This study presents the descriptive statistics from a survey we conducted to understand the

community’s perception and suggestions regarding flood resilience in Barangay Basagan. The survey
covered various aspects including the frequency of flooding, impact severity, satisfaction with current
measures, awareness and participation in community initiatives, and opinions on government policies
and additional support needed.

The survey reveals that flooding is a common issue in Barangay Basagan. A significant majority, 65.7% of
respondents, experience flooding very frequently, while 34.3% report frequent flooding. This indicates a
persistent and severe problem that requires urgent attention.

The impact of flooding on property is notably severe, with 77.1% of respondents describing the damage
as very severe and 11.4% as severe. Only a small percentage experience moderate (5.7%), mild (2.9%),
or minimal damage (2.9%). This highlights the substantial economic and structural challenges faced by
the community.

There is a mixed level of satisfaction with the current flood mitigation measures. While 48.6% of
respondents are very satisfied and 25.7% are satisfied, a notable proportion are dissatisfied (14.3%) or
very dissatisfied (11.4%). This indicates that current efforts are insufficient for a significant portion of the
community.

When asked about sustainable strategies to enhance flood resilience, 28.5% of respondents support
implementing all suggested strategies, demonstrating a preference for a comprehensive approach.
Specific strategies such as infrastructure development (26.2%) and reforestation and watershed
management (16.7%) also receive substantial support. Improved drainage systems and early warning
systems each garner 11.9% of the responses, while community-based flood preparedness programs are
supported by 4.8%.

Awareness of community-based initiatives is relatively high, with 62.9% of respondents indicating they
are aware of such efforts. However, participation rates are lower, with only 48.6% having participated in
these initiatives. This suggests a gap between awareness and active involvement.

Community participation is perceived as beneficial, with 40% of respondents considering it very effective
and 31.4% effective. However, some respondents rate it as quite effective (14.3%), ineffective (5.7%), or
very ineffective (8.6%), indicating varying levels of confidence in the impact of community efforts.

A majority (57.1%) of respondents are aware of government programs aimed at improving flood
resilience, while 42.9% are not. This suggests that more efforts may be needed to disseminate
information about governmental initiatives.

Opinions on the government's response to flooding are generally positive, with 45.7% rating it very well
and 31.4% well. However, 20% believe the response is poor, and 2.9% rate it very poorly, indicating
room for improvement.
Respondents identified a range of additional support needed to enhance flood resilience. The most
commonly cited need is comprehensive support including all suggested measures (32.6%). Specific
needs include food aid/support (18.2%), monetary/financial assistance (16.4%), and increased funding
for infrastructure development (10.9%).

When asked for other suggestions to control flooding, 56% of respondents recommend building dams,
28% suggest river riprap or walls, and 16% advocate for tree planting. These responses highlight the
community’s preference for structural and environmental solutions.