Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Finance Commission of India - Powers, Functions and Responsibilities
Finance Commission of India - Powers, Functions and Responsibilities
The Finance Commission of India was established on 22nd November, 1951. It was established
under Article 280 of the Indian Constitution by the President of India. It was formed to describe
the financial relations between the centre and the state.
The Finance Commission has been provided for the Indian constitution as part of the scheme of
division of financial resources between the two different sets of governments. Finance
Commission also serves as as a constitutional body for the purpose of allocation of certain
resources of income between the Union and the State Governments.
Key role
The key role Finance Commission in India is to act as an instrument to divide proceeds of
divisible taxes between the states and the Union government or in cases of taxes that are
collected by the centre but the proceeds of which are allocated between the states, to determine
the principles of such allocation.
The Finance Commission of India also determines the principles of governing the grants in aids
of the revenues of states out of the consolidated fund of India. It is an important function of the
Indian Finance Commission. The commission has the responsibility of considering any matter
referred to the commission by the President in the interest of sound finance.
The President under Article 280 lays the recommendations of the finance commission before
each House of the Parliament with an explanatory note as to the action to be taken on the
recommendations.
The Finance Commission distributes of proceeds of Income-tax between the union and the
states. But taxes on the payments of the central government are attributable only to the union
territories.
Under Article 280 (C), the President may refer any matter to the Finance Commission in the
interest of “sound finance”. Till now the President of India has asked the commission to make
recommendations on the principles governing distribution of the net proceeds of estate duty in
respect of Property Tax on Railway fare and excise duties on sugar and tobacco. The President
also sought recommendations on the rates of interest, and terms of repayment of loans to the
various states by the Government of India.
Finance Commissions mainly focuses on the financial relations between the State government
and the Central government. These recommendations progressively increase share of the state
governments in the proceeds of the income tax. They also increased gradually the amount of
grants-in-aids to be given to the states. As a result the states now enjoy considerable degree of
financial autonomy so necessary for the proper functioning of the federation.
It can be said that the Finance Commission as an autonomous body has served a wonderful
purpose. In, as complex a society as India is, it acted as an agency to bring about coordination
and cooperation for smooth working of a federal system.
Under the Constitution, the basis for sharing of divisible taxes by the Centre and the States and
the principles governing grants-in-aid to the states have to be decided by the Commission every
five years. The President can refer to the Commission any other matter in the interest of sound
finance.
The Commission has been given passable powers to perform its function and within its area of
activity. It has all the powers of the Civil Court as per the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. It can
call any witness, or can ask for the production of any public record or document from any court
or office. It can ask any person to give information or document on matters as it may feel to be
useful or relevant. It can function as a civil court in discharging its duties.
Key functions
The Commission makes recommendations to the president with regard to:
The distribution of the proceeds of taxes between the union and the states.
The principles which should govern the grants-in-aid to be given to the states.
Any other matter referred to the Commission by the President in the interest of sound finance.
The recommendations of the commission are generally accepted by the Union Government as
well as by the parliament.
the distribution between the Union and the States of the net proceeds of taxes which are to be,
or may be, divided between them and the allocation between the States of the respective
shares of such proceeds;
the principles which should govern the grants-in-aid of the revenues of the States out of the
Consolidated Fund of India;
the measures needed to augment the Consolidated Fund of a State to supplement the
resources of the Panchayats in the State on the basis of the recommendations made by the
Finance Commission of the State;
the measures needed to augment the Consolidated Fund of a State to supplement the
resources of the Municipalities in the State on the basis of the recommendations made by the
Finance Commission of the State;
any other matter referred to the Commission by the President in the interests of sound finance.
The Commission determines its procedure and have such powers in the performance of their
functions as Parliament may by law confer on them.
Q.3. Who appoints the Finance Commission and what are the qualifications for Members?
Ans. The Finance Commission is appointed by the President under Article 280 of the
Constitution. As per the provisions contained in the Finance Commission [Miscellaneous
Provisions] Act, 1951 and The Finance Commission (Salaries & Allowances) Rules, 1951, the
Chairman of the Commission is selected from among persons who have had experience in
public affairs, and the four other members are selected from among persons who--
(a) are, or have been, or are qualified to be appointed as Judges of a High Court; or
(b) have special knowledge of the finances and accounts of Government; or
(c) have had wide experience in financial matters and in administration; or
(d) have special knowledge of economics
Q.5. When was the first Commission Constituted and how many Commissions have been
Constituted so far?
Ans. The First Finance Commission was constituted vide Presidential Order dated
22.11.1951 under the chairmanship of Shri K.C. Neogy on 6th April, 1952. Fifteenth Finance
Commissions have been Constituted so far at intervals of every five years.
Ans. The Finance Commission is required to give its report by 30th October, 2019. Its
recommendations will cover the five year period commencing from 1st April, 2020.
2)In understanding the States’ needs, it has ignored the Plan and non-Plan distinctions
3) According to the Commission, the increased devolution of the divisible pool of taxes is a
``compositional shift in transfers’’ – from grants to tax devolution
4)In recommending an horizontal distribution, it has used broad parameters – population (1971),
changes in population since then, income distance, forest cover and area, among others.
5)It has recommended distribution of grants to States for local bodies using 2011 population
data with weight of 90 per cent and area with weight of 10 per cent
10) A basic grant, and a performance one for gram panchayats and municipal bodies
11)The ration of basic to performance grant is 90:10 for panchayats; and 80:20 for
municipalities
12)The total grant recommended is Rs. 2,87,436 crore for a five-year period. Out of which, the
grant to panchayats is Rs.2,00,292 crore. And, the reminder goes to municipalities
14)It has chosen to take the entire revenue expenditure for this purpose. Hence, it has decided
to take into account a state’s entire revenue expenditure needs without making a distinction
between plan and non-plan expenditure
15)The Commission is of the view that sharing pattern in respect to various Centrally-sponsored
schemes need to change. It wants the States to share a greater fiscal responsibility for the
implementation of such schemes.
Minister responsible
Nirmala Sitharaman, Minister of Finance
Deputy Minister responsible
Anurag Thakur, Minister of State for Finance
Commission executives
N. K. Singh, IAS, Chairman
Ajay Narayan Jha, IAS, Member
Prof. Anoop Singh, Member
Dr. Ashok Lahiri, Member
Prof. Ramesh Chand, Member (part-time)
Arvind Mehta, IAS, Secretary
Parent department
Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India
Constitution Edit
The Fifteenth Finance Commission was constituted by the Government of India—after getting
ceremonial approval from President of India—through a notification in The Gazette of India on
27 November 2017.[1][2] Nand Kishore Singh was appointed as the commission's chairman,
with its full-time members being Shaktikanta Das and Anoop Singh and its part-time members
being Ramesh Chand and Ashok Lahiri.[3][4][5]
The commission held its first meeting on 4 December 2017.[6][7][8][9] Lahiri was elevated to the
status of a full-time member in May 2018 and was accorded the status of a minister of state.[10]
[11] Das resigned as member on 11 December 2018,[12] to become the Governor of Reserve
Bank of India.[13][14][15]
In July 2019, the commission's term was extended by a month to November 2019, and its terms
of reference (ToR) were expanded by the Union Cabinet and asked it to consider whether
"adequate, secure and non-lapsable" funds could be provided for funding defence and internal
security, and how would a distinct system to fund defence and internal security be
operationalised.
Aims Edit
The commission was set up to give recommendations for devolution of taxes and other fiscal
matters for five fiscal years, commencing 1 April 2020.[1][2] The main tasks of the commission
were to "strengthen cooperative federalism, improve the quality of public spending and help
protect fiscal stability".[24][25][26] Some newspapers like The Hindu and The Economic Times
noted that commission's job was made harder because of the roll-out of goods and service tax
(GST) regime in India, as, it had taken certain powers concerning taxation away from the union
and the states, and, had given them to the newly formed GST Council.[27][28] The peer-
reviewed journal, Economic and Political Weekly, further noted that even after the passage of
the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003, some states still incur revenue
deficits, so, the commission would have to either recommend the disbandment of revenue
deficit grants, or, would have to recommend ways for further fiscal consolidation.[29]
The commission's chairman, N. K. Singh, said that the commission would need to define
populism, as, the commission's terms of reference (ToR) had a provision for rewarding states
which were successful in eliminating or reducing expenditure incurred on populist schemes.[30]
[31][32][33] Singh added that the commission would need to reappraise the formula of
devolution of revenue through the union's taxes, because of a provision in its ToR.[34][35][36]
Singh further said, in a lecture to Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad students, that one
of the commission's challenges was to find a balance between equity and efficiency,[37] adding
that urban and rural local bodies—the constitutionally-mandated third-tier of government in India
—needed to be further empowered to stimulate added economic growth.[38]
Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India, Arvind Subramanian, said that the
commission may need to function like the first finance commission because of an increased
decentralisation and change in India;[39][40][41] further suggesting to divide the tax devolution
system into four pots – "return", "redistribution", "risk sharing" and "reward",[39][41] while also
saying that tax devolution was no more a north–south issue.[40][41] However, Subramanian's
ideas were opposed by Pinaki Chakraborty, a professor at the National Institute of Public
Finance and Policy, and a member of the Fifteenth Finance Commission's advisory council, who
said that having a division of tax devolution into four pots would violate "the objective of
offsetting revenue disabilities."[42]
The commission's chairperson, N. K. Singh, said in April 2019 that there should be mechanisms
through which the Finance Commissions and the GST Council could coordinate to "ensure there
are multiplier benefits of a higher growth trajectory".[43]
Demands Edit
At its first interaction with members of parliament (MPs),[44] the commission was asked by
some MPs to recommend a plan on compensating states which suffered revenue losses after
the roll-out of GST.[45] Some parliamentarians also asked the commission to reassess the
criteria of classifying a state as 'backwards'.[46][47]
The president of Nationalist Congress Party, Sharad Pawar, suggested the commission to
create a financial buffer against oil prices.[48] Whereas, the chief minister of Bihar and Janata
Dal (United) president and convener, Nitish Kumar—in a letter to the commission's chairman, N.
K. Singh—asked the commission to revisit the criterion of the target of a maximum 3% fiscal
deficit under the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003, calling it "iniquitous".
[48] Singh added, that the state was still waiting for special financial allocations promised to it
under the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000.[48]
The commission, on its visit to the state, was asked by the Government of West Bengal to look
into restructuring the state's debt, so that it doe not become "a permanent drag on the economy
of Bengal";[49][50] the state's chief minister and All India Trinamool Congress chairperson,
convener and president, Mamata Banerjee, said in a press conference, that "we expect that
Finance Commission will consider our demand for debt restructuring or waiver".[49][50] West
Bengal government further suggested an alternative devolution formula based on factors like
social backwardness, locational complexities and continuation of revenue deficits to the
commission.[51]
The commission was asked by several state governments to increase states' share in union's
tax devolution from the existing 42 per cent to 50 per cent.[50][52][53][54] Whereas, the
Government of India asked the commission to review a 10 per cent hike from 32 per cent to 42
per cent in tax devolution given to states by the Fourteenth Finance Commission,[54][55][56]
with Union Minister of Finance, Arun Jaitley, saying that "India is a Union of states, the Union
also has to survive".[55][57]
Working Edit
A meeting of the Fifteenth Finance Commission, attended by its chairperson, members,
secretary and other staffers; c. 2017
The commission visited several states, and held meetings with senior political and non-political
state government officials of different states;[19][50][52][58] most states also generally
submitted a memorandum to the commission outlining their needs and demands to the panel.
[19][50][52][58] It also met with representatives of the industry and bankers.[59][60] Das acted
as chairman of the commission in state visits without Singh.[19] The commission further met
with the representatives of various federal government agencies, including the vice-chairman
and chief executive officer of its quasi-autonomous policy think-tank, the NITI Aayog, Rajiv
Kumar and Amitabh Kant respectively.[61]
The commission was headquartered in New Delhi at the Jawahar Vyapar Bhawan on Tolstoy
Marg and its offices were provided security cover by the Central Industrial Security Force.[62]
[63]
In July 2019, the commission's term was extended by a month to November 2019, and its terms
of reference (ToR) were expanded by the Union Cabinet and asked it to consider whether
"adequate, secure and non-lapsable" funds could be provided for funding defence and internal
security, and how would a distinct system to fund defence and internal security be
operationalised.[16][17]
Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India, Krishnamurthy Subramanian, was inducted
as a member of the advisory council in May 2019.[67][68]
Criticism Edit
Devolution of taxes to certain states Edit
Finance minister of Kerala and CPI(M) politician, T. M. Thomas Isaac was a major opponent of
the Fifteenth Finance Commission's terms of reference
Politicians—including chief ministers and finance ministers—; retired civil servants; judges; and
economists from South Indian states opposed the commission's terms of reference,[71][72][73]
[74] as, it used the data of 2011 census, instead of the data of 1971 census, as previous
commissions had.[75][76][77] Politicians from the south believed that this would dilute the share
of South India in the pool of union's tax revenue, because of its shrinking population vis-à-vis
the north since 1971.[78][79][80][81][82] Communist Party of India (Marxist) central committee
member and Kerala finance minister, T. M. Thomas Issac, proposed a meeting of finance
ministers of the ten states and union territories to discuss the commission's ToR.[83][84][85][86]
In response, Subhash Chandra Garg, Union Economic Affairs Secretary, said that the terms of
reference were balanced and were "not one way or the other", adding that according to the
second provision of the ToR, states with a good total fertility rate—especially, the ones which
had reached the replacement rate (2.1 children per woman)—would be incentivised.[87][88][89]
Garg's views were reiterated by the nation's finance minister and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
Rajya Sabha leader, Arun Jaitley, who—in a Facebook post—said that the row over the
commission's terms of reference was "needless" and could not have been "further from the
truth".[90][91] Prime minister and BJP Lok Sabha leader, Narendra Modi, said that vested
interests were behind the allegations that the commission's terms of reference being biased
against certain states and union territories and called such allegations "baseless".[92][93]
Finance ministers of the states of Karnataka, Kerala and Andhra Pradesh and the finance
minister of the Union Territory of Puducherry met at a conclave in Kerala's capital,
Thiruvananthapuram, in April 2018 and collectively denounced the commission's terms of
reference, calling them to be in contradiction with the principles of federalism.[94][95] Five state
and two union territory finance ministers met in Andhra Pradesh's capital, Amaravati, and
drafted a memorandum to the president, Ram Nath Kovind, seeking changes in the
commission's terms of reference.[96][97] The group of finance ministers eventually met the
president on 17 May 2018.[98]
In July 2018, the vice president, Venkaiah Naidu—in his capacity as the chairman of Rajya
Sabha—asked the commission's chairman, N. K. Singh, if certain states would be penalised
with the use of 2011 census and was ensured by Singh that performing and progressive states
would not be penalised by the commission.[99]
Union Budget is the annual budget of the Indian Republic. It is presented every year in the
month of February generally by the Union Finance Minister. In this page, you can read all about
what a budget is, and what to expect in the Union Budget 2020-21. This is an important topic for
the UPSC exam.
68,473
Union Budget
The Union Budget is also known as the Annual Financial Statement. Article 112 of the
Constitution of India lays down that it is a statement of the estimated expenditure and receipts of
the Government for a particular year.
The Budget keeps the account of the finances of the government for the fiscal year (from 1st
April to 31st March).
The Budget is presented on 1st February (until 2016, it was presented on the last working day
of February) so that it can materialise before the commencement of the new financial year
which starts on 1st April.
In 2017, a 92-year-old tradition was broken when the railway budget was merged with the Union
Budget and presented together.
The Budget has to be passed by the Lok Sabha before it can come into effect.
The Union Budget is divided into Revenue Budget and Capital Budget. For more on these
terms, check Union Budget – Important Economic Terms.
In the Union Budget, the disbursements and receipts of the government comprise the various
types of government funds in India namely, the Consolidated Fund of India, the Contingency
Fund and the Public Account.
The Economic Survey of India is released ahead of the presentation of the Budget. This
document is prepared under the guidance of the Chief Economic Advisor and is presented for
discussion in both Houses during the Budget session.
Highlights of Budget 2020:-
Agriculture
Farmer friendly initiatives such as Agriculture credit target of Rs 15 lakh crore for 2020-21;
schemes of “Kisan Rail” and “Krishi Udaan” for a seamless national cold supply chain for
perishables; and expansion of PM-KUSUM to provide 20 lakh farmers for setting up stand-alone
solar pumps.
Heatlh
In the health sector, the Budget proposes more than 20,000 empanelled hospitals under PM
Jan Arogya Yojana for poor people; and expansion of Jan Aushadhi Kendra Scheme to all
districts offering 2000 medicines and 300 surgicals by 2024.
Infrastructure
Infrastructure receives a boost, with 100 more airports by 2024 to support Udaan scheme; and
operation of 150 passenger trains to be done through PPP mode.
Education
Starting apprenticeship embedded courses through 150 higher educational institutions by March
2021 and a proposal to establish Indian Institute of Heritage and Conservation.
GST
A simplified GST return shall be implemented from the 1st April, 2020. It will make return filing
simple with features like SMS based filing for nil return, return pre-filling, improved input tax
credit flow and overall simplification. Dynamic QR-code is proposed for consumer invoices. GST
parameters will be captured when payment for purchases is made through the QR-code.
In order to further ease the process of allotment of PAN, a system will be launched under which
PAN shall be instantly allotted online on the basis of Aadhaar, without any requirement for filling
up of detailed application form.
Affordable Housing
In the last budget, the Finance Minister had announced an additional deduction of upto one
lakh, fifty thousand rupees for interest paid on loans taken for purchase of an affordable house.
The date of loan sanction for availing this additional deduction is proposed to be extended by
one year, beyond 31st March, 2020.
In order to provide significant relief to the individual taxpayers and to simplify the Income-Tax
law, the Finance Minister has proposed to bring a new and simplified personal income tax
regime, wherein income tax rates will be significantly reduced for the individual taxpayers who
forego certain deductions and exemptions.
The proposed changes in tax slabs are listed in the following table:
0-2.5 Lakh
Exempt
Exempt
2.5-5 Lakh
5%
5%
5-7.5 Lakh
20%
10%
7.5-10 Lakh
20%
15%
10-12.5 Lakh
30%
20%
12.5-15 Lakh
30%
25%
Above 15 Lakh
30%
30%
The new tax regime shall be optional for taxpayers. An individual who is currently availing more
deductions and exemption under the Income Tax Act may choose to avail them and continue to
pay tax in the old regime.
Source : PIB
http://vikaspedia.in/news/summary-of-union-budget-2020-21