Group 2

Numbers 20-28

CLASSICAL PHONEMICS

LST 412 Topics in phonology

20. Odiru Okeoghene Rita

Art1910047

21. Imafidon favour miracle.

22.Oko-boh Violet ART1901414

23.Onotiemoria Hope Oseiwe ART1901432

24. Okwara Joy Onyedikachi Art1901421

25. Amanze kelechukwu ART1901319

26. Chinedu Victory Ifunanya

27.Esohe Austine-Jesus

28.Usiwoma Favour Ufuoma ART1901468

29.Okolo Awele Precious ART1901415

30. Samuels Mirabella Omosefe ART1902459

31. Igboeli chinemerem peace

32.Emmumejakpor Precious ART1901341

33. Samali Stella Benedictah..... Art1901457

34. Yusuff Funmilayo-ART1901473

35. Eberechi chiagoziem prosper ART1901332

36. Ndazhaga Namaba ART1901388

37. Okechukwu Precious Chiamaka

ART 1901411

38. Adingupu Busayo ART1901293

INTRODUCTION

Classical phonemics, also known as structuralist phonemics, is a linguistic approach that was influential
in the mid-20th century, primarily during the 1920s to 1950s. It is associated with structural linguistics,
which emphasizes the study of language as a system of interrelated elements.

1. Historical Background:

Classical phonemics emerged in the early 20th century as a reaction against historical and comparative
linguistics, which focused on the historical development of languages.

The structuralist movement, which had significant influence in the early 20th century, laid the
foundation for classical phonemics. Scholars like Ferdinand de Saussure, Leonard Bloomfield, and
Edward Sapir were central figures in this movement.

Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913):

Saussure's work laid the groundwork for structural linguistics and classical phonemics.

In his influential book, "Course in General Linguistics" (published posthumously in 1916), Saussure
introduced key ideas such as the distinction between langue (the abstract system of language) and
parole (individual speech acts), and the concept of the linguistic sign.

Leonard Bloomfield (1887-1949):

Bloomfield, an American linguist, is often associated with classical phonemics.

His book "Language" (1933) was a key reference in this approach, emphasizing the analysis of languages
as synchronic systems.

Charles Hockett.

It was not until the 1950s that phonemics was formally defined and systematized, with the work of
American linguist Charles Hockett.

The most commonly cited publication that introduced classical phonemics in its modern form is Charles
Hockett's 1955 book, "A Course in Modern Linguistics." In this book, Hockett presented a formal
definition of phonemics, which is still used today. So we could say that classical phonemics began fully in
1955.

Key Concepts in Classical Phonemics:

 1. Phoneme: The central concept in classical phonemics is the phoneme, which is the smallest
distinctive unit of sound in a language. Phonemes are abstract representations that distinguish
meaning in a language. They are not physical sounds but rather cognitive categories that
different sounds can belong to. For example, in English, /p/ and /b/ are distinct phonemes
because they can change the meaning of a word (e.g., "pat" vs. "bat").

According to classical phonemic theory, each phoneme is represented by a unique symbol in the
International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). For example, the English language has 44 phonemes, represented
by symbols such as /p/, /b/, /t/, /d/, /k/, /g/, /s/, /z/, /f/, /v/, /θ/, /ð/, /ʃ/, /ʒ/, /h/, /m/, /n/, /ŋ/, /l/, /r/,
and others.

2. Allophones: Allophones are the various physical realizations of a phoneme in different phonetic
contexts. Allophones are specific sounds that are related to a particular phoneme but do not
change the meaning of a word. For example, in English, the aspirated /pʰ/ (as in "pat") and the
unaspirated /p/ (as in "spat") are allophones of the same phoneme /p/ because they are
perceived as the same sound by native speakers.

Allophones in Igbo

1. /k/ and /kʰ/: Igbo has both a plain voiceless velar plosive (/k/) and an aspirated voiceless velar
plosive (/kʰ/). The choice of which to use depends on the specific word and context.

Example:

- Oka [ɔká] (bench)

- Okpa [ɔ̰kʰpà] (bambara nut pudding)

2. /p/ and /pʰ/: Similar to the previous example, Igbo has both a plain voiceless bilabial plosive (/p/) and
an aspirated voiceless bilabial plosive (/pʰ/).

Example:

- Opu [ópù] (cotton)

- Nkpọ [nkʰpɔ] (to pick)

3. /s/ and /ʃ/: In certain dialects of Igbo, the sound /s/ can be pronounced as /ʃ/ in specific
environments.Phonemic Analysis: Classical phonemics aims to identify and analyze the phonemes that
exist in a particular language. Phonemic analysis involves establishing minimal pairs, which are pairs of
words that differ in meaning by only one phoneme. By systematically comparing words in a language,
linguists can determine which sounds are contrastive and, therefore, represent different phonemes.
 Minimal pair examples in yoruba language;

1) Oko:farm

Odo:river

2) Ibi: here

Ebi: family

3) Eru: fear

Iru: locust beans

4) Inu: stomach

Enu: mouth

5) Owo: hand

Omo: child

6) Ba: meet

Pa: kill

4. Phonemic Transcription: Classical phonemics uses a phonemic transcription system to represent

the phonemes of a language. In phonemic transcription, symbols are used to indicate the phonemes,
without indicating the specific allophones that may be realized in different contexts. For instance,
the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) is commonly used to represent phonemes.

5. Complementary Distribution: Allophones in a language often exhibit complementary distribution—

meaning they appear in distinct phonetic contexts without overlapping. This distribution ensures that
different allophones do not contrast and change the meaning of words. For example, in English, the /t/
at the beginning of the word "top" is aspirated, while the /t/ in the middle or end of a word, like "stop,"
is not aspirated.

Here are some examples complementary distribution in igbo language:

6. Minimal Pairs: Minimal pairs are pairs of words that differ in meaning by a single phoneme. Analyzing
minimal pairs is essential in identifying phonemes in a language.
Rules of Classical phonemics

The classical phonemic theory also suggests that there are rules or patterns for combining phonemes to
form words and sentences in a language. These rules are known as phonological rules and they govern
the distribution and behavior of phonemes in different contexts. For example, in English, the
phoneme /p/ is pronounced differently depending on its position in a word. It is pronounced with a puff
of air (aspirated) at the beginning of a word, as in "pat", but not aspirated at the end of a word, as in
"stop".

Overall, classical phonemic theory provides a useful framework for analyzing and describing the sound
systems of languages and understanding how sounds are organized and used to convey meaning.

Critiques and Limitations of Classical Phonemics:

1. Lack of Focus on Phonetics: Classical phonemics prioritizes the analysis of phonemes and their
contrasting functions, often overshadowing the phonetic details and variations within a language. This
narrower focus on the abstract, contrastive aspects of sound systems omits the rich phonetic nuances of
speech.

2. Simplification of Language Variation: Classical phonemics tends to homogenize speech by focusing on

the standard or prestige dialect of a language. It may overlook the natural variation in pronunciation that
exists across different regions, social groups, or individual speakers.

3. Not Accounting for Suprasegmental Features: Classical phonemics primarily deals with segmental
features such as individual sounds or phonemes, but it gives less attention to suprasegmental features
(e.g., stress, intonation, and tone). These features play a crucial role in meaning and communication.

4. Difficulties in Applying to Non-Standard Languages: The principles and analysis techniques of classical
phonemics were primarily developed for standardized languages. Applying them to non-standard and
less-documented languages can be challenging due to the variations and complexities present in those
languages' sound systems.

While classical phonemics has laid a foundation for the study of phonology and language analysis,
contemporary phonological frameworks, such as generative phonology and optimality theory, have
evolved to address some of the limitations of classical phonemics.

Structural Analysis:
Classical phonemics focused on structural analysis, which meant looking at a language at a particular
point in time (synchronically) rather than examining its historical development (diachronically).

Linguists would identify phonemes and their distribution within a language to create phonemic
inventories.

Legacy and Evolution:

While classical phonemics was influential in the mid-20th century, it evolved into more modern
phonological theories. Generative phonology, introduced by Noam Chomsky and Morris Halle in the
1950s, marked a significant departure from classical phonemics.

Classical phonemics was a structural linguistic approach that focused on analyzing the phonological
structure of languages as synchronic systems. It was influential in the early to mid-20th century, primarily
through the work of scholars like Saussure and Bloomfield, but it has evolved into more sophisticated
phonological theories in contemporary linguistics.

1. Distinctive Features:

Classical phonemics also laid the foundation for the concept of distinctive features in phonology.
Distinctive features are binary properties that distinguish one phoneme from another. For example, the
features [voice], [nasal], [continuant], and [sonorant] are commonly used to describe English
consonants.

This framework allowed linguists to describe the phonemes of a language in terms of a set of distinctive
features, making it easier to analyze and compare different phonological systems.

2. Influence on Phonological Theory:

Classical phonemics was a crucial precursor to later developments in phonological theory. While it had
limitations, especially in accounting for phonological variation and processes, it laid the groundwork for a
more rigorous approach to phonological analysis.

Generative phonology, which emerged in the 1950s, incorporated and expanded upon many of the
principles of classical phonemics. It introduced formal rules and underlying representations, providing a
more detailed and flexible model for phonological analysis.

3. Teaching and Pedagogy:

The principles of classical phonemics have had a significant impact on the teaching and learning of
pronunciation in second language acquisition. Language teachers often use phonemic notation and
minimal pairs to help students acquire the correct pronunciation of sounds in a new language.

4. Research in Dialectology:
Classical phonemics has also influenced research in dialectology and sociolinguistics. By identifying
phonemes and distinctive features, linguists can study variations in pronunciation and dialectal
differences within a language.

4. Contemporary Phonological Theories:

While classical phonemics has evolved into more modern phonological theories, its emphasis on the
abstract representation of phonemes and their distinctive features continues to inform the field of
linguistics.

The study of phonology remains a crucial area of linguistic research, with contemporary theories
addressing more complex phonological phenomena, such as metrical structure, autosegmental
phonology, and optimality theory.

Classical phonemics was a pivotal approach in the history of linguistics that contributed to the
development of structural linguistics and the study of phonological systems in various languages. While
it had limitations, its concepts and methodology have left a lasting legacy, shaping the way linguists
approach the analysis of language sounds and phonological features in both teaching and research.

5. Computer-Assisted Research:

Classical phonemics also played a role in early computational linguistics. Linguists sought to represent
phonological data in a machine-readable format, which was a precursor to modern computational tools
used in phonological research.

6. Cross-Linguistic Analysis:

The approach of identifying phonemes and their distinctive features became a foundation for cross-
linguistic phonological studies. By comparing the phonological systems of various languages, linguists can
gain insights into universal principles and language-specific variations.

7. Integration into Pedagogical Materials:

Classical phonemics principles, such as the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), are widely integrated
into language teaching materials. They help language learners and teachers understand and
communicate the phonological aspects of a new language accurately.

7. Preservation of Endangered Languages:

Classical phonemics is also valuable in the documentation and preservation of endangered languages.
Linguists use this approach to record the sound systems of languages threatened with extinction,
contributing to linguistic diversity research.

8. Historical and Diachronic Studies:

While classical phonemics emphasized synchronic analysis, it also influenced historical linguistics by
providing a foundation for comparing sound changes over time. Understanding the phonological changes
in a language's history relies on the identification of phonemes.

9. Transformation into Other Linguistic Fields:

Concepts from classical phonemics have been integrated into other linguistic subfields, such as
psycholinguistics, neurolinguistics, and experimental phonetics, contributing to a more comprehensive
understanding of language processing and speech production.

10. Evolving Phonological Theories:

Modern phonological theories have expanded upon the foundations of classical phonemics. These
include non-linear phonology, feature geometry, and prosodic phonology, which provide more
sophisticated explanations of phonological patterns.

In summary, classical phonemics made significant contributions to the field of linguistics, especially in
the study of phonological systems, the development of phonemic notation, and the comparison of
languages. Its influence persists in various linguistic disciplines, educational materials, and language
documentation efforts, while also serving as a stepping stone to more advanced phonological theories.