Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Порядок проектирования конструкций встроенного этажа при обследовании и реконструкции зданий и сооружений методические указания к выполнению курсового проекта и подготовке к практическим занятиям для студентов направления 08 04 01 Строительство всех фо 1st Edition Коллектив Авторов full chapter download pdf
Порядок проектирования конструкций встроенного этажа при обследовании и реконструкции зданий и сооружений методические указания к выполнению курсового проекта и подготовке к практическим занятиям для студентов направления 08 04 01 Строительство всех фо 1st Edition Коллектив Авторов full chapter download pdf
■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■ ■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ ■
■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ ■
■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■ ■■■ ■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■ 08 04 01
■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■ ■■ 1st
Edition ■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookstep.com/download/ebook-46549804/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://ebookstep.com/product/giao-trinh-be-internet-awesome-1st-
edition-google/
https://ebookstep.com/product/i-ll-be-your-wife-jho-hyo-eun/
https://ebookstep.com/product/marry-me-or-be-my-wife-ally-jane/
https://ebookstep.com/product/the-way-i-used-to-be-1st-edition-
amber-smith/
Osez être trois Dare to be Three Dare Ménage 3 1st
Edition Jeanne St James
https://ebookstep.com/product/osez-etre-trois-dare-to-be-three-
dare-menage-3-1st-edition-jeanne-st-james/
https://ebookstep.com/download/ebook-50797502/
https://ebookstep.com/product/o-menino-que-se-alimentava-de-
pesadelos-colecao-it-s-okay-to-not-be-okay-livro-1-1st-edition-
ko-moon-young/
https://ebookstep.com/product/orgia-dos-loucos-1st-edition-
ungulani-ba-ka-khosa/
https://ebookstep.com/product/de-keyes-zusjes-03-heerlijk-begin-
zoete-strijd-hqn-82-1st-edition-susan-mallery/
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
murdered on these expeditions. On the 7th of December, 1864,
Warren’s Fifth Corps was started southward from Petersburg, to
destroy the Weldon Railroad still further. On their return, they found
some of their men, who had straggled and foraged, lying by the
roadside murdered, their bodies stark naked and shockingly
mutilated. One of Sherman’s men recently related how in the
Carolinas one of his comrades was found hanged on a tree, bearing
this inscription, “Death to all foragers.” A large number of men were
made prisoners while away from their commands after the usual
fruits of foraging—just how many, no one will ever know; and many
of those not killed on the spot by their captors ended their lives in the
prison-pens.
During the expedition of the Fifth Corps alluded to, while the
column had halted at some point in its march, a few uneasy spirits,
wishing for something eatable to turn up, had made off down a hill,
ahead of the column, had crossed a stream, and reached the vicinity
of a house on the high ground the other side. Here a keen-scented
cavalryman from the party had started up two turkeys, which, as the
pursuit grew close, flew up on to the top of the smoke-house,
whence, followed by their relentless pursuer, they went still higher, to
the ridge-pole of the main house adjoining. Still up and forward
pressed the trooper, his “soul in arms and eager for the fray,” and as
the turkeys with fluttering wings edged away, the hungry veteran,
now astride the ridge-pole, hopped along after, when ping! a bullet
whistled by uncomfortably near him.
A DILEMMA.
Kearny.
What was an army corps? The name is one adopted into the
English language from the French, and retains essentially its original
meaning. It has been customary since the time of Napoleon I. to
organize armies of more than fifty or sixty thousand men into what
the French call corps d’armée or, as we say, army corps.
It is a familiar fact that soon after the outbreak of the Rebellion
Lieutenant-General Scott, who had served with great distinction in
the Mexican War, found himself too old and infirm to conduct an
active campaign, and so the command of the troops, that were
rapidly concentrating in and around Washington, was devolved upon
the late General Irvin McDowell, a good soldier withal, but, like every
other officer then in the service, without extended war experience.
His first work, after assuming command, would naturally have been
to organize the green troops into masses that would be more
cohesive and effective in action than single undisciplined regiments
could be. But this he was not allowed to do. The loyal people of the
North were clamoring for something else to be done, and that
speedily. The Rebels must be punished for their treason without
delay, and President Lincoln was beset night and day to this end. In
vain did McDowell plead for a little more time. It could not be
granted. If our troops were green and inexperienced, it was urged,
so were the Rebels. It is said that because he saw fit to review a
body of eight regiments he was charged with attempting to make a
show, so impatient was public sentiment to have rebellion put down.
So having done no more than to arrange his regiments in brigades,
without giving them any discipline as such, without an organized
artillery, without a commissariat, without even a staff to aid him,
McDowell, dividing his force, of about 35,000 men, into live divisions,
put four of them in motion from the Virginia bank of the Potomac
against the enemy, and the result was—Bull Run, a battle in which
brigade commanders did not know their commands and soldiers did
not know their generals. In reality, the battle was one of regiments,
rather than of brigades, the regiments fighting more or less
independently. But better things were in store.
PLATE I.
CORPS BADGES.
What are corps badges? The answer to this question is somewhat
lengthy, but I think it will be considered interesting. The idea of corps
badges undoubtedly had its origin with General Philip Kearny, but
just how or exactly when is somewhat legendary and uncertain. Not
having become a member of Kearny’s old corps until about a year
after the idea was promulgated, I have no tradition of my own in
regard to it, but I have heard men who served under him tell widely
differing stories of the origin of the “Kearny Patch,” yet all agreeing
as to the author of the idea, and also in its application being made
first to officers. General E. D. Townsend, late Adjutant-General of the
United States Army, in his “Anecdotes of the Civil War,” has adopted
an explanation which, I have no doubt, is substantially correct. He
says:—
“One day, when his brigade was on the march, General Philip
Kearny, who was a strict disciplinarian, saw some officers standing
under a tree by the roadside; supposing them to be stragglers from
his command, he administered to them a rebuke, emphasized by a
few expletives. The officers listened in silence, respectfully standing
in the ‘position of a soldier’ until he had finished, when one of them,
raising his hand to his cap, quietly suggested that the general had
possibly made a mistake, as they none of them belonged to his
command. With his usual courtesy, Kearny exclaimed, “Pardon me; I
will take steps to know how to recognize my own men hereafter.”
Immediately on reaching camp, he issued orders that all officers and
men of his brigade should wear conspicuously on the front of their
caps a round piece of red cloth to designate them. This became
generally known as the ‘Kearny Patch.’”
I think General Townsend is incorrect in saying that Kearny issued
orders immediately on reaching camp for all “officers and men” to
wear the patch; first, because the testimony of officers of the old
Third Corps to-day is that the order was first directed to officers only,
and this would be in harmony with the explanation which I have
quoted; and, second, after the death of Kearny and while his old
division was lying at Fort Lyon, Va., Sept. 4, 1862, General D. B.
Birney, then in command of it, issued a general order announcing his
death, which closed with the following paragraph:—
“As a token of respect for his memory, all the officers of this
division will wear crape on the left arm for thirty days, and the colors
and drums of regiments and batteries will be placed in mourning for
sixty days. To still further show our regard, and to distinguish his
officers as he wished, each officer will continue to wear on his cap a
piece of scarlet cloth, or have the top or crown-piece of the cap
made of scarlet cloth.”
The italics in the above extract are my own; but we may fairly infer
from it:—
First, that up to this date the patch had been required for officers
alone, as no mention is made of the rank and file in this order.
Second, that General Kearny did not specify the lozenge as the
shape of the badge to be worn, as some claim; for, had such been
the case, so punctilious a man as General Birney would not have
referred in general orders to a lozenge as “a piece of scarlet cloth,”
nor have given the option of having the crown-piece of the cap made
of scarlet cloth if the lamented Kearny’s instructions had originally
been to wear a lozenge. This being so, General Townsend’s quoted
description of the badge as “a round piece of red cloth” is probably
erroneous.
As there were no red goods at hand when Kearny initiated this
move, he is said to have given up his own red blanket to be cut into
these patches.
Soon after these emblems came into vogue among the officers
there is strong traditional testimony to show that the men of the rank
and file, without general orders, of their own accord cut pieces of red
from their overcoat linings, or obtained them from other sources to
make patches for themselves; and, as to the shape, there are
weighty reasons for believing that any piece of red fabric, of
whatsoever shape, was considered to answer the purpose.
These red patches took immensely
with the “boys.” Kearny was a rough
soldier in speech, but a perfect dare-
devil in action, and his men idolized
him. Hence they were only too proud
to wear a mark which should
distinguish them as members of his
gallant division. It was said to have
greatly reduced the straggling in this
body, and also to have secured for the
wounded or dead that fell into the ST. ANDREW’S CROSS.
Rebels’ hands a more favorable and
considerate attention.
There was a special reason, I think, why Kearny should select a
red patch for his men, although I have never seen it referred to. On
the 24th of March, 1862, General McClellan issued a general order
prescribing the kinds of flags that should designate corps, division,
and brigade headquarters. In this he directed that the First Division
flag should be a red one, six feet by five; the Second Division blue,
and the Third Division a red and blue one;—both of the same
dimensions as the first. As Kearny commanded the First Division, he
would naturally select the same color of patch as his flag. Hence the
red patch.
The contagion to wear a distinguishing badge extended widely
from this simple beginning. It was the most natural thing that could
happen for other divisions to be jealous of any innovation which, by
comparison, should throw them into the background, for by that time
the esprit de corps, the pride of organization, had begun to make
itself felt. Realizing this fact, and regarding it as a manifestation that
might be turned to good account, Major-General Joseph Hooker
promulgated a scheme of army corps badges on the 21st of March,
1863, which was the first systematic plan submitted in this direction
in the armies. Hooker took command of the Army of the Potomac
Jan. 26, 1863. General Daniel Butterfield was made his chief-of-staff,
and he, it is said, had much to do with designing and perfecting the
first scheme of badges for the army, which appears in the following
circular:—