Project Rubric (TRS501&TRS601)
Criteria
Content 1-2
40% + Many requirements
(Ideas, (length, genre, etc.) were
organization) not met.
+ All content and language
are inappropriate for the
target audience.
+ Content is unfocused
and irrelevant to the topic.
+ There is no apparent
pattern of organization.
Design/ 1-2
Conventions + Design is inconsistent. It
40% is often difficult to locate
important content.
+ Graphics which were
chosen randomly are low
quality, and distract
readers.
+ Frequent errors (word
choice, grammar,
punctuation, spelling,
formatting, etc.)
3-5 6-8 9 - 10
+ Most of the + Almost all the + All requirements were
requirements were not requirements were met. met and some were
met. + Content and language exceeded.
+ Content and language are appropriate for the + Content and language
are quite appropriate for target audience. are entirely appropriate for
the target audience. + Content is focused and the target audience.
+ Content has a focus but supports the topic. + Content is clearly focused
may stray from it at + Information appears to in an organized and
times. have a pattern. thoughtful manner.
+ Information appears to + Information is presented
have a pattern, but the in a logical pattern to
pattern is not consistent. support the topic.
3-5 6-8 9 - 10
+ Product has a good + Product has an attractive + Product has an
layout but some pages layout. It is easy to locate exceptionally attractive
appear busy or boring. It all important content. layout. It is easy to locate
is easy to locate most of + Graphics are related to all important content.
the important content. the theme, and are good + Graphics are related to
+ Graphics are related to quality and enhance the theme, and are high
the theme, and are good reader’s understanding or quality and enhance
quality and enhance interest. reader’s understanding or
reader’s understanding + There were minor errors interest.
or interest. (word choice, grammar, + Basically free from errors
+ Some errors (word punctuation, spelling, (word choice, grammar,
choice, grammar, formatting, etc.) punctuation, spelling,
punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.)
formatting, etc.)
 1-2 3-5 6-8 9 - 10
Process + Group did not work well + Some conflict occurred, + Group worked well + There was a high level of
20% together, conflicts but was solved. There together. Conflicts were collaboration. Members
happened often and were was not strong managed effectively. had good problem solving
not addressed. collaboration among the + Tasks were fairly skills.
+ Tasks were not fairly team. distributed and monitored. + Tasks were fairly
distributed. Only a few + Tasks were allocated distributed and monitored.
team members were fairly, but not monitored. Adjustments were made
active. throughout the process.