Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Advances in Sustainable Energy Policy Materials and Devices 1st Edition Yong-Jun Gao Full Chapter Download PDF
Advances in Sustainable Energy Policy Materials and Devices 1st Edition Yong-Jun Gao Full Chapter Download PDF
https://ebookstep.com/product/nudge-theory-in-action-behavioral-
design-in-policy-and-markets-2016-palgrave-advances-in-
behavioral-economics-sherzod-abdukadirov/
https://ebookstep.com/product/advances-in-crop-modelling-for-a-
sustainable-agriculture-1st-edition-kenneth-boote-editor/
https://ebookstep.com/product/investment-and-competitiveness-in-
africa-advances-in-african-economic-social-and-political-
development-diery-seck/
https://ebookstep.com/product/sealy-worthingtons-text-cases-and-
materials-in-company-law-11th-edition-worthington/
■■ ■■■■ Motion Forces and Energy 1st Edition T Griffith
Jones
https://ebookstep.com/download/ebook-51276808/
https://ebookstep.com/product/mortal-engines-03-infernal-
devices-1st-edition-philip-reeve/
Advances in
Sustainable
Energy
Policy, Materials and Devices
Advances in Sustainable Energy
Yong-jun Gao • Weixin Song •
Jingbo Louise Liu • Sajid Bashir
Editors
Advances in Sustainable
Energy
Policy, Materials and Devices
Editors
Yong-jun Gao Weixin Song
Hangzhou Branch of the Zhejiang Department of Materials
Tsinghua Yangtze River Delta University of Oxford
Research Institute Oxford, UK
Clean Energy and Energy Conservation
and Environmental Protection Centre Sajid Bashir
Hangzhou City, China Department of Chemistry
Texas A&M University – Kingsville
Jingbo Louise Liu Kingsville, TX, USA
Texas A&M University – Kingsville
Kingsville, TX, USA
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland
AG 2021
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether
the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of
illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and
transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by
similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication
does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant
protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or
the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any
errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
At the time of starting this book with Springer Nature, I lost my doctorate advisor
(‘academic father’), and at the start of writing for the actual monograph, I lost my
biological father from severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), a ribonucleic acid
encoded virus with a corona geometry. At present SARS is probably the most well-
known phrase and has affected everyone in all sectors of society. “To lose one
parent, Mr. Worthing, may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like
carelessness.”―Oscar Wilde, The Importance of Being Earnest. Like, Mr. Wilde, I
reflect on, where we are as a society.
During this reflection period, when most of us are working remotely, teleconfer-
encing, or are limited in how many people can work in any laboratory, we have to
ask is Sustainable Energy Necessary? and if yes, what is the likely energy production
roadmap over the next five decades?
This monograph aims to address this central thematic question and is split into
several themes, relating to energy generation from coal, hydrogen, thermal heat,
light, electrons, and associated storage to ensure a continuous supply of electricity as
demanded by industry, residual, home and businesses.
The authors cover themes related to the above mission and in this preface as
editors will summarize and expand the scope (1-Bashir) contained within the pages
of this monograph. The first three chapters deal with photocatalysis concerning solar
energy (2- Li/Kong), hybrid nature-derived mimetics (3-Bai/Ran), and the first
principle-based density level theory calculations (4-Tang). The next four chapters
deal with the production of hydrogen or oxygen or their utilization, with clean
hydrogen production technologies (5-Abdullah), from metal hydride (6-Corgnale)
and oxygen reduction using ruthenium electrocatalysts for direct methanol fuel cell
devices (7-Uribe-Godínez) and direct conversion of carbon dioxide to oxygenates
(8-Spivey). We return to the theme of solar energy is respect to solar thermal fluids
thermodynamics (9-Kalita), modeling (10-Fox/Bashir), and electrolysis (11-Haik).
v
vi Preface
The theme of energy storage is dealt with in the next two chapters with a focus on
transition metal-based electrochemical storage (12-Huda) and an emphasis on mixed
vanadium oxides (13-Li). We then explore an application of certain metal oxides in
the form of metal-organic frameworks for water adsorption (14-Wang), advanced
materials for supercapacitors (15-He), or metal layered two-dimensional MXenes for
electrochemical storage as a departure from traditional metal oxides, addressed
earlier in the monograph (16-Luo). The role of solid-electrolyte in high-density
lithium-ion batteries is discussed next (17-Qiao) and the modern characterization
approach to better understand energy materials is further explored as a standalone
topic for X-ray energy (18-Tan/Shearing) or advanced transmission electron
microscopy(19-Robertson). We then break the next segment to discuss clean coal
(20-Meyer), coal and biomass gasification (21-Guan), energy from lignocellulosic
materials (22-El-Azazy/Shibl), and how these materials can be used for sustainable
development. Two examples are used to illustrate this approach. The role of Munic-
ipal solid waste incineration (23-Quina) and carbon sugars as fuels for microbial fuel
cells, both theory and actual practice is extensively reviewed (24-Liu). The last
segment policy, energy materials and electrification in china in two perspectives, one
from the application of artificial intelligence in the monitoring of smart devices and
applications such as electric vehicles (25-Gao) and the application of blockchain,
smart devices and photovoltaic/wind/hydrogen stored energy in a delocalized grid as
a framework for renewables energy (26-Gao) and the monograph ends with a general
review of themes covered by one of our editors (27-Song) with the back matter
subject index.
All authors justify the role of energy storage or application of sustainable energy
to lessen the influence of carbon dioxide that is derived from the combustion of coal
to generate electricity. Fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas are the mainstay for
electricity generation both within the United States and globally as observed in
figure 1, however at the cost of reliable and relatively cheap electricity from coal is
the expense of emissions from soluble oxides of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur, as well
as particulate matter. This has an environmental cost associated with it and will
contribute towards respiratory distress, which in turn will enhance the susceptibility
of a slice of the population towards SARS. Lastly, should carbon be used to generate
thermal heat or used to manufacture materials, drugs, plastics, paints and other useful
resources is a question that is being asked to generate a circular economy where
waste is minimized and each atom is utilized, a form of conversation of matter?.
The authors within this monograph highlight a few of the approaches that are
currently under development at the technical level of attainment. The review and
case studies are broad because the challenges are diverse, such as the development of
clean biofuels for aviation, transportation and heating and cooling, waste to energy
conversion technologies, a value-added material transformation from waste and life
cycle assessment. On the proceedings page, we as the editorial team will further
develop some areas that we consider emerging and pivotal towards the development
of strategies to engineering a future with zero carbon emissions and cheaper energy
resources that are sustainable.
Preface vii
ix
x Contents
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 847
About the Editors
δ Delta
α Elevation Angle
λ Wavelength
Φ Polarization Potential
θ Theta
Φfb Flat Band Potential
ΔT Charging/ Discharging Cycle Time
φ Latitude Of The Collector
(A)ZIB (Aqueous) Zinc Ion Batteries
abs Absorption
AC Activated Carbon
ACN Acetonitrile
AFC Alkaline Fuel Cell
AOR Alcohol Oxidation Reaction
ASU Air Separation Unit
ATR Auto-thermal Reforming of Methane
BFB Bubbling Fluidized Bed
BP Black Phosphorus
CAES Compressed Air Energy Storage
CB Conduction Band
CBM Conduction Band Minimum
CCS Carbon Capture and Storage
CCS CO2 Capture and Storage
CCT Clean Coal Technology
CE Coulombic Efficiency
CFB Circulating Fluidized Bed
CFS Capacitive Faradic Storage
CH Helmholtz layer capacitance
CHP Combined Heat, and Power
CLG Chemical Looping Gasifier
CNF Carbon Nanofibers
xvii
xviii Abbreviations
Sajid Bashir, Sai Chava, Weixin Song, Yong-jun Gao, and Jingbo Louise Liu
To achieve this conversation of mass principle where atoms are converted from one
form to another, waste heat and energy should be recaptured and retasked, and
converted to value-added materials. As is known in freshmen chemistry, one mole of
carbon generates one mole of carbon dioxide, using methane as an example. Coal
S. Bashir (*)
Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, USA
e-mail: br9@tamuk.edu
S. Chava
Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, USA
Emergent Biosolutions, San Diego, CA, USA
e-mail: sairaghuveer@gmail.com
W. Song
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
e-mail: weixin.song@materials.ox.ac.uk
Y.-j. Gao
Center for Clean Energy and Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection, Zhejiang
Yangtze River Delta, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
Sunshine Times Law Firm, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
e-mail: gggycpp@sina.com
J. L. Liu
Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, USA
Texas A&M Energy Institute, College Station, TX, USA
e-mail: kfjll00@tamuk.edu; jingbo.liu@tamu.edu
Fig. 1.1 Summary of energy generation by nuclear, petroleum distillates, and renewable resources
(left-axis) and fossil fuels (Coal, and Natural Gas, right axis; [2–6])
1 Promising Clean Energy Development: Practice, Challenges, and Policy. . . 3
Crisis and to lower carbon dioxide emissions. We are in the third type of transition to
a more sustainable form of generating energy [7].
A levelized cost of electricity from different energy resources by the Institute of
Energy Research suggests that retrofit of current coal and gas power plants to extend
their useless operating lifespans by 15 years could yield near-zero carbon dioxide
emissions as the most reliable and cheapest form of energy production. Under such a
scenario, soluble oxide of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur are captured and carbon
dioxide is stored in geological sites suited for long-term storage [8]. The current
general-purpose analyses reported in the literature fail to connect the levelized cost
of energy to the reduction of particulate matter, solid oxides of carbon, nitrogen, and
sulfur, and second the cost to implement these technologies and their lifecycle
energy and emission [9]. This we believe is necessary before the first step before
an environmental roadmap can be fully developed and deployed [10] (Fig. 1.2).
In the area of energy capture and recycling, that waste to biofuels will take an
increasing role in the next 50 years as a necessary aid to transition away from the
utilization of coal for the generation of electricity. There are two broad reasons: One,
these resources currently exist, do not need to be mined or extracted but are
generated as a result of industrial, agricultural, and process chemistries, and are
essential ‘lost’ to the economy. If these resources can be integrated, waste is
minimized, and the extracted energy can be applied to the grid [13]. Second, the
‘lost energy’ is currently ‘replaced’ by coal and natural gas and this will enable lesser
dependence on coal. Examples of atom-conversion are the generation of biofuels
Fig. 1.2 Summary of emissions of common volatiles and particulate matter (left axis) and the price
of natural gas and coal on a megawatt-hour basis (right axis; [11, 12])
4 S. Bashir et al.
from nonfood feedstocks, such as nonedible seed oil, wood chips, grape marc,
chicken/cow manure, fruit peel, rotten plant matter, or recycling of municipal solid
waste by a thermal process, followed by aerobic respiration, fractionation using a
biorefinery process to generate bioethanol and char. These could be supported using
clay-based heterogeneous catalysis and a porous metal–organic framework to cap-
ture and store biogas [14–15].
Where the carbon source is lignocellulose biomass, the typical pretreatment is
acid wash and digestion; alkaline hydrogen peroxide application may also achieve
similar goals with lower energy balance and lesser useless by-products. Under such a
scenario, lignocellulose biomass is pretreated with hydrogen peroxide [16]. As
hydrogen peroxide has a greater oxidative potential than sulfuric acid, longer
incubation periods may yield phenomenologically similar results in terms of
delignation followed by hydrolysis described by Eq. 1.1:
E : H2 O2 þ 2Hþ þ 2e ! 2H2 O, E ¼ 1:78 V vs:S2 O8 2 þ 2e
! 2SO4 2 , E : 2:01 V ð1:1Þ
The life-cycle assessment should account for environmental, economic, and techni-
cal parameters in the application of any energy production platform, summarized in
Fig. 1.3.
Examples of environmental parameters include generation of global warming
potential, acid rain and acidification potential, eutrophication potential, and cumu-
lative energy demand. In the area of economy, the unit cost per megawatt-hour,
operational life-cycle, infrastructure costs, and power plant operational costs
1 Promising Clean Energy Development: Practice, Challenges, and Policy. . . 5
including the cost of decommissioning and the technical parameters are the cost of
feedstocks, generating capacity, generating reliability, technological maturity of the
proposed process, and transmission and storage potential. An example of the above
approach is when an analysis of electrical storage is conducted on the ‘short-term’ (<
1 min), ‘medium-term’ (~ 270 min), or ‘long-term’ (> 130,000 min). By using the
general equation to determine the levelized cost of electricity as described by
Eqs. 1.2 and 1.3:
where
1 ð1 þ itsÞ1
AF ¼ , ð1:3Þ
its
Fig. 1.4A Summary of energy storage by the form of storage (Mechanical, electrical, chemical, or
thermal in nature, [20])
3
Pump Hydro Medium-term Storage
2.5 Compressed Air Energy Medium-term Storage
LCOE (LOG Skwh)
Fig. 1.4B Summary of LCOE for different systems for fast, medium, and long-term energy
retrieval on a log basis with area based on modal value. (Data from Table 3.4 of [11, 19])
per day for 1 year and cost factors from [19] (Data from Table 3.4 of [19 and
Appendices of 11]) and results summarized in Fig. 1.4A by energy type, Fig. 1.4B
by LCOE and Table 1.1 [51].
1 Promising Clean Energy Development: Practice, Challenges, and Policy. . . 7
Table 1.1 Summary of different storage systems in terms of power, specific energy, efficiency,
discharge capacity, the response time (fast is seconds to minutes), lifetimes (years or discharge
cycles), stability in self-discharge tendency, storage costs, power conversion system (PCS) cost, and
balance of plant (BOP) associated costs [21]
Specific
Power energy Efficiency Discharge at Response
Storage technology (MW) (Wh/kg) (%) capacity (h) time
Pumped hydro storage 100–5000 0.5–1.5 65–80 1–24 Fast
Conventional com- 5–3000 30–60 41–75 1–24 Fast
pressed air energy
storage
Lead acetate (nickel 0–40 30–50 (45– 70–80 (60– 1–5 ¼ cycle
cadmium, if different) 80) 80) (6–8)
Lithium ion 0.015–50 75–200 65–88 0.017–2 ¼ cycle
Hydrogen 0–50 400–1000 35–42 12 ¼ cycle
Thermal 50–250 80–200 14–18 1–24 Fast
Storage technology Lifetime Self-dis- Storage PCS ($/kW) BOP cost
(cycles, k) charge/day cost ($/kW)
(%) ($/kWh)
Pumped hydro storage 15 k Low 5–136 403–4644 3–30
Conventional com- 10 k Low 2–141 432–1674 3–30
pressed air energy
storage
Lead acetate (nickel 0.25–1.5 0.1–5 132–915 211–648 46–140
cadmium, if different) (1.5–3.0) (0.2–0.3) (609– (281–355) (76–130)
1210)
Lithium-ion 0.6–1.2 1–5 282–4104 161–4320 0–130
Hydrogen 0.1–1.0 Low 2–15 540–4809 11–43
Thermal 5– 0.05–1 0.059– 1–50 (kJ/kg/ 59–101
15 years 0.101 K)
Sources: For Pumped Hydro and Compressed Air Storage: [19, 20, 22–24]. For lead acetate storage:
[25–29]. For lithium-ion storage: [24, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32]. For hydrogen Storage: [20, 22, 24, 26,
33–35]. For thermal Storage: [24, 36–38]. For levelized costs of electricity and lifetime cost
analysis: [22, 29, 39–50, 122]
The analysis using the LCOE equation demonstrates that Li-ion batteries and
advanced adiabatic and isothermal compressed air energy storage as suitable energy
storage platforms with low levelized costs and high reliability, whereas under a
medium time scale, pumped hydro and advanced adiabatic compressed air or energy
storage or thermal storage using molten salts or mineral oil and long-term power to
gas to power or pumped hydro, where hydrogen or methane is used to generate
electricity. The electricity would be generated using a combined cycle power plant or
proton exchange membrane fuel cells [52, 53].
8 S. Bashir et al.
Energy storage is required to enable constant power load and is driven by pumped
hydro as the historically largest share form of energy storage, with lithium-ion
batteries being a recent addition due to the rise of both solar and wind power. No
lifetime assessment cycle reviewed encompasses all the required parameters, how-
ever, parameters that drive cost and applicability are a lifetime of storage technology,
the efficiency of energy retrieval, and cycle length and depend on end-usage, with
lithium-ion batteries gaining a significant share in all stationary applications due to
greater research and development as a result of increased uptake of solar and wind as
sustainable energy resources. For long-term storage and high-need applications,
pumped hydro, compressed air, hydrogen and thermal energy storage are likely to
increase due to stricter emissions standards for automobiles, fuel cells driven trans-
port is now feasible, utilizing zeolite-based heterogeneous catalysts, for example,
bismuth vanadate as an intermediate bandgap photocatalyst that could be coupled
solar to photocatalysis through recombination of photoinduced electrons and holes
to generate hydrogen from water or coal [54, 55].
While the last two decades have seen a dramatic rise in solar and wind energy
generation resources, the future most likely will look toward a hybrid system where
energy storage will play an increasingly prominent role coupled with clean coal and
carbon dioxide capture. Figure 1.5 shows a conceptual workflow of how this could
be accomplished.
The energy generation resource such as a photovoltaic array, wind-powered
turbine, solar concentrator to steam to turbine, or hydrogen feed gas will need to
generate electricity, store it and then allow the system to utilize the stored energy.
This will be done using inverters, and heat pumps, and a direct current (DC) bus,
using a DC-to-DC converter and DC bus connection to alternating current (AC) bus
using inverters and the electricity or lead load connected to the AC bus. In this
manner, energy is drawn with surplus energy used to recharge the secondary or flow
batteries or electrolyzes to generate hydrogen from water, if the load is more than the
immediate power, then the energy from the stored batteries can be tapped or stored
hydrogen to generate electricity with the excess heat used to assist with steam
generation. Currently, approximately 2=3 of the total annualized cost is due to
components from the wind-powered turbine and the rest for batteries, inverters,
and hydrogen storage systems, and fuel cells. The fuel cell catalyst is the next
greatest expense and is likely to decrease as more research and development is
geared toward the automobile and residential energy sectors, where the likelihood of
supercapacitor, battery, flex-fuel, and fuel cells are used or some combination for
automobile and stationary applications [57–59].
The rapid development in alkali-metal-based batteries is driven by chemical and
physical characteristics of lithium and sodium and this is related to atomic radii,
electron affinity, and charge density, from which energy density and kinetics of
energy release are derived:
e.g. 6.9 atomic mass unit, amu per mole, 0.76 Å, 180.5 C, 3.0 V, 3860 mAg.g1 and
$5 k for lithium, Li vs. 23 amu, 1.06 Å, 97.7 C, 2.7 V 1160 mAg.g1 and $0.15 k
for sodium, Na.
The molar mass is in atomic mass units, cation radii in Angstroms, melting point
in degrees Celsius, voltage relative to standard hydrogen electrode in volts, the
energy density in milliampere hour per gram, and cost of carbonate salt on a ton
basis in United States dollars, thousand increments, respectively. These energy
parameters favor lithium-ion batteries, while environmental and economic factors
favor sodium ion-based batteries [60]. A bifurcated role is likely with lithium-ion
batteries being favored in automobiles where high energy density and fast kinetics
are required and sodium-ion batteries for stationary energy storage where high
density is not required, such as buildings or a configuration shown in Fig. 1.5 [61].
The near-future bottleneck to battery and fuel cell development is the electrocatalysts
and electrode architecture, which will ultimately define high gravi- and volumetric
energy densities at the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer that limits spontaneous
reactions at the expense of thermodynamic instability and lower cell lifetime, which may
be accomplished through alloying, described in Eqs. 1.4 and 1.5 [62]:
E þ yAþ þ xē ! Ay M, ð1:4Þ
where A represents alkali metals Li or Na and E represent metalloids Si, Ge, Sn, Sb,
and P, respectively, or conversion [63]:
where M.O are metal oxides and A is alkali metals (Li or Na) such as Silicon-based
anodes with Li iron phosphate batteries, e.g. Li17Si4.
10 S. Bashir et al.
How could such an economy work in principle? Where would the hydrogen be
generated? Currently, hydrogen production, approximately 48% from natural gas,
30% from Naphtha and Oils, and 18% from coal [28] or biomass. When fossil fuels
are the feedstock, hydrogen production can be accomplished by hydrocarbon
reforming, pyrolysis. Reforming from hydrocarbons can be accomplished by
steam reforming, partial oxidation, and autothermal reforming. When generated
from biomass, this may be by bio photolysis, dark or photo fermentation, if thermo-
chemical, by pyrolysis, gasification, combustion or liquefaction, and from water
splitting as indicated in Fig. 1.5. Here, electrolysis, thermolysis, and photolysis
1 Promising Clean Energy Development: Practice, Challenges, and Policy. . . 11
could be utilized. The advantages of hydrogen are in its high energy density when
compared with carbon-based fuels, as shown in Table 1.2 and workflow in Fig. 1.6.
Hydrogen production by steam reformation is nickel catalytic conversion of
hydrocarbons and steam to form hydrogen and carbon oxide through a series of
sequential steps, which result in the synthesis of gas (syngas), water-gas shift, and
methanation or gas purification. The feed is light hydrocarbons or naphtha; however,
the materials need to be carbon and hydrogen to avoid poisoning of the catalyst. If
the coal or feed contains sulfur, a desulfurization step is performed [69] at 3.5 MPa
and 900 C temperature using a 3:5 ratio of steam to carbon [70]. The heat is
recovered and the channel promotes the water gas shift reaction, where carbon
monoxide reacts with steam to produce hydrogen gas and is purified through a
pressure swing adsorption [71] at the expense of carbon dioxide emission, which
could be captured using supercritical conditions and the liquefied carbon dioxide
stored in geological reservoirs. Alternately, the carbon dioxide could be reacted with
hydrogen to generate wet methane [72]. This methane is re-fed back to the reformer
to generate additional hydrogen. The different gases could be separated using
Pd-based Inorganic membranes with high selectivity and at lower operational
temperatures (550 C) lowering the cost of hydrogen production to $2.0 kg with
Carbon dioxide capture and storage [73] described by the steam reformation, water-
gas shift reaction, or methanation described in Eqs. 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8:
Partial oxidation is a similar method but using oxygen instead of air and occurs at
around 1315 C for the non-catalytic process using coal, oils, or methane [71]. The
12
Fig. 1.6 Workflow process to produce hydrogen using ten (〇!〇) distinct processes. Each unique process and the pathway are indicated using a numbered
sequence. For example, hydrogen production by Steam reforming is shown by the process 〇, membrane separation by the process ❷, coal gasification by 〇,
biomass-based processes are shown by sequences 〇,〇 and〇. Thermo-photo- or electrolysis processes by sequences 〇,〇,〇, and 〇. CRA represents carbon-
rich acids, CBP Carbon By-products; Pe the electrical energy, HeTF Heat Transfer Fluids, HiTHeE High-temperature Heat Exchanger [68]
S. Bashir et al.
1 Promising Clean Energy Development: Practice, Challenges, and Policy. . . 13
feed gas or materials are oxidized directly, or sulfur is removed, and oxygen is used
to partially oxidize hydrocarbons and syngas in a similar workflow to the steam
reformation for the catalytic process conducted at lower operating temperatures
summarized in Eqs. 1.9, 1.10, 1.11 and 1.12 [74]:
Catalytic Reformer : Cn Hm ðgÞ þ ½nO2 ðgÞ ! nCO ðgÞ þ ½mH2 ðgÞ ð1:9Þ
Non catalytic : Cn Hm ðg=lÞ þ nH2 O ðg=lÞ
! nCO ðgÞ þ ðn þ ½mÞH2 ðgÞ ð1:10Þ
WGS : CO ðgÞ þ H2 O ðg=lÞ ! CO2 ðgÞ þ H2 ðgÞ ð1:11Þ
Methanator : CO ðgÞ þ 3H2 ðgÞ ! CH4 ðgÞ þ H2 O ðlÞ ð1:12Þ
Because coal has lower hydrogen to carbon ratio than methane, higher pressure
and temperature are required (6 MPa and 1315 C), generating non-reactant ash and
more water [75].
The above two processes are endothermal and require additional energy input, for
autothermal reformation; the initial oxidation is exothermal, and the thermal energy
is used to drive the endothermal steam reforming process to drive hydrogen produc-
tion. The oxidizer is steam, oxygen, or air as the inlet gas to the reformer to drive the
reformation and oxidation reactions to occur [76], summarized in Eq. 1.13:
Cn Hm ðlÞ þ ½nH2 O ðlÞ þ ¼nO2 ðgÞ ! nCO ðgÞ þ ð½n þ ½mÞH2 ðgÞ ð1:13Þ
Because part of the thermal energy is utilized, the overall energy demand is lesser
than the before processes, lowering the cost of production. Methane conversion to
hydrogen could be separated using a Pd membrane and could be accomplished at
lower temperatures than the non-catalytic reaction when the air was used, approx-
imately 900 C, that has to be tuned to the operating parameters of the inorganic
membrane, as a higher temperature may lead to membrane deformation and loss of
selectivity of hydrogen [77].
Hydrocarbon pyrolysis is the breakdown of hydrocarbons to hydrogen via a
thermocatalytic breakdown to carbon and hydrogen at the boiling point of the liquid
hydrocarbons. When heavy oil hydrocarbons are utilized, the decomposition tem-
perature is higher around 350 C to promote gasification of the hydrocarbon
followed by cracking or the methane to hydrogen gas as a form of decarbonization
at under 1000 C and 1 atm pressure. Pyrolysis is a gasification process and does not
involve a water gas shift or carbon dioxide absorption step. The hydrogen gas is
separated using Pd-Ag alloyed membrane at lower temperatures to avoid damage to
the membrane, the rate of separation is dependent upon the partial pressure of the
incoming gas, noting that the gas needs to be devoid of sulfur to avoid catalytic
poisoning [78].
Hydrogen gas can also be formed using biomass, where the cellulose lignin-based
materials can be converted to methanol, sugars that were generated from carbon
dioxide, and sunlight known as photosynthesis. The carbon biomass is then
14 S. Bashir et al.
In biomass gasification, the biomass is converted into syngas using air, oxygen, or
steam at 1400 C and 32 atm:
Biomass ðs=lÞ þ Steam ðg=lÞ ! H2 ðgÞ þ CO2 ðgÞ þ CO ðgÞ þ CH4 ðgÞ
þ Cn Hm ðlÞ þ H2 O ðlÞ þ char ðsÞ
þ tar ðsÞ ð1:17Þ
C6 H12 O6 ðsÞ þ 2H2 O ðlÞ ! CH3 ðCH2 Þ2 COOH ðCRAÞðlÞ þ 2H2 ðgÞ
þ 2CO2 ðgÞ ðfermentationÞ ð1:22Þ
Cellulose/Starch are the common bio feed stocks and fermentation is carried out
at mild acidic conditions in the dark. When sunlight is used, nitrogenase can convert
CRA (e.g. acetic acid) into hydrogen and carbon dioxide, summarized in Eq. 1.23
[81]:
1 Promising Clean Energy Development: Practice, Challenges, and Policy. . . 15
CH3 COOH ðlÞ þ 2H2 O ðlÞ þ hv ! 4H2 ðgÞ þ 2CO2 ðgÞ ð1:23Þ
C6 H12 O6 ðsÞ þ 2H2 O ðlÞ ! 2CH3 COOH ðlÞ þ 2CO2 ðgÞ þ 4H2 ðgÞ ð1:24Þ
2CH3 COOH ðsÞ þ 4H2 O ðlÞ þ hv ! 8H2 ðgÞ þ 4CO2 ðgÞ ð1:25Þ
The electrolysis can be accomplished using fuel cells such as proton exchange
membrane fuel cells, solid oxide electrolysis cells, where they generate proton
migrates across a membrane to the cathode to generate hydrogen, leaving water
and oxygen [86, 87]. In the solid oxide electrolyzer operated under alkaline condi-
tions, water is broken down to H+ and OH, with the hydroxide traveling through the
aqueous electrolyte to the anode to form oxygen [88], with the driving energy being
thermal instead of electrical in a fuel cell, with hydrogen in the steam feed and using
fuel cells described by Eqs. 1.27, 1.28, 1.29 and 1.30 [89]:
Alkaline Solid Oxygen Electrolyzer (Anode).
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.