Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IndEco L04a
IndEco L04a
1
Composition of Indian Industry
Sector Weight (%) in IIP
(2011-12=100)
Mining 14.373
Manufacturing 77.633
Electricity 7.994
Total 100
Core Industries
2
Structure
3
Industrial Growth In India
Four Distinct Phases
Phase I which covered the period of the first three phase (i.e. the period from
1951 to 1965)
Phase II which covered the period from 1965 to 1980 was marked by
industrial deceleration and structural retrogression
Phase III which covered the period of 1980’s (1980-81 to 1990-91) was
marked by industrial recovery
Phase IV covering the post-reform period (i.e. the period 1991-92 onwards)
4
Phase IV: The Post Reform (1991-92 onwards)
5
Causes of Unsatisfactory Performance in the
Post–reform Period
The main causes for unsatisfactory performance of the industrial sector in the
post-reform period are as follows:
Exposure to external competition
Slowdown in investment
The infrastructural constraints
Difficulties in obtaining funds for expansion
Contraction in consumer demand
Sluggish growth in exports
Anomalies in tariff structure etc.
6
Problems and Obstacles to
Industrial Development in India
7
INDUSTRIAL POLICY 1991: Objectives
8
• Sound policy framework encompassing encouragement of entrepreneurship,
development of indigenous technology through investment in research and
development, bringing in new technology, dismantling of the regulatory
system, development of the capital markets and increasing
competitiveness for the benefit of the common man.
9
• Foreign investment and technology collaboration will be welcomed to obtain
higher technology, to increase exports and to expand the production base.
10
• Government will fully protect the interests of labour, enhance their welfare
and equip them in all respects to deal with the inevitability of technological
change. Labour will be made an equal partner in progress and prosperity
• The major objectives of the new industrial policy package will be to build
on the gains already made, correct the distortions or weaknesses that may
have crept in, maintain a sustained growth in productivity and gainful
employment and attain international competitiveness.
11
INDUSTRIAL POLICY 1991: Policy Initiatives
1. Industrial Licensing
2. Foreign Investment
5. MRTP Act.
12
INDUSTRIAL POLICY 1991
• Industrial licensing:
– Modified industrial licensing policy to ease restrictions on capacity creation,
respond to emerging domestic & global opportunities by improving productivity
– Abolished industrial licensing for most industries but for 18 categories
– Small scale sector reserved
• Foreign Investment:
– FDI (up to 51% foreign equity) permitted in high priority industries (high
investment and advanced technology) & export oriented companies
13
INDUSTRIAL POLICY 1991
• Foreign Technology Agreements:
Towards technological dynamism, automatic approval for technological
agreements related to high priority industries; eased procedures for hiring
foreign technical expertise
• Public Sector Policy:
Restructuring pubic sector units, raise resources through pubic
participation PSUs, refer sick units to Board of Industrial & Financial
Reconstruction
• MRTP Act:
Abolished scrutiny of investment decision of MRTP companies etc.
14
Current Scenario
• Substantial changes:
– Only six industries require compulsory licensing
– Only three industries reserved for the public sector
– Relation of restriction on FDI: FDI up to 100 % under automatic route for
most manufacturing activities in Special Economic Zones; FDI ceiling in
pvt banking sector up to 74%; oil exploration (100%); natural gas and LNG
pipelines (100%); telecom (74%)
• Small Scale industries sector: reduced # of items reserved from 821 (1991) to
506 (2005)
15
Lessons from India
• Industrial Policy should not be about:
– Controlling Prices
– Controlling Quantity
– Specifying Geographical Location of Activity
– Preemption by Public Sector
– Policy Body, Regulatory Body and Service Provider being Government
Agencies
16
Public and Private Sectors
17
Strengths and Weaknesses of Markets
18
Governement Vs Markets in India
• Indian economy is replete with examples where govt intervenes and thereby underestimates markets
unnecessarily, i.e., even in areas where there are no “market failures”.
• Frequent and unpredictable imposition of blanket stock limits on commodities under Essential
Commodities Act, 1955 distorts the incentives for the creation of storage infrastructure by the pvt
sector.
• Regulation of prices of drugs, through the DPCO 2013, has led to increase in the price of the
regulated pharmaceutical drug vis-à-vis that of a similar drug whose price is not regulated.
• Govt policies in the foodgrain markets has led to the emergence of govt as the largest procurer and
hoarder of rice and wheat crowding out. This has led to burgeoning food subsidy burden and
inefficiencies in the markets.
• Analysis of debt waivers shows that full waiver beneficiaries consume less, save less, invest less and
are less productive after the waiver when compared to the partial beneficiaries. Debt waivers disrupt
the credit culture.
• Therefore, govt must systematically examine areas where the govt needlessly intervenes and
undermines markets.
19
Public Sector
Classification
• CPSEs: Cos where the direct holding of the GoI or of other CPSEs is 51% or
more;
• PSBs: Banks where the direct holding of the Central/state govt or other PSEs is
51% or more;
• State Level (SLPEs): Cos where the direct holding of the state govt or other
SLPEs is 51% or more.
20
Performance of Public Sector
21
Problems
• Wrong price policy
• Inefficiency
• Underutilization of capacity
• Failures in planning and execution of projects
22
Private Sector in India
The role of Private Sector in Indian Economy
• Contributions to
National output
Gross domestic savings
Gross capital formation
23
The Twin Balance Sheet Problem
The financial vulnerability of banks (in terms of NPA) and the
corporate debt (debt-equity ratio) are closely related.
24
MSME Sector
• Removed the distinction between manufacturing and service MSMEs.
Category Investment in plant and Annual turnover
machinery or equipment
Micro < 1 crore < 5 crore
Small < 10 crore < 50 crore
Medium < 50 crore < 250 crore
Economic Survey 2021-22, p 37
25
Challenges of MSMEs
• Finance
• Infrastructure
• Competition
• Technology
• Marketing and promotion
• GST related
• Nascent start-up ecosystem
26
Key Initiatives for MSME’s Growth
Initiatives Status
In-principle approval for loans up to 1 crore within 59 minutes 1,38,646 number of loans, involving 37,106 crore have been
through online portal. disbursed up to Oct, 2019.
Interest subvention of 2% for all GST registered MSMEs on SIDBI has received and settled the claims of 18 crore during Nov.
incremental credit up to 1 crore. 2018 – Mar. 2019.
All companies with a turnover of more than 500 crore to be 329 companies have registered on TReDS portal by Mar. 2020.
mandatorily on TReDS platform to enable entrepreneurs to access
credit from banks, based on their upcoming receivables.
All CPSUs to compulsorily procure at least 25 % from MSEs. During 2019-20 (upto Oct 2019) CPSUs have procured goods and
services worth 15936.39 crore from 59903 MSEs.
Out of 25% procurement mandated from MSE, 3% reserved for During 2019-20 (upto Oct 2019) procurement from 1471 women
women entrepreneurs. MSEs is of 242.12 crore
All CPSUs to compulsorily procure through GeM portal. 258 CPSUs have been registered on GeM portal and 50.30% of
orders value on GeM portal is from MSEs.
20 Technology Centers and 100 Extension Centers to be established Six locations have been identified for TCs.
at the cost of 6000 crore.
Govt of India to bear 70% of the cost for establishing Pharma Four districts viz., Solan, Indore, Aurangabad and Pune were
clusters. selected.
27
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
• Objectives
To solve the twin balance sheet (TBS) problem
To develop a robust corporate bond market
To improve the credit environment
To streamline the corporate insolvency resolution process
To prevent value destruction in the presence of distress.
28
Reference
• Economic Survey, various issues.
• NITI Aayog, “Strategy for New India @75”, 2018, chapter 4.
29