IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF JUDGE MS.

________,
JMIC, _____

IN THE MATTER OF

__________ ……Petitioner

VERSUS

______________________ ……RESPONDENTS

APPLICATION FOR THE DELETION OF NAMES OF RESPONDENT

No. 3 & 4 FROM THE ARRAY OF MEMO OF PARTIES – CASE
NO. COMA/Case No/2020

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the abovesaid case is pending before this

Hon’ble Court and the same is fixed for today.
2. That the Petitioner got married to Respondent No.
1 on (Date) and left the matrimonial home on her
own free will and left 5 months old daughter with
the Respondent 1.
3. That the Respondent No. 3 & 4 are the sister-in-
law and brother-in-law of the petitioner and are
aged about ___ years respectively.
4. That the Respondent No. 3 & 4 have been living
separately in their matrimonial house since their
 marriage held on DATE (Marriage certificate
attached – please refer Annexure 1) and never
shared household hence does not fall under
Section 2 (f), 2(q) & 2(s) of The Protection of
Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
5. That the Respondent No. 3 & 4 have nothing to do
with the allegations leveled by the petitioner
against them and all the allegations leveled by
the petitioner are false and fabricated and there
are no specific allegations against the
Respondent No. 3 & 4 and no relief are claimed by
the petitioner against them.
6. That no specific allegations have been leveled
against the Respondent No. 3 & 4 and no specific
averments have been mentioned and Respondent No.
3 & 4 are implicated just to harass and to fulfil
the ill designs of the present complaint.
7. That it is not believable that Respondent No. 3 &
4 will leave their matrimonial house and come to
reside with the Petitioner just to cause domestic
violence, given they both are full time working
in different state.
8. That it is further submitted that there is a
propensity of Petitioner of domestic violence to
rope in all family members of husband just to put
pressure upon the husband's family to settle the
case. Therefore, respondent has been falsely
implicated in the present domestic violence's
case, even when Petitioner knows that there is no
 domestic relationship between Petitioner and
Respondent No 3 & 4.
9. That the Petitioner falsely dragged Respondent 3
& 4 in another false criminal case registered via
FIR No. _______ under Section 498A, 406, 506, 323
of IPC however no evidences were found against
them (Please refer Annexure 2).
10. That no fruitful purpose would be served if the
Respondent No. 3 & 4 are not deleted from the
array of parties.
In the view of the submissions made above, it is
therefore, most respectfully prayed that the
names of Respondent 3 & 4 may kindly
remove/delete from the array of the parties, in
the interest of Justice.
Place: _______
Date : ________ Respondent 3 &
4
NAMES of
respondents