Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Water Leakage tracking data for the water pool at various

New Melting Project Water Pool blocks


1. Soft Water Pool
Soft Water Pool Water Level
Location
Dat
CP1 CP2 Average
e Date
No. Diff ∑ Diff Diff ∑ Diff Avg. Avg. ∑
Reading(cm) (mm) (mm) Reading(cm) (mm) (mm) Diff(mm) Diff(mm)
1 4/23/2024 116.8 -- 0 151.5 -- 0 -- 0.00
2 4/24/2024 117.4 -6 -6 151.8 -3 -3 -4.5 -4.50
3 4/25/2024 117.5 -1 -7 152.2 -4 -7 -2.5 -7.00
4 4/27/2024 117.7 -2 -9 152.4 -2 -9 -2 -9.00
5 Average -2.25 -2.25 -2.25

Soft Water Pool Evaporation Data


Water level in
Jar no. :1 CCM WP Avg @ CCM Jar no. :2 CCM WP mm
Weight Avg per Weight Avg per
Date (g) Diff day Date (g) Diff day
5/7/2024 1250 5/7/2024 1325 0.00
5/8/2024 1240 10 10 15 5/8/2024 1305 20 20 1.91
5/9/2024 1225 15 12.5 17.5 5/9/2024 1280 25 22.5 2.23
5/10/2024 1210 15 13.3333333 16.66667 5/10/2024 1265 15 20 2.12
5/11/2024 1195 15 13.75 16.25 5/11/2024 1250 15 18.75 2.07
5/13/2024 1170 25 13.3333333 15 5/13/2024 1225 25 16.6666667 1.91
Average -- -- 15 -- -- 1.91

From the above data, the drop of the water level for an average day is 2.25mm and the recorded
evaporation for this location on average is 1.91mm. the difference between the two (2.25mm-
1.91mm = 0.34mm) is the water level lost due to leakage.
When converting this drop over the surface area of the pool we get the lost volume of water per
day due to this leakage
Volume Lost = Surface area X Water level drop
= 11.65m*42.67m*0.34mm
=0.169m3 or 169Ltr.
Considering the size of the pool the lost water per day is 0.01% and we can conclude that the
water tightness of the reservoir is satisfactory.
2. CCM Turbid Circulation Advection pool

CCM Turbid Circulation Advection pool Water Level


Location
Averag
Date No. Date
CP1 e
Reading(cm) Diff (mm) ∑ Diff (mm)
1
2 4/23/2024 71.7 -- 0
3 4/24/2024 72.1 -4 -4
4 4/25/2024 72.5 -4 -8
5 4/27/2024 72.9 -4 -12
6 4/29/2024 72.4 5 -7
7 5/2/2024 72.8 -4 -11
8 5/7/2024 73.1 -3 -14
9 5/8/2024 73.2 -1 -15
10 5/9/2024 73.4 -2 -17
12 5/11/2024 73.7 -3 -20
13 5/13/2024 74 -3 -23
Average -2

Soft Water Pool Evaporation Data


Water
Avg @ level
Jar no. :1 CCM WP CCM Jar no. :2 CCM WP in mm
Weight Avg per Weight Avg per
Date (g) Diff day Date (g) Diff day
5/7/2024 1250 5/7/2024 1325 0.00
5/8/2024 1240 10 10 15 5/8/2024 1305 20 20 1.91
5/9/2024 1225 15 12.5 17.5 5/9/2024 1280 25 22.5 2.23
5/10/2024 1210 15 13.3333333 16.66667 5/10/2024 1265 15 20 2.12
5/11/2024 1195 15 13.75 16.25 5/11/2024 1250 15 18.75 2.07
5/13/2024 1170 25 13.3333333 15 5/13/2024 1225 25 16.6666667 1.91
Average -- -- 15 -- -- 1.91

From the above data, the drop of the water level for an average day is 2.00mm and the recorded
evaporation for this location on average is 1.91mm. the difference between the two (2.00mm-
1.91mm = 0.09mm) is the water level lost due to leakage.
When converting this drop over the surface area of the pool we get the lost volume of water per
day due to this leakage
Volume Lost = Surface area X Water level drop
= 11.65m*8.62m*0.09mm
=0.01m3 or 10Ltr.
Considering the size of the pool the lost water per day is 0.0026% and we can conclude that the
water tightness of the reservoir is satisfactory.

3. Rolling-2 Induction heating furnace pool


Rolling-2 Induction heating furnace pool Water Level
Location
Dat
e Date CP1 CP2 Average
No. Diff ∑ Diff Diff ∑ Diff Avg. Avg. ∑
Reading(cm) (mm) (mm) Reading(cm) (mm) (mm) Diff(mm) Diff(mm)
1 5/8/2024 53.2 0 50.4 0 -- 0.00
2 5/9/2024 53.6 -4 -4 50.8 -4 -4 -4 -4.00
3 5/10/2024 53.4 2 -2 51 -2 -6 0 -4.00
4 5/11/2024 53.6 -2 -4 51.3 -3 -9 -2.5 -6.50
5 5/13/2024 54.1 -5 -9 51.8 -5 -14 -5 -11.50
6 5/14/2024 54.5 -4 -13 52.5 -7 -21 -5.5 -17.00
7 Average -- -2.83

Rolling-2 Induction heating furnace pool Evaporation Data


Jar no. :1 Rolling 2 WP Jar no. :2 Rolling 2 WP
Water
Weight Di Avg per Avg @ Weight Di Avg per level
Date (g) ff day R-2 Date (g) ff day in mm
5/7/2024 1100 5/7/2024 1210 0.00
5/8/2024 1090 10 10 10 5/8/2024 1200 10 10 1.27
5/9/2024 1080 10 10 11.25 5/9/2024 1185 15 12.5 1.43
5/10/202 11.6666 5/10/202 13.333333
4 1070 10 10 7 4 1170 15 3 1.49
5/11/202 5/11/202
4 1055 15 11.25 11.875 4 1160 10 12.5 1.51
5/13/202 12.9166 5/13/202 13.333333
4 1025 30 12.5 7 4 1130 30 3 1.64
Average -- -- 12.9 -- -- 1.64
From the above data, the drop of the water level for an average day is 2.83mm and the recorded
evaporation for this location on average is 1.64mm. the difference between the two (2.83mm-
1.64mm = 1.19mm) is the water level lost due to leakage.
When converting this drop over the surface area of the pool we get the lost volume of water per
day due to this leakage
Volume Lost = Surface area X Water level drop
= 19.30m*8.10m*1.19mm
=0.186m3 or 186Ltr.
Considering the size of the pool the lost water per day is 0.034% and we can conclude that the
water tightness of the reservoir is satisfactory.
4. Oxygen Plant Pool
Oxygen Pool Water level
Location
Dat
e Date CP1
No. Reading(c Diff ∑ Diff
m) (mm) (mm)
1 5/9/2024
5/10/202
2 4 46 -- -1
5/11/202
3 4 46.1 -1 -1
5/13/202
4 4 46.9 -8 -9
Average -3

Oxygen Pool Evaporation Data


Jar no. :1 Oxygen WP Jar no. :2 Oxygen WP Water
Weight Di Avg per Avg @ Weight Di Avg per level
Date (g) ff day Ox Date (g) ff day in mm
5/7/2024 1315 5/7/2024 1225 0.00
5/8/2024 1300 15 15 15 5/8/2024 1210 15 15 1.91
5/9/2024 1275 25 20 20 5/9/2024 1185 25 20 2.55
5/10/202 5/10/202
4 1255 20 15 17.5 4 1165 20 20 2.23
5/11/202 5/11/202
4 1230 25 11.25 15.625 4 1145 20 20 1.99
5/13/202 15.833333 19.1666 5/13/202
4 1160 70 3 7 4 1090 55 22.5 2.44
Average -- 19.16 -- -- 2.44

From the above data, the drop of the water level for an average day is 3.00mm and the recorded
evaporation for this location on average is 2.44mm. the difference between the two 3.00mm-2.4
4mm = 0.56mm) is the water level lost due to leakage.
When converting this drop over the surface area of the pool we get the lost volume of water per
day due to this leakage
Volume Lost = Surface area X Water level drop
= 6.05m*3.80m*0.56mm
=0.013m3 or 13Ltr.
Considering the size of the pool the lost water per day is 0.025% and we can conclude that the
water tightness of the reservoir is satisfactory.

You might also like