Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Risk Analysis in Capital Budgeting
Risk Analysis in Capital Budgeting
in Capital Budgeting
Learning objective: To learn how to incorporate Risk evaluation while taking Capital Budgeting Decisions
Statistical Techniques
0.40 ₹ 600000
Year 1
₹ 600000
CA, CFA (USA), CPA (USA) PRAVEEN KHATOD - Best Faculty in India for SFM & SCMPE (COST) 200
RISK ANALYSIS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING
Similarly
Expected CF's of Yr 2 = ₹ 600000
Expected CF's of Yr 3 = ₹ 500000
σ= 10000000000
= 1,00,000
Q. A Project might end up with any of the 3 Scenarios
CA, CFA (USA), CPA (USA) PRAVEEN KHATOD - Best Faculty in India for SFM & SCMPE (COST)
RISK ANALYSIS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING
= 4846.65
Q. If two projects are under consideration. Decide which project should be accepted based on Risk & Return.
CA, CFA (USA), CPA (USA) PRAVEEN KHATOD - Best Faculty in India for SFM & SCMPE (COST)
RISK ANALYSIS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING
Solve :
(i) Proj A
Year 1 Year 2
Prob CF P x CF Prob CF P x CF
Project A
Alternatively,
2400 850
+ - 2500
1.10 1.10
1 2
Project B
NPV Prob. NPV x Prob.
CA, CFA (USA), CPA (USA) PRAVEEN KHATOD - Best Faculty in India for SFM & SCMPE (COST)
RISK ANALYSIS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING
Project A
Project B
σ = ₹ 9471
(iv)
Proj A Proj B
) )
Coefficient Risk 3173 9471
=
Coefficient of of Variation Return 385 1149
Variation defines how
much is the Risk per or = 8.2416 = 8.2428
) )
₹ 1 of Return. σ
Decision: Lower the NPV
criteria better
An Aggressive Company will take decision based solely on NPV irrespective of Risks involved. Accordingly, it
will Accept Proj B having Highest NPV
A Defensive Company will take decision based solely on Risk irrespective of Returns. Accordingly, it will
Accept Proj A having Least Risk .
A rational company should look at both i.e. Return as well as Risk & hence take decision based on coefficient of
Variation. Accordingly, it will select Proj A having lower CV.
CA, CFA (USA), CPA (USA) PRAVEEN KHATOD - Best Faculty in India for SFM & SCMPE (COST)
RISK ANALYSIS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING
Conventional Techniques
Risk Adjusted Discount Rate
Not all the Projects are equal in terms of Risk. Some Projects involve less risk & some are more risky. Hence
it would be wrong to discount every Project by firms KO.
It would be appropriate to discount high risk projects at a higher discount rate and vice-versa .
Total Return
Risk Higher the Risk, higher would be the
Expectations
Premium Risk Premium
from Project.
+
Rf
RADR i.e. Risk Adjust Discount Rate = Risk free rate + Risk Premium
Certainty Equivalent Approach or Alpha Approach (α)
0
CA, CFA (USA), CPA (USA) PRAVEEN KHATOD - Best Faculty in India for SFM & SCMPE (COST)
RISK ANALYSIS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING
Others Techniques
Sensitivity Analysis
Discounting Initial
Rate Investment
Life of An Adverse
the project change beyond a
No. of certain level in
Units even a single
Salvage
variable might
Value
NPV lead to NPV
falling below ‘0‘ &
make ita a loss
making project
Tax Rates
Selling Price
Fixed operating P.U.
Variable
Costs Cost
PU
Eg .
Initial Investment = ₹ 100000
Life = 4 Years
Annual CF's = ₹ 40000
Disc Rate = 10%
CA, CFA (USA), CPA (USA) PRAVEEN KHATOD - Best Faculty in India for SFM & SCMPE (COST)
RISK ANALYSIS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING
Solve:
PVI 126795
Less: Ini Inv 100000
NPV + 26795
Variety 1:
Assume Variable as ‘x’ & set NPV = 0
Solve:
Change
Sensitivity % = x 100
Base
(i) Sensitivity w.r.t. Initial Investment
CA, CFA (USA), CPA (USA) PRAVEEN KHATOD - Best Faculty in India for SFM & SCMPE (COST)
RISK ANALYSIS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING
PV of Inflows, at present, is ₹ 126795 and it can fall to ₹ 100000 before NPV turns negative
126795 - 100000
= x 100
126795
= 21.13%
1 40000
2 40000 ..........
3 40000 ..........
4 40000 .................
103550
PVI
Less : Ini Inv 100000
NPV + 3550 (5536)
Using interpolation :-
= 21.95%
CA, CFA (USA), CPA (USA) PRAVEEN KHATOD - Best Faculty in India for SFM & SCMPE (COST)
RISK ANALYSIS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING
21.95 % - 10%
Sensitivity % = x 100
10%
= 119.5%
(iv) Sensitivity % w.r.t life of the Project -
2 . . .
3 . . 99475
4 . 27320 126795
525
= 3 Years +
27320
= 3.0192 Years
4 - 3.0192
Sensitivity % = x 100
4
= 24.52%
Conclusion :
It can observed that our Project is Most sensitive to 'Annual CF's [Since only 21.13% change will lead to NPV
= 0] & Least sensitive to Disc. Rate
CA, CFA (USA), CPA (USA) PRAVEEN KHATOD - Best Faculty in India for SFM & SCMPE (COST)
RISK ANALYSIS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING
Q. Calculate % Change in NPV for 10% adverse change in each of the four variables.
Solve :
Pariculars Base (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
Case If initial If Annual If Disc. Rate If Life
investment Cf’s Changes Changes Changes
changes
Tip Use Cross Multiplication Technique i.e. for 10% Shock (i.e. adverse change) in a particular NPV
changes by - - . - - %, therefore, how much shock will be required for NPV to change by 100% [i.e.
NPV = 0]
?
100% x 10%
∴ 100% =
37.32%
= 26.795%
CA, CFA (USA), CPA (USA) PRAVEEN KHATOD - Best Faculty in India for SFM & SCMPE (COST)
RISK ANALYSIS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING
WN#1
Year Cf’s PVF PV
1 40000 0.909 .
2 40000 0.826 .
3 40000 0.751 .
0.6 Yr
40000 x
1 Yr
PVI 116503
Pv0 100000
NPV 16503
Year CF
1 ₹30000
2 ₹ 40000
3 ₹ 50000
4 ₹ 60000
Calc sensitivity to Annual CF's ?
Solve:
Cal of NPV
-n
1 30000 .
2 40000 .
3 50000 .
4 60000 .
PVI 138877
NPV 38877
CA, CFA (USA), CPA (USA) PRAVEEN KHATOD - Best Faculty in India for SFM & SCMPE (COST)
RISK ANALYSIS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING
Cal-n of Sensitivity %
Tip If Annual CF's are Not same across years then we can't assume Let the Annual CF's be x at which
NPV = 0’.
Simply calc What % fall is required in PV terms of Annual CF's so that NPV = 0 ?’
The % fall as calc above will also be applicable to Actual Annual CF's in the subsequent years.
138877 - 100000
= x 100
138877
= 27.99% 28%
CA, CFA (USA), CPA (USA) PRAVEEN KHATOD - Best Faculty in India for SFM & SCMPE (COST)
RISK ANALYSIS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING
Scenario Analyses
Sensitivity Analysis has a shortcoming that it assumes change in only One Variable at a time. However, in
practical life what if multiple variables starts changing, simultaneously ? The answer lies in ‘Scenario
Analysis’.
Under this method, we first develop a ‘Base case scenario’ & then go for Best Case Scenario as well as worst
case Scenario etc.
In addition to above, if it is possible to assign Probabilities for each scenario then ‘Expected NPV' may also
be calculated.
Cf’s are Uncorrelated ‘0’ Correlation. Cf’s are Perfectly Positively Correlated.
st
Be 5 Best
0. st
Be 0.5
W
or 0.5
0.5 st st Worst
W Be
or 0.5 0.5
Wo 0. st
rst
cas 5 Wo Prob of Worst Case Scenario = 0.50 Probability
e sc rst
ena
rio 0.5
CA, CFA (USA), CPA (USA) PRAVEEN KHATOD - Best Faculty in India for SFM & SCMPE (COST)