Professional Documents
Culture Documents
12 Angry Men Group Essay - Eli, Aditya, Huabiao, Shriya
12 Angry Men Group Essay - Eli, Aditya, Huabiao, Shriya
12 Angry Men Group Essay - Eli, Aditya, Huabiao, Shriya
English 10 Honors
Period 8
18 September 2023
Around 1 in every 20 cases are false convictions, meaning around 12,000 people are
currently in jail for things that they did not do. This could have been the case in the play “Twelve
Angry Men” by Reginald Rose if it wasn't for Juror 8. Some believe that minor characters are the
most impactful in the play due to the arguments they provide and the evidence they bring up.
That being said, we believe Juror 8 had the biggest influence on the story. Although minor
characters are impactful, Juror 8 has the most significant impact on the case due to his airing of
compassion, leadership, determination to find the truth, and resistance to peer pressure.
Throughout the play, Juror 8 shows compassion towards the defendant and the other
jurors. Juror 8 stated that “There were eleven votes for guilty. It's not so easy for me to raise my
hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first” (Rose). Juror 8's compassionate
nature emerged as he single handedly caused the case to continue. He showed thoughtfulness and
care toward the defendant when he could have saved his own time and voted not guilty. If he had
done this, the case would have ended right there and therefore the defendant would have been
unrightfully put to death. Juror 8 is the reason discourse within the jury began and the defendant
Juror 8 showed many leadership traits, and took initiative in many aspects throughout the
play. One moment where this was demonstrated is when he stated “I want to try this thing. Let's
see how long it took him.” (Rose). In the scene in which they recreate the old man walking, Juror
Naqvi 2
8 was the one that initiated it, directed others, and organized what was happening. This is one of
many examples of Juror 8 showing leadership traits throughout the play. If Juror 8 did not take
the lead on this recreation, nobody would have, and this piece of evidence would have been used
Juror 8 was also always determined to find out the truth. As the deliberations were going
on, “NO. 8 swiftly flicks open the blade of a switch knife and jams it into the table next to the
first one. They are exactly alike” (Rose). This evidence shows that Juror 8 was persistent in
finding the truth, and did not want to rely on assumptions. He went out of his way to buy this
knife, despite it not being obligated upon him, which shows the extent he was going to find the
truth. His actions throughout the play show his determination to find the truth.
Another reason why Juror 8 is the most significant character is his resistance to peer
pressure. In the play, the narrator says “Seven or eight hands go up immediately. Several others
go up more slowly” and eventually, “NO. 9's hand goes up slowly” followed by the results
shared as “Eleven to one, guilty”(Rose). Juror 8 was the only person who voted not-guilty and
was not intimidated by the other 11 hands and had the courage to have a different opinion.
Despite the scrutiny from the other Jurors throughout the play, Juror 8 stood his ground and did
not budge. Without Juror 8’s fearless action, the jury would have otherwise made a unanimous
decision against the defendant and he may have been sent to execution not long after.
Many minor characters did help change the outcome of the case, but no other person was
as significant as Juror 8. He played a pivotal role in solving the case and determined the result
that awaited the defendant. Juror 8 showed compassion to the other Jurors, expressed leadership
through the jury, was determined to find the truth, and resisted peer pressure. Everyone can learn
Naqvi 3
from Juror 8 by pursuing the truth despite those who are against you, as well as by reflecting his
Work Cited
https://drive.google.com/file/d/12azckEtQjbzvcPF9I_WUG3MuIFXY3X91/view,