June 26, 2024 IN THE STATE OF TN, CIRCUIT COURT vs Christopher Daniels, MOOR protected under 1990 ADA ACT STATE OF TN, INC, vs Chirstopher Daniels, MOOR/protected under 1990 ADA ACT (1) MOTION TO: a. DISMISS HEARING AND GIVE Christopher Daniels his own BID BOND DUE TO FAILURE TO ESTABLISH SUFFICIENCY OF PLEADING, DUE PROCESS & Safety VIOLATIONS, 18 USC 1341 Scam, RICO and TREASON BY: i, State of TN ii, Public Defender iil, Clerk, Registry (BID BOND NUMBER) iv. Department of Defense, DOJ and General Counselors (Foreign Agents see 28 USC 3002) (2) See all oaths of offices of EVERYONE INVOLVED IN THIS 18 USC 1341 SCAMIRICO or step down! This is the 2 time; | requested their motion. | believe they don't have their oath because 28 USC 3002 proves they are foreigner pedos working in a land (AMERICAS) that was not lost! (3) REQUEST RESPOND IMMEDIATELY UNDER UCC, CHARTER, TITLES II AND III OF THE 1990 ADA ACT, AND GOD’s NATURAL LAW. (4) FAILURE TO RESPOND CAUSES A PREVENTABLE HEALTH ISSUE, LEGAL ABUSE SYNDROME WHICH IS A CRIME. (8) THE USA INC FOREIGN PEDO CORPORATIONS CANNOT CONTINUE TO STEAL ADA FUNDS AND DENY ADA RIGHTS AS ADA VIOLATIONS ARE $75,000 for the first 1990 ADA Offense and $155,000 thereafter. This applies.(6) Close out Case/BID BOND (7) Dissolve the above listed corporation as per QUO WARRANTO, PRO CONFESSO, Charter violation and UCC violations (8) Turn over individuals and companies Health Hazard Bonding Information as per UCC. (9) Military Tribunals as all the courts from the EEOC process to the Supreme Court are rigged! (10) Acknowledge the 1990 ADA and ADA Advocates vs lies and pretend that my ADA Clients don’t have a right to select any represent as per 6" Amendment, God’s Natural Law, Magna Carta, and Charter of the Forest! First, when privately owned corporations such as the TN Courts and its subcontractors violate due process, and safety, they no longer have jurisdiction over any MOOR/Native Hawaiian We MOORS/HAWAIIANS are very familiar how the Bid Bond USA INC GAME WORKS. and how the game is played using your birth certificate, SSN, Car Tags, Sheriffs Office, IRS, Courts and Federal Reserves see: THE USA INC RUNS LARGEST SEX TRAFFICKING & PRISON RING w/HELP OF DEBT COLLECTORS (bitchute.com) and Exhibit 1, Quo Warranto and ExhibitS, Justice ‘Anna's Affidavit Second, my ADA Client, Christopher Daniels is a MOOR vs a UNITED STATES INC FOREIGN PEDO CORPORATION STRAWMAN. TN DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER HIM AND NEVER WILL! Third, | filed a QUO WARRANTO against the United States Inc. Foreign PEDO. corporation in 2020 as per proconfesso, Courts that fall under the United States Inc. are closed! Therefore, all courts that fall under the USA INC and the ROTHSCHILD should have dissolved themselves vs continue to violate due process and the 1990 ADA Act. Fourth, it is against your TN STATE BUSINESS CHARTER, Uniform Commercial Code (UCC INTERNATIONAL LAW), to continue this fraud, waste, abuse and crimes against AMOORICAN, Alll disputes must be settled peacefully in mediation vs in your for-profit courts (See Clearfield Doctrine) where AMOORICAN taxpayers money is wasted on your 18 USC 1341/BID BOND SCAM AND RICO ALSO SEE WESTFALL ACT and my QUO Warranto against the United States Inc. as | have proven several times that the USA INC COURT SYSTEM IS RIGGED FROM THE EEOC PROCESS IN DC TO THE SUPREME COURT.In addition, several of my defendants/lien holders have confessed! Also see the RED, WHITE, and BLUE FLAG with the yellow fringes which clearly state AMOORICANS are STRAWMEN while in COURT who have no rights, no constitution, and are tossed at sea aka 18 USC 1341 NAZI SCAM/RICO Fifth, we Americans with disabilities are protected under your 1990 AADA Act., 18 USC 241, 18 USC 242, 18 USC 245, 42 USC 1983 KKK, 42 USC 1985 and 42 USC 1986. We are paying you to do your job, not benefit from ANY AMOORICAN’s BID BONDS. (See BITCHUTE CHANNEL https://www.bitchute.com/video/2kGCo3ynmiBu/). | Margaret Sue Bozgoz, Indigenous Native Hawaiian/American with a soul. | am NOT a UNITED STATES INC FOREIGN PEDO CORPORATION CITIZEN. | make this statement under penalty of perjury. My ADA CLIENTS AND | are protected under 18 USC 245, TITLES II & Ill of the 1990 ADA Act (Man's law) and GOD’s Natural Law. = gifhf 7 fbf YA 7 Pee Margaret Sue Bozgoz, (7 Indigenous Native Hawalian/American with a soulREQUEST REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION Christopher Daniels | Margret S. Bozgoz indigenous American with a soul. | am NOT a corporation. My ADA Clients and | are protected under TITLES II & III of the 1990 ADA Act. We follow only 1 law which is GOD’s Natural law. | am in a conscious moral obligation to. not play man-made aka UNITED STATES INC FOREIGN PEDO CORPORATION games. | request this for-profit court, TN TO provide reasonable accommodation from this day forward to Christopher Daniles Reasonable Accommodation request: (1) The Public Defender to stop lying to Christopher Daniles about the 1990 ADA Act and how they don't recognize it or ADA Advocates which is a felony and ADA Interference. She should be in GITMO! (2) At the For-Profit Court’ Expense and as per the 1990 ADA Act, allow Margaret Bozgoz and Millie Daniels, ADA Advocates, to attend every fake Kangaroo court as this is a public interest case that needs to be televised. (3) Televised and RECORD all Christopher Daniles hearing for the entire world to see. (4) At the For-Profit Court’s Expense give Christopher Daniles his 8ID BOND Settlement to cash out. (8) CLOSE OUT his case from your USA INC FOR PROFIT CORPORATE RECORD THEN allow him to redeem his own BID BOND as everyone knows the illegal game the privately owned courts are playing! (6) Settle his case in mediation ASAP. $75,000 for the first ADA RA OFFENSE AND. $150,000 thereafter! (7) Turnover/arrest all District Court(DOD EMPLOYEES (e.g., CLERKS, JUDGES, ATTORNEYS, third party Contractors, Sheriff Officer who call MOORS BLACK). Black means dead! (8) Submit all Defendants/Lien Holders Health Hazard Bond information and Freeze their assets. (9) At the For-Profit Court’ Expenses make Christopher Daniles whole (10) At the court's Expense, hold everyone accountable and force them to step down as per 28 USC 3002 Section 884. (11) The Department of Defense honors your oath and Conduct an outside inspection. Specifically, find void orders. For each void order found in the Circuit Court in Coffee County, hold everyone involved 100 percent accountable for 18 USC 1341 Scam, 18 USC 241, 242, 245, 246, 249, 42 USC _,, 1983 KKK, 24 USC 1985 and 1906 violation as they are running a RICO SCAM! FY M. Sue Bozgoz ADA AdvocateBACKGROUND INFORMATION ON OTHER (BRADLEY’s) ADA CLIENTS AND REOCCURRING ISSUES WITH THE UNITED STATES INC COURTS: (1) God’s Natural Law (Exhibit, 1, God’s law vs man-made law). Note | am in conscious obligation to disobey all man-made law wishes are void. (2) 18 USC 1341, Fraud and Swindles, everything you sent [and failed] to send me is a fraud upon the court. (3) 18 USC 1343, Wire Fraud. At first glance of the altered docket, it's not only wire fraud, but also a felony, hence the reason we asked for your Public Hazard Information as we intend to freeze your assets and send you to GITMO (Exhibit 7, Public Hazard request with Affidavit). (4) 18 USC 241, Conspiracy against Rights which states If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured— They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. Note: | was not only kidnapped (like Luanne Simmons where they took her to their drug and alcohol facility illegally see: https://www. bitchute.com/channel/WTXWnbI8YhXG/ and https://www. bitchute.com/video/3FRGxT 1XwvPd/) by the Hillsborough Sheriff's which tells Americans they not only control the court system, jails, prisons, bid bonds, performance bonds, medical, VA, BAR, but the drug and alcohol facilities as well! To make matters worse, Judge Hernandez is a Jesuit (Exhibit 8, Jesuit Hernandez) while Judge Margaret Taylor is running a 3 billion corrupt court system (Exhibit 9, Judge Margaret Taylor's business) and Judge Michael Scionti is a Jag Commander who write void orders for the elderly as he steals ADA funds and denies ADA rights too!!! (Exhibit 10). This speaks volumes. to Americans, hence the reason we submitted an QUO WARRANTO to shut you down. As per pro confesso, your establishment is shut down and | am in conscious obligation to remind you of your crimes againsthumanity and your reoccurring TREASON (Exhibit 4, Quo Warranto with Affidavit) (6) 18 USC 242, 18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of aw which states: Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, wilfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, oF fire, shall be fined under this titte or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. | was kidnapped by the Hillsborough Sheriff's department and all my property was stolen on the record. (6) 18 USC 1983 KKK aka Charter of the FOREST. Civil action for deprivation of rights. Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. Relief is due, and | intend to get my relief hence the reason we asked to redeem my bid bonds and to make me whole again as per GOD's Universal law as man-made law can be changed when it conflicts GOD's law and as per 1990 ADA Act Titles Il and Titles Ill which states: (1) nobody gets immunity for violating my GOD given rights and (2) GOD’s law trumps man-made law all the time! (7) 18 USC 1985 42 U.S. Code § 1985 - Conspiracy to interfere with civil ‘ights which states:(a) Preventing officer [ADA ADVOCATE] from performing duties If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave any State, district, or place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties; (b) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to influence the verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, ‘obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws; (©) Depriving persons of rights or privileges If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; or if two or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is ‘ed in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or lege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived mayhave an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators. (8) 42 USC 1986, Action for Neglect to Prevent. Everyone involved is guilty. 18 USC 1001 said you either did it or you didn't, and hard evidence does not lie, the Judges, Prosecutors, Sheriff's Department in Hillsborough, Clerk’s Office, Third third-party contractors are not only involved they are guilty of neglecting to prevent crimes against humanity and (9) 18 USC Codes vs God’s Natural law. Treason is whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge [and attorneys, sheriff deputies, clerks and etc.), Are engaging in an act or acts of treason. US v Will, 449 US 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 Led 2d 392, 406 (1980). Cohens v. Virginal, 19 US US (6 Wheat). Any judge, attorney or DOD representative who does not report the above judges for treason as required By the United States Inc (CHARTER) laws/rules may themselves be guilty or misprision of treason, 18 USC Section 2382 (10) 18 U.S. § 2382 Misprision of treason. Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both. Misprision of treason is an offense found in many common law jurisdictions around the world, having been inherited from English law. It is committed by someone who knows treason is being or is about to be committed but does not report it to a proper authority. (11) 18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection. Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. Rebellion, uprising, or insurrection is a refusal of obedience or order. It refers. to the open resistance against the orders of established authority. (12) 18 USC 245, Federal Protected Activity. Can't intimidate, lie, and gaslight. Subsection (b)(2) of § 245, which is primarily enforced by theCriminal Section of the Civil Rights Division, makes it unlawful to willfully injure, intimidate or interfere with any person --or to attempt to do so ~ by force or threat of force, because of that other person's race, color, religion, or national origin. (13) 18 USC 249, Hate Crimes. In General.— (1) Offenses involving actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin —Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerous weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin of any person— (A) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and (B) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if— (i) death results from the offense; or (i) the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill (14) 42 U.S.C. § 3631 Criminal Interference with Right to Fair Housing. Section 3631 makes it unlawful for an individual to use force or threaten to use force to injure, intimidate, or interfere with, or attempt to injure, intimidate, or interfere with, any person's housing rights because of that person's race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin Among those housing rights enumerated in the statute are: 1) the sale, purchase, or rental of a dwelling, 2) the occupation of a dwelling, 3) the financing of a dwelling, 4) contracting or negotiating for any of the rights enumerated above, and 5) applying for or participating in any service, organizations, or facility relating to the sale or rental of dwellings. This statute also makes it unlawful to use force or threaten to use force to injure, intimidate, or interfere with any person who is assisting an individual or class of persons in the exercise of their housing rights. A violation of the statute is a misdemeanor unless prosecutors prove one of the statutory aggravating factors such as a bodily injury, use of a dangerous weapon, kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, death resulting, or attempt to kill, in which case there are graduated penalties up to and including life in prison. (15) 18 U.S.C. § 1581 ~ Peonage. Section 1581 prohibits holding or returning a person to a condition of peonage or arresting a person with the intent to place or return him into a condition of peonage (See BID BOND SCHEME, first arrest and illegally falsely ordering me back to fake kangaroo court in violation of my due process rights, safeguards, 1990 ADA Act rights and ADA interference rights. See:https://www.bitchute.com/video/3FRGxT1XwvPd/, GOD's Natural Law, Exhibit 1, the Charter of the FOREST and Exhibit 10, Bid bond/Scam against Americans by the BAR, Justice System, Judges, Prosecutors, Attorneys, Sheriff's Departments, Clerks, United States Inc PEDO Corporation and Corporations. Peonage is defined as compelling someone to work against their will for payment of a debt. In their (UNITED STATES INC, BAR, JUSTICE SYSTEM, ATTORNEYS, JUDGES, MAFIA etc.) BID BOND scheme, STATES around America are the Creditors and the VICTIM (AMERICAN) is the slave/Debtor (See Shaunel Burt and the 60 other Women in WA States Docket as none of them [like me have had a trial). Again, like my Docket have been altered in violation of 18 USC 1512 and 18 USC 1506. Compulsion must be through force, the threat of force, physical restraint, or abuse or threatened abuse of law (imprisonment). Section 1581 also prohibits obstructing, attempting to obstruct, interfering with, or preventing enforcement of the above statute The offense is a felony punishable by up to 20 years imprisonment, or up to life if the violation involves a statutory aggravating factor such as death resulting from the offense, kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill. Sixth, the hard evidence in this video shows the Hillsborough Sheriffs Department breaking into my house without a warrant. | repeat without a warrant. Instead of punishing the Hillsborough sheriff's department, the System [Judges, Prosecutors, Sheriff's Department etc. did the following: (a) Ignored my GOD-given nature rights as a man (b) Ignored the ADA Act (©) Ignored my ADA Advocate (d) Ignored my due process rights (€) Ignored my safety. (f) Ignored the fact that my ADA Advocate asked the Court to settle my bid bond and close out the case to prevent further harm and crimes against humanity (g) Ignored the fact that | asked for your company’s Public Health Hazard Bond Information (h) Ignored the fact that you are nothing, but a foreign corporation designed to harm Americans using American tax dollars in violation of GOD’s Natural Law () Step down as per your CHARTER @) Ignore the fact that | have a moral obligation to ignore nonsense aka cult members. Ref: Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Sufficiency of Pleading: | have been running in and out of FAKE KANGRAOO COURT SINCE 29 Oct 2022. Everyone following this caseincluding the Department of Defense knows for a judge to have authority over the case, sufficiency of a pleading must be established. If sufficiency of pleading is not established, the judge must dismiss the case vs. issue void order until | give in to their corruption. We Americans know your scam. As of date, | have not consented to play the United States Inc's games as everyone knows including the judges that the United States Inc is a Foreign Corporation that colludes with other associations/corporations to deny Americans of their GOD GIVEN RIGHTS. You also know that the corporations [including the courts] fall under contract law. Under contract law, any deception makes all orders void from the start. Also, see GOD's natural law (Exhibit 1), Under the United States Inc Foreign Corporation's Supreme Court Decision (MAN MADE LAW), “ALL codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities aka UNITED STATES INC FOREIGN CITIZENS only not for humans with a soul by GOD's Laws (Exhibit 1) All UNITED STATES INC FOREIGN CORPORATION rules and regulations are UNCONSTITUTIONAL and deny GOD's NATURAL LAW which means it lacks DUE PROCESS... [Rodriques v Ray Donavan (U.S. Department of Labor) 769 F.2d 1344, 1348(1985). The bottom line the rules that the United States Inc and the courts produce are not laws but rules for their FOREIGN PEDO CORPORATION See Also Exhibit 1, GOD's natural law. Also to be convicted under a statute, Americans are deceived [UNKNOWINGLY] into giving up their right by consenting thereby tricked into giving up their GOD GIVEN NATURAL RIGHTS which makes everything the United States Inc. produces Forever void from the start. As stated above, America's jails, prisons, and courts are filled with innocent Americans because of the United States Inc.'s crimes against humanity, greed, and BONDS. For the record, | do not plan to ever consent to your UNITED STATES INC's CORPORATION feud and games as | have been illegally jailed for something the UNITED STATES INC’s subcontractor, Hillsborough sheriff's department did. They entered my house illegally and without a warrant and they will be held accountable as per GOD's law, See Exhibit 1 As it pertains to my fake Kangaroo Court past and future. It is a felony to continue the scam Furthermore, and for the record, (1) the prosecutors in the 13 Circuit Court testified for the absent plaintiffs who were not in court. Everyone knows attorneys lie and cannot testify.Ref: my second Kangaroo Court on 4 Nov 2022 while | was awaiting my hearing at the VA, the VA prosecutor lied on the record and said | was at an “event/fair" vs court. She dismissed me from my hearing vs Judge Williams. The VA prosecutor also refused to let me see the judges after the VA bailiff called my name. | feel this was another setup by the system because the VA could not establish the sufficiency of pleading which is required for the judge to have jurisdiction over the case. Also, the docket has been altered and it shows me as a no-show! Below are the rules you don't follow: + The law places the duty and burden of subject-matter jurisdiction upon the plaintiff. Should the court attempt to place the burden upon the defendant, the court has acted against the law, violates the defendant's due process rights, and the judge under court decisions has immediately lost subject-matter jurisdiction + Bindell v City of Harvey, 212 Il App.3d 1042, 571 N.E.2d 1017 (1st Dist. 1991) (‘the burden of proving jurisdiction rests upon the party asserting it.”). "Until the plaintiff submits uncontroversial evidence of subject-matter jurisdiction to the court that the court has subject-matter jurisdiction, the court is proceeding without subject-matter jurisdiction.” Loos v American Energy Savers, Inc., 168 lll App.3d 558, 522 N.E.2d 841(1988) ("Where jurisdiction is contested, the burden of establishing it rests upon the plaintiff”), SUFFICIENCY OF PLEADING + Jurisdiction (Personal and Subject Matter Jurisdiction) is not just important it is everything and Is rarely properly. Jurisdiction may be broken down into two categories: personal lurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction is the requirement that a given court have power over the defendant, based on minimum contacts with the forum Subject-matter jurisdiction is the requirement that a given court have power to hear the specific kind of claim that is brought to that court. * Jurisdiction may be broken down into two categories: personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction is the requirement that a given court have power over the defendant, based on minimum contacts with the forum. Subject-matter jurisdiction is the requirement that a given court have power to hear the specific kind of claim that is brought to that court. While litigating parties may waive personal jurisdiction, they cannot waive subject-matter jurisdiction. in federal court, under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is considered a favored defense and may be raised at any point in the litigation process, even if the parties had previously argued that subject-matter jurisdiction existed. + A civil suit is a table with four legs: two opposing parties (2 legs), Subject Matter Jurisdiction (1 leg), and a Competent Fact Witness (1 leg). If anyone of the Legs is missing, the pleading fails to make the prima facie case. + The Judge must establish SMJ first. When they don't, they issue void orders. + Ejhoitj “The law provides that once State and Federal jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven.” See Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980). “Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven.” See Hagens v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 533.“Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather, should dismiss the action." See Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026. “Jurisdiction, once challenged, is to be proven, not by the court, but by the party attempting to assert jurisdiction, The burden of proof of jurisdiction lies with the asserter.” See McNutt v. GMAC, 298 US 178. The origins of this doctrine of law ‘may be found in Maxfield’s Lessee v. Levy, 4 US 308. “Where a court failed to observe safeguards, it amounts to a denial of due process of law, the court is deprived of juris.” See Merrit v. Hunter, C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739. “Jurisdiction is fundamental, and a judgment rendered by a court that does not have Jurisdiction to hear is void ab initio.” See In Re Application of Wyatt, 300 P. 132; Re Cavitt, 118 P2d 846. The law places the duty and burden of subject-matter jurisdiction upon the plaintiff, Should the court attempt to place the burden upon the defendant, the court has acted against the law, violates the defendant's due process rights, and the judge under court decisions has immediately lost subject-matter jurisdiction. Until the plaintiff submits uncontroversial evidence of subject-matter jurisdiction to the court that the court has subject-matter jurisdiction, the court is proceeding without subject-matter jurisdiction. Loos v American Energy Savers, Inc., 168 IlApp.3d 958, 522 N.E.2d 841(1988) ("Where jurisdiction is contested, the burden of establishing it rests upon the plaintif.”) In fact, the court may dismiss a case sua sponte (on its own) for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(1). The jurisdiction over the subject matter is the right of the court to exercise judicial power over that class of cases, and is said to be essential, necessary, indispensable and an elementary prerequisite to the exercise of judicial power. US v Cotton, 535 US 625 (2002); Joy v Two-Bit Corp., 287 Mich 244; 283 NW2d 45 (1938); Prosecuting Attorney for Ingham County v American Amusement Co. Inc., 71 Mich App 130; 246 NWe2d 684 (1976), cf, 21 CJS *Courts’ § 18, p, 25. Without such jurisdiction existing, an order entered by the court is absolutely void. In re Matter of Hague, 412 Mich 532, 544; 315 NW2d 524 (1982). Therefore, a defense based upon the lack of jurisdiction cannot be waived and may be asserted at any time. Menna v New York, 423 US 61, 62-63 (1975) (citing People v Carpentier, 446 Mich 19; 521 NW2d 195 (1994) cf, Fox v Board of Regent of Michigan University, 375 Mich 238, 242; 134 NW2d 146 (1965). In a court of limited jurisdiction, whenever a party denies that the court has subject- matter jurisdiction, it becomes the duty and the burden of the party claiming that the court has subject matter jurisdiction to provide evidence from the record Of the case that the court holds subject-matter jurisdiction. Bindell v City of Harvey, 212 Ill App.3d 1042, 571 N.E.2d 1017 (1st Dist. 1991) (“the burden of proving jurisdiction rests upon the party asserting it.") “Jurisdiction, once challenged, is to be proven, not by the court, but by the party attempting to assert jurisdiction. The burden of proof of jurisdiction lies with theasserter.” See McNutt v. GMAC, 298 US 178. The origins of this doctrine of law may be found in Maxfield’s Lessee v. Levy, 4 US 308. + ‘Where a court failed to observe safeguards, it amounts to a denial of due process of aw, the court is deprived of juris.” See Merritt v. Hunter, C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739. + ‘Jurisdiction is fundamental, and a judgment rendered by a court that does not have jurisdiction to hear is void ab initio.” See In Re Application of Wyatt, 300 P. 132; Re Cavitt, 118 P2d 846, + The law places the duty and burden of subject-matter jurisdiction upon the plaintiff. Should the court attempt to place the burden upon the defendant, the court has acted against the law, violates the defendant's due process rights, and the judge under court decisions has immediately lost subject-matter jurisdiction. + Until the plaintiff submits uncontroversial evidence of subject-matter jurisdiction to the court that the court has subject-matter jurisdiction, the court is proceeding without subject-matter jurisdiction. Loos v American Eneray Savers, Inc., 168 lll, App.3d 558, 522 N.E.2d 841(1988) (“Where jurisdiction is contested, the burden of establishing it rests upon the plaintiff.’ + In fact, the court may dismiss a case sua sponte (on its own) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(1). The jurisdiction over the subject-matter is the right of the court to exercise judicial power over that class of cases and is said to be essential, necessary, indispensable and an elementary prerequisite to the exercise of judicial power. US v Cotton, 535 US 625 (2002); Joy v Two-Bit Corp., 267 Mich 244; 283 NW2d 45 (1938); Prosecuting Attomey for Ingham County v American Amusement Co. Inc, 71 Mich App 130; 246 NW2d 684 (1976), cf, 21 CJS “Courts” § 18, p, 28. + Without such jurisdiction existing, an order entered by the court is absolutely void. In re Matter of Hague, 412 Mich 532, 544; 315 NW2d 524 (1982). Therefore, a defense based upon the lack of jurisdiction cannot be waived and may be asserted at any time. Menna v New York, 423 US 61, 62-63 (1975) (citing People v Carpentier, 446 Mich 19; 521 NW2d 195 (1994) cf, Fox v Board of Regent of Michigan University, 375 Mich 238, 242; 134 NW2d 146 (1968). + Ina court of limited jurisdiction, whenever a party denies that the court has subject-matter jurisdiction, it becomes the duty and the burden of the party claiming that the court has. subject-matter jurisdiction to provide evidence from the record of the case that the court holds subject-matter jurisdiction. Bindell v City of Harvey, 212 Il App.3d 1042, 571 N.E.2d 1017 (1st Dist. 1991) ("the burden of proving jurisdiction rests upon the party asserting it”. Ref: My initial Kangaroo Court with Judge Margaret Taylor, although the prosecutor gave me two guilty plea options which included (1) the State receiving relief illegally ($3,000) or me turning myself into their for-profit mental facility which means I will never come out, | said no as | did nothing wrong. It is the system that is the criminals. Hence the reason it is a crime to not settle in ion and to go into a for profit court room.Furthermore, on or about 29 November 2022 during our fake Kangaroo Court, with Judge Margaret Taylor she did the following against the WESTFALL ACT: (1) Denied reasonable accommodations as | asked for my ADA Advocate due to my TBI. | was denied. (2) | also learned that “SOME JUDGE" Issued a Cease and desist order to my ADA Advocate. This Judge could have only been Judge Margaret Taylor as all the Judges are involved in these crimes against humanity. Hence the reason my ADA Advocate was forced to add the Hillsborough Sheriff's Department to our Quo Warranto is the United States Inc. corporations are stealing ADA funds and denying ADA rights which is another crime against humanity. (3) BLUF: The Second any of the United States Inc. employees, violate my GOD GIVEN HUMAN RIGHTS, THEY NO LONGER BECOME A LEADER. They know they must step down. + My concerns are fraud, waste, and abuse continue although my ADA Advocate informed (1) this COURT, (2) the Department of Defense. The proof is: THIS INFORMATION IS ON THE RECORD as per the Federal Records Act and TITLES II and Ill of the 1990 Act see: http://www. bitchute.com/channelWTXWnbI8YhXG/ + This is significant to know because everyone has the facts on the RECORD BEFORE MY KANGAROO COURT DATE 31 Oct 2022 and 4 Nov 2022 + See hitps:/www.bitchute.com/channelWTXWnbI8YhXGy/ If this is a fact, the State, Veterans Head Quarters, the Hillsborough Prosecutors, Judges etc. should know that “No sanctions can be imposed absent proof of jurisdiction. + "See Standard v. Olsen, 74 S. Ct. 768; Title 5 U.S.C., Sec. 556 and 558 (b). “The proponent of the rule has the burden of proof.” Title 5 U.S.C., Sec. 556 (d). “Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time, even on final determination.” See Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 2nd 906 at 910. Hence the reason | feel the system is a scam aka 18 USC 1341 Because I did not take the guilty plea, Judge Margaret Taylor failed to establish sufficiency of pleading and without authority issued a void order/command. Her order [which she, Judge Williams], the VA prosecutors, and the Tampa Prosecutors] know is void, required me to return to Kangaroo Court on 29 Nov 2022 otherwise they would use the Sheriff to put me in their real jail (See BID BOND) Judge Taylor also announced in open court that I would not be having a jury trial which meant to me and the world that, TEASON was happening and once again, the SYSTEM (e.g., Judge and the Prosecutors, VA Attorneys, VA Judges) were gaslighting and violating my GOD GIVEN NATURAL RIGHTS AGAIN.IT IS AMATTER OF LAW THAT THEY FOLLOW THE LAW. Due Process is a requirement of the US Constitution Inc. AKA GOD'S NATURAL LAW WHICH NO MAN, WOMEN, OR CULT MEMBER CAN VIOLATE. Violation of the United States Inc.’s Constitution [Man Made rules] by a judge deprives that person [Judge Margaret Taylor, Judge Michael Williams, Judge Jeffery Rich, and Hernandez] from acting as a judge under GOD's Natural law. Also, when these Judges get together and violate GOD's Natural Law, He/She is acting as a private person [who is committing TREASON UPON THE COURTIAMERICAN PEOPLE and the military must step in hence the reason we are ccing DOD as they have a service contract which they cannot ignore as per the Department of Defense manual chapter 11 The Judges in the Judges System are not really Judges but Criminals controlled by the mafia. Everyone awoke knows their dirty little BID BOND secret. | suggest that you not only recuse yourselves but turn yourselves in already. Indigenous American PROSE JIORIGINAL SIGNED//DECLARATION OF BRADLEY EVERETTE BOLDEN | Bradley Everette Bolden, Indigenous American with a soul. | am NOT a corporation. | am protected under TITLES II & III of the 1990 ADA Act (Man's law) and GOD's Natural Law (SEE EXHIBIT 1). Also please note that Everyone knows that the United States Inc. is a Foreign Corporation that falls under contract law and uses the Court, Jail, and Prison system to benefit themselves through the BOND System which is an 18 USC 1341 ScamVRICO. Everyone also knows that All Corporations in America fall under Contract law which means, any deception makes all orders void. Therefore it is against the law to continue to play Kangaroo Court and abuse your fake authority. Under the United States Inc Foreign Corporation's Supreme Court Decision, “ALL codes, ules, and regulations are for government authorities aka UNITED STATES INC FOREIGN CITIZENS only, not for humans with a soul in accordance with GOD's Laws (See Exhibit 1). All UNITED STATES INC FOREIGN CORPORATION rules and regulations are UNCONSTITUTIONAL and deny GOD'’s NATURAL LAW which means it lacks DUE PROCESS... [Rodriques v Ray Donavan (U.S. Department of Labor) 769 F.2d 1344, 1348(1985), ‘The bottom line the rules that the United States Inc. produces are not laws but rules for their FOREIGN PEDO CORPORATION. To be convicted under a statute, Americans are deceived [UNKNOWINGLY] into giving their consent thereby tricked into giving up their GOD-GIVEN NATURAL RIGHTS which makes everything the United States Inc produces Forever void see also GOD's law (EXHIBIT 1), America's jails are filled with innocent Americans because of the United States Inc's crimes against humanity and greed (See BID BOND). Under Man Made law of the 1990 ADA Act, Title Il means nobody gets immunity for playing administrative trickery and TITLE IIl means man-made rules aka THE UNITED STATED INC CORPORATION RULES can be changed on the spot if it conflicts which GOD GIVEN NATURAL RIGHTs as nobody is above GOD. On or about 23 Feb 2023, my ADA Advocate asked the court to settle my BID BOND and close out my Kangaroo court case and to stop the harm as we know the courts, United States Justice Scam. | also know that | am due a settlement from the State of FL, Court System, and all the Defendant who violated my GOD-given rights.Furthermore, | understand it is against the law to continue to play games as it causes legal abuse syndrome which is a crime that my defendants must be held accountable. | also know that it is a crime to continue to waste time energy and American taxpayer money to continue to go to court without settling in mediation. | am due relief and | simply want relief as relief is due hence the reason, we dissolved the courts via QUO WARRANTO and Affidavits and we asked for the Defendant's Health Hazard Bonding Information as it is against the law not to stop the nonsense and crimes against Americans, humanity, and Indigenous people with a soul. | declare under penalty of perjury that the following/attached is true to the best of my ability. | am not a corporation and | do not consent to play any United States Inc Administrative Trickery Games. | am a man with a spirt and | am in conscious obligation to stop the man-made games. Bradley Everette Bolden Indigenous American PRO SE HORGINAL SIGNED/!