Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture SCR CPesce #01B
Lecture SCR CPesce #01B
Lecture SCR CPesce #01B
Celso P. Pesce
Professor of Mechanical Sciences
PhD in Ocean Engineering, MSc Marine Hydrodynamics, Naval Architect
ceppesce@usp.br
TLP
FPSO
junta
flexível enrijecedores de Bending stiffener
flexão
flexible joint
bóia
intermediária
Floaters
Subsurface buoy
flutuadores
Bending restrictors
restritor de Weight anchor
curvatura poita
General Kirshoff-Clebsh-Love Equations
(KCL equations)
Curved bars – large displacements, small deformations
T 2u
Q v w Q w v f u (t ) m
s t 2
Q v 2v
Q w u T w f v (t ) m Mu
s t2
Q w 2w
T v Q v u f w (t ) m
s t 2 t=u
M u 2 u Mv
M v w M w v K u (t ) I uu Qv
s t 2 P’
M v v
2 v
M w u M u w Q w K v (t ) I vv
s t 2 n
T
b
w
M w 2 w
M u v M v u Q v K w (t ) I ww
s t 2
Qw
Mw
The planar static problem
with:
f t q sin ct ( s )
f n q cos cn ( s )
dT d
Q ft 0
ds ds ct (s); cn (s)
dQ d
T fn 0
ds ds
Static forces due to
dM
Q 0 . current
ds
v u
(s) j
y
x k
i
The planar dynamic problem
Oscillating hydrodynamic
forces
Hang-off
boundary-
Τ d 2 ut
layer T + Q Q ct t q sin m 2
s ds s t
( s, t ) ( s) ( s, t )
Q d 2u n
ε ( s, t ) ( s ) e ( s, t ) Τ Q Τ cn n q cos m 2
s ds s t
Τ ( s, t ) T ( s ) ( s, t )
Q(s, t ) Q( s) ( s, t ) un d
Perturbations around the
ut (1 ( s )) ( s, t )
static equilibrium s ds
configuration
TDP ut d
boundary- n t un e
y layer (s,t) s ds
x
Kinematic relations
Separating static and dynamic parts:
Static equilibrium,
tangential direction
T d 0
Q c q sin
s
t
ds
d 2 ut
T + Q t m 2
s ds s t
Static equilibrium,
normal direction
Q d 0
T c q cos
s
n
ds
d 2u n
Q n m 2
s ds s t
Linearized Dynamic Equations
d
T +
s ds
2 ut
Q t m 2 d 2 ut
s t T + Q t m 2
s ds s t
d 2u n
d Q T n m 2
Q s ds s t
s ds
2u n
T n m 2
s t
Two dynamic equilibrium equations,
linearized around the static
equilibrium configurations
Linearized Dynamic Equations: neglecting bending stiffness
Two dynamic equilibrium equations,
d 2 ut linearized around the static
Negleting T t m 2 equilibrium configurations
bending stiffness s ds t
d 2u n
T n m 2
effects:
ds s t
ut d
un e Kinematic relations
s ds
un d
ut 1
s ds
1
ct ( s ) a DU ( s ) U ( s ) CT cos2 ( s )
2
1
cn ( s ) a DU ( s ) U ( s ) C D sin 2 ( s )
2
Oscillating hydrodynamic forces
Inertial parcels
ut
vt U cos w t
t Gravitational waves
Relative velocity
u velocity filed
components to the v n n U sin w n
flow t
The bending stiffness effect
d
M EI ( s, t ) EI c ( s, t )
ds
e
M d 2 c
Q EI Q EI 2 EI
s s ds s
2 T d 2u n
EI 2 T EI cn n q cos m 2
s s ds s t
The bending stiffness effect
Flexural lenght at TDP q
0
Defining: T0
EI
T0 Static curvature
Small length
at TDP
parameter
c
tˆ 0 t
L Transversal wave celerity L
due to geometric stiffness,
T0
at TDP c0
Second-order m ma
term
The nondimensional dynamic equation in the normal direction reads:
2
2
ˆ ˆ ˆ 2 d ˆ 2uˆn
ˆ cˆn ˆ n ˆ 0 cos 2
sˆ 2 sˆ dsˆ s
ˆ tˆ
The bending stiffness effect
ˆ
ˆˆ cˆ ˆ ˆ cos uˆ n (1 O( 2 ))
2
s tˆ 2
n n 0
ˆ
Time scales
L T
t1 cg
cg (m ma )
Wave celerity associated to
geometric rigidity
t2
cg 2 EI
c (i )
(f i ) (m ma )
f
L
t (i )
3 (i ) Wave celerity associated to
cf bending stiffness
ca
EA
t (i )
4 (i ) m
cf Wave celerity associated to
axial stiffness
L
t5 EI
ca ( s)
T (s)
Local flexural length
[.
• There are several time scales that govern the overall dynamics
of a riser.
TPN
FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION AND
OFFSHORE MECHANICS LABORATORY