Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2013 - Coarse and Fine Fish Hook Inflections in Hydrocyclone Efficiency Curves
2013 - Coarse and Fine Fish Hook Inflections in Hydrocyclone Efficiency Curves
Abstract
The literature contains many cases where the shape of hydrocyclone efficiency curves vary from the ideal “S”
shape. These often appear as changes in slope, or inflections. These inflections can be divided into two categories:
“coarse” inflections, which are caused by differences in the density of the minerals being separated, and “fine”
inflections, for which there are a number of competing hypotheses concerning their cause. The existing literature
addresses either the fine inflection or the coarse inflection, but no studies have reported both types of inflection
occurring at once in a single hydrocyclone test. This paper presents hydrocyclone results from both in-plant
studies and laboratory experiments that show both coarse and fine inflections. The industrial significance of
both types of inflections is discussed.
Minerals & Metallurgical Processing, 2013, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 137-144.
An official publication of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc.
Paper number MMP-12-062. Original manuscript submitted October 2012. Manuscript accepted for publication November
2012. Discussion of this peer-reviewed and approved paper is invited and must be submitted to SME Publications Dept.
prior to August 31, 2013. Copyright 2013, Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc.
e
as the combined bulk efficiency curve for
the mixture. Both of the pure components
clearly follow portions of classic S-shaped
efficiency curves, but the combined curve
deviates markedly from an S-shape.
In order for the differences in particle
density to produce a non-S-shaped ef-
ficiency curve, the particles must not only
differ in density, but also must differ in
size distribution, with the heavier mineral
being concentrated in the finer size fractions
(Laplante and Finch, 1984). This results
in the bulk efficiency curve following the
shape of the low-density component at
the coarser sizes, and then switching to
following the high-density component at
the finer sizes. If the relative percentages
of high-density particles and low-density Figure 5 — Example of an inflection at the coarse end of a hydrocyclone
particles in each size fraction are known, efficiency curve due to the presence of particles of very different densities
then it is possible to calculate the bulk (after Laplante and Finch, 1984).
efficiency curve based on the weighted
averages according to the respective weight
percentages of dense and light components contained in the and reclassification of material in the classifier (Luckie and
feed stream (Heiskanen, 1993). This is calculated as shown in Austin, 1975). However, air classifiers have a significantly
Eq. 4 (Napier-Munn et al., 1996): different design than hydrocyclones, and the fine inflection
in hydrocyclones cannot be explained in the same way as in
S(d) = fL(d)SL(d) + [1 - fL(d)]SH(d) (4) air classifiers.
A fine inflection can be modeled by assuming that it is due
where S(d) = bulk efficiency curve value for size fraction d; to changes in fines entrainment as a function of particle size
SL(d) = efficiency curve value of light feed component for size in the hydrocyclone underflow (Finch, 1983; Del Villar and
fraction d; SH (d) = efficiency curve value of heavy (dense) feed Finch, 1992; Kelly, 1991). Such a model is consistent with
component for size fraction d; fL(d) = weight fraction that is the the observation that, in many cases, the fine inflection is most
light feed component for size fraction d; d = particle size (μm). pronounced when the value of Rf is quite high (Pasquier and
The degree to which this effect occurs depends on the dif- Cilliers, 2000). However, the model does not predict two fea-
ference in density between types of particles. The most extreme tures that are often reported for the fine inflection: (1) it does
case is reported by Banishi et al. (1991), where metallic gold not allow the value of S(d) for the small particles to exceed the
particles in a silicate ore produce a pronounced inflection at value of Rf, and (2) it does not account for cases where S(d)
an unusually fine size, due to the extremely high density of for the fine particles first rises, and then falls again.
gold (19.3 g/cm3). A commonly proposed mechanism for the fine inflection is
fines agglomerating to the coarse solids and being preferen-
Fine inflections. While efficiency curve inflections at the tially carried to the underflow, as shown in Fig. 6. (Heiskanen,
coarser sizes are satisfactorily explained by differences in 1993; Finch, 1983). While this mechanism is quite plausible,
particle density and size distribution, the inflections at the finer it is difficult to conclusively prove and even more difficult to
sizes are a completely different phenomenon that has resisted reliably model. In any case, fine inflection has been observed
reliable measurement or modeling. It has even been proposed even in cases where measures have been taken to ensure thor-
that the phenomenon of fine inflections does not actually exist, ough dispersion (Rouse et al., 1987). Therefore, while fines
and that its appearance is due mainly to the difficulty of accu- agglomeration is likely a contributing factor in many cases, it is
rately measuring particle sizes and weights at very fine sizes. unlikely to be the cause of all observed cases of fine inflection.
The effect is sometimes elusive, and some authors have not It is expected that a fine inflection caused by fines agglomera-
observed the fine inflection even after extensive experiments tion onto coarser particles would be most pronounced when
(Coelho and Medronho, 2001), or doubt its significance (Nag- there are many coarse particles and few fine particles, as then
eswararao, 2000). There are numerous proposed mechanisms there would be significant surface area available to carry the
for fine inflection, ranging from particle/particle interactions fines. It would also be expected that the magnitude of the fine
to effects of the laminar/turbulent transition (Majumder et al., inflection would vary depending on the properties of the coarse
2003) and small-scale variations in flow speed and flow direction particles that could lead to agglomeration.
within the cyclone (Wang and Yu, 2010), which have not been Another possible mechanism is based on fine particles be-
conclusively demonstrated. It has also not been demonstrated ing entrained in the wake behind coarser particles, as shown in
whether the fine inflection is a significant consideration, since it Fig. 7 (Neesse et al., 2004; Kraipech et al., 2002, 2005). This
occurs at the very fine particle sizes, where there is often only is supported by the observation that when particles of different
a very small fraction of the total material present. sizes are settling together, the settling rates of the finer particles
The fine inflection is well-known in air classifiers, and can is increased compared to the settling rate that they have when
be expressed mathematically as the result of internal recycling no coarse particles are present. It is reported that this effect
References
Banishi, S., Laplante, A.R., and Marois, J., 1991, “The behavior of
gold in Hemlo Mines Ltd. grinding circuit,” CIM Bulletin, Vol.
84, No. 955, pp. 72-78.
Coelho, M.A.Z., and Medronho, R.A., 2001, “A model for perfor-
mance prediction of hydrocyclones,” Chemical Engineering
Journal, Vol. 84, No. 1, pp. 7-14.
Del Villar, R., and Finch, J.A., 1992, “Modelling the cyclone perfor-
mance with a size dependent entrainment factor,” Minerals
Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 661-669.
Dueck, J.G.; Min’Kov, L.L., and Pikushchak, E.V., 2007, “Modeling
of the ‘fish-hook’ effect in a classifier,” Journal of Engineering
Physics and Thermophysics, Vol. 80, No. 1, pp. 64-73.
Finch, J.A., 1983, “Modelling a fish-hook in hydrocyclone selectivity Figure 15 — Hydrocyclone efficiency curve results for a silica/magnetite
curves,” Powder Technology, Vol. 36, pp. 127-129.
Heiskanen, K., 1993, Particle Classification, 1st ed., Chapman &
mixture at only 10% solids and a feed inlet pressure reduced to 28
Hall, London, pp. 59-60, 87, 264-272. kPa (4 psi). The bypass fraction calculated from the split of water
Jeltema, C.H.N., 2007, Mathematical Modeling of Taconite Circuits, between the overflow and underflow was 0.22 (after Jeltema, 2007)
Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Michigan
Technological University, 414 pp.
Kelly, E.G., 1991, “The significance of bypass in mineral separa-
tors,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-7.
Kraipech, W., Chen, W., Parma, F.J., and Dyakowski, T., 2002, “Modelling the
fish-hook effect of the flow within hydrocyclones,” International Journal of classifiers,” Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 80, pp. 251-256.
Mineral Processing, Vol. 66, pp. 49-65. Napier-Munn, T.J., Morrell, S., Morrison, R.D., and Kojovic,T., 1996, “Mineral
Kraipech, W., Nowakowski, A., Dyakowski, T., and Suksangpanomrung, A., 2005, comminution circuits: their operation and optimisation,” JKMRC – University
“An investigation of the effect of the particle-fluid and particle-particle inter- of Queensland, pp. 326-327.
actions on the flow within a hydrocyclone,” Chemical Engineering Journal, Neesse, T., Dueck, J., and Minkov, L., 2004, “Separation of finest particles in
Vol. 111, pp. 189-197. hydrocyclones,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 17, pp. 689-696.
Laplante, A.R., Finch, J.A., 1984, “The origin of unusual cyclone performance Pasquier, S., and Cilliers, J.J., 2000, “Submicron particle dewatering using hy-
curves,” Int. J. Min. Proc., Vol.13, pp.1-11. drocyclones,” Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 80, No. 1-3, pp. 283-288.
Luckie, P.T., and Austin, L.G., 1975, “Mathematical analysis of mechanical air Plitt, A.J., 1976, “Mathematical model of the hydrocyclone classifier,” CIM Bull.
separator selectivity curves,” Transactions of the Institute of Mining and Vol. 69, No. 776, pp. 115-123.
Metallurgy, Section C, Vol. 84, pp. C253-C255. Rouse, B.D., Clayton, J.S., and Brookes, G.F., 1987, “Confirmation of modelling
Lynch, A.J., and Rao, T.C., 1968, “The operating characteristics of hydrocyclone techniques for small diameter cyclones,” Proceedings of the 3rd Interna-
classifiers,” Ind. J. of Technology, Vol. 6, p. 106. tional Conference on Hydrocyclones, P. Wood, ed., Oxford, BHRA, Elsevier,
Majumder, A.K., Yerriswamy, P., and Barnwal, J.P., 2003, “The ‘fish-hook’ phe- Amsterdam, pp. 7-20.
nomenon in centrifugal separation of fine particles,” Minerals Engineering, Wang, B. and Yu, A.B., 2010, “Computational investigation of the mechanisms
Vol. 16, pp. 1005-1007. of particle separation and ‘fish-hook’ phenomena in hydrocyclones,” AIChE
Nageswararao, K., 2000, “A critical analysis of the fish hook effect in hydrocyclone Journal, Vol. 56, No. 7, pp. 1703-1715.