NOTICE

IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT CUM

ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE AT KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P. No. OF 2020

IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-

Panduga Sunitha and another

…Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas
…Respondent.

To,

Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 40 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ:

Business, Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o. Ramadugu
mandal of Karimnagar district.

Whereas the petitioner has filed a ____________________________

Cr. P.C. against you. Copy of the same is sent herewith.

Take notice that the said petition is posted to__________2020 for

your counter and enquiry. In case of default the petition will be heard and
determined in your absence.

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this the ________
day of 2020
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT
AT KARIMNAGAR
Cr.M.P. No. OF 2020
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-
1. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 35 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o.
H. No. 1-3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

2. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 16 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and
next friend i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]
…Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 40 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ:
Business, Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o.
Ramadugu mandal of Karimnagar district.
…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR

ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF MAINTENANCE

May it please your Honour,

The above named petitioners humbly submit as under.

1]. That the above named petitioners have filed the F.C.M.C.No. 66 of
2008 for granting maintenance Under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. against the
above said respondent before the Hon’ble Family Court, Karimnagar. After
conducting trial and enquiry the Hon’ble Family Court was partly allowed
and pleased to pass order in the above case, on 30-12-2008. The Family
Hon’ble Court passed order in favour of petitioners against the respondent
directing him to pay Rs. 1200/- per month for the 1 st respondent and Rs.
800/- per month for the 2nd respondent towards maintenance from the date of
filing of the petition i.e., from 05-09-2008. As per orders passed by the
Hon’ble Court the respondent has to deposit an amount of Rs. 2000/- per
month to the petitioners.

2]. The petitioners have filed a petition u/sec 127 of Cr. P.C to enhance
maintenance from Rs. 1,200/- to Rs. 3,000/- to the petitioner no. 1 and Rs.
800/- to Rs. 2,000/- to the petitioner no. 2 per month vide Crl.M.P. No. 148
of 2016. Accordingly on 24-06-2020 the Hon’ble Court has allowed the
petition by enhancing the amount from Rs. 2,000/- to Rs. 5,000/- per month
to the petitioners i.e., Rs. 2,500/- each and directed the respondent to pay the
said maintenance amount to the petitioners no. 1 & 2 from the date of the
petition i.e., [10-04-2016] and he shall pay the maintenance amount to the
petitioners on or before 10th of every month. The respondent is further
directed to pay the arrears of difference amount of maintenance which is
enhanced to the petitioners within two months. Accordingly the respondent
is liable to pay arrears @ Rs. 3,000/- per month from 10-04-2016 to 10-04-
2019 is Rs. 1,08,000/- [3 years] to the petitioners.

3]. The petitioner no.1 submit that she is an house-hold lady and she is
living by borrowing amounts from others and mercy of her parents and the
petitioner no. 2 is minor and they will wait more time for getting the
amounts as they are leading miserable life. The petitioners are unable to
maintain themselves and they need minimum basic needs like food, clothes,
education and medical aid etc., immediately as such the amount is very
much required to them. According to the calculation the respondent has to
pay Rs. 1,08,000/- to the petitioners. It is just and necessary to direct the
respondent to pay the said amount to the petitioners immediately.

P R A Y E R:-
Hence in the interest of justice this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to
pass an order for directing the respondent to pay an amount of Rs. 1,08,000/-
to the petitioners or in case of failure by the respondent this Hon’ble Court
may be pleased to send the respondent to jail.

For which act of justice, the petitioners shall ever pray.

Date: 11-2020 Petitioners

VERIFICATION:-
I, the above named petitioner hereby declare that what is stated in the
above petition is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Hence verified on this the November, 2020 at Karimnagar.

Through: Petitioners

T. VENUGOPAL,
Counsel for the Petitioners.
 IN THE COURT OF THE
HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY
COURT AT KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2020
IN

F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha & another

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas
…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER

SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR
ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF
MAINTENANCE

Filed on: -11-2020

Filed by:

T. VENUGOPAL,
Advocate for the petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT
AT KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2020
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-

1. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 35 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o.

H.No. 1-3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

2. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 16 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and next
friend i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]
…Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 40 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ:
Business, Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o. Ramadugu
mandal of Karimnagar district.

…Respondent.

CALCULATION MEMO

Maintenance Amount of @ 2500/- per Rs. 3,000 X 36 months

month to the 1st petitioner and Rs.2500/- Rs. 1,08,000/-
per month to the 2nd petitioner towards
monthly maintenance as per orders
dated 24-06-2020 from 10-04-2016 to
10-04-2019 @ Rs. 3,000/- per month
[36 months]

Grand Total Rs. 1,08,000=00

Date: - 11-2020 T. VENUGOPAL,

Counsel for the Petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT
AT KARIMNAGAR
Cr.M.P. No. OF 2020
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-
3. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 35 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o.
H.No. 1-3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

4. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 16 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and
next friend i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]
…Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 40 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ:
Business, Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o.
Ramadugu mandal of Karimnagar district.
…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR

ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF MAINTENANCE

May it please your Honour,

The above named petitioners humbly submit as under.

1]. That the above named petitioners have filed the F.C.M.C.No. 66 of
2008 for granting maintenance Under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. against the
above said respondent before the Hon’ble Family Court, Karimnagar. After
conducting trial and enquiry the Hon’ble Family Court was partly allowed
and pleased to pass order in the above case, on 30-12-2008. The Family
Hon’ble Court passed order in favour of petitioners against the respondent
directing him to pay Rs. 1200/- per month for the 1 st respondent and Rs.
800/- per month for the 2nd respondent towards maintenance from the date of
filing of the petition i.e., from 05-09-2008.

2]. As per orders passed by the Hon’ble Court the respondent has to
deposit an amount of Rs. 2000/- per month to the petitioners, but the
respondent filed appeal before the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hyderabad and the same was disposed confirming to pay an amount of Rs.
2,000/- per month. Accordingly the respondent is liable to pay Rs. 14,000/-
from 05-10-2018 to 04-05-2019 to the petitioners.
Contd…P/2..,
 ::2::

3]. The petitioners submit that she is an house-hold lady and she is living
by borrowing amounts from others and mercy of her parents and the
petitioner no. 2 is minor and they will wait more time for getting the
amounts as they are leading miserable life. The petitioners are unable to
maintain themselves and they need minimum basic needs like food, clothes,
education and medical aid etc., immediately as such the amount is very
much required to them. According to the calculation the respondent has to
pay Rs. 16,000/-. It is just and necessary to direct the respondent to pay the
said amount to the petitioners immediately.

P R A Y E R:-
Hence in the interest of justice this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to
pass an order for directing the respondent to pay an amount of Rs. 16,000/-
to the petitioners or in case of failure by the respondent this Hon’ble Court
may be pleased to send the respondent to jail.

For which act of justice, the petitioners shall ever pray.

Date: 01-2020 Petitioners

VERIFICATION:-
I, the above named petitioner hereby declare that what is stated in the
above petition is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Hence verified on this the January, 2020 at Karimnagar.

Through: Petitioners

T. VENUGOPAL,
Counsel for the Petitioners.
 IN THE COURT OF THE
HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY
COURT AT KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2020
IN

F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha & another

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas
…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER

SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR
ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF
MAINTENANCE

Filed on: -01-2020

Filed by:

T. VENUGOPAL,
Advocate for the petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT
AT KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2020
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-

3. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 35 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o.

H.No. 1-3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

4. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 16 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and next
friend i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]
…Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 40 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ:
Business, Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o. Ramadugu
mandal of Karimnagar district.

…Respondent.

CALCULATION MEMO

Maintenance Amount of @ 1200/- per Rs. 9,600=00 petitioner No. 1

month to the 1st petitioner and Rs. 800/- Rs. 6,400=00 petitioner No. 2
per month to the 2nd petitioner towards
monthly maintenance as per orders
dated 05-03-2010. From 05-05-2019 to
05-01-2020 [8 months] passed in F.C.
M.C. No. 66/08]

Grand Total Rs. 16,000=00

Date: -01-2020 T. VENUGOPAL,

Counsel for the Petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT
AT KARIMNAGAR
Cr.M.P. No. OF 2019
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-
5. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o.
H.No. 1-3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

6. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 4 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and
next friend i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]
…Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 29 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ:
Business, Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o.
Ramadugu mandal of Karimnagar district.
…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR

ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF MAINTENANCE

May it please your Honour,

The above named petitioners humbly submit as under.

1]. That the above named petitioners have filed the F.C.M.C.No. 66 of
2008 for granting maintenance Under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. against the
above said respondent before the Hon’ble Family Court, Karimnagar. After
conducting trial and enquiry the Hon’ble Family Court was partly allowed
and pleased to pass order in the above case, on 30-12-2008. The Family
Hon’ble Court passed order in favour of petitioners against the respondent
directing him to pay Rs. 1200/- per month for the 1 st respondent and Rs.
800/- per month for the 2nd respondent towards maintenance from the date of
filing of the petition i.e., from 05-09-2008.

2]. As per orders passed by the Hon’ble Court the respondent has to
deposit an amount of Rs. 2000/- per month to the petitioners, but the
respondent filed appeal before the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hyderabad and the same was disposed confirming to pay an amount of Rs.
2,000/- per month. Accordingly the respondent is liable to pay Rs. 14,000/-
from 05-10-2018 to 04-05-2019 to the petitioners.
Contd…P/2..,
 ::2::

3]. The petitioners submit that she is an house-hold lady and she is living
by borrowing amounts from others and mercy of her parents and the
petitioner no. 2 is minor and they will wait more time for getting the
amounts as they are leading miserable life. The petitioners are unable to
maintain themselves and they need minimum basic needs like food, clothes,
education and medical aid etc., immediately as such the amount is very
much required to them. According to the calculation the respondent has to
pay Rs. 14,000/-. It is just and necessary to direct the respondent to pay the
said amount to the petitioners immediately.

P R A Y E R:-
Hence in the interest of justice this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to
pass an order for directing the respondent to pay an amount of Rs. 14,000/-
to the petitioners or in case of failure by the respondent this Hon’ble Court
may be pleased to send the respondent to jail.

For which act of justice, the petitioners shall ever pray.

Date: 05-2019 Petitioners

VERIFICATION:-
I, the above named petitioner hereby declare that what is stated in the
above petition is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Hence verified on this the May, 2019 at Karimnagar.

Through: Petitioners

T. VENUGOPAL,
Counsel for the Petitioners.
 IN THE COURT OF THE
HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY
COURT AT KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2019
IN

F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha & another

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas
…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER

SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR
ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF
MAINTENANCE

Filed on: -05-2019

Filed by:

T. VENUGOPAL,
Advocate for the petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT
AT KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2019
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-

5. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o.

H.No. 1-3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

6. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 4 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and next
friend i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]
…Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 29 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ:
Business, Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o. Ramadugu
mandal of Karimnagar district.

…Respondent.

CALCULATION MEMO

Maintenance Amount of @ 1200/- per Rs. 12,000=00 petitioner No. 1

month to the 1st petitioner and Rs. 800/- Rs. 8,000=00 petitioner No. 2
nd
per month to the 2 petitioner towards
monthly maintenance as per orders
dated 05-03-2010. From 05-10-2018 to
04-05-2019 [7 months] passed in F.C.
M.C. No. 66/08]

Grand Total Rs. 14,000=00

Date: -05-2019 T. VENUGOPAL,

Counsel for the Petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT
AT KARIMNAGAR
Cr.M.P. No. OF 2018
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-
7. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o.
H.No. 1-3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

8. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 4 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and
next friend i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]
…Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 29 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ:
Business, Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o.
Ramadugu mandal of Karimnagar district.
…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR

ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF MAINTENANCE

May it please your Honour,

The above named petitioners humbly submit as under.

1]. That the above named petitioners have filed the F.C.M.C.No. 66 of
2008 for granting maintenance Under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. against the
above said respondent before the Hon’ble Family Court, Karimnagar. After
conducting trial and enquiry the Hon’ble Family Court was partly allowed
and pleased to pass order in the above case, on 30-12-2008. The Family
Hon’ble Court passed order in favour of petitioners against the respondent
directing him to pay Rs. 1200/- per month for the 1 st respondent and Rs.
800/- per month for the 2nd respondent towards maintenance from the date of
filing of the petition i.e., from 05-09-2008.

2]. As per orders passed by the Hon’ble Court the respondent has to
deposit an amount of Rs. 2000/- per month to the petitioners, but the
respondent filed appeal before the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hyderabad and the same was disposed confirming to pay an amount of Rs.
2,000/- per month. Accordingly the respondent is liable to pay Rs. 20,000/-
from 05-01-2018 to 04-10-2018 to the petitioners.
Contd…P/2..,
 ::2::

3]. The petitioners submit that she is an house-hold lady and she is living
by borrowing amounts from others and mercy of her parents and the
petitioner no. 2 is minor and they will wait more time for getting the
amounts as they are leading miserable life. The petitioners are unable to
maintain themselves and they need minimum basic needs like food, clothes,
education and medical aid etc., immediately as such the amount is very
much required to them. According to the calculation the respondent has to
pay Rs. 20,000/-. It is just and necessary to direct the respondent to pay the
said amount to the petitioners immediately.

P R A Y E R:-
Hence in the interest of justice this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to
pass an order for directing the respondent to pay an amount of Rs. 20,000/-
to the petitioners or in case of failure by the respondent this Hon’ble Court
may be pleased to send the respondent to jail.

For which act of justice, the petitioners shall ever pray.

Date: Petitioners

VERIFICATION:-
I, the above named petitioner hereby declare that what is stated in the
above petition is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Hence verified on this the , 2018 at Karimnagar.

Through: Petitioners

T. VENUGOPAL,
Counsel for the Petitioners.
 IN THE COURT OF THE
HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY
COURT AT KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2018
IN

F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha & another

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas
…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER

SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR
ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF
MAINTENANCE

Filed on:

Filed by:

T. VENUGOPAL,
Advocate for the petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT
AT KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2018
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-

7. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o.

H.No. 1-3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

8. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 4 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and next
friend i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]
…Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 29 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ:
Business, Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o. Ramadugu
mandal of Karimnagar district.

…Respondent.

CALCULATION MEMO

Maintenance Amount of @ 1200/- per Rs. 12,000=00 petitioner No. 1

month to the 1st petitioner and Rs. 800/- Rs. 8,000=00 petitioner No. 2
nd
per month to the 2 petitioner towards
monthly maintenance as per orders
dated 05-03-2010. From 05-01-2018 to
04-10-2018 [12 months] passed in F.C.
M.C. No. 66/08]

Grand Total Rs. 20,000=00

Date: -11-2018 T. VENUGOPAL,

Counsel for the Petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT
AT KARIMNAGAR
Cr.M.P. No. OF 2018
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-
9. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o.
H.No. 1-3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

10.Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 4 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and
next friend i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]
…Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 29 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ:
Business, Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o.
Ramadugu mandal of Karimnagar district.
…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR

ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF MAINTENANCE

May it please your Honour,

The above named petitioners humbly submit as under.

1]. That the above named petitioners have filed the F.C.M.C.No. 66 of
2008 for granting maintenance Under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. against the
above said respondent before the Hon’ble Family Court, Karimnagar. After
conducting trial and enquiry the Hon’ble Family Court was partly allowed
and pleased to pass order in the above case, on 30-12-2008. The Family
Hon’ble Court passed order in favour of petitioners against the respondent
directing him to pay Rs. 1200/- per month for the 1 st respondent and Rs.
800/- per month for the 2nd respondent towards maintenance from the date of
filing of the petition i.e., from 05-09-2008.

2]. As per orders passed by the Hon’ble Court the respondent has to
deposit an amount of Rs. 2000/- per month to the petitioners, but the
respondent filed appeal before the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hyderabad and the same was disposed confirming to pay an amount of Rs.
2,000/- per month. Accordingly the respondent is liable to pay Rs. 24,000/-
from 05-01-2017 to 04-01-2018 to the petitioners.
Contd…P/2..,
 ::2::

3]. The petitioners submit that she is an house-hold lady and she is living
by borrowing amounts from others and mercy of her parents and the
petitioner no. 2 is minor and they will wait more time for getting the
amounts as they are leading miserable life. The petitioners are unable to
maintain themselves and they need minimum basic needs like food, clothes,
education and medical aid etc., immediately as such the amount is very
much required to them. According to the calculation the respondent has to
pay Rs. 24,000/-. It is just and necessary to direct the respondent to pay the
said amount to the petitioners immediately.

P R A Y E R:-
Hence in the interest of justice this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to
pass an order for directing the respondent to pay an amount of Rs. 24,000/-
to the petitioners or in case of failure by the respondent this Hon’ble Court
may be pleased to send the respondent to jail.

For which act of justice, the petitioners shall ever pray.

Date: Petitioners

VERIFICATION:-
I, the above named petitioner hereby declare that what is stated in the
above petition is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Hence verified on this the , 2018 at Karimnagar.

Through: Petitioners

T. VENUGOPAL,
Counsel for the Petitioners.
 IN THE COURT OF THE
HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY
COURT AT KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2018
IN

F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha & another

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas
…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER

SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR
ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF
MAINTENANCE

Filed on:

Filed by:

T. VENUGOPAL,
Advocate for the petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT
AT KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2018
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-

9. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o.

H.No. 1-3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

10. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 4 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and next
friend i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]
…Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 29 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ:
Business, Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o. Ramadugu
mandal of Karimnagar district.

…Respondent.

CALCULATION MEMO

Maintenance Amount of @ 1200/- per Rs. 14,400=00 petitioner No. 1

month to the 1st petitioner and Rs. 800/- Rs. 9,600=00 petitioner No. 2
nd
per month to the 2 petitioner towards
monthly maintenance as per orders
dated 05-03-2010. From 05-01-2017 to
04-01-2018 [12 months] passed in F.C.
M.C. No. 66/08]

Grand Total Rs. 24,000=00

Date: -01-2018 T. VENUGOPAL,

Counsel for the Petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT
AT KARIMNAGAR
Cr.M.P. No. OF 2017
IN
F.C. M.C. No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-
1]. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold,
2]. Panduga Vamshi Ram, S/o. Srinivas, age 13 years, occ: student
Both R/o. H. No. 1-3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and
district.
…Petitioners/Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 29 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ: Business,
Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o. Ramadugu mandal of
Karimnagar district.
…Respondent/Respondent.

PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 254 [2] OF Cr.P.C

May it Please Your Honour,

The Petitioners/petitioners submits as under:-
1]. That in the above mentioned case, the petitioner/petitioner is filing
some documents i.e., 1]. Application to Gram Panchayat, Deshrajpally v/o.
Ramadugu mandal and 2]. Original Photograph of S.V.S Egg and Chicken
Center belongs to respondent and which are necessary for the just decision of
the case. The same may be received and marked as exhibits on behalf of
petitioner/petitioner.
2]. That no prejudice is caused to the respondent/respondent if the
documents are received and marked as exhibits on behalf of the
petitioner/petitioner.
3]. That this Hon’ble court has got wide powers to receive the documents
and mark the same as exhibits.
P R A Y E R:
It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to
receive the above said documents and the same may be marked as exhibits on
behalf of the petitioner/petitioner, in the interest of justice.
For which act of justice the petitioner/petitioner shall ever pray.

Date: 04-08-2017. PETITIONER

Through

T. VENUGOPAL,
Advocate
 IN THE COURT OF THE
HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY
COURT AT KARIMNAGAR

Cr. M.P No. 2017

in
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha & another

…Petitioners/Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas
…Respondent/Respondent.

PETITION FILED UNDER

SECTION 254 [2] OF Cr.P.C

Filed on: -08-2017

Filed by:

T. VENUGOPAL,
Advocate for the petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT
AT KARIMNAGAR

F.C. M.C. No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha and another

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas

…Respondent.

CHIEF EXAMINATION OF PW-2 ON AFFIDAVIT

I, ***, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o. H. No. 1-

3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district, do hereby
solemnly affirm and state on oath as under:

1]. I am the petitioner no. 1 herein and as such I know the facts of the
case. I am deposing this affidavit on behalf of petitioner no. 2 and I am
authorized by him.

2]. I have filed the F.C. M.C. No. 66 of 2008 for granting maintenance
Under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. against the above said respondent before this
court. After conducting trial and enquiry this Hon’ble Court was partly
allowed and pleased to pass order in the above case, on 30-12-2008 in our
favour against the respondent directing him to pay Rs. 1200/- per month for
the 1st respondent and Rs. 800/- per month for the 2 nd respondent towards
maintenance from the date of filing of the petition i.e., from 05-09-2008. I
submit that as per orders passed by the Hon’ble Court the respondent has to
deposit an amount of Rs. 2000/- per month to us, but the respondent filed
appeal before the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and
later the same was disposed confirming to pay an amount of Rs. 2,000/- per
month. I submit that I am a house-hold lady and I am living by borrowing
amounts from others and mercy of my parents and the petitioner no. 2 is
minor and he is studying in a private school as such we are leading
miserable life. I am unable to maintain ourselves and we need minimum
basic needs like food, clothes, education and medical aid etc., with the
meager amount of Rs. 2,000/-. The petitioner no. 2 is studying and cost of
living is increased enormously as such the maintenance amount granted was
very meager and it is not sufficient to us to fulfill our basic needs. Hence it
is just and necessary to enhance monthly maintenance amount from Rs.
2,000/- to Rs. 5,000/- from the date of the petition.

Date: -07-2017. DEPONENT

Solemnly affirmed and signed before me on this the day of July,

2017 at Karimnagar.

Identified by: Attested by:

T. VENUGOPAL
Counsel for the petitioner
 IN THE COURT OF THE
HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY
COURT AT KARIMNAGAR

F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha & another

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas
…Respondent.

CHIEF EXAMINATION OF PW-2

ON AFFIDAVIT

Filed on: -07-2017

Filed by:

T. VENUGOPAL,
Advocate for the petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT
AT KARIMNAGAR
Cr.M.P. No. OF 2017
IN
F.C. M.C. No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-
1]. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold,
2]. Panduga Vamshi Ram, S/o. Srinivas, age 13 years, occ: student
Both R/o. H. No. 1-3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and
district.
…Petitioners/Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 29 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ: Business,
Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o. Ramadugu mandal of
Karimnagar district.
…Respondent/Respondent.

PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 254 [2] OF Cr.P.C

May it Please Your Honour,

The Petitioners/petitioners submits as under:-
1]. That in the above mentioned case, the petitioner/petitioner is filing
some documents i.e., 1]. Original School fee receipt, dt 13-10-2016, 2].
Orginal School fee receipt, dt 13-12-2016 and 3]. Original Fee Structure
issued by Gouthami High School for the year 2016 & 2017 for the just
decision of the case. The same may be received and marked as exhibits on
behalf of petitioner/petitioner.
2]. That no prejudice is caused to the respondent/respondent if the
documents are received and marked as exhibits on behalf of the
petitioner/petitioner.
3]. That this Hon’ble court has got wide powers to receive the documents
and mark the same as exhibits.
P R A Y E R:
It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to
receive the above said documents and the same may be marked as exhibits on
behalf of the petitioner/petitioner, in the interest of justice.
For which act of justice the petitioner/petitioner shall ever pray.

Date: -06-2017. DEPONENT

Solemnly affirmed and signed before me on this the th day of June,
2017 at Karimnagar.

Identified by: Attested by:

T. VENUGOPAL, Advocate,
Advocate Karimnagar
 IN THE COURT OF THE
HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY
COURT AT KARIMNAGAR

Cr. M.P No. 2017

in
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha & another

…Petitioners/Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas
…Respondent/Respondent.

PETITION FILED UNDER

SECTION 254 [2] OF Cr.P.C

Filed on: -06-2017

Filed by:

T. VENUGOPAL,
Advocate for the petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT
AT KARIMNAGAR

F.C. M.C. No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha and another

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas

…Respondent.

CHIEF EXAMINATION OF PETITIONER NO. 1 AS PW-1 ON

AFFIDAVIT

I, Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold,

R/o. H. No. 1-3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district, do
hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as under:

1]. I am the petitioner no. 1 herein and as such I know the facts of the
case. I am deposing this affidavit on behalf of petitioner no. 2 and I am
authorized by him.

2]. I have filed the F.C. M.C. No. 66 of 2008 for granting maintenance
Under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. against the above said respondent before this
court. After conducting trial and enquiry this Hon’ble Court was partly
allowed and pleased to pass order in the above case, on 30-12-2008 in our
favour against the respondent directing him to pay Rs. 1200/- per month for
the 1st respondent and Rs. 800/- per month for the 2 nd respondent towards
maintenance from the date of filing of the petition i.e., from 05-09-2008. I
submit that as per orders passed by the Hon’ble Court the respondent has to
deposit an amount of Rs. 2000/- per month to us, but the respondent filed
appeal before the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and
later the same was disposed confirming to pay an amount of Rs. 2,000/- per
month. I submit that I am a house-hold lady and I am living by borrowing
amounts from others and mercy of my parents and the petitioner no. 2 is
minor and he is studying in a private school as such we are leading
miserable life. I am unable to maintain ourselves and we need minimum
basic needs like food, clothes, education and medical aid etc., with the
meager amount of Rs. 2,000/-. The petitioner no. 2 is studying and cost of
living is increased enormously as such the maintenance amount granted was
very meager and it is not sufficient to us to fulfill our basic needs. Hence it
is just and necessary to enhance monthly maintenance amount from Rs.
2,000/- to Rs. 5,000/- from the date of the petition.

P R A Y E R:-

Hence in the interest of justice this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to

pass an order directing the respondent to enhancement of maintenance

amount from Rs. 2,000/- to Rs. 6,000/- to us from the date of the petition, in

interest of justice.

For which act of justice, we shall ever pray.

Date: 13-05-2017. DEPONENT

Solemnly affirmed and signed before me on this the 13 th day of May,

2017 at Karimnagar.

Identified by: Attested by:

 IN THE COURT OF THE
HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY
COURT AT KARIMNAGAR

F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha & another

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas
…Respondent.

CHIEF EXAMINATION OF
PETITIONER NO. 1 AS PW-1 ON
AFFIDAVIT

Filed on: -05-2017

Filed by:

T. VENUGOPAL,
Advocate for the petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT AT
KARIMNAGAR
Cr.M.P.No. OF 2017
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-

11. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o. H.No. 1-3-
120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

12. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 4 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and next friend
i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 29 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ: Business,
Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o. Ramadugu mandal of
Karimnagar district.

…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR

ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF MAINTENANCE

May it please your Honour,

The above named petitioners humbly submit as under.

1]. That the above named petitioners have filed the F.C.M.C.No. 66 of 2008 for

granting maintenance Under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. against the above said respondent

before the Hon’ble Family Court, Karimnagar. After conducting trial and enquiry the

Hon’ble Family Court was partly allowed and pleased to pass order in the above case, on

30-12-2008. The Family Hon’ble Court passed order in favour of petitioners against the

respondent directing him to pay Rs. 1200/- per month for the 1 st respondent and Rs. 800/-

per month for the 2nd respondent towards maintenance from the date of filing of the

petition i.e., from 05-09-2008.

2]. As per orders passed by the Hon’ble Court the respondent has to deposit an

amount of Rs. 2000/- per month to the petitioners, but the respondent filed appeal before

the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and the same was disposed

confirming to pay an amount of Rs. 2,000/- per month. Accordingly the respondent is

liable to pay Rs. 8,000/- from 05-11-2016 to 05-02-2017 to the petitioners.

Contd…P/2..,
 ::2::

3]. The petitioners submit that she is an house-hold lady and she is living by

borrowing amounts from others and mercy of her parents and the petitioner no. 2 is

minor and they will wait more time for getting the amounts as they are leading miserable

life. The petitioners are unable to maintain themselves and they need minimum basic

needs like food, clothes, education and medical aid etc., immediately as such the amount

is very much required to them. According to the calculation the respondent has to pay

Rs. 8,000/-. It is just and necessary to direct the respondent to pay the said amount to the

petitioners immediately.

P R A Y E R:-
Hence in the interest of justice this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass an order

for directing the respondent to pay an amount of Rs. 8,000/- to the petitioners or in case

of failure by the respondent this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to send the respondent to

jail.

For which act of justice, the petitioners shall ever pray.

Date: Petitioner

VERIFICATION:-
I, the above named petitioner hereby declare that what is stated in the above
petition is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Hence verified on this
the , 2016 at Karimnagar.

Through: Petitioner

T. VENUGOPAL,
Counsel for the Petitioners.
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE
JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT AT
KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2017
IN

F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha & another

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas
…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER

SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR
ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF
MAINTENANCE

Filed on:

Filed by:

T. VENUGOPAL,
Advocate for the petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT AT
KARIMNAGAR
Cr.M.P.No. OF 2016
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-

13. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o. H.No. 1-3-
120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

14. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 4 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and next friend
i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 29 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ: Business,
Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o. Ramadugu mandal of
Karimnagar district.

…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR

ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF MAINTENANCE

May it please your Honour,

The above named petitioners humbly submit as under.

1]. That the above named petitioners have filed the F.C.M.C.No. 66 of 2008 for

granting maintenance Under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. against the above said respondent

before the Hon’ble Family Court, Karimnagar. After conducting trial and enquiry the

Hon’ble Family Court was partly allowed and pleased to pass order in the above case, on

30-12-2008. The Family Hon’ble Court passed order in favour of petitioners against the

respondent directing him to pay Rs. 1200/- per month for the 1 st respondent and Rs. 800/-

per month for the 2nd respondent towards maintenance from the date of filing of the

petition i.e., from 05-09-2008.

2]. As per orders passed by the Hon’ble Court the respondent has to deposit an

amount of Rs. 2000/- per month to the petitioners, but the respondent filed appeal before

the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and the same was disposed

confirming to pay an amount of Rs. 2,000/- per month. Accordingly the respondent is

liable to pay Rs. 18,000/- from 05-02-2016 to 05-11-2016 to the petitioners.

Contd…P/2..,
 ::2::

3]. The petitioners submit that she is an house-hold lady and she is living by

borrowing amounts from others and mercy of her parents and the petitioner no. 2 is

minor and they will wait more time for getting the amounts as they are leading miserable

life. The petitioners are unable to maintain themselves and they need minimum basic

needs like food, clothes, education and medical aid etc., immediately as such the amount

is very much required to them. According to the calculation the respondent has to pay

Rs. 18,000/-. It is just and necessary to direct the respondent to pay the said amount to

the petitioners immediately.

P R A Y E R:-
Hence in the interest of justice this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass an order

for directing the respondent to pay an amount of Rs. 18,000/- to the petitioners or in case

of failure by the respondent this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to send the respondent to

jail.

For which act of justice, the petitioners shall ever pray.

Date: Petitioner

VERIFICATION:-
I, the above named petitioner hereby declare that what is stated in the above
petition is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Hence verified on this
the , 2016 at Karimnagar.

Through: Petitioner

T. VENUGOPAL,
Counsel for the Petitioners.
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE
JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT AT
KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2016
IN

F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha & another

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas
…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER

SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR
ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF
MAINTENANCE

Filed on:

Filed by:

T. VENUGOPAL,
Advocate for the petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT AT
KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2016
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-

11. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o. H.No. 1-3-
120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

12. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 4 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and next friend
i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]
…Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 29 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ: Business,
Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o. Ramadugu mandal of
Karimnagar district.

…Respondent.

CALCULATION MEMO

Maintenance Amount of @ 1200/- per Rs. 10,800=00 petitioner No. 1

month to the 1st petitioner and Rs. 800/- per Rs. 7,200=00 petitioner No. 2
month to the 2nd petitioner towards monthly
maintenance as per orders dated 05-03-
2010. From 05-02-2016 to 05-11-2016 [9
months] passed in F.C. M.C. No. 66/08]

Grand Total Rs. 18,000=00

Date: -11-2016 T. VENUGOPAL,

Counsel for the Petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT AT
KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2016
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-

1]. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o.
H.No. 1-3-120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

2]. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 4 years, minor [Petitioner
No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and next friend i.e.,
petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 29 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ:

Business, Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o. Ramadugu
mandal of Karimnagar district.

…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 127 OF Cr.P.C. FOR

ENHANCEMENT OF ORDER OF MAINTENANCE

May it please your Honour,

The above named petitioners humbly submit as under.

1]. That the above named petitioners have filed the F.C.M.C.No. 66 of
2008 for granting maintenance Under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. against the
above said respondent before the Hon’ble Family Court, Karimnagar. After
conducting trial and enquiry the Hon’ble Family Court was partly allowed
and pleased to pass order in the above case, on 30-12-2008. The Family
Hon’ble Court passed order in favour of petitioners against the respondent
directing him to pay Rs. 1200/- per month for the 1 st respondent and Rs.
800/- per month for the 2nd respondent towards maintenance from the date of
filing of the petition i.e., from 05-09-2008.

2]. As per orders passed by the Hon’ble Court the respondent has to
deposit an amount of Rs. 2000/- per month to the petitioners, but the
respondent filed appeal before the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hyderabad and as per the orders of High Court of AP the respondent is
directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,000/- per month. Accordingly the
respondent is paying the amount at the rate of Rs. 1,000/- per month and
recently the Hon’ble High Court at Hyderabad dismissed the petition filed
by the respondent as such he has to pay Rs. 2,000/- per month.

3]. The petitioners submit that she is an house-hold lady and she is living
by borrowing amounts from others and mercy of her parents and the
petitioner no. 2 is minor and they will wait more time for getting the
amounts as they are leading miserable life. The petitioners are unable to
maintain themselves and they need minimum basic needs like food, clothes,
education and medical aid etc., immediately as such the amount is very
much required to them. The petitioner no. 2 is studying and cost of living is
increased enormously as such the maintenance amount granted was very
meager and it is not sufficient to the petitioners to fulfill their basic needs.
Hence it is just and necessary to enhance monthly maintenance amount from
Rs. 2,000/- to Rs. 5,000/- from the date of this petition.

P R A Y E R:-
Hence in the interest of justice this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to
pass an order directing the respondent to enhancement of maintenance
amount from Rs. 2,000/- to Rs. 5,000/- to the petitioners from the date of
this petition, in interest of justice.

For which act of justice, the petitioners shall ever pray.

Date: Petitioner
VERIFICATION:-
I, the above named petitioner hereby declare that what is stated in the
above petition is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Hence verified on this the , 2016 at Karimnagar.

Through: Petitioner

T. VENUGOPAL,
Counsel for the Petitioners.
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE
JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT AT
KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2016
IN

F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha & another

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas
…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER

SECTION 127 OF Cr.P.C. FOR
ENHANCEMENT OF ORDER OF
MAINTENANCE

Filed on:

Filed by:

T. VENUGOPAL,
Advocate for the petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT AT
KARIMNAGAR
Cr.M.P.No. OF 2016
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-

15. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o. H.No. 1-3-
120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

16. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 4 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and next friend
i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 29 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ: Business,
Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o. Ramadugu mandal of
Karimnagar district.

…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR

ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF MAINTENANCE

May it please your Honour,

The above named petitioners humbly submit as under.

1]. That the above named petitioners have filed the F.C.M.C.No. 66 of 2008 for
granting maintenance Under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. against the above said respondent
before the Hon’ble Family Court, Karimnagar. After conducting trial and enquiry the
Hon’ble Family Court was partly allowed and pleased to pass order in the above case, on
30-12-2008. The Family Hon’ble Court passed order in favour of petitioners against the
respondent directing him to pay Rs. 1200/- per month for the 1 st respondent and Rs. 800/-
per month for the 2nd respondent towards maintenance from the date of filing of the
petition i.e., from 05-09-2008.

2]. As per orders passed by the Hon’ble Court the respondent has to deposit an

amount of Rs. 2000/- per month to the petitioners, but the respondent filed appeal before

the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and as per the orders of High

Court of AP the respondent is directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,000/- per month.

Accordingly the respondent is liable to pay Rs. 12,000/- from 05-03-2014 to 05-02-2015

to the petitioners.

Contd…P/2..,
 ::2::

3]. The petitioners submit that she is an house-hold lady and she is living by

borrowing amounts from others and mercy of her parents and the petitioner no. 2 is

minor and they will wait more time for getting the amounts as they are leading miserable

life. The petitioners are unable to maintain themselves and they need minimum basic

needs like food, clothes, education and medical aid etc., immediately as such the amount

is very much required to them. According to the calculation the respondent has to pay

Rs. 12,000/-. It is just and necessary to direct the respondent to pay the said amount to

the petitioners immediately.

P R A Y E R:-
Hence in the interest of justice this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass an order

for directing the respondent to pay an amount of Rs. 12,000/- to the petitioners or in case

of failure by the respondent this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to send the respondent to

jail.

For which act of justice, the petitioners shall ever pray.

Date: Petitioner

VERIFICATION:-
I, the above named petitioner hereby declare that what is stated in the above
petition is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Hence verified on this
the , 2016 at Karimnagar.

Through: Petitioner

T. VENUGOPAL,
Counsel for the Petitioners.
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE
JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT AT
KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2016
IN

F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008

Between:-

Panduga Sunitha & another

…Petitioners
And

Panduga Srinivas
…Respondent.

SUB:- PETITION FILED UNDER

SECTION 125 [3] OF Cr.P.C. FOR
ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER OF
MAINTENANCE

Filed on:

Filed by:

T. VENUGOPAL,
Advocate for the petitioners
 IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE JUDGE OF FAMILY COURT AT
KARIMNAGAR

Cr.M.P.No. OF 2015
IN
F.C.M.C.No. 66 OF 2008
Between:-

13. Panduga Sunitha, W/o. Srinivas, age 23 years, Occ: House-Hold, R/o. H.No. 1-3-
120, Pathabazar locality of Karimnagar town and district.

14. Panduga Vamshi Rao, S/o. Srinivas, aged 4 years, minor

[Petitioner No. 2 being minor, represented by his natural mother and next friend
i.e., petitioner No. 1 Panduga Sunitha]
…Petitioners
And
Panduga Srinivas, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 29 years, Upa Sarpanch, Occ: Business,
Contractor and agriculturist, R/o. Desharajpally V/o. Ramadugu mandal of
Karimnagar district.

…Respondent.

CALCULATION MEMO

Maintenance Amount of @ 600/- per Rs. 7,200=00 petitioner No. 1

month to the 1st petitioner and Rs. 400/- per Rs. 4,800=00 petitioner No. 2
month to the 2nd petitioner towards monthly
maintenance as per orders dated 05-03-
2010. From 05-03-2014 to 05-02-2015 [12
months] passed in F.C. M.C. No. 66/08]

Grand Total Rs. 12,000=00

Date: -02-2015 T. VENUGOPAL,

Counsel for the Petitioners