Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research
Research
net/publication/356907939
CITATIONS READS
0 15
9 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
STUDENT’S PERCEPTIONS OF PRECEPTORSHIP LEARNING OUTCOMES IN BSN PROGRAM AT PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NURSING IN SINDH. View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Sikander Memon on 09 December 2021.
66
A LUMHS
Methodology Table 1: Demographic Characteristics
Descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at tertiary
Variables Frequency %
care public hospital Karachi, Pakistan since September 2017
to December 2017.All the staff Nurses working in cardiology Age 35.36* 9.12**
and cardiac surgery departments who had spent at least three Gender
months in institution and willing to participate were included
using convenient sampling technique. Male 16 36.36
An adopted questionnaire “Nurses’ perceptions and practices: Female 28 63.64
contributions to care quality” was used for data collection. It
is a Likert scale with four options; Never, Rarely, Often and Nursing Qualification
Always, consisted of 25 items categorized in seven RN 26 59.09
dimensions; Patient satisfaction, Health promotion,
BSN 18 40.91
Prevention of complications, Well-being and self-care,
Functional re-adaptation, Nursing care organization, MSN NIL 00.00
Responsibility and rigor. The tool is valid and reliable having Department
Crohncach’s alpha of 0.9409.
Permission was taken from Chief Nursing superintendent; Cardiac ward 10 22.73
thereafter proceed to the respective participants and CICU 08 18.18
explained objectives and purpose of the study then asked to
CCU 12 27.27
give consent in written form. After it, questionnaire forms
were distributed in participants and explained each point of Cardiac Surgery Ward 06 13.64
questionnaire for minimizing the error. Each form was Cardiac Surgery ICU 08 18.18
checked at the time of collection to make sure of their
completion on spot. Statistics/Data Analysis software Designation
(STATA), version 12.1 was used for data analysis. Head Nurse 03 6.82
Staff Nurse 41 93.18
Results
A total of 44 nurses participated in the study. With regard to Total Work Experience
demographic data of participants (Table 1), the mean age Less than one Year 02 4.55
(±SD) of the participants was 35.36 (±9.12) years. Majority of
participants were female (63.64%) while male were (36.36%), 1 – 5 years 10 22.73
there is a predominance of staff nurses (93.18%) whereas head 6 – 10 years 20 45.45
nurses were (6.82%). More than half (59.09 %) of the
11 – 15 years 04 9.09
participating nurses have Three Years Registered Nurse (RN)
qualification followed by Bachelors of Science(BSN) degree 16 – 20 years 02 4.55
(40.91%). with regards to department of work, most of the 21 years and above 06 13.64
respondents were from CCU (27.27%) after that Cardiac ward
(22.73%), CICU and Cardiac Surgery ICU (18.18%) and
Cardiac Surgery Ward (13.64%). when asked for work Mean age of participants*, Standard deviation of age**
experience, there is a high proportion of nurses (45.45 %)
having experience of six to ten years, (22.73%) have one to five In the results of the scale “Nurses’ perceptions and practices
years, (9.09%) have 11 to 15 years, (13.64%) have experience that contribute to quality care, within the dimension of
of 21 years and above, two nurses have less than one year (4.55 Patient satisfaction (Table 2) most participants replied Always
%) and two have 16 to 20 years’ experience (4.55%). (72.73%), followed by Often (13.64%), Rarely (9.09%) and
Never (4.55%) in response of “Nurses show respect for the
abilities, beliefs, values and desires of individual patient while
providing nursing care.” In activity “Nurses are constantly
seeking to show empathy in interactions with the patient”
(59.09%) replied Always, (22.73%) Often and (18.18%)
Rarely. In reaction of “Nurses involve significant cohabitants
of individual patient in the nursing care process” most
participants replied Rarely (63.64%) followed by Always
(18.18%), Often (9.09%) and Never (9.09%).
67
A LUMHS
Table 2: Patient Satisfaction
Within context of dimension Health Promotion (Table 3), then Rarely (27.27%), Always (18.18%) and Never (4.55%).
most participants(68.18%) replied Rarely, followed by Often In reply of “Nurses provide information that generates
(22.73%), Always (4.55%) and Never (4.55%) in response of cognitive learning and new abilities in the patient”, most
“Nurses identify the health situation of the population and the participants responded Rarely (36.36%), after that Often and
resources of patient/family and community”. Always (27.27%) and Never (9.09%).
In response of activity “Nurses use the hospitalization time to
promote healthy lifestyles”, majority replied Often (50 %),
f % f % f % f % f %
“Nurses identify the health situation of
the population and the resources of 02 4.55 30 68.18 10 22.73 02 4.55 44 100.0
patient”.
Within the dimension of Prevention of Complications (Table (45.45%) followed by Always (40.91%), Never (9.09%) and
4), majority of participants answered Rarely (40.91%), Rarely (4.55%). Most nurses replied Often (40.91%) then
followed by Often and Always (22.73%) and Never (13.64%) Always (31.82%), Rarely (22.73%) and Never (4.55%) in reply
in response of “Nurses identify potential problems of the of “Nurses evaluate the interventions that help prevent
patient.” In the response of “Nurses prescribe and perform problems or minimize undesirable effects.”
interventions to prevent complications” most respondent
reacted Often
68
A LUMHS
Table 4: Prevention of Complications
Regarding dimension Well-being and Self-care, most In the answer of “Nurses evaluate the interventions that help
participants replied Rarely (45.45%, after that Often (36.36%), improve the patient’s well-being and daily activities”, most of
Always (13.64%) and Never (4.55%) in reply of “Nurses the nurses respond Often (45.45%), followed by Rarely
identify patient’s problems that will help improve the patient’s (36.36%), Never and Always (9.09%). In the response of
well-being and daily activities”. In the reply of “Nurses activity “Nurses address problematic situations identified that
prescribe and perform interventions that will help improve will help improve the patient’s well-being and daily activities”,
the patient’s well-being and daily activities.” Half of there is predominance of reply Rarely (45.45%), after that
respondents answered Rarely (50.00%), following Often Often (22.73%), Always (18.18%) and Never (13.64%)
(36.36%), Always (9.09%) and Never (4.55%).
Table 5: Well-beingand Self-care
f % f % f % f % f %
“Nurses identify patient’s problems
that will help improve the patient’s 02 4.55 20 45.45 16 36.36 06 13.64 444 100.0
well-being and daily activities.”
In the matter of Functional Readaptation dimension, more of “Nurses plan discharge of hospitalized patients in health
than half of participants reacted Always (54.55%) followed by institutions, according to each patient’s needs andcommunity
Often (36.36%) and Rarely (9.09%) in the reply of “Nurses resources”, most of the respondent replied Always (54.55%),
ensure continuity of nursing service provision”. In the answer then Rarely (22.73%), Often (13.64%) and Never (9.09%).
69
A LUMHS
In the response of “Nurses optimize the abilities of the patient patients for their individual adaptation and teach, instruct
and his/her significant cohabitants to manage the prescribed and train patientson what is required for their functional
therapy”, most of the nurses answered Often (45.45%) readaptation”, most of participants reacted Always (40.91%)
following Rarely (36.36%), Never (13.64%) and Always then Often (27.27%), Rarely (18.18%) and Never (13.64%).
(4.55%). In the activity “Nurses teach, instruct and train
Table 6: FunctionalReadaptation
In regard to the Nursing Care Organization, there is a Regarding activity “Nurses know the hospital’s policies”, most
predominance of nurses who replied Always (72.73%), of the participants answered Always (63.64%) after that
followed by Often and Rarely (13.64%) in the response of Rarely (18.18 %), Often ( 13.64%) and Never (4.55%).
“Nurses know how to handle the nursing record system”.
“Nurses know the hospital’s policies.” 02 4.55 08 18.18 06 13.64 28 63.64 44 100.0
About Responsibility and Rigor dimension a high number of Aiming to ensure well-being and self-care of patients”,
the participants answered Often (45.45%) followed by Always majority of respondents reacted Often and Rarely (36.36%)
(36.36%) and Rarely (18.18%) in the response of “Nurses after that Always (22.73%) and Never (4.55%). In the response
show responsibility for the decisions they make and for the of “Nurses show technical/scientific rigor in the
acts they perform and delegate, aiming to prevent implementation of nursing interventions aiming to prevent
complications”. In the answer to “Nurses show responsibility complications” most of the participants replied often and
for the decisions they make and for the acts they perform and always(40.91%) followed by rarely(18.18)
delegate.
67
A LUMHS
Table 8: Responsibility and Rigor
67
A LUMHS
responses Often in “Use the hospitalization time to promote expenses16.
healthy lifestyles” , which is in line with their study. These Most of the nurses replied Always in this study for the
finding are significant for concern. Nurses are the foundation activities “Nurses plan discharge of patients according to each
of patients’ behavioral changes by means of approaches patient’s needs and community resources and Teach, instruct
focused on health promotion15. But, the findings of this study and train patients for adaptation and teach, instruct and train
recommend that this may not be executed by nurses in patients what is required for functional Readaptation”; mostly
hospital setups. In the dimension “Prevention of answered often in the response of “Nurses optimize the
Complication”, results showed that mostly nurses Often abilities of the patient and his/her cohabitants to manage the
perform and evaluate intervention to prevent complication prescribed therapy”. Mabire et. al. did a study and reported
but they have rarely able to Identify potential problems of the that discharge planning helps in transition from hospital to
patient. These finding are differ from the results of the home care and decrease post-discharged complications and
aforementioned study. According to American Nurses adverse events but comprehensive discharged planning did
Association, nurses must increase their efforts for not benefit the patients results in less readiness and frequent
development and implementation nursing actions to support readmission within 30 days17. Most of the respondents
promotion of health and prevention of disease/illness and answered Rarely in the activities “Nurses show responsibility
disability7. In regards to dimension “Well-being and for the decisions they make and for the acts they perform and
Self-care”, most of the participants replied Rarely while few delegate, aiming to ensure well-being and self-care of
answered Always which are oppose to the findings of the patients”, “Nurses show technical/scientific rigor in the
study by Martins et. al14. The findings suggest that there is a implementation of nursing interventions that help improve
strong need to focus on this domain as it is necessary for a the patient’s well-being and daily activities” and “Nurses
healthy recovery. In the context of “Functional Readaptation”, supervise the activities that support nursing interventions
majority of respondents answered Always in the activity and the activities they delegate.” Even after delegating activity,
“Nurses ensure continuity of nursing service provision”. it is the responsibility of the nurses to supervise subordinates
Continuity of care insures high quality care and cost for patient safety and prevent unwanted outcomes. Nurses are
effectiveness. If care is episodic, chronically ill patients might professionally and legally responsible for providing care,
develop adverse effects and complications; results in high decisions taken and its consequences18.
References Saeedi Z. Nurses’ perspectives on analysis. Int J Res Med Sci. 2015
quality of nursing care: a qualita- Jan 10;3(November):1832–8.
1. Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical tive study in Iran. Int J Health 9. Martins MMFP da S, Goncalves
error-the third leading cause of Care Qual Assur. 2007 Jun MN da C, Ribeiro OMPL, Tron-
death in the US. BMJ. 19;20(4):320–8. chin DMR. Quality of nursing
2016;353(i2139):1–5. 6. Nursing and Midwifery Board of care: instrument development
2. Irfan SM, Ijaz A. Comparison of Australia - Registered nurse and validation. Rev Bras Enferm.
Service Quality Between Private standards for practice [Internet]. 2016;69(5):920–6.
and Public Hospitals : Empirical [cited 2018 Jul 31]. Available 10. Barret D. Degree level education
Evidences From Pakistan. J Qual from: http://www.nursingmid- in nursing – time to move the
Technol Manag. w i f e r y b o a r d . g o v - discussion on. | Evidence-Based
2011;VII(I):1–22. . a u / C o d e s - G u i d e - Nursing blog. 2016;
3. Siddiq A. QUALITY OF lines-Statements/Professional-sta 11. Abdul Rahman H, Jarrar M, Don
HEALTHCARE SERVICES IN ndards/registered-nurse-standard MS. Nurse Level of Education,
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE HOSPI- s-for-practice.aspx Quality of Care and Patient Safety
TALS OF PESHAWAR , PAKI- 7. American Nursing Association in the Medical and Surgical Wards
STAN : A COMPARATIVE [ANA]. What is Nursing & in Malaysian Private Hospitals: A
STUDY USING SERVQUAL. What do nurses do? | ANA Enter- Cross-sectional Study. Glob J
c i t y u n i v e r s i t y. e d u . p k . prise [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Health Sci. 2015 Apr
2016;06(02):242–55. Jul 31]. Available from: https://w- 23;7(6):331–7.
4. Gunther M, Alligood MR. A w w. nu r s i ng wor l d . org / pr a c - 12. Bob Wertz. Improving Patient
discipline‐specific determination t i c e - p o l i c y / w or k - Participation in Health Care -
of high quality nursing care. J Adv force/what-is-nursing/ NEJM Catalyst [Internet]. 2018
Nurs. 2002 May;38(4):353–359. 8. Koy V, Yunibhand J, Angsuroch Y. [cited 2018 Aug 5]. Available
5. Tafreshi MZ, Pazargadi M, Abed Nursing care quality: a concept from: https://catalyst.nejm.org/-
67
A LUMHS
improving-patient-participa- 15. International Council of Nurses Goulet C. Nursing discharge
tion-care/ (icn). Definition of nursing. planning for older medical
13. Ambigapathy R, Chia YC, Ng CJ. Retrieved June. 2010;2(1):2011. inpatients in Switzerland: A
Patient involvement in 16. The Sentinel Watch. Different cross-sectional study. Geriatr
decision-making: a cross-section- Nursing Roles in the Continuum Nurs (Minneap). 2015 Nov
al study in a Malaysian primary of Care – The Sentinel Watch 1;36(6):451–7.
care clinic. BMJ Open. 2016 Jan [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2018 Aug 18. Nursing and Midwifery Board of
4;6(1):e010063. 5]. Available from: https://ww- Ireland. NMBI - NMBI Scope of
14. Ribeiro O, Martins M, Tronchin w. a m e r i c a n s e n t i - Practice_ Responsibility, account-
D. Nursing care quality: a study nel.edu/blog/2015/07/21/nurs- ability & autonomy.
carried out in Portuguese hospi- ings-role-in-the-continuum-of-ca
tals. Rev Enferm Ref. 2017 Sep re/
29;IV Série(No14):89–100. 17. Mabire C, Büla C, Morin D,
67