Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2.5.1 Virtue Ethics
2.5.1 Virtue Ethics
2.5.1 Virtue Ethics
INVITATION
How does the ethical theory based on virtue of Aristotle influence and ditter from thot
einics
of
St. Thomas Aquinase In this lesson, we intend to demonstrate virtue adopted in the
as
Greek antiquity, particularly by Aristotle, and in the medieval period espoused by St. Thomar
Aquinas. The first part of this lesson elaborates Aristotle's virtue theory
which consists of the magin
ot habif and happiness as seen from a teleological vieW. Ihe
Topics neXI Dart eXplicates the
Cnistian perspective of virtue ethics. The discussion contains St. Thomas notion of the natura
aw, its metaphysical tenets and the ultimate happiness.
LEARNING COMPETENCIES
What makes a good person good? This may be a simple question but a question it is
certainly,
that could not be answered simplistically. Virtue ethics addresses this
question by looking
primarily into the goodness of the person before accOunting the good that a
person does. It
from the being that the doing is understood to contain goodness. Since
goodness flows from the
of a good person, nothing good happens randomly or
integrity
accidentally.When we think od
citizen like Aristotle advances political realm where such education happens
Ages. A Greek and which also becomes the direction or
and of human
the excellence of thought
as a manifestation of vituous purpose of the first realm. The realms reassure
character
Thomas Aquinas the honing of the twofold virtues essential to
life, while a
believer like St.
through moral
education goes
cultivated
of the moral
beyond any conscious intenfion
TELOS
orientation naturally flows
agent. The proper
from the agent
who has aready achieved
"End" is the equivalent for an advanced level of moral disposition
English
of education and
the Latin term Telos. For Aristotle, any agent developed through years of virtue
naturally desires an end. By an end,
for I
experience. In this case,
characterisfic
Can mean a product which the agent seeks as habit are desires, wishes, wants or pleasures
to make or an action that
fo be done
is directed toward good ends. Such ends of
For instance, when one the agent's ordered habits reflective of the
is
or accomplished.
phronesis or morally good of
order fo habits
get good virtue of
aspires to excel in class
in
man.
grades, the excellent
class pertormance Is
the phronimos, the practically wise
done while the good grades serve
something
philosophy, the doctrine
as the product. Arising from this teleological In Aristotle's
pracfical redSOn
is
of the mean describes the development of
character of moral agenf's
fo think about and to make
a choice as to how the habit. This doctrine finds the proper place
an end is not of human excellence or performance of the
the end is attained. However, extremes of
by goodness. Whereas the
virtues in between vicious
USUally characterized and
what is too much (excessive)
ends, of whatis
a morally good agent wishes for good On
the bad ends. less (deficient). In this sense, a morallyvirtuoUs
a morally bad agent wants herself
of the latter individual finds himself or micway
a positive note, the experience
indicative of a between the vice excess and the vice of
of
may not be intentional but and a thoughtful person
a challenge deficiency. For instance,
strugglein moral deliberation nor degrading
is that one who is not boasting
to improve such ends.
or herself. Thoughtfulness then
is
in
himself
of excess) and
befween boastfulness (vice
of Another
deficiency).
self-degradation (vice of money.
is wise spender
the
example
as a virtue is midway between
Valuing money and almost
foo much spending (excessive)
Any wise
not spending at all (deficient). to thos
reacts
spender of money strongly thing
who waste money on unnecessary 1o it
keep
and to those who unreasonably
even when badly needed
necessarythings or
toward man
n suffers from
that vicious character trait. genuinely true end
to which the vicious
in a happiness that
pursued with pleasure.
is
or to particular historical
human life in general
Pleasure or happiness is the end-goal of situations, or divine
revelation. The following
deliberate act that a human person the eternal
any are main divisions of the law: "(1)
engages. Nonetheless, this sort of pleasure law, which the norm whereby God governs
is
that seeks fulfillment in God finds its fulfillment to happen in this life is forSt
Aristotle asserts
through the supernatural agent who is God Thomas beatitudo impertecta. The ulfimata
Himself. happiness or beafitudo perfecta, St. Thomq
believes, Can never be pertectly actualized
From theabove, thenaturalcoresponds by human beings yet achieved by the grace
to the human will as a nature (voluntas ut of God. Human's ulfimate end as envisioned
to far
natura) consisting of inherent inclinations by St. Thomas is something beyond this
proportionate to the end in question (2 the a cooperation leading toward a happy lifeas
natural inclination of the form; and (3 Tne promised hereafter, the human activity being
operations that may or may not actually 1ollow instrumentalto the divine activity.
upon the natural inclination (see Bradley, 324).
Because of its supernatural character
doctrine of naturallaw, ST. Ihomas
In this happiness in Thomistic ethics is nof only
puts the human person, particularly numan achieved through thevirtues naturally acquired
as
action,as the center of moral inguiry insorar by humans. Otherwise, human beings would
this person has the natural capacity to discen end up living under the illusion of imperfect
and will for the good end. The intellectual happiness. Ultimate happiness essentially
-
sOurce of the natural law played by practical requires the virtues of faith, hope and lovethat
reason or prudentia- is able to discem whata empower human action to intend and freely
true end is, from which the appetitive power choose the perfect happiness as its ultimate
of the will freely chooses. St. Thomas connects end. Moral or intellectual virtues should be
thelaw's being natural to our intellect's naturalfounded on the theological virtues in orderf1O
power to share in this law. And since this law participate in the law of God. is through ths It
3. What are the similarities and differences between Aristotle's and St. Thomas' virtue-ethics
AUGUSTINIAN DISCUSSION:
St. AugUstine the imperfect happiness attained by human efforts in the Cify of
situates
Man while fhe perfect happiness attained by God's arace, in the City of God. The former cify is
characterized as temporal fueled by the cupiditas or a "'self-centered love of things fhat can be
lost against one's will, making one not only unhappy but unwillingly unhappy" while fhe latfer is
eternal reflecting the caritas or selfless love whereby the true good or the best and ulfimate end
desired by humans is found. As St. Augustine remarks: "There we shall rest and see, we shall see
and love, we shall love and praise. Behold what will be atthe end without end. For what other
end do we have, if not to reach the kingdom which has no ende"
CASE STUDY:
Adopted from "Eric M. Rovie's Abortion: Approaches from Virtue" accessed in https://
KUscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/9499/Auslegung.v25.n02.137-1 50.
pdf;sequence=l
Virtue Ethics - a kind it is of Ethics which asserts that human beings have the natural inclination
to pursue an end which is
happiness.
Prudence -
one of the Cardinal virtues that pertains
it is
to the ability to govern and
discipline
oneself by the use of reason or careful
good judgment.
Temperance -
one of the Cardinal virtues
it is that pertains to the practice of always controlling
the actions, thoughts, or feelings.
to happen or
someone to be with and believing that will happen and be true even somethingit