Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Performance Evaluation of Pharmacetical Industry
Performance Evaluation of Pharmacetical Industry
The higher each of these ratios, the higher the cash resources available to
the firm.
Table 5.1: Cash Position of Beximco pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Particular Yea
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Cash + marketable 0.21 0.15 0.06 0.06 0.12
securities/Current liabilities
Cash + marketable 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.08 0.02
securities/ Sales
Cash + marketable 0.08 0.06 0.02 0.03 0.03
securities/ Total assets
0.08
0.08
0.25 0.21
0.07
0.2 0.15 0.06 0.05
0.12 0.05 0.04
0.15
0.04
0.1 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.02 0.02
0.02
0.05
0.01
0 0
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0.08 0.08
0.07 0.06
0.06
0.05
0.04 0.03 0.03
0.03 0.02
0.02
0.01
0
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
5.1.2 Liquidity
Liquidity refers to the ability of a firm to meet its short-term financial
obligations when and as they fall due. The cash position ratios discussed
capture one dimension of liquidity. Two additional liquidity ratios that
are frequently used are
❖ Quick Ratio =
Cash + short - term marketable securities + accounts receivable
Current liabilities
Current assets
❖ Current Ratio =
Current liabilities
Both ratios extend the assets in the numerator of the cash position ratios
include items that potentially can be converted into cash. The quick ratios
include accounts receivable. (Cash + short-term marketable securities+
accounts receivables are often called the “quick assets.”) The current ratio
also includes in the numerator items such as inventories and prepaid
expenses. The higher both the ratios, the higher the liquidity position of
the firm.
0.35 0.18
0.3 0.16
0.14
0.25
0.12
0.2 0.1
0.15 0.08
0.06
0.1
0.04
0.05 0.02
0 0
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
In the liquidity ratios table, there are two additional liquidity ratios that
are-
❖ Quick Ratio
❖ Current Ratio
The higher both the ratios, the higher the liquidity position of the firm. In
BPL financial statement the quick ratio in 2004-05 was 0.34. But in the
subsequent year, the ratios were declined consistently to 0.28, 0.19, and
0.17. This position was caused to an end in 2008-09 and back to the
previous liquidity position again. Current ratio in 2005-06 was also
satisfactory but in the later period this ratio was declined in the 2006-07,
2007-08 and 2008-09. But the overall liquidity position in 2008-09 was
quite commencing able. It shows that the companies' quick asset is quite
enough to meet its current obligation.
The average total assets figure in the ratios typically is calculated as the
equally weighted average of the opening and closing total assets figure
for the fiscal period. The higher each of the ratios, the larger the working
capital or cash flow generated by the firm in its operations. The ratios
could be extended to include changes in working capital or cash flow
from non-operations activities, for example, the use of cash to repurchase
the shares of the firm.
Table 5.3: Working Capital from Operation and Cash Flow from
Operation Ratios of Beximco Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Particular Year
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Working capital 0.82 0.80 0.81 0.89 0.78
from operations/ Sales
Working capital 0.65 0.57 0.62 0.64 0.59
from operations/
Total assets (average)
Cash flow from 0.17 0.20 0.19 0.16 0.25
operations/ Sales
Cash flow from 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.11 0.19
operations/ Total assets
(average)
0.9 0.66
0.88 0.64
0.86
0.62
0.84
0.82 0.6
0.8 0.58
0.78
0.56
0.76
0.74 0.54
0.72 0.52
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Working capital from operations/Sales Working capital from operations/Total assets (average)
0.25
0.2
0.2
0.15
0.15
0.1
0.1
0.05
0.05
0 0
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Cash flow from operations/ Sales Cash flow from operations/ Total assets (average)
The working capital and cash flow table presents the foregoing ratios for
each year of BPL. For each of these ratios, year 2005-06was the lowest
position and 2004-05 and 2006-07 was in average position. But in 2007-
08 and 2008-09 working capital were much higher than the previous year.
One important benefits of a higher cash flow per taka. Of sales or total
assets is the greater flexibility it permits a firm in its financing,
investment, or operating decision.
The higher each of these ratios, the higher the proportion of assets
financed by non-shareholder parties. Which components to include in the
numerator or denominator of the ratios depend on how one defines
liabilities and shareholders' equity. Unfortunately, there is not general
agreement in the accounting literature or in published financial reports on
the precise distinction between liabilities and equity.
0.1 0.45
0.09 0.4
0.08 0.35
0.07 0.3
0.06 0.25
0.05
0.2
0.04
0.15
0.03
0.1
0.02
0.01 0.05
0 0
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Long-term liabilities/ Shareholders' equity Current liabilities + long-term liabilities/ Shareholders' equity
The two capital structure ratios for the five years of BPL are reported in
the table. Deferred taxes are treated as part of shareholders equity when
computing these ratios. Both in 2005-06 and 2006-07 have capital
structures that are between the extremes of 2004-05 and 2008-09. In
2005-06 and 2006-08, the BPL was relies very heavily on debt financing
and in 2008-09 BPL was relies on outside financing for current liabilities.
As the ratios requirement, the higher the each of these ratios, the higher
the proportion of assets financed by parties, the BPL has to consider
when computing the capital structure ratios is the treatment of obligation
under leasing contracts.