Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Conk Lu 1972
Conk Lu 1972
Conk Lu 1972
Computer Simulation of
Automotive Air-Conditioning
Condensers
O. Conklu
Ford Motor Co.
720076
Computer Simulation of
Automotive Air-Conditioning
Condensers
O. Conklu
Ford Motor Co.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS PAPER is to describe an analytical air by the condenser (Fig. 1). The engine provides the energy
approach to aid in designing and developing air-conditioning to drive the compressor. The resulting cycle is called vapor
condensers. The mathematical model presented is applicable compression cycle, and is conveniently represented on a pres
to tube-and-fin type condensers, although it can be applied to sure-enthalpy (p-h) diagram (1)*. A schematic diagram of the
other types with minor modifications. refrigeration unit and the corresponding cycle are shown in
In the following sections a general review of air-condition Fig. 2. It is seen that superheated vapor (vapor heated above
ing systems, operation of condensers, and description of con its saturation temperature) refrigerant enters the condenser.
denser simulation model are included. Due to heat transfer between the refrigerant and the air the
vapor is first desuperheated, and then condensed to liquid
DESCRIPTION OF AUTOMOTIVE AIR form. If the resulting temperature is less than the saturation
CONDITIONING SYSTEM temperature, the refrigerant leaves the condenser in the sub
cooled state. This heat transfer process which converts the
An automotive air-conditioning system consists of the fol high-temperature vapor into relatively low-temperature liquid
lowing major components: evaporator; compressor; condenser; is described below.
expansion valve; and blower, air ducts, and registers.
The first four components comprise the refrigeration unit. HEAT TRANSFER PROCESS IN CONDENSER
Blower, ducts, and registers constitute the air-side components
of the system. The heat transfer process in the condenser consists of sev
In operation, refrigerant R-12 is circulated through the re eral steps. As shown in Fig. 3, "hot" refrigerant flows inside
frigeration system by the pumping action of the compressor. the tubes over which colder ambient air is forced. Due to a
Low pressure (hence, low saturation temperature) refrigerant temperature difference (as shown in the figure), heat transfer
in the evaporator provides the "cooling effect" for the overall
system. The heat absorbed from the interior air, the heat
gained from the engine compartment, and the heat generated *Numbers in parentheses designate References at end of
during the compression process are dissipated to the ambient paper.
ABSTRACT
This paper presents a simulation model to predict the ther tential applications of the corresponding computer program
mal performance of automotive air-conditioning condensers. are described. Comparison of the computer results to test
Operation of the air-conditioning system and the function of data shows that the model predicts heat rejections within 3-7%
the condenser are discussed briefly. Details of the formulation and air discharge temperatures within 0.5 F of the laboratory
to calculate various performance characteristics are given. Po test data.
Downloaded from SAE International by Imperial College London, Monday, September 24, 2018
and
4
A sample calculation utilizing this procedure follows.
ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE - The heat rejection rate and
the air discharge temperature are required for the condenser
and operating conditions stated below:
Condenser Data - Aluminum tube-and-fin condenser with the
following data:
Tubes: Staggered; OD = 3/8 in, ID = 0.335 in, 26.4 in long.
Total primary surface area = 7.41 ft2
Derivation of these equations and tabular solutions of O, J, 1sToteu13.crofnad1acr0ely
=
ft2
?, and ß for various operating conditions are given in Ref. 6. Total tube inside area = 6.75 ft2
In Eq. 3, ?t is an assumed value of temperature drop across Total tube inside area = 6.75 ft2
the refrigerant film. Hence, prediction of fr involves an itera Operating Conditions -
tion procedure which is illustrated below (6): Ambient air temperature = 110 F
(a)Assume a ?t, F. Refrigerant condensing temperature = 145 F
(b)Calculate fr from Eq. 3. Air face velocity = 465 ft/min (corresponding to a mass
flow rate of 6330 lb/h)
(c)Calculate (Tr - T1): Calculations[<_->] -
5(b).
7. Calculate the condenser core effectiveness.
5
Let ?t = 19 F
Omitting the intermediate calculations,
fr= 198
6.
The flow chart which is the basis of the computer program
is shown in Fig. 4. This approach is conveniently implemented
on the time-sharing digital computer. Output from such a pro
gram for the preceding example is shown in Fig. 5.
In order to check the accuracy of the simulation results, the
program was run for a certain condenser design with various
7. Airflow rate: operating conditions. Corresponding computer output (list
ing of input omitted) is shown in Fig. 6. These results are
compared to laboratory test data in Table 2. It is seen that:
1. Heat rejections are within 3-7%.
2.Air discharge temperatures are within 0.4 F of the test
data.
Potential applications of the program include:
1. Evaluating an existing (or proposed) condenser design.
2.Optimizing various condenser design parameters to meet
8. the established specifications.
3.Preparing charts for future ready reference.
4.Simulating and/or supporting laboratory tests for conden
ser performance.
Application to evaluate a design is illustrated above.
Design optimization can be accomplished either by iterative
9. analyses, or by incorporating an automatic optimization fea
ture into the program. In automatic optimization, minimum
and maximum values of certain design parameters are speci
fied. Accepted limits of a selected performance parameter
Thus, average temperature rise of air across the condenser is are also set. The program iterates, automatically, on these de
13.5 F. sign parameters and prints the "acceptable" designs. Output
Details of these condenser calculations are included here to from such a program is shown in Fig. 7. In this example, the
illustrate the computation procedure of the computer model condenser tube length, height, and the fin density are op
which is described below. As seen, the hand calculations may timized to provide 17000-22000 Btu/h heat rejection while
become tedious. In the computer inplementation of this pro all other design parameters and variables kept fixed. It must
cedure, tables for various parameters are stored in the program. be noted that when parameters like fin density or the tube
Therefore, the user needs only to specify the condenser dimen size are altered, air and refrigerant film coefficients may differ
sions and the operating conditions. significantly. Therefore, constants c and n, and probably the
Downloaded from SAE International by Imperial College London, Monday, September 24, 2018
6
Downloaded from SAE International by Imperial College London, Monday, September 24, 2018
8
puter results for various air face velocities and condensing ?t = temperature differential across the refrigerant film
temperatures. These results are plotted in Fig. 8 to represent K = thermal conductivity
a set of performance curves for the condenser analyzed. ? = density
g = gravitational acceleration
CONCLUSIONS h = enthalpy
b = tube length
Thermal performance of automotive air-conditioning con µ = absolute viscosity
densers can be simulated successfully with an analytical model. ? = fin effectiveness
Computer implementation of such a model predicts heat re dT,dq = differentials for temperature and heat transfer rate,
jection within 3-7% and air discharge temperature within 0.5 F respectively
of the laboratory test data. Hence, use of the model facili c = thermal capacity rate
tates the design of condensers significantly. The accuracy of
the simulation results is significantly affected by the heat Subscripts
transfer coefficients. Parameters used in calculating the air
c = condenser
film coefficient are determined empirically for a given tube
a = air
and fin design. Refrigerant film coefficient is influenced by
the condensing temperature. Therefore, in design applica r = refrigerant
1 = condenser air inlet
tions or in further correlation studies these parameters must
2 = condenser air outlet
be established prior to analysis.
o = overall (outside for fo)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT P = prime (tube)
F = secondary (fin)
The author wishes to express appreciation to Bradley Ander i = inside
son and Joe Cooper, both of Ford Motor Co., for their contri f = refrigerant liquid phase
butions to this study. Mr. Anderson developed a portion of v = refrigerant vapor phase
the computer program and Mr. Cooper provided test data for fg= gas-to-liquid
the correlation study.
REFERENCES
NOMENCLATURE
1. W. F. Stoecker, "Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning."
Q = heat transfer rate New York: McGraw-Hill, 1958.
New Text ? = condenser effectiveness
core 2.W. Melnyk, "The Automotive Tube-and-Fin Air-Condi
m = mass flow rate tioning Condenser." Paper 690512 presented at SAE Mid
cp = specific heat of air at constant pressure Year Meeting, Chicago, May 1969.
3.W. M. Kays and A. L. London, "Compact Heat Ex
c p r = s p e c i f i c h e a t o f r e f r i g e r a n t a t c o npressure
stant changers." New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.
T =temperature
4.E. D. Grimison, "Correlation and Utilization of New Data
e = base of the natural logorithm on Flow Resistance and Heat Transfer for Cross Flow of Gases
U = overall heat transfer coefficient
area area
Over Tube Banks." Trans. ASME, Vol. 59 (1937).
A =
f = film (heat transfer) coefficient
5.K. A. Gardner, "Efficiency of Extended Surfaces." Trans.
ASME, Vol. 67 (1945), pp. 621-631.
VF = air face velocity 6.J. B. Chaddock, "Film Condensation of Vapor in a Hori
D,d = tube inside diameter in feet and inches, respec zontal Tube." Refrigerant Engineering, Vol. 65, No. 4 (April
tively 1957).
Downloaded from SAE International by Imperial College London, Monday, September 24, 2018
9
APPENDIX
Hence,
which is Eq. 1 given earlier. Results of this integration are given by,
Also, from Eq. A-1,
Thus,
or,
10
and, By combining the Eqs. A-7 and A-8 and using the relation
ca = macp one obtains,
This paper is subject to revision. Statements and opinions been edited by SAE for uniform styling and format. Discussion will be printed
advanced in papers or discussion are the author's and are with the paper if it is published in SAE Transactions. For permission to publish
his responsibility, not the Society's; however, the paper has this paper in full or in part, contact the SAE Publications Division and the
authors.