Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Devastating Floods in Western Europe - EUMETSAT
Devastating Floods in Western Europe - EUMETSAT
Satellites
Meteosat-11, Metop
Instruments
Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (CNR-ISAC)), Peter Krahe (Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde, Federal Institute
of Hydrology, Germany), David Fairbairn (ECMWF), Pierre Baguis (RMI), Francesco Zauli (HSAF/Centro Operativo
per la Meteorologia, Operational Center for Meteorology (Italian Air Force)), Natasa Strelec Mahovic, Christine
Traeger Chatterjee (EUMETSAT) and Ivan Smiljanic (CGI)
A slow-moving upper-level low, that resided over western Europe for several days, caused very heavy, long lasting
rainfall on the already moist soil, resulting in catastrophic floods in western parts of Germany and eastern parts of
Belgium, and to a lesser extent, parts of the Netherlands, France, Luxembourg and Switzerland.
First, a series of precipitation events from 6-12 July led to a large accumulation of rainfall in Switzerland, eastern
parts of France and south west Germany. Subsequently, over the following two days, 13-15 July, a slow moving low
pressure system, passing over the south sast France towards central and southern parts of Germany, led to very
heavy, long lasting rainfall events in western parts of Germany and in the border regions of France, Luxembourg,
Belgium and the Netherlands (Figure 1). This resulted in flooding of urban areas next to small and medium rivers,
with catastrophic consequences. The floods destroyed towns and villages in Germany and Belgium, causing more
than 180 casualties and large material damage. Some large cities, such as Cologne and Düsseldorf, were also
affected by the flooding.
0:00 / 0:23
Figure 1: Meteosat-11 Airmass RGB overlaid with Precipitation rate at ground from
geostationary IR channels supported by microwave channels from polar orbiting
satellites (HSAF H03B product), 11 July 12:00 UTC-16 July 06:00 UTC.
Storms that cause floods occur in western Europe relatively frequently, however, the storm on 14-15 July was
particularly devastating. The reason was the slow-moving nature of the storm, that caused a much more
concentrated accumulation of rainfall over the affected area than it would have if the storm had been moving faster.
Such intensive storms and prolonged rain episodes, with excessive precipitation, are becoming more likely with
changing climate.
At EUMETSAT it is part of our mission to support the weather services, who observe and forecast such storms, and
the emergency services who support the response and recovery. Our hearts go out to all those affected by this
catastrophic event.
Synoptic overview
The animation of the Meteosat-11 Airmass RGB overlaid with Absolute Topography at 500 hPa level isolines, shows
the movement of an upper-level low that formed within the large low-pressure centre over the North Atlantic (Figure
2). In the days preceding the heavy precipitation episode there was already an upper-level low passing over the same
area bringing precipitation (10-11 July). At that time the ULL that formed over the Atlantic was passing south of
Ireland, still moving rather fast.
0:00 / 0:26
The appearance in the Aimass RGB on 11-12 July indicates strong forcing from the upper troposphere, which can be
seen in red shades in the centre of the cut-off low. The red colour in the Airmass RGB comes from dry, potential
vorticity-rich air, descending from the upper troposphere or lower stratosphere and supporting cyclogenesis, thus
deepening the system.
At the leading side of the trough, within the frontal zone, warm and moist air was advected with strong south west
stream, first from the Atlantic and later from the warm Mediterranean. Once the cut-off low reached France it was
'blocked' by a high-pressure area over Eastern Europe on one side and a large high pressure area over the central
Atlantic on the other (Figure 3). This blocking situation slowed down the progression of the storm, resulting in
intense rainfall falling persistently over the same area.
Figure 3: Surface analysis with fronts, 14 July 00:00 UTC. Credit: DWD
Figure 4: Precipitation sums based on radar data - 72 Figure 5: Precipitation sums based on radar data - 72
hours (left) and 24 hours (right) accumulations for hours (left) and 24 hours (right) accumulations for
Germany, 12-14 July. Credit: DWD. Germany's flooded area, 12-14 July. Source DWD.
Figure 6: Maximum 24 hour precipitation amounts for Belgium, 14 July-15 July 06:00 UTC. Credit:
RMI
The precipitation estimated from the satellite measurements can be seen in the H SAF precipitation products in
Figures 7 and 8. Figure 7 shows a loop of six-hourly rainfall for the period from 12 to 15 July, and Figure 8 shows the
accumulated precipitation in the same period.
0:00 / 0:16
Figure 7: H SAF product H67 showing 6-hourly rainfall (mm/6 hrs), 12-15 July.
0:00 / 0:16
Microwave-derived satellite precipitation product from H SAF has been able to correctly identify the areas most
affected with amounts very close to ground observations. Figure 9 shows the comparison of the accumulated
rainfall from satellite data (H SAF H67 product) and accumulate rain gauge measurements for the period 13-15 July
2021.
The impact of precipitation in terms of flooding have been catastrophic, with flooding over all the rivers at the border
between Germany, Luxembourg and Belgium, e.g. the river Ourthe at the border between Belgium and Luxembourg)
and the river Sauer on the border between Luxembourg and Germany.
Hydrological summary
Prior to the period of rainfall connected to this storm, there were several episodes of heavy rain in the previous days,
so the soil was already very moist, near saturation in many areas. The top metre of soil was completely saturated, or
well above field capacity,after the intense rain occurred from the beginning of July in Belgium, Netherlands,
Luxembourg and Germany, as shown in root-zone soil moisture products - Soil Wetness Index (Figure 10) and the
anomalies of Soil Wetness Index in the root zone (Figure 11). In the flooding areas the soil wetness index shows
value between 0.5 and close to 1 (fully saturated), the red dots are the flooded areas in Germany.
Figure 10: Soil wetness index in the root zone (28-100 cm depth), H SAF H14 product for Europe (left) and
Germany (right), 14 July (ASCAT soil moisture measurements assimilated in the H-TESSEL land model). Credit:
David Fairbairn (H SAF, ECMWF).
Figure 11: Anomaly of Soil Wetness Index in the root zone (0-100 cm depth): Soil Wetness Index on 14 July (day
prior to main event) - Average July Soil Wetness Index for the years 1992-2020 for Europe (left) and Germany
(right). Credit: David Fairbairn (H SAF, ECMWF).
The anomalies of the H SAF Soil Wetness Index in the root zone H14 (SM-DAS-2) for the integrated root-zone layer
(0-100 cm depth) showed very wet conditions in the flooded regions (10-30% above average) for 14 July. The
anomalies are calculated based on the multi-year July average of H141/H142 (1992-2020) as the reference period.
Looking at the soil moisture a few days before the flooding and on the day after the heaviest rainfall, it can be seen
that in the flooded areas the soil wetness index increased towards saturation between 10 and 15 July (Figure 12).
Figure 12: Soil wetness index in layer 3 (28-100 cm depth) over Europe, H SAF H14 product. In the flooded areas
the soil wetness index increases towards saturation between 10 July (left) and 15 July (right). Credit: David
Fairbairn (H SAF, ECMWF).
The soil layers at 28-100 cm depth and the integrated root zone soil moisture (RZSM) of 0-100 cm depth normally
have a memory of a few weeks, whereas the top layers have a short memory and will saturate quickly after intense
rain.
From 13 July the surface soil moisture estimate from the surface layer (0-2 cm) for the H08 product, depicts wet
conditions indicating the presence of rainfall events before the flooding incident. In the flooded regions the surface
soil moisture increased (SSM) towards saturation between the 13 and 15 July. (Figure 13).
Figure 13: Surface Soil Moisture (SSM) ASCAT based NRT products. Subset images of the downscaled surface
soil moisture product H08 at 1 km resolution, focused on the flooded areas. Credit: ZAMG.
The surface soil moisture estimate in the topmost soil layer (<5 cm) is given in degrees of saturation, ranging from
0% (dry) to 100% (wet). On 15 July in the flooded regions, which are displayed as the wettest soil conditions, the
SSM increases with value close to 100% (fully saturated). The very wet antecedent soil moisture conditions and the
significant precipitation amounts were key drivers of the catastrophic flood occurred on 14-15 July. As shown in
Figure 14, flooding occurred in areas in which significant precipitation fell in areas that were already significantly
saturated. Satellite products from H SAF have been able to monitor soil moisture and precipitation during the event,
thus being an important tool for performing hydrological analysis during flood events.
0:00 / 0:14
Fi 14 S il i li f ASCAT 1 17 J l l id i h i i i
Figure 14: Soil moisture anomalies from ASCAT, 1-17 July, overlaid with precipitation
product from H SAF.
Flood assessment
For detailed post event rapid mapping products and airborne overflight campaigns you may like to consult the
following resources:
Related content
Satellites map floods in western Europe (ESA)
Deadly Floods Surprise Europe (NASA Earth Observatory)
Hydro-climatological classification of heavy and continuous precipitation in parts of Germany in connection with
the low pressure area "Bernd" from 12 to 19 July 2021 (DWD, in German)
The Extent of Flooding in the Hardest-Hit Areas of Europe (New York Times)
Germany floods: Where are the worst-hit areas? (BBC News)