Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Khoirotul Umayah - The Using of Storytelling in Teaching Vocabulary of The Fifth Graders at SD IT Samawi Yogyakarta
Khoirotul Umayah - The Using of Storytelling in Teaching Vocabulary of The Fifth Graders at SD IT Samawi Yogyakarta
A THESIS
Written by:
Khoirotul Umayah
182222104
FACULTY OF EDUCATION
2022
THE USING OF STORYTELLING IN TEACHING VOCABULARY OF
THE FIFTH GRADERS AT SD IT SAMAWI YOGYAKARTA
A THESIS
Written by:
Khoirotul Umayah
182222104
FACULTY OF EDUCATION
NAHDLATUL ULAMA UNIVERSITY OF YOGYAKARTA
2022
i
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
1. Rahayu, S.Pd., M.Pd. as a thesis supervisor, who has provided time, energy,
and thoughts to direct the author in the preparation of this thesis.
2. Dr. Suhadi Cholil as Dean Faculty of Education, Nahdlatul Ulama
University, Yogyakarta
3. Khusnul Harsul Lisan, S.S. M.Hum. as the head of the English Education
Study Program of Nahdlatul Ulama University Yogyakarta and as the
second examiner for this thesis.
4. All lecturers and teaching staffs at the Faculty of Education, Nahdlatul
Ulama University, Yogyakarta.
5. Ahlan, S.Pd. as the Principal of SD IT Samawi and Nurlela, S.Pd., as
English Teacher who has allowed the author to conduct research at SD IT
Samawi Yogyakarta.
6. Mrs. Zumroah as parents of the author who always pray for and provide
material and moral support for the smooth process of research and thesis
preparation.
7. All of friends who provide support and assistance in writing the thesis.
8. Thanks for my beloved who support me during writing the thesis.
9. All people, whose names cannot be mentioned, thanks for the help and
support during writing the thesis.
10. The last thanks for my self because you did the best you can and never give
up.
The writer realize that the writing of this thesis is still far from perfect. Finally,
the writer hopes that Allah SWT is pleased to repay all the kindness of all those
iv
THE USING OF STORYTELLING IN TEACHING VOCABULARY OF
THE FIFTH GRADERS AT SD IT SAMAWI YOGYAKARTA
Khoirotul Umayah
182222104
ABSTRACT
This research is aimed to find out the effect of using storytelling in teaching
vocabulary of the fifth graders at SD IT Samawi Yogyakarta. This research method
was Quasi Experimental Research, while the research design used Nonequivalent
Control Group Design. The sample in this research was students of class 5. Class
5 Ar Rozi (24 students) as the experimental class and class 5 Ibnu Rusyd (26
students) as the control class. The experimental group was students taught using
storytelling whereas the control group was students taught using conventional
technique. The data were obtained by using pre-test and post-test. The pre-test was
given to both groups before the treatment and the post-test was given after the
treatment. The data of the pre-test and post-test of both groups were analyzed by
using descriptive and inferential statistics. After the data were tested and found to
be homogeneous and normal, the hypothesis was tested using t-test. In the
experimental group the average of post-test was 76.6 and the control group was
70.4. the result of hypothesis t-test showed that the significance value was 0,026 <
0,05. It means that there was significant difference in learning achievement between
students who taught by using storytelling and those taugh by using conventional
technique. Therefore, it can be concluded the using storytelling waas effective in
teaching vocabulary of the fifth graders at SD IT Samawi Yogyakarta.
vii
THE USING OF STORYTELLING IN TEACHING VOCABULARY OF
THE FIFTH GRADERS AT SD IT SAMAWI YOGYAKARTA
Khoirotul Umayah
182222104
ABSTRACT
viii
LIST OF CONTENT
x
LIST OF PICTURES
xi
LIST OF TABLES
xii
LIST OF APPENDICES
xiii
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
A. Theoretical Background
1. Definition of Vocabulary
even grammar. This does not mean that grammar or other elements of a
language are less important. This is because when students know the
vocabulary, they can at least convey their ideas, while if they only know the
grammar, they cannot express their ideas.
2. Types of Vocabulary
Nation (2000: 38) divides vocabulary into two types; receptive lexicon
and productive lexicon. These types rely on vocabulary knowledge.
Receptive vocabulary is used to understand the shape of the word and its
meaning when listening or reading. Productive vocabulary is used when
someone wants to express their thoughts by speaking or writing, in the
correct form. Nation (2000: 38) suggests a different language for the
receptive and productive vocabulary. Use active and passive vocabulary.
According to Corson, active vocabulary is included in passive vocabulary,
along with three other types of word lists: words that are avoided, low
frequency words, and partially known words. Carson's description of active
and passive vocabulary is not based on knowledge of words, but on the use
of words. Furthermore, Crystal (2008: 512) also divides vocabulary into two
types, they are active and passive vocabulary. Active vocabulary are the
words that people usually use, while passive vocabulary are the words that
people understand but rarely used.
1) Listening vocabulary
The listening vocabulary is the largest class of vocabularies. It forms the
basis for the development of other vocabulary classes. It contains words
that are commonly known to learners when they hear them in the
language they are learning.
7
2) Speaking vocabulary
Speaking vocabulary is frequently used in conversation. It is
relatively limited than the listening vocabulary because the knowledge or
understanding of some words is incomplete or contextual. Students can
sometimes understand words only in a specific situation or sentence
without the exact understanding of the words.
3) Reading vocabulary
These are the words that students usually understand in a text. It might
be the second most important vocabulary after listening vocabulary. At
the beginning of the school, the students have only a few words in their
reading vocabulary, but it will expand after the first year.
4) Writing vocabulary
These are the words that students use to express their ideas through
written texts. Students' written vocabulary is greatly influenced by the
words they can spell. In addition, students' writing vocabulary, like
listening vocabulary, is smaller than reading vocabulary. Moreover, it
can be said that the written vocabulary is the smallest class among the
four classes.
As there are different types of classifications in the English
vocabulary, the teacher must know and choose which type of vocabulary
to teach in the classroom. The teacher should also make sure that the
words introduced in the class are appropriate for the students. The age,
level or abilities of students can be a consideration of the teacher in
choosing the vocabulary to help students learn English.
In learning foreign language for the children is easier when they heard
from their teacher, as Scott and Ytreberg (1992:125) explain when the
students start to learn a foreign language, it though their ears and what
the students hears are their main source of language. Furthermore, they
explain that through facial expression, movement, mime, and pictures as
visual back up in learning foreign language can help in listening process.
Based on the explanation above through storytelling that accompany
with pictures the children are empowering in vocabulary mastery. They
will feel comfortable, interesting, and enjoyable, and the most important
they are not bored in learning English.
4. Teaching Vocabulary
new words. Therefore, the teacher should select new words that are
easily understood by the students.
c. Need
In vocabulary teaching, the teacher should choose the words that
students really need in communication.
d. Frequent exposure and repetition
Frequent exposure and repetition mean that the teacher has to practice
the repetition a lot so that the students have a good command of the
target words. They also give students the opportunity to use words in
writing or speaking.
e. Meaningful presentation
When teaching vocabulary, the teacher should represent the target words
in such a way that the meaning of the target words is perfect, clear and
unambiguous.
f. Situation and Presentation
Teachers tell students to use words appropriately. The use of words
depends on the situation in which they are used and the person to whom
they are addressed.
In teaching vocabulary, there are a few techniques that can be used in
the classroom. Allen in Setiawan (2010) mentions some vocabulary
teaching techniques that can be prepared and selected. They are as follows:
a. Demonstration
The technique, which belongs to the demonstration, consists in
performing gestures and actions. The teacher can use real objects and
instructions. The teacher can demonstrate the material using real objects
available in the classroom, such as a door, windows, clock, desk, etc.
When using a teaching technique, the teacher can ask students to do
something like touch the pen, touch the image pointer, and so on.
b. Visual aids
Visual means something visible. The teacher can use visual aids when
teaching vocabulary to allow students to clearly observe and identify
10
5. Assesing vocabulary
6. Definition of Storytelling
a) The setting
Setting is such a description of time, place, character, and context that
you provide something for the audience to mentally imagine and feel
part of.
b) Build up
Build up is a sequence of events that warns the listener that something
(usually some type of conflict) is about to happen. This creates tension,
interest and attention.
c) Crisis
The crisis is therefore the apogee or culmination of history. It is also the
place to introduce a new element and/or a turning point.
d) Learning
Learning is such a point to explain what the main character has learned.
Herein lies the lesson of history.
B. Previous Study
A review on the previous study is applied to know whether the result
of the previous and present research is the same or different. There have
been three research on the previous study.
1. The first previous study is titled "Improving student vocabulary mastery
through storytelling strategy and hand puppet media", conducted by
Nasikhah Roikhatun, Bashir M Pairin Udjang, Fajarina Maskhurin, in
October 2019. This study used Classroom Action Research (CAR) with
approach quantity. The population in this study consisted of students
from SDN Keras 1 Diwek Jombang class VI, the number of 20 students.
The conclusions of this study were significant for puppet storytelling
strategy and media to improve students' vocabulary mastery. This is
demonstrated by the students' average pre-test score at 38.3 and the
average post-test score in Cycle 1 at 79.63. In Cycle 2, the students'
average score was 42.965 on the pre-test and 80.63 on the post-test.
2. The second previous study is titled “Improving Student Vocabulary
Skills Through TPR Storytelling” conducted by Rusiana and
Nuraeningsih in 2016. The design of this study was Classroom Action
Research (CAR). The subject of this study was second grade student
number 20 of a private primary school in Kudus, Central Java,
Indonesia. This research examined the impact of TPRS on students'
15
C. Hypothesis
As an alternative answer of the research question, the researcher formulates
the following hypothesis such as:
1. Alternative hypothesis (Ha): There is significant difference of the
students’ vocabulary mastery who taught by using storytelling
techniques.
2. Null hypothesis (Ho): There is no significant difference of the students’
vocabulary mastery who taught by using storytelling techniques.
17
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHOD
A. Research Design
In this research, the researcher conducted quantitative method. The
researcher was applied a quasi-experimental design. In this research used
Cluster Random Sampling. Quasi experimental design is a type of research
design that have control group and experimental group were not chosen
randomly. It means there are two group in this research, one class as
experimental group and one class as the control group. In accordance with
the research design, before being given treatment, both of the experimental
group and the control group given a pretest to find out the score before being
given a treatment.
This design can be described as follows:
Class Pre-test Treatment Post-test
Experiment O1 X O2
Control O3 - O4
Table 1. Research design
Description:
E = Experimental Group
C = Control Group
X = Treatment using storytelling
O1 = Pre-test experimental class
O3 = Pre-test control class
O2 = Post-test experimental class
O4 = Post-test control class
18
Pre-test Pre-test
Post-test Post-test
2. Sample
According to (Sugiyono, 2013: 117), the sample is part of the population
and property size. The sample of this research is students from 5th grade Ar
Rozy as experimental class and 5th grade Ibnu Rusyd as control class in SD
IT Samawi Yogyakarta.
X Y
F. Research Instruments
According to Arikunto (2019, hlm. 203) research instrument is tools or
facilities used by researcher in collecting data so that their work is easier
and the result are better, more accurate, complete, and systematic so that
they are easier to process. The type of instrument is a test. The test was about
food and drink. Test has been given on the pre-test and post-test consisting
of 15 multiple choices, which was to find out students’ vocabulary mastery
of the fifth grade at SD IT Samawi Yogyakarta.
21
Blueprint Instrument
(a) If the value of Significance was higher than 5% alpha (Sig. > 0.05), it
can be concluded that the data was normal distribution.
(b) If the value of Significance was less than 5% alpha (Sig. < 0.05), it can
be concluded that the data was not normal distribution.
2. Homogeneity Test
The homogeneity test aims to determine whether the sample of the
population has the same variance or does not show significant
differences from each other. The interpretation of the homogeneity test
results is done by observing the value of significance (Sig.).
The interpretation can be concluded as follows:
(a) If the significance is less than 0.05 (Sig. < 0.05), the variants different
significantly (not homogeneous).
(b) If the significance is higher than 0.05 (Sig. > 0.05), the variants are
significantly similar (homogeneous).
3. Hypothesis Test
For the Hypothesis test, the researcher used t-test to find out whether
or not there is a significant difference between the post-test results of
the experimental class and the control class. The t-test in this study was
conducted twice. First, t-test for pre-test data which is to find out the
initial condition of the research subject of two group. Second, calculate
the t-test for the post-test data to find out the effect of the teaching and
learning process that can be seen based on the final condition of the
research subject after being given treatment.
To process the data, the researcher was using SPSS program version
25. For the criteria for accepting and rejecting hypothesis are as follows:
(a) If the result t-hitung > t-tabel, then alternative hypothesis (Ha) was
acccepted and null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected.
(b) If the result t-hitung < t-tabel, then alternative hypothesis (Ha) was
rejected and null hypothesis (Ho) was accepted.
24
CHAPTER IV
RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION
A. Data Description
In the data description, the researcher firstly wanted to propose and to
explain more about the description of teaching and learning processes both
in the control and experimental class when this study was held, but the
researcher just explained the main point of teaching, because the detail
activities can be seen and read in the lesson plans had been made. This study
was held in July18, 2022 and taken place in SD IT Samawi Yogyakarta. The
subject of this research was students from 5th grade Ar Rozy as experimental
class and 5th grade Ibnu Rusyd as control class. Teaching vocabulary
material food and drink was conducted in the three meetings both in the
control and experimental class. In SD IT Samawi, the English course was
taught once in a week with 60 minutes duration. Therefore, the researcher
needed one month to conduct this study. The schedule of the pretest,
treatment, and posttest are shown in Table 3 below.
The first class to be taught was the control class namely class Ibnu
Rusyd where the teacher taught using lecturing method without any media.
The next class was the experimental class that was in class Ar Rozy where
the teacher taught using storytelling. The detailed explanation of teaching
vocabulary would be clarified as follows.
1. Teaching and learning vocabulary in the control class using lecturing
method
The control class was carried out by using conventional teaching or
lecturing method. The english teacher taught material food and drink
without any method and media. The experimenter was the English teacher,
whereas the researcher just observed what the teacher did in the classroom.
In this class, teaching was done in three meetings that were in july 28 and
august 4 and 11. The first meeting was held in july 21 in the class 5 Ibnu
Rusyd. Time duration of teaching was 60 minutes.
26
Similar to the control class, firstly, the teacher started teaching by giving
greeting to the learners and checked the attendance list. The number of the
students at that time was 24. After greeting, pray together and the teacher
gave some brainstorming regarding the materials that would be explained in
order that the students were easy to understand the topic given by the
teacher, the materials was about food and drink. First meeting, the teacher
gave vocabulary of food and drink and asked the students to pronounce
them. The second meeting, the teacher divided the students into 3 groups
consist of 8 students. Then the teacher gives worksheet and pieces of paper
with picture of food and drink. The teacher started to storytelling. After that
the teacher give instruction to the students to doing worksheet according to
the story and put the picture correctly. In the third meeting, the teacher
explained how to make simple senteces about food and drink. The students
listened to the teacher explanation and copy what the teacher wrote on the
white board in their notebook. After that, the teacher asked the students to
make sentences with their friend then came forward in front of the class to
have a dialog.
28
From the table and the diagram above, the students’ most frequent
scores were in interval 58,4-63,4. It can be concluded that the majority of
the students belonged to a medium category in the pre-test.
b. Post-test
A post-test of experimental class aims to find out the score of the
students after given treatment. From the post-test, data showed the highest
score was 93.3 and the lowest score was 60.
By using SPSS, it is known that the average score (mean) achieved by
student in the experimental class post-test was 76.6; mode was 73.3; median
was 76.6; and the standard deviation was 9.4261. The frequency distribution
of post-test scores of Vocabulary skills with the experimental Class are
shown in Table 5 below.
Total 24 100
Table 5. Frequency Distribution of the Experimental Class Post-test
From the table and the diagram above, the students’ most frequent
scores taught using storytelling were in interval 78-83. It can be concluded
that the majority of the students belonged to an advanced or a very good
category in the post-test.
2. Control Class
a. Pre-test
The control class is the class taught without using storytelling, instead
of using lecturing method. A pretest was conducted to find out the result of
the vocabulary test. Subjects in the control class pre-test are 26 students.
From the results of the pre-test, data showed the highest score achieved by
students was 80 and the lowest score was 46.6.
By using SPSS, it is known that the average score (mean) achieved by
student in the control class pre-test was 63.5; mode was 60; median was
63.3; and the standard deviation was 8.8931. The frequency distribution of
pre-test scores of Vocabulary skills with the control Class are shown in
Table 6 below.
31
From the table and the diagram above, the students’ most frequent
scores were in interval 56,8-61,8. It can be concluded that the majority of
the students belonged to a medium category in the pre-test.
b. Post-test
A post-test of the control class aimed to find out outcomes of learning
of vocabulary without using storytelling. From the results of the post-test,
data showed the highest score achieved by students was 86.6 and the lowest
score was 53.3.
By using SPSS, it is known that the average score (mean) achieved by
student in the control class pre-test was 70.4; mode was 73.3; median was
32
73.3; and the standard deviation was 9.4552. The frequency distribution of
post-test scores of Vocabulary skills with the control Class are shown in
Table 7 below.
From the table and the diagram above, the students’ most frequent
scores taught using lecturing method were in interval 68,6-73,6. It can be
concluded that the majority of the students belonged to a good category in
the post-test.
33
C. Data Analysis
Before testing the hypothesis, the data needed to be tested for normality
and homogeneity. Normality test was used to know whether the data were
in the normal distribution or not, whereas homogeneity was applied to know
whether the data were homogenous or not. In this study, the data used t-test
was pre-test and post-test.
1. Normality Test
Normality test is used to find out whether the data obtained normally
distributed or not. It can be said normal distribution if the value of
probability or significance was higher than significance level 5% or 0.05.
The researcher used Kolmogorov-Smirnov in SPSS Program version 25 in
testing normality to know and investigate whether the sample came from
normal distribution population or not. The result of the normality test is
presented as follows.
Based on the table above, it can be concluded that the distribution of the
data of pre-test and post-test both experimental and control Class are
normal. It can be seen from the value of sig. which was higher than 0.05
(Sig. > 0.05).
2. Homogeneity Test
Test of homogeneity was conducted to know whether all groups were
similar or not. The Levene-Test was employed to test the homogeneity. Data
is said to be homogeneous if the significance value was higher than 0.05
(significance level). The result of homogeneity test is presented as follows.
34
Based on the table above, it can be concluded that the significance value
of post-test (0.931) was higher than 0.05. It means that the sample variance
was homogeneous.
3. Hypothesis Test
After the data normal distribution and homogeneous, the next processes
were hypothesis testing. The hypothesis testing is aimed to find out any
significant differences between vocabulary class taught by using
storytelling and class taught by lecturing method for the fifth graders at SD
IT Samawi Yogyakarta. Hypothesis testing in this study used the t-test
namely independent sample t-test in analyzing data.
1) t-test of Pre-test Experimental and Control Class
t-test in this step is aimed to find out any significant differences between
pre-test result of the experimental class and control class. The research
hypotheses used independent sample t-test was as follows.
Ho: There is no significant difference in the pre-test results of the
experimental class with control class.
Ha: There is significant difference in the pre-test results of the
experimental class with control class.
In conclusion, if the value of significance is less than 0.05, then
Alternative Hypothesis (Ha) is accepted. It means there is significant
difference in the pre-test results of the experimental class with control class.
While, if the value of significance is higher than 0.05, then Alternative
Hypothesis (Ha) is rejected and Null Hypothesis (Ho) is accepted. It means
there is no significant difference in the pre-test results of the experimental
class with control class. The result of the pre-test T-test can be seen in the
following table below:
35
Based on the table above, the result of the analysis of t-test show that
the value of tcount was 1.488 and the value of significance (Sig) was 0.143.
The value of significance (Sig.) was higher than 0.05. Then, it can be stated
that Alternative Hypothesis (Ha) was rejected and Null Hypothesis (Ho)
was accepted. It means that There is no significant difference in the pre-test
results of the experimental class with control class. So, it can be concluded
that the experimental and control class have the same ability.
2) t-test of Post-test Experimental and Control Class
t-test is aimed to find out any significant differences between post-test
result of the experimental class and control class. The research hypotheses
used independent sample t-test was as follows.
Ho: There is no significant difference in the post-test results of the
experimental class with control class.
Ha: There is significant difference in the post-test results of the
experimental class with control class.
In conclusion, if the value of significance is less than 0.05, then
Alternative Hypothesis (Ha) is accepted. It means there is significant
difference in the post-test results of the experimental class with control
class. While, if the value of significance is higher than 0.05, then Alternative
Hypothesis (Ha) was rejected. and Null Hypothesis (Ho) is accepted. It
means there is no significant difference in the post-test results of the
experimental class with control class. The result of the post-test t-test can
be seen in the following table below:
36
Based on the table above, the result of the analysis of t-test show that
the value of tcount was 2.304 and the value of significance (Sig) was 0.026.
The value of significance (Sig.) was smaller than 0.05. Then, it can be stated
that Alternative Hypothesis (Ha) was accepted and Null Hypothesis (Ho)
was rejected. It means that there was significant difference in the post-test
results of the experimental class taught by using storytelling with the control
class whose taught by using lecturing method.
D. Discussion
This section presented the discussion of research finding proposed
before mainly focused on the hypothesis testing. This study aimed to know
the effectiveness between methods in teaching vocabulary namely the using
storytelling and conventional way or lecturing method toward the students’
achievement in vocabulary of food and drink to fifth grade students at SD
IT Samawi Yogyakarta used both in the control and experimental class. It
was also definitely to know the students’ scores in vocabulary. In this study,
the researcher just used a test as a tool to collect the data, because the
researcher just wanted to know the students’ vocabulary.
the words and understand the sentence easily. This was different from
lecturing method where the students learned without media in learning
vocabulary. The teacher just explained materials more in front of class.
Therefore, the students were bored and not motivated in learning
vocabulary.
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion
Based on the results of the research and discussion that has been
presented in the previous chapter, it can be concluded that there was
significant differences in learning outcomes of the students who learned
vocabulary using storytelling with the students who learned without
storytelling. This can be shown by the results of t-test of experimental group
post-test and control group. The value of significance (Sig.) was higher than
significant level (0.026 < 0.05), then Ha was accepted. In addition, it can be
seen also from the average of experimental class post-test was 76.6 which
was higher than the average of control class post-test was 70.4. This shows
that learned by using storytelling that supported by picture was effective to
be used in teaching vocabulary for the fifth grade students of SD IT Samawi
Yogyakarta.
B. Suggestion
Based on the conclusion of the research, the researcher suggests for the
following parties: the teachers, the students, and other researchers.
1. English Teacher
The application of media and interesting method in teaching vocabulary
should be also considered and supported by English teachers to make
students become motivated and enthusiastic in learning rather than using
conventional teaching.
2. The Students of English Education Department
The students of English Education Department had to develop the using
of storytelling as a teaching technique in teaching vocabulary. In order
storytelling can be more effective and efficient technique in vocabulary.
40
REFERENCES
Brewster, J., Ellis, G., Girard, D. (2002). The primary English teacher’s guide.
Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Hatch, E., and Cheryl, B. (2001). Vocabulary, Semantics and Language Education.
England: Cambridge University Press.
Hiebert, E.H., and Michael, L.K. (2005). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary:
Bringing Research to Practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
Inc.
Jalongo, M.R. (2000). Early Childhood Language Arts. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
42
APPENDICES
45
This is
a. Rice
b. Cake
c. Egg
d. Noodle
2.
3.
a. Fried rice
b. Fried chicken
c. Egg
d. Cake
4. “semangka” in English is
a. Apple
b. Oranges
c. Banana
d. Watermelon
5. “bayam” in English is
a. Onion
b. Egg
c. Celery
d. Spinach
6. Eat – I – chicken – like to
Arrange into a good sentence
a. I eat like to chicken
b. I like to eat chicken
c. I eat chicken like to
d. I chicken like to eat
7. My mother buys in the supermarket. (keju)
a. Meat
b. Fried chicken
c. Egg
d. Cheese
8. There are kinds of drink, except
a. Bread
b. Ice tea
c. A cup of coffee
d. Orange juice
47
My name is mala. I and family are having lunch in a restaurant. It is the best
restaurant in magelang. We order the food to the waiter. I order fried rice
and orange juice. My father orders fried chicken and ice tea. My mother
order noodle and apple juice. The food and drinks are very nice. We like
having lunch there.
12. What does mala order ?
a. Fried chicken and ice tea
b. Fried rice and orange juice
c. Noodle and apple juice
d. Noodle and ice tea
13. What does her father order ?
a. Fried chicken and ice tea
b. Fried rice and orange juice
c. Noodle and ice tea
d. Noodle and apple juice
48
Petunjuk :
Berilah tanda centang (√) pada kolom penilaian yang sesuai dengan penilaian ibu
terhadap setiap butir soal dengan skala penilaian sebagai berikut :
1 : Sangat tidak baik 3 : baik
2 : Tidak baik 4 : Sangat baik
Relevansi 5. Pernyataan √
berkaitan dengan
tujuan
penelitian.
6. Pernyataan √
sesuai dengan
aspek ingin
dicapai.
Kevalidasian 7. Pernyataan √
isi mengungkapkan
informasi yang
benar.
Ketepatan 8. Bahasa yang √
bahasa digunakan
mudah
dipahami.
9. Penulisan sesuai √
dengan EYD.
DATA ANALYSIS
1. Descriptive Analysis
2. Normality Test
3. Homogeneity Test
57
4. Hypothesis Test
Used t-test
58
EXPERIMENTAL CLASS
NO NAMA SISWA PRE-TEST POST-TEST
1. Aisyah Nurunnabilah 66.6 73.3
2. Aisyah Umainatulhaq 86.6 93.3
3. Alfu Alfin Niam 60 66.6
4. Aqil Muhammad Musyafak 60 60
5. Arina Putri Naroya 73.3 80
6. Aurora Najwa Sophiana 66.6 73.3
7. Dahayu Ken Nareswari 80 86.6
8. Damar Ragamukti Timur Pambudi 73.3 73.3
9. Dhiya Ulhaq Mufadhol 53.3 60
10. Dimas Eka Fahrudin 53.3 66.6
11. Fahdina Keysa Chalwa 60 80
12. Gusti Nonik Erlinda 53.3 66.6
13. Husnul Rosyidah 66.6 73.3
14. Irsyad Musyaffa Azzam 60 80
15. Jovita Nurulqolbi 60 66.6
16. Kartika Kirani Ayu Jinggan 73.3 73.3
17. Labibah Syarifah 60 80
18. Lisana Shidqin 'Aliya 66.6 73.3
19. Muhammad Fathan Fahriziy 80 86.6
20. Muhammad Shakiy Pramudya Inara 73.3 86.6
21. Natasya Widya Hapsari 66.6 80
22. Sabrina Nava Libna 86.6 93.3
23. Tasya Aura Pertiwi 66.6 86.6
24. Zahra Nadya Aisyaharani 73.3 80
59
CONTROL CLASS
LESSON PLAN
Time : 3 x 60 minutes
A. Core Competence
KI-1 : Menghargai dan menghayati ajaran agama yang dianutnya
KI-2 : Menunjukkan perilaku jujur, disiplin, tanggung jawab, peduli
(toleransi, gotong royong), santun, percaya diri, dalam berinteraksi secara
efektif dengan lingkungan sosial dan alam dalam jangkauan pergaulan dan
keberadaannya
KI-3 : Memahami pengetahuan (faktual, konseptual, dan prosedural)
berdasarkan rasa ingin tahunya tentang ilmu pengetahuan, teknologi, seni,
budaya terkait fenomena dan kejadian tampak mata
KI-4 : Mencoba, mengolah, dan menyaji dalam ranah konkret
(menggunakan, mengurai, merangkai, memodifikasi, dan membuat) dan
ranah abstrak (menulis, membaca, menghitung, menggambar, dan
mengarang) sesuai dengan yang dipelajari di sekolah dan sumber lain yang
sama dalam sudut pandang/teori
C. Learning Objective
1. Meeting 1
➢ The students know the name of food and drink
➢ The students are able to pronounce the word about food and drink
correctly
2. Meeting 2
➢ The students are able to mention the name of food and drink
➢ The students can memorize vocabulary of food and drink
3. Meeting 3
➢ The students can make simple sentence about food and drink
Teaching Activity
Meeting 1
2. Main - The teacher give some - The students mention the name
(25 minutes) question like of food and drink.
• Please mention the - The students pay attention to
name of foods the teacher when she is
• Please mention the explaining the material.
name of drinks - The students write vocabulary
• What your favorite in their notebook.
food? - The student follow the teacher
• What your favorite to pronounce the name of food
drink? and drink
Meeting 2
MEETING 3
He built a small house around himself, called a Cocoon, And he stayed inside for
more than two weeks.
Then he nibbled a hole in the cocoon, pushed his way out, and...
he was a beautiful butterfly.
67
MATERI PEMBELAJARAN
Vocabulary of Food :
- Biscuits = Biskuit
- Bread = Roti
- Brithday Cake = Kue UlangTahun
- Brownrice = Beras Merah
- Burger = burger
- Cake = Kue
- Candy = Permen
- Cereal = Sereal
- Cheese = Keju
- Cookies = Kue Kering
- Corn = Jagung
- Doughnuts = Donat
- Egg = Telur
- Fish = Ikan
- Fried chicken = ayam goreng
- Fried fish = ikan goreng
- Fried rice = nasi goreng
- Fruits = buah-buahan
- Jam = selai
- Meatballs = bakso
- Noodles = Mie
- Omelette = telur dadar
- Pizza = pizza
- Potato Chips = Keripik Kentang
- Pudding = Puding
- Rice = Nasi
- Salad = Salad
- Soup = Sup
- Toast = Daging Panggang
- Vegetables = sayuran
- Sausage = sosis
- Honey = madu
Vegetable (sayuran)
- Cabbage = kubis
- Celery = Seledri.
- Edamame = Kacang kedelai jepang.
- Garlic = Bawang putih.
- Ginger = Jahe.
- Green bean = Buncis.
- Leek = Bawang perai.
69
- Lettuce = Selada.
- Olive = Zaitun.
- Onion = Bawang bombay.
- Peas = Kacang polong.
- Spinach = Bayam
- Red onion = bawang merah
Fruits (buah)
- Papaya = pepaya
- Passion fruit = markisa
- Peach = persik
- Pear = pir
- Pineapple = nanas
- plum = plum
- Strawberry = stroberi
- Watermelon = semangka
- Apple = apel
- Banana = pisang
- Cherry pie = buah ceri
- Oranges : jeruk
Drink (Minuman)
- Coffee = kopi
- Tea = teh
- Milk = susu
- Juice = jus
- Water = air
- Hot chocolate = cokelat panas
- Ice cream = es krim
What is your favorite drink? (Apa minuman favorit kamu?) / what do you like to
drink?
My favorite drink is ice tea. (Minuman favorit saya adalah es teh) / I like to drink
a glass of ice tea
Can you make me fried rice? (Bisakah kamu buatkan saya nasi goreng?)
Sure (Tentu bisa)
71
WORKSHEET
Put the picture according to the story that has been heard correctly!
SUNDAY
MONDAY
TUESDAY
WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
SATURDAY
72