Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VLSI Aman Assignment
VLSI Aman Assignment
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT
HOMEWORK 1: MOSFET
1 MAY 2023
SECTION 2
Lecturer:
DR. MUHAMMAD AFIQ NURUDIN BIN HAMZAH
1. Determine the operating region of PMOS and NMOS in Table 1 and Table 2 respectively.
Show the manual hand calculation of the drain current and verify the value using LTSPICE
simulation. Assume long channel MOSFET and ignore channel length modulation. Include the
LEVEL=1 or the standard SPICE parameters as in appendix in your simulation.
a) PMOS
Case 1:
|VGS | = 0.9V
VTp changes value due to body effect
VTp = VT0 + 𝛾[ √|−2∅𝐹 + VSB | − √|−2∅𝐹 | ]
VSB = VS - VB = 0 – 1 = -1V
VTp =−0.40 + (−0.4)[ √|−2(0.3) + (−1)| − √|−2(0.3)| ]
= -0.5961V
|VTp | = 0.5961V
𝑘′ 𝑊
I𝐷 = | | ( ) (|VGS − VTp |)2
2 𝐿
30µ 1.50
I𝐷 = (0.25) ( 0.3039)2
2
= 8.312µA
Figure 1: Schematic of PMOS circuit case 1
|VGS | = 1.2V
VTp changes value due to body effect
𝑘′ 𝑊
I𝐷 = | | ( 𝐿 ) (|VGS − VTp |)2
2
30µ 0.75
I𝐷 = (0.25) ( 0.3509)2
2
= 5.541µA
Case 1:
𝑊 VDS 2
I𝐷 = 𝑘 ′ ( 𝐿 ) [(VGS - VTn )VDS − )]
2
2.50 0.52
ID = (115µ) (0.25) [(1.17)0.5 − )] = 529µA
2
Case 2:
VGS = 1.2V
VTn changes value due to body effect
VTn = VT0 + 𝛾[ √|−2∅𝐹 + VSB | − √|−2∅𝐹 | ]
VSB = VS - VB = 0 – (-1) = 1V
VTn = 0.43 + 0.4[ √|−2(−0.3) + (1)| − √|−2(−0.3)| ]
= 0.6261V
𝑘′ 𝑊
I𝐷 = ( ) (VGS − VTn )2
2 𝐿
115µ 1.20
I𝐷 = (0.25) ( 0.5739)2
2
= 90.90µA
Figure 10: Schematic for NMOS case 2
PMOS
VGS = VG - VS
= -0.3 – (-0.9)
= 0.6V
VDS = VD - VS
= -1.5 – (-0.9)
= -0.6V
𝑊/𝐿= 5/3
VTp = -0.4V
VGS > VTp : PMOS ‘OFF’: Cut-off region
I𝐷 ≈ 0𝑉
There may be some current due to sub-threshold conductance, but the value is negligible.
Figure 17: VDS vs IDS for LEVEL=1 (PMOS DC Sweep Simulation with cursor)
Figure 19: VGS vs IDS for LEVEL=1 (PMOS DC Sweep Simulation with cursor)
Figure 20: Schematic for PMOS circuit (LEVEL49-BSIM3)
Figure 23: VDS vs IDS for (PMOS DC Sweep Simulation with cursor)
Figure 25: VGS vs IDS for (PMOS DC Sweep Simulation with cursor)
NMOS
VDS = 2 – 0.5
= 1.5V
VTn = 0.43V
𝑘′ 𝑊
I𝐷 = ( ) (VGS − VTn )2(1+λVDS )
2 𝐿
115µ 5
I𝐷 = (1) ( 0.67)2 (1+(0.06) (1.5))
2
= 140.67µA
Figure 30: VDS vs IDS for LEVEL=1 (NMOS DC Sweep Simulation with cursor)
Figure 32: VGS vs IDS for LEVEL=1 (NMOS DC Sweep Simulation with cursor)
Figure 33: Schematic for NMOS circuit (LEVEL49-BSIM3)
Figure 37: VDS vs IDS for (NMOS DC Sweep Simulation with cursor)
Figure 39: VGS vs IDS for (NMOS DC Sweep Simulation with cursor)
DISCUSSION
By comparing the values of the parameters acquired from the calculation and the
simulation for both LEVEL1 and BSIM3, Table 3 summarizes the results obtained for both the
given PMOS and NMOS circuit. Based on the simulation, it can be seen that the ID values of
the two MOSFETs are quite near to one another when using LEVEL1 simulation, with such
little calculation mistakes. This is because the theoretical computation and LEVEL1 simulation
both use the same standard transistor values. The model is full, thus there are no discontinuities,
but there are significant changes when they are compared to the values produced from BSIM3
simulation. As they are not in the optimal state due to a number of circumstances, this is typical
in real-world and even simulated scenarios.
CONCLUSION
Based on the entire assignment, it can also be inferred that we can determine a
MOSFET's operating condition, whether it is in cut-off region, linear region, or saturation
region, by calculating a PMOS or NMOS parameter for threshold voltage, gate-source current,
and drain-source current. I was unable to observe short-channel effects like velocity saturation
because they were completely ignored throughout the experiment. Nevertheless, the
assignment gave me a general idea of how to approach a circuit with different operation regions
due to various occurrences. As they are not in the optimal state due to a number of
circumstances, this is typical in real-world and even simulated scenarios.
As a result of variations in the MOSFET characteristics, simulations utilising the
LEVEL1 and BSIM3 simulation models would produce different results for the drain current,
I. Due to unclear real-world elements, however, D experimental findings could differ even
more than those of the BSIM3 simulation, and theoretical calculations can be quickly
confirmed using the LTSpice simulation.
REFERENCE
PMOS VS NMOS: Focus on Two Main Forms of MOSFET. (2022, October 25). Wevolver.
https://www.wevolver.com/article/pmos-vs-nmos-focus-on-two-main-forms-of-
mosfet
Anysilicon. (2022, July 3). Introduction to NMOS and PMOS Transistors - AnySilicon.
AnySilicon. https://anysilicon.com/introduction-to-nmos-and-pmos-transistors/
BSIM3 Model (BSIM3 MOSFET Model) - ADS 2009 - Keysight Knowledge Center. (n.d.).
https://edadocs.software.keysight.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=5908900#app-
switcher
LEVEL1 Model (MOSFET Level-1 Model) - ADS 2009 - Keysight Knowledge Center. (n.d.).
https://edadocs.software.keysight.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=5908967