Post Moderation of Assessment - NCV & R191#

# to be read together with the DHET ICASS guidelines

PART 1: ASSESSMENT DETAILS

Instructional Offering: FARMING MANAGEMENT Level: N5
Assessment type: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Assessment Date: 19/02/2024
FARMING
Duration: 1 HOUR Total marks: 50

PART 2: MARKING GUIDELINE DISCUSSION

A memo discussion is to take place prior to the marking of the student’s scripts.
Date 22/02/2024 Start Time 14:00
Venue STAFF ROOM End Time 14:30
Attendees 1.DUBE M. 2.MASEMOLA X.W 3.
4. 5. 6.
7. 8. 9.
Minutes of
marking
guideline
discussion
(indicate if
any
adjustments N/A
were made to
the
memorandum)
Moderator
signature

PART 3: POST MODERATION

The following must be completed by the moderator:

After the completion of the marking, moderation needs to take place.
Moderation needs to be 10 % of the scripts (a minimum of 5 scripts) per subject,
per level, per lecturer

Number of students assessed 18

Number of answers sheets/scripts/assignments moderated 5

Students Name or Class Marker’s Moderator’s Comments

ID number group Mark Mark
1 0411056375081 A 56 56 N/A
2 9805250473086 A 46 46 N/A
3 9908220850080 A 86 86 N/A
4 0411166156082 A 52 52 N/A

Document ID Document Owner Revision No. Print Date: Page No.

AS4Y SAO: Curriculum Services 04 2024/06/28 03:02 PM Page 1 of 3
Printed copies are uncontrolled.
 5 0101185567084 A 42 42 N/A
6
7
8
9
10

PART 4: POST MODERATION REVIEW

The following must be completed by the moderator:

 Moderation needs to be 10 % of the scripts (a minimum of 5 scripts) per
subject, per level, per lecturer
 A variation of more than 3 % in the marks will mean that the entire classes
scripts are remarked and re-moderated after marking
 Markers mark is captured on excel, not moderators mark

CRITERIA
Score key: 0=non n/a=not

Moderator
existent applicable
1=partially 2= meets the 3=meets the

Score
meets the requirement in requirements
requirement most regards completely
1. A marking discussion took place to standardise the assessment tool prior to
the commencement of assessment of students’ performance (applicable to
internal examination only)
2. The assessment was in accordance with the assessment plan and the
approved task was used
3. Students were not advantaged/disadvantaged in either/or questions (choice
questions)
4. Alternative answers have been accommodated where relevant and credited
where applicable.
5. All responses have been marked
6. Consistency in the allocation of marks
7. Adherence to marking guideline
8. Students were able to complete the question paper in the stipulated time
9. The marks for the assessment have been totaled correctly
10. The total mark achieved for the assessment has been correctly recorded
on the record sheet (class list)
11. The weighted total mark achieved for the task has been correctly recorded
on the record sheet.
12. The marks were correctly transferred from the students script to the record
sheet
13. The marks were correctly transferred from the record sheet to the excel
template
14. The marks were correctly transferred from the excel template to the MIS
system
15. The lecturer was consistent in the marking of the entire batch of

Document ID Document Owner Revision No. Print Date: Page No.

AS4Y SAO: Curriculum Services 04 2024/06/28 03:02 PM Page 2 of 3
Printed copies are uncontrolled.
 assessments
16. The lecturer provided feedback on each script or evidence of student
corrections on answer script.
17. There is proof of authenticity for all evidence without direct supervision

Yes/no
 The assessment had been adequately pre-moderated
 Are any interventions required? (if so give details on which area)

 Does re-marking of scripts need to occur due to a deviation of more than 3

% between marked and moderated scripts?

 If remarking is need what is the due date for remarking?

____________________

PART 6: AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ASSESSMENT

Diagnostic Analysis and Notes of Recommendations
Question Challenges/Misconceptions Recommendations on
Number improvement for future use

Recommended Areas for Improvement in The Assessment of Performance:

Question Recommended Improvement Motivation
Number

Additional Moderator Comments

Moderator Signature: Date:

Document ID Document Owner Revision No. Print Date: Page No.

AS4Y SAO: Curriculum Services 04 2024/06/28 03:02 PM Page 3 of 3
Printed copies are uncontrolled.