Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ali Salam Mahmood - Justinian The Two-Sided Emperor
Ali Salam Mahmood - Justinian The Two-Sided Emperor
Ali Salam Mahmood - Justinian The Two-Sided Emperor
April 17 2016
CIV 203-01
Behind every story of a successful emperor there is a dark side of failure and
tyranny which is rarely exposed to the public. Justinian I, known commonly as Justinian
the Great, (527 – 565 CE) was an orthodox Byzantine emperor who is well known for
his great conquests to restore the old glory of the Roman Empire. During his rule, the
Byzantine Empire gained back the Rome and all the Italian peninsula, southern Spain,
and the southern Mediterranean coast in modern day Tunisia and Libya. The one who
recorded most of his works was Procopius of Caesarea, but it is interesting that the same
author had another book called The Secret History, where he recorded all the downsides of
Justinian's rule. Despite the known justice and laws of Justinian, Procopius was so
focused on illustrating him as a very bad king, even if doing so lessened the credibility of
his work.
Justinian has written his name in history with golden letters in the eyes of lawmen
thanks to his famous laws. Corpus Juris Civilis, also known as the Body of Civil Law is the
set of all legislations he made through his rule. He was one of the firsts to define
freedom as "is a man’s natural power of doing what he pleases, so far as he is not
prevented by force or law" (Institutes, Book I Title III); amazingly this resembles the
modern definitions of freedom. Justinian set forth the concept of Manumission, which is
giving freedom to a slave, as a rightful thing for the master to free his slave at any time
but by certain terms. He describes slavery and manumission as unnatural laws but were
introduced to normal life by the law of nations, and it is like a necessary evil brought to
life (Institutes Book I Title V). Justinian took good care of delicts and crimes as well, for
property. The penalty of theft differs depending from three to four times the value of the
stolen property whether the thief was a slave or a freeman (Institutes Book IV Title I).
Justinian's insisting on making a civil constitution with solid laws that stood for years
after him came along his desire to restore the old Roman glory. He wanted to make
himself as the great king who restored the land and the order, and in the eyes of many he
is indeed.
Freedom and delicts are only two parts of his institutes. The laws of Justinian
covered almost every aspect in daily life. However those two as will be seen were two
In his secret history, Procopius illustrates Justinian as a fascist and a tyrant who
abused many of the laws he issued. The Secret History was written during Justinian's life
but published after his death, because Procopius feared the deadly fate he would face if
the emperor knew about this book. In terms of justice which the emperor heavily
emphasized on, Procopius tells that Justinian accused many people with crimes they
never committed only to have their property. Judiciary was corrupted in his rule, for it
was used by the close relatives of Justinian for their own benefit, also many criminals
managed to escape their judgment; many wanted unrightfully to take the property of
their neighbors found a way to do so, all thanks to the corrupt system as Procopius
claims. Justinian was also portrayed as a fascist thief who only sought his benefit. As
Procopius explain "Indeed, as soon as this man laid hold of the Government of his
uncle, he straightway was eager to squander the public funds with complete recklessness,
seeing he had become master of them" (Procopius Ch. VIII). Finally, he shows Justinian
as a money squanderer for two reasons mainly, first is that he kept giving frequently large
sums to the Huns who themselves never satiated from the Roman money; not only the
Huns were hungry for money but all barbarians in the north, west, east, and south of the
empire were generously and unrightfully given money by Justinian (Procopius Ch. 19).
Procopius also claims that he bankrupted the empire, with his many senseless buildings
on the sea which he saw as a waste of money. Hagia Sophia was one of the significant
buildings Justinian built, Procopius himself describes it like a majestic artifact "So the
church has become a spectacle of marvelous beauty, overwhelming to those who see it,
but to those who know it by hearsay altogether incredible" (Buildings, Ch. I). Perhaps
Procopius wanted to mention the church with the things that Justinian wasted money on,
but maybe the building even overwhelmed him so he could allow himself to call it a
The reason to doubt the credibility of the Secret History is his insistence to
portray Justinian and his wife Theodora as devils. Especially Theodora, who he wrote
much about her in his book, perhaps more than Justinian, illustrating her as a fiend, a
dictator, and a trickster. This personal focus on Justinian and the empress is a sign of
bias, this perhaps came from the fact the Italian Procopius did not accept the idea of
being ruled by a non-Italian king. Not to mention that some of it may sound like a
history fiction rather than facts and it is much less credible than his other works.
Despite the obvious exaggeration, it can never be said that all of the Secret
History is false. The simplest reason is that if someone wants to understand the situation
he must read from all accounts, surly every account in considered bias but only after long
research the truth may be revealed. Finally, it must be not forgotten that history is
written by the victor, and the truth is told by the brave; so as long as there is no super
reason that might make Procopius write a whole book of fiction to discredit Justinian,
MA: Harvard UP, 1960. LacusCurtius • Procopius — The Secret History. Bill