Indicative Workflow For Accreditation

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Indicative Workflow for Institutional Accreditation

Fully Registered Institution applies for Accreditation Eligibility


A:
Eligibility
Application
Form for Secretariat assesses the
Accreditation submission
Eligibility Submission Submission
Adequate Inadequate

B: Subject Board Grants Accreditation


Candidacy Candidacy Status
The Secretariat provides
Accreditation
Accreditation Guidance to the
Documents
Institution
Prepared:
1. IQA Policy The Institution Conducts Self Evaluation and
2. QMP prepares Accreditation Documents: Submits
3. S.E. Report the Documents to NACTVET
4. Department
Recognition No

Submissions No Revisions Made


Adequate
Yes

Yes

Accreditation Evaluation Visit


Conducted: Report Submitted
to the Subject Board

Institution Recommended to the


Council for Accreditation No
C:
Accreditation The Institution dully
Compliance with Yes informed of the observed
Academic Quality shortfalls and required to
And Accreditation
address them before re-
Standards.
Re-affirmation submitting the application
of Accreditation The Council
after prescribed
Grants No
period of time
Accreditation

Yes

The Institution is issued with Certificate of Accreditation


together with Accreditation Grant Letter specifying
conditions for the granted accreditation

You might also like