 Unknown


Motor

Water Baldor JM35460-5 1/2 HP Good 15 4*


Purifier
Pump

Evaporative WEG JM002504DPW01 2 HP Good 15 4


Condenser
Pump

Evaporative BAC VC1-110 10 HP Good 20 3


Condenser
Fan

Evaporative BAC VC1-110 1 HP Fair 10 26*


Condenser
Spray Pump

Pump - Unknown Unknown 215 W* Fair 10 Unknown


Recirculation

Exhaust fan Unknown Unknown 403 W* Fair 20 Unknown


#1

Exhaust fan Unknown Unknown 403 W Fair 20 Unknown


#2

Motor - Ice Olympia Unknown Unknown Fair 15 17


Resurfacer

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 2


APPENDIX IV
Ranking of Measures
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Ranking of Measures Appendix IV

Ranking of Measures

Annual Annual Annual Annual Estimated


Annual Potential Estimated
Gas Water Cost GHG Estimated Grant
Section Recommendation Electrical Savings Payback
Savings Savings Savings Savings Cost ($) Incentive
Savings (GJ) (%/year) (Years)
(GJ) (m3) ($) (Tonnes) ($)

DHW Heater - Tankless


4.6 56.5 2,940 283 3% 22,000 1,570 72.1
Replacement

4.6 DHW Heater - 56.5 2,940 283 3% 22,000 3,570 65.0


Tankless Replacement

4.7 Ice plant - Heat 179.0 229.9 25,682 13,003 19% 40,000 11,359 2.2
Recovery

7.2 Motion Controlled Light 7.5 575 233 0% 660 0 3


Switches

5.2 Brine Pump - Program 30.6 2,349 1,093 1% 5,000 0 5


Temperature Setbacks

4.1 Programmable 21.5 1,117 628 1% 3,000 0 4.8


Thermostats
Installation

5.1 Brine Pump VFD 80.2 6,152 2,742 4% 20,000 2,229 6.5
Installation

6.1 Domestic Water 0.1 124 6 635 0% 4,675 3 7.4


Fixture Retrofits

8.1 Supplement Wall 141.3 181.4 20,268 13,891 15% 244,093 18,822 16
Insulation

7.1 Lighting Retrofit 40.9 3,139 1,270 2% 23,802 3,025 16

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 2


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Ranking of Measures Appendix IV

4.3 RTU Replacement 1.2 4,741 382 0% 10,000 0 26.2

4.5 Drain Heat Recovery 40.7 2,117 204 2% 6,500 0 31.8


Retrofit

4.4 Furnace - Condensing 91.1 4,741 457 4% 20,000 2,932 37.3


Replacement

4.2 BAS Installation 4.2 82.1 4,597 1,488 4% 109,000 2,199 71.8

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 2


APPENDIX V
Assumptions and Calculations
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

Calculating Current Loads:

Load Inventory

Assumptions (Based on observed data, drawings or similar products):

Assumed
Assumed input
Annual
Category Description Location Qty Power
Operating
Unit
Hours

Cooling RTU Roof 1 24 24,300 W


Cooling RTU Roof 1 24 20 Ton
DHW DHW Heater Mech. Rm 1 891 76,000 Btuh
DHW DHW Heater Serves Ice Resurfacer 1 891 250,000 Btuh
Heating Heater Ice Rink 1 2,107 1,500 W
Ceramic 2,107
Heating Ice Rink 1 1,500 W
Heater
Olympia Room and Refs 1,691
Heating Wall FFH 2 1,500 W
Box
electric force 1,691
Heating flow heater Sports Office 1 2,000 W
located
RTU - 1,691
Heating Accessory Roof 1 17,000 W
Heater
RTU - 1,691
Heating Accessory 1 34,000 W
Heater
Heating Furnace Serves Upstairs 1 754 250,000 Btuh
Heating Furnace Serves Downstairs 1 754 250,000 Btuh
Heating Unit Heater Ice Plant 1 754 50,000 Btuh
Ice Plant Dehumidifier Motors 2 2,107 9 HP
Ice Plant Dehumidifier Drain Heater 2 2,107 210 W
Brine Pump
Ice Plant Olympia Room 1 2,688 14 HP
No 1
Brine Pump
Ice Plant Olympia Room 1 2,688 10 HP
No 2
Evaporative
Cooling
Ice Plant Exterior 1 2,258 10 HP
Tower - Fan
Motor
Evaporative
Ice Plant Exterior 1 2,258 1 HP
Cooling

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 8 of 8


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

Tower -
Pump Motor
Ice Plant Pump Ice Plant 1 2,107 0 HP
Ice Plant Pump Ice Plant 1 2,107 2 HP
Compressor
Ice Plant Ice Plant 1 1,505 50 HP
No.1
Compressor
Ice Plant Ice Plant 1 1,505 50 HP
No.2
Mini Fridge
Kitchen Upstairs Kitchen 1 12 28,000 W
(ES)
Cooler
Kitchen Upstairs Kitchen 1 8,760 920 W
(Drinks)
Cooler
Kitchen Upstairs Kitchen 1 8,760 1,357 W
(Drinks)
4 Burner
Kitchen Stover with Upstairs Kitchen 1 Not In Use
Griddle
Kitchen Dishwasher Upstairs Kitchen 1 30 1,500 W
Kitchen Microwave Upstairs Kitchen 1 30 900 W
Popcorn
Kitchen Kitchen - Concessions 1 424 820 W
Maker
Hot Dog
Kitchen Kitchen - Concessions 1 424 1,200 W
Warmer
Kitchen Coffee Pot Kitchen - Concessions 1 424 1,350 W
Large Coffee
Kitchen Kitchen - Concessions 1 424 4,050 W
Pot
Kitchen Freezer Kitchen - Concessions 1 6,048 575 W
Kitchen Fridge Kitchen - Concessions 1 8,760 690 W
Kitchen Microwave Kitchen - Concessions 2 424 900 W
Kitchen Floor Buffer Back Office 1 30 1,300 W
Kitchen Toaster Back Office 1 30 1,200 W
Plug Load Hand Dryer Washrooms 2 30 1,200 W
Plug Load TV 2 2,520 200 W
Plug Load Small Printer Office 1 8,760 44 W
Plug Load Monitor Office 1 1,280 75 W
Plug Load Computer Office 1 1,280 30 W
Plug Load Phone Office 3 8,760 2 W
Vending
Plug Load Hallway 1 3,504 345 W
Machine
Vending
Plug Load Hallway 1 3,504 1,230 W
Machine
Plug Load AV Receiver Sports Office 1 421 165 W

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 8 of 8


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

Compact
Plug Load Sports Office 1 421 16 W
Disc Player
Power
Plug Load Sports Office 1 421 380 W
Amplifier
Garage Door
Plug Load Olympia Room 1 211 1 HP
Opener
Large Clock/
Plug Load Ice Rink 1 421 33 W
Timer
Score
Plug Load Ice Rink 1 2,107 600 W
System
Bathroom
Ventilation Washrooms 2 120 60 W
Fan
Wall-
mounted
Ventilation Olympia Room 1 754 403 W
propeller
exhaust fan
Wall-
mounted
Ventilation Compressor room 1 891 403 W
propeller
exhaust fan

• Sample Calculation:
14 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 7 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 52 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 75 𝑊𝑊
𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 = 7 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 × × × ×
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶
Cooling Loads

• Assumptions:
• Cooling is required only during event times, approximately 24 hours a year

• Sample Calculation:
3,412 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏ℎ
24.3 𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘ℎ ×
𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 = 𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘ℎ × 24 ℎ𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜
11.6 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆
Individual Mechanical Equipment Loads

• Assumptions:

• All equipment loads with unknown operating hours will operate with equal proportion, except
heating.

• Heating equipment only operates during heating season, as determined by the portion of
Brampton HDDs from 2017 to 2018 (i.e. 98%).

• The portion of the energy that a piece of equipment uses is equal to its demand multiplied by
the seasonal proportion of their use and divided by the sum of all demands using that same

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 8 of 8


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

utility (gas/electric) whose annual loads do not have assumed operating hours (i.e. lighting,
elevators, standalone coolers and freezers and office equipment plug loads).

• The portion of the energy that a piece of non-seasonal equipment uses is equal to its demand
divided by the sum of all non-seasonal equipment demands using that same utility
(gas/electric) whose annual loads are have NOT known/previously assumed, multiplied by
100% subtracted by the sum of all seasonal proportions for the corresponding utility

• The overall energy use is equal to the calculated portion of energy consumption for a piece of
equipment multiplied by the annual average for the corresponding utility.

Energy Conservation Recommendations

Program Thermostats

• Assumptions:
• 3% reduction in cooling energy consumption for every Fahrenheit degree the thermostat is
increased.

• Programmable thermostats have historically been set to 72°F in the summer and 68°F in the
winter. Heating and cooling are off after hours.

• The new thermostat program will involve increasing the cooling set point by 6°F.

• The new thermostat program will involve reducing the heating set point by 1°F and the
setback by 1°F degrees.

• The total annual cooling load is 3 GJ and the heating load is 801 GJ.

• Calculation:
8 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 16 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = �� × (72°F − 78°F ) × 3%� + � × (85°F − 85°F ) × 3%��
24 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 24 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
× 3 𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺
14 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 10 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
+ �� × (70°F − 68°F ) × 3%� + � × (66°F − 65°F ) × 3%��
24 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 24 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
× 801 𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺
BAS Conversion

• Assumptions:
• 15% reduction in heating, cooling ventilation energy consumption (less savings already
achieved via the programmable thermostats);

• Additional cooling savings cannot be achieved as the programmable thermostat retrofit


reduces the cooling load by more that 15%

• The thermostat program is already in place and performing as calculated.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 8 of 8


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 15%
× �𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 × (1 − 𝑇𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 %)
+ 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 × (1 − 𝑇𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 %)
+ 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 × (1 − 𝑇𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 %)�
RTU Replacement

• Assumptions:
• New RTU will have an EER of 18.

• The BAS is already in place and reducing the energy from the RTUs by 15%.

• The unit will be resized to achieve the existing output, given an 18 EER.

• Calculation:

18 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 × 𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × (1 − 15%𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵 ) × �1 − ∑ 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸.𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖
� × �1 +

∑ 𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐸𝐸𝑥𝑥.𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖

∑ 18 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁
∑ 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸.𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖

Furnace Replacement

• Assumptions:
• Existing furnaces has an efficiency of 77%.

• New furnaces will have an efficiency of 96%.

• The energy input of the new furnaces will be lower in relation to the improved efficiency (will
preserving the existing output).

• The BAS is already in place and reducing the energy from the furnaces by 15%.

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × (1 − 15%𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵 ) × (𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 − 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸. 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 ) ×
𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁
�1 + �
𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

Unit Heaters Replacement

• Assumptions:
• Existing unit heater has an efficiency of 83%.

• New unit heaters will have an efficiency of 95%.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 8 of 8


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

• The energy input of the new unit heaters will be 13% lower (will preserving the existing
output).

• The BAS is already in place and reducing the energy from the unit heaters by 15%.

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × (1 − 15%𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵 ) × (𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 − 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸. 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 ) ×
𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁
�1 + �
𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

Drain Heat Recovery Retrofit

• Assumptions:
• Retrofit will improve reduce DHW heating demand by 57%

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 57% × 71 𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺
DHW heater Replacement

• Assumptions:
• Two Existing DHW heaters have an efficiency of 80%.

• New DHW heaters will have an efficiency of 96%.

• Tankless DHW heaters will reduce standby heat loss by 14%.

• The energy input of the new DHW will be lower in relation to the improved efficiency (will
preserving the existing output).

• The Drain Heat Recovery Retrofit is already in place and reducing the energy from the unit
heaters by 57%.

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑎𝑎𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣𝑣 = 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × (1 − 57%𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 ) × (𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 − 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸. 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 ) ×
𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁
�1 + � × (1 + 14%)
𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

Ice Plant Heat Recovery

• Assumptions:
• The heat recovery potential is equal to the refrigeration capacity of the ice plant

• The refrigeration capacity is the sum of the chiller compressor capacities (100HP)

• Approximately 15% of waster heat may will be lost

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 8 of 8


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

• The heat can be recovered 1792 hrs a year.

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 × (1 − .15%) × 1792ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟

Brine Pump VFD Installation

• Assumptions:
• The pumps cycling the existing pumps bumps to simulate a two-speed brine pump system,

• Installing a VFD will reduce the Brine pump power required by 30% and will reduce overall
energy consumption by 35%.

• The reduction in Brine pump power will reduce the compressor energy consumption by 5%

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = (𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢. × 35%) + (𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × 5%)

Brine Pump Program Temperature Setbacks

• Assumptions:
• The Brine pump will use 8% less energy

• The VFD is already installed on the Brine Pump and is saving 35%.

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑣𝑣𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 = 𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × (1 − 35%) × 8%

Ice Resurfacer Replacement

• Assumptions:
• Replacement will improve the efficiency of the ice resurfacer by 21%

• Current Ice resurfacer consumes 39 GJ a year.

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 21% × 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶
Domestic Water Systems

• Assumptions:
• Half of employees are male and half are female.

• There are 2.5 Fulltime equivalent employees year round.

• There is an average of 2293 visitors a day, every day

• Lavatory faucets are used 3 times a day for 15 seconds for each employee.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 8 of 8


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 8, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

• Toilets without posted flowrates use 6.0 LPF.

• Each female employee uses the toilet 3 times in an 8 hour workday.

• Each male employee uses the toilet .5 times in an 8 hour workday.

• Each visitor uses the toilet 0.5 times a day.

• Each male employee uses the urinal 2.5 times in an 8 hour workday.

• Kitchen Faucets without posted flowrates use 8.3 LPM.

• Kitchen faucets are used for 15 seconds a day by each employee.

• Kitchen faucets use at least 1L of water per patron.

• One in four visitors are also patrons of the kitchen

• Custodial sinks without posted flowrates use 8.3 LPM.

• Shower heads with aerators without posted flowrates use 9.6 LPM.

• Each shower head is used for 6 minutes a day, 6 times a day, 7 days a week, 32 weeks a
year.

Building Envelope Heat Loss

• Calculation:
24ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻 (𝑊𝑊) = 𝑈𝑈 × 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 × 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻 ×
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 8 of 8


FINAL
Energy Audit -
ASHRAE Level II
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario

Prepared for:

Town of Erin
5684 Trafalgar Rd.
Hillsburgh, ON N0B 1Z0

Attention: Ursula D’Angelo


Director of Finance

October 16, 2019

Pinchin File: 241444

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd.


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Issued to: Town of Erin


Contact: Ursula D’Angelo
Director of Finance
Issued on: October 16, 2019
Pinchin File: 241444
Issuing Office: Mississauga, ON
Primary Pinchin Contact: Melissa Anastacio, P.Eng., LEED AP
905.363.1434
manastacio@pinchin.com

Author: Ms. Carleen Lawson, MBSc, BAS


Project Technologist
289.971.7431
clawson@pinchin.com

Reviewer: Mr. Paul Frasie, M.Eng., P.Eng., LEED Green Associate


Senior Project Manager
905.363.1457
pfrasie@pinchin.com

Reviewer: Mr. Ahmed Alyousif, PhD., P.Eng.


Director, Building Science and Sustainability
905.363.1459
aalyousif@pinchin.com

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page i


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Pinchin Ltd. (Pinchin) was retained by Town of Erin to conduct an energy audit of the Erin Fire Station No.
50 located at 2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario.

The purpose of the energy audits is to identify how energy is used on site and how to maximize available
funds across the best energy conservation measures. To achieve the greatest energy reduction, the
Client would like to implement a series of energy conservation measures (ECMs).

This report provides an analysis of historical energy data at the Town of Erin building located at 2 Station
Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario, to determine the effects of weather, billing abnormalities and analyze current
energy and water systems. Energy consumption data is summarized by end use such as lighting, heating,
cooling, ventilation and plug loads. Energy conservation measures for the subject building are
summarized based on the information gathered during Pinchin’s facility audit and information provided by
the client.

Annual Annual Annual Annual Est.


Potential Est.
Electrical Gas GHG Cost Est. Grant
Recommendation Savings Payback
Savings Savings Savings Savings Cost ($) Incentive
(%) (Yrs.)
(GJ) (GJ) (Kg) ($) ($)
Programmable
4.1 Thermostats 17.8 38.6 3,371 447 5% 0 0 0
(4,942 kWh) (1,036 m3)
Installation
IR Tube Heater -
4.3 Two Stage 20.7 1,077 104 2% 30,000 83 288
(556 m3)
Replacement
Drain Heat 21.3
4.5 1,110 107 2% 6,500 86 60
Recovery Retrofit (573 m3)
DHW Heater -
4.4 Tankless 11.7 611 59 1% 10,000 47 169
(315 m3)
Replacement
4.6 RTU Replacement 7.9 71.4 4,321 603 7% 30,000 3,858 43
(2,192 kWh) (1,919 m3)
55.1
7.1 Lighting Retrofit (15,298 4,222 1,708 5% 18,900 1,984 10
kWh)
Motion Controlled 4.9
7.2 374 151 0% 440 0 3
Light Switches (1,354 kWh)
8.1. DG Window 4.4 35.0 2,160 313 3% 25,113 0 80
1 Replacement (1,229 kWh) (940m3)
8.1. TG Window 5.3 41.7 2,576 373 4% 32,879 0 88
2 Replacement (1,466 kWh) (1,466 m3)

Pinchin’s proposed energy conservation measures aim to reduce the building’s EUI by approximately
28%, resulting in an EUI of 0.63 GJ/m2/yr. The annual energy cost and maintenance savings associated

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page ii


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

with achieving the Post-Retrofit EUI is approximately $3,500 (assuming that TG windows are selected
over DG windows).

The following table is a summary of the opportunity for power generation at the Erin Fire Station No. 50.

Annual Annual Est.


Annual Est.
Electrical GHG Est. Grant
Recommendation Earnings Payback
Generation Savings Cost ($) Incentive
($) (Yrs.)
(GJ) (Kg) ($)
9.1 PV Array Installation 0.79 981 30,425 210,000 N/A 7

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page iii


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
Facility Overview................................................................................................................... 1
Building Operations .............................................................................................................. 2
1.2.1 Recent Building Upgrades and Contemplated Energy Conservation Measures ......... 2
1.2.2 Typical Energy Consumption Breakdown .................................................................... 3
HVAC Equipment ................................................................................................................. 3
Pumps and Motors................................................................................................................ 5
Lighting ................................................................................................................................. 6
Building Envelope ................................................................................................................. 7
2.0 UTILITY INFORMATION.................................................................................................................. 8
Annual Utility Cost Breakdown ............................................................................................. 8
Energy Consumption ............................................................................................................ 9
2.2.1 Energy Consumption Summary ................................................................................... 9
2.2.2 Energy Consumption Analysis ................................................................................... 10
3.0 ENERGY CONSUMPTION BENCHMARKING ............................................................................. 13
Introduction to Energy Use Intensity .................................................................................. 13
Energy Use Intensity Analysis ............................................................................................ 13
Actual Energy Use Breakdown ........................................................................................... 14
4.0 HVAC RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................... 15
Programmable Thermostats Installation ............................................................................. 16
IR Tube Heater – Two Stage Replacement ....................................................................... 17
RTU – High Efficiency Replacement .................................................................................. 17
Drain Heat Recovery Retrofit.............................................................................................. 18
DHW Heater Replacement ................................................................................................. 18
Install Sub-Meters at the Major Mechanical Equipment. .................................................... 19
5.0 PUMPS AND MOTORS RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................... 19
Installation Variable Flow Drive (VFDs) on Pumps and Variable Speed Drives (VSDs) Fan
Motors 19
6.0 LIGHTING RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................ 19
Light Fixture Retrofit ........................................................................................................... 19
Motion Controlled Light Switch Installation ......................................................................... 24
7.0 BUILDING ENVELOPE RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 24
Window Retrofit .................................................................................................................. 24
Continued Inspections ........................................................................................................ 26
8.0 POWER GENERATION RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................... 28
9.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 28
10.0 DISCARDED CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................ 29
Install a Digital BAS (Building Automation System) ........................................................... 29
Supplemental Roof Insulation............................................................................................. 30
Supplemental Wall Insulation ............................................................................................. 31

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page iv


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

11.0 NON-FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS.......................................................................................... 32


12.0 RECOMMENDED ITEMS FOR ASHRAE LEVEL III (CAPITAL GRADE) ENERGY AUDIT......... 32
13.0 TERMS AND LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................... 33

PPENDICES

APPENDIX I Utility Bill Data


APPENDIX II Photographs
APPENDIX III HVAC Equipment List
APPENDIX IV Ranking of Measures

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page v


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1: Building Characteristics ............................................................................................... 2


Table 1-2 HVAC Energy Conservation Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 50 ................ 5
Table 1-3 Pumps and Motors Energy Conservation Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No.
50 .................................................................................................................................................. 6
Table 1-4 Lighting Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 50 ................................................ 7
Table 1-5 Building Envelope Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 50 ................................ 8
Table 3-1 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Erin Fire Station No. 50 .......................................... 15
Table 4-1 Major HVAC Equipment in Use at Erin Fire Station No. 50 ........................................ 16
Table 4-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with the installation of programmable at
Erin Fire Station No. 50............................................................................................................... 17
Table 4-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with IR tube heater replacement at the Erin
Fire Station No. 50 ...................................................................................................................... 17
Table 4-4 Summary of costs and savings associated with RTU Replacement at the Erin Fire
Station No. 50 ............................................................................................................................. 18
Table 4-5 Summary of costs and savings associated with Drain Heat Recovery retrofit at the
Erin Fire Station No. 50............................................................................................................... 18
Table 4-6 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Erin Fire
Station No. 50 ............................................................................................................................. 19
Table 6-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with lighting retrofit at Erin Fire Station No.
50 ................................................................................................................................................ 21
Table 6-2 Summary of Existing and Proposed Lighting Fixtures on Site .................................... 22
Table 6-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with Motion Controlled Light Switch
installation at Erin Fire Station No. 50 ......................................................................................... 24
Table 7-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with full DG window replacement at Erin
Fire Station No. 50 ...................................................................................................................... 26
Table 7-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with full triple glazing window replacement
at Erin Fire Station No. 50 ........................................................................................................... 26
Table 8-1 Summary of costs and earnings associated with PV Array Installation repairs at Erin
Fire Station No. 50 ...................................................................................................................... 28
Table 10-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with pneumatic to DDC conversion at the
Erin Fire Station No. 50............................................................................................................... 29
Table 10-2: Summary of Costs and Savings associated with Supplemental Roof Insulation at
Erin Fire Station No. 50............................................................................................................... 31
Table 10-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with supplemental wall insulation at Erin
Fire Station No. 50 ...................................................................................................................... 32

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page vi


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Typical Energy End-Use Breakdown in a Fire Station ................................................. 3


Figure 1-3 Estimated Breakdown of Annual Lighting Energy Consumption ................................. 6
Figure 2-1 Breakdown of Average Annual Utility Costs ................................................................ 9
Figure 2-2: Annual Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Erin Fire Station No. 50 .... 9
Figure 2-3: Monthly Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Erin Fire Station No. 50 . 10
Figure 2-4 Electricity and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis ......................................... 11
Figure 2-5: Electricity and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis ........................................ 11
Figure 2-6: Natural Gas and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis .................................... 12
Figure 2-7: Natural Gas and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis..................................... 12
Figure 2-8: Electricity Consumption and Cooling Degree Days .................................................. 13
Figure 3-1 EUI Comparison between Erin Fire Station No. 50 and ASHRAE EUI Target .......... 14
Figure 3-2 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Erin Fire Station No. 50 ......................................... 15
Figure 6-1 Energy consumption comparison of existing and proposed lighting. ......................... 20
Figure 7-1 Energy consumption comparison of existing DG windows and proposed DG and
Triple glazing window replacement ............................................................................................. 25

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page vii


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Pinchin Ltd. (Pinchin) was retained by Ursula D’Angelo, Director of Finance at Town of Erin to conduct an
ASHRAE Level II Energy Audit of Erin Fire Station No. 50 located at 2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario.

The purpose of the energy audit to is identify how energy is used on site and how to maximize available
funds across the best energy conservation measures. To achieve the greatest energy reduction, the
Client would like to implement a series of energy conservation measures (ECMs).

The audit was conducted by Pinchin assessors, Carleen Lawson and Raven Cote, on July 3rd at which
time Pinchin interviewed and was accompanied by the Fire Chief, hereinafter refer to as the “Site
Representative”.

Cost estimates provided in this report are preliminary Class “D” and provided only as an indication of the
order of magnitude of the remedial work. These values have been arrived at by determining a
representative quantity from the visual observations made at the time of our Site visit and by applying
current market value unit costs to such quantities and or a reasonable lump sum allowance for the work.
More precise cost estimates would require more detailed investigation to define the scope of work. They
are not intended to warrant that the final costs will not exceed these amounts or that all costs are
covered. The estimates assume the work is performed at one time and do not include costs for potential
de-mobilization and re-mobilization if repairs/replacement are spread out over the term of analysis.

All costs are identified in 2019 Canadian Dollars, including a 20% contingency fee to cover unforeseen
costs. Repair/replacement cost estimates are accurate to +/- 50%.

All cost estimates assume that regular annual maintenance and repairs will be performed to all building
elements at the facility. No cost allowance is carried for this regular maintenance.

The cost estimates provided in this report are based on costs of past repairs at similar buildings, recent
costing data such as “RS Means” and “Hanscomb’s Yardsticks for Costing”, or Pinchin’s professional
judgment.

Energy Savings and Demand Savings provided in this report are estimated to an accuracy of +/- 30%

This report satisfies all requirements an ASHRAE level II energy Audit as stated by the
ANSI/ASHRAE/ACCA Standard 211-2018 and ASHRAE Standard 100-2015 -- Energy Efficiency in
Existing Buildings.

Facility Overview

Table 1-1 Provides a Summary of the Building Use and Construction.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 1-1: Building Characteristics

Building Age 7 years (Construction circa 2012);


Ownership Status Owned by Town of Erin

Utility Data Electricity – Hydro One, Gas – Enbridge, Water – Town of Erin
Gross Floor Area 1,356 m2 (14,596 ft2)
Building Type Government (Emergency Services)
Occupied Hours ~ 168 hours/week
Regular Occupancy ~2 fulltime equivalent staff
Roof System Sloped metal and single-ply TPO membrane
Wall System Metal cladding and architectural stone
Windows Insulated glazed, aluminum framed windows; (Window-to-Wall-Ratio: 0.10)

Building Operations

A solid understanding of building operations and occupancy allows building owners to assess the varying
power and ventilation loads and improve the efficiency of energy using systems. The Site Building is
comprised of 1,356 m2 of emergency services space. The Site Building provides EMS and fire fighting
services.

The Site Building is occupied 24 hours a day, 7 days a week by two (2) EMS staff members, while the fire
fighting staff only come in as required. Due to the fluctuation in attendance, the average number of
occupants is difficult to accurately specify. The Site Representative informed Pinchin that there are
approximately 15 to 30 fire fighters that answer a call. The Site Representative reported that there are on
average 200 calls a year. The main kitchen is assumed to be used approximately 1 hour a week and the
EMS kitchen is assumed to be used approximately 14 hours a week, while the fridges and operate all
year.

1.2.1 Recent Building Upgrades and Contemplated Energy Conservation Measures

This section details the recent upgrades and changes to the building as well as any ECMs contemplated
by the building mangers:

• The original 5HP exhaust fan was upgraded to a 10 HP vehicular exhaust system which captures
harmful fumes and improves air quality. The system is controlled by an ABB ACH550 variable
speed drive (VSD) which also mitigates harmonic and saves energy.

• The building managers have contemplated converting from fluorescent to LED lamps.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

1.2.2 Typical Energy Consumption Breakdown

A study of the energy consumption breakdown within similar buildings is a key first step in determining
opportunities for energy reduction (refer to Figure 1-1). Pinchin has provided a breakdown of a fire station
end-use energy. Energy in a fire station is dominantly used by the space heating, equipment, domestic
hot water (DHW) and lighting systems. Recommended retrofits will be focused on these areas to best
improve the Site’s overall energy efficiency and lower utility costs.

Figure 1-1 Typical Energy End-Use Breakdown in a Fire Station 1

Ventilation Cooling
8% 1%
Plug load
1%

Lighting
18%

Heating
49%

Domestic Hot Water


10%

Other Equip
13%

HVAC Equipment

The primary HVAC equipment in use at Erin Fire Station No. 50 is described in the following section. A full
list of the HVAC equipment is provided in Appendix III.

Heating, cooling and ventilation of the Site Building are provided by two (2) gas-fired roof top units (RTUs)
with associated supply and exhaust fans as well as three (3) gas fired low intensity infrared (IR) heaters,
one (1) electric unit heater (UH), one (1) electric baseboard heater (BBH) and five (5) electric force flow
heaters. Additional ventilation is provided by washroom exhaust fans and the kitchen hood fan.

1
Design for Off: Key Mechanical Engineering Design Features for Significant Energy Savings by Jonathan Heller, David Baylon and
Shanti Oram, Ecotope Inc.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 3 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Primarily heating within the Site Building is provided by a gas-fired heating unit manufactured by “Price
Mechanical Industrial”. Based on the data plate the unit was manufactured in 2015 (approximately 4
years old). Heating within the truck bay area is provided by a “Brant” gas-fired radiant tube heating
system, original to the building construction.

Primarily cooling within the Site Building is provided by a gas-fired “Lennox” HVAC rooftop unit. Based on
the data plate the unit was manufactured in 2013 and therefore is approximately 6 years old. The unit
also provides heating to East portion of the building (first and second floor offices and common areas).

Supplementary heating for various localized areas throughout the building is provided by electrical
suspended unit heaters. The units are original to the building construction in 2012 to 2013.

The Site Building’s exhaust system consists of various exhaust fans for the washrooms, change rooms,
truck area, storage, and some common areas. The exhaust fans are vented to the atmosphere through
the exterior walls or through the roof. The fans were observed to be in serviceable condition.

A “Nederman” exhaust fan with extraction arms is serving the truck bay area. The exhaust fan is located
on the rooftop of the building. The fire truck exhaust system is provided with an “ABB” control panel.

The individual HVAC equipment is controlled by individual programmable thermostats and the RTUs also
use CO2 sensors. The Site Representative reported that the there was no thermostat program schedule
in place. During our Site Visit, the cooling set point and setback were observed to be 20 °C (68 °F). The
heating set point and setback are assumed to also be 20 °C (68 °F). Reduced setpoints would reduce
energy consumption and utility costs. This suggested upgrade is discussed further in Section 4 of the
report.

Domestic hot water (DHW) production and storage within the facility is a year-round operation. Domestic
hot water production is accomplished with two (2) tankless DHW heaters. The first DHW heater is a
“Takagi” natural gas-fired instantaneous water heater located in the mechanical room. The unit
possesses a maximum heating capacity of 199,000 BTUH. The second tankless natural gas-fired DHW
heater was noted in the mechanical room with the main water line. The unit is manufactured by “John
Wood” and possesses a maximum heating capacity of 199,900 BTUH.

The recommended upgrades are discussed further in Section 4 of the report.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 4 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 1-2 HVAC Energy Conservation Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 50

Equipment Type Issue Recommendation Section

No established
Programmable program for Program seasonal temperature
4.1
Thermostats temperature set set point and setbacks.
point.

Existing units are


only a one stage Replace with two stage IR Tube
IR Tube Heater 4.2
models and have Heaters
achieved their PUL.

HVAC will continue


to operate when
RTU Replacement Upgrade to BAS system. 4.3
windows are left
open.

Heat from DHW is


Recover drain heat waste to
Shower Drains lost through the 4.4
preheat DHW.
shower drains.

Existing units are


Replace with 96% efficiency
DHW Heater not the highest 4.5
DHW heaters
efficiency models

Meters No sub-meters are Install sub-meters. 4.6


present.

Pumps and Motors

The pumps in use at Erin Fire Station No. 50 include the equipment room compressor pump, the DHW
recirculation pump and those that are associated with the fire safety systems. The motors in use at Erin
Fire Station No. 50 consist of the exhaust fan motors, DHW motor and RTU unit motors.

The fans may be operated by the user or when the heating and cooling modes are engaged by the
programmable thermostat.

Ventilation is a key contributor to the Site building’s base load demand, base power demand and annual
average power factor levels. Power factor is important to consider when analysing the impact of inductive
loads on the Site Building’s annual utility costs; Power factor tends to decrease as inductive loads
increase. In addition, power demand must be considered as it is correlated to electrical equipment use.
Improvements to motor efficiency will lead to a reduction in energy consumption. Table 1-3 lists Pinchin’s
pumps and motor energy conservation recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 50.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 5 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 1-3 Pumps and Motors Energy Conservation Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 50
Equipment Type Issue Recommendation Section

VFDs are not


Install VFDs on all pumps and
Pumps and Motors present on all 5.1
motors (where applicable).
pumps and motors.

Lighting

The lighting systems within Erin Fire Station No. 50 consists of fluorescent lighting throughout the building
with metal halide wall packs located at the exterior. The lighting system is assumed to be entirely
occupant controlled in the hallways, the truck bay and upstairs

The fluorescent and metal halide fixtures currently in use are inefficient and it is recommended that they
are replaced with LED alternatives. A lighting upgrade would reduce energy consumption and utility costs.
These upgrades are discussed further in Section 7 of the report. Refer to Figure 1-3 and Table 1-4.

Figure 1-2 Estimated Breakdown of Annual Lighting Energy Consumption

Lighting
7%

Other
93%

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 6 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 1-4 Lighting Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 50

Lighting
Issue Recommendation Section
Type

Metal Halide Metal Halide and fluorescent


and lighting fixtures are LED lighting retrofit. 6.1
significantly less efficient
Fluorescent than LEDs.

Install occupancy sensors to


Controls Some lighting on site is 6.2
switch controlled. control the lighting.

Building Envelope

This building envelope was reviewed including the windows, exterior cladding and all entrances and exits.
These building systems are subject to air and heat leakage as well as moisture infiltration. Pinchin
recommends ongoing maintenance to ensure the building envelope is in good condition.

The wall system which consists corrugated metal panels and metal panels with sections of rough and
smooth finished architectural stone cladding. The exterior cladding was observed to be in fair to good
condition with minor section of moisture staining observed at the architectural stone cladding. Moisture
degrades the performance of the insulation resulting in a lower R value. Pinchin recommends repairs to
the cladding be completed to maintain the integrity of the building envelope.

The window system of the Site Building consists of aluminum framed punched windows with horizontally
sliding Insulated Glazed units (IGUs). The windows are reportedly original to the building construction
circa 2012 and therefore are approximately 7 years old. As the existing windows are assumed to offer
basic thermal performance, Pinchin recommends upon reaching their Projected Useful Life (PUL), that
they are replaced with modern IGU systems to offer improved thermal performance.

The main entrance doors of the Site Building consist of prefinished aluminum framed door and frame
assemblies with Insulated Glazing units (IGUs). A secondary entrance door consists of an aluminum
framed door with an IGU insert and sidelite. The service doors consist of hollow metal doors within metal
frames. In addition, there are three (3) metal sectional overhead doors. The doors are in generally in good
condition, with no major issues reported or observed. It is expected that maintenance and periodic repairs
of the exterior doors will be completed as required.

The roof of the fire hall was found to consist of a low-sloped metal roofing system with a “near-flat” roof
section that consists of a single-ply TPO membrane. The roof systems are reportedly original to the
construction of the Site Buildings. The metal roofs appeared to be in generally good condition with no
observed signs of moisture infiltration. Pinchin recommends that while the completing the replacement of

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 7 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

roof systems when they reach their PUL, that supplemental insulation be installed to improve the overall
thermal performance. Regular maintenance and condition reviews are recommended.

Refer to Table 1-5 for Building Envelope Recommendations.

Table 1-5 Building Envelope Recommendations at Erin Fire Station No. 50

Area Issue Recommendation Section

Windows Windows are standard double Replace with high efficiency IGUs or
7.1
glazing. Triple glazed assemblies.

Continue conducting routine


Insufficient maintenance can lead to
Facility inspections and ongoing 7.2
unidentified issues.
maintenance.

2.0 UTILITY INFORMATION

The Erin Fire Station No. 50 makes use of electricity, natural gas, propane and water. Monthly electricity
data consumption data was provided for November 2016 to December 2018. Natural gas data was
provided for the period of December 2016 to May 2019.

The date range for the various utilities do not align with each other. For an energy audit it is important to
be able to compare utility data for the same months; therefor, Pinchin will only analyze data from January
2017 to December 2018.

The utility consumption tables have been provided in Appendix I of the report.

Annual Utility Cost Breakdown

Analyzing annual costs of utilities is essential to prioritizing energy conservation measures. Figure 2-1
shows a breakdown of the average annual utility costs at Erin Fire Station No. 50. Electricity consumption
accounts for 70% ($18,554) of annual utility costs and natural gas accounts for 30% ($7,799). Electricity
consumption is assumed to be higher than natural gas as it is associated with a greater range of
applications such as the cooling, ventilation, lighting and plug loads. The combined average annual cost
for all utilities is $26,352. Pinchin has identified conservation measures for each utility which will be
discussed in later sections of the report.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 8 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-1 Breakdown of Average Annual Utility Costs

Natural Gas,
$7,799 , 30%

Electricity,
$18,554 , 70%

Energy Consumption

2.2.1 Energy Consumption Summary

On-site energy is provided by electricity and natural gas for the Site Building. Figure 2-2 provides a
summary of annual electricity, natural gas and total energy consumption for the period from 2017 to 2018
for Erin Fire Station No. 50.

Figure 2-2: Annual Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Erin Fire Station No. 50

Average
Year

2018

2017

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400


Energy Consumption (GJ)
Total Natural Gas Electricity

Figure 2-3 shows the monthly electricity and natural gas consumption, both converted to gigajoules to
allow for comparability, from January 2017 to December 2018. The building has a combination of electric

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 9 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

and gas-fired heat sources, which can be seen by the annual peak in consumption from November to
May.

Figure 2-3: Monthly Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of Erin Fire Station No. 50

350

300
Energy Consumption (GJ)

250

200

150

100

50

0
Nov-17

Nov-18
Apr-17
May-17

Jul-17
Aug-17

Oct-17

Apr-18
May-18

Jul-18
Aug-18

Oct-18
Feb-17

Dec-17

Feb-18

Dec-18
Jan-17

Mar-17

Jun-17

Sep-17

Jan-18

Mar-18

Jun-18

Sep-18
Month
Electricity (GJ) Gas (GJ)

Electricity is used on Site for supplemental heating, cooling, ventilation, lighting and plug loads. The
average monthly consumption is 27 GJ. The seasonal averages were compared, with the winter having
the highest average with 40.1 GJ and summer having the lowest average with 17.1 GJ. The winter
electricity consumption was 2.3 times higher than the spring consumption. This suggests reflects the
operation of the electric heating during the fall and winter months which increases the electricity
consumption.

Natural gas is used on Site for space heating and domestic hot water heating. The average monthly
consumption is 72 GJ. The seasonal averages were compared, with the winter having the highest
average with 138 GJ and summer having the lowest average with 2 GJ. The winter natural gas
consumption was 58 times higher than the summer consumption. This is as expected as space heating
and domestic hot water heating is required less during the summer season.

2.2.2 Energy Consumption Analysis

To determine the effects of weather, two regression analyses were performed each for electricity
consumption and natural gas consumption in relation to heating degree days (HDD) and cooling degree
days (CDD). The climate data used was referenced from Historical Climate Data (2019). The first two
analyses looked at the relationship between electricity consumption, heating degree days and cooling

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

degree days. 2 The correlation between consumption and HDD/CDD is expressed as the displayed value
of R2. Essentially, this represents the amount of energy used per increase in heating/cooling degree day.
The R2 value does not in any way represent how efficiently the system operates. The results in Figure 2-4
and Figure 2-5 show a moderate linear relationship between HDD, CDD and electricity consumption. The
results indicate that the electricity use is mostly directed to heat in the winter and base loads in the
building.

Figure 2-4 Electricity and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis

Electricity Consumption Vs HDD y = 0.0287x + 17.601


50.0 R² = 0.6317
Electricity Consumption

40.0

30.0
(GJ)

20.0

10.0

0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
HDD

Figure 2-5: Electricity and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis

Electricity Consumption Vs CDD


50.0
Electricity Consumption (GJ)

40.0
y = -0.1699x + 31.116
30.0 R² = 0.3073

20.0

10.0

0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
CDD

The next two analyses’ looked at the relationship between natural gas consumption, heating degree days
and cooling degree days. On a scale of 0% to 100%, the relation between gas consumption and HDD in
Figure 2-6 can be expressed as 94%, which indicates a strong correlation. The results are
understandable as natural gas is used to for space heating and domestic hot water heating. The results in

2
A heating degree day is defined as the number of degrees that a day's average temperature is below 18°. If the average outdoor
temperature is 5°C, the corresponding HDD would be 18°C - 5°C = 13°C.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 11 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-7 show a moderate negetive linear relationship between warm outdoor temperatures and natural
gas consumption. This is expected as natural gas use is reduced in the warmer weather.

Figure 2-6: Natural Gas and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis

y = 0.2102x + 1.2051
Gas Consumption Vs HDD R² = 0.9369
200.0
Gas Consumption (GJ)

150.0

100.0

50.0

0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
HDD

Figure 2-7: Natural Gas and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis

y = -1.4678x + 106.56
Gas Consumption Vs CDD R² = 0.6279
200.0
Gas Consumption (GJ)

150.0

100.0

50.0

0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
CDD

The regression analysis for electricity and cooling degree days indicates that cooling is not a significant
source of electricity use and is small in comparison to the natural gas heating.

Figure 2-8 shows the relationship between electricity consumption, natural gas consumption, HDDs and
CDDs on a monthly basis. The graph illustrates a rise in electricity consumption accompanying a rise in
HDDs.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 12 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-8: Electricity Consumption and Cooling Degree Days

180.0 900
160.0 800
Energy Consumption (GJ)

140.0 700
120.0 600

HDD & CDD


100.0 500
80.0 400
60.0 300
40.0 200
20.0 100
0.0 0
Nov-17

Nov-18
Apr-17
May-17

Jul-17

Apr-18
May-18

Jul-18
Aug-17

Oct-17

Aug-18

Oct-18
Feb-17

Dec-17

Feb-18
Mar-18

Jun-18

Sep-18

Dec-18
Jan-17

Mar-17

Jun-17

Sep-17

Jan-18
Months
Gas (GJ) Electricity (GJ) HDD CDD

3.0 ENERGY CONSUMPTION BENCHMARKING

Introduction to Energy Use Intensity

Energy use intensity (EUI) is a standard metric for energy consumption in buildings. The EUI is calculated
as a buildings annual energy consumption divided by its gross floor area. Normalizing the energy usage
for area allows for comparison between buildings and indicates relative performance.

The EUI is a limited metric as it is not normalized for other building characteristics such as climate zone.
To account for this limitation, the report will refer to ASHRAE Standard 100-2015 Energy target which
factors in building activity type, occupancy and climate zone. The targets “represent the 25th bottom (low
energy) percentile of energy use by each building category” 3. The ASHRAE energy target for Erin Fire
Station No. 50 was determined to be 0.78 GJ/m2/year. Please refer to Appendix V for the assumptions
and calculations.

Energy Use Intensity Analysis

On average, from 2017 to 2018 Erin Fire Station No. 50 consumed 328 GJ of electricity and 868 GJ of
natural gas. This amounts to approximately 1,196 GJ of annual energy consumption. The gross floor area
is approximately 1,357m2 (14,603 sf). The resulting EUI is therefore 0.88 GJ/m2/yr. The calculated EUI is
1.14 times higher than the ASHRAE energy target of 0.78 GJ/m2/yr.

3
ASHRAE Standard 100-2015

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 13 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

It is economically feasible to reduce the Site building’s energy consumption by improving the efficiency of
the building systems. Pinchin’s proposed energy conservation measures aim to reduce the building’s EUI
by approximately 28%, resulting in an EUI of 0.63 GJ/m2/yr. The annual energy cost and maintenance
savings associated with achieving the Post-Retrofit EUI is approximately $3,500.

Figure 3-1 EUI Comparison between Erin Fire Station No. 50 and ASHRAE EUI Target

1.00

0.90
Energy Usage Intensity (GJ/m2/year)

0.88
0.80

0.70 0.78

0.60 0.63
0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

0.10

-
Site Building (Current EUI) ASHRAE Target EUI Site Building (Post
Retrofits)

Pinchin recommends installing submeters at major energy systems so a further cost analysis can be
performed, and more savings identified.

Actual Energy Use Breakdown

Pinchin generated an energy use breakdown for Erin Fire Station No. 50 with information collected on site
as well as previous building reports, equipment specifications and utility bill data provided by the client. As
seen in Figure 3-2, space heating accounts for 53% of energy consumed within the facility. Energy
conservation measures are therefore concentrated primarily on heating load reduction and refrigeration
load reductions.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 14 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 3-2 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Erin Fire Station No. 50

Plug Load, 23.2, 1.94% Kitchen, 49.9, 4.17%


Lighting, 79.6, 6.65%

DHW, 304.1, 25.42%


Heating, 643.0, 53.77%

Ventilation, 57.5, 4.81%


Cooling, 38.7, 3.23%

Table 3-1 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for Erin Fire Station No. 50

System Assumed Energy Consumption (GJ) Percentage

Heating 643.0 53.8%

Cooling 38.7 3.2%

Ventilation 57.5 4.8%

DHW 304.1 25.4%

Lighting 79.6 6.7%

Plug Load 23.2 1.9%

Kitchen 49.9 4.2%

4.0 HVAC RECOMMENDATIONS

The major HVAC equipment installed at Erin Fire Station No. 50 is listed in Table 4-1. A description of the
existing HVAC system along with a detailed equipment list can be found in Appendix III of the report.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 15 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 4-1 Major HVAC Equipment in Use at Erin Fire Station No. 50

Heating Cooling
Make Model # Function Condition
Input Output
450,000
Price AW-I-3-40 7.5 Ton Space Conditioning - RTU Good
Btuh
180,000
Lennox KGA092S4BM1Y Space Conditioning - RTU Good
Btuh
Unknown Unknown 3,000 W Space Heating - FFH Good
Unknown Unknown 1,500 W Space Heating - FFH Good
Ouellet Unknown 5,000 W Space Heating - FFH Good
Unknown Unknown 750 W Space Heating - FFH Good
120,000 Space Heating - Tube
Reverberay DX-2-60-100N Good
Btuh Heater
120,000 Fair -
Takagi 520 T-H2-DV-N DHW Heating
Btuh Good
120,000
John Wood JWC111-DV DHW Heating Fair
Btuh

Programmable Thermostats Installation

The individual HVAC equipment is controlled by individual programmable thermostats and the RTUs also
use CO2 sensors. The Site Representative reported that the there was no thermostat program schedule
in place. During our Site Visit, the cooling set point and setback were observed to be 20 °C (68 °F). The
heating set point and setback are assumed to also be 20 °C (68 °F).

In the winter, it is recommended to set the thermostat to 20°C (68°F) during operating hours and 18°C
(65°F) degrees after hours. In the summer, it is recommended to set the thermostat to 25.6°C (78°F)
during operating hours and 29.4°C (85°F) degrees after hours. Each degree Fahrenheit raised in the
summer or lowered in the winter represents up to 3% of energy savings. Based on our observations,
Pinchin assumed that the Site Building can reduce its setback during winter by 1.7°C (3°F), raise its
setback during summer by 9.4°C (17°F) and raise its summer set point by 5.6°C (10°F).

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 16 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 4-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with the installation of programmable at Erin
Fire Station No. 50

Annual
Demand Annual System Incentives Simple
Energy
Implement Reduction Savings Cost Available Payback
Savings
(GJ) ($) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.006 56.4 447 N/A N/A 0

Incentive Details N/A

*Note: The above assumptions are contingent on revised occupant behaviour as the occupant control the
thermostats.

IR Tube Heater – Two Stage Replacement

The existing IR tube heaters are one stage, low intensity models and can only provide a heating output at
one power level We recommend installing new two stage IR tube heaters which are capable of providing
two different heating outputs. This measure is predicted to reduce the relevant gas consumption by about
12% and will reduce ongoing maintenance costs. Refer to Table 4-3.

Table 4-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with IR tube heater replacement at the Erin
Fire Station No. 50

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

At end of PUL 0.04 21 104 30,000 83 288

Incentive Details Enbridge “Commercial Custom Retrofit Program”: $0.15/m3 natural gas savings

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

RTU – High Efficiency Replacement

The existing rooftop units have a thermal efficiency of 65-82% and the Lennox RTU has a cooling Energy
Efficiency Ratio (EER) of 11.2. The units are considered mid-efficiency and there are much more efficient
units available today. Pinchin recommend replacing the existing RTUs with a 91% efficient unit that has
an EER of 18 to reduce energy consumption. This improvement in efficiency means that the replacement
units can have a smaller capacity, further reducing energy use and equipment costs. Furthermore,
improved comfort is anticipated through better air quality and a higher turn around time. Refer to Table
4-4.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 17 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 4-4 Summary of costs and savings associated with RTU Replacement at the Erin Fire
Station No. 50

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

At end of PUL 0.13 79 603 30,000 3,858 43

Incentive Details Enbridge "Equipment Incentive Program": $0.60/CFM

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the building’s energy consumption.

Drain Heat Recovery Retrofit

There does not appear to be a drain heat recovery system in place. Presently the DHW heat from
showers is lost down the drain. Pinchin recommends installing drain heat recovery units at each of the
shower drains. This system will preheat DHW supply water, requiring less gas energy to heat the water to
the desired temperature. Refer to Table 4-5.

Table 4-5 Summary of costs and savings associated with Drain Heat Recovery retrofit at the Erin
Fire Station No. 50

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.03 21 107 6,500 86 60

Incentive Details N/A

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

DHW Heater Replacement

The existing DHW heaters have a 91-93% efficiency on average, which is considered high efficiency.
Pinchin recommends that the units are replaced at the end of their PUL with 96% efficient condensing
tankless water heaters.

This improvement in efficiency means that the replacement unit can have a smaller capacity, further
reducing energy use and equipment costs. Refer to Table 4-6.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 18 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 4-6 Summary of costs and savings associated with DHW heater retrofit at the Erin Fire
Station No. 50

Demand Annual Incentives Simple


Annual Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings (GJ) Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.02 12 59 10,000 47 169

Incentive Details Enbridge “Commercial Custom Retrofit Program”: $0.15/m3 natural gas savings

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

Install Sub-Meters at the Major Mechanical Equipment.

Based on information gathered on Site, there are no sub meters installed on the major HVAC equipment.
It is highly recommended that the sub-meters be installed and recorded on a regular basis to track energy
consumption. Sub-metering will not save energy but will help identify energy consumption trends and
quantify opportunities for savings with improved accuracy.

5.0 PUMPS AND MOTORS RECOMMENDATIONS

Installation Variable Flow Drive (VFDs) on Pumps and Variable Speed Drives (VSDs) Fan
Motors

Installing a VFD to control the remaining pumps and motors would significantly reduce the amount of
energy consumed by reducing the motor’s operating speed and operating capacity in relation to the
demand within the facility.

The costs and savings have not been included for this measure as they could not be calculated with
confidence. VFDs reduce the operating power of the pumps to meet demand, as a result the components
experience less wear and tear, prolonging their PUL and reducing maintenance costs. This measure is
expected to yield some energy savings; no comfort savings are expected to be obtained.

6.0 LIGHTING RECOMMENDATIONS

Light Fixture Retrofit

The majority of interior lighting at the Site Building is assumed to be a mixture of the following:

• 2’x4’ recessed troffers with one to three 32W T8 fluorescent tube lamps and electronic
ballasts;

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 19 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

• 1’x4’ surface mount troffers with one to two 32W T8 fluorescent tube lamps and
electronic ballasts;

• 1’x8’ surface mount troffers with four 32W T8 fluorescent tube lamps and electronic
ballasts;

• 4' suspended fixtures with four 54W T5 fluorescent tube lamps;

• 4' wall mounted fixtures with two 54W T5 fluorescent tube lamps;

• 4' strip light with either two 32W T8 or 54W T5 fluorescent tube lamps and electronic
ballasts;

• LED and CFL pot lights;

• Exterior 250 W or 320 W metal halide wall pack;

• Exterior 250 W or 320 W metal halide wall pack;

• Exterior wall mounted CFL; and

• Exterior LED pot lights.

While the fluorescent T8s are efficient compared to older T12 lights, modern LED T8s are 63% more
efficient than the equivalent fluorescent lamp [going from 32 W to 12W]. The LED pot lights are
approximately 38% more efficient than their CFL counterparts.

Figure 6-1 Energy consumption comparison of existing and proposed lighting.

The LED retrofit will allow for less maintenance due to their improved longevity when compared to
fluorescent and incandescent fixtures. As the cost and lifespan of fixtures will fluctuate, the payback
period will not factor in maintenance related savings. Pinchin does not expect comfort/health benefits to
be obtained.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 20 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

As outlined in Figure 6-1, the recommended improvements to the lighting system are expected to reduce
annual electricity consumption by up to 228 GJ, and the power demand by up to 0.12 GJ. These
reductions translate to $1,700 in annual savings. Table 6-1 outlines the estimated costs, savings and
incentives associated with implementing the recommended lighting upgrades at Erin Fire Station No. 50.

Table 6-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with lighting retrofit at Erin Fire Station No.
50

Annual
Demand Annual System Incentives
Energy Simple Payback
Implement Reduction Savings Cost Available
Savings (years)
(GJ) ($) ($) ($)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.02 55 1,708 18,900 1,984 10

Incentive Details IESO “Retrofit Program”: $400/kW of Demand Savings

Note: Assumes an average of 2.34 weekly operating hours for low use rooms, and 12 hours for exterior
lighting (7 days a week).

Table 6-2 summarizes the type and quantity of lights existing lighting system and the proposed lighting
system for the Site Building.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 21 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 6-2 Summary of Existing and Proposed Lighting Fixtures on Site

Watts Lamps Present Annual Proposed Proposed Proposed Annual


Hrs of # of
Area Type per per Demand Consum. Lighting Watts Demand Savings
OPR Fixtures
Lamp Fixture (kW) (kWh) System Lamp (kW) (kWh)
EMS 4' Recessed Linear
8760 32 3 3 0.29 2,523 4' LED T8 12 0.11 1,577
Area Fluorescent T8
4' Recessed Linear
8760 32 1 3 0.10 841 4' LED T8 12 0.04 526
Fluorescent T8
Main
4' Surface Mount
Meeting 520 32 2 15 0.96 499 4' LED T8 12 0.36 312
Linear Fluorescent T8
Room
14" LED Pot Light 520 20 1 10 0.20 104 0.00 104
4' Surface Mount
Kitchen 520 32 3 2 0.19 100 4' LED T8 12 0.07 62
Linear Fluorescent T8
4' Linear Fluorescent
Closets 132 32 2 8 0.51 68 4' LED T8 0.00 68
T8 Strip Light
4' Surface Mount
W.R. 1000 32 2 5 0.32 320 4' LED T8 12 0.12 200
Linear Fluorescent T8
6" LED Pot
6" CFL Pot Light 1000 13 1 2 0.03 26 7 0.01 12
Light
4' Recessed Linear
Offices 1000 32 3 4 0.38 384 4' LED T8 12 0.14 240
Fluorescent T8
4' Surface Mount
Stairs 2628 32 2 7 0.45 1,177 4' LED T8 12 0.17 736
Linear Fluorescent T8
4' Surface Mount
Hallways 2628 32 1 7 0.22 589 4' LED T8 12 0.08 368
Linear Fluorescent T8
Mech. 4' Surface Mount
132 32 2 4 0.26 34 4' LED T8 12 0.10 21
Rooms Linear Fluorescent T8
Bunker 4' Surface Mount
800 32 4 3 0.38 307 4' LED T8 12 0.14 192
Room Linear Fluorescent T8
Truck 4' Wall Mounted 2190 54 2 10 1.08 2,365 4' LED T5 25 0.50 1,270

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 22 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Bay Linear Fluorescent T5


4' Suspended Linear
2190 54 4 10 2.16 4,730 4' LED T5 25 1.00 2,540
Fluorescent T5
4' Surface Mount
2190 32 4 5 0.64 1,402 4' LED T8 12 0.24 876
Linear Fluorescent T8
4' Linear Fluorescent
Gym 1000 54 2 6 0.65 648 4' LED T5 25 0.30 348
T5 Strip Light
Second 4' Linear Fluorescent
1000 32 2 6 0.38 384 4' LED T8 12 0.14 240
Floor T8 Strip Light
Metal Halide Wall LED Wall
Exterior 4380 320 1 4 1.28 5,606 140 1.28 5,606
Pack Pack
Metal Halide Wall LED Wall
4380 250 1 4 1.00 4,380 40 1.00 4,380
Pack Pack
Wall Mounted
Wall Mounted CFL 4380 26 2 2 0.10 456 13 0.10 456
LED
6" LED Pot Light 4380 26 1 3 0.08 342 0.08 342
Total 10 22,107 5 15,298

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 23 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Motion Controlled Light Switch Installation

The lighting systems at Erin Fire Station No. 50 are generally occupant controlled in the hallways, the
truck bay and upstairs, while motion sensors control the remaining lighting. Pinchin recommends
installing more motion detecting light switches to control the lighting throughout the entire building. The
motion detectors reduce energy loss due to lights being left on in unoccupied rooms. One demerit of
motion controlled light switches is that they will continue operation of the lighting system for 90 seconds
after the occupant has left the area. These systems also consume energy 24/7 to remain in standby
mode.

Table 6-3 outlines the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with implementing the motion
controlled light switch upgrades after the LED lighting retrofit at Erin Fire Station No. 50.

Table 6-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with Motion Controlled Light Switch
installation at Erin Fire Station No. 50

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.003 4.9 151 440 N/A 3

Incentive Details IESO “Retrofit Program”: $400/kW of Demand Savings

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already in
place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

7.0 BUILDING ENVELOPE RECOMMENDATIONS

Window Retrofit

Pinchin completed a review of the current window systems throughout the building during the on-Site
review. Window assemblies are mostly from construction of the original building (2013).

Pinchin used the software Lbnl Window to calculate the overall U-value of the current windows. The heat
loss from existing windows were calculated as 57.1 GJ, resulting in $450 of associated utility costs.

Pinchin has modelled the heat transfer for two different types of replacement windows. The first proposed
option is a full replacement with double glazed window systems with an adjusted U-value of 1.40 W/m2K,
as mandated by Energy Star for Climate Zone 2. The replacement windows are anticipated as being vinyl
framed.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 24 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

The second proposed option is a full replacement with triple glazed window systems with an adjusted U-
value of 0.8 W/m2K. The replacement windows are anticipated as being vinyl framed.

The analysis used an average of the 2017 and 2018 climate and energy data to determine potential
energy savings. The new double glazing and triple glazing windows would have only accounted for 17.7
GJ and 10.1 GJ respectively. The associated annual energy cost is approximately $140 for double
glazing windows and $80 for triple glazing windows. The proposed systems would result in 60% and 78%
less heat loss than the old windows and an annual savings of $313 and $373 respectively (refer to Figure
7-1).

Figure 7-1 Energy consumption comparison of existing DG windows and proposed DG and Triple
glazing window replacement

70.0

60.0 57.1

50.0
Consumption (GJ)
Annual Electricity

40.0

30.0
17.7
20.0
10.1
10.0

-
Existing Glazing New Double Glazing Triple Glazing

Table 7-1 and Table 7-2 outline the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with implementing
the recommended window upgrades at Erin Fire Station No. 50. The window replacement will also reduce
the building’s cooling load, however due to many unknown variables, this benefit has not been factored
into the savings and payback period.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 25 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 7-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with full DG window replacement at Erin Fire
Station No. 50

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Phased as ex. units


N/A 39.4 313 25,113 N/A 80
achieve their PUL

Incentive Details N/A

Note: Assumes 36 sm of window replacement with an allowance of $60 per square foot.
Assumes 92 sm of an exterior grade sealant applied to perimeter window frames with an allowance of $6
per linear foot.

Table 7-2 Summary of costs and savings associated with full triple glazing window replacement at
Erin Fire Station No. 50

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Phased as ex. units


N/A 47.0 373 32,879 N/A 88
achieve their PUL

Incentive Details N/A

Note: Assumes 36 sm of window replacement with an allowance of $85 per square foot.
Assumes 92 sm of an exterior grade sealant applied to perimeter window frames with an allowance of $6
per linear foot.

Continued Inspections

Pinchin recommends regular building condition inspections to prevent against deteriorations going
unknown. Ongoing preventative maintenance ensures small-scale deficiencies are addressed before they
lead to a large-scale capital projects being required premature to the end of their lifespan.

Bi-monthly roof inspections should be conducted to ensure the following:

• Eavestroughs area continuous, secured firmly in place and clear of debris: and

• Signs of water infiltration should be identified and remediated.

Eavestroughs are particularly susceptible to damage in the winter months. Water can infiltrate into the
flashing edges, expands during the freeze temperatures and thaw, leaving behind gaps allowing water to

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 26 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

penetrate further into the roof system. Pinchin expects this measure to yield energy savings; however, no
comfort or maintenance benefits are expected.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 27 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

8.0 POWER GENERATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Pinchin recommends the installation of a PV array at the roof level. Solar power generation can reduce
electricity bills, provide power security and generate income all with low environmental impact and low
maintenance costs. The retractions of solar energy is the initial cost and its dependency on weather. The
roof of the Site building has little shading and would present a great base for a PV array. Pinchin
assumed a 1600sm array would be installation at both roof levels of the Site Building.

Table 8-1 outlines the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with supplementing the wall
insulation levels at Erin Fire Station No. 50.

Table 8-1 Summary of costs and earnings associated with PV Array Installation repairs at Erin Fire
Station No. 50

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Generation Earnings Available Payback
Generation Cost ($)
(kW) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

After roof repairs 0.79 981 30,425 210,000 N/A 7

Incentive N/A

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already in
place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

9.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

The following table is a summary of the major utility saving projects identified for Erin Fire Station No. 50.

Annual Annual Annual Annual Est.


Potential Est.
Electrical Gas GHG Cost Est. Grant
Recommendation Savings Payback
Savings Savings Savings Savings Cost ($) Incentive
(%) (Yrs.)
(GJ) (GJ) (Kg) ($) ($)
Programmable
4.1 Thermostats 17.8 38.6 3,371 447 5% 0 0 0
(4,942 kWh) (1,036 m3)
Installation
IR Tube Heater -
4.3 Two Stage 20.7 1,077 104 2% 30,000 83 288
(556 m3)
Replacement
Drain Heat 21.3
4.5 1,110 107 2% 6,500 86 60
Recovery Retrofit (573 m3)
DHW Heater -
4.4 Tankless 11.7 611 59 1% 10,000 47 169
(315 m3)
Replacement
4.6 RTU Replacement 7.9 71.4 4,321 603 7% 30,000 3,858 43
(2,192 kWh) (1,919 m3)
7.1 Lighting Retrofit 55.1 4,222 1,708 5% 18,900 1,984 10

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 28 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

(15,298
kWh)
Motion Controlled 4.9
7.2 374 151 0% 440 0 3
Light Switches (1,354 kWh)
8.1. DG Window 4.4 35.0 2,160 313 3% 25,113 0 80
1 Replacement (1,229 kWh) (940m3)
8.1. TG Window 5.3 41.7 2,576
(1,466 kWh) (1,466 m3) 373 4% 32,879 0 88
2 Replacement

The following table is a summary of the opportunity for power generation at the Erin Fire Station No. 50

Annual Annual Est.


Annual Est.
Electrical GHG Est. Grant
Recommendation Earnings Payback
Generation Savings Cost ($) Incentive
($) (Yrs.)
(GJ) (Kg) ($)
9.1 PV Array Installation 0.79 981 30,425 210,000 N/A 7

10.0 DISCARDED CONSIDERATIONS

Pinchin considered and rejected the following recommendations due to their low return on investment.

Install a Digital BAS (Building Automation System)

As previously mentioned, ventilation, cooling and space heating within the facility area provided controlled
via a combination of digital and pneumatic thermostats.

The installation of a BAS will allow the Building manager to optimize the efficiency and accuracy of all wall
mounted thermostats and exhaust fans. It would be possible to achieve the desired space conditions
faster than before and reduce the amount of space heating and cooling. This measure is expected to
provide energy savings and comfort benefits Table 10-1 outlines the estimated savings associated with
the pneumatic to digital BAS conversion at the Erin Fire Station No. 50. This measure will reduce the
HVAC energy consumption by about 15%.

Table 10-1 Summary of costs and savings associated with pneumatic to DDC conversion at the
Erin Fire Station No. 50

Demand Annual Energy Annual Incentives Simple


System
Implement Reduction Savings Savings Available Payback
Cost ($)
(GJ) (GJ) ($) ($) (years)

Immediately 0.002 18 345 67,000 N/A 193

Incentive Details N/A

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 29 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Note: Savings are calculated based on the assumption that the previous recommendations are already
in place and reducing the buildings energy consumption.

A digital BAS will provide long term benefits:

• More information for intelligent building management;

• Lower energy costs through better operating efficiency; and

• Lower maintenance cost through less need for calibration and service of the equipment.

The new BAS shall comprise, at minimum, the following components:

• Distributed Control Panels (DCP);

• Unitary Controllers (UC);

• Automation level Local Area Networks (LAN);

• Field instrumentation including intelligent sensors;

• Automatic Digital Control Valves;

• Actuators for automatic valves and motorised dampers (DDC Control);

• Software;

• Cable and containment; and

• All power supplies and conditioners, interlocking and control relays, equipment enclosures
and other components, materials and services required for a completed and fully operational
turnkey BAS installation meeting these specifications.

The BAS shall meet the following general criteria:

• Fully networked;

• Real time;

• Distributed processing; and

• No single point of failure.

The new BAS shall be configured to ensure reliability of systems operation and control of critical
functions/systems. Each contractor must verify on their own that the BAS is compatible with the
equipment to be controlled.

Supplemental Roof Insulation

Pinchin completed a review of the roofing system of Site building during the on-Site review. Based on
typical construction methods, observed blisters and reported leaks, Pinchin assumes the current roof

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 30 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

assembly R value (imperial) is approximately R20. Pinchin calculated the heat loss from the roof as
approximately 90 GJ/year, resulting in an annual energy cost of approximately $700.

Pinchin recommends supplementing the insulation levels to reach R40. The additional insulation would
only account for approximately 45 GJ/year based on the 2017-2018 heating degree-days. The associated
annual energy cost is approximately $350. The proposed insulation levels would result in 50% less heat
loss than the existing levels and an annual savings of $350.

Table 10-2 outlines the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with supplementing the roof
insulation levels at Erin Fire Station No. 50. The insulation will also reduce the buildings refrigeration load,
however due to many unknown variables it has not been factored into the savings and payback period.

Table 10-2: Summary of Costs and Savings associated with Supplemental Roof Insulation at Erin
Fire Station No. 50

Implement Demand Annual Annual System Incentives Payback


Reduction Energy Savings Cost ($) Available with
(kW) Savings ($) ($) Incentives
(kWh)

During next roof


N/A 45 356 193,815 N/A 545
replacement

Incentive Details N/A

Supplemental Wall Insulation

Pinchin completed a review of the exterior wall system of Site building during the on-Site review. Based
on the architectural drawings and construction methods in the 2013, Pinchin assumes the current wall
assembly is R20 on average.

Pinchin calculated the heat loss from the exterior wall system as approximately 107 GJ/year, resulting in
an annual energy cost of approximately $850.

Pinchin recommends supplementing the insulation levels to reach R40 (with exception of the third floor).
The new insulation levels would only account for approximately 54 GJ/year based on the average 2017-
2018 annual heating degree days. The associated annual energy cost is approximately $425. The
proposed insulation levels would result in 50% less heat loss than the existing levels and an annual
savings of $425.

Table 10-3 outlines the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with supplementing the wall
insulation levels at Erin Fire Station No. 50. The insulation will also reduce the buildings cooling load,
however due to many unknown variables it has not been factored into the savings and payback period.
Pinchin presents this option aware that it may lead to a loss of architectural character at the Site Building.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 31 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

We therefore recommend this retrofit to take place when/if building envelope repairs are required due to
the poor thermal performance (i.e. significant cracking).

Table 10-3 Summary of costs and savings associated with supplemental wall insulation at Erin
Fire Station No. 50

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

During building N/A 43 215 231,835 N/A 1078


envelope repairs

Incentive N/A

11.0 NON-FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

Pinchin has also reviewed the potential conservation measures with consideration to non-financial
benefits classified into the following:

1. Potential improvements to health and safety within the Site building.

2. Potential improvements to operational procedures within the Site building.

3. Potential improvements occupant comfort within the Site building.

All energy savings measures that Pinchin considered have been recommended in this report.

12.0 RECOMMENDED ITEMS FOR ASHRAE LEVEL III (CAPITAL GRADE) ENERGY AUDIT

Pinchin recommends a capital grade analysis of the following measures:

• VFDs at pumps and VSDs at motors (Recommendation 5.1)

o Model the reduction in corresponding energy savings.

• Supplemental Roof Insulation (Recommendation 10.2)

• Model the reduction in heat gain during the summer months and corresponding
energy savings.

• Supplemental Wall Insulation (Recommendation 10.3)

• Model the reduction in heat gain during the summer months and corresponding
energy savings.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 32 of 33


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II
October 16, 2019
2 Station Street, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

13.0 TERMS AND LIMITATIONS

This work was performed subject to the Terms and Limitations presented or referenced in the proposal for
this project.

Information provided by Pinchin is intended for Client use only. Pinchin will not provide results or
information to any party unless disclosure by Pinchin is required by law. Any use by a third party of
reports or documents authored by Pinchin or any reliance by a third party on or decisions made by a third
party based on the findings described in said documents, is the sole responsibility of such third parties.
Pinchin accepts no responsibility for damages suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or
actions conducted. No other warranties are implied or expressed.

The information provided in this report is based upon analysis of available documents, analytical results,
records and drawings, and personal contacts and interviews. In performing the assessment, Pinchin has
relied in good faith on information provided by the individuals noted in this report. Pinchin has assumed
that the documents, analytical results, records and drawings, and information provided by the individuals
noted in this report, including information provided in contacts and personal interviews, is factual and
accurate. Pinchin accepts no responsibility for any deficiency, misstatement or inaccuracy contained in
this report as a result of negligence, omissions, misinterpretations or fraudulent acts of persons
interviewed or contacted, or contained in reports that were reviewed, and makes no representation or
warranty as to the qualifications of any such persons or the reliability of information or reports provided by
them, whether or not such persons were introduced to the Client by Pinchin.

Pinchin did not attempt to identify locations of deposition of mould spores or particles, or minor mould
growth that would not exhibit any signs of spotting/staining on building materials. Pinchin would not be
able to identify locations of concealed mould growth within wall cavities and other hidden locations
without performing intrusive inspections. The degree of mould growth noted in the report may change with
time if water or humidity issues continue or develop after the assessment date(s). Any sources of water
infiltration or high humidity must be corrected to prevent the continuation or occurrence of mould growth.
Air sampling results (if any) will apply only to the time and conditions of the testing and may not be used
to reliably predict conditions on other days.
J:\241000s\0241444.000 TofErin,VariousSites,Erin,BSS,BCA\Deliverables\Energy Audits\Final Reports\Hillsburgh Fire Hall\241444, FINAL ASHRAE Level II EA, HFH, T of
Erin, 2 Station St., Hillsburgh, ON Oct 16, 2019 .docx

Template: Master Report for Energy Audit, BSS, July 3, 2018

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 33 of 33


APPENDIX I
Utility Bill Data
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Gas (m3)

Dec-16 28 3,337
Jan-17 32 3,938
Feb-17 31 3,621
Mar-17 28 2,990
Apr-17 33 2,320
May-17 32 1,673
Jun-17 27 72
Jul-17 31 20
Aug-17 32 50
Sep-17 31 99
Oct-17 30 692
Nov-17 29 3,070
Dec-17 29 3,293
Jan-18 33 4,225
Feb-18 30 3,842
Mar-18 28 3,674
Apr-18 32 3,541
May-18 31 1,003
Jun-18 31 55
Jul-18 29 55
Aug-18 31 72
Sep-18 31 88
Oct-18 30 1,485
Nov-18 30 3,133
Dec-18 31 3,610
Jan-19 30 4,877
Feb-19 33 4,580
Mar-19 28 4,059
Apr-19 30 2,417

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 3


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Electricity (kWh)
Date Duration (Days)
Meter # 2000 0577 0457
13-Jan-17 34 11,433
11-Feb-17 29 9,734
15-Mar-17 32 11,126
12-Apr-17 28 9,120
12-May-17 30 6,060
14-Jun-17 33 4,680
14-Jul-17 30 4,095
15-Aug-17 32 4,509
14-Sep-17 30 4,019
14-Oct-17 30 4,293
14-Nov-17 31 5,337
12-Dec-17 28 8,739
15-Jan-18 34 11,219
13-Feb-18 29 13,045
15-Mar-18 30 10,120
14-Apr-18 30 10,271
12-May-18 28 8,313
14-Jun-18 33 6,537
14-Jul-18 30 5,457
15-Aug-18 32 5,784
14-Sep-18 30 4,842
16-Oct-18 32 5,502
14-Nov-18 29 6,640
12-Dec-18 28 9,918
15-Jan-19 34 12,257
13-Feb-19 29 12,328
15-Mar-19 30 12,179
12-Apr-19 28 8,147

Electricity (kWh)
Date Duration (Days)
Meter # 2000 5949 9161
13-Jan-17 34 11,433

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 3


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Electricity (kWh)
Date Duration (Days)
Meter # 2000 5949 9161
13-Jul-17 30 76
14-Aug-17 32 76
14-Sep-17 31 76
13-Oct-17 29 76
13-Nov-17 31 76
12-Dec-17 29 76
12-Jan-18 31 76
12-Feb-18 31 76
15-Mar-18 31 76
13-Apr-18 29 76
12-May-18 29 76
14-Jun-18 33 76
13-Jul-18 29 76
14-Aug-18 32 76
13-Sep-18 30 76
16-Oct-18 33 76
13-Nov-18 28 76
11-Dec-18 28 76
14-Jan-19 34 76
13-Feb-19 30 76
14-Mar-19 29 76
11-Apr-19 28 76
4-May-19 23 76

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 3 of 3


APPENDIX II
Photographs
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

General view of vehicle exhaust extraction system in the truck bay.

Typical view of surface mounted light troffer with fluorescent lamps.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 2


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

View of redundant exhaust fan and the Price RTU located on the roof.

Typical view of programmable thermostat located in the meeting room.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 2


APPENDIX III
Mechanical Equipment List
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

*Assumed Value

Remaining
Unit Make Model # Output (HP) Cond. PUL Age
Lifespan

RTU - 1 Price AW-I-3-40 450,000 Btuh Good 25 8 17

RTU - 2 Lennox KGA092S4B 180,000 Btuh Good 25 8 17


M1Y

Electric FFH Unknown Unknown 3,000 W Good 15 8 7


#1

Electric FFH Unknown Unknown 1,500 W Good 15 8 7


(#2-#5)

Electric Ouellet Unknown 5,000 W Good 15 8 7


Suspended
UH

Electric BBH Unknown Unknown 750 W Good 15 8 7

IR Heater (1 - Reverber DX-2-60- 120,000 Btuh Good 18 8 10


3) ay 100N

DHW 1 Takagi 520 T-H2- 120,000 Btuh Fair - 12 6 6


DV-N Good

DHW 2 John JWC111-DV 120,000 Btuh Fair 12 8 4


Wood

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 2


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
HVAC Equipment List Appendix III

Pumps and Motors – Erin Fire Station No. 50


*Assumed Value

Remaining
Function Make Model Capacity PUL Age
Lifespan
Recirculation Unknown Unknown 10 W Fair to Poor* 10 8
Pump

Well Pump Unknown Unknown 1/2 HP Fair to Poor* 10 8

Compressor Unknown Unknown 1/2 HP Good 18 8

Ceiling Fans Unknown Unknown 120 W Good 20 8


(#1-#6)

EF - 1 Broan L700L 324 W Good 20 8

EF - 2 Broan DX90 120 W Good 20 8

EF - 3 Broan L250 264 W Good 20 8

EF - 4 Broan L150 168 W Good 20 8

EF - 5 Broan L700L 336 W Good 20 8

EF - 6 Broan L300 324 W Good 20 8

EF - 7 Nederman NCF80/20 10 HP Good 20 2*

EF - 8 Broan L900 456 W Good 20 8

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 2


APPENDIX IV
Ranking of Measures
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Ranking of Measures Appendix IV

Ranking of Measures

Annual Annual Annual Estimated


Annual Potential Estimated
Gas Cost GHG Estimated Grant
Section Recommendation Electrical Savings Payback
Savings Savings Savings Cost ($) Incentive
Savings (GJ) (%/year) (Years)
(GJ) ($) (Tonnes) ($)

4.1 Programmable 17.8 38.6 3,371 447 5% 0 0 0


Thermostats
Installation

7.2 Motion Controlled Light 4.9 374 151 0% 440 0 3


Switches

7.1 Lighting Retrofit 55.1 4,222 1,708 5% 18,900 1,984 10

4.6 RTU Replacement 7.9 71.4 4,321 603 7% 30,000 2,204 46

4.5 Drain Heat Recovery 21.3 1,110 107 2% 6,500 0 61


Retrofit

8.1 DG Window 4.4 35.0 2,160 313 3% 25,113 0 80


Replacement

8.2 TG Window 5.3 41.7 2,576 373 4% 32,879 0 88


Replacement

4.4 DHW Heater - 11.7 611 59 1% 15,000 2,326 215


Tankless Replacement

4.3 IR Tube Heater - Two 20.7 1,077 104 2% 30,000 0 289


Stage Replacement

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 1


APPENDIX V
Assumptions and Calculations
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

Calculating Current Loads:

Load Inventory

Assumptions (Based on observed data, drawings or similar products):

Assumed
Assumed input
Annual
Category Description Location Qty Power
Operating
Unit
Hours

Cooling RTU - 2 Roof 1 1337 7.5 Ton


DHW Recirculation 1 1566.726797 10 W
Pump
DHW Backwash 1 1566.726797 10 W
protective
Filter
DHW Water Filter 1 1566.726797 173 W
system
DHW Well Pump Mechanical Bay 1 1566.726797 1 HP
DHW Compressor Mechanical Bay 1 1566.726797 1 HP
DHW DHW - 1 1 709.9735767 199,000 Btuh
DHW DHW - 2 1 709.9735767 199,900 Btuh
Heating Portable Gym 1 365 1,500 W
Heater
Heating Electric FFH 1 1354.730002 3,000 W
(#1)
Heating Electric FFH 4 1354.730002 1,500 W
(#2-#5)
Heating Electric Bunker Room 1 1354.730002 5,000 W
Suspended
UH
Heating Electric BBH Electrical Bay 1 1354.730002 750 W
Heating RTU - 1 Truck Bay 1 580.0695501 450,000 Btuh
Heating RTU - 2 Truck Bay 1 580.0695501 180,000 Btuh
Heating IR Heater (1 Truck Bay 3 580.0695501 100,000 Btuh
- 3)
Kitchen Toaster EMS Crew Room - 1 547.5 1,500 W
Oven Kitchen
Kitchen Stove Kitchen 1 91.25 1,421 W
Kitchen Kettle Kitchen 2 52 180 W
Kitchen Fridge Throughout 2 8760 690 W
Kitchen Microwave Kitchen 2 365 900 W

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 5 of 5


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

Kitchen Coffee Kitchen 2 52 900 W


Maker
Kitchen BBQ (NG) 1 4 50,000 Btuh
Plug Load DVD Player EMS Crew Room 1 20 16 W
Plug Load Punch Clock EMS Crew Room 1 365 4 W
Plug Load Security EMS Crew Room 1 365 40 W
System
Plug Load Internet EMS Crew Room 1 365 20 W
Modem
Plug Load TV Throughout 2 20 115 W
Plug Load Speakers Fire Services Room 2 365 240 W
Plug Load Projector Fire Services Room 1 200 300 W
Plug Load Laptop Fire Services Room 1 2912 45 W
Plug Load Computer Throughout 3 2912 30 W
Plug Load Monitor Throughout 3 2912 180 W
Plug Load Shredder Throughout 2 10 70 W
Plug Load Printer Throughout 2 8760 44 W
(small)
Plug Load Radio Communications Room 1 96 400 W
Plug Load Phone Throughout 6 8760 2 W
Plug Load Base Station Communications Room 1 8760 100 W
Radio
Plug Load Battery Offices 2 8760 10 W
Charger
Plug Load CO Detector Truck Bay 1 8760 104 W
Plug Load Garage Door Truck Bay 3 20 1 HP
Openers
Plug Load Treadmill Gym 2 365 1,440 W
Plug Load Stair Master Gym 1 365 58 W
Plug Load Elliptical Gym 1 365 650 W
Ventilation Hood fan Kitchen 1 52 1 HP
Ventilation Ceiling Fans 6 1566.726797 120 W
Ventilation EF - 1 1 1566.726797 324 W
Ventilation EF - 2 1 1566.726797 120 W
Ventilation EF - 3 1 1566.726797 264 W
Ventilation EF - 4 1 1566.726797 168 W
Ventilation EF - 5 1 1566.726797 336 W
Ventilation EF - 6 1 1566.726797 324 W
Ventilation EF - 7 1 1566.726797 10 HP
Ventilation EF - 8 1 1566.726797 456 W

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 5 of 5


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

• Sample Calculation:
8 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 5 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 52 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 30 𝑊𝑊
𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 = 7 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 × × × ×
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶
Cooling Loads

• Assumptions:
• Cooling is required only during event times, approximately 24 hours a year

• Sample Calculation:
12,000 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏ℎ
7.5 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 ×
𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 = 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 × 1337 ℎ𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜
11.2 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
Individual Mechanical Equipment Loads

• Assumptions:

• All equipment loads with unknown operating hours will operate with equal proportion, except
heating.

• Heating equipment only operates during heating season, as determined by the portion of
Brampton HDDs from 2017 to 2018 (i.e. 94%).

• The portion of the energy that a piece of equipment uses is equal to its demand multiplied by
the seasonal proportion of their use and divided by the sum of all demands using that same
utility (gas/electric) whose annual loads do not have assumed operating hours (i.e. lighting,
elevators, standalone coolers and freezers and office equipment plug loads).

• The portion of the energy that a piece of non-seasonal equipment uses is equal to its demand
divided by the sum of all non-seasonal equipment demands using that same utility
(gas/electric) whose annual loads are have NOT known/previously assumed, multiplied by
100% subtracted by the sum of all seasonal proportions for the corresponding utility

• The overall energy use is equal to the calculated portion of energy consumption for a piece of
equipment multiplied by the annual average for the corresponding utility.

Energy Conservation Recommendations

Program Thermostats

• Assumptions:
• 3% reduction in cooling energy consumption for every Fahrenheit degree the thermostat is
increased.

• Programmable thermostats have historically been set to 68°F in the summer and 68°F in the
winter.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 5 of 5


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

• The new thermostat program will involve increasing the cooling set point to 78°F and
increasing the cooling setback to 85°F.

• The new thermostat program will involve reducing the heating setback to 65°F degrees.

• The total annual cooling load is 39 GJ and the heating load is 643 GJ.

• Calculation:
8 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 16 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = �� × (68°F − 78°F ) × 3%� + � × (68°F − 85°F ) × 3%��
24 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 24 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
× 39 𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺
14 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 10 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
+ �� × (68°F − 68°F ) × 3%� + � × (68°F − 65°F ) × 3%��
24 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 24 ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
× 643 𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺
IR Tube Heater – 2 Stage Replacement

• Assumptions:
• Retrofit will improve reduce IR Tube heating demand by 12%

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 12% × 173 𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺

RTU Replacement

• Assumptions:
• New RTU will have an EER of 18.

• The Thermostat program is already in place and reducing the heating energy from the RTU
by 15% and the cooling energy by 39%.

• The unit will be resized to achieve the existing output with a lower input.

• Calculation:

18 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 × 𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑄𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × (1 − 39% 𝑇𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 ) × �1 − ∑ 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸.𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖
� × �1 +

∑ 𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸.𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖

∑ 18 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁
∑ 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸.𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖
� + 𝑅𝑅𝑇𝑇𝑈𝑈𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × (1 − 6% 𝑇𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 ) × (𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 −

𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸. 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 ) × �1 + �
𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

Drain Heat Recovery Retrofit

• Assumptions:

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 5 of 5


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level II October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix III

• Retrofit will improve reduce DHW heating demand by 14%

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 12% × 150 𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺
DHW heater Replacement

• Assumptions:
• Two Existing DHW heaters have an efficiency of 91-93%.

• New DHW heaters will have an efficiency of 96%.

• The energy input of the new DHW will be lower in relation to the improved efficiency (will
preserving the existing output).

• The Drain Heat Recovery Retrofit is already in place and reducing the energy from the DHW
heaters by 14%.

• Calculation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶. × (1 − 14%𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 ) × (𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 − 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸. 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 ) ×
𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁
�1 + �
𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸

Building Envelope Heat Loss

• Calculation:
24ℎ𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 (𝑊𝑊) = 𝑈𝑈 × 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 × 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻 ×
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 5 of 5


FINAL
Energy Audit -
ASHRAE Level I
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario

Prepared for:

Town of Erin
Town of Erin
Hillsburgh, ON N0B 1Z0

Attention: Ursula D’Angelo


Director of Finance

October 16, 2019

Pinchin File: 241444

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd.


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Issued to: Town of Erin


Contact: Ursula D’Angelo
Director of Finance
Issued on: October 16, 2019
Pinchin File: 241444
Issuing Office: Mississauga, ON
Primary Pinchin Contact: Melissa Anastacio , Senior Project
Manager, 905.363.1434,
manastacio@pinchin.com

Author: Carleen Lawson, MBSc Candidate


Project Technologist
289.971.7431
clawson@pinchin.com

Reviewer: Paul Frasie, M.Eng., P.Eng., LEED Green Associate


Senior Project Manager
905.363.1457
pfrasie@pinchin.com

Reviewer: Mr. Ahmed Alyousif, PhD. P.Eng.


Director, Building Science and Sustainability
905.363.1459
aalyousif@pinchin.com

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page i


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Pinchin Ltd. (Pinchin) was retained by Town of Erin to conduct an energy audit of The Municipal Office
located at 5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario.

The purpose of the energy audits is to identify how energy is used on site and how to maximize available
funds across the best energy reduction measures. To achieve the greatest energy reduction, the Client
would like to implement a series of energy reduction measures (ECMs).

This report provides an analysis of historical energy data at the Town of Erin building located at 5684
Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario, to determine the effects of weather, billing abnormalities and analyze
current energy and water systems. Energy consumption data is summarized by end use such as lighting,
heating, cooling, ventilation and plug loads. Energy reduction measures for the subject building are
summarized based on the information gathered during Pinchin’s facility audit and information provided by
the client.

Annual Annual Annual Annual Est.


Potential Est.
Electrical Gas GHG Cost Est. Grant
Section Recommendation
Savings Saving Savings Savings
Savings
Cost ($) Incentive
Payback
(%) (Yrs.)
(GJ) s (GJ) (Kg) ($) ($)
Programmable 7.4 13.6
4.1 Thermostats (2,069 (366 798 279 5% - - -
Installation kWh) m3)
Occupant & 6
4.2 Humidity (1,667 - 1,615 186 1% 1,500 - 8
Controlled Fans kWh)
21.1
Energy Star
4.4 (5,852 - 4,602 654 5% 6,000 - 9
Equipment kWh)
60.0
5.1 Lighting Retrofit (16,673 - 367 1,862 15% 21,950 2,164 10.6
kWh)
Motion Controlled 4.8 (1,329
5.2 kWh)
- 367 148 1% 825 - 5.6
Light Switches

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page ii


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
Facility Overview................................................................................................................... 1
Building Operations .............................................................................................................. 2
2.0 UTILITY INFORMATION.................................................................................................................. 2
Annual Utility Cost Breakdown ............................................................................................. 3
Energy Consumption ............................................................................................................ 3
2.2.1 Energy Consumption Summary ................................................................................... 3
2.2.2 Energy Consumption Analysis ..................................................................................... 5
3.0 ENERGY CONSUMPTION BENCHMARKING ............................................................................... 8
Introduction to Energy Use Intensity .................................................................................... 8
Energy Use Intensity Analysis .............................................................................................. 8
Actual Energy Use Breakdown ............................................................................................. 9
4.0 SUMMARY OF ENERGY USING EQUIPMENT ........................................................................... 10
Space Heating, Cooling, and Ventilation ............................................................................ 10
Plumbing ............................................................................................................................. 12
Lighting ............................................................................................................................... 12
Plug Load............................................................................................................................ 13
5.0 ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ..................................................................................... 13
Program Thermostats ......................................................................................................... 13
Connect Bathroom Fans to Humidity Sensors ................................................................... 14
Energy Star Plug Load Equipment ..................................................................................... 15
Light Fixture Retrofit ........................................................................................................... 15
Motion Controlled Light Switch Installation ......................................................................... 16
Installation of Sub-meters on the major HVAC equipment. ................................................ 17
6.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 17
7.0 RECOMMENDED ITEMS FOR ASHRAE LEVEL II (CAPITAL GRADE) ENERGY AUDIT.......... 18
8.0 TERMS AND LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................... 19

PPENDICES

APPENDIX I Utility Bill Data


APPENDIX II Photographs

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page iii


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1: Building Characteristics ............................................................................................... 2


Table 3-1 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for The Municipal Office ................................................. 9
Table 4-1 Major HVAC Equipment in Use at The Municipal Office ............................................. 10
Table 4-2: Summary of Roof Top Units ...................................................................................... 11
Table 4-3: Summary of Lighting Fixtures on Site ........................................................................ 12
Table 5-1 Proposed Set Points for the Programmable Thermostats at The Municipal Office..... 13
Table 5-2 Summary of Costs and Savings Associated with the Installation of Programmable
Thermostats at The Municipal Office .......................................................................................... 14
Table 5-3 Summary of Costs and Savings Associated with Occupant & Humidity Sensor
Controlled Fans Switches at The Municipal Office ..................................................................... 15
Table 5-4 Summary of Costs and Savings Associated with Energy Star Plug Load Equipment at
The Municipal Office ................................................................................................................... 15
Table 5-5 Summary of Costs and Savings Associated with Lighting Retrofit at The Municipal
Office........................................................................................................................................... 16
Table 5-6 Summary of Costs and Savings Associated with Motion Controlled Light Switch
installation at The Municipal Office ............................................................................................. 17

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2-1 Breakdown of Average Annual Utility Costs ................................................................ 3


Figure 2-2: Annual Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of The Municipal Office ......... 4
Figure 2-3: Monthly Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of The Municipal Office........ 4
Figure 2-4 Electricity and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis ........................................... 5
Figure 2-5: Electricity and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis .......................................... 6
Figure 2-6: Natural Gas and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis ...................................... 6
Figure 2-7: Natural Gas and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis....................................... 7
Figure 2-8: Electricity Consumption and Cooling Degree Days .................................................... 7
Figure 3-1 EUI Comparison between The Municipal Office and ASHRAE EUI Target ................. 8
Figure 3-2 Ideal Energy Breakdown in an Office Building ............................................................ 9

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page iv


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Pinchin Ltd. (Pinchin) was retained by Ursula D’Angelo, Director of Finance at Town of Erin to conduct an
ASHRAE Level I Energy Audit of The Municipal Office located at 5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario.

The purpose of the energy audit to is identify how energy is used on site and how to maximize available
funds across the best energy reduction measures. To achieve the greatest energy reduction, the Client
would like to implement a series of energy reduction measures (ECMs).

The audit was conducted by Pinchin assessors, Carleen Lawson and Raven Cote, on July 3rd at which
time Pinchin interviewed and was accompanied by the Building Manager, hereinafter refer to as the “Site
Representative”.

Cost estimates provided in this report are preliminary Class “D” and provided only as an indication of the
order of magnitude of the remedial work. These values have been arrived at by determining a
representative quantity from the visual observations made at the time of our Site visit and by applying
current market value unit costs to such quantities and or a reasonable lump sum allowance for the work.
More precise cost estimates would require more detailed investigation to define the scope of work. They
are not intended to warrant that the final costs will not exceed these amounts or that all costs are
covered. The estimates assume the work is performed at one time and do not include costs for potential
de-mobilization and re-mobilization if repairs/replacement are spread out over the term of analysis.

All costs are identified in 2018 Canadian Dollars, including a 20% contingency fee to cover unforeseen
costs. Repair/replacement cost estimates are accurate to +/- 50%.

All cost estimates assume that regular annual maintenance and repairs will be performed to all building
elements at the facility. No cost allowance is carried for this regular maintenance.

The cost estimates provided in this report are based on costs of past repairs at similar buildings, recent
costing data such as “RS Means” and “Hanscomb’s Yardsticks for Costing”, or Pinchin’s professional
judgment.

Energy Savings and Demand Savings provided in this report are estimated to an accuracy of +/- 30%

This report satisfies all requirements an ASHRAE Level I Energy Audit as stated by the ASHRAE-D-
90450 Procedures for Commercial Building Energy Audits (2nd Edition).

Facility Overview

Table 1-1 provides a summary of the building use and construction.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 1-1: Building Characteristics

Building Age 25 years (Construction circa 1994);


Ownership Status Owned by Town of Erin

Utility Data Electricity – Hydro One, Gas – Enbridge, Water – Town of Erin
Gross Floor Area 1,140 m2 (12,266 ft2)
Building Type Office
Occupied Hours ~ 45 hours/week
Regular Occupancy ~20 fulltime equivalent staff
Roof System Sloped metal roof
Wall System Brick masonry cladding
Windows Insulated glazed, aluminum framed windows;

Building Operations

A solid understanding of building operations and occupancy allows building owners to assess the varying
power and ventilation loads and improve the efficiency of energy using systems. The Site Building is
comprised of 1,140 m2 of office space. The building operates as the Town hall.

The office is open year-round, Monday to Friday, 8:30am to 4pm as well as from 6pm-9pm once a week
for council meetings. The Site Representative informed Pinchin that there are 20 full-time equivalent staff
who primarily work from 8:20am to 4pm, year-round and approximately 30 occupants during the council
meetings.

2.0 UTILITY INFORMATION

The Municipal Office makes use of electricity, natural gas, propane and water. Monthly electricity data
consumption data was provided for January 2017 to May 2019. Natural gas data was provided for the
period of December 2016 to June 2019.

The date range for the various utilities do not align with each other. For an energy audit it is important to
be able to compare utility data for the same months; therefor, Pinchin will only analyze data from January
2017 to December 2018.

The utility consumption tables have been provided in Appendix I of the report.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Annual Utility Cost Breakdown

Analyzing annual costs of utilities is essential to prioritizing energy conservation measures. Figure 2-1
shows a breakdown of the average annual utility costs at The Municipal Office. Electricity consumption
accounts for 91% ($17,777) of annual utility costs and natural gas accounts for 9% ($1,786). Electricity
consumption is assumed to be higher than natural gas as it is associated with a greater range of
applications such as the cooling, ventilation, lighting and plug loads. The combined average annual cost
for all utilities is $19,563. Pinchin has identified conservation measures for each utility which will be
discussed in later sections of the report.

Figure 2-1 Breakdown of Average Annual Utility Costs


Natural Gas,
$1,786 , 9%

Electricity,
$17,777 , 91%

Energy Consumption

2.2.1 Energy Consumption Summary

On-site energy is provided by electricity and natural gas for the Site Building. Figure 2-2 provides a
summary of annual electricity, natural gas and total energy consumption for the period from 2017 to 2018
for The Municipal Office.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 3 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-2: Annual Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of The Municipal Office

Average
Year

2018

2017

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450


Energy Consumption (GJ)
Total Natural Gas Electricity

Figure 2-3 shows the monthly electricity and natural gas consumption, both converted to gigajoules to
allow for comparability, from January 2017 to December 2018. The building has a combination of electric
and gas-fired heat sources, which can be seen by the annual peak in consumption from January to
March.

Figure 2-3: Monthly Electricity and Natural Gas Consumption (GJ) of The Municipal Office

40
35
Energy Consumption (GJ)

30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Nov-17

Nov-18
Apr-17
May-17

Jul-17
Aug-17

Oct-17

Apr-18
May-18

Jul-18
Aug-18

Oct-18

Dec-18
Feb-17

Sep-17

Dec-17

Feb-18
Jan-17

Mar-17

Jun-17

Jan-18

Mar-18

Jun-18

Sep-18

Month
Electricity (GJ) Gas (GJ)

Electricity is used on Site for supplemental heating, cooling, ventilation, lighting and plug loads. The
average monthly consumption is 25 GJ. The seasonal averages were compared, with the summer having
the highest average with 27.4 GJ and spring having the lowest average with 24.2 GJ. The summer
electricity consumption was 14% higher than the spring consumption. This reflects the operation of the
cooling system during the summer months which increases the electricity consumption.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 4 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Natural gas is used on Site for space heating and domestic hot water heating. The average monthly
consumption is 98 GJ. The seasonal averages were compared, with the winter having the highest
average with 16.5 GJ and summer having the lowest average with 1.7 GJ. The winter natural gas
consumption was 10 times higher than the summer consumption. This is as expected as space heating
and domestic hot water heating is required less during the summer season.

2.2.2 Energy Consumption Analysis

To determine the effects of weather, two regression analyses were performed each for electricity
consumption and natural gas consumption in relation to heating degree days (HDD) and cooling degree
days (CDD). The climate data used was referenced from Historical Climate Data (2019). The first two
analyses looked at the relationship between electricity consumption, heating degree days and cooling
degree days. 1 The correlation between consumption and HDD/CDD is expressed as the displayed value
of R2. Essentially, this represents the amount of energy used per increase in heating/cooling degree day.
The R2 value does not in any way represent how efficiently the system operates. The results in Figure 2-4
and Figure 2-5 show a weak linear relationship between HDD and electricity consumption and a
moderate to weak linear relationship between electricity consumption and CDD. The results indicate that
the electricity use is mostly directed to base loads in the building.

Figure 2-4 Electricity and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis

Electricity Consumption Vs HDD


35.0
y = -0.0045x + 26.749
Electricity Consumption

30.0 R² = 0.1964
25.0
20.0
(GJ)

15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
HDD

1
A heating degree day is defined as the number of degrees that a day's average temperature is below 18°. If the average outdoor
temperature is 5°C, the corresponding HDD would be 18°C - 5°C = 13°C.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 5 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-5: Electricity and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis

Electricity Consumption Vs CDD


35.0
Electricity Consumption (GJ)

30.0
25.0 y = 0.05x + 24.256
20.0 R² = 0.3873
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
CDD

The next two analyses’ looked at the relationship between natural gas consumption, heating degree days
and cooling degree days. On a scale of 0% to 100%, the relation between gas consumption and HDD in
Figure 2-6 can be expressed as 94%, which indicates a strong correlation. The results are
understandable as natural gas is used to for space heating and domestic hot water heating. The results in
Figure 2-7 show a moderate negetive linear relationship between warm outdoor temperatures and natural
gas consumption. This is expected as natural gas use is reduced in the warmer weather.

Figure 2-6: Natural Gas and Heating Degree Day Regression Analysis

Gas Consumption Vs HDD


200.0
Gas Consumption (GJ)

150.0

100.0
y = 0.2102x + 1.2051
R² = 0.9369
50.0

0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
HDD

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 6 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Figure 2-7: Natural Gas and Cooling Degree Day Regression Analysis

Gas Consumption Vs CDD


200.0
Gas Consumption (GJ)

150.0

100.0 y = -1.4678x + 106.56


R² = 0.6279

50.0

0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
CDD

The regression analysis for electricity and cooling degree days indicates that cooling is not a significant
source of electricity use and is small in comparison to the natural gas heating.

Figure 2-8 shows the relationship between electricity consumption, natural gas consumption, HDDs and
CDDs on a monthly basis. The graph illustrates a rise in electricity consumption accompanying a rise in
HDDs.

Figure 2-8: Electricity Consumption and Cooling Degree Days

40.0 900
35.0 800
Energy Consumption (GJ)

30.0 700
600
HDD & CDD
25.0
500
20.0
400
15.0
300
10.0 200
5.0 100
0.0 0
Nov-17

Nov-18
Apr-17
May-17

Jul-17

Jul-18
Aug-17

Oct-17

Apr-18
May-18

Aug-18

Oct-18
Feb-17

Sep-17

Dec-17

Feb-18

Sep-18

Dec-18
Jan-17

Mar-17

Jun-17

Jan-18

Mar-18

Jun-18

Months
Electricity (GJ) Gas (GJ) HDD CDD

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 7 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

3.0 ENERGY CONSUMPTION BENCHMARKING

Introduction to Energy Use Intensity

Energy use intensity (EUI) is a standard metric for energy consumption in buildings. The EUI is calculated
as a buildings annual energy consumption divided by its gross floor area. Normalizing the energy usage
for area allows for comparison between buildings and indicates relative performance.

The EUI is a limited metric as it is not normalized for other building characteristics such as climate zone.
To account for this limitation, the report will refer to ASHRAE Standard 100-2015 Energy target which
factors in building activity type, occupancy and climate zone. The targets “represent the 25th bottom (low
energy) percentile of energy use by each building category” 2. The ASHRAE energy target for The
Municipal Office was determined to be 0.78 GJ/m2/year. Please refer to Appendix V for the assumptions
and calculations.

Energy Use Intensity Analysis

On average, from 2017 to 2018 The Municipal Office consumed 303 GJ of electricity and 98 GJ of natural
gas. This amounts to approximately 401 GJ of annual energy consumption. The gross floor area is
approximately 1,140 m2 (12,266 sf). The resulting EUI is therefore 0.35 GJ/m2/yr. The calculated EUI is
54% lower than the ASHRAE energy target of 0.76 GJ/m2/yr.

Figure 3-1 EUI Comparison between The Municipal Office and ASHRAE EUI Target

0.80

0.70 0.76
Energy Usage Intensity (GJ/m2/year)

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30 0.35

0.20

0.10

-
Site Building (Current EUI) ASHRAE Target EUI

2
ASHRAE Standard 100-2015

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 8 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Actual Energy Use Breakdown

Pinchin generated an energy use breakdown for The Municipal Office using a breakdown of an ideal
office building in Canada (Refer to Figure 3-2 3). Energy in an office building is dominantly used by the
space heating, cooling, plug loads and lighting systems. Recommended retrofits will be focused on these
areas to best improve the Site’s overall energy efficiency and lower utility costs.

Figure 3-2 Ideal Energy Breakdown in an Office Building

Pumps Other
3% 1%

Cooling
7%
Fans
8%
Heating
38%

Equipment
21%

Lighting
22%

Heating Lighting Equipment Fans Cooling Pumps Other

Table 3-1 Energy Use Breakdown (GJ) for The Municipal Office

System Assumed Energy Consumption (GJ) Percentage

Heating 152.5 38%

Cooling 28.1 7%

Ventilation 32.1 8%

Lighting 88.3 22%

Plug Load 84.3 21%

3
REALpac Energy Benchmarking Program Database Input Guidelines, REALpac, 2015

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 9 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Pumps 12.0 3%

Other 49.9 1%

4.0 SUMMARY OF ENERGY USING EQUIPMENT

Space Heating, Cooling, and Ventilation

Primary heating for the Site Building is provided by three (3) gas-fired furnaces located in the mechanical
room of the building with air distributed via system of ductwork and air diffusers. Two (2) of the furnace
units are manufactured by “Lennox” and one (1) unit is manufactured by “Heil”. The forced air furnaces
are equipped with a heat recovery ventilator (HRV) located in the mechanical room.

Primarily cooling for the Site Building is provided by four (4) electric air conditioning units. The external
units are located on the West portion of the Site.

The Site Building’s exhaust system consists of various exhaust fans for the washrooms, and some
common areas. The exhaust fans are vented to the atmosphere through the exterior walls. The fans were
observed to be in serviceable condition.

The furnaces and air conditioners are controlled using a programmable wall mounted thermostat located
in each zone. Programmable thermostats increase the ease for ECMs, such as temperature setbacks, to
be implemented within the facility.

The major HVAC equipment installed at The Municipal Office is listed in Table 4-1.

Table 4-1 Major HVAC Equipment in Use at The Municipal Office

Make Model # Heating Input Cooling Output Function Condition


Space Heating -
Lennox Unknown 75,000 Btuh Fair
Furnace
Space Heating -
Lennox - 125,000 Btuh Fair
Furnace
Space Heating -
Heil NTGM075EGA3 125,000 Btuh Fair
Furnace
Lennox HS29-018-1P 1.5 Ton Fair
ICP KSSE24GA2 Unknown Fair
10ACC-042-230-
Lennox 4 Ton Fair
03
Lennox Unknown Unknown Fair
Space Heating –
Wescan 3994B 1500 W Fair
Forced Flow Heater
Space Heating –
Unknown Unknown 1300 W Fair
Forced Flow Heater

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 10 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

A summary of the Roof Top Units is listed below in Table 4-2.


Table 4-2: Summary of Roof Top Units

Rated Heating Input Supply Fan Return Fan


Unit ID Manufacturer
MBH HP CFM HP CFM

electric heater - 50
A/C - 1 Trane - - 30 -
kW

electric heater - 50
A/C - 2 Trane - - 30 -
kW

A/C - 3 McQuay 300 7.5 - 1 -

A/C - 4 McQuay 300 7.5 - 1 -

A/C - 5 McQuay 300 7.5 - 1 -

A/C - 6 McQuay 300 7.5 - 1 -

A/C - 7 Daikin 400 10 - 1/3 -

A/C - 10 Trane 250 - - - -

A/C - 11 Trane - 10 - 3 -

A/C - 15 Valent - 3 - 1.5 -

A/C - 16 Valent - 3 - 1.5 -

A/C - 17 McQuay 225 3 - 1/3 -

A/C - 18 McQuay 300 7.5 - 1 -

A/C - 19 McQuay 300 7.5 - 1 -

MUA-1 Engineered Air 800 7.5 6,000 - -

Note: The above data is the only available information from the site mechanical equipment units’ labels.
Pinchin did not receive any other information such as equipment schedules or mechanical drawings.
Thus, Pinchin recommends carrying out an air balancing assessment for the entire mechanical equipment
(i.e., air flow, HP, voltage, year, condition, etc.). Following an air balancing assessment, Pinchin will
update the above information.

Each RTU is responsible for maintaining a supply air temperature set point and controlling the quantity of
outdoor air. The supply air temperature set point is based on an outdoor air setback (the warmer the

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 11 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

outdoor temperature, the cooler the supply air set point). The quantity of outdoor air is determined by the
outdoor air, mixed air and exhaust air damper positions.

In addition to the RTUs, there are thirteen (13) roof mounted exhaust fans in the Site Building that service
washrooms, kitchens, and utility rooms requiring air extraction.

During the site visit, the majority of the fan motors were observed to be standard efficiency. There is an
opportunity to install NEMA Premium Efficiency motors on all exhaust fans when the existing motors
reach the end of their Projected Useful Life (PUL).

There is an energy savings opportunity to install Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs) on the RTUs when
the existing RTUs reach the end of PUL. Additional investigation and pre-design review is required to
provide a more accurate energy savings analysis.

Extra cooling for spaces such as IT Rooms is provided by nine (9) heat pumps that consist of outdoor
condensers and indoor evaporators.

Auxiliary cooling is provided by nine (9) heat pumps. These units provide cooling to elevator rooms and IT
rooms. Generally speaking, this system is capable of minimum efficiency of 20.5 Seasonal Energy
Efficiency Rating (SEER).

Plumbing

Domestic hot water (DHW) for the Site Building is provided by electric standalone “Giant” DHW heater
located in a mechanical room within the basement level of the building. The unit was noted to have been
manufactured by “Giant” in 2008 (i.e. approximately 11 years old) and possesses a storage capacity of
39.8 Gallons.

Lighting

Lighting in the Site Building is provided by a combination of linear fluorescent and fluorescent and
halogen pot lights. Table 4-3 below summarizes the type and quantity of lights observed in the Site
Building.

Table 4-3: Summary of Lighting Fixtures on Site

# of Fixtures
Wattage Lamps per Demand
Type
per Lamp Fixture Interior Exterior (kW)

2' x 4' Surface Mount Fluorescent T8 32 3 12 1.15

1' x 4' Surface Mount Fluorescent T8 32 2 64 4.10

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 12 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

# of Fixtures
Wattage Lamps per Demand
Type
per Lamp Fixture Interior Exterior (kW)

1' x 4' Surface Mount Fluorescent T8 32 2 20 1.28

Fluorescent Pot Light 25 2 3 0.15

Eyeball Halogen Par 16 50 1 13 0.65

HPS Pot Light 70 1 15 1.05

HPS Wall Pack 150 1 6 0.90

Total Demand 9

Note: The wattage per lamp was assumed to be 32W with 2 lamps per 2’ x 4’ fixture.

The lights in the Site Building are controlled manually and are turned off at night.

Plug Load

Plug load generally includes equipment installed in the building that allows the tenant to perform their
primary business function. Some of the plug load items are directly related such as servers, computers
and photocopiers, while other plug load items provide the work associated with the manufacturing area,
where Pinchin did not have access.

5.0 ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES

After visiting the site and reviewing the information, there are several potential energy initiatives that the
Client can take to save energy at the site. No low or no-cost measures to reduce energy consumption
were identified during the review, though several capital improvement or incremental costs were
identified. These measures are presented in the following sections.

Program Thermostats

The HVAC equipment is controlled by programmable thermostats. The existing thermostat schedule, as
observed during the site visit, along with the new proposed set points listed in Table 5-1:

Table 5-1 Proposed Set Points for the Programmable Thermostats at The Municipal Office

Existing Setpoint Proposed Setpoint Existing Setback Proposed Setback

Summer 23.9°C (75°F) 25.6°C (78°F) 24.4°C (76°F) 29.4°C (85°F)

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 13 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Winter 22.2°C (72°F) 20°C (68 °F) 18.3°C (65°F) 18.3°C (65°F)

Each degree Fahrenheit raised in the summer or lowered in the winter represents up to 3% of energy
savings. Based on our observations, Pinchin assumed that the Site Building can reduce its winter setpoint
by 2.2 °C (5 °F), raise its summer setback by 5°C (9°F) and raise its summer set point by 1.6°C (3°F).
The summary of the costs and savings associated with the programmable thermostats is shown in Table
5-2.

Table 5-2 Summary of Costs and Savings Associated with the Installation of Programmable
Thermostats at The Municipal Office

Annual
Demand Annual System Incentives Simple
Energy
Implement Reduction Savings Cost Available Payback
Savings
(GJ) ($) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.002 17.1 280 N/A N/A Immediate

Incentive Details N/A

Note: The above assumptions are contingent on revised occupant behaviour as the occupants control the
thermostats.

Connect Bathroom Fans to Humidity Sensors

The existing bathroom fans at The Municipal Office are user controlled. If occupants do not turn on fans
when appropriate, humidity may accumulate within the room, leading to mould growth and an unhealthy
environment. Insufficient ventilation also leads to odour build up which can result in an uncomfortable
environment. Conversely, if a fan is left on by an occupant as they leave the room, it may run longer than
required resulting in unnecessary energy consumption and higher utility bills. Pinchin recommends
connecting the bathroom fans to occupancy sensors to ensure the fans only operate long enough to
provide sufficient ventilation after an occupant uses the washroom.

Pinchin recommends installing high efficiency energy star exhaust fans, which will use approximately
89% less energy. The summary of the costs and savings associated with the exhaust fans is shown in
Table 5-3.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 14 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 5-3 Summary of Costs and Savings Associated with Occupant & Humidity Sensor
Controlled Fans Switches at The Municipal Office

Annual Annual
Demand Incentives Simple
Energy Energy and System
Implement Reduction Available Payback
Savings Maintenance Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) (years)
(GJ) Savings ($)

At end of PUL N/A 6 53 1,500 0 7

Incentive Details N/A

Note: Assumes the existing fans are 60 W at 50 CFM and the replacement fans will use 11 W at 50 CFM.

Energy Star Plug Load Equipment

During our Site review, Pinchin noted that approximately half of the plug loads reviewed did not display
energy star logos. Converting to energy star appliances and office equipment can reduce the energy
consumption by up to 50%. In addition, Pinchin recommends installing timer-controlled power bars to
reduce stand by losses. The summary of the costs and savings associated with the timer-controlled
power bars is shown in Table 5-4.

Table 5-4 Summary of Costs and Savings Associated with Energy Star Plug Load Equipment at
The Municipal Office

Annual Annual
Demand Incentives Simple
Energy Energy and System
Implement Reduction Available Payback
Savings Maintenance Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) (years)
(GJ) Savings ($)

At end of PUL N/A 21.1 650 6,000 9

Incentive Details N/A

Note: The system cost is the additional cost to purchase an energy star model when replacing office
equipment upon the end of its PUL

Light Fixture Retrofit

The majority of interior lighting at the Site Building is assumed to be a mix of fluorescent and HPS lamps.

While the fluorescent T8s are efficient compared to older T12 lights, modern LED T8s are 63% more
efficient than the equivalent fluorescent lamp [going from 32 W to 12W]. The LED pot lights are
approximately 88% more efficient than their halogen Par 16 counterparts and 44% more efficient than
their CFL counterparts.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 15 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

The LED retrofit will allow for less maintenance due to their improved longevity when compared to
fluorescent and incandescent fixtures. As the cost and lifespan of fixtures will fluctuate, the payback
period will not factor in maintenance related savings. Pinchin does not expect comfort/health benefits to
be obtained.

As outlined in Figure 5-1, the recommended improvements to the lighting system are expected to reduce
annual electricity consumption by up to 60 GJ, and the power demand by up to 0.05 GJ. These
reductions translate to $1,862 in annual savings. Table 5-4 outlines the estimated costs, savings and
incentives associated with implementing the recommended lighting upgrades at The Municipal Office.
The summary of the costs and savings associated with the lighting retrofit is shown in Table 5-5.

Table 5-5 Summary of Costs and Savings Associated with Lighting Retrofit at The Municipal Office

Annual
Demand Annual System Incentives
Energy Simple Payback
Implement Reduction Savings Cost Available
Savings (years)
(GJ) ($) ($) ($)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.02 60 1,862 21,950 2,164 11

Incentive Details IESO “Small Business Lighting Program”: $2000

Note: Assumes an average of 2.34 daily operating hours for closet and storage room lighting (5 days a
week), 8 hours for office and common area lighting (5 days a week) and 12 hours for exterior lighting (7
days a week).

Motion Controlled Light Switch Installation

The lighting systems at The Municipal Office are generally user controlled with the exception of motion-
controlled lighting in the basement and first floor bathrooms. Pinchin recommends installing more motion
detecting light switches to control the lighting throughout the entire building. The motion detectors reduce
energy loss due to lights being left on in unoccupied rooms. One demerit of motion controlled light
switches is that they will continue operation of the lighting system for 90 seconds after the occupant has
left the area. These systems also consume energy 24/7 to remain in standby mode.

Table 5-6 outlines the estimated costs, savings and incentives associated with implementing the motion
controlled light switch upgrades after the LED lighting retrofit at The Municipal Office.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 16 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Table 5-6 Summary of Costs and Savings Associated with Motion Controlled Light Switch
installation at The Municipal Office

Annual
Demand Annual Incentives Simple
Energy System
Implement Reduction Savings Available Payback
Savings Cost ($)
(GJ) ($) ($) (years)
(GJ)

Immediately 0.003 4.8 148 825 0 6

Incentive Details N/A

Installation of Sub-meters on the major HVAC equipment.

Based on information gathered on Site, there are no sub meters installed on the major HVAC equipment.
It is highly recommended that the sub-meters be installed and recorded on a regular basis to track energy
consumption. Sub-metering will not save energy but will help identify energy consumption trends and
quantify opportunities for savings with improved accuracy.

6.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

The Energy Audit reviewed specific high energy consumption units and assessed the potential for
conservation. This assessment is based on assumptions and estimates that could be improved with more
detailed and accurate data/methodologies. The Site Building’s energy consumption is not as intensive as
other office facilities and some existing conservation measures are already in place. The building is
relatively new and designed to more stringent standards with regard to energy use and conservation.
The following recommendations are provided:

• Install programmable thermostats with conservative set points.

• Convert plug load equipment to Energy Star models

• Convert the fluorescent lighting fixtures to LEDs.

• Install motion sensor lighting in applicable areas.

• Replace the two (2) electric RTUs with gas-fired RTUs with VFDs.

• Record and log the electrical and natural gas consumption of the processes

The following table is a summary of the major utility savings identified for The Municipal Office

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 17 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

Annual Annual Annual Annual Est.


Potential Est.
Recommenda Electrical Gas GHG Cost Est. Grant
Section tion Savings Savings Savings Savings
Savings
Cost ($) Incentive
Payback
(%) (Yrs.)
(GJ) (GJ) (Kg) ($) ($)
Programmabl
e 15.3
4.1 -
(412 m3)
798 279 4% 0 0 0.0
Thermostats
Installation
Occupant &
6
Humidity
4.3 (1,667 - 1,615 186 1% 1,500 0 8
Controlled kWh)
Fans
21.1
Energy Star
4.4 (5,852 - 4,602 654 5% 6,000 0 9
Equipment kWh)
60.0
Lighting
5.1 (16,673 - 367 1,862 15% 21,950 2,164 10.6
Retrofit kWh)
Motion
Controlled 4.8 (1,329
5.2 kWh)
- 367 148 1% 825 0 5.6
Light
Switches

7.0 RECOMMENDED ITEMS FOR ASHRAE LEVEL II (CAPITAL GRADE) ENERGY AUDIT

Pinchin recommends a capital grade analysis of the following measures:

• BAS Installation

• High efficiency furnace replacement

• High efficiency Air Conditioner replacement

• Window Replacement

• Supplemental Wall Insulation

• Supplemental Roof Insulation

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 18 of 16


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I
October 16, 2019
5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, Ontario Pinchin File: 241444
Town of Erin FINAL

8.0 TERMS AND LIMITATIONS

This work was performed subject to the Terms and Limitations presented or referenced in the proposal for
this project.

Information provided by Pinchin is intended for Client use only. Pinchin will not provide results or
information to any party unless disclosure by Pinchin is required by law. Any use by a third party of
reports or documents authored by Pinchin or any reliance by a third party on or decisions made by a third
party based on the findings described in said documents, is the sole responsibility of such third parties.
Pinchin accepts no responsibility for damages suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or
actions conducted. No other warranties are implied or expressed.

The information provided in this report is based upon analysis of available documents, analytical results,
records and drawings, and personal contacts and interviews. In performing the assessment, Pinchin has
relied in good faith on information provided by the individuals noted in this report. Pinchin has assumed
that the documents, analytical results, records and drawings, and information provided by the individuals
noted in this report, including information provided in contacts and personal interviews, is factual and
accurate. Pinchin accepts no responsibility for any deficiency, misstatement or inaccuracy contained in
this report as a result of negligence, omissions, misinterpretations or fraudulent acts of persons
interviewed or contacted, or contained in reports that were reviewed, and makes no representation or
warranty as to the qualifications of any such persons or the reliability of information or reports provided by
them, whether or not such persons were introduced to the Client by Pinchin.

Pinchin did not attempt to identify locations of deposition of mould spores or particles, or minor mould
growth that would not exhibit any signs of spotting/staining on building materials. Pinchin would not be
able to identify locations of concealed mould growth within wall cavities and other hidden locations
without performing intrusive inspections. The degree of mould growth noted in the report may change with
time if water or humidity issues continue or develop after the assessment date(s). Any sources of water
infiltration or high humidity must be corrected to prevent the continuation or occurrence of mould growth.
Air sampling results (if any) will apply only to the time and conditions of the testing and may not be used
to reliably predict conditions on other days.
\\pinchin.com\Miss\Job\241000s\0241444.000 TofErin,VariousSites,Erin,BSS,BCA\Deliverables\Energy Audits\Municipal Building\241444, DRAFT, ASHRAE Level I EA, MOB,
T of Erin, 5684 Trafalgar Rd, Hillsburgh, ON Oct 10, 2019.docx

Template: Master Report for Energy Audit, BSS, July 3, 2018

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 19 of 16


APPENDIX I
Utility Bill Data
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Gas (m3)

Jan-17 34 784
Feb-17 29 434
Mar-17 28 36
Apr-17 33 255
May-17 29 3
Jun-17 30 21
Jul-17 32 7
Aug-17 31 -
Sep-17 29 -
Oct-17 32 83
Nov-17 29 167
Dec-17 29 590
Jan-18 33 928
Feb-18 30 268
Mar-18 28 215
Apr-18 32 249
May-18 31 178
Jun-18 31 9
Jul-18 29 90
Aug-18 31 -
Sep-18 32 36
Oct-18 29 106
Nov-18 30 430
Dec-18 31 400

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 2


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Utility Bill Date Appendix I

Date Duration (Days) Electricity (kWh)

Jan-17 34 7,600
Feb-17 29 6,773
Mar-17 32 6,928
Apr-17 28 5,657
May-17 30 5,988
Jun-17 33 7,275
Jul-17 30 7,131
Aug-17 32 7,199
Sep-17 30 6,656
Oct-17 30 7,083
Nov-17 31 6,313
Dec-17 28 5,717
Jan-18 32 6,764
Feb-18 31 7,364
Mar-18 30 6,831
Apr-18 30 6,635
May-18 28 6,478
Jun-18 33 8,285
Jul-18 28 7,889
Aug-18 32 8,528
Sep-18 32 8,295
Oct-18 32 7,910
Nov-18 29 6,457
Dec-18 26 6,465
Jan-19 32 7,359
Feb-19 31 6,672
Mar-19 23 6,311
Apr-19 35 5,640
May-19 30 6,575

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 2


APPENDIX II
Photographs
Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix V

General view of typical air-conditioning condenser found on Site.

View of typical light fixture found on Site.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 1 of 2


Energy Audit - ASHRAE Level I October 16, 2019
Town of Erin Pinchin File: 241444
Assumptions and Calculations Appendix V

General view of a furnace located in the basement mechanical room.

General view of DHW heater located in the basement mechanical room.

© 2019 Pinchin Ltd. Page 2 of 2

You might also like