Professional Documents
Culture Documents
US7161049
US7161049
US7161049
Comparative Example 5
Example 2 Hydrogenation of a Mixture of HFC-236fa,
HFC-1225zc, and CFC-1215xc
Hydrogenation and Fluorination of a Mixture of A catalyst comprising 0.8% palladium and 1.2% gold
HFC-236fa, HFC-1225zc, and CFC-1215xc 25 supported on carbon catalyst (1.9 g, 5 mL, 4 to 8 mesh, (4.75
to 2.36 mm)), prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No.
Comparative example 2 was repeated but with anhydrous 5.447,698, was placed in the reactor tube. The catalyst was
hydrogen fluoride co-fed to the reactor. The mole ratio of pre-treated with hydrogen at temperatures of to 200° C. A
hydrogen, fluorocarbon mixture, and HF was 2:1:2: the mixture comprising HFC-236fa (89.4 GC area %), HFC
30
contact time was 10 seconds. The GC-MS analysis of the 1225Zc (7.9 GC area %), CFC-1215xc (2.5 GC area %),
reactor effluent at 200° C. and 250° C. are given below. methylene chloride (0.01%), HFC-143a (0.03%), HFC-1327
(0.03%), and HCFC-226da (0.21%) was fed to the reactor
GC Area. 9%
along with hydrogen; the contact time was 15 seconds.
35
GC-MS analysis of the reactor effluent at 125° C. and 200°
Component 2OO C. 250° C. C. (mole ratio of hydrogen to fluorocarbon mixture=1:1) and
HFC-236fa 94.1 92.5
at 250° C. (mole ratio of hydrogen to fluorocarbon mix
HFC-263fb O.S 2.2 ture=2:1) are given below.
HCFC-235da O.O3
HFC-245fa S.1 O6
HFC-347 O.O3 O.O3 40 GC Area. 9%
HCFC-226da O.O2
HCFC-2S3fb O.2 O.04 Component 125° C. (1:1) 200° C. (1:1) 250° C. (2:1)
Propane O.O2 4.4
Ethane O.O1 O.1 HFC-236fa 93.4 94.1 94.1
Methane O.O6 O.1 HFC-263fb O.O1 O.O2
45 HCFC-235da O.2
HFC-245fa 6.1 5.7 S.6
HCFC-226da O.2
HCFC-2S3fb O.O1 O.O2 O.O3
Comparative Example 3 HCC-30 O.O2
HFC-347 O.O3 O.O3 O.O3
Methane O.O3 O.04
Fluorination of a Mixture of HFC-236fa, 50
HFC-1225zc, and CFC-1215xc Example 3
Example 1 was repeated but without hydrogen. The mole Hydrogenation and Fluorination of a Mixture of
ratio of fluorocarbon mixture to HF was 1:2; the contact time 55
HFC-236fa, HFC-1225zc, and CFC-1215xc
was 15 seconds. The GC-MS analysis of the reactor effluent Comparative example 5 was repeated but with anhydrous
at 300° C. is given below. hydrogen fluoride co-fed to the reactor. A mixture compris
ing HFC-236fa (93.0 GC area 96), HFC-1225Zc (4.1 GC area
GC Area. 9% %), CFC-1215xc (2.6 GC area %), methylene chloride
Component 300° C. 60 (0.01%), HFC-143a (0.01%), HFC-1327 (0.04%), HCFC
HFC-236fa 97.0 1224 (0.01%), methane (0.01%), and HCFC-226da (0.29%)
HFC-1225zc O.2 was fed to the reactor along with hydrogen and hydrogen
CFC-1215xc
HFC-1327
1.1
O.O3
fluoride; the contact time was 10 seconds. GC-MS analyses
HCFC-1224 O.O1 of the reactor effluent at 125° C. and 200° C. (mole ratio of
HCFC-226da 1.7 65 hydrogen to fluorocarbon mixture to HF=1:1:2) and at 250°
C. (mole ratio of hydrogen to fluorocarbon mixture to
HF-2:1:2) are given below.
US 7,161,049 B2
13
-continued
GC Area 96 GC Area 96
5
Component 100° C. (1:1)
Component 125° C. (1:1:2) 200° C. (1:1:2) 250° C. (2:1:2)
HFC-236ea 1.5
HFC-236fa 94.9 95.3 95.4 Methane O.O1
HFC-1225zc O.O3 O.O1
HFC-2S4fb O.O3 O.04 O.09
HFC-263fb O.O1 O.O1 O.O2
HCFC-235da
HFC-245fa
O.2
4.5
O.O1
4.6 4.4
10 Comparative Example 8
HFC-347 O.04 O.04 O.04
HCFC-226da O.3 O.O2 Hydrogenation of a Mixture of HFC-245fa,
HCC-30 O.O2 O.O1 HFC-1225Zc, and HFC-1234ze
Methane O.O1 O.O2 O.OS
15 A mixture comprising HFC-245fa (91.9 GC area %),
Comparative Example 6 HFC-1225zc (0.3 GC area %), E- or Z-HFC-1234ze (5.9 GC
area %), HFC-236fa (0.3 GC area %), HFC-236ea (1.6 GC
Hydrogenation of a Mixture of HFC-245fa, area 96), and HCFC-1233 (0.01%) was passed over the 0.8%
palladium/1.2% gold Supported on carbon catalyst used in
HFC-1225Zc, and HFC-1234ze comparative example 7. The molar ratio of hydrogen to
fluorocarbon was 2:1 and the contact time was 15 seconds.
The palladium-doped chromium oxide catalyst (6.89 g) The GC-MS analysis of the reactor effluent at 200° C. is
used in comparative example 4 was placed in the reactor given below.
tube heated in a fluidized sand bath. A mixture comprising
HFC-245fa (91.9 GC area %), HFC-1225zc (0.34 GC area 25
%), E- or Z-HFC-1234ze (5.9 GC area %), HFC-236fa (0.3 GC Area. 9%
GC area %), HFC-236ea (1.6 GC area %), and HCFC-1233 Component 200° C. (2:1)
(0.01%) was fed to the reactor along with hydrogen; the
contact time was 15 seconds. GC-MS analysis of the reactor HFC-245fa
HFC-2S4fb
92.0
6.1
effluent at 100° C. and 200° C. (mole ratio of hydrogen to 30
HFC-236fa 0.4
fluorocarbon mixture=1:1) and at 200° C. (mole ratio of HFC-236ea 1.5
hydrogen to fluorocarbon mixture-2: 1) are given below. Methane O.O1
GC Area. 9%
35
What is claimed is:
Component 100° C. (1:1) 200° C. (1:1) 200° C. (2:1)
1. A process for purifying a hydrofluoropropane compris
HFC-245fa 93.9 87.2 74.5 ing:
HFC-2S4fb 4.3 2.3 2.6
HFC-1234ze (EZ) O.O6 O.2 contacting a first mixture comprising a hydrofluoropro
HFC-263fb 8.5 20.6 40 pane, an olefinic impurity and a saturated chlorinated
HFC-236fa O.3 O.3 O.2 impurity with hydrogen and hydrogen fluoride concur
HFC-236ea 1.4 1.3 1.3
Ethane O.2 0.4
rently in the presence of a bifunctional catalyst,
Methane O.09 O.08 whereby said olefinic impurity is converted to at least
one first saturated derivative selected from the group
45 consisting of a saturated hydrogenated derivative of
Comparative Example 7 said olefinic impurity and a Saturated hydrofluorinated
derivative of said olefinic impurity, and whereby said
Hydrogenation of a Mixture of HFC-245fa, Saturated chlorinated impurity is converted to at least
HFC-1225Zc, and HFC-1234ze one second saturated derivative selected from the group
50 consisting of a saturated hydrodechlorinated derivative
The 0.8% palladium/1.2% gold supported on carbon of said saturated chlorinated impurity and a saturated
catalyst (1.97 g) used in comparative example 5 was placed fluorinated derivative of said saturated chlorinated
in the reactor tube heated in a fluidized sand bath. A mixture impurity, to form a second mixture comprising hydrof
comprising HFC-245fa (86.2 GC area %), HFC-1225zc (0.9 luoropropane Substantially free of said olefinic impu
GC area %), E- or Z-HFC-1234ze (10.8 GC area %), 55 rity and said saturated chlorinated impurity, and
HFC-236fa (0.4 GC area %), HFC-236ea (1.7 GC area %), recovering said second mixture.
and HCFC-1233 (0.01%) was fed to the reactor along with 2. The process of claim 1 further comprising distilling
hydrogen in a molar ratio of 1:1; the contact time was 15 said second mixture thereby separating said hydrofluoro
seconds. The GC-MS analysis of the reactor effluent at 100° propane from at least one of said first saturated derivative
C. is given below. 60 and said second saturated derivative, and recovering said
hydrofluoropropane substantially free of at least one of said
first Saturated derivative and said second saturated deriva
GC Area. 9%
Component 100° C. (1:1) tive.
HFC-245fa 89.2
3. The process of claim 1 wherein: said hydrofluoropro
HFC-2S4fb 8.8
65 pane is represented by the formula CHmFs, wherein m is
HFC-236fa 0.4 an integer from 1 to 7; said olefinic impurity is represented
by the formula CHC1F, wherein n is an integer from 2 to
US 7,161,049 B2
15 16
4. p is an integer from 0 to 8, q is an integer from 0 to 2. r 10. A process for reducing the concentration of olefinic
is an integer from 0 to 8, and p--q+r-2n; and said Saturated impurity and Saturated chlorinated impurity in a first mixture
chlorinated impurity is represented by the formula CH comprising hydrofluoropropane, olefinic impurity and Satu
ClF, whereins is an integer from 1 to 4, t is an integer from rated chlorinated impurity, comprising:
0 to 9, u is an integer from 1 to 3, V is an integer from 0 to 5 contacting said first mixture with hydrogen and hydrogen
9, and t-u--v=2s +2. fluoride concurrently in the presence of a bifunctional
4. The process of claim 1 wherein said contacting is catalyst, whereby at least a portion of said olefinic
carried out in the vapor phase at a temperature of from about impurity is converted to at least one first saturated
100° C. to about 400° C. derivative selected from the group consisting of a
5. The process of claim 1 wherein said bifunctional 10 saturated hydrogenated derivative of said olefinic
catalyst comprises a transition metal Supported on a fluori impurity and a saturated hydrofluorinated derivative of
nation catalyst, wherein said transition metal is selected said olefinic impurity, and whereby at least a portion of
from the group consisting of palladium, platinum and gold. said Saturated chlorinated impurity is converted to at
6. The process of claim 5 wherein said fluorination least one second saturated derivative selected from the
catalyst is selected from the group consisting of carbon, 15 group consisting of a saturated hydrodechlorinated
fluorinated aluminum(III) oxide, and fluorinated chromium derivative of said saturated chlorinated impurity and a
(III) oxide. saturated fluorinated derivative of said saturated chlo
7. The process of claim 1 wherein said bifunctional rinated impurity, to form a second mixture comprising
catalyst comprises an alloy of gold and palladium Supported hydrofluoropropane wherein the concentration of said
on carbon. olefinic impurity and said saturated chlorinated impu
8. The process of claim 1 wherein said second mixture rity is reduced from the concentration of said olefinic
contains less than about 500 ppm of each of said olefinic impurity and said Saturated chlorinated impurity con
impurity and said Saturated chlorinated impurity. tained in said first mixture, and
9. The process of claim 1 wherein said second mixture recovering said second mixture.
contains less than about 100 ppm of each of said olefinic 25
impurity and said Saturated chlorinated impurity. k k k k k