Tijani Pro Pro

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 63

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

River channels are dynamic natural systems that constantly change due to various natural and

anthropogenic factors. Understanding these changes is crucial for environmental management,

flood prevention, urban planning, and ecological conservation. The advancement of remote

sensing technology has revolutionized the way we monitor and analyze river channel dynamics.

Remote sensing provides high-resolution, time-series imagery that enables detailed and accurate

analysis of spatial and temporal changes in river channels (Gallo et al., 207).

River systems are among Earth's most dynamic and complex landscapes, playing a crucial role in

shaping the terrestrial environment. These systems serve as vital water sources, support rich

biodiversity, and provide numerous ecosystem services, including transportation, irrigation, and

recreation. However, river channels are constantly evolving due to natural processes and human

activities. This dynamic nature makes them a subject of extensive study in the fields of

geomorphology, hydrology, and environmental science (Gurnell, 2021).

Historically, the study of river channels has involved direct field observations and manual

surveying techniques. Early geomorphologists like William Morris Davis and Luna Leopold laid

the groundwork for understanding river channel morphology and dynamics. Their pioneering

work provided insights into how rivers sculpt landscapes, transport sediments, and respond to

climatic and geological changes. However, traditional field-based methods were limited in

spatial coverage and temporal resolution, making it challenging to capture the full complexity of

riverine environments (Wilcox, 2023).


The integration of remote sensing with geographic information systems (GIS) allows for the

comprehensive analysis and visualization of river channel changes. This approach provides

valuable insights into the patterns and processes of river morphology, sediment transport, and

channel migration. The Department of Surveying and Geo-Informatics is particularly interested

in leveraging these technologies to enhance our understanding of riverine environments and to

support sustainable management practices (Maidment, 2020).

The advent of remote sensing technology has revolutionized the study of river channels. Remote

sensing involves the acquisition of information about the Earth's surface without direct contact,

typically through satellite or aerial imagery. This technology offers several advantages over

traditional methods, including extensive spatial coverage, frequent temporal updates, and the

ability to access remote or hazardous areas (Aijazi et al., 202).

With the launch of the first Earth-observing satellites in the 1960s, such as Landsat, scientists

gained unprecedented access to high-resolution imagery of the Earth's surface. These images

provided detailed information on land cover, vegetation, and hydrological features, enabling

more comprehensive analyses of river systems. Over the decades, advancements in remote

sensing technology, including higher resolution sensors, multispectral and hyperspectral

imaging, and improved data processing techniques, have further enhanced our ability to monitor

and analyze river channels (Gallo et al., 2017).

The integration of remote sensing data with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has opened

new avenues for spatial analysis and visualization. GIS is a powerful tool that allows researchers

to store, manipulate, and analyze spatial data. By combining remote sensing imagery with GIS,

researchers can create detailed maps, model spatial relationships, and analyze temporal changes

in river channels with greater accuracy and efficiency (Malczewski, 2019).


This integration has facilitated numerous applications, such as detecting changes in river course,

assessing sediment transport and deposition patterns, and evaluating the impacts of human

activities like dam construction, land use changes, and urbanization on river dynamics. For

instance, studies have shown how deforestation and urban sprawl can alter hydrological cycles,

increase runoff, and accelerate riverbank erosion, leading to significant changes in river

morphology.

Despite these technological advancements, several challenges remain in the analysis of river

channel changes using remote sensing. One major challenge is the processing and interpretation

of large volumes of remote sensing data. This requires sophisticated algorithms and

computational tools to extract meaningful information from raw images. Additionally, the

accuracy of remote sensing analyses depends on the quality and resolution of the imagery, which

can be affected by factors such as cloud cover, sensor limitations, and data availability (Cohen

and Goward, 2020).

Another challenge is the need for accurate ground truth data to validate remote sensing findings.

Ground truth data, obtained through field surveys or in-situ measurements, are essential for

calibrating remote sensing models and ensuring the reliability of the results. However, collecting

ground truth data can be logistically challenging and resource-intensive, especially in remote or

inaccessible areas.

Furthermore, understanding the drivers of river channel changes requires a multidisciplinary

approach that considers both natural processes (e.g., hydrology, sediment dynamics, climatic

variability) and human influences (e.g., land use changes, dam operations, water extraction).

Addressing these complexities necessitates collaboration across various fields, including

geomorphology, hydrology, environmental science, and remote sensing technology.


The Department of Surveying and Geo-Informatics is particularly well-positioned to address

these challenges due to its expertise in spatial data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation. By

leveraging remote sensing and GIS technologies, the department can contribute to a deeper

understanding of river channel dynamics and support sustainable river management practices.

This research aligns with the department's mission to advance the science and technology of

spatial data management and to apply these advancements to real-world environmental and

societal issues (Foody, 2021).

The analysis of river channel changes using remote sensing images represents a critical area of

research with significant implications for environmental management, flood prevention, urban

planning, and conservation. This study aims to develop a robust methodology for analyzing river

channel changes, thereby contributing to the broader goals of sustainable river management and

environmental stewardship.

1.2 Study Area (Oyan River, Ogun State)

Oyan River is in Abeokuta north L.G.A of Ogun State, within 7°15’30” N and 3°15’20” E. it is a

tributary of the Ogun River. The dam was commissioned on 29 March 1983 by President Shehu

Shagari and is operated by the Ogun-Osun River Basin Development Authority. The lake is in

the savannah region, with sparse trees and grasses and low fertility. It covers 4,000 hectares and

has a catchment area of 9,000 km2. The dam has a crest length of 1044m, a height of 30.4 m, and

a gross storage capacity of 270 million m3 (Ofoezie and Asaolu, 1997). It was designed to

supply raw water to Lagos and Abeokuta and to support the 3,000-hectare Lower Ogun Irrigation

Project. Three turbines of 3 megawatts each were installed in 1983 but as of 2007 had not been

used.
Figure 1a: Satellite image of the study area (Oyan River).
Figure 1b: Map showing Oyan River.
In May 2009, after heavy rainfall the dam operators were forced to release exceptional amounts

of water from the dam for safety reasons, causing some flooding over an area of 2,800

hectares. In February 2010, the dam was failing to deliver sufficient raw water for the Abeokuta

water works to meet demands. The waterworks was also struggling with equipment failure due to

a power surge. Residents of Abeokuta were forced to rely on rivers and streams to meet their

water needs. The Ogun State Water Corporation attributed the problem to the unreliable supply

of electricity from the Power Holding Corporation of Nigeria (Ofoezie and Asaolu, 1997).

The Oyan River is a significant watercourse located in Ogun State, southwestern Nigeria. It is a

tributary of the Ogun River and plays a vital role in the region's hydrology. The river originates

from the Oyan Dam, which was constructed primarily for water supply, irrigation, and flood

control. The Oyan Dam and its reservoir are crucial for providing potable water to Lagos and

Abeokuta, two major cities in Nigeria. The dam also supports agricultural activities and helps

mitigate flooding during the rainy season.

Historically, the Oyan River has undergone significant changes influenced by both natural

factors and human interventions. The construction of the Oyan Dam in the early 1980s has

significantly altered the river's flow regime and sediment transport dynamics. The dam's

operation, coupled with land use changes in the surrounding catchment area, has impacted the

river's morphology and ecosystem. Understanding these changes is essential for effective river

management and for mitigating adverse impacts on communities and environments downstream

(Ofoezie and Asaolu, 1997)..

The Oyan River basin is of great environmental and socioeconomic importance. The river

supports diverse ecosystems, providing habitats for various aquatic and terrestrial species. It is

also integral to the livelihoods of local communities who rely on it for fishing, farming, and other
economic activities. However, the river faces several challenges, including sedimentation,

pollution, and habitat degradation, primarily due to agricultural runoff, industrial discharges, and

deforestation in the catchment area.

Given the dynamic nature of the Oyan River and the impacts of human activities, there is a

critical need for continuous monitoring and analysis. Remote sensing provides a cost-effective

and efficient means to achieve this. By analyzing satellite images over different time periods,

researchers can detect changes in the river's course, identify areas prone to erosion or

sedimentation, and assess the effectiveness of management practices.

1.3 Statement of the Problem

Rivers play a critical role in shaping landscapes and supporting ecosystems. However, changes

in river channels can have significant impacts on human activities, infrastructure, and natural

habitats. Traditional methods of monitoring river channels, such as ground surveys, are often

time-consuming, labor-intensive, and limited in scope. Consequently, there is a need for more

efficient and effective methods to analyze river channel changes over large areas and extended

periods.

Remote sensing offers a powerful tool for addressing this need, but there are challenges

associated with processing and interpreting remote sensing data. These challenges include the

complexity of image analysis, the need for accurate ground truth data, and the potential for data

gaps due to cloud cover or other environmental factors. This study aims to address these

challenges by developing a robust methodology for analyzing river channel changes using

remote sensing images.


1.4 Aim and Objectives of the Study

1.4.1 Aim

The aim of the study is to analyze the Oyan River channel change using remote sensing images.

1.4.2 Objectives

The objectives of the study are:

1. To produce river channel map using Landsat images and map of the study area.

2. To produce the bank erosion map using GIS.

3. To analyze the river channel change.

1.5 Research Questions

This study seeks to answer the following research questions:

1. What are the historical changes in the river channels within the study area?

2. What are the primary factors driving these changes?

3. How can remote sensing images be effectively processed and analyzed to detect river

channel changes?

4. What is the accuracy and reliability of remote sensing data in this context?

5. How can the findings of this study inform river management and conservation practices?
1.6 Significance of the Study

This study is significant for several reasons:

1. Environmental Management and Conservation: Understanding river channel changes

is essential for effective environmental management and conservation.

2. Flood Prevention and Hazard Mitigation: Accurate monitoring of river channels can

help in predicting and preventing floods and can also help to reduce other hazards.

3. Urban Planning: Insights from this study can inform urban planning and infrastructure

development near riverine areas.

4. Technological Advancement: The study contributes to the advancement of remote

sensing and GIS technologies in environmental monitoring.

5. Policy Development: Findings from this research can support the development of

policies and strategies for sustainable river management.

1.7 Scope of the Study

The scope of this study is confined to the analysis of river channel changes using remote sensing

images over a defined study period and area. The study focuses on historical changes in river

channels and does not include predictive modeling of future changes.

1.8 Limitations of the Study

Limitations of the study include the availability and quality of remote sensing data, potential

errors in image processing, and the need for accurate ground truth data for validation. Cloud

cover and atmospheric conditions also hinders the research work.


CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Introduction

The literature review provides an overview of existing research and theoretical frameworks

related to river channel changes, the application of remote sensing and GIS in environmental

monitoring, and specific studies relevant to the Oyan River and similar contexts. This chapter

will examine key themes and findings from previous studies, identify gaps in the current

knowledge, and establish the foundation for the methodology used in this study.

The study of river channel changes is a critical area of research in geomorphology, hydrology,

and environmental science. River channels are constantly shaped and reshaped by natural

processes such as water flow, sediment transport, erosion, and deposition. These processes are

influenced by a combination of climatic factors, geological conditions, and biological activity.

Understanding how river channels change over time is essential for managing water resources,

preventing floods, planning sustainable urban development, and conserving natural habitats.

River channels are dynamic systems that play a crucial role in shaping the Earth's landscape.

They act as conduits for water and sediment transport, influencing the distribution of nutrients

and sediments across floodplains. The morphology of river channels affects river flow velocity,

discharge, and sediment load, which in turn impact riverine ecosystems and human settlements.

Changes in river channels can lead to significant environmental and socioeconomic

consequences, such as altered water availability, increased flood risks, loss of arable land, and

damage to infrastructure.
The study of river channel changes is critical for understanding the dynamics of fluvial systems

and their impact on the surrounding environment. Rivers are dynamic entities that continuously

adjust their channels in response to natural and anthropogenic influences. These changes can

have significant implications for flood management, sediment transport, aquatic habitats, and

land use planning. Recent advancements in remote sensing technology have revolutionized the

way researchers analyze and monitor these changes, providing high-resolution, temporal, and

spatial data that are invaluable for detailed analysis. This study focuses on the Oyan River in

Ogun State, utilizing remote sensing techniques to perform a spatial analysis of river channel

changes over time.

Remote sensing offers a unique advantage in the study of river channels due to its ability to

cover large areas with high temporal frequency and spatial resolution. Traditional methods of

river monitoring, which often involve in-situ measurements and periodic surveys, can be time-

consuming, expensive, and sometimes hazardous. Remote sensing, on the other hand, allows for

the continuous monitoring of river systems in a cost-effective and safe manner. It provides data

that can be used to detect changes in river morphology, flow patterns, and land cover, all of

which are essential for understanding the processes driving river channel changes.

The Oyan River, located in Ogun State, Nigeria, is a vital water resource for the region, serving

multiple purposes including irrigation, water supply, and fisheries. However, like many rivers

around the world, it is subject to various pressures that can lead to significant changes in its

channel. These pressures include natural factors such as seasonal variations in flow and sediment

load, as well as anthropogenic activities such as dam construction, agriculture, and urbanization.

Understanding how these factors influence the river channel is crucial for effective river

management and conservation efforts.


The Oyan River in Ogun State, Nigeria, presents a compelling case for applying remote sensing

and GIS to analyze river channel changes. The Oyan River, a tributary of the Ogun River, is

integral to the region's water resources, supporting agriculture, water supply, and ecosystem

services. The construction of the Oyan Dam and subsequent land use changes in the catchment

area have significantly altered the river's hydrology and morphology. Understanding these

changes is crucial for effective water resource management, flood prevention, and environmental

conservation in the region.

In recent years, numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of remote sensing in

monitoring and analyzing river channel changes. For instance, the use of satellite imagery, aerial

photography, and LiDAR data has provided valuable insights into the spatial and temporal

dynamics of river systems. These technologies have been used to map river channel migration,

identify erosion and deposition areas, and assess the impacts of human activities on river

morphology. The integration of remote sensing data with geographic information systems (GIS)

further enhances the ability to analyze and visualize river channel changes in a comprehensive

manner.

This chapter reviews the existing literature on the use of remote sensing for river channel

analysis, with a specific focus on the methodologies and applications relevant to the Oyan River

case study. It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state of knowledge,

identify gaps in the existing research, and highlight the potential of remote sensing technologies

in advancing our understanding of river channel dynamics. By doing so, it sets the stage for the

subsequent chapters, which will present the methodology, results, and discussion of the spatial

analysis of the Oyan River channel changes using remote sensing data.
The literature review highlights the importance of understanding river channel dynamics and the

potential of remote sensing and GIS in providing detailed, timely, and accurate analyses. While

significant progress has been made in this field, there is a need for more localized studies that

address specific regional challenges. This study aims to fill this gap by focusing on the Oyan

River, leveraging advanced remote sensing technologies and GIS to analyze and understand its

channel changes.

2.2 River Channel Dynamics

River channel dynamics encompass the processes and mechanisms that govern the formation,

alteration, and maintenance of river channels. These dynamics are influenced by a complex

interplay of natural and anthropogenic factors that operate over various spatial and temporal

scales. Understanding river channel dynamics is essential for managing water resources,

mitigating flood risks, and preserving ecological habitats. The study of these dynamics involves

examining the processes that cause changes in channel morphology, such as erosion, sediment

transport, and deposition, as well as the impacts of human activities on these processes. This

section delves into the natural processes influencing river channels, providing a foundation for

understanding the broader context of river channel changes.

2.2.1 Natural Processes Influencing River Channels

River channels are influenced by a variety of natural processes, including hydrological cycles,

sediment transport, erosion, and deposition. Studies by Richards (2024) laid the groundwork for

understanding these processes, highlighting the relationship between river discharge, sediment

load, and channel morphology. Natural processes play a fundamental role in shaping the

morphology and dynamics of river channels. These processes are driven by a complex interplay
of geological, hydrological, and climatic factors, which collectively influence the form and

behavior of river systems. Understanding these natural processes is essential for

comprehensively analyzing river channel changes and their implications for environmental

management.

Natural processes play a fundamental role in shaping river channels and determining their

behavior over time. These processes are driven by the interactions between water flow, sediment

load, and the geological and climatic conditions of the river basin. Key natural processes that

influence river channels include hydrological regime, sediment transport, channel migration, and

vegetation dynamics.

The hydrological regime of a river, which includes the variability in water discharge over time, is

a primary factor influencing river channel morphology. Seasonal fluctuations in precipitation and

snowmelt contribute to variations in river flow, leading to periods of high and low discharge.

High-flow events, such as floods, can cause significant erosion of river banks and the

mobilization of large amounts of sediment, while low-flow periods may result in sediment

deposition and channel stabilization. The frequency, magnitude, and duration of these flow

events are critical in determining the extent and nature of channel changes (Pinter, 2021).

One of the primary natural processes influencing river channels is hydrological variability. River

flow patterns are determined by factors such as precipitation, snowmelt, groundwater discharge,

and surface runoff. Variations in flow rates and discharge volumes result in fluctuations in water

levels and velocities, which exert erosional and depositional forces on river channels. Arifjanov

et al (2022) reveal that high-flow events, such as floods, can erode riverbanks and bed material,

leading to channel widening, bank erosion, and sediment transport downstream. Conversely,
low-flow periods may result in sediment deposition and channel aggradation, altering channel

morphology over time.

Sediment transport is another crucial process affecting river channels. Rivers transport sediment

from their catchment areas to downstream reaches, influencing channel form and behavior. The

amount and size of sediment load are determined by factors such as the geology of the

watershed, land cover, and climatic conditions. Sediment transport processes include bedload

transport, where coarse particles roll or slide along the riverbed, and suspended load transport,

where finer particles are carried within the water column. The balance between sediment supply

and transport capacity dictates whether a river will experience aggradation (sediment buildup) or

degradation (channel incision) (Knighton, 2020).

Channel migration is a natural process that results from the continuous lateral movement of river

channels over time. This movement is driven by the erosion of the outer banks and deposition on

the inner banks of meandering rivers. Channel migration leads to the formation of features such

as meander bends, oxbow lakes, and point bars. The rate of channel migration is influenced by

factors such as river discharge, sediment load, bank material composition, and vegetation. Over

time, channel migration can result in significant changes in the river’s course and floodplain

morphology (Hooke, 2022).

Vegetation plays a significant role in stabilizing river banks and influencing channel

morphology. Riparian vegetation, which grows along the riverbanks, helps to reduce erosion by

binding soil particles with their root systems. Vegetation can also affect sediment deposition

patterns by trapping sediments during high-flow events. Additionally, the presence of large

woody debris from fallen trees can alter flow patterns and create localized areas of erosion and
deposition. The interaction between vegetation and river dynamics is complex and can vary

depending on the type and density of vegetation present (Gurnell, 2021).

Climate change is increasingly recognized as a significant factor influencing river channel

dynamics. Changes in temperature and precipitation patterns can alter the hydrological regime,

affecting flow variability and sediment transport processes. For instance, increased frequency

and intensity of extreme weather events, such as storms and droughts, can exacerbate erosion and

sediment mobilization. Furthermore, changes in vegetation cover due to shifting climatic

conditions can impact channel stability and morphology. Understanding the implications of

climate change on river dynamics is essential for predicting future channel behavior and

managing riverine environments (Wilcox, 2023).

Erosion and deposition are inherent components of river channel dynamics, driven by the erosive

forces of flowing water and sediment transport. Erosion occurs when the shear stress exerted by

flowing water exceeds the resistance of the riverbed and banks, leading to the detachment and

removal of sediment particles. Bank erosion and bed scouring are common forms of erosion that

contribute to channel widening and deepening. Deposition, on the other hand, occurs when the

flow velocity decreases, causing sediment to settle out of suspension and accumulate on the

riverbed or floodplain. Depositional processes, such as point bar formation and channel avulsion,

can result in channel narrowing and the creation of new landforms within the river corridor

(Trimble, 2015).

Natural processes such as hydrological variability, sediment transport, erosion, and deposition

are fundamental drivers of river channel changes (Bilotta et al., 2022). These processes interact

dynamically, shaping the morphology, sediment dynamics, and ecological characteristics of river

systems. By understanding the mechanisms and interactions of these processes, researchers can
better predict and manage river channel responses to environmental changes and human

interventions.

In conclusion, natural processes such as hydrological variability, sediment transport, channel

migration, and vegetation dynamics are fundamental to understanding river channel dynamics.

These processes interact in complex ways to shape river channels over time, influencing their

morphology and behavior. As this section highlights, a comprehensive understanding of these

natural processes is crucial for studying river channel changes, particularly in the context of the

Oyan River case study.

2.2.2 Human Impacts on River Channels

While natural processes play a significant role in shaping river channels, human activities have

increasingly become a dominant force driving changes in river morphology and behavior.

Anthropogenic impacts on river channels can result from various activities, including

urbanization, agriculture, dam construction, and river engineering projects. These activities can

alter the flow regime, sediment transport dynamics, and vegetation cover of river systems,

leading to profound changes in channel morphology and ecological functioning.

Urbanization is one of the most significant human-induced pressures on river channels. As urban

areas expand, impervious surfaces such as roads, buildings, and parking lots increase, resulting

in higher rates of surface runoff and reduced infiltration. This alteration of the hydrological cycle

can lead to changes in river flow patterns, including increased peak flows and flash flooding.

Additionally, urbanization often involves channelization and straightening of rivers to mitigate

flood risks and create space for development, which can disrupt natural channel processes and

increase erosion and sedimentation rates (Booth, 2021).


Agricultural practices also have a considerable impact on river channels, particularly in

agricultural landscapes where extensive land clearing, drainage, and irrigation are common.

These activities can increase soil erosion and sediment delivery to rivers, leading to elevated

sediment loads and sedimentation in river channels. Excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides

can also result in nutrient pollution and eutrophication, affecting water quality and aquatic

ecosystems. Furthermore, agricultural drainage systems can alter the natural flow regime of

rivers, reducing base flows and exacerbating low-flow conditions (Kleinman et al., 2020).

Dam construction and river engineering projects have profound effects on river channels and

their associated ecosystems. Dams alter the flow regime of rivers by regulating discharge, which

can disrupt natural sediment transport processes and lead to downstream sediment starvation or

accumulation. The trapping of sediment behind dams can also result in channel incision

downstream, altering channel morphology and reducing habitat diversity. Furthermore, dam

operations such as water releases for hydropower generation can cause fluctuations in flow

regimes, impacting downstream ecology and sediment transport dynamics (Poff et al., 2022).

River engineering projects, such as channelization, levee construction, and river training works,

are often implemented to reduce flood risks and facilitate navigation and water supply. While

these projects may provide short-term benefits in terms of flood protection and infrastructure

development, they can have long-term consequences for river channels and ecosystems.

Channelization and levee construction can reduce channel complexity, increase flow velocities,

and disconnect rivers from their floodplains, leading to habitat degradation and loss of

biodiversity. Moreover, these structures can exacerbate erosion and sedimentation problems

downstream, contributing to channel instability and loss of ecosystem services (Bravard et al.,

2023).
In conclusion, human impacts on river channels are pervasive and multifaceted, encompassing a

wide range of activities that alter the natural functioning of river systems. Urbanization,

agriculture, dam construction, and river engineering projects all contribute to changes in river

morphology, flow regimes, and ecological integrity. Understanding the cumulative effects of

these impacts is crucial for effective river management and conservation efforts, particularly in

the context of the Oyan River case study.

2.3 Remote Sensing in River Studies

Remote sensing has emerged as a powerful tool for studying river systems, offering the

capability to collect spatially explicit data over large areas at various spatial and temporal scales.

The application of remote sensing techniques in river studies has revolutionized our

understanding of river dynamics, allowing for the assessment of morphological changes, flow

patterns, and land cover dynamics with unprecedented detail and accuracy. This section explores

the evolution of remote sensing technology and its role in advancing our knowledge of river

systems.

2.3.1 Evolution of Remote Sensing Technology

Remote sensing technology has evolved significantly since the launch of the first Earth-

observing satellites. Early work by Gallo et al (2022) illustrates the development of multispectral

and hyper spectral imaging, which allow for detailed analysis of land and water bodies. Recent

advancements, such as LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and UAV (Unmanned Aerial

Vehicle) imagery, have further enhanced the precision and accessibility of remote sensing data.

The development of remote sensing technology has undergone significant advancements over the

past decades, driven by improvements in sensor technology, data processing techniques, and
satellite platforms. Early remote sensing systems, such as aerial photography and

photogrammetry, provided valuable visual information about river channels and surrounding

landscapes. However, these techniques were limited in spatial coverage and required extensive

manual interpretation (Lechner et al., 2021).

The advent of satellite remote sensing in the 1970s marked a major milestone in the field of river

studies, allowing for the systematic and repeated monitoring of large-scale river systems. Early

satellite missions, such as Landsat and SPOT, provided multispectral imagery that enabled

researchers to analyze land cover, vegetation dynamics, and river morphology over regional and

global scales (Gallo et al., 2017). These satellite systems offered improved spatial resolution and

spectral sensitivity compared to aerial photography, facilitating more detailed analysis of river

channels and floodplain dynamics.

Recent developments in remote sensing technology have further enhanced our ability to study

river systems with higher spatial and temporal resolution. The launch of high-resolution optical

sensors, such as those onboard the WorldView and Pleiades satellites, has enabled the mapping

of river channels and associated features with sub-meter resolution (Kuenzer et al., 2020). These

sensors provide detailed imagery that allows for the identification of small-scale geomorphic

features, such as bars, braided channels, and meander bends, which are critical for understanding

river dynamics at the reach scale.

In addition to optical sensors, the integration of radar and LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging)

technology has expanded the capabilities of remote sensing for river studies. Synthetic Aperture

Radar (SAR) sensors, such as those onboard the Sentinel-1 and RADARSAT satellites, offer all-

weather imaging capabilities and the ability to penetrate cloud cover, making them ideal for

monitoring river dynamics in cloudy and tropical regions (Higgins et al., 2022). LiDAR
technology, on the other hand, provides high-resolution elevation data that can be used to create

detailed digital elevation models (DEMs) of river channels and floodplains, enabling precise

analysis of topographic changes over time (Passalacqua et al., 2019).

The integration of remote sensing data with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has further

enhanced the analytical capabilities for river studies. GIS allows for the integration,

visualization, and analysis of diverse geospatial datasets, enabling researchers to assess the

spatial relationships between river channels, land cover types, and hydrological variables

(Maidment, 2020). Advanced spatial analysis techniques, such as object-based image analysis

and machine learning algorithms, have also been applied to remote sensing data to automate the

detection and classification of river features, streamlining the analysis process and improving

accuracy (Aijazi et al., 2021).

In conclusion, the evolution of remote sensing technology has revolutionized the study of river

systems, providing researchers with unprecedented capabilities to monitor and analyze river

dynamics at various spatial and temporal scales. From early aerial photography to modern

satellite and LiDAR systems, remote sensing has enabled the systematic assessment of river

morphology, flow patterns, and land cover dynamics, advancing our understanding of fluvial

processes and informing effective river management strategies.

2.3.2 Applications in River Channel Analysis

Remote sensing has been widely used to monitor and analyze river channel changes. Works by

Boothroyd et al. (2021) demonstrate the application of satellite imagery in detecting changes in

river courses, identifying erosion and deposition zones, and assessing floodplain dynamics. More
recent studies, such as those by Pathaan et al. (2021), utilize high-resolution satellite data to

analyze temporal changes in river morphology and sediment dynamics.

Remote sensing technologies have a wide range of applications in the analysis of river channels,

providing valuable insights into channel morphology, flow dynamics, and environmental

changes. These applications leverage the spatial and temporal capabilities of remote sensing data

to monitor river systems, assess geomorphic processes, and inform management decisions. This

section explores the diverse applications of remote sensing in river channel analysis, highlighting

its role in advancing our understanding of fluvial dynamics. Some of these applications include:

1. Morphological Analysis: Remote sensing data, including high-resolution imagery and digital

elevation models (DEMs), are used to characterize the morphological features of river channels.

This includes mapping channel morphology, such as meander patterns, channel width, and

sinuosity, as well as identifying geomorphic features such as bars, islands, and cut banks.

Remote sensing enables the quantification of channel geometry and the assessment of changes in

channel morphology over time, providing valuable information for understanding river behavior

and evolution (Cobby et al., 2020).

2. Floodplain Mapping: Remote sensing data are used to delineate and map floodplain extents,

allowing for the identification of areas prone to flooding and the assessment of flood hazard

risks. Optical and radar imagery can be used to detect changes in floodplain vegetation, water

inundation patterns, and flood extent dynamics. Additionally, LiDAR-derived DEMs enable the

characterization of topographic variations within floodplains, facilitating flood modeling and risk

assessment (Yang et al., 2021).


3. Sediment Transport Monitoring: Remote sensing techniques are employed to monitor

sediment transport dynamics in river channels, including the quantification of sediment loads,

erosion and deposition patterns, and channel bed changes. Optical and radar imagery can be used

to track changes in sediment concentrations and turbidity levels, while LiDAR-derived DEMs

enable the estimation of sediment volumes and erosion rates. These data are valuable for

assessing sediment dynamics, sediment budgets, and the impacts of sediment transport on river

morphology (Bilotta et al., 2022).

4. Vegetation Mapping: Remote sensing data are utilized to map and monitor riparian

vegetation along river channels, providing insights into vegetation dynamics, habitat quality, and

ecological functioning. Optical imagery is used to classify land cover types, identify vegetation

communities, and assess vegetation health and productivity. Additionally, LiDAR data can be

used to characterize vegetation structure and biomass, enabling the quantification of carbon

storage and habitat suitability for aquatic and terrestrial species (Sexton et al., 2020).

5. Hydrological Modeling: Remote sensing data are integrated into hydrological models to

simulate river flow dynamics, water balance components, and floodplain inundation processes.

Remote sensing-derived precipitation estimates, evapotranspiration rates, and soil moisture data

are used as inputs for hydrological models, improving their accuracy and reliability.

Furthermore, satellite-based measurements of river discharge and water surface elevation are

used to validate model outputs and calibrate model parameters, enhancing the predictive

capabilities of hydrological models (Jiang et al., 2021).

In summary, remote sensing technology offers a diverse range of applications in the analysis of

river channels, providing valuable data and insights for understanding fluvial dynamics,

monitoring environmental changes, and informing management decisions. From morphological


analysis to floodplain mapping, sediment transport monitoring, vegetation mapping, and

hydrological modeling, remote sensing plays a central role in advancing our understanding of

river systems and supporting sustainable river management practices.

2.4 Integration of Remote Sensing and GIS

The integration of remote sensing and GIS combines the temporal and spectral richness of

remote sensing data with the spatial analysis capabilities of GIS. This synergy enables detailed

and dynamic analysis of environmental changes, offering insights that are not possible with

either technology alone. Integrating remote sensing data with GIS has enabled more

sophisticated spatial analyses and modeling of river systems. Longley et al. (2021) explore the

synergy between remote sensing and GIS, emphasizing their combined use in environmental

monitoring and management.

The integration of remote sensing and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has become

increasingly important in river studies, offering powerful tools for the analysis, visualization, and

interpretation of spatial data. Remote sensing provides valuable imagery and data on river

channels and surrounding landscapes, while GIS enables the organization, manipulation, and

analysis of these data within a spatial context. This section explores the integration of remote

sensing and GIS in river studies, highlighting its benefits and applications, which includes:

1. Image Processing and Analysis: GIS software platforms provide advanced tools for

processing and analyzing remote sensing imagery, allowing for the extraction of information on

river channels, land cover, and terrain characteristics. Remote sensing data, such as satellite

imagery and LiDAR-derived elevation models, can be imported into GIS environments for

preprocessing, including radiometric and geometric corrections, image registration, and


mosaicking. GIS tools enable the generation of derived products, such as land cover

classifications, water indices, and topographic profiles, which are essential for river channel

analysis (Jensen, 2020).

2. Spatial Analysis and Modeling: GIS facilitates spatial analysis and modeling of river

systems by integrating remote sensing data with other geospatial datasets, such as digital

elevation models, hydrological networks, and land use maps. GIS software provides a range of

spatial analysis tools for quantifying landscape metrics, delineating watershed boundaries, and

identifying spatial patterns of river channel changes. Additionally, GIS-based modeling

techniques, such as hydrological modeling, habitat suitability modeling, and flood inundation

modeling, utilize remote sensing data as input parameters to simulate and predict river behavior

and environmental impacts (Longley et al., 2021).

3. Visualization and Communication: GIS enables the visualization and communication of

spatial data and analysis results, providing interactive maps, charts, and graphics for conveying

complex information to stakeholders and decision-makers. Remote sensing imagery and derived

products can be integrated into GIS platforms to create visually compelling maps and 3D

visualizations of river channels and associated features. GIS-based web mapping applications

allow for the dissemination of spatial information to a broader audience, facilitating public

engagement and participation in river management and conservation efforts (Kraak and

Ormeling, 2020).

4. Decision Support Systems: GIS serves as a decision support system (DSS) for river

management and planning by integrating remote sensing data with decision-making processes.

GIS-based DSS enable stakeholders to assess the impacts of proposed actions on river systems,

evaluate alternative management scenarios, and prioritize conservation efforts. Remote sensing
data provide valuable inputs for assessing baseline conditions, monitoring changes over time,

and identifying areas of concern or opportunity. By integrating remote sensing and GIS,

decision-makers can make informed decisions that balance ecological, social, and economic

considerations in river management (Malczewski, 2019).

In summary, the integration of remote sensing and GIS offers a powerful framework for river

studies, providing valuable tools for data processing, spatial analysis, visualization, and decision

support. By combining remote sensing imagery and data with GIS capabilities, researchers and

practitioners can gain a comprehensive understanding of river systems, assess environmental

changes, and develop effective management strategies for sustainable river stewardship.

2.6 Gaps in the Literature

Despite the extensive research on river channel dynamics and the application of remote sensing,

several gaps remain. There is a need for more localized studies that combine high-resolution

remote sensing data with detailed ground truth observations. Additionally, while many studies

focus on large river systems, smaller tributaries like the Oyan River are less studied, particularly

in the context of sub-Saharan Africa.

While remote sensing and GIS technologies have significantly advanced our ability to study river

systems, there remain several gaps and challenges in the existing literature. Identifying these

gaps is crucial for guiding future research directions and improving the effectiveness of remote

sensing and GIS applications in river studies. This section highlights some of the key gaps in the

literature:

1. Spatial and Temporal Resolution: One of the primary limitations of remote sensing data is

the trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. While high-resolution imagery provides
detailed information on river channels and associated features, it often comes at the expense of

temporal coverage. Conversely, low-resolution imagery may lack the spatial detail necessary for

detecting small-scale changes in river morphology. Future research should focus on integrating

multi-resolution and multi-temporal datasets to overcome these limitations and provide

comprehensive coverage of river systems over time (Bunting et al., 2021).

2. Data Fusion and Integration: Integrating data from multiple remote sensing platforms and

sensors poses challenges in terms of data compatibility, calibration, and validation. Different

sensors may have varying spatial, spectral, and radiometric characteristics, making it challenging

to combine datasets for seamless analysis. Future research should explore advanced data fusion

techniques, such as machine learning algorithms and spectral unmixing, to integrate

heterogeneous remote sensing data and improve the accuracy and reliability of river analyses

(Cohen and Goward, 2020).

3. Automated Analysis Techniques: Manual interpretation of remote sensing data can be time-

consuming and subjective, particularly for large-scale river studies. While automated analysis

techniques, such as object-based image analysis and machine learning algorithms, offer

promising solutions for streamlining data processing and feature extraction, their effectiveness

may be limited by data availability, algorithm complexity, and training data requirements. Future

research should focus on developing robust and scalable automated analysis techniques tailored

to the specific challenges of river channel analysis (Hassan et al., 2019).

4. Uncertainty Assessment: Assessing the uncertainty associated with remote sensing-derived

products and GIS-based analyses is essential for interpreting results and making informed

decisions. However, quantifying uncertainty in river studies is challenging due to the complex

interactions between data sources, processing methods, and environmental variables. Future
research should prioritize uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis techniques to quantify

and communicate the uncertainties inherent in remote sensing and GIS analyses, improving the

reliability and credibility of study findings (Foody, 2021).

5. Stakeholder Engagement and Capacity Building: Effective utilization of remote sensing

and GIS technologies in river management requires collaboration and capacity building among

stakeholders, including researchers, practitioners, policymakers, and local communities.

However, there is often a disconnection between technical expertise and end-user needs,

hindering the uptake and application of remote sensing and GIS tools in real-world contexts.

Future research should prioritize stakeholder engagement and participatory approaches to bridge

this gap, fostering knowledge exchange, skill development, and co-design of solutions for river

management and conservation (Brouwer et al., 2022).

In conclusion, while remote sensing and GIS technologies offer powerful tools for studying river

systems, there are several gaps and challenges that need to be addressed to realize their full

potential. By addressing these gaps through interdisciplinary research, technological innovation,

and stakeholder engagement, we can enhance our understanding of river dynamics and support

more effective and sustainable river management practices.

2.7 Review of Related Literature

The literature related to the analysis of river channel change using remote sensing images is

extensive and covers various aspects of river geomorphology, hydrology, remote sensing

technology, and GIS applications. Numerous studies have investigated the use of remote sensing

data, including satellite imagery, aerial photography, LiDAR, and radar data, for monitoring

river channels and assessing changes in their morphology over time. These studies have provided
valuable insights into the drivers of river channel change, the impacts of human activities, and

the effectiveness of remote sensing and GIS techniques for river management and conservation.

Several studies have focused on the application of remote sensing techniques for mapping and

monitoring river morphology and dynamics. For example, research by Smith et al. (2020) used

high-resolution satellite imagery to assess changes in channel width, meander patterns, and

sediment deposition in a braided river system. Their study demonstrated the utility of remote

sensing data for quantifying spatial and temporal variations in river morphology and identifying

geomorphic controls on channel evolution (Smith et al., 2020).

Other studies have explored the use of LiDAR-derived elevation data for characterizing river

topography and assessing floodplain inundation dynamics. For instance, Jones et al. (2019)

utilized airborne LiDAR data to create detailed DEMs of river channels and floodplains,

enabling the mapping of flood extent and the analysis of floodplain connectivity. Their research

highlighted the importance of high-resolution elevation data for accurately modeling flood

hazards and informing flood risk management strategies (Jones et al., 2019).

In addition to morphological analysis, remote sensing data have been employed to study

hydrological processes and flow dynamics in river systems. Research by Chen et al. (2021)

utilized satellite-derived precipitation data and river discharge measurements to analyze the

temporal variability of flow regimes and identify hydrological trends in a large river basin. Their

study demonstrated the potential of remote sensing data for assessing hydrological changes and

understanding the drivers of river flow variability (Chen et al., 2021).

Furthermore, numerous studies have investigated the impacts of human activities on river

channels and the environment using remote sensing and GIS techniques. For example, research
by Wang et al. (2022) combined satellite imagery and GIS analysis to assess the effects of land

use change on sediment transport and channel morphology in an urbanizing watershed. Their

study revealed significant alterations in river channels due to urbanization, highlighting the

importance of considering anthropogenic influences in river management planning (Wang et al.,

2022).

Overall, the review of related literature indicates a growing body of research focused on the

analysis of river channel change using remote sensing images. These studies have demonstrated

the effectiveness of remote sensing and GIS techniques for monitoring river dynamics, assessing

environmental changes, and informing management decisions. However, there are still gaps and

challenges that need to be addressed, including issues related to data resolution, accuracy, and

uncertainty. Future research should continue to explore innovative remote sensing and GIS

approaches for studying river systems and advancing our understanding of fluvial processes.
CHAPTER THREE

METHODOLOGY

3.1 Data Acquisition

Remote sensing images were obtained from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Earth

Explorer database, a comprehensive repository of satellite imagery, Landsat 5 TM (Thematic

Mapper) images from 2002 and 2011 were downloaded, along with a Landsat 8 OLI

(Operational Land Imager) image from 2023. These images have a spatial resolution of 30

meters, suitable for analyzing river channel changes at a medium scale. The selection of Landsat

5 and 8 images was based on their availability, cloud cover, and seasonality to ensure optimal

conditions for analyzing river channel dynamics. The 2002 image represents a baseline

condition, while the 2011 and 2023 images enable the assessment of changes over a 21-year

period.
3.2 Methodology Flowchart

The methodology flowchart shows the processes involved in the research.

Figure 3.1 Methodology Flowchart


3.3 Study Area Delineation

Google Earth Pro was employed to delineate the Oyan River basin, leveraging its capabilities for

visual interpretation and spatial analysis. The software enabled the precise outlining of the study

area, taking into account the river’s meandering path, tributaries, and adjacent land cover

features.

The delineation process involved:

 Visual interpretation of satellite imagery and topographic maps

 Identification of river channel boundaries and adjacent land cover features

 Manual digitization of the study area using Google Earth Pro’s polygon tool

 Generation of a shapefile (polygon) defining the Oyan River basin

This shapefile was subsequently used to extract the relevant remote sensing data, ensuring

accurate spatial referencing and analysis.

3.4 Data Processing (image reprocessing and Image enhancement)

Data processing is a crucial step in remote sensing analysis, ensuring that the collected data is

accurate, consistent, and reliable. This section outlines the procedures employed to prepare and

analyze the Landsat 5 and 8 images.

3.4.1 Image Processing

Image processing is the initial step in data processing aiming to correct for geometric and

radiometric distortions, and atmospheric effects. Geometric correction explains the importance of

georeferencing and the method used, radiometric correction describes the need for calibration
and the sensor calibration models used. Atmospheric correction discusses the Dark Object

Subtraction (DOS) method and its purpose.

3.4.2 Image Enhancement

Image enhancement techniques improve image quality, facilitating feature extraction and

analysis. This includes contrast stretching and filtering. Feature extraction is also an important

process in data processing. It involves identifying and extracting relevant information from the

preprocessed images, such as river channel boundaries, water extent and land cover classes.

3.5 River Bank Erosion Mapping

River bank erosion mapping involves the systematic assessment and visualization of erosion

patterns along riverbanks. This process is crucial for understanding the dynamics of river

systems, identifying areas at high risk of erosion, and developing effective management

strategies. The mapping typically involves the use of remote sensing technologies, such as

satellite imagery and aerial photography, alongside Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to

create detailed and accurate maps. These maps can reveal changes in riverbank positions over

time, highlight areas of significant erosion, and help predict future erosion trends based on

historical data.

The methodology for river bank erosion mapping often includes the collection and analysis of

spatial data at multiple time intervals. High-resolution images are compared to detect changes in

the riverbank's position and structure. Field surveys and ground truthing are also essential

components, as they validate the data obtained from remote sensing. Advanced techniques, like

LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), are increasingly being used to create precise 3D models
of riverbanks. These models provide a comprehensive view of the erosion process, including the

volume of soil loss and sediment deposition patterns.

Effective river bank erosion mapping has significant implications for environmental

management, infrastructure protection, and community safety. It aids in the design of erosion

control measures, such as the construction of retaining walls and the implementation of

vegetation buffers. Furthermore, it informs policy-making by providing evidence-based insights

into erosion risks and the impacts of human activities and natural events, such as floods and

storms. By proactively addressing river bank erosion, communities can reduce the potential for

property damage, loss of agricultural land, and adverse ecological effects, thereby promoting

sustainable river basin management.

3.6 River Channel Change Detection

River channel change detection involves monitoring and analyzing the alterations in river

morphology over time. This process is crucial for understanding the dynamics of river systems,

which can be influenced by natural events such as floods, landslides, and sediment deposition, as

well as human activities like dam construction, land use changes, and river engineering.

Detecting these changes helps in managing water resources, preventing flood hazards, and

conserving aquatic habitats. The methods used for river channel change detection range from

traditional field surveys to advanced remote sensing techniques, providing data that informs river

management and environmental protection strategies.

Technological advancements have significantly enhanced the precision and efficiency of river

channel change detection. Remote sensing technologies, such as satellite imagery and aerial
photography, allow for the collection of high-resolution spatial data over large areas. Geographic

Information Systems (GIS) and digital elevation models (DEMs) are employed to analyze and

visualize changes in river morphology, providing detailed information on channel width, depth,

and meander patterns. Additionally, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technology offers

three-dimensional mapping capabilities, capturing fine-scale topographic variations and enabling

the detection of subtle changes in river channels that might be missed by other methods.

The implications of river channel change detection are far-reaching, impacting ecological health,

infrastructure planning, and disaster preparedness. For instance, understanding how river

channels evolve can help predict areas susceptible to erosion or flooding, allowing for the

implementation of mitigation measures. It also aids in the restoration of degraded river systems,

ensuring the maintenance of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Moreover, by tracking changes

over time, policymakers and scientists can evaluate the effectiveness of river management

practices, adjust them as needed, and develop more resilient strategies in response to

environmental and climatic changes.

3.7 Spatial Analysis

Spatial analysis examines the spatial relationships and patterns in the extracted features. This

includes change detection, spatial autocorrelation, and spatial modeling. Change detection

identifies changes in river channel morphology between images with the aid of image

differencing and object-based change detection. Spatial autocorrelation analysis evaluates the

spatial distribution of river channel changes.

3.8 Methodology Overview


The methodology employed in this study encompasses a systematic approach to analyzing river

channel changes using remote sensing and GIS technologies. This section provides an

overarching summary of the various steps, tools, and techniques utilized throughout the research,

ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the entire process. The methodology is designed to

ensure accuracy, reliability, and relevance of the results in understanding the dynamics of the

Oyan River channel.

3.8.1 Data Acquisition

The study begins with the acquisition of primary data, which includes Landsat images and a

shape file for the study area. The specific datasets used are:

 Landsat 5 TM images for the years 2002 and 2011 were downloaded from the USGS

Earth Explorer platform.

 Landsat 8 OLI image for the year 2023 was also acquired from the USGS Earth

Explorer.

 Study area delineation was carried out using Google Earth Pro to create a shapefile,

which was used to define the boundaries of the Oyan River study area.

3.8.2 Data Processing

The raw data underwent several preprocessing steps to ensure it was suitable for analysis:

 Cloud Cover Assessment and Masking: Selected images with less than 10% cloud

cover and applied cloud masking algorithms.

 Radiometric and Atmospheric Corrections: Performed corrections to enhance image

quality and accuracy.


 Georeferencing and Reprojection: Ensured all images were aligned to the same

coordinate system for accurate spatial comparison.

 Study Area Extraction: Cropped images using the study area shapefile to focus analysis

on the Oyan River.

3.8.3 Spatial Analysis

The core of the methodology involves various spatial analysis techniques to detect and quantify

changes in the river channel:

 Change Detection Analysis: Employed image differencing, ratioing, and post-

classification comparison to identify changes in river morphology and surrounding land

cover.

3.8.4 GIS Integration

The processed data and analysis results were integrated into a GIS platform for visualization,

further analysis, and interpretation:

 Spatial Analysis: Combined various spatial data layers to explore relationships and

interactions between different factors.

 Visualization and Mapping: Generated thematic maps to visually represent changes and

facilitate understanding of spatial dynamics.

3.8.5 Interpretation and Validation

The final steps involved interpreting the results and ensuring their accuracy:

Accuracy Assessment involves validating results by consistent checking to ensure reliability.


3.9 Summary

The methodology for this study on the Oyan River involves a detailed, step-by-step approach

encompassing data acquisition, processing, spatial analysis, GIS integration, and interpretation.

By leveraging remote sensing and GIS technologies, this study provides a robust framework for

understanding and managing river channel changes. The comprehensive approach ensures that

the findings are accurate, reliable, and relevant for informing river management and conservation

efforts.
CHAPTER FOUR

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Introduction

This chapter presents the findings from the spatial analysis of the Oyan River channel using

remote sensing data and GIS techniques. The discussion interprets these findings in the context

of natural and anthropogenic influences on river dynamics. The results are structured to first

detail the observed changes in the river channel over the study periods, followed by an analysis

of these changes and their implications.

4.2 Results

4.2.1 Change Detection Analysis

The change detection analysis was conducted using Landsat images from 2002, 2011, and 2023

to identify alterations in the Oyan River channel and creating a Land Use Land Cover Maps of

each year.

a. Land Use Land Cover Maps

Land Use Land Cover Maps of Oyan River for the year 2002, 2011 and 2023 were created, to

facilitate the extraction and determination of the River Channel Changes.


Figure 4.1 Land Use Land Cover Map of 2002
Figure 4.2 Land Use Land Cover Map of Oyan River (2011)
Figure 4.3 Land Use Land Cover Map of Oyan River (2023)
In 2002, it was observed that the vegetation was smaller in size compared to that of 2011 and

2023, which indicates that the vegetation body increases with time. This could be as a result of

hydrological change (increase in flow velocity), climatic conditions or human activities

(Afforestation).

b. River Channel Maps

The map of the flow pattern (River Channel) of the river was created for each year. The

overlayed River Channel map was also created, and the maps (River Channel and Overlayed

River Channel Maps) are shown below.


Figure 4.4 River Channel Map of Oyan River (2002)
Figure 4.5 River Channel Map of Oyan River (20011)
Figure 4.6 River Channel Map of Oyan River (2023)
Figure 4.7 Overlayed River Channel Map of Oyan River (2002-2023)
c. Accretion and Erosion Maps

Figure 4.8 Accretion and erosion maps of Oyan River (2002-2023)


4.3 Discussion

4.3.1 Land Use Land Cover

As obtained from the results of the research, it was observed that there is increase in volume of

the water body with time as illustrated in figures 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 above. Also, the vegetation

cover size increases with an increment in water body. Also, the land use land cover maps

indicates that the size of the barren lands are significantly reducing from year to year as 2023

recorded the least barren land mass.

4.3.2 River Channel Maps

The river channels of each year seemed familiar from 2002 to 2023, by displaying a relatively

similar pattern. The overlayed river channel map (Figure 4.7) exposes the insignificant diversity

recorded in the river channels of each year, having the channel in 2002 and 2023 almost

regularly flown, with a slight difference in the 2011 flow channel.

4.3.3 Accretion and Erosion Maps

The study revealed significant changes in the river channel morphology over the study period.

Figure 4.8 describes the accretion and erosion pattern of the river, and the followings were

recorded:

 2002-2011: The River exhibited noticeable changes in its course, with sections of the

river showing increased accretion. The width of the river in some parts expanded due to

erosion, while other areas experienced sediment deposition, leading to narrowing. Some

significant parts of the river channel remained unchanged.


 2011-2023: Further changes were observed with increased erosion in certain sections of

the river, leading to a wider channel.

 2002-2023: unlike 2002-2011 and 2011-2023, the changes exhibited were insignificant,

partially displaying mutual pattern with respect to erosion, accretion and the unchanged

area.
CHAPTER FIVE

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Conclusion

The study aimed to analyze the changes in the Oyan River channel over the years 2002, 2011,

and 2023 using remote sensing imagery and GIS tools. The primary objectives were to identify

and quantify the changes in river morphology, assess the impact of natural and anthropogenic

factors, and provide insights into the implications of these changes for river management. The

spatial analysis revealed significant changes in the Oyan River channel over the study periods.

The main findings include channel morphology and land cover changes.

The study also identified several key factors influencing the observed changes in the Oyan River

channel, which are; Natural processes and human activities.

The changes in the Oyan River channel have several important implications such as

environmental impacts, flood risk and river management. Loss of riparian vegetation and

increased erosion can lead to habitat degradation and reduced biodiversity. Alterations in the

river channel morphology can increase flood risks, affecting nearby communities and

infrastructure. Also, Effective management strategies are required to mitigate adverse impacts

and ensure sustainable use of river resources.

5.2 Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are proposed to address the

challenges and ensure the sustainable management of the Oyan River:


1. Erosion Control and Riverbank Stabilization: Establish vegetative buffer zones along

the riverbanks to reduce erosion and provide habitat for wildlife. Riparian reforestation

can stabilize banks and reduce sediment runoff. Implement engineering solutions such as

gabions, revetments, and retaining walls to protect vulnerable riverbank areas from

erosion.

2. Sustainable Land Use Practices: Promote sustainable agricultural practices that

minimize soil erosion and runoff. Techniques such as contour farming, terracing, and

cover cropping can help reduce the impact of farming activities on the river.

3. Flood Risk Management: Designate and enforce floodplain zones to restrict

development in high-risk areas. This approach can reduce the vulnerability of

communities and infrastructure to flooding.

4. Community Engagement and Education: Engage local communities in river

management efforts through education and participation in conservation activities.

Raising awareness about the importance of river ecosystems can foster community

support for sustainable practices.


REFERENCE

Gurnell, A. M. (2021). Vegetation–hydrogeomorphology interactions in river systems.

Geography Compass, 15(1), e12562.

Ofoezie, I. E., Asaolu, S. O. (1997). "Water level regulation and control of schistosomiasis

transmission: a case study in Oyan Reservoir, Ogun State, Nigeria". Bulletin of the World

Health Organization. 75 (5): 435–41. PMC 2487010. PMID 9447776

Hooke, J. M. (2022). River channel changes: Types, processes, causes, and implications. Earth

Surface Processes and Landforms, 47(3), 400-421.

Knighton, D. (2020). Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective. Routledge.

Pinter, N. (2021). Fluvial geomorphology: Monitoring river channel changes. Progress in

Physical Geography, 45(2), 237-261.

Wilcox, A. C. (2023). Climate change impacts on river channel dynamics. Journal of Hydrology,

615, 128456.

Booth, D. B. (2021). Urbanization and the geomorphology of streams. In Treatise on

Geomorphology (pp. 383-399). Academic Press.

Bravard, J. P., & Petts, G. E. (2023). River engineering and management: Past, present, and

future challenges. Water Resources Research, 59(1), e2021WR029968.

Kleinman, P. J., et al. (2020). Agriculture and water quality in the United States: Assessing

progress, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Environmental Quality, 49(5), 1175-

1190.

Poff, N. L., et al. (2022). Dams and rivers: A primer on the downstream effects of dams.

BioScience, 72(8), 730-744.


Aijazi, A. K., et al. (2021). Remote sensing and GIS-based approaches for river morphology

analysis: A review. Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1692.

Gallo, K. P., et al. (2017). Landsat legacy: The evolution of the Landsat program over 40 years.

Remote Sensing of Environment, 199, 135-153.

Higgins, C. J., et al. (2022). The role of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) in flood mapping and

monitoring: A review. Remote Sensing, 14(3), 543.

Kuenzer, C., et al. (2020). The potential of high-resolution optical satellite imagery for

monitoring small water bodies at a global scale. Remote Sensing, 12(15), 2363.

Lechner, A. M., et al. (2021). A review of remote sensing approaches for geomorphic change

detection. Geomorphology, 375, 107540.

Maidment, D. R. (2020). ArcGIS for environmental and water issues (2nd Ed.). Esri Press.

Passalacqua, P., et al. (2019). Advanced topographic analysis tools for terrestrial laser scanning.

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 44(1), 57-83).

Bilotta, G. S., et al. (2022). Remote sensing of sediment dynamics in river systems: Recent

advances and future directions. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and

Environment, 46(1), 3-29.

Cobby, D. M., et al. (2020). Remote sensing applications for riverine geomorphology and

hydraulics: A review. WIREs Water, 7(4), e1459.

Jiang, S., et al. (2021). Remote sensing applications in hydrological modeling: A review. Water,

13(17), 2364.

Sexton, J. O., et al. (2020). Global remote sensing for mapping and monitoring the spatial

distribution of vegetation: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Digital

Earth, 13(6), 630-652.


Yang, C., et al. (2021). Remote sensing applications for floodplain mapping and inundation

modeling: A review. Remote Sensing, 13(7), 1403.

Jensen, J. R. (2020). Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective (4th

Ed.). Pearson.

Kraak, M. J., & Ormeling, F. (2020). Cartography: Visualization of Geospatial Data (4th ed.).

CRC Press.

Longley, P. A., et al. (2021). Geographic Information Science and Systems (5th ed.). Wiley.

Malczewski, J. (2019). GIS-based Multicriteria Decision Analysis: A Survey of the Literature.

Springer.

Brouwer, R., et al. (2022). Stakeholder engagement in remote sensing and GIS for water

resources management: A review. Environmental Science & Policy, 127, 167-178.

Bunting, P., et al. (2021). Remote sensing of rivers: Perspectives, challenges, and future

directions. Remote Sensing, 13(22), 4718.

Cohen, W. B., & Goward, S. N. (2020). Remote sensing of rivers: Lessons learned and future

directions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 248, 111989.

Foody, G. M. (2021). Uncertainty in remote sensing and GIS. Progress in Physical Geography:

Earth and Environment, 45(2), 135-157.

Hassan, Q. K., et al. (2019). Automated analysis of river morphology using remote sensing data:

A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 148, 166-181.

Chen, L., et al. (2021). Remote sensing of river flow dynamics: Current status and future

directions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 253, 112197.

Jones, R., et al. (2019). LiDAR-based analysis of river channel morphology and floodplain

dynamics. Geomorphology, 327, 9-21.


Smith, J., et al. (2020). Satellite-based monitoring of river channel change: A review. Remote

Sensing, 12(10), 1575.

Wang, H., et al. (2022). Mapping land use change impacts on river channels using remote

sensing and GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 601, 126376.

Cohen, W. B., & Goward, S. N. (2020). Landsat's Role in Ecological Applications of Remote

Sensing. BioScience, 50(11), 1098-1108.

Roy, D. P., et al. (2014). Landsat-8: Science and product vision for terrestrial global change

research. Remote Sensing of Environment, 145, 154-172.

Zhu, Z., & Woodcock, C. E. (2012). Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat

imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 118, 83-94.

Campbell, J. B., & Wynne, R. H. (2021). Introduction to Remote Sensing (5th ed.). Guilford

Press.

Foody, G. M. (2020). Assessing the accuracy of land cover change with imperfect ground

reference data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 239, 111617.

Song, C., Woodcock, C. E., & Seto, K. C. (2021). Global urbanization and the contribution of

remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 253, 112200.

Zhu, Z., & Woodcock, C. E. (2012). Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat

imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 118, 83-94.

Zhu, Z., & Woodcock, C. E. (2012). Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat

imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 118, 83-94.

Song, C., Woodcock, C. E., & Seto, K. C. (2021). Global urbanization and the contribution of

remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 253, 112200.


Campbell, J. B., & Wynne, R. H. (2021). Introduction to Remote Sensing (5th Ed.). Guilford

Press.

Foody, G. M. (2020). Assessing the accuracy of land cover change with imperfect ground

reference data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 239, 111617.

Zhu, Z., & Woodcock, C. E. (2012). Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat

imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 118, 83-94.

Song, C., Woodcock, C. E., & Seto, K. C. (2021). Global urbanization and the contribution of

remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 253, 112200.

Campbell, J. B., & Wynne, R. H. (2021). Introduction to Remote Sensing (5th ed.). Guilford

Press.

Foody, G. M. (2020). Assessing the accuracy of land cover change with imperfect ground

reference data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 239, 111617.

Baker, V. R., et al. (2020). Floods and Floodplain Management in the Context of Global Climate

Change. Journal of Hydrology, 583, 124567.

Graf, W. L. (2020). Fluvial Processes in Dryland Rivers. Springer Nature.

Knighton, D. (2014). Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective. Routledge.

Trimble, S. W. (2015). Historical Agriculture and Soil Erosion in the Upper Mississippi Valley

Hill Country. CRC Press.

Baker, V. R., et al. (2020). Floods and Floodplain Management in the Context of Global Climate

Change. Journal of Hydrology, 583, 124567.

Graf, W. L. (2020). Fluvial Processes in Dryland Rivers. Springer Nature.

Knighton, D. (2014). Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective. Routledge.


Trimble, S. W. (2015). Historical Agriculture and Soil Erosion in the Upper Mississippi Valley

Hill Country. CRC Press.

Zhu, Z., & Woodcock, C. E. (2012). Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat

imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 118, 83-94.

Song, C., Woodcock, C. E., & Seto, K. C. (2021). Global urbanization and the contribution of

remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 253, 112200.

Leopold, L. B. and T. Maddock (1953). The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some

physiographic implications, US Government Printing Office.

Leopold, L. B. and T. Maddock Jr (1953). Relation of suspended-sediment concentration to

channel scour and fill. Proceedings of the fifth Hydraulics Conference.

Huq, A., et al. (1983). "Ecological relationships between Vibrio cholerae and planktonic

crustacean copepods." Applied and environmental microbiology 45(1): 275-283.

Akhtar, N., et al. (2021). "Various natural and anthropogenic factors responsible for water

quality degradation: A review." Water 13(19): 2660.

Arifjanov, A., et al. (2022). Modern technologies in the study of processes in channels. IOP

Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing.

Boothroyd, R. J., et al. (2021). "Applications of Google Earth Engine in fluvial geomorphology

for detecting river channel change." Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 8(1):

e21496.

Cavender-Bares, J., et al. (2022). "Integrating remote sensing with ecology and evolution to

advance biodiversity conservation." Nature Ecology & Evolution 6(5): 506-519.

Goodchild, M. F. (2000). "GIS and transportation: status and challenges." GeoInformatica 4:

127-139.
Huq, A., et al. (1983). "Ecological relationships between Vibrio cholerae and planktonic

crustacean copepods." Applied and environmental microbiology 45(1): 275-283.

Longley, P. A., et al. (2015). Geographic information science and systems, John Wiley & Sons.

Nilsson, C., et al. (2005). "Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems."

science 308(5720): 405-408.

Pathan, A. I. and P. Agnihotri (2021). "Application of new HEC-RAS version 5 for 1D

hydrodynamic flood modeling with special reference through geospatial techniques: a

case of River Purna at Navsari, Gujarat, India." Modeling Earth Systems and

Environment 7: 1133-1144

Petrick, N., et al. (2023). "Groundwater potential assessment of Penang Island, Malaysia,

through integration of Remote Sensing and GIS with validation by 2D ERT." Natural

Resources Research 32(2): 523-541.

Petts, G. E. (1984). "Sedimentation within a regulated river." Earth Surface Processes and

Landforms 9(2): 125-134.

Richards, K. (2024). Rivers: form and process in alluvial channels, Taylor & Francis.

Teleti, P. R. and A. J. Luis (2013). "Sea ice observations in polar regions: Evolution of

technologies in remote sensing."

Campbell, J. B., & Wynne, R. H. (2021). Introduction to Remote Sensing (5th ed.). Guilford

Press.

Foody, G. M. (2020). Assessing the accuracy of land cover change with imperfect ground

reference data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 239, 111617.

You might also like