Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Iatf 16949 Audit (Maqmsr) - Ro Cortubi 25.06.2024
Iatf 16949 Audit (Maqmsr) - Ro Cortubi 25.06.2024
TABLE 3 - PERFORMANCE
Automotive QMS Requirement Applicable IATF 16949:2016 Section(s)
3.1 Customer satisfaction 9.1.2.1 Customer satisfaction – supplemental
3.2 Incoming product conformity to 8.6.4 Verification and acceptance of conformity of externally provided
requirements products and services
3.3 Supplier monitoring 8.4.2.4 Supplier monitoring
3.4 Problem solving and root cause analysis 10.2.3 Problem solving
10.2.4 Error-proofing*
10.2.5 Warranty management systems*
10.2.6 Customer complaints and field failure test analysis*
6.6 Change control and change control 8.5.6.1 Control of changes - supplemental
notification
TABLE 9 – SAFETY
Automotive QMS Requirement Applicable IATF 16949:2016 Section(s)
Product Safety* 4.4.1.2 Product safety*
ANNEXES
Automotive QMS Requirement Applicable IATF 16949:2016 Section(s)
(normative) Annex A: Control Plan
(informative)* Annex B: Bibliography – supplemental automotive*
Entreprise: CORTUBI
Responsible for the QMS: Daniel Damaschin
QMS Contact: daniel.damaschin@cornaglia.com
Evaluation criteria
Level Description %
The requirement has not been implemented or the actions maked don't compliance the manufacturer's
Insuffisant specifications. There is no evidence that the organization compliance the requirement but it is already taken 20%
into account in the organization
The activities are implemented implicitly. There are physical evidences but the activities have not been
Informal 40%
documented or controlled. There is no activity related to the preventive approach.
The response to the requirement is effective, evaluated and monitored based on the analysis of risks and
Effective 60%
opportunities.
The action to compliance the requirement is optimized and continuously improved through the results of the
Efficient 80%
efficiency indicators.
The actions maked take into account attributes related to perceived quality such as differentiation, innovation,
Performant 100%
etc.
Entreprise: COR.TUBI
Date: 25.06.2024
Responsible: DANIEL DAMASCHIN
Team: CF COR.TUBI HARTA PROCES
COR.TUBI
FURNIZOR: (denumirea exacta din Certificatul emis de DIRECTOR FABRICA: MARIANA ERDELI DATA AUDIT: 25.06.2024
Registrul Comertului)
Georgeta COMAN
ADRESA: Comuna Domnesti, str Vlaicu Voda nr.13 DIRECTOR CALITATE: DANIEL DAMASCHIN AUDITOR:
DINAMIC CONSULT 2005
2 FOR PRELAUNCH AND PRODUCTION? 3 5.2) INSTRUCTIONS FOR REWORK INCLUDING RE-INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS ARE ACCESSIBLE ?
2 LIST CONTROLS FOR MANUFACTURING PROCESS? 3 5.3) DOES / HAS THE SUPPLIER CONTACTED THE CUSTOMER WHEN N/C PRODUCT HAS BEEN SHIPPED?
2 INCLUDE METHODS FOR MONITORING FOR SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS? 5.4) IS A CUSTOMER WAIVER OBTAINED WHEN PRODUCT / MANUF. PROCESS IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT
3
2 INCLUDE CUSTOMER-REQUIRED INFO.(IF APPLICABLE)? WAS PPAPed?
2 INITIATE REACTION PLAN WHEN PROCESS IS UNSTABLE OR STATISTICALLY OUT 3 IS A RECORD MAINTAINED OF EXPIRATION DATE OR QUANTITY AUTHORIZED?
2 1.2) WORK INSTRUCTIONS ARE AVAILABLE AND ARE DERIVED FROM I.E. CONTROL PLAN MATERIAL SHIPPED ON A CUSTOMER WAIVER/AUTHORIZATION GET PROPER IDENTIFICATION ON EACH
3
2 1.3) JOB SET-UPS ARE VERIFIED, WORK INSTRUCTIONS FOR SET-UP ARE THERE CONTAINER?
2 1.4) ARE THERE PLANNED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES? 3 DOES SUPPLIERS APPROVE DEVIATIONS/WAIVERS FROM THEIR SUB-SUPPLIERS?
2 ARE PACKAGING, AND PRESEVATION OF EQUIPMENT TOOLING AND GAUGES IN PLACE? 21 Total Potential 21 100%
2 ARE SPARE PARTS AVAILABLE FOR KEY EQUIPMENT?
1 DOES MAINTENANCE HAVE WRITTEN OBJECTIVES, THAT ARE EVALUATED AND IMPROVED ON?
2 1.5) I.D. & TRACEABILITY: ARE ALL PRODUCT IDENTIFIED BY SUITABLE MEANS? 6. APROBAREA REPERULUI
2 HAS THE SUPPLIER IDENTIFIED PRODUCT STATUS WITH RESPECT TO INPECTION CHECKS? 6.1) PRODUCT APPROVAL PROCESS - DOES THE SUPPLIER FOLLOW
2
2 WHERE TRACEABILITY IS A REQUIREMENT, DOES THE SUPPLIER MAINTAIN RECORDS? AN APPROVAL PROCESS RECOGNIZED BY THE CUSTOMER?
2. ABORDARE BAZATA PE PROCESE 2 DOES THE SUPPLIER RECORD WHEN CHANGES ARE IMPLEMENTED IN PRODUCTION
2 HAS THE SUPPLIER DEFINED IT'S PROCESSES AND SUB-PROCESSES? 6.3) MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES-
2 HAS THE SUPPLIER IMPLEMENTED AND CONTROLLED IT'S DEFINED PROCESSES? 2 IS THERE EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT THE SUPPLIER PERFORMS CAP STUDIES
2 HAS THE SUPPLIER DEFINED THE PROCESSES INTERACTIONS AND LINKAGES? ON ALL MANUFACTURING PROCESSES?
1 DOES THE SUPPLIER MONITOR SAID PROCESSES FOR "EFFECTIVENESS 2 HAS THE SUPPLIER MAINTAINED SAID CAP STUDY RESULTS?
1 DOES THE SUPPPLIER HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF PROCESS APPROACH? 2 ARE CONTROL PLANS FOLLOWED AND ACCURATE ?
8 Total Potential 15 53% 2 ARE CAP STUDIES DONE AFTER ANY/ALL PRODUCT / PROCESS CHANGES?
3. PERFORMANTA 2
6.5) CALIBRATION/VERIFICATION RECORDS EXIST FOR ALL IMTE
2 3.1) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: DELIVERED PART QUALITY PERFORMANCE TRACKED? INCLUDING EMPLOYEE AND CUSTOMER OWNED?
2 SUPPLIER TRACK DELIVERY SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE INCLUDING PREMIUM FREIGHT? 2 ARE ALL THE REQUIREMENTS AS SEEN IN 6.5 OF MAQMSR?
2 DOES SUPPLIER TRACK CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS, INCLUDING FIELD RETURNS? 6.6) CHANGE CONTROL- HAS THE SUPPLIER A PROCESS TO CONTROL AND
3
DOES THE SUPPLIER MONITOR PERFORMANCE OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES TO HELP REACT TO CHANGES TO PRODUCT REALIZATION
2
ENSURE CONFORMANCE TO CUST. REQUIREMENTS FOR PRODUCT QUALITY AND EFFIENCY? 6.7) CHANGE CONTROL NOTIFICATION-IS THERE EVIDENCE THAT THE
1 3.2) INCOMING PRODUCT-DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE EVIDENCE OF PROPER RECEIVING? 3 SUPPLIER CONTACTS THE CUSTOMER WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE LIKE
2 3.3) DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK THEIR SUPPLIERS' DELIVERED PRODUCT CONFORMITY? IN 6.6?
2 DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK THEIR SUPPLIERS' DELIVERY PERFORMANCE (PREMIUM FRIEGHT)? 28 Total Potential 39 72%
DOES THE SUPPLIER TRACK ISSUES INVOLVING THEIR SUPPLIERS FOR CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS
2
INCLUDING FIELD RETURNS?
2
IS THERE EVIDENCE THAT THE SUPPLIER PROMOTES THEIR SUB-SUPPLIER TO SELF ASSESS 7. RESPONSABILITATEA MANAGEMENTULUI
IT'S PROCESSES? 7.1) PROCESS MONITORING-SUPPLIER TOP MANAGEMENT REVIEW
3.4) SUPPLIER HAS A DEFINED PROBLEM SOLVING PROCESS?
1
2 PRODUCT REALIZATION TO ASSURE THEIR EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY?
2 WHEN REQUIRED BY CUSTOMER IS THE PROPER CORRECTIVE ACTION FORM USED? 7.2) QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND QUALITY POLICY RELATE AND PROPERLY
3
21 Total Potential 33 64% DEPLOYED?
7.3) SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT CONTACTED WHENEVER PROCESS OR
3
PRODUCT DOES NOT CONFORM?
4. AUDIT INTERN 2 HAS THE SUPPLIER IDENTIFIED WHO CAN STOP PRODUCTION ?
1 4.1) Q.M.S. AUDIT - SUPPLIER AUDITS THE QMS REQUIREMENTS FOR SUB-SUPPLIERS? DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE PERSONNEL ON ALL SHIFTS THAT ENSURE
2
2 4.2) MANUF. PROCESS AUDIT-HAS THE SUPPLIER AUDITED EACH OF THEIR MANF. PROCESSES? CONFORMITY TO PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS?
2 4.3) PRODUCT AUDIT- THE SUPPLIER AUDITING PRODUCT AT APPROPRIATE STAGES OF PRODUCTION AND DELIVERY TO VERIFY CONFORMANCE? 7.4) HAS SUPPLIER DELEGATED RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY
4.4) SUPPLIER HAVE AN ANNUAL AUDIT PLAN THAT COVERS ALL APPLICABLE QMS PROCESSES? 1
2 TO SOMEONE TO ENSURE CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS ARE ADDRESSED?
2 4.5) DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE QUALIFIED AUDITORS THAT CAN AUDIT ISO-9001 AND MAQMSR? 7.5) QMS REVIEWS AT A MINIMUM INCLUDE QUALITY OBJECTIVES
2
9 Total Potential 15 60% AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION WITH PRODUCT SUPPLIED?
7.5.1) DOES MANAGEMENT REVIEW HAVE AN INPUT OF POTENTIAL AND
2 ACTUAL FIELD FAILURES?
7.5.2) DOES THE SUPPLIER HAVE ROBUST CONTINGENCY PLANS?
2
ANNEX - DOES THE SUPPLIER CONFORM TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF
2 CONTROL PLAN AS STATED IN THE ANNEX OF MAQMSR?
20 Potential 30 67%
puncte puncte
castigate disponibile Rezumat % Status
29 45 PLANURI DE CONTROL 64% YELLOW 0 Furnizorul nu poate demonstra conformitatea cu o disciplina existenta.
8 15 ABORDARE BAZATA PE PROCESE 53% RED 1 Furnizorul are un proces incomplet sau partial implementat.
21 33 PERFORMANTA 64% YELLOW 2 Furnizorul nu poate demonstra conformitatea completa.
9 15 AUDIT INTERN 60% YELLOW Furnizorul are un proces complet documentat si poate sa demonstreze
3
21 21 CONTROLUL PRODUSULUI NECONFORM 100% GREEN conformitatea completa.
28 39 APROBAREA REPERULUI 72% YELLOW N/A Nu este aplicabil.
20 30 RESPONSABILITATEA MANAGEMENTULUI 67% YELLOW
136 198 TOTAL: 69% YELLOW 85% 60-85% <59%
PERFORMANTA 64%
P - ACTION PLAN
Entreprise: COR.TUBI
Date: 25.06.2024
Responsible: DANIEL DAMASCHIN
Team: CF COR.TUBI HARTA PROCES
Signature of the person
responsible for self- GEORGETA COMAN
assessment: