JUDGMENT

SYED PERVEZ ALI SHAH-MEMBER-III - Allegedly appellant

provided forged and fake Diploma of physical education for her
appointment, therefore, she was removed from service on 19.09.2012.
She preferred departmental appeal, but it was not decide, then she filed
Appeal No.36/2013, wherein on 26.03,2013 an order was passed by this
forum, whereby Executive District Officer (Education), Vehari was
directed to decide the departmental appeal of the appellant within a
period of 45 days.
2. Subsequently, departmental appeal was decide, the matter was
remanded, certain proceedings like probe/inquiry were conducted and
finally appellant was removed from service.
JUDGMENT SHEET
Appeal No.2878/2016
3. The learned counsel for the appellant has argued that appellant was
originally appointed on contract basis, subsequently her services were
regularized that she never ever produced fake documents that Diploma
produced by the appellant was found correct.
4. Conversely learned District Attorney has opposed this appeal. According
to him, appellant produced forged and fabricated Diploma.
5 Arguments heard, record perused.
6. Appellant was inducted on contract basis on 13.07.2009. Before
issuance of salary, authority was required to get verified her credentials. got
verified by the authority, where after Admittedly they were Wirse salary was
issued to her. However, subsequently' three years thereafter proceedings
were conducted against her and she was removed from service without any
justification.
7. As per letter of Controller of Examinations, Skill Development Council
Punjab, Lahore issued vide No. 1(1) SDCL/COE/15 dated 16.11.2015, Diploma
in Physical Education under Registration No.SDCL/IMT/IBD-1101095-A and
Roll No.11054 in the Session 2007- 2008 of appellant Shehnaz Iqbal was
verified. Nothing in its rebuttal is available with the department. As to
tempering of application, nothing is on file to establish that appellant had
tempercd with the same.
8. For all these reasons, impugned orders cannot sustain, thus set aside.
Resultantly, appeal in hand is allowed and appellant is reinstated into service.
Intervening period shall be treated as leave of the kind due.

ANNOUNCED MEMBER-III
27.02.2019
Certified that this judgment consists of 02 pages and each page has been
dictated, read and signed by me.
NEMBER-III