Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Note Khajan Singh
Case Note Khajan Singh
KHAJAN SINGH
v.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Is there a right to appeal a decision made under Section 18 of the Sexual Harassment of
Women at Workplace Act, 2013?
Important Points:
Precedents from Dinesh Chandra Mishra and Dr. P.S. Malik cases, which have
interpreted the relationship between the Act of 2013 and the Rules of 1965.
The petitioner's argument about the need for an independent judicial body to review
the CLICC's findings, contrasting with the respondents' reliance on administrative
procedures under the Rules of 1965.
The interpretation of Section 18 of the Act of 2013 regarding the right to appeal to a
Court or Tribunal.
The CLICC's report, following allegations of sexual harassment, was submitted to the
Disciplinary Authority, which sought advice from the Union Public Service
Commission (UPSC). The petitioner was given the opportunity to respond to this
advice, and the matter now hinges on whether the internal procedures under the Rules
of 1965 provide adequate recourse as contemplated under the Act of 2013.