New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Stable Perfect Dual Domination

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.
com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Stable Perfect 3
Dual Domination 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 SYNOPSIS 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 10
(NSHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 11
V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual 12
Domination if the following expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic 13
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination criteria holds. 14
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
∀Vi ∈ V 00 , ∃!Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V 00

:
TV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
IV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[IV (Vi ), IV (Vj )],
FV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[FV (Vi ), FV (Vj )],
and
Va , Vb ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 ⇒ Va , Vb 6∈ EN
∗
SHG }|.
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 15
SuperHyperNotions, namely a Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination and a 16
Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination. Two different 17
SuperHyperDefinitions were started for them, but research has progressed and 18
SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are well-defined and 19
well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented throughout this research. 20
To shine the light and importance of this research, a comparison between this 21
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic SuperHyperNumbers is 22
presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, so clarifications are 23
guided by various tools. Applications are designed to understand the theoretical aspect 24
of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the things that are being researched to 25
explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing research and future research. It is a 26
special case. Cells are viewed in the intended manner. There are different types of them. 27
Some are individual and some are well modeled by groups of cells. All these types are 28
officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but the relationships between them all are 29
officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic 30
SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on “Cancer 31
Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense super-hypermodels open avenues for 32
research on theoretical aspects and “cancer diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific 33
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
research have been considered. It has also been formally collected in the form of several 34
questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of Strongly 35
Stable Perfect Dual Domination. Since there are more ways to get type results a 36
Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination becomes more understandable. In order to 37
master the Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination, there is a need to 38
“re-define” the concept of “Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination mastery”. 39
SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 40
method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a Strongly Stable Perfect 41
Dual Domination. If the specified table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, 42
hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key 43
points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values 44
of SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of 45
its vertices”, ”super edge values&max values of its vertices”, “super edge values” and 46
maximum values of its endpoints”. To get examples and structural examples, I would 47
like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Strongly Stable 48
Perfect Dual Domination. This is the original. Having the foundation of the previous 49
definition in the SuperHyperClass type would be disciplined. If there is a need to have 50
all Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination until Strongly Stable Perfect Dual 51
Domination, then it is officially called “Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination”, but 52
otherwise, it is not Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination. There is some explanation 53
for the original definition titled “Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination”. These two 54
examples are further explored and distinguished because they are characterized in the 55
SuperHyperClass disciplinary methods based on a dominant Strongly Stable Perfect 56
Dual Domination. Because of having Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination, there is 57
a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual 58
Domination” and “neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination”. 59
SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 60
method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic 61
SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table 62
exists. And if the desired table exists, a Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination is 63
redefined to a “Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination”. It is useful to 64
define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to 65
obtain Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect 66
Dual Domination becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic 67
SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic 68
SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 69
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic 70
SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, 71
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and 72
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a 73
SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider 74
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. 75
It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one SuperVertex as an intersection between two 76
given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an 77
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is 78
SuperHyperStar and only one SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. 79
It is SuperHyperBipartite, and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between 80
two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no 81
SuperHyperEdge in common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is 82
given as an intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which 83
form separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one 84
SuperHyperEdge among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a 85
SuperVertex has a SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel 86
suggests specific designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 87
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 88
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 89
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 90
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 91
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 92
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 93
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 94
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 95
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 96
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 97
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 98
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 99
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 100
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 101
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 102
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 103
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 104
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 105
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 106
the longest Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination or the strongest Strongly Stable 107
Perfect Dual Domination in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general 108
results are presented for the longest Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination called 109
Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination and the strongest Strongly Stable Perfect 110
Dual Domination called Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination. 111
Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two 112
SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is 113
necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of any cycle, but literally, it is the 114
transformation of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. A basic 115
introduction to the theory of Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination Neutrosophic, 116
SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 117
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual 118
, Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition

Domination 119
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 120
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 121
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 122
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 123
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 124
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 125
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 126
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 127
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 128
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 129
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 130
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 131
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 132
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 133
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 134
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 135
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 136
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 137
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 138
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 139
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 140
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 141
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 142
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 143
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 144
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 145
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 146
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 147
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 148
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “Strongly Stable 149
Perfect Dual Domination”, in the themes of specialized terms and common words. 150
Particle for direct object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of 151
this scientific research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles 152
for background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term 153
practice. The specific region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and 154
the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. 155
Sometimes the movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, 156
uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. 157
This event leads us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic 158
SuperHyperGraph]. Easy understanding of what happened and what was done. There 159
are some specific models that are well known and named and some general models. The 160
movements and effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of 161
cells can be visualized by a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, 162
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). 163
The goal is to find Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination or Neutrosophic Strongly 164
Stable Perfect Dual Domination for SuperHyperModels in it. Some general results are 165
presented. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths 166
have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three 167
SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of cycle, but 168
it is literally a form of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. 169
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 170
“Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on 171
fixed cell or fixed group of cells broadly, “Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination Rate” 172
based on fixed groups or fixed cells. Groups of groups of cells? 173
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 174
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 175
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 176
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “Strongly Stable 177
Perfect Dual Domination” and “neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination” 178
over “superhypergraph” and “neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then this scientific 179
research has taken more motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find some 180
connections among this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates 181
us to obtain examples and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific research. 182
The general results and some of the results about some of the connections are the ways 183
that the key point of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more 184
understandable and clear. 185
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 186
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 187
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 188
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 189
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 190
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 191
new concepts, Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination and Neutrosophic Strongly 192
Stable Perfect Dual Domination, are specified in the sections “Strongly Stable Perfect 193
Dual Domination” and “Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination”. In 194
the concept of dealing with results and in Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination to 195
create logic about the continuation of the scientific research, the ideas of 196
SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their 197
consequences, the corresponding SuperHyperClasses are specified to summarize the 198
work done in this section, as “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on 199
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. Going back to the core concepts, clever steps 200
towards common concepts to extend new concepts in new frameworks, 201
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results on 202
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. There 203
is the initial scientific research on supergeneral relations and as the final and final part 204
of the theoretical scientific research is available in the section “General results”. Some 205
general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and are known as fundamental 206
SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” were extracted and discussed. “Strongly 207
Stable Perfect Dual Domination”, “Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual 208
Domination”, “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 209
SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what has been done about 210
SuperHyperNotions to make sense of the superiority of this scientific research and to 211
discover the word “best” as a description and adjective of this scientific research as 212
presented in the “Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination” section. The keyword of 213
this scientific research was presented in the section “Applications in cancer diagnosis” 214
with two cases and sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps towards SuperHyperBipartite as 215
SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: Incremental steps towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as 216
SuperHyper. In the “open issues” section, there is a detailed examination and 217
recognition of what was done in this scientific research and what happened in this 218
scientific research in the form of “questions” and “issues” in order to understand this 219
scientific research in an outstanding style, the advantages and limitations of this 220
scientific research in addition to What has been done in this scientific research is stated 221
in the “conclusion and final remarks” section. 222
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 223
Research On the Redeemed Ways 224
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 225
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 226
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 227
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 228
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 229
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 230
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 231
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 232
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 233
to Ref. [1]. 234
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 235
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 236
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 237
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 238
+
]− 0, 1 [. 239
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 240
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 241
2.5,p.2). 242
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 243
pair S = (V, E), where 244
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 245
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 246
1, 2, . . . , n); 247
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 248
V; 249
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 250
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 251
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 252
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 253
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 254
supp(Ei0 ) = V, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 );
P
(viii) i0 255
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 256
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 257
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 258
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 259
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 260
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 261
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 262
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 263
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 264
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 265
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 266
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 267
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 268
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 269
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 270
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 271
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 272
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 273
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 274
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 275
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 276
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 278
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 279
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 280
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 281
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 282
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 283
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 284
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 285
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 286
namely, E4 . 287
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 288
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 289
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 290
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 291
SuperHyperEdge. 292
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 293
SuperHyperEdge. 294
SuperHyperEdge. 296
SuperHyperEdge. 298
SuperHyperEdge. 300
SuperHyperEdge. 302
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

SuperHyperEdge. 304
SuperHyperEdge. 306
SuperHyperEdge. 308
SuperHyperEdge. 310
SuperHyperEdge. 312
SuperHyperEdge. 314
SuperHyperEdge. 316
SuperHyperEdge. 318
SuperHyperEdge. 320
SuperHyperEdge. 322
SuperHyperEdge. 324
SuperHyperEdge. 326
Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)





Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 327
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 328
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 329
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 330
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 331
characterized as follow-up items. 332
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 333
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 334
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 335
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 336
HyperEdge; 337
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 338
SuperEdge; 339
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 340
SuperHyperEdge. 341
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 342
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 343
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 344
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 345
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 346
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 347
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 348
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 349
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 350
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 351
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 352
pair S = (V, E), where 353
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 354
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 355
1, 2, . . . , n); 356
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 357
V; 358
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 359
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 360
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 361
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 362
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 363
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 364
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 365
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 366
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 367
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 368
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 369
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 370
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 371
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 372
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 373
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 374
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 375
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 377
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 378
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 379
characterized as follow-up items. 380
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 381
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 382
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 383
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 384
HyperEdge; 385
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 386
SuperEdge; 387
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 388
SuperHyperEdge. 389
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 390
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 391
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 392
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 393
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 394
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 395
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 396
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 397
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 398
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 399
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 400
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 401
given SuperHyperEdges; 402
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 403
SuperHyperEdges; 404
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 405
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 406
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 407
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 408
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 409
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 410
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 411
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 412
common SuperVertex. 413
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 414
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 415
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 416
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 417
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 418
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 419
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 420
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 421
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 422
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 423
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 424
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 425
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 426
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 427
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 428
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 429
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 430
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 431
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 432
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 433
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 434
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 435
is up. 436
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 437
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 438
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 439
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 440
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 441
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 442
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 443
of following conditions hold: 444
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 445
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 446
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 447
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 448
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 449
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 450
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 451
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 452
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 453
Vi0 , Vi+1
0
∈ Ei0 . 454
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 455
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 456
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 457
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 458
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 459
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 460
SuperHyperPath . 461
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 462
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 464
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 465
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 466
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 467
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 468
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 469
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 470
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 471
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 472
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 473
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 474
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 475
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 476
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 477
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 479
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 480
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 482
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 483
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 484
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 485
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 486
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 487
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 488
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 489
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 490
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 491
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 492
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 493
understandable. 494

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 495
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 496
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 497
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 498
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 499
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 500
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 501
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 502
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 503
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 504
understandable. 505
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 506
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 507
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 508
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 509
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 510
Table (3) holds. 511
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 512
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 513
in every Neutrosophic items. 514
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 516
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
4 Main Resultant 523
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable 524
Perfect Dual Domination). 525
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 526
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 527
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination if the following expressions, terms and 528
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination criteria 529
holds. 530
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -


Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
∀Vi ∈ V 00 , ∃!Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 :

and
∗
SHG }|.
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 531
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 532
SuperHyperWheel (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 534
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 535
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi }i6=2,4 . Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 536
SuperHyperStable Perfect Dual Domination since the following expressions, terms and 537
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Dual Domination criteria holds. 538
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−34


Figure 32. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-











V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−34
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−34
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
∀{Vi }i6=1−34 ∈ V = {Vi }i6=1−34 = {},
00
∃!Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vi }i=1−34 :
and
∗
SHG }|.
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi }i6=1−2,4 . Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 542
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−2,4
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V }
i i6=1−2,4
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−2,4
= (0.96, 0.96, 0.96) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
∀Vii=7 ∈ V = {Vi }i6=1−2,4 , ∃V1 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi }i=1−2,4 :
0
TV (EVi ,Vj ) = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
∀Vii=3 ∈ V 00 = {Vi }i6=1−2,4 , ∃V2 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi }i=1−2,4 :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)

∀Vii=5−6 ∈ V 00 = {Vi }i6=1−2,4 , ∃V4 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi }i=1−2,4 :
and
∗
SHG }|.
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi }i6=1−4 . Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 548
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−4
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−4
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−4
= (0.72, 0.72, 0.72) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
∀Vii=7 ∈ V = {Vi }i6=1−4 , ∃V1 ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vi }i=1−4 :
0
TV (EVi ,Vj ) = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
∀Vii=5−6 ∈ V 00 = {Vi }i6=1−4 , ∃V4 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi }i=1−4 :
and
∗
SHG }|.
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi }i6=1−4,7 . Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 554
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−4,7
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−4,7
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−4,7
= (0.95, 0.95, 0.95) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
∀Vii=5−6 ∈ V = {Vi }i6=1−4,7 , ∃V4 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi }i=1−4,7 :
and
∗
SHG }|.
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi }i=5 . Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 560
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i=5
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i=5
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V }
i i=5
= (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
∀V5 ∈ V = {Vi }i=5 ,
∃V4 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi }i6=5 :
and
∗
SHG }|.
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi }i6=1−7 . Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 566
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−7
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V }
i i6=1−7
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−7
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
= max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
∀Vii ∈ V 00 = {Vi }i6=1−7 = {},

∃Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi }i=i6=1−7 :
and
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
∗
SHG }|.
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 569
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 570
SuperHyperStar (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (14). 572
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 573
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi6=2 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 574
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=2
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=2
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=2
= (1.56, 1.56, 1.56) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
∀Vii6=2 ∈ V = {Vi }i6=2 ,
∃V2 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi }i=2 :
and
∗
SHG }|.
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi6=1−2 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 580
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−2
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V }
i i6=1−2
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−2
= (1.3, 1.3, 1.3) =

X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
∀Vii6=1−2 ∈ V 00 = {Vi }i6=1−2 ,

∃V2 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi }i=1−2 :
and
∗
SHG }|.
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−3
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−3
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−3
= (1.04, 1.04, 1.04) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
∀Vii6=1−3 ∈ V = {Vi }i6=1−3 ,
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
∃V2 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi }i=1−3 :

and
∗
SHG }|.
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−4
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−4
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−4
= (0.78, 0.78, 0.78) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
∀Vii6=1−4 ∈ V = {Vi }i6=1−4 ,
∃V2 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi }i=1−4 :
and
∗
SHG }|.
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−5
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−5
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−5
= (0.52, 0.52, 0.52) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
∀Vii6=1−5 ∈ V = {Vi }i6=1−5 ,
∃V2 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi }i=1−5 :
and
∗
SHG }|.
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−6
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V }
i i6=1−6
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−6
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =

X X X
= 00 max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
∀Vii6=1−6 ∈ V = {Vi }i6=1−6 ,
∃V2 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi }i=1−6 :
and
∗
SHG }|.
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−7
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−7
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }i6=1−7
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
∀Vii6=1−7 ∈ V 00 = {Vi }i6=1−7 = {},

∃V2 ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 = {Vi }i=1−7 :
and
∗
SHG }|.
5 Main Result 613
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 614
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar has the letter z. The notion on the 615
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel coincides. 616
Proof. 617
(i). Let 618
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
619
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 620
a new way to redefine as 621
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 622
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable 623
Perfect Dual Domination. The latter is straightforward. 624
(ii). Let 625
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
626
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination taken from a connected Extreme 627
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 628

Perfect Dual Domination. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 631
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 632
SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination 633
could be applied. The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual 634
Domination proposes some longest Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination 635
excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward. 636
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 637
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
638
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 649
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
650
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 661
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
662
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 668
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
669
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Uniform Neutrosophic 675
SuperHyperStar). 676
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 677
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 678
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 679
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 680
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar. 681
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair 682
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 683
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 684
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 685
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel. 686
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 687
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
688
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination number is lower than as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 699
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
700
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 711
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
712
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination number is lower than
as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 718
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
719
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic 725
SuperHyperWheel). 726
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 727
Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic 728
SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in every 729
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination set. 730
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 731
every Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the 732
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in 733
every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination set. 734
Proof. 735
(i). Let 736
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
737
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 743
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
744
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Embedded 755
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar). 756
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 757
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination set. 758
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 759
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination set. 760
Proof. 761
(i). Let 762
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
763
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 769
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
770
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 781
Neutrosophic Recognition 782
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 783
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 784
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 785
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 786
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 787
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 788
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 789
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 790
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 791
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 792
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 793
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 794
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 795
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 796
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 797
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 798
happened and what’s done. 799
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 800
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 801
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 802
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 803
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination, 804
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 805
SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly 806
Stable Perfect Dual Domination or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual 807
Domination in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 808
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 809
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 810
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 811
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (42), the 812
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 813
featured. 814
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (42) and the Table (21), the Neutrosophic 815
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 816
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 817
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 818
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the 819
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (42), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable 820
Perfect Dual Domination. 821
Figure 42. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 822
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 823
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 824
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 825
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 826
Neutrosophic featured. 827
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 828
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 829
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 830
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 831
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 832
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual 833
Domination. 834
9 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 835
Neutrosophic Recognition 836
Cancer is a neutrosophic disease, but the neutrosophic model is supposed to understand 837
what is going on in this neutrosophic phenomenon. The special case of neutrosophic 838
disease is considered and some parameters have been used as consequences of the model. 839
Cells are subject to attack by the disease, but the movements of the cancer in the 840
specific area is a matter of mind. Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer can help in finding 841
some Neutrosophic cures for this Neutrosophic disease. 842
In the following, several Neutrosophic stages are designed for this disease. 843
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer in long-term 844
Neutrosophic performance. 845
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region is assigned by the Neutrosophic 846
model (called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph) and the long Neutrosophic cycle of 847
movement of cancer is identified by this scientific research. Sometimes the 848
movement of cancer is not easy to detect, because there is certainty, uncertainty 849
and neutrality about the movements and effects of cancer on that area. This event 850
leads us to choose another model [which is said to be the Neutrosophic 851
superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what happened and 852
was done. 853
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models that 854
are well known and have names and some general Neutrosophic models. Cancer 855
neurtosophic movements and effects in complex pathways and between complex 856
groups of cells can be visualized by a SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, 857
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 858
SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find dominant neutrosophic Strongly Stable 859
Perfect Dual Domination models or dominant sStrongly Stable Perfect Dual 860
Domination models. 861
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 862
Directions To Forming The Motivations 863
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 864
The SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination and the Neutrosophic 865
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination are defined on a real-world application, titled 866
“Cancer’s Recognitions”. 867
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 868
recognitions? 869
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperStrongly Stable 870
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination?

Perfect Dual Domination 871
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 872
compute them? 873
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 874
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual 875
Domination? 876
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination and the Neutrosophic 877
SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions 878
and they’re based on SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination, are there else? 879
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 880
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 881
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 882
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 883
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 884
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 885
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 886
research are highlighted. 887
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 888
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the Strongly 889
Stable Perfect Dual Domination. For this reason, in the second definition, the original 890
definition of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the 891
alphabets. Based on the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new 892
SuperHyperNotion, Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination, finds a 893
suitable background to implement some results on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some 894
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the subjects of this scientific research on modeling 895
areas that are subject to cancer attacks in order to recognize this disease as mentioned 896
under the title “Cancer Diagnosis”. To formalize the SuperHyperNotion, Strongly 897
Stable Perfect Dual Domination, SuperHyperClasses and new SuperHyperClasses 898
instances are introduced. Some general results are summarized in the Strongly Stable 899
Perfect Dual Domination and Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination 900
sections. Clarifications, examples, and literature reviews go all the way. In this scientific 901
research, the literature review has met the lines containing concepts and results. 902
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are super-hypermodels in 903
“cancer diagnosis” and both are the foundation of the background of this scientific 904
research. Sometimes cancer has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and 905
embedded styles. In this section, SuperHyperModel proposes SuperHyperNotions, 906
formally called “Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination”, based on the connections of 907
Cancer’s movements in the longest and strongest styles with the formation of design 908
and architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The “SuperHyper” prefix 909
refers to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of SuperHyperNotions. 910
In the table (23), the advantages and ways of this scientific research are specified,
Table 23. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination
3. Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
911
pointed out and expressed. 912
12 Background 913
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 914
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 915
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 916
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 917
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 918
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 919
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 920
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 921
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 922
with pages 32-55. 923
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 924
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 925
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 926
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 927
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 928
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 929
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 930
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 931
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 932
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 933
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 934
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 935
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 936
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 937
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 938
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 939
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 940
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 941
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 942
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 943
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 944
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 945
SuperHyperNumbers. 946
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 947
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 948
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 949
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 950
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 951
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 952
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 953
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 954
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 955
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 956
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 957
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 958
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by 959
Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super Initial EULA” in Ref. [5] by 960
Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 961
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental 962
SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic 963
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 964
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 965
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 60-88 and doi: 966
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 967
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graph by 968
Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super EULA-Path-Cut” in Ref. [6] by 969
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 973
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 974
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 102-124 and doi: 975
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124. The research article studies deeply with choosing 976
directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 977
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 978
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super 979
Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and 980
Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [7] by 981
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 985
of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 986
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 987
242-263. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 988
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 989
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal 990
paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 991
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic 992
hypergraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel 993
approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 994
based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic 995
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 996
of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J 997
Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research 998
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 999
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 1000
background. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic 1001
hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward 1002
independent results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — 1003
Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring 1004
alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by 1005
Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” 1006
in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme 1007
of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1008
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty 1009
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 1010
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled 1011
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 1012
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” 1013
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 1014
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1015
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 1016
SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1017
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 1018
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 1019
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1020
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 1021
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 1022
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism 1023
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 1024
Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1025
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1026
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1027
Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on 1028
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by Henry 1029
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction 1030
To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And 1031
Beyond ” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 1032
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” 1033
in Ref. [21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1034
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1035
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1036
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1037
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett 1038
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1039
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1040
in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1041
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 1042
Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1043
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1044
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1045
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1046
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1047
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1048
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1049
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1050
Treatments” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1051
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1052
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett 1053
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1054
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [252] by Henry 1055
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1056
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1057
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [253] by Henry Garrett 1058
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1059
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1060
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [254] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1061
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1062
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1063
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [255] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1064
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1065
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [258] by 1066
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1067
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1068
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [259] by Henry 1069
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1070
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1071
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [262] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1072
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1073
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [265] by Henry 1074
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1075
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1076
in Ref. [266] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1077
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1078
Ref. [267] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1079
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1080
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [268] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1081
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1082
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [269] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1083
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1084
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [270] by Henry Garrett 1085
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1086
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [281] by Henry 1087
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1088
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1089
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [282] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–282], there 1090
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1091
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1092
at [283–427]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1093
readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [428, 429]. 1094
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1095
proposed as book in Ref. [428] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1096
Scholar and has more than 5679 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1097
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1098
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1099
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1100
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1101
proposed as book in Ref. [429] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1102
Scholar and has more than 6667 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1103
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1104
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1105
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1106
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1107
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1108
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1109
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1110
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1111
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–282] 1112
alongside scientific research books at [283–427]. Two popular scientific research books 1113
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic 1114
science is on [428, 429]. 1115
References 1116
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1117
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1118
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (doi: 10.33140/CTMC.02.01.03). 1119
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1120
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1121
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1122
(2023) 35-47. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.01.05). 1123
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1124
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1125
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1126
(2023) 136-148. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.03.03). 1127
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1128
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1129
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1130
(2023) 221-307. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.06.04). 1131
5. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1132
SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super 1133
Initial EULA”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1134
Research 3(2) (2023) 60-88. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88). 1135
6. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1136
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1137
EULA-Path-Cut”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1138
Research 3(2) (2023) 102-124. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124). 1139
7. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1140
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1141
EULA-Path-Cut”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1142
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1143
8. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1144
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1145
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1146
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1147
9. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1148
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1149
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1150
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1151
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1152
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1153
10. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1154
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1155
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1156
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1157
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1158
11. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1159
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1160
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1161
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1162
12. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1163
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1164
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1165
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1166
13. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1167
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1168
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1169
14. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1170
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1171
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1172
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1173
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1174
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1175
15. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1176
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1177
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1178
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1179
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1180
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1181
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1182
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1183
17. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1184
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1185
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1186
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1187
18. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1188
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1189
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1190
19. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1191
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1192
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1193
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1194
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1196
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1197
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1198
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1199
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1200
22. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1201
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1202
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1204
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1208
24. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1209
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1210
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1211
25. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1212
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1213
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1214
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1215
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1216
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1217
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1218
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1219
27. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1220
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1221
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1222
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1223
28. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1224
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1225
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1226
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1227
29. Henry Garrett, “Star and Wheel on Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1228
SuperHyperGraph with a Specific Type of Independency of 1229
SuperHyperVertices”, Preprints 2024, , 2024020663 (doi: 1230
10.20944/preprints202402.0663.v1). 1231
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Perfect Dual Domination”, Zenodo 1233
2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12174846). 1234
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Perfect Dual Domination”, 1236
Zenodo 2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12129978). 1237
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Perfect Dual Domination”, 1239
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Connected Dual Domination”, 1242
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Connected Dual Domination”, 1245
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Connected Dual 1248
Domination”, Zenodo 2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11634496). 1249
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Stable Dual Domination”, Zenodo 1251
2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11513482). 1252
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Stable Dual Domination”, 1254
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Stable Dual Domination”, 1257
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Simple Dual Domination”, Zenodo 1260
2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11253553). 1261
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Simple Dual Domination”, 1263
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Simple Dual Domination”, 1266
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Stable Perfect Domination”, 1269
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Stable Perfect Domination”, 1272
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Stable Perfect Domination”, 1275
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Total Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 1278
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10929590). 1279
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Total Perfect Domination”, 1281
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Total Perfect Domination”, 1284
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 2023, 1287
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10899659). 1288
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 1290
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10895887). 1291
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Perfect Domination”, 1293
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Star and Counteroffer Wheel By 1296
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1297
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Bipartite and Counteroffer Path By 1300
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1301
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Multipartite and Counteroffer Cycle 1304
By Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super 1305
Gatherings”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10640905). 1306
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1308
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1309
10.13140/RG.2.2.17389.97769). 1310
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1312
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1313
10.13140/RG.2.2.28685.10727). 1314
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Strongly Resolving Sequence 1316
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1317
10.13140/RG.2.2.24994.20169). 1318
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1320
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10371529). 1321
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1323
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Dominating Sequence As 1326
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1327
10.5281/zenodo.10263440). 1328
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By STABLE As Hyper Decoration On 1330
Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10028600). 1331
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By STABLE As Hyper Decoration 1333
On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8310454). 1334
62. Henry Garrett, “Recognition of Cancer With Bipartite and Path as 1335
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By the Tool Called Stability”, Preprints 2023, 1336
2023081972 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1972.v1). 1337
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By STABLE As Hyper 1339
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1342
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1343
10.5281/zenodo.8206877). 1344
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1346
10.5281/zenodo.8206834). 1348
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1350
10.5281/zenodo.8206773). 1352
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1354
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1356
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1358
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1360
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1362
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1364
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1366
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1367
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1368
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1370
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1371
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1372
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1374
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1376
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1378
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1381
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1384
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1387
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1388
77. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1389
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1390
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1391
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1393
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1394
79. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1395
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1396
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1399
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1400
81. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1401
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1402
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1405
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1406
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1407
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1411
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1412
85. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1413
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1414
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1417
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1418
87. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1419
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1420
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1423
89. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1425
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1429
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1430
91. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1431
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1435
93. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1437
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1441
95. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1443
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1444
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1447
97. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1449
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1453
99. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1455
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1459
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1460
101. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1461
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1465
103. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1467
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1471
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1472
105. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1473
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1474
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1475
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1477
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1478
107. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1479
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1480
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1481
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1483
109. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1485
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1486
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1489
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1490
111. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1491
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1493
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1495
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1496
113. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1497
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1498
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1501
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1502
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1503
115. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1504
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1505
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1506
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1507
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1509
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1510
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1512
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1515
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1518
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1521
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1522
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1524
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1527
123. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1529
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1530
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1533
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1536
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1539
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1540
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1542
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1545
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1546
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1548
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1551
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1554
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1557
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1560
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1563
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1564
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1566
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1567
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1569
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1570
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1572
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1575
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1578
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1579
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1581
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1584
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1585
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1586
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1588
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1589
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1591
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1592
144. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1593
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1594
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1597
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1600
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1601
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1603
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1604
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1606
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1609
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1612
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1615
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1618
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1621
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1624
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1627
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1630
157. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1632
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1633
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1634
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1636
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1639
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1640
160. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1641
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1643
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1645
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1648
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1651
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1652
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1654
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1655
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1657
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1658
166. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1659
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1660
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1661
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1663
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1666
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1669
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1670
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1672
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1675
172. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1677
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1679
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1681
174. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1683
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1684
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1687
176. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1689
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1690
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1693
178. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1695
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1697
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1699
180. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1701
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1702
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1705
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1706
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1708
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1711
184. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1713
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1715
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1717
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1718
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1720
187. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1722
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1724
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1726
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1727
189. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1728
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1729
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1730
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1732
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1733
191. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1734
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1735
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1738
193. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1740
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1741
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1744
195. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1746
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1747
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1750
197. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1752
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1754
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1756
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1757
199. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1758
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1759
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1762
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1763
201. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1764
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1765
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1768
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1769
203. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1770
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1771
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1774
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1775
205. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1776
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1777
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1780
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1781
207. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1782
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1783
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1786
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1787
209. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1788
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1789
210. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1791
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1792
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1795
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1796
212. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1797
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1798
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1801
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1802
214. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1803
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1804
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1807
216. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1809
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1810
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1813
218. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1815
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1816
219. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1818
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1819
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1822
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1825
222. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1827
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1828
223. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1830
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1831
224. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1833
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1834
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1835
225. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1836
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1837
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1838
226. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1839
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1840
227. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1842
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1843
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1844
228. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1845
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1846
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1847
229. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1848
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1849
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1850
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1851
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1854
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1855
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1858
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1859
232. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1860
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1862
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1863
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1866
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1867
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1870
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1871
235. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1872
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1873
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1874
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1875
236. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1876
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1877
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1878
237. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1879
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1880
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1881
238. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1882
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1883
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1884
239. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1885
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1886
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1887
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1888
240. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1889
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1890
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1891
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1892
241. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1893
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1894
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1895
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1896
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1897
242. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1898
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1899
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1900
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1901
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1902
243. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1903
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1904
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1905
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1906
244. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1907
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1908
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1909
245. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1910
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1911
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1913
246. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1914
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1915
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1916
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1917
247. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1918
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1919
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1920
248. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1921
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1922
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1923
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1924
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1925
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1926
249. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1927
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1928
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1929
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1930
250. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1931
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1932
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1933
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1934
251. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1935
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1936
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1937
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1938
252. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1939
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1940
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1941
253. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1942
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1943
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1944
254. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1946
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1947
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1948
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1949
255. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1950
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1951
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1952
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1953
256. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1954
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1955
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1956
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1957
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1959
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1960
258. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1961
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1962
259. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1964
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1965
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1966
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1971
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1975
262. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1976
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1977
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1978
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1979
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1982
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1984
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1985
265. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1986
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1987
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1990
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1991
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1993
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1994
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1997
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1998
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 2000
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 2001
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 2004
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 2005
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 2007
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 2008
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 2010
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2015
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 2016
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2020
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 2021
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 2024
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 2027
277. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 2028
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 2029
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 2030
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 2031
278. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 2032
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 2033
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 2034
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 2035
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 2038
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 2039
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 2042
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 2043
281. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 2044
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2045
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 2046
282. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 2047
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 2048
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 2049
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 2050
283. Henry Garrett, “Dual Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 4”. Dr. 2051
Henry Garrett, 2024 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11876996). 2052
287. Henry Garrett, “Perfect Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 3”. Dr. 2059
288. Henry Garrett, “Perfect Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 2”. Dr. 2061
289. Henry Garrett, “Perfect Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2063
290. Henry Garrett, “Stable Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2065
291. Henry Garrett, “Resolving Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2067
292. Henry Garrett, “Dominating Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2069
293. Henry Garrett, “Stable In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2071
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8210033). 2072
294. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 2073
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8206898). 2074
295. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 2075
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 2076
296. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 2077
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8194003). 2078
297. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2079
298. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2081
299. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2083
300. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2085
301. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2087
302. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2089
303. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2091
304. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2093
305. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2095
306. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2097
307. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2099
308. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2101
309. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2103
310. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2105
311. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2107
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 2108
312. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2109
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 2110
313. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2111
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 2112
314. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2113
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 2114
315. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2115
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 2116
316. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2117
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 2118
317. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2119
318. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2121
319. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2123
320. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2125
321. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2127
322. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2129
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 2130
323. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2131
324. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2133
325. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2135
326. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2137
327. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2139
328. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2141
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 2142
329. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2143
330. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2145
331. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2147
332. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2149
333. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2151
334. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2153
335. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2155
336. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2157
337. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2159
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2160
338. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2161
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2162
339. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2163
340. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2165
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2166
341. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2167
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2168
342. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2169
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2170
343. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2171
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2172
344. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2173
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2174
345. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2175
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2176
346. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2177
347. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2179
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2180
348. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2181
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2182
349. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2183
350. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2185
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2186
351. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2187
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2188
352. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2189
353. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2191
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2192
354. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2193
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2194
355. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2195
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2196
356. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2197
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2198
357. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2199
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2200
358. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2201
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2202
359. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2203
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2204
360. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2205
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2206
361. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2207
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2208
362. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2209
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2210
363. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2211
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2212
364. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2213
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2214
365. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2215
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2216
366. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2217
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2218
367. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2219
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2220
368. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2221
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2222
369. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2223
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2224
370. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2225
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2226
371. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2227
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2228
372. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2229
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2230
373. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2231
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2232
374. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2233
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2234
375. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2235
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2236
376. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2237
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2238
377. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2239
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2240
378. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2241
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2242
379. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2243
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2244
380. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2245
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2246
381. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2247
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2248
382. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2249
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2250
383. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2251
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2252
384. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2253
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2254
385. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2255
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2256
386. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2257
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2258
387. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2259
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2260
388. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2261
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2262
389. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2263
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2264
390. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2265
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2266
391. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2267
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2268
392. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2269
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2270
393. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2271
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2272
394. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2273
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2274
395. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2275
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2276
396. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2277
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2278
397. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2279
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2280
398. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2281
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2282
399. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2283
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2284
400. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2285
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2286
401. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2287
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2288
402. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2289
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2290
403. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2291
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2292
404. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2293
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2294
405. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2295
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2296
406. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2297
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2298
407. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2299
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2300
408. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2301
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2302
409. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2303
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2304
410. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2305
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2306
411. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2307
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2308
412. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2309
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2310
413. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2311
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2312
414. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2313
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2314
415. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2315
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2316
416. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2317
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2318
417. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2319
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2320
418. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2321
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2322
419. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2323
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2324
420. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2325
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2326
421. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2327
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2328
422. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2329
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2330
423. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2331
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2332
424. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2333
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2334
425. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2335
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2336
426. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2337
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2338
427. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2339
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2340
428. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2341
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2342
429. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2343
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2344

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Stable Perfect Dual Domination

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Stable Perfect Dual Domination

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.

com · Manhattan, NY, USA

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Stable Perfect 3

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 10

(NSHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 11

V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual 12

Domination if the following expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic 13

SuperHyperStrongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination criteria holds. 14

∀Vi ∈ V 00 , ∃!Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V 00

SuperHyperNotions, namely a Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination and a 16

Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination. Two different 17

SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are well-defined and 19

well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented throughout this research. 20

SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic SuperHyperNumbers is 22

presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, so clarifications are 23

officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic 30

SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on “Cancer 31

questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of Strongly 35

Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination becomes more understandable. In order to 37

“re-define” the concept of “Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination mastery”. 39

SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 40

hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key 43

points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values 44

of SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of 45

like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Strongly Stable 48

definition in the SuperHyperClass type would be disciplined. If there is a need to have 50

SuperHyperClass disciplinary methods based on a dominant Strongly Stable Perfect 56

a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual 58

Domination” and “neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination”. 59

SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 60

method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic 61

SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table 62

redefined to a “Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect Dual Domination”. It is useful to 64

define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to 65

obtain Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Strongly Stable Perfect 66

Dual Domination becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic 67

SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic 68

SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 69

SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic 70

SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, 71

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and 72

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a 73

SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider 74

a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. 75

It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one SuperVertex as an intersection between two 76

given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an 77

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is 78

SuperHyperStar and only one SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. 79

It is SuperHyperBipartite, and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between 80

SuperHyperEdge in common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is 82

given as an intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which 83

form separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one 84

SuperHyperEdge among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a 85

SuperVertex has a SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel 86

suggests specific designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 87

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 88

cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 91

Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 92

of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 93