Sanz Moreno2012

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Dispatch

R449

6. Caussinus, E., Colombelli, J., and Affolter, M. 12. Wu, V.M., and Beitel, G.J. (2004). A junctional 17. Han, B., Bai, X.H., Lodyga, M., Xu, J.,
(2008). Tip-cell migration controls stalk-cell problem of apical proportions: epithelial Yang, B.B., Keshavjee, S., Post, M., and Liu, M.
intercalation during Drosophila tracheal tube tube-size control by septate junctions in the (2004). Conversion of mechanical force into
elongation. Curr. Biol. 18, 1727–1734. Drosophila tracheal system. Curr. Opin. Cell biochemical signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 279,
7. Forster, D., and Luschnig, S. (2012). Src42A- Biol. 16, 493–499. 54793–54801.
dependent polarized cell shape changes 13. Chung, S., Vining, M.S., Bradley, P.L., 18. Wang, Y., Botvinick, E.L., Zhao, Y.,
mediate epithelial tube elongation in Chan, C.C., Wharton, K.A., Jr., and Berns, M.W., Usami, S., Tsien, R.Y., and
Drosophila. Nat. Cell Biol., epub ahead of print. Andrew, D.J. (2009). Serrano (sano) functions Chien, S. (2005). Visualizing the mechanical
8. Nelson, K.S., Khan, Z., Molnar, I., Mihaly, J., with the planar cell polarity genes to control activation of Src. Nature 434, 1040–1045.
Kaschube, M., and Beitel, G.J. (2012). tracheal tube length. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000746. 19. Marx, M., Warren, S.L., and Madri, J.A. (2001).
Drosophila Src regulates anisotropic apical 14. Beitel, G.J., and Krasnow, M.A. (2000). Genetic pp60(c-src) modulates microvascular
surface growth to control epithelial tube size. control of epithelial tube size in the Drosophila endothelial phenotype and in vitro
Nat. Cell Biol., epub ahead of print. tracheal system. Development 127, 3271–3282. angiogenesis. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 70, 201–213.
9. Thomas, S.M., and Brugge, J.S. (1997). Cellular 15. Takahashi, M., Takahashi, F., Ui-Tei, K., 20. Sweeney, W.E., Jr., von Vigier, R.O., Frost, P.,
functions regulated by Src family kinases. Kojima, T., and Saigo, K. (2005). Requirements and Avner, E.D. (2008). Src inhibition
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13, 513–609. of genetic interactions between Src42A, ameliorates polycystic kidney disease. J. Am.
10. Takahashi, F., Endo, S., Kojima, T., and armadillo and shotgun, a gene encoding Soc. Nephrol. 19, 1331–1341.
Saigo, K. (1996). Regulation of cell-cell contacts E-cadherin, for normal development in
in developing Drosophila eyes by Dsrc41, Drosophila. Development 132, 2547–2559.
a new, close relative of vertebrate c-src. Genes 16. Aspenstrom, P., Richnau, N., and Biozentrum der Universität Basel, CH-4056
Dev. 10, 1645–1656. Johansson, A.S. (2006). The
11. Shindo, M., Wada, H., Kaido, M., Tateno, M., diaphanous-related formin DAAM1 Basel, Switzerland.
Aigaki, T., Tsuda, L., and Hayashi, S. (2008). collaborates with the Rho GTPases RhoA *E-mail: Markus.Affolter@unibas.ch
Dual function of Src in the maintenance of and Cdc42, CIP4 and Src in regulating cell
adherens junctions during tracheal epithelial morphogenesis and actin dynamics. Exp.
morphogenesis. Development 135, 1355–1364. Cell Res. 312, 2180–2194. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.033

Tumour Invasion: A New Twist on [5,11,12] through decreasing


Rac-Driven Mesenchymal Migration actomyosin contractility [5,12]. In an
effort to identify new functions of
Twist1, Yang et al. [3] screened for
possible new targets with a particular
Elongated mesenchymal migration of cancer cells is driven by Rac1 activation
focus on miRNAs. They reasoned that
mediated by the adaptor NEDD9 and the exchange factor DOCK3. A new study
Twist1 cooperates with the Polycomb
reports a role for the transcription factor Twist1 in inducing mesenchymal
group protein BMI1 [2] and they
migration by relieving the suppression of NEDD9 and DOCK3 by the microRNA
selected head and neck squamous
let-7i.
cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines that
would have different expression
Victoria Sanz-Moreno cell migration have been characterized levels of the Twist1–BMI1 pairing to
in a number of systems. An elongated compare their migratory behaviour.
The epithelial–mesenchymal transition (‘mesenchymal-like’) mode is The authors performed microarray
(EMT) is a highly conserved and characterized by cell polarization, analysis to identify which miRNAs
fundamental process that governs a requirement for extracellular were co-regulated by both Twist1 and
morphogenesis in multicellular proteolysis [4], and low actomyosin BMI1 and found that these proteins
organisms and is thought to promote contractility [5], and is driven by the co-repressed let-7i miRNA [3]. The
metastatic progression of carcinomas formation of membrane protrusions that authors confirmed that loss of let-7i
[1]. Some key events typical of EMT are result from a localized activation of the induced a morphological switch into
loss of the cell–cell adhesion molecule Rac GTPase [6]. Rounded ‘amoeboid’ a mesenchymal program of invasion
E-cadherin, gain of N-cadherin and modes of cell migration are driven by [3], with long-lived protrusions that are
augmented expression of certain high levels of actomyosin contractility typical of a Rac-driven phenotype.
transcription factors. EMT leads to loss regulated by Rho–ROCK signalling [5,7] They went on to find that let-7i
of cell–cell adhesion and increased cell or the Cdc42 GTPase [8]. In rounded downregulated NEDD9 and DOCK3
migration and invasion [1]. Twist1, moving cells, high hydrostatic forces [3], both of which are activators of
a transcriptional regulator, induces drive cell movement resulting in Rac and drive mesenchymal
EMT by suppression of E-cadherin [2]. membrane blebbing [9]. Interestingly, movement in several systems
A recent paper by Yang et al. [3] now Cdc42 is capable of regulating [3,5,10,12]. Furthermore, Twist1
reveals that Twist1 is a key regulator of elongated mesenchymal or rounded overexpression induced Rac1
elongated mesenchymal migration of contractile movement via usage of activation in HNSCCs, as a result of
cancer cells through regulation different guanine nucleotide exchange increased expression of both NEDD9
of a microRNA (miRNA) that factors (GEFs) [8]. and DOCK3 [3] (Figure 1).
controls signalling by the Rho-family Elongated mesenchymal movement Interestingly, other miRNAs have been
GTPase Rac. can be driven by activation of Rac1 shown to regulate mesenchymal
Rho-family GTPases are key through the GEF DOCK3 complexed migration: miR-200 family members
regulators of cell migration through their with the adaptor protein NEDD9 [5]. can regulate the plasticity of tumour
actions on actin assembly and Rac1 promotes elongation through cell movement [13] and the miR-200c
actomyosin contractility. Cells can WAVE2-mediated actin polymerization target MARCKS is capable of
migrate as collective groups or as [5,10,11]. Furthermore, Rac1 signalling regulating mesenchymal invasion by
individual cells. Two modes of individual suppresses rounded movement driving cell protrusions [13].
Current Biology Vol 22 No 11
R450

a rounded morphology. One should be


careful when addressing amoeboid
αv phenotypes as several types of
β3
amoeboid migration have been
Src FAK described to date [18]. In the case of
NEDD9 DOCK3 Cdc42 GEFx cancer cells, rounded amoeboid
Rho contractile movement is characterized
Effector x by intensive blebbing. Blebs form when
Let7i the plasma membrane detaches focally
Y722 Rac1
from the underlying actin filament
ROCK
cortex [19], allowing cytoplasmic flow
to push the membrane outwards
rapidly due to hydrostatic pressure in
Twist BMI 1 WAVE2
the cell interior. This high blebbing is
regulated by Rho–ROCK signalling [7,9]
Actomyosin and is characterized by high levels of
contractility
phosphorylated myosin light chain II
Actin assembly: (MLC) [5,12,13]. The round cells
Membrane blebbing cell protrusions described in the study from Yang et al.
[3] lack blebs and instead display short
Actomyosin
contractility protrusions. Furthermore, the levels of
Rho-GTP or phospho-MLC in these
round cells are no different, or in fact
Rounded/amoeboid Elongated/mesenchymal
‘Rac-driven’ invasion lower, than in the elongated cells
‘contractile’ invasion
Current Biology considered in their study [3]. It is likely
that the round cells described in [3] are
different from round ‘amoeboid-like’
Figure 1. Rac GTPase signalling in elongated mesenchymal cancer cell migration and
invasion.
migrating cells [5,7–9,12,13].
Nevertheless, the authors show in very
In elongated mesenchymal migrating cells, Twist1 and BMI1 mediate suppression of the
miRNA let-7i, which results in NEDD9 and DOCK3 overexpression in HNSCC [3]. NEDD9 over- thorough manner that manipulations of
expression promotes elongated mesenchymal motility in HNSCC [3], melanoma [5,12] and Twist1 and let-7i can lead to opposite
breast cancer [16]. NEDD9 and DOCK3 have been reported to cooperate in order to activate results in terms of how they regulate
Rac1 and drive mesenchymal migration in HNSCC [3] and melanoma [5,10,12]. WAVE2, acting elongated mesenchymal migration [3].
downstream of Rac, drives mesenchymal migration by promoting actin assembly to form Twist1 positively impinges on cell
cellular protrusions in melanoma [5,10], glioblastoma [11] and fibrosarcoma [11]. In melanoma
elongation and invasion, and let-7i
cells, NEDD9 acts through integrin b3 and Src to promote mesenchymal migration, as Src
inhibits ROCK2-dependent rounded amoeboid invasion [12]. Cdc42 activation controls elon- suppresses it by inhibiting DOCK3 and
gated mesenchymal migration in melanoma [8] via an unknown guanine nucleotide exchange NEDD9 expression. Another important
factor (GEF). finding in this study is the fact that
suppression of let-7i promotes
HNSCC tends to remain localized at mesenchymal marker, a proposal that tumour-initiating capabilities without
the primary site and regional lymph will now need to be explored in more affecting EMT [3]. It would be
nodes. Severe local tissue destruction malignancies that use mesenchymal interesting to assess whether NEDD9,
with a low frequency of distal organ invasion strategies. DOCK3 and Rac1 are involved in
metastasis is observed in HNSCC The question that arises is how tumour initiation or whether it is an
patients [14]. To translate their NEDD9 might function in invasion and independent biological effect derived
observations to the clinical setting, metastasis. It is a member of the from let-7i suppression that does not
Yang et al. [3] made the interesting p130Cas family and has multiple require the Rac signalling axis.
observation that decreasing amounts partners [17], so it is likely to have Yang et al. [3] have described how
of let-7i are present in a cohort of multiple roles, in addition to the mechanisms of HNSCC dissemination
HNSCC patients with tumours that regulation of Rac activation through rely greatly on mesenchymal invasion
have invaded adjacent tissues. DOCK3. Recent work has reported and its key players NEDD9, DOCK3
Yang et al. [3] find that the that NEDD9 drives elongation and and Rac1 [3], insights that could be
Twist–let-7i–NEDD9–DOCK3 axis has mesenchymal invasion in melanoma useful in the treatment of HSNCC
prognostic value for HNSCC [3]. via engagement of integrin avb3 and patients. Targeting just one invasive
NEDD9 had already been found to recruitment of Src kinase [12]. A key strategy could be an approach against
be overexpressed during human role of NEDD9-dependent Src malignancies that do not metastasize
melanoma progression [15] and was signalling is to suppress ROCK2, so readily and that only use
found to be a marker for elongated which otherwise would drive high mesenchymal migration, as in the case
mesenchymal motility in human actomyosin contractility [12] (Figure 1) of HSNCC. Interestingly Yang et al. [3]
melanoma samples [12]. NEDD9 has that would in turn suppress did not find any correlation with let-7i
also been found to regulate cellular Rac-dependent mesenchymal expression in human metastatic
protrusive activity in breast cancer movement [5,10,12]. HNSCC specimens, suggesting that
models [16]. All of these studies point In the course of their experiments HNSCC metastasis may depend on
to NEDD9 being a bona fide Yang et al. [3] describe cells with different mechanisms compared with
Dispatch
R451

HNSCC local invasion. Tumours like 3. Yang, W.H., Lan, H.Y., Huang, C.H., Tai, S.K., 13. Elson-Schwab, I., Lorentzen, A., and
Tzeng, C.H., Kao, S.Y., Wu, K.J., Hung, M.C., Marshall, C.J. (2010). MicroRNA-200 family
melanomas, which are highly and Yang, M.H. (2012). RAC1 activation members differentially regulate morphological
metastatic [20], may use both mediates Twist1-induced cancer cell migration. plasticity and mode of melanoma cell invasion.
elongated mesenchymal and rounded Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 366–374. PLoS One 5, e13176.
4. Wolf, K., Mazo, I., Leung, H., Engelke, K., Von 14. Garavello, W., Ciardo, A., Spreafico, R., and
amoeboid-like contractile invasion Andrian, U.H., Deryugina, E.I., Strongin, A.Y., Gaini, R.M. (2006). Risk factors for distant
strategies in order to disseminate more Brocker, E.B., and Friedl, P. (2003). metastases in head and neck squamous cell
Compensation mechanism in tumor cell carcinoma. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
efficiently. This plasticity could allow migration: mesenchymal-amoeboid transition 132, 762–766.
the tumour cell to cope with different after blocking of pericellular proteolysis. J. Cell 15. Kim, M., Gans, J.D., Nogueira, C., Wang, A.,
environments using a larger repertoire Biol. 160, 267–277. Paik, J.H., Feng, B., Brennan, C., Hahn, W.C.,
5. Sanz-Moreno, V., Gadea, G., Ahn, J., Cordon- Cardo, C., Wagner, S.N., et al. (2006).
of invasive strategies. Following this Paterson, H., Marra, P., Pinner, S., Sahai, E., Comparative oncogenomics identifies NEDD9
line of argument, melanoma patients and Marshall, C.J. (2008). Rac activation and as a melanoma metastasis gene. Cell 30,
inactivation control plasticity of tumour cell 1269–1281.
should be treated with a combination movement. Cell 135, 510–523. 16. Giampieri, S., Manning, C., Hooper, S.,
of drugs that inhibit both rounded 6. Knight, B., Laukaitis, C., Akhtar, N., Jones, L., Hill, C.S., and Sahai, E. (2009).
amoeboid and elongated Hotchin, N.A., Edlund, M., and Horwitz, A.R. Localized and reversible TGFbeta signalling
(2000). Visualizing muscle cell migration in situ. switches breast cancer cells from cohesive
mesenchymal types of movement Curr. Biol. 18, 576–585. to single cell motility. Nat. Cell Biol. 11,
[5,7,8,12]. Other tumour types, such as 7. Sahai, E., and Marshall, C.J. (2003). Differing 1287–1296.
modes of tumour cell invasion have distinct 17. Tikhmyanova, N., Little, J.L., and Golemis, E.A.
glioblastomas and fibrosarcomas, requirements for Rho/ROCK signalling and (2010). CAS proteins in normal and pathological
have been reported to show similar extracellular proteolysis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 711–719. cell growth control. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 67,
plasticity [11]; therefore, blocking both 8. Gadea, G., Sanz-Moreno, V., Self, A., Godi, A., 1025–1048.
and Marshall, C.J. (2008). DOCK10-Mediated 18. Lammerman, T., and Sixt, M. (2009).
strategies would also be necessary in Cdc42 activation is necessary for tumour cell Mechanical modes of amoeboid migration.
order to stop their invasion and/or invasion. Curr. Biol. 18, 1456–1465. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 636–644.
9. Lorentzen, A., Bamber, J., Sadok, A., 19. Charras, G.T., Hu, C.K., Coughlin, M., and
metastasis [11]. The challenge for the Elson-Schwab, I., and Marshall, C.J. (2011). An Mitchison, T.J. (2006). Reassembly of
next few years will be to validate ezrin-rich, rigid uropod-like structure directs contractile actin cortex in cell blebs. J. Cell Biol.
tumour invasion signatures as movement of amoeboid blebbing cells. J. Cell 175, 477–490.
Sci. 124, 1256–1267. 20. Gupta, P.B., Kuperwasser, C., Brunet, J.P.,
prognosis markers and to find good 10. Ladhani, O., Sánchez-Martinez, C., Orgaz, J.L., Ramaswamy, S., Kuo, W.L., Gray, J.W.,
therapeutic targets within such Jimenez, B., and Volpert, O.V. (2011). Pigment Naber, S.P., and Weinberg, R.A. (2005). The
epithelium-derived factor blocks tumor melanocyte differentiation program
signatures. extravasation by suppressing amoeboid predisposes to metastasis after neoplastic
morphology and mesenchymal proteolysis. transformation. Nat. Genet. 37, 1047–1054.
References Neoplasia 13, 633–642.
1. Sleeman, J.P., and Thiery, J.P. (2011). 11. Yamazaki, D., Kurisu, S., and Takenawa, T. Randall Division of Cell and Molecular
SnapShot: The epithelial-mesenchymal (2009). Involvement of Rac and Rho signaling in
transition. Cell 145, 162.e1. cancer cell motility in 3D substrates. Oncogene Biophysics, School of Biomedical and Health
2. Yang, M.H., Hsu, D.S., Wang, H.W., Wang, H.J., 28, 1570–1583. Sciences, New Hunts House, Guy’s Campus,
Lan, H.Y., Yang, W.H., Huang, C.H., Kao, S.Y., 12. Ahn, J., Sanz-Moreno, V., and Marshall, C.J. King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Tzeng, C.H., Tai, S.K., et al. (2010). Bmi1 is (2012). Metastasis gene NEDD9 acts through E-mail: victoria.sanz_moreno@kcl.ac.uk
essential in Twist1-induced epithelial- integrin b3 and Src to promote mesenchymal
mesenchymal transition. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, motility and inhibit amoeboid motility. J Cell
982–992. Sci., epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.024

Population Genomics: How Bacterial the operation of which seemed to be


Species Form and Why They Don’t favored by earlier data from several
groups, including the MIT labs of Martin
Exist Polz and Eric Alm. But now these
workers offer a serious challenge to the
model [2].
Periodic selection, first understood
Two processes suggested to drive bacterial speciation — periodic selection and
through the chemostat experiments
recombination — are generally thought to be mutually opposed. Recent work
of Kim Atwood [3], is what happens
shows that data taken as evidence supporting the former may be explained by
when, in a finite population of
the latter, raising further problems for the idea of bacterial ‘species’.
non-recombining organisms in a stable
niche, a mutant arises that is better able
W. Ford Doolittle would be no ‘interbreeding’. But some to use the niche’s resources. Through
authors maintain that even asexual, selection, all organisms in the
The concept of species is famously non-recombining clones can mimic population will eventually be the direct
difficult, especially for bacteria. Mayr’s ‘biological species’ in important ways. descendants of this favored mutant
‘Biological Species Concept’ — that Specifically, ecologically differentiated ancestor. And because there is no
species are interbreeding groups clonal organisms can maintain recombination, their genomes will bear
separated from other such groups by relatively constant within-population at all loci only direct lineal descendants
reproductive barriers — would not genomic and phenomic similarity of those specific alleles the lucky
apply to bacteria at all if, as once (cohesion) over time, while exhibiting mutant happened to have in its genome
believed, they are always asexual, increasing between-population at the time.
never recombining genetically. divergence. An important driver in this Populations will thus be ‘purged’ of
Obviously, though not trivially, there ecotype model [1] is periodic selection, all allelic diversity accumulated before

You might also like