Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Motorized Mist Sprayer
Motorized Mist Sprayer
SPRAYER
BY
KOLAWOLE OMOLOLA COMFORT
MATRIC NO: 2102012036
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING,
OCTOBER, 2023.
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A MOTORIZED MIST
SPRAYER
BY
OCTOBER, 2023.
ii
CERTIFICATION
____________________ _________________
ENGR. O.A TANIMOLA Date
(SUPERVISOR)
___________________ __________________
ENGR. DR. R.R. DIRINFO Date
(HEAD OF DEPARTMENT)
iii
DECLARATION
record of my project work. It has neither been presented nor accepted in any
__________________ _________________
KOLAWOLE, OMOLOLA COMFORT Date
(2102012036)
iv
DEDICATION
This report is dedicated to Almighty God who has seen me through the
v
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
have added depth and meaning to this journey. Their collective supports,
profoundly grateful.
only charted the course of my project but have also profoundly enriched my
vi
ABSTRACT
Motorized mist sprayers are machines that use an engine to power a pump to
pressurize a liquid solution and then atomize it into a fine mist. They are
including speed, uniformity, and precision. However, they can also be more
are a versatile and effective tool for spraying a variety of liquids. The
nozzles, air blower, spray hose and boom, frame, controls, wand, filters and
safety features.
The result obtained from the test shows that the machine have an average
effective field capacity of 0.129 ha/hr, theoretical field capacity of 0.21 ha/hr
vii
TABLE OF CONTENT
Contents Page
Title Page
Cover page i
Certification ii
Declaration iii
Acknowledgements iv
Dedication v
Abstract vi
List of Tables
List of Plates
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.3 Justification 4
viii
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
CHAPTER THREE
3.1 Materials 17
ix
3.1.1 Components of a motorized mist sprayer 17
CHAPTER FOUR
CHAPTER FIVE
5.1 Conclusion 36
5.2 Recommendation 36
REFERENCES 37-41
APPENDIX 42-47
x
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
4.1 32
4.2 33
LIST OF FIGURES
3.1 25
3.2 26
3.4 30
xi
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
in a fine mist. These machines are a result of ingenious engineering and play
optimization.
1
2020). Additionally, motorized mist sprayers are used for outdoor cooling,
the myriad applications that benefit from their ingenuity. As industries seek
Motorized mist sprayers are agricultural tools that generate a fine mist or
spray of liquid that can be used for crop protection, weed control, and pest
mist sprayers has been driven by the need for more efficient and effective
2019).
advantages is their ability to produce a fine mist that can reach all parts of
2
the crop, including the undersides of leaves and stems, where pests and
diseases are often found. This helps to ensure thorough coverage and better
control of pests and diseases. Motorized mist sprayers also require less water
The development of motorized mist sprayers has also been motivated by the
population. The use of these tools can help farmers to increase their crop
yields and reduce losses due to pests and diseases, thus contributing to food
Overall, the background and motivation for the design and construction of a
motorized mist sprayer are based on the need for more efficient and effective
the way crops are protected and grown, leading to better yields, reduced
3
1.2 Aim and Objectives
The aim of the project is to design and construct a motorized mist sprayer
ii. To construct the motorized mist sprayer using appropriate tools and
techniques
performance evaluation.
1.3 Justification
4
the developed motorized mist sprayer will play a pivotal role in reducing the
hazards associated with exposure to harmful chemicals for both farmers and
users.
This project is limited to the design and construction of a mist sprayer using
5
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
essential tools in agriculture and public health for crop protection, pest
control, and disease management. Mist sprayers are agricultural devices that
form onto target surfaces. This mist is composed of smaller droplets than
health. Motorized mist sprayers have a rich history, with their roots in mid-
6
2.1 Definition of a mist sprayer
A mist sprayer is a type of device used to disperse a liquid into tiny droplets,
more.
applications. These types differ in their design, operation, and the size of the
droplets they produce. Here are some common types of mist sprayers:
pressure pump and nozzle to create a fine mist with droplets ranging
from 50 to 200 microns. They are ideal for applications that require
7
penetration and uniform coverage, such as mosquito control and
greenhouse operations.
iv. Electrostatic Sprayers: These sprayers charge the mist with static
mosquito control.
8
solution effectively, providing better coverage and penetration than
ii. Pump System: The pump system pressurizes the liquid and delivers it
through the nozzle. Piston and diaphragm pumps are commonly used
iii. Nozzles: Nozzles determine droplet size and distribution, with various
iv. Tank Capacity: The tank holds the solution to be sprayed, affecting
section, we delve into the key aspects of their design and performance.
9
2.4.1 Design of Mist Sprayers
critical components such as liquid pumps, nozzles, and air blowers. These
Among the crucial components, the nozzle design plays a pivotal role in
size, spray coverage, and drift reduction. Different nozzle types cater to
application requirements, such as larger droplets for some tasks and smaller
10
The spray pattern, defining the shape and direction of the spray plume, is
vital in maximizing coverage and penetration. The right spray pattern should
Spray pressure affects droplet size, spray pattern, and drift. Optimizing spray
pressure is crucial to achieve the desired droplet size and pattern while
pressure and flow rate. The pump type should align with application needs,
al., Year).
11
Mist sprayers can be powered by different sources, including electric,
forestry, and public health. They are frequently employed for the precise
and fertilizers, dispersing them in the form of a fine mist. This section
12
ii Orchard and Vineyard Use: In orchard and vineyard settings, mist
sprayers are invaluable for pest and disease management. They prove
forest pests such as the spruce budworm and gypsy moth. The mist
2017).
13
2.6 Design considerations for mist sprayers
The design factors affect droplet size, spray pattern, and application
efficiency. Here are some key design considerations for mist sprayers:
i. Droplet Size: The size of the droplets generated by the mist sprayer is
2018).
ii. Spray Pattern: The spray pattern defines the shape and direction of
the nozzle design or flow rate can help achieve different spray
iii. Spray Pressure: The spray pressure affects droplet size, spray
the desired droplet size and pattern while minimizing drift (Stone,
2017).
iv. Nozzle Design: The design of the nozzle plays a critical role in
achieving the desired droplet size and spray pattern. Selecting the
14
right nozzle based on application requirements, solution flow rate, and
v. Pump Type: The type of pump used in the mist sprayer affects the
spray pressure and flow rate. Choosing the appropriate pump based on
vi. Power Source: The power source for the mist sprayer, whether
Motorized mist sprayers are sprayers that use a motor to drive the pump,
generating the pressure required to atomize the solution into a mist. These
including higher flow rates, more consistent spray patterns, and reduced
operator fatigue. In this section, we will discuss motorized mist sprayers and
sprayers are used for vector control, mosquito control, and other pest
pump sprayers but are powered by a motor. Mounted sprayers are typically
includes cleaning the sprayer after each use, checking the pump and motor
16
for proper functioning, and replacing worn or damaged parts (Wanjiru et al.,
2020).
CHAPTER THREE
3.1 Materials
iii. Liquid Pump: The liquid pump pressurizes the solution from the
iv. Nozzles: It is responsible for breaking the liquid into tiny droplets.
The design and size of the nozzles determine the droplet size and
spray pattern.
v. Spray Hose and Boom: These components guide the mist to the
may be used.
components.
ix. Filters: These are used to ensure that the liquid passing through the
system is free from debris or contaminants that could clog the nozzles.
18
3.1.2 Material selection
When designing the motorized mist sprayer, close attention was paid to its
The materials selected for making the sprayer based on how strong and long-
lasting they are, how well they fit the needs, and if they are easy to find in
our local area. The frame, the part that holds everything together, is made of
a strong and lightweight steel called black plate steel. This helps keep the
sprayer not too heavy but still tough. The tank, hat store the liquid, is made
of plastic to make it lighter, and it can hold up to 20 liters. The engine, the
part that makes the sprayer work, has a power of 0.75kw, which is like
having 1 horsepower in a car. The nozzle for spraying was designed to give
19
4. Nozzle: Fan-type nozzle with a spray angle of 110 degrees
Using the area of the Surface Area Formula of the tank (James R. Smart
(2015)
A= 2 ×(l× w+ w ×ℎ+ℎ × l)
Where,
A= 2 ×(l× w+ w ×ℎ+ℎ × l)
A= 2 ×(2600)
A= 5200 cm2
20
Figure 3.1: Tank
V = 1560 cm3
M = 1560 g
21
Converting gram to kilogram
M = 1.56 kg
A= 2(968)
A= 1936 cm3
22
V = Volume of the frame
V = 193.6cm3
M = 193.6cm3 × 7.85g/cm3
M = 1519.76g
M = 1.5198kg
23
Fig. 3.4: Diagram of a Flat fan type nozzle Spray pattern
This machine has a strong frame made of black plate steel. It has a big tank
that can hold 20 liters of liquid, and the tank itself weighs about 1.6kg. The
frame is quite large, covering an area of 1936cm2, and it holds all the
machine's parts, including the engine. The engine has a power of 0.75KW,
which is like having 1 horsepower. There's a hose that's 120cm long, and an
extension pipe that's 60cm long. These help the machine reach a wider area
in the field. We attached three special nozzles to the pipe, and these spray
the liquid in a flat fan shape. The machine also has a control valve, which is
used to adjust the pressure of the sprayer. There's a stop button to turn off
the engine. To make it easier for the person using the machine, we added a
backpack support that helps them feel more comfortable and makes it easier
After selection of plots to test the machine, an area of 20 square meters was
marked on the field using a measuring tape. 10 liters of liquid was measured
using the tank's measuring marks on the side. To prepare the chemical
mixture, 1.5 liters of the chemical was measured using a measuring cup and
24
poured it into the tank, which already had 8.5 liters of water and mixed it
gently. The test was carried out three times, each time using a different
The machine sprays the liquid at a rate of 5 liters per minute at a pressure of
25 kg/cm2. A stopwatch was used to record the time it took for the machine
to spray the liquid during the test. When the pressure is kept constant at 25
25
CHAPTER FOUR
4.1 RESULTS
The machine was put to test on the field after construction. The results
(EFC)
26
Table 4.2 Theoretical field capacity of the motorized mist sprayer
(TFC)
4.2 Discussion
Theoretical field capacity is the rate of field coverage of the machine based
on 100% time at the rated speed and covering 100% of it rated width. Since
the plots 1, 2 and 3 were measured equally (i.e. 20 square meters) and
width× speed
TFC ¿ 10
(Singh and Sahay, 2010)
0.6 ×3.5
¿
10
= 0.21 ha/h
27
4.2.2 Effective field capacity, ha/h
Effective field capacity was measured by the actual area covered by the
machine, based on its total time consumed. Effective field capacity (EFC)
The field efficiency is the ratio of effective field capacity to theoretical field
The field efficiency of 81%, 54.1% and 50% were recorded during the
28
CHAPTER FIVE
5.1 Conclusion
The motorized mist sprayer's performance was tested on a small plot of land
covering 0.0020 hectare and the following conclusions were made. The
average field efficiency was found to be 61.7% in the field while the
was found to cover 0.129 hectares in an hour and the average speed of
operation for the machine was 3.5 kilometers per hour. From the above
field at that determined field efficiency though there are still rooms for
improvement.
5.2 Recommendations
machine.
carrying by operators.
29
REFERENCES
1-10.
30
Marques, G., Santos, J., & Cunha, M. (2018). Crop protection using
Misterek, J., et al. (2018). Innovative Mist Sprayer for Precision Application
blowers/sprayers.Retrievedfromhttps://www.npic.orst.edu/pest/mist.h
tml.
Prado J. E., Rosa J. F., and Silva F. R., "Design and evaluation of a portable
31
Richardson R. J., "Motorized sprayers for the application of insecticides to
798, 1965.
Rimmer, A. (2019). Influence of spray nozzle type, nozzle pressure and air
Steele D. D., "A review of agricultural spray adjuvants for droplet retention
on plant surfaces," Crop Protection, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 416-422, 2009.
32
Tzanakakis, M. E., & Zannikos, F. (2017). Spraying systems in precision
Ullah S., Shahbaz M., Khan M. I., and Shabbir S. A., "Design, Fabrication
1175-1186, 2017.
Ullah S., Shahbaz M., Khan M. I., and Shabbir S. A., "Design, Fabrication
1175-1186, 2017.
52.
Wang, S., et al. (2019). A Novel Design of Outdoor Cooling System Based
100, 149-157.
33
Wharton, P., & Mankin, R. W. (2018). New spray technologies for
Sprayers.
Yang, X., Chen, L., Wang, Y., & Liu, Z. (2019). Characteristics and
34
Zorloni A., Lioy G., Melandri M., Fontanelli M., Frasconi C. Application
APPENDICE
Appendix I: Calculations
Area of tank
35
A= 2 ×(l× w+ w ×ℎ+ℎ × l)
Where,
A= 2 ×(l× w+ w ×ℎ+ℎ × l)
A= 2 ×(2600)
A= 5200 cm2
Volume of tank
Weight of tank = v × ℓ
V = 1560 cm3
M = 1560 g
36
Converting gram to kilogram
M = 1.56 kg
Area of Frame
A= 2(968)
A= 1936 cm3
Weight of Frame
Weight of frame = v × ℓ
V = 193.6cm3
M = 193.6cm3 × 7.85g/cm3
M = 1519.76g
37
Converting gram to kilogram
M = 1.5198kg
total area ( ℎa )
EFC = ha/hr
Time taken ( ℎr )
0.0020 ( ℎa )
EFC1 = ha/hr
0.0118 ( ℎr )
0.0020 ( ℎa )
EFC2 = ha/hr
0.0176 ( ℎr )
0.0020 ( ℎa )
EFC3 = ha/hr
0.0190 ( ℎr )
0.1695+0.1136 +0.1053
Average Effective Field Capacity = 3
0.3884
Average Effective Field Capacity = 3
38
0.1695
Field Efficiency (F1) = 0.21 x 100
0.1136
Field Efficiency (F2) = 0.21 x 100
0.1053
Field Efficiency (F3) = 0.21 x 100
F 1+ F 2+ F 3
Average Field Efficiency = 3
81+54.1+50
Average Field Efficiency = 3
185.1
Average Field Efficiency = 3
0.6 X 3.5
TFC = 10
ha/hr
2.1
TFC = 10 ha/hr
39
TFC = 0.21 ha/hr
Appendix ii
Cost Analysis
Tank 5,000
Steel 20,000
Hose 4,000
Miscellaneous 30,000
Total 151,000
40