Objective and scope.

This report describes the work carried out to determine the type of foundation and the
structural system to be used. Calculations are presented to determine the amount of
reinforcing steel in concrete elements and their dimensions.
The works cover the following aspects:

• Determination and description of the structural system.

• Load analysis of the used system.
• Earthquake design.
• Review of resistance limit states.
• Review of service limit states.
General description of the building.
to. General characteristics of the building.
1. General structural description.
Foundation

The proposed foundation is based on isolated footings planted at a depth of two meters (2.00
m) and given for the concrete columns.

All the columns were conceived as embedded in their base so there will be transfer of
moments to the foundation, these moments will be absorbed by the counterbeams and the
footings will work only under axial loads.

The materials to be used are the following:

> Conventional class II concrete with minimum simple compression resistance f'c = 100
kg/cm 2 only for the template.
> Class I structural concrete with minimum simple compression resistance f'c = 250
kg/cm 2 .
2 2
> Reinforcing steel with yield strength fy = 4,200 kg/cm (rebar) and fy = 2,530 kg/cm
(wire rod)
> 18 gauge annealed wire.

Structure

The projected structural system consists of a light type roof based on 22 gauge “pintro
zintro” type corrugated sheet of curved type (wonder type) with up to
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 1 of 18

20 cm. Variable cant and base between 20 cm. And the 61 cms. To cover an
approximate span of 20 meters by the self-sustaining of its arch shape, together
forming a barrel vault system, which will be supported at its ends by a concrete beam
that in turn will serve as a rain gutter, which will It will have a variable cant. The
columns will be placed between themselves @ 8.33 meters. And 8.06 meters. Where
the construction joints are located, accounting for a total of 12 columns per side to give
a total distance of 74.97 meters. which correspond to the long side of the polygon to be
covered by the dome that forms a regular rectangle of 19.35 meters. These being the
structural dimensions of the plan projection from the centers of gravity of the sections
of the strut profiles.
The proposed foundation is made up of isolated concrete footings f'c= 250 kg/cm2
reinforced with steel rods, this footing will be planted on a screeding template of poor
concrete f'c= 100 kg/cm2.

Standards Used

Regulations of the federal district department

ntc complementary technical standards.
ACI american concrete institute.
Cfe. Wind design.
It is understood that all regulations are in force and are the latest edition.

Specifications – materials used.

Structural steel (at 36):

Creep resistance fy = 2 500 kg/cm2.(grade 36)
Modulus of elasticity e = 2,000,000 kg/cm2.
poisson module u = 0.30
Plain steel (astm a-615)
Creep resistance fy = 4 200 kg/cm2.
Modulus of elasticity e = 2,100,000 kg/cm2.
Plates (36)
Creep resistance fy = 2 500 kg/cm2.(grade 36)
Modulus of elasticity e = 2,000,000 kg/cm2.

Steel:
Metal arches: fy = 36 ksi
fu = 58 ksi
Corrugated: fy = 4200 kg/cm2.
Load analysis.

Loading states.
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 2 of 18

Dead load: the value of the dead loads used includes the self-weight of the structural elements
such as: arches, girders, columns, plates, etc.
Weight of false ceiling 10kg/m2.
Accessories 5kg/m2
Luminaires 10kg/m2
Curved sheet coverage 10 kg/m2

Live load: the live load value used is 10 or 30 kg/m2. (coverage) and 500 kg/m2. (catwalks)

Lateral loads: wind loads w.

The structure will be considered for the design according to its importance, as that of type “b” and
according to its response to the action of the wind, as that of type 2.

Earthquake design
The earthquake design for the project was carried out based on the recommendations of the Civil
Works Design Manual, earthquake design chapter of the CFE. Due to the geometry of the
structure, it was decided to consider a seismic behavior factor Q=2, and to consider the most
unfavorable case, the ductility reduction factor Q' will be considered equal to Q.

The selected analysis method is dynamic analysis. The software used for the structural analysis of
the project in which dynamic seismic analysis is included is RAM Elements, which uses a finite
element model to calculate the mechanical elements acting on the structural members.

The seismic design spectrum was obtained from the CFE PRODISIS program. The illustration
shows the seismic design spectrum.
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 3 of 18

WIND DESIGN

The wind design for the project was carried out based on the recommendations of the CFE Wind
Design Manual in its 2008 version. A return period of 50 years was considered. The figure shows
an isotach map for said return period in which, if the project location is located, we have a speed
that ranges between 90 and 110 km/hr, for The worst case scenario was a gust speed of 110
km/hr.
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 4 of 18

ISOTACH MAP FOR A RETURN PERIOD OF 50 YEARS.

The following table shows a summary of the base dynamic pressure calculation:

Category= 2.000
Height where you want to know the design speed (m) = 7.800 m
α= 0.128
c= 1.000
Exposure factor (Frz)= 0.969
Topography factor (F T )= 1.000 See Table
Burst speed (V R )= 133.000 km/h
Design speed (V D )= 128.84 km/h
Height above sea level (h above sea level) = 1566.000 m
Barometric pressure (Ω)= 630.380 mmHg
Average temperature ( τ )= 20.900 °C
Correction factor for temperature and height (G)= 0.841
Base dynamic pressure (q z )= 66.99 kg/ m2
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 5 of 18
Cover profile dimensions

. Modulus of elasticity 2.1 X 10^6 kg/cm2.

• This sheet is manufactured in accordance with ASTM A-792 and A-653 grade
standards.
37.
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 6 of 18
• Maximum work effort 1,560 kg/cm2.
Design criteria and methods according to the "Manual of Cold Rolled Steel Structural
Members" edited by American Iron and Steel Institute, 1986.

Design of reinforced concrete components. Metal structure (roof and cover) .

Curved blade review.

For the review and in order to more easily calculate the arch, we assume an arch with three joints
to give a static solution with the application of a uniformly distributed load to obtain the reactions
produced by the loads on the supports.
To facilitate the calculation, a clearance of 20.00 meters will be considered.

q = 690 KG/ML

The support reactions are obviously oblique, therefore each of them will have two components
(horizontal and vertical) so the unknowns whose value we will have to find are four.

Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
 Page 7 of 18

Calculation of the vertical components of the reactions (va;y;vb)

Va=vb by symmetry
Va=vb=(qxl)/2 = (690x20)/2 = 6 900 kg.
Calculation of the horizontal components of the reactions (ha;y;hb)
Ha=hb; for it to be fulfilled: σfx=0
-(hax4.25) + (6 900x10) - (690x10x5) =0; -4.25ha+69 000-34 500=0
Ha = (34,500-69,000)/4.25 = 8,117.64 kg.
Hb = -8 117.64 kg.
Calculation of the bending moment in the quarter of the span:
Mf1=(6 900x5)-(8 117.64x4.25)-(690x5x2.5)=34 500-34 499.97-8 625=-8 625 kg-m

TABLE OF THEORETICAL WEIGHTS X M2

CALIBER plug mm kgm2

ARC LENGTH FOR SELF-SUPPORTING SYSTEMS

CLEAR ARROW % REGARDING THE ARC SPAN (mts)

mts 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
20 22.07 23.18 24.49 26.00 27.66 29.47 31.41

The sheet is 22 gauge so the own weight of the sheet for the length of the arch is 22.07 meters.
With an approximate 20% deflection, therefore the own weight per curved sheet will be:
22.07x8.33=183.84 kg, as the width is 0.61 more. The number of sheets that fit in the distance
between columns is: 8.33/0.61=13.65 sheets, therefore the tributary own weight for each two props
is: 13.65x183.84=2,509.41 kg.
If we consider a live load of 40 kg/m2. We would have a total load of:
22.07x40x13.65=12,050.22 kg.
The ultimate load: wu=1.2wd + 1.6wl = (1.2x 2,509.41) + (1.6x12,050.22)=22,291.64 kg
The load per linear meter to be considered will be: 22,291.64/22.07=1,010.04 kg/ml
The load per linear meter for the gutter beam will be:
15 102.25/5.867=2 574.10 kg/ml
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 8 of 18

Considering the gutter as a doubly embedded beam, the maximum bending moment at the
supports would be:
Mf= (wl 2 )/12 = (2 574.10x 5.867 2 )/12 =7 391.29 kg-m.
Therefore, the following section of monolithically cast concrete beam-gutter is proposed.
In order to reduce the bending moment that induces the “kick” of the arch-roof, it is recommended
to use a 1/2" diameter round made of a-36 steel, as a bracing element that practically eliminates
the kink in a certain percentage so that the column absorbs the remainder. The kick that the round
will absorb is: f=axft=1.27x2 039=2582 kg

ARCH CEILING CAL.

22

2#3 METAL PLATE ( 3

6"x6"x 3
16 " STEEL
TO • 7#5 ( ") 5
8

8#3 (38")
ITS T. 1/4" @20cm. ° 4#3 ( 8")
3
f'c = 250 kg/cm 2

0.10 (Class I)
TMA 19mm fy =
4,200 kg/cm 2

0.30 0.40
E#3 @ 20cm
N,%
N ________________________________
ITS T. 3/8" @30cm.
V 1)
\44„
0.70
\ .- /. .
\ i 4
ROUND TENSIONER 5/8"

. z 0.50 z EXPANSION SCREWS 3

8 "x3 1
2 "
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 9 of 18

The Beam Design Correct

Correctly

Calculating the MR with compression steel by trial and error

As = 5.97 2cm Ace - A's = -1.99

A's = 7.96 2cm dd' = 62
13.93 2cm
a= -0.98 cm
d' 4 cm
= Review of creep of steel in compression
P= 0.00181
p' 0.00241
=
A's = 7.96cm dd' = 62
2
13.93cm
a= -0.98cm
d' = 4cm
Review of creep of steel in compression
p= 0.00181
p' = 0.00241

-0.00060 > 0.00209

MR = 1365342.132kgcm
13.65342132 Ton m Happens

Calculating the MR without compression steel by trial and error

P=i 0.00181
q=i 0.044695187
M2=: 1456111.192 kg cm
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 10 of 18

Allowable deflections
Beam Guy Clear [cm] Allowable deflection [cm]
Keep going Type 2 833 2.035416667

Immediate deflections in continuous beams

E concrete = 221359.44kg/cm

11 = oicm4 extreme section Discontinuous

12 = 120508. 6099 4cm extreme section Keep going

13 = 120508.6099 4cm Center section

I= 120508.6099 4cm

M, = 922024.5536 kg cm
= 806771.4344 kg cm

M, = 1290834.375 kg cm

Shear design

Total cant [h] = 60 cm

Clear [L] = 475 cm
% reinforcement [p] = 0.00342
lhe 7.916666667

F,= 0.8

Effective cant [d] 56cm

Base [b] 30 cm
f*c = 200 kg/cm
# of footboard rod 2.5
Footboard area = 0.49 cm2

fve 4200 kg/cm 2

1.5Frbd(f*c)N(1/2)= 28510.55 kg

2.5Frbd(f*c)A(1/2)= 47517.58
h <= 70cm L/h >5 p< 0.015
Happens Happens Happens

VeR = 5100.22
kg
v= 13360.13578 kg
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 11 of 18
h<=70cm L/h>5 p<0.015

Happens Happens Happens

VCR - 5100.22
kg
Vu= 13360.13578 kg

Voodo 12456.55172 kg
o=
Vut > VCR VUD > VCR VU <=2.5Frbd(f*c)A(1/2)
Happens Happens Happens

yes 22.32 cm
=
s, = 25.07 cm
s■—
* min 28.00 cm

COLUMN DESIGN

Materials
faith 7k
Concrete 250 g/cm
= 7k
f*c = 200 g/cm
f'c = 170 g /cm 2k
Steel fye 4200 7
kg/cm
Flexion factor Fr = 0.8

Eccentricities

Eg- 31.05 cm

£e 7.58 cm

Minimum £= 3.25 cm

DESIGN DATA
Shear = 13737.24 kg
Py= 185005.7 kg
Factor Fr 0.8
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 12 of 18

Minimum Steel As = 14.29 cm2 Happens

2
Maxima Steel As = 180.00 cm Happens

Initial proposed steel amount ________p = 0.06 As = 195 cm 3 p 0.00702 q 0.17332

Proposal of rods for assembly No. of the Rod___6 6 Minimum separation between rods _1.5 ip
_______________________________ Rod =________2.85cm
No. of Rod 4 4 1.5 • Aggregate = 3.81cm
_________________As = 11.4011.40 cm 3 d Va r 4.00 cm
_________________1.9 1.9cm Separation (s) = 4.00 cm
d Added 2.54 cm
___________Ace Total = 22.80_______________cm z p=
0.0070

Stirrups Separation between stirrups

No, Stirrup = 3 850/(fy)A0.5*4var.____________24.92 cm
__________c|j Stirrup =______0.95cm _________As= 48*• stirrups 45.60 cm
__________0.71_____________ 0.5*Men. dim. cabbage. 25,00 cm
Minimum separation(s) -_______24.92 cm

Determination of Pr
_______________P K0 = 515507.2 kg______________ Separation between abutments is reduced by half
Calculation of PRx = 292500 kg in length less than:
______________d/h = 0.923077 Diagram G. caves___C.13 Max. dim. cabbage. 65.00 cm
(1/6)*heightcol._______________70,00 cm
______________£/-__0,48___________q-__________________0.17
______________ __Kx =_0.45_________ 60cm 60.00 cm
Calculation of P RY = 487500 kg Length(L)=__________________70,00 cm
d/h = 0.9 Number of stirrups 6
Diagram G. caves C.13
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 13 of 18

q= 0.17
Ky= 0.75
PR calculation
PR > Pu
Pu 185005.7 kg
Pe 283266.2 kg
The design is acceptable

SHEAR DESIGN
V= 13737.24kg
The column is in: Flexocompression
_______________p= 0.0070_
_______________p__________<_________0.15__________YEAH
_______________Pu 185005.7kg_____
FR(0.7fcAg+2000As)=______397926.40kg
Q, < FR(0.7fcAg + 2000As) YES

VCR - 7345.84 kg

V u - VCR = 6391.40 kg
s calculated = 44.79 cm
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 14 of 18

Review of resistance limit states.

Design results of footing Z-1 DAD0 D-1 AND CONTRABE CT-1

Z-1 Shoe AA Cut

Materials

Concrete, f'c : 250.00 [Kg/cm2] Steel, fy : 4200.00 [Kg/cm2]

Concrete type : Normal Epoxy coating : No
Concrete modulus of elasticity : 221360.00 [Kg/... Modulus of elasticity steel : 2100000.00 [Kg...
Unit weight : 2400.00 [Kg/m3]

Shoe assembly
Free coating : 5.00 [cm]
Maximum allowable ratio between Rho/Rho balancing : 0.75
Armed (xx) lower : #4 @20.00cm
Armed (xx) superior : #3 @20.00cm
Armed (zz) lower : #4 @20.00cm
Armed (zz) superior : #3 @20.00cm
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 15 of 18

• 6#4 (12")
c 2#3 ( 3 8 ")

• 8#5 (5 8") f'c = 250 kg/cm 2 (Class

f'c = 250 kg/cm 2 (Class
YO)
YO) TMA 19mm fy = 4,200
TMA 19mm fy = 4,200 kg/cm 2
kg/cm 2 E#3 @ 20cm
E#3 @ 15cm

CT-1 Counterlock
Given D-1

Assembling the die

Longitudinal : 8#5

Free coating : 2.50 [cm]

Provided area : 15.93 [cm2]
Cross : #3 @ 15.00cm

Soil - foundation interaction :

:
Allowable pressure 10 [Ton/m2]
Safety factor min. for sliding : 1.25
Safety factor min. to overturn : 1.25
ruling state
State qprom qmax
At max DEF - 1
Compressed area Flip F.S.
shoe [Ton/m2] [Ton/m2] [cm] [m2] (%) FSx FSz slip.
--------------------------------
21.9 0.694 6.08 78 3.00 2.73 9.91
DEF - 1 8.07

Flexion
Factor 0.90
• : 0.00200
Minimum amount :
Development length
Axis Pos. ld lhd Dist1 Dist2 [cm]
[cm] [cm] [cm]

zz Info. 41.10 15.24 -8.00 212.00

xx Info. 59.37 20.78 227.00 -8.00
zz His p. 30.48 15.24 -8.00 212.00
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 16 of 18

xx His p. 42.10 15.24 227.00 -8.00

Axis Asreq/Asprov Mu/(

Pos. State Mu • *Mn Asreq Asprov • *Mn)
shoe [Ton*m] [Ton*m] [cm2] [cm2]
zz His p. SISX3 - 1 -7.23 -14.00 9.16 18.00 0.509 0.517
1 1___
Info. SISX2 - 1 0.83 14.00 16.80 18.00 0.933 0.059
zz
•
•________
His p. SISZ3 - 1 -6.06 -18.38 8.29 26.00 0.319 0.329
xx
—______
Info. SISZ2 - 1 1.23 18.38 16.80 26.00 0.646 0.067
xx
•
•________
Cutting
Factor :
• 0.75
Plane shear area zz :
Plane shear area xx 0.59 [m2]
:
0.55 [m2]
Flat State Vu
shoe vc Vu/(
[Ton] [Ton] • *Vn)

xy SISX4 - 1 7.99 46.06 0.231 •________•

and Z SISZ4 - 1 9.42 49.79 0.252 •________•

Punching shear
Shear perimeter (bo 1) 1.25 [m]
Punching area 0.26 [m2]
Column State Vu vc
Vu/(
shoe [Ton] [Ton] 4*Vn)

column 1 SISX4 - 1 28.16 42.93 0.875 1______•

Design of
the Given
Armed:
Given Asreq
Asprov
[cm2]
[cm2] Asreq/Asprov
1 27.00 28.39 0.95

Biaxial bending: Mc/(

• *Mn)
Given State Muxx muzz d*Mnxx d*Mnzz
shoe [Ton*m] [Ton*m] [Ton*m] [Ton*m]
11
1 SISX4 - 1 0.00 1.19 0.00 26.85 0.04 ------ —

Axial:
Given State Pu • *Pn Pu/(
d *Pn)
shoe [Ton] [Ton]
 Structures Department
He performed: MRG
Project: ARCH CEILING Revised: VGL
Location: Date: 12/2018
Page 17 of 18
11
SISX4 - 1 -41.33 -357.21 0.12

Cutting:
Given 1:
S adopted : 0.00 [cm]
S calculated : 0.00 [cm]
Vu vc Vs
State Dir. • *Vn Vu/(
• *Vn)
[Ton] [Ton] [Ton] [Ton]
1 1
10.80 23.71 0.00 17.78 0.61 '1
SISX4 x
3.24 24.06 0.00 18.04 0.18 1—1 in
SISX4 z