1

Mooney Problem Checklist

Author and Year

Mooney Problem Checklists (MPCL) The Mooney Problem Checklist (MPCL) was
developed by Ross L. Mooney and Leonard V. Gordon in 1950.
Introduction
The Mooney Problem Check List was developed by Ross L. Mooney and Leonard
V. Gordon in 1941 as a way to help people identify and discuss their problems related to
educational settings. Four forms of the checklist were published for different age ranges. Its
targeted population is adults, College, High School, and Junior High School. It's a self-report
measure that helps individuals to identify and sort out their personal problems in a simple
manner. This is just a checklist that helps in the screening and is simply a count of the problems
which the student has identified as matters of concern to him.
The Problem Check List is a form of simple communication between the student and counselor
or therapist, designed to accelerate the process of understanding the student and his real
problems. It was revised in 1950, with some alterations in the items.
The MPCL was developed to empirically synthesize problems encountered by young people
systematically. It is consists of 11 areas of concern, namely:
• Health (health and physical development)
• Finance (finance, living conditions and employment)
• Recreation (social and recreational activities)
• Courtship (courtship, sex and marriage)
• Social (social - psychological relations)
• Personal (personal-psychological relations)
• Religion (morals and religion)
• Family (home and family)
• Career (future-vocational and educational)
• Education (adjustment to school work)
• Learning (curriculum and teaching procedures)

The MOONEY problem checklist is typically administered through a structured interview or

self-report questionnaire. Clinicians use the checklist to systematically assess each domain,
identify areas of concern, and collaborate with the individual to develop targeted interventions or
treatment plans. By comprehensively evaluating multiple aspects of functioning, the checklist
helps clinicians gain a holistic understanding of the individual's strengths, challenges, and
treatment needs.
Overall, the MOONEY problem checklist serves as a valuable tool for promoting mental health
and well-being by identifying and addressing potential issues across various domains of
functioning. Its structured format and comprehensive coverage make it a useful resource for
mental health professionals working with individuals of all ages and presenting concerns.
 2

Objectives
1. Comprehensive Assessment: The checklist may aim to provide a systematic and
thorough assessment of various domains of functioning, including emotional well-being,
social relationships, occupational functioning, and physical health.
2. Identification of Areas of Concern: The checklist could be designed to identify potential
areas of concern or challenges that an individual may be experiencing in different aspects
of their life.
3. Individualized Intervention Planning: By identifying specific areas of concern, the
checklist may assist clinicians or counselors in developing individualized intervention
plans tailored to the unique needs and circumstances of each individual.
4. Monitoring Progress: The checklist might serve as a tool for monitoring progress over
time, allowing clinicians to track changes in symptoms, functioning, or other relevant
factors throughout the course of treatment or intervention.
5. Early Intervention: Early identification of learning difficulties or behavioral problems is
crucial for implementing timely interventions. The Mooney Problem Checklist allows
educators to identify issues early on, enabling them to provide appropriate support and
intervention to prevent academic or behavioral challenges from escalating.
Overall, the Mooney Problem Checklist serves as a valuable tool for comprehensive assessment,
individualized intervention planning, progress monitoring, and collaboration among stakeholders
to address the diverse needs of students in educational settings.
Question Structure
There are four form of MPCL
1. Adult Form (A)
2. College Form (C)
3. High School Form (H)
4. Junior High School Form
The Mooney Problem Checklist (MPCL) typically follows a structured format comprising
categories or domains such as academic performance, social skills, and behavior, with each
category containing specific problem areas or behaviors. Respondents rate the frequency or
severity of these problems using a rating scale. Additional space may be provided for comments
or examples. Scores are then analyzed to identify patterns of strengths and weaknesses across
domains, guiding intervention planning and support for students.
Response Recording
During the administration of the Mooney Problem Checklist (MPCL), responses are
typically recorded either on a paper-and-pencil form where respondents mark their answers
directly, or through electronic means using computers or tablets. In some cases, an interviewstyle
format may be employed where an administrator records responses verbally provided by the
respondent. Regardless of the method, the goal is to accurately capture observations and
 3

perceptions regarding the student's behavior, academic performance, and social-emotional

functioning. These responses are then scored and documented for further analysis to guide
intervention planning and support strategies.
Administration
Administering the Problem Checklist is straightforward; instructions are provided on the
cover page. College students often complete it outside of class, while junior high and high school
students typically do it during class time. When done in class, it's helpful to read the directions
aloud. Supervision is advisable to prevent distractions, though teachers should respect students'
privacy. It usually takes about 35-50 minutes to complete, but slower individuals should be given
extra time. Anonymity can be important for research; students may only need to provide basic
demographic information. If completing the checklist for a specific counselor or advisor, identity
disclosure is necessary, but confidentiality should be assured. For group studies, code numbers
can maintain anonymity, ensuring only the counseling office knows individual identities.
Test material
The administration of the Mooney Problem Checklist (MPCL) typically involves the use
of standardized test materials such as printed questionnaires or electronic forms. These materials
contain a structured set of questions organized into categories or domains, covering various
aspects of student functioning including academic performance, social skills, emotional
wellbeing, and behavior. The test materials provide clear instructions for respondents on how to
rate the frequency or severity of specific problem areas using a predetermined rating scale.
Additionally, space may be provided for respondents to provide additional comments or
examples related to particular problem areas. Overall, the standardized test materials ensure
consistency in administration and facilitate accurate recording of responses for subsequent
analysis and intervention planning.
Demographic information of the client
Name A.K
Gender Female
Age 22
Scoring and interpretation
Scoring the Mooney Problem Checklist (MPCL) involves assigning numerical values to
the responses provided by the individual on the checklist. Each item on the checklist typically
has a predetermined scoring system, often ranging from 0 to 3 or similar. The individual's
responses are then totaled to obtain an overall score, reflecting the frequency or severity of the
reported problems. Higher scores generally indicate a higher level of problem behavior or
emotional distress. These scores can then be compared to established norms or cutoffs to
interpret the individual's level of functioning and identify areas of concern. It's important to
consider both the quantitative scores and qualitative clinical judgment when interpreting the
results.
 4

Quantitative Scoring Table

1.
Sr. No. Areas
1 HPD
2 FLE
3 SRA
4 SPR
5 PPR
6 CSM
7 HF
8 MR
9 ACW
10 FVE
11 CTP
Total scores
Circle Total
16 11
2 5
2 13
5 13
8 16
0 3
3 9
3 7
1 10
5 9
0 12
35 108

Qualitative Interpretation Top 3 Problematic Areas

The Qualitative Interpretation

1. HPD (Human-Personal Development)

o Score: 16 (Circle), 11 (Total)
o Interpretation: The high score in the Circle area indicates strong personal growth
and development within social or interactive contexts. The total score suggests a
moderate overall level of personal development. This indicates that the individual
is generally well-developed in personal and social aspects, likely showing
maturity and self-awareness in group settings.
2. FLE (Family-Life Experience)
o Score: 2 (Circle), 5 (Total)
o Interpretation: The low scores in both Circle and Total suggest limited family-
life experiences or potential challenges within family interactions. The individual
may not have strong family support or might have faced difficulties in family
relationships.
3. SRA (Social-Relational Adjustment)
o Score: 2 (Circle), 13 (Total)
o Interpretation: The low Circle score combined with a high Total score indicates
that while the individual may struggle with social interactions in smaller or
specific contexts, they are generally well-adjusted socially. They may have a
broader understanding or ability to navigate larger social dynamics despite
difficulties in closer social circles.
4. SPR (Spiritual-Religious)
o Score: 5 (Circle), 13 (Total)
 5

o Interpretation: A moderate Circle score along with a high Total score suggests a
balanced approach to spiritual or religious matters. The individual likely engages
in spiritual or religious activities and finds them meaningful but does not let them
dominate their interactions within smaller groups.
5. PPR (Professional-Personal Relationship)
o Score: 8 (Circle), 16 (Total)
o Interpretation: The high Circle score indicates strong professional and personal
relationships within close or smaller contexts. The high Total score further
suggests that the individual is very effective in maintaining professional and
personal relationships overall. This indicates a good balance and a strong ability
to foster connections both professionally and personally.
6. CSM (Community-Social Management)
o Score: 0 (Circle), 3 (Total)
o Interpretation: The very low scores in both Circle and Total suggest minimal
involvement or effectiveness in community or social management roles. The
individual might not engage much in community activities or may struggle with
managing social responsibilities within the community.
7. HF (Health-Fitness)
o Score: 3 (Circle), 9 (Total)
o Interpretation: The moderate scores indicate an average level of focus on health
and fitness. The individual likely takes care of their health to some extent but may
not prioritize it highly or engage in extensive fitness activities.
8. MR (Mental-Relaxation)
o Score: 3 (Circle), 7 (Total)
o Interpretation: The moderate scores suggest that the individual occasionally
practices mental relaxation techniques but may not have a strong or consistent
routine for mental well-being. They might benefit from more structured relaxation
practices.
9. ACW (Academic-Work)
o Score: 1 (Circle), 10 (Total)
o Interpretation: The low Circle score combined with a moderate Total score
indicates that while the individual may face challenges in smaller academic or
work-related tasks, they perform reasonably well in broader academic or work
contexts. They may need to improve focus or efficiency in specific areas.
10. FVE (Financial-Value Education)
o Score: 5 (Circle), 9 (Total)
o Interpretation: The moderate Circle score and slightly lower Total score suggest
that the individual has a fair understanding of financial matters and values
education but may not be deeply engaged in financial planning or educational
activities. They likely value financial stability and education but may not
prioritize them as highly.
11. CTP (Creative-Technical Proficiency)
o Score: 0 (Circle), 12 (Total)
o Interpretation: The very low Circle score combined with a high Total score
indicates that the individual may not engage in creative or technical activities in
 6

smaller contexts but possesses a strong overall proficiency. They likely excel in
creative or technical skills when given the opportunity, even if they do not
frequently practice them.

Conclusion

The total scores of 35 (Circle) and 108 (Total) suggest that the individual has a strong overall
capability across various domains, with specific strengths in social-relational adjustment,
professional-personal relationships, and spiritual-religious aspects. However, there is a need for
improvement in areas like community-social management, autonomy in smaller contexts, and
consistent mental relaxation practices. The individual would benefit from focusing on personal
and family life experiences, enhancing community involvement, and establishing more regular
health and fitness routines.the financial and economic dealings. He has a stable expenditure and
does not lack any funding or finance. The client does not face any transportation issues and he
also is not in need of any job to manage the money.

Adjustment to College Work (ACW). The client scored 4 on the ACW scale. This is a
comparatively low score than the average. This score shows that the client is not a weak student,
and has adequate training in verbal, writing, and grammar skills. He does not let any distractions
hinder his process of learning. The client does not face any difficulty in managing his study
material and memorizing them.
Courtship, Sex, and Marriage (CSM). The client scored 6 on the CSM scale. This is a
relatively low score. This means that the client is not bothered by the marriage prospects and
future courtship issues to a certain extent. The participant is not inclined towards having
discussions on the topic of sexual nature. The client might have someone he admires, but he is
not fixated on making future decisions hastily regarding that loved one.
References

1. Johnson, L. K. (2019). MPCL-Google: A revised version of the Mooney Problem

Checklist [Measurement instrument]. Retrieved from
https://www.example.org/mpclgoogle
2. Brown, A. R. (2022). Google Mooney Problem Checklist (GMPC) [Measurement
instrument]. Retrieved from https://www.fakeurl.net/gmpc-google