i

Role of Narcistic traits in academic burnout among university student's

Student Name

Zaman Chaudhry

Noor Fatima

Ayesha Kainaat

Registration Number
BSPS-023R20-18

BS Psychology 8th Semester

Department Of Psychology

Institute Of Southern Punjab Multan

Chapter 1

Introduction
 2

In recent years, many academic crises among university students have received widespread

attention due to their negative impact on education and overall health. In this context, the role of

narcissistic traits has emerged as a potential influencing factor in the experience of burnout. The

purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between narcissistic behavior and academic

stress among college students and to understand the importance of understanding how the

behavior relates to higher education issues. By exploring this relationship, research attempts to

uncover mechanisms by which narcissistic behavior may increase or decrease academic stress.

These insights have important implications for designing intervention plans and supportive

strategies designed to improve student health and academic success. By fully evaluating these

variables, this study attempts to gain a broader understanding of the psychological factors that

influence students' University experiences..

Background of the Study

In recent years, there has been a growing concern about the prevalence of academic

burnout among university students worldwide. Academic burnout is characterized by feelings of

exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced academic efficacy (Schaufeli et al., 2002). It not only affects

students' mental and physical well-being but also detrimentally impacts their academic

performance and overall success in higher education (Dyrbye et al., 2010).

Simultaneously, researchers have begun to explore the role of personality traits in shaping

individuals' experiences and reactions to stressors, including those encountered within the

academic environment. One personality trait that has garnered significant attention in this regard is

narcissism. Narcissism is a multidimensional personality trait characterized by grandiosity,

entitlement, a constant need for admiration, and a lack of empathy (American Psychiatric

Association, 2013).
 3

Previous studies have examined the relationship between narcissism and various negative

outcomes in different contexts, such as interpersonal relationships, work environments, and

academic settings (Brunell et al., 2008; Coker et al., 2017). However, the specific association

between narcissistic traits and academic burnout among university students remains relatively

unexplored.

Understanding the potential link between narcissistic traits and academic burnout is crucial

for several reasons. Firstly, narcissistic individuals often exhibit maladaptive coping strategies and

difficulty in handling stressors (Besser & Priel, 2010). These tendencies may exacerbate the

experience of burnout when faced with the academic demands and pressures inherent in university

life. Secondly, narcissistic traits may influence how individuals perceive and respond to feedback,

criticism, and academic setbacks, which are common triggers for burnout (Zhang & Zyphur,

2015).

Moreover, studying the role of narcissism in academic burnout aligns with broader efforts

to enhance student well-being and academic success. By identifying individuals at risk of

experiencing burnout due to narcissistic tendencies, educators and mental health professionals can

develop targeted interventions and support mechanisms to mitigate the negative consequences and

promote resilience among students.

Given the potential significance of narcissistic traits in understanding academic burnout,

this research aims to investigate the relationship between narcissism and various dimensions of

academic burnout among university students.

In recent years, there has been a growing concern about the prevalence of academic

burnout among university students worldwide. Academic burnout is characterized by feelings of

exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced academic efficacy (Schaufeli et al., 2002). It not only affects

students' mental and physical well-being but also detrimentally impacts their academic

performance and overall success in higher education (Dyrbye et al., 2010).

 4

Simultaneously, researchers have begun to explore the role of personality traits in shaping

individuals' experiences and reactions to stressors, including those encountered within the

academic environment. One personality trait that has garnered significant attention in this regard is

narcissism. Narcissism is a multidimensional personality trait characterized by grandiosity,

entitlement, a constant need for admiration, and a lack of empathy (American Psychiatric

Association, 2013).

Previous studies have examined the relationship between narcissism and various negative

outcomes in different contexts, such as interpersonal relationships, work environments, and

academic settings (Brunell et al., 2008; Coker et al., 2017). However, the specific association

between narcissistic traits and academic burnout among university students remains relatively

unexplored.

Understanding the potential link between narcissistic traits and academic burnout is crucial

for several reasons. Firstly, narcissistic individuals often exhibit maladaptive coping strategies and

difficulty in handling stressors (Besser & Priel, 2010). These tendencies may exacerbate the

experience of burnout when faced with the academic demands and pressures inherent in university

life. Secondly, narcissistic traits may influence how individuals perceive and respond to feedback,

criticism, and academic setbacks, which are common triggers for burnout (Zhang & Zyphur,

2015).

Moreover, studying the role of narcissism in academic burnout aligns with broader efforts

to enhance student well-being and academic success. By identifying individuals at risk of

experiencing burnout due to narcissistic tendencies, educators and mental health professionals can

develop targeted interventions and support mechanisms to mitigate the negative consequences and

promote resilience among students.

 5

Given the potential significance of narcissistic traits in understanding academic burnout,

this research aims to investigate the relationship between narcissism and academic burnout among

university students.

In summary, this study seeks to contribute to the existing literature by elucidating the

complex interplay between narcissistic traits and academic burnout among university students. By

identifying the specific mechanisms through which narcissism influences the experience of

burnout, this research aims to inform the development of targeted interventions and support

services aimed at promoting student well-being and academic success in higher education.

To achieve the objectives of this study, we used validated measures such as the Narcissistic

Personality Inventory (NPI) (Raskin & Terry, 1988), while academic burnout will be measured

using established scales such as the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (MBI-SS)

(Schaufeli et al., 2002).

The NPI is utilized to measure narcissistic traits, capturing dimensions such as grandiosity,

entitlement, and admiration seeking. Participants will respond to a series of items assessing their

agreement with statements reflecting narcissistic tendencies, such as "I am superior to others" and

"I deserve special treatment." Scores on the NPI will provide quantitative indicators of

participants' levels of narcissism, which will then be analyzed in relation to scores on the MBI-SS

to explore the association between narcissistic traits and academic burnout.

The MBI-SS, a widely used instrument for assessing burnout in student populations,

comprises three subscales corresponding to the dimensions of burnout: exhaustion, cynicism, and

reduced academic efficacy. Participants will rate the frequency with which they experience

symptoms of burnout, such as feeling emotionally drained, detached from academic work, and

ineffective in their academic pursuits. Scores on each subscale will be computed to assess the

severity of burnout experienced by participants, allowing for a detailed examination of the

relationship between narcissism and specific dimensions of burnout..

 6

In summary, this research endeavors to shed light on the complex interplay between

narcissistic traits and academic burnout among university students. this study seeks to provide

valuable insights that can inform the development of targeted interventions and support services

aimed at promoting student well-being and academic success in higher education.

To ensure the reliability and validity of the findings, several methodological considerations

are implemented. Firstly, participants are recruited from diverse academic disciplines and

demographic backgrounds to enhance the generalizability of the results (Smith et al., 2018). We

target a large sample to increase statistical power and allow for subgroup analyses based on

relevant variables such as gender, age, and academic major (Creswell & Creswell, 2017).

Ethical guidelines for research involving human participants are strictly adhered to

throughout the study. Informed consent is obtained from all participants, and their confidentiality

and anonymity is secured (American Psychological Association, 2017). Participants are informed

of their right to withdraw from the study at any time without repercussions.

Qualitative data analysis follows a rigorous process of thematic coding, wherein transcripts

of the interviews are systematically coded and analyzed to identify emergent themes and patterns

(Braun & Clarke, 2019). The coding process is conducted independently by two researchers to

enhance the reliability of the findings, with discrepancies being resolved through discussion and

consensus.

Integration qualitative findings are achieved through a process of triangulation, whereby

convergent, complementary, or dissonant results from both data sources will be examined to

provide a comprehensive understanding of the research questions (Flick, 2018). This integrated

approach enables the identification of overarching themes and subthemes that elucidate the

interplay between narcissistic traits and academic burnout.

 7

The findings of this study have implications for both research and practice in the fields of

psychology, education, and student support services. By elucidating the mechanisms through

which narcissistic traits influence the experience of academic burnout, this research contributes to

theoretical advancements in understanding personality–stress interactions. Furthermore, the

identification of modifiable factors that mediate or moderate the relationship between narcissism

and burnout informs the development of targeted interventions aimed at mitigating the negative

effects of narcissistic tendencies on student well-being and academic success.

In conclusion, this study represents a comprehensive investigation into the role of

narcissistic traits in academic burnout among university students. By qualitative findings, this

research aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between personality

factors and student experiences in higher education

Problem Statement

Despite the growing recognition of the detrimental effects of academic burnout on

university students' well-being and academic success (Schaufeli et al., 2002), there remains a

significant gap in understanding the role of narcissistic traits in shaping the experience of

burnout in higher education settings. While narcissism has been extensively studied in various

contexts, including workplace environments and interpersonal relationships (Brunell et al.,

2008; Coker et al., 2017), its specific influence on academic burnout among university students

remains relatively unexplored.

Existing literature suggests that narcissistic individuals may be particularly vulnerable to

experiencing burnout due to their perfectionistic tendencies, high achievement orientation, and

difficulty in handling criticism or setbacks (Besser & Priel, 2010). However, empirical evidence

linking narcissistic traits to the dimensions of academic burnout—exhaustion, cynicism, and

reduced academic efficacy—remains limited and inconclusive.

 8

Moreover, studies that have examined the relationship between narcissism and burnout have

primarily focused on occupational settings rather than academic environments (O'Connor et al.,

2007; Wasti et al., 2008). The transferability of findings from these studies to the academic

domain is uncertain due to the unique stressors and dynamics inherent in educational settings.

This gap in knowledge poses significant implications for student well-being and academic

success. Understanding the mechanisms through which narcissism contributes to academic

burnout is crucial for developing targeted interventions and support services. By elucidating the

complex interplay between narcissistic traits and academic burnout, this research seeks to

address this gap and provide valuable insights for educators, mental health professionals, and

policymakers striving to promote student well-being and success in higher education.

Therefore, the problem statement of this research is to investigate the relationship between

narcissistic traits and academic burnout among university students, with the aim of understanding

how narcissism influences students' experiences of exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced academic

efficacy, and identifying factors that may mitigate or exacerbate the impact of narcissistic

tendencies on burnout outcomes.

Significance of the Study

The This study is important for the following reasons:

Contribution to the academic literature on burnout

This study, which investigates the role of negative attitudes in college student burnout,

contributes as a resource to the growing literature on academic burnout. Understanding how a

personality trait such as narcissism affects the experience of burnout can shed light on many

aspects of this phenomenon.

 9

Identifying students at risk

Findings from this study may help identify students who may be particularly vulnerable

to exposure to violence in education due to their negative thoughts. Such analyzes lead to early

intervention strategies to prevent or reduce the negative effects of burnout on student health and

academic achievement.

Conclusions

Information obtained from this study may inform the development of intervention plans

for students with disruptive behaviors. Risks of learning bias. By tailoring interventions to

individual characteristics, teachers and psychologists can maximize their effectiveness in

increasing student achievement and achievement.

Student support programs

Colleges and universities can use the results of this study to improve their student

support programs. By understanding the relationship between narcissistic behavior and academic

stress, schools can take important steps to develop a supportive learning environment and

motivate students to succeed.

Contributions to the understanding of psychology

This study also deepens the understanding of the relationship between negative attitudes and

academic stress, positive attitudes and mental health in the educational context. This research

expands our understanding of the interplay between self and environment in shaping student

experiences by illuminating how narcissistic influences influence academic burnout.

 10

Overall, the results of this study have the potential to inform research and education. Practices in

psychology, education, and student services that ultimately improve the psychology and learning

of college students.

Research Objectives

• To find out relationship between narcissistic traits and academic burnout among university
students.
• To find out the impact of Narcissistic traits in academic burnout among university student's
• To find out the Demographic differences ( gender ) in terms of Narcistic traits and academic
burnout

Research Question

• Is there a relationship between narcissistic traits and academic burnout among university
students.
• Is there an impact of Narcissistic traits in academic burnout among university students ?
• Is there some Demographic differences ( gender ) in terms of narcissistic traits and academic
burnout

Research Hypothesis:

• There would be a significant positive relationship between narcissistic traits and academic
burnout among university students.
• There would be a impact of Narcissistic traits in academic burnout among university
student's
• There would be a Demographic differences ( gender ) in terms of Narcistic traits and
academic burnout
 11

Literature Review

Academic burnout, characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced

personal accomplishment (Maslach & Jackson, 1981), has become a growing concern among

university students worldwide. Researchers have identified various factors contributing to

academic burnout, ranging from workload and academic pressure to personal characteristics and

psychological factors. One such psychological trait that has garnered attention in recent years is

narcissism.

Narcissism and its Manifestations

Narcissism, deriving its name from the Greek myth of Narcissus, embodies a

complex array of personality traits that have captivated researchers and clinicians for decades. It

is delineated in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) as Narcissistic

Personality Disorder (NPD), characterized by a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, a constant need

for admiration, and a lack of empathy, which typically begins in early adulthood and manifests

across various contexts (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

The grandiose sense of self-importance central to narcissism often manifests in exaggerated claims

of talents, accomplishments, or unique qualities. Narcissistic individuals frequently seek to portray

themselves as exceptional and superior to others, irrespective of actual achievements or abilities

(Twenge & Campbell, 2009). This inflated self-view not only fuels their sense of superiority but

also engenders expectations of special treatment and entitlement, leading them to believe they

deserve privileges and recognition that others do not (APA, 2013).

Furthermore, the relentless pursuit of admiration characterizes narcissistic individuals'

interpersonal interactions. They seek constant validation and approval from others to bolster their

fragile self-esteem and reinforce their desired self-image (Bushman & Baumeister, 1998). This

pursuit often drives them to engage in self-promotion tactics, such as boasting about

accomplishments or seeking out situations where they can be the center of attention (Twenge &
 12

Campbell, 2009). Consequently, they may struggle to form genuine connections with others, as

relationships become transactional, serving primarily as a means to fulfill their need for admiration

and validation.

The lack of empathy is another hallmark feature of narcissism, where individuals struggle to

recognize or relate to the emotions and experiences of others. This empathic deficit can manifest

in various ways, ranging from indifference to the suffering of others to outright exploitation of

interpersonal relationships for personal gain (Twenge & Campbell, 2009). Narcissistic individuals

often prioritize their own needs and desires over those of others, demonstrating a profound

disregard for the feelings and well-being of those around them (Bushman & Baumeister, 1998).

In summary, narcissism encompasses a multifaceted constellation of traits, including grandiosity,

entitlement, a constant need for admiration, and a lack of empathy. These manifestations of

narcissism profoundly influence individuals' interpersonal relationships, emotional well-being,

and behavioral tendencies, making it a critical area of study in understanding the dynamics of

human personality and behavior.

Narcissism in Educational Contexts

Narcissistic traits, though commonly associated with interpersonal dynamics, also

manifest prominently within educational environments, exerting notable influence on students'

academic experiences and outcomes. Within the realm of academia, narcissistic individuals often

exhibit behaviors and attitudes that reflect their overarching personality tendencies, thereby

impacting their interactions with peers, educators, and the learning process itself.

One prominent manifestation of narcissism in educational settings is the exhibition of grandiose

self-perceptions and aspirations. Narcissistic students may project an exaggerated sense of their

own abilities and achievements, positioning themselves as intellectually superior or uniquely

talented within the academic domain (Krizan & Johar, 2012). Consequently, they may seek

opportunities to showcase their perceived excellence, whether through academic performance,

 13

participation in class discussions, or leadership roles within student organizations (Twenge &

Campbell, 2009).

Moreover, the sense of entitlement intrinsic to narcissism often permeates academic contexts,

leading narcissistic students to expect preferential treatment and recognition from educators and

peers alike (Krizan & Johar, 2012). They may express dissatisfaction or frustration when their

expectations are not met, viewing academic pursuits as avenues for personal validation rather than

opportunities for growth and learning (Twenge & Campbell, 2009). This entitlement-driven

mindset can impede collaborative efforts and foster an environment of competition and

individualism, detracting from the collective learning experience.

Furthermore, narcissistic individuals' relentless pursuit of admiration and validation manifests

prominently within educational settings. They may engage in self-promotion tactics, such as

boasting about academic achievements or seeking out opportunities for public recognition, to

bolster their fragile self-esteem and maintain their desired self-image (Bergman et al., 2018). This

self-centered focus often detracts from genuine engagement with course material and

collaborative learning endeavors, as narcissistic students prioritize external validation over

intrinsic satisfaction and intellectual growth.

The lack of empathy characteristic of narcissism also has implications for students' interpersonal

relationships within educational contexts. Narcissistic individuals may struggle to empathize with

the perspectives and experiences of their peers, viewing interpersonal interactions primarily as

opportunities for self-aggrandizement or exploitation (Twenge & Campbell, 2009). Consequently,

they may exhibit behaviors that undermine collaboration and cooperation, such as manipulation,

deceit, or disregard for others' feelings and needs (Bushman & Baumeister, 1998).

In summary, narcissism permeates educational contexts in multifaceted ways, influencing

students' attitudes, behaviors, and interpersonal dynamics within academic environments.

 14

Recognizing the manifestations of narcissism in educational settings is essential for educators,

administrators, and mental health professionals to effectively support students' holistic

development and foster inclusive, collaborative learning environments.

Academic Burnout

Academic burnout represents a prevalent and multifaceted phenomenon within

educational settings, characterized by a state of physical, emotional, and mental exhaustion

resulting from prolonged exposure to academic stressors and demands (Maslach et al., 2001). It

encompasses three core dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced

personal accomplishment, each of which contributes to students' overall experiences of distress

and disengagement within academic contexts.

Emotional exhaustion, the primary component of academic burnout, refers to feelings of

overwhelming fatigue and depletion of emotional resources in response to chronic academic

stressors (Maslach et al., 2001). Students experiencing emotional exhaustion often report

persistent feelings of fatigue, irritability, and a sense of being emotionally drained, making it

challenging to sustain motivation and engagement in academic activities (Schaufeli et al., 2002).

This exhaustion may result from a myriad of factors, including heavy workloads, academic

pressure, and a lack of adequate coping resources, ultimately undermining students' well-being

and academic performance.

Depersonalization, the second dimension of academic burnout, entails a cynical or detached

attitude towards academic tasks, instructors, and peers (Maslach et al., 2001). Students

experiencing depersonalization may adopt a disengaged and apathetic stance towards their

academic responsibilities, viewing coursework and interactions with educators and peers as

burdensome or inconsequential (Schaufeli et al., 2002). This detachment can erode students' sense

of connectedness and belonging within the academic community, exacerbating feelings of

isolation and alienation.

 15

Reduced personal accomplishment, the final dimension of academic burnout, reflects students'

perceptions of inadequacy and ineffectiveness in their academic pursuits (Maslach et al., 2001).

Individuals experiencing reduced personal accomplishment may perceive their efforts as futile or

unsuccessful, regardless of their actual achievements or competencies (Schaufeli et al., 2002).

This pervasive sense of inefficacy can diminish students' self-esteem and motivation, perpetuating

a cycle of disengagement and academic underachievement.

The interplay of these three dimensions contributes to students' overall experiences of academic

burnout, impacting their psychological well-being, academic performance, and long-term

educational outcomes. Left unaddressed, academic burnout can have profound implications for

students' mental health, contributing to symptoms of anxiety, depression, and even dropout from

educational programs (Maslach et al., 2001).

In summary, academic burnout represents a complex and multifaceted phenomenon characterized

by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment. Recognizing

the signs and symptoms of burnout is essential for educators, administrators, and mental health

professionals to implement effective prevention and intervention strategies aimed at promoting

students' well-being and academic success.

The Relationship Between Narcissism and Academic Burnout

Understanding the intricate relationship between narcissistic traits and academic

burnout among university students is essential for elucidating the underlying mechanisms and

developing targeted interventions to mitigate the negative consequences associated with both

constructs. Research has increasingly focused on exploring the nuanced interplay between

narcissism and academic burnout, shedding light on the complex dynamics that contribute to

students' experiences of distress and disengagement within educational contexts.

Several studies have documented a positive association between narcissistic traits and various

components of academic burnout, including emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced

 16

personal accomplishment (Kaur & Sambasivan, 2018; Lee et al., 2020). Narcissistic individuals,

characterized by their grandiose self-perceptions and relentless pursuit of admiration, may be

particularly susceptible to experiencing burnout due to the inherent stressors and pressures

associated with maintaining their desired self-image and seeking external validation.

One potential mechanism underlying the relationship between narcissism and academic burnout

is the heightened sensitivity to failure and criticism among narcissistic individuals (Brummelman

et al., 2016). Narcissistic students, driven by their need for validation and admiration, may

perceive academic setbacks and challenges as threats to their self-esteem and identity, leading to

increased levels of stress and emotional exhaustion (Kaur & Sambasivan, 2018). Consequently,

they may adopt maladaptive coping strategies, such as avoidance or denial, which further

exacerbate feelings of burnout and undermine their academic performance.

Moreover, the interpersonal dynamics characteristic of narcissism may contribute to students'

experiences of burnout within educational settings. Narcissistic individuals, characterized by their

self-centered focus and lack of empathy, may struggle to form meaningful connections with peers

and educators, leading to feelings of isolation and alienation (Bushman & Baumeister, 1998). This

social disconnection can exacerbate students' experiences of burnout, as they lack the social

support and resources necessary to cope effectively with academic stressors.

Furthermore, the pursuit of perfectionism and achievement inherent to narcissism may fuel

students' experiences of burnout, as they strive to meet unrealistic standards and expectations

(Twenge & Campbell, 2009). Narcissistic individuals may engage in relentless self-criticism and

self-doubt when they perceive themselves as falling short of their own impossibly high standards,

leading to feelings of inadequacy and reduced personal accomplishment (Lee et al., 2020).

In summary, the relationship between narcissism and academic burnout is complex and

multifaceted, influenced by a myriad of individual, interpersonal, and contextual factors.

 17

Recognizing the interplay between narcissistic traits and burnout is essential for developing

targeted interventions aimed at promoting students' well-being and fostering a supportive and

inclusive academic environment conducive to learning and growth

Mechanisms Underlying the Relationship

Understanding the intricate mechanisms that underlie the relationship between

narcissistic traits and academic burnout is crucial for elucidating the complex interplay between

individual characteristics and environmental stressors within educational settings. Researchers

have identified several key mechanisms through which narcissism may contribute to students'

experiences of burnout, shedding light on the nuanced processes that shape students' psychological

well-being and academic functioning.

One fundamental mechanism underlying the relationship between narcissism and academic

burnout is the heightened vulnerability to stress and negative affect among narcissistic individuals

(Kaur & Sambasivan, 2018). Narcissistic students, characterized by their grandiose

selfperceptions and fragile self-esteem, may be particularly sensitive to academic stressors and

setbacks, perceiving them as threats to their self-image and identity (Twenge & Campbell, 2009).

Consequently, they may experience heightened levels of emotional exhaustion and psychological

distress, contributing to the onset and exacerbation of burnout symptoms.

Moreover, the perfectionistic tendencies inherent to narcissism may exacerbate students'

experiences of burnout by fostering unrealistic standards and expectations (Lee et al., 2020).

Narcissistic individuals, driven by their need for perfection and achievement, may adopt a

relentless pursuit of academic success, often at the expense of their well-being and mental health

(Twenge & Campbell, 2009). This perfectionistic mindset can fuel feelings of inadequacy and

self-doubt, perpetuating a cycle of stress and burnout within educational contexts.

Additionally, the interpersonal dynamics characteristic of narcissism may contribute to students'

experiences of burnout by undermining social support and cohesion within academic

 18

environments (Bushman & Baumeister, 1998). Narcissistic individuals, characterized by their

self-centered focus and lack of empathy, may struggle to form meaningful connections with peers

and educators, leading to feelings of social isolation and alienation (Twenge & Campbell, 2009).

This social disconnection can exacerbate students' experiences of burnout, as they lack the

relational resources necessary to cope effectively with academic stressors and challenges.

Furthermore, the maladaptive coping strategies adopted by narcissistic individuals may perpetuate

and exacerbate burnout symptoms over time (Kaur & Sambasivan, 2018). Narcissistic students,

confronted with academic stressors and setbacks, may resort to avoidance or denial as coping

mechanisms, rather than seeking out adaptive solutions or social support (Twenge & Campbell,

2009). This avoidance-based coping style can prolong students' experiences of burnout, as they

fail to address the underlying sources of stress and distress within their academic lives.

In summary, the mechanisms underlying the relationship between narcissistic traits and academic

burnout are multifaceted and dynamic, encompassing individual, interpersonal, and contextual

factors. Recognizing these mechanisms is essential for developing targeted interventions aimed at

promoting students' psychological well-being and resilience within educational settings.

Implications for Intervention

Understanding the implications of the relationship between narcissistic traits and

academic burnout among university students is crucial for informing the development and

implementation of effective interventions aimed at promoting students' well-being and academic

success. Researchers and practitioners alike have emphasized the importance of adopting a

multifaceted approach to intervention, addressing both individual-level factors and broader

contextual influences within educational settings.

One key implication for intervention is the importance of early identification and screening of

students at risk for experiencing academic burnout due to narcissistic traits (Bergman et al., 2018).

By recognizing the signs and symptoms of narcissism and burnout among students, educators and
 19

mental health professionals can implement targeted screening measures and assessment tools to

identify individuals in need of support and intervention (Twenge & Campbell, 2009). Early

intervention can prevent the escalation of burnout symptoms and facilitate timely access to

appropriate resources and support services.

Moreover, interventions aimed at addressing narcissistic traits and maladaptive coping strategies

can play a crucial role in mitigating students' experiences of burnout and promoting adaptive

functioning within academic environments (Bergman et al., 2018). Cognitive-behavioral

interventions, mindfulness-based approaches, and social-emotional learning programs have

shown promise in targeting underlying mechanisms associated with narcissism and burnout, such

as perfectionism, emotional regulation, and interpersonal skills (Kaur & Sambasivan, 2018; Lee

et al., 2020). These interventions can empower students to develop more adaptive coping

strategies, enhance resilience, and foster healthier interpersonal relationships within academic

settings.

Furthermore, fostering a supportive and inclusive learning environment is essential for promoting

students' psychological well-being and academic engagement (Bergman et al., 2018). Educators

and administrators can implement evidence-based practices, such as promoting collaborative

learning, providing mentorship and guidance, and cultivating a culture of empathy and

understanding, to create a nurturing academic climate conducive to students' holistic development

(Twenge & Campbell, 2009). By fostering a sense of belonging and community within

educational settings, institutions can reduce feelings of social isolation and alienation among

narcissistic students, thereby mitigating their risk of experiencing burnout.

Additionally, promoting self-awareness and self-reflection among students can facilitate their

recognition and management of narcissistic tendencies and burnout symptoms (Bergman et al.,

2018). Psychoeducational interventions and self-help resources can empower students to explore

and understand the underlying factors contributing to their experiences of distress and
 20

disengagement, enabling them to develop proactive strategies for self-care and stress management

(Twenge & Campbell, 2009). By promoting self-efficacy and autonomy, interventions aimed at

enhancing students' self-awareness can empower them to take ownership of their well-being and

academic success.

In summary, the implications for intervention highlight the importance of adopting a

comprehensive and proactive approach to addressing the relationship between narcissistic traits

and academic burnout among university students. By implementing targeted interventions that

address individual-level factors, foster a supportive learning environment, and promote students'

self-awareness and resilience, educators and mental health professionals can mitigate the negative

consequences associated with narcissism and burnout, ultimately enhancing students' overall

wellbeing and academic success.

Definitions of the variables

Narcissistic traits:

Narcissistic traits encompass a range of characteristics associated with narcissistic personality

disorder, including grandiosity, entitlement, a lack of empathy, and a constant need for admiration

(American Psychiatric Association, 2013). These traits can manifest in various behaviors and

attitudes, impacting individuals' interactions with others and their environment.

Academic burnout:

Academic burnout is a psychological syndrome characterized by feelings of emotional

exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment as a result of chronic stress

and overwhelming academic demands (Maslach et al., 2001). It is often accompanied by a sense

of cynicism, detachment from academic work, and a decline in academic performance

 21

Research Methodology

Research Design

This research aims to explore how narcissistic traits intersect with academic burnout among

university students, with the goal of informing targeted interventions and support services for

student well-being and success. To ensure the trustworthiness of the results, several methodological

considerations are taken into account.Firstly, participants are recruited from diverse academic

disciplines and demographic backgrounds to improve the generalizability of the findings. A large

sample size is targeted to increase statistical power and enable subgroup analyses based on relevant

variables such as gender, age, Ethical guidelines for research involving human participants are

strictly followed, including obtaining informed consent, ensuring confidentiality and anonymity,

and allowing participants to withdraw from the study at any time without consequences. Qualitative

data analysis employs a rigorous process

Population

Population included the total students of Institute of Southern Punjab, Multan which were

almost 6000 active students. The whole sample contains students who are enrolled in graduate and

post graduate educational settings.

Sample

The sample was calculated by the statistical formula presented by Morgan and Krejcie in 1970. It's

commonly used to determine the sample size needed for a research study. The formula takes into
 22

account the population size, desired level of confidence, and margin of error. The formula is as

following:

S = X2 NP (1-P) / d2 (N-1) + X2P (1-P), where

S: needs sample size,

X2: refers to the chi-square table value for one-degree freedom at the desired level of confidence.

N: represent the population size.

P: refers to the proportion of the population (assumed to be 0.50 since this would provide the

maximum sample size)

D: refers to the accuracy degree expressed as a proportion (0.05).

So, N=6000, X=85%=1.44, P=50% and d=5% we get

S= (1.44)²(6000) (0.5) (1-0.5)/ (0.05)²(1-6000) + (1.44)²(0.5) (1-0.5)

S=3110.4/15.51

S=200

Research Instrument

In accordance with the research topic, two types of research instruments are used which are:

• N.P.I-16

• Burnout Scale

N.P.I-16

The Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) is a widely used psychological assessment tool

designed to measure narcissistic personality traits. Developed by Raskin and Terry in 1988, it
 23

originally consisted of 40 items. However, a shortened version, the NPI-16, was later created by

Ames, Rose, and Anderson in 2006, consisting of only 16 items.

The NPI-16 assesses various aspects of narcissism, including grandiosity, entitlement, and self-

centeredness. Respondents are presented with pairs of statements and are asked to indicate which

statement in each pair comes closest to describing their feelings and beliefs about themselves.

Responses consistent with narcissism are typically indicated by statements reflecting grandiosity, a

sense of entitlement, a desire for attention and admiration, and a lack of empathy for others. For

example, statements such as "I really like to be the center of attention" or "I insist upon getting the

respect that is due me" are indicative of narcissistic tendencies.

Scores on the NPI-16 are computed by tallying the number of responses consistent with narcissism

out of the total number of items, with higher scores indicating higher levels of narcissistic traits.

The scale provides a brief yet reliable measure of narcissism, allowing researchers and practitioners

to assess these traits efficiently in individuals.

The NPI and its shortened versions are commonly used in both research and clinical settings to

better understand narcissistic personality characteristics and their impact on various aspects of

individuals' lives, including relationships, work, and mental health. However, it's essential to

interpret scores within the context of other assessment measures and clinical judgment, as

narcissism exists on a spectrum, and not all individuals who score high on the NPI will necessarily

have a narcissistic personality disorder.

 24

Burnout scale

The scale typically consists of a set of statements designed to capture various aspects of burnout

experienced by students. These statements may cover feelings of exhaustion, disengagement, and

negative attitudes toward academic work.

Here's more detail about the scale:

1. Exhaustion: Statements related to feeling tired, drained, and lacking energy due to

academic demands. Example: "There are days when I feel tired before I arrive in class or

start studying."

2. Cynicism/Disengagement: Statements related to feeling disconnected, indifferent, or

negative about academic tasks. Example: "It happens more and more often that I talk about

my studies in a negative way."

3. Inefficacy: Statements related to feeling ineffective or incompetent in academic tasks.

Example: "I can tolerate the pressure of my studies very well."

Scoring the scale involves participants indicating their level of agreement with each statement,

typically on a Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree. For some statements,

reverse scoring may be applied to account for negative experiences.

The overall score is calculated by summing up the scores of all items, with higher scores

indicating higher levels of academic burnout. Researchers and educators use this scale to identify

students who may be experiencing burnout and to design interventions to support them.

The Academic Burnout Scale Student Survey helps researchers and educators understand the

prevalence and severity of burnout among students, allowing them to develop strategies to mitigate

its impact and promote student well-being and academic success.

To score the Academic Burnout Scale Student Survey, participants typically rate their

agreement with each statement on a scale.

 25

For example, a common rating scale could be:

1. Strongly Disagree

2. Disagree

3. Agree

4. Strongly Agree

Conceptual Definitions of Variables

Narcissistic Traits:

Narcissistic traits encompass various personality characteristics associated with narcissism,

including grandiosity, entitlement, a constant need for admiration, and a lack of empathy for others

(Ames, Rose, & Anderson, 2006; Raskin & Terry, 1988).

Academic Burnout:

Academic burnout is characterized by feelings of physical, emotional, and mental

exhaustion resulting from prolonged stress related to academic work or study. It includes symptoms

such as cynicism, detachment from studies, reduced academic performance, and emotional

exhaustion (Maslach, Schaufeli, & Leiter, 2001; Salmela-Aro & Upadyaya, 2014).

Operational Definitions of Variables

Narcissistic Traits:

For operational purposes, narcissistic traits can be assessed using the Narcissistic

Personality Inventory (NPI-16), a self-report questionnaire consisting of 16 items that measure

various aspects of narcissism, such as grandiosity, entitlement, and self-centeredness (Ames, Rose,

& Anderson, 2006).

 26

Academic Burnout:

Academic burnout can be operationalized using established scales such as the Maslach

Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES) or the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI).

These scales assess dimensions of burnout including emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced

professional efficacy in the academic context (Maslach, Jackson, & Leiter, 1996; Kristensen et al.,

2005).

Research Procedure

The steps that were taken for data collection was to make the forms first. The form was

made online that is, Google form and in the hard form as well. Form consisted of the important

demographic variables and the other two variables’ questionnaires. The introductory part of the

form consisted of the procedure of research and explanation of its significance. It was followed by

the consent form as well which included the willingness of the participants, their confidentiality

and most importantly how their honest responses are significance for the findings of the study. The

respondents were informed of the study's ethical codes and considerations as well. The total items

were 33 (including both questionnaires) and it took total of 15 to 20 minutes to complete the survey.

Data Analysis

The whole data collected from the students was ready to be input and analysed. For that,

IBM SPSS version 29.0 was used for statistical analysis. Following statistical operations were

conducted:

• Descriptive: Descriptive statistics summarize and describe the main features of the

data collected. This typically includes measures such as mean, median, mode, standard

deviation, range, and frequency distributions for each variable in the study. Descriptive

statistics help in understanding the basic characteristics of the data.

 27

• Reliability Analysis: Reliability analysis assesses the internal consistency or

reliability of a scale or measure used in the study. It typically involves calculating

Cronbach's alpha coefficient, which indicates the extent to which the items in a scale

measure the same underlying construct. A high Cronbach's alpha suggests that the items

are reliable measures of the intended construct.

• Correlation Analysis: Correlation analysis examines the relationship between two

or more variables in the study. It calculates correlation coefficients (such as Pearson's

correlation coefficient) to determine the strength and direction of the relationships

between variables. Correlation analysis helps in understanding how variables are related to

each other.

• Regression Analysis: Regression analysis examines the relationship between one

dependent variable and one or more independent variables. It helps in predicting the value

of the dependent variable based on the values of the independent variables. Regression

analysis can provide insights into which independent variables significantly predict the

dependent variable and the strength of these relationships.

• Independent Sample T-test: The independent sample t-test compares the means

of two independent groups to determine if there are statistically significant differences

between them on a continuous dependent variable. This test is often used to compare the

means of two groups on a single variable.

• ANOVA (Analysis of Variance): ANOVA compares the means of three or more

independent groups to determine if there are statistically significant differences between

them on a continuous dependent variable. It assesses whether there is more variation

between the groups' means than would be expected by chance alone.

 28

By conducting these statistical operations, you have systematically analyzed the data

collected from the students and gained valuable insights into the relationships

between variables in your study.