Rubric Assessment2 1

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT #2 (25%)

The question is designed to attain the followings:

Course Learning Outcomes:


CLO2 Build complete programs involving Selection

Due date : 12 of Dec 2022, before 12 pm).

Weightage : 25% of overall assessment.

Groups/Individual : This assignment has to be done individually.

Environment : You are required to do this assignment in C++ environment as specified for each component. You may use pieces
of code from the lectures and elsewhere giving appropriate references.

Submission

 You are required to submit documentation in the form of printed copy of your codes,output screenshot and assignment rubric.

 Late submission and plagiarism will be penalized, and marks will be deducted.
No Submission Poor Fair Goo Excelle
Attribut Sub-attribute d nt Weight Marks
es 0 1 2 3 4
Includes name,
Includes name, date,
No name, date, or Includes name, date, and program
and program title.
program title included. date, and program title.
title.
Excellent use of
White space makes
Poor use of white space Good use of white whitespace.
program fairly easy to
Coding Standard No Submission (indentation, blank space. 2
read.
lines). Creatively
Organized work. organized work.
Organized work.
Disorganized and messy.
Poor use of variables. Good use of variables. Excellent use
Good use of variables.
ofvariables.

The code is readable


The code is
only by someone who The code is fairly easy
exceptionallywell
knows what it is toread.
The code is poorly organized and very
supposed to be doing.
Readability No Submission organized and easy to follow. 2
The functions, variables,
very difficult to
No comment on statements were well
read. The functions, variables,
functions, variable, documented
statements were well
statements etc. (comment)
documented
(comment)
A logical solution, easy to Solution is efficient Solution is efficient, easy
A difficult and
follow but not the most andeasy to follow (i.e. to understand and
inefficientsolution.
efficient. no confusing tricks). maintain.
Does not included
Partially included Included selection Included selection
selection control
selection control control structure. control structure.
Efficiency No Submission structure. 2
structure.

The code was lengthy


The code was lengthy. Fits a reasonable Fits a reasonable
lengthof code. lengthof code.
Does not execute due to Executes with some
errors. errors.
Executes without errors. Executes without errors.
User prompts are User prompts contain
User prompts are Excellent user prompts,
misleading or non- little information, poor
Runtime No Submission understandable, good use of symbols or 2
existent. design.
minimum use of symbols spacing in output (neatly
or spacing in output. displayed).
No testing/debugging Some testing/debugging
has been completed. has been completed.

CSC126_ASSIGNMENT 1 | QUESTION

You might also like