RUBRIC FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE NATURAL SCIENCE PROJECT: ECOSYSTEMS OF ECUADOR
Subject: Natural Sciences
Evidence of evaluation: Presentation of a document that describes a topic of the subject's study plan
Evaluation Tool: Album Presentation
Requirements: Explain the research carried out to prepare the project and answer questions about it
Evaluation indicator
Evidence/Criterion
Organization and
presentation of the work:
Cover and region
Description of the Mangrove
ecosystem
Map
Mental Food web of the Mangrove
ecosystem
Punctuation and spelling in
writing
Exposure Verbal communication
(Discussion on the topic:
questions asked by the
teacher)
Know how Exploratory relationship
to live with the environment
together
OBSERVATIONS: TOTAL NOTE
Course: Tenth Parallel:
Delivery date: ___ December 2019
Performance standard
Excellent Points: 1.5 point
It presents an adequate cover and
the name of the region is correctly
identified.
The content is well organized using
titles and references to explain the
topic
The content is well organized using
titles and references to explain the
topic
There are no spelling mistakes and
it is written appropriately.
Performance standard
Excellent Points: 3.0 point
The student identified the most
important concepts of the work,
demonstrating excellent mastery
of the topic.
Performance standard
Excellent Points: 1.0 point
The student relates the topic to
places in the environment where
he lives.
WEIGHING
Performance standard
Acceptable Points: 0.75 point
It has an adequate cover but the
name of the region is not
correctly identified.
Uses titles to organize, but the
content is not well organized to
explain the topic
Uses titles to organize, but the
content is not well organized to
explain the topic
There are no spelling mistakes but
the writing of the arguments is
average
Performance standard
Acceptable Points: 2.0 point
The student identified the
concepts of the work,
demonstrating an average
mastery of the topic.
Performance standard
Acceptable Points:
Performance standard Score
Not acceptable Points: 0 point obtained
It does not have an adequate
cover and the name of the region
is not correctly identified.
The content is not well organized,
does not use titles and references
to explain the topic
The content is not well organized,
does not use titles and references
to explain the topic
There are spelling mistakes and
the texts of the arguments are not
adequately drafted.
Performance standard
Not acceptable Points: 0 point
The student did not identify the
most important concepts of the
work, demonstrating a vague
mastery of the topic.
Performance standard
Not acceptable Points: 0 point
The student does not relate the
topic with places in the
environment where he lives
 SIGNATURES OF RESPONSIBILITY
Director Area director teacher Representative Grade obtained

RUBRIC FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE NATURAL SCIENCE PROJECT: HISTORY OF CARBON
Subject: Natural Sciences Course: Ninth Parallel:
Evidence of evaluation: Presentation of a document that describes a topic of the subject's study plan
Evaluation Tool: Album Presentation Delivery date: ___ December 2019
Requirements: Explain the research carried out to prepare the project and answer questions about it

Evaluation indicator WEIGHING

Evidence/Criterion
Organization and
presentation of work
Contents: History, forms,
properties
Map
Mental Carbon cycle
Punctuation and spelling in
writing
Exposure Verbal communication
(Discussion on the topic:
questions asked by the
teacher)
Performance standard
Excellent Points: 1.5 point
It presents a well-crafted cover and
its album shows cleanliness,
organization and distribution.
The content is well organized using
titles and references to explain the
topic
Make an appropriate drawing
(color, lines) about the cycle
showing organized content using
titles and references to explain the
topic
There are no spelling mistakes and
it is written appropriately.
Performance standard
Excellent Points: 3.0 point
The student identified the most
important concepts of the work,
demonstrating excellent mastery
of the topic.
Performance standard
Acceptable Points: 0.75 point
It has a cover and its album shows
cleanliness
Uses titles to organize, but the
content is not well organized to
explain the topic
Make a drawing (color, lines)
about the cycle showing content
without using titles or references
to explain the topic
There are no spelling mistakes but
the writing of the arguments is
average
Performance standard
Acceptable Points: 2.0 point
The student identified the
concepts of the work,
demonstrating an average
mastery of the topic.
Performance standard Score
Not acceptable Points: 0 point obtained
It does not present a well-crafted
cover and its album does not
show cleanliness or organization.
The content is not well organized,
does not use titles and references
to explain the topic
It does not make an adequate
drawing (without color, without
lines) on the cycle without
showing organized content to
explain the topic
There are spelling mistakes and
the arguments are not properly
written.
Performance standard
Not acceptable Points: 0 point
The student did not identify the
most important concepts of the
work, demonstrating a vague
mastery of the topic.
 Performance standard Performance standard Performance standard
Excellent Points: 1.0 point Acceptable Points: Not acceptable Points: 0 point
Know how Exploratory relationship The student relates the topic to The student does not relate the
to live with the environment places, situations or experiences topic with places or
together in the environment. experiences in the environment
OBSERVATIONS: TOTAL NOTE

SIGNATURES OF RESPONSIBILITY
Director Area director teacher Representative Grade obtained

RUBRIC FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE NATURAL SCIENCE PROJECT: REPRESENTATION OF THE EARTH
Subject: Natural Sciences Course: Eighth Parallel:
Evidence of evaluation: Presentation of a constructed element that describes a topic of the subject's study plan
Evaluation tool: Presentation of a practical construction Delivery date: ___ December 2019
Requirements: Explain the research carried out to prepare the project and answer questions about it

Evaluation indicator WEIGHING

Evidence/Criterion
Organization and
Map presentation of work
Mental
Description of the layers
Description of continents and
oceans
Verbal communication
(Discussion on the topic)
Performance standard Performance standard Performance standard Score
Excellent Points: 1.0 point Acceptable Points: 0.50 point Not acceptable Points: 0 point obtained
It presents an earth-sphere with It presents an earth-sphere with It presents a poorly painted earth-
good color painting, sketches, colored painting, but it does not sphere, without adequate finishes.
oceans and appropriate finishes. have adequate finishes
The description of the layers is well Uses titles to describe layers, but The content is not well organized,
organized using titles and the content is not well organized does not use titles and references
references to explain the topic to explain the layers
The description is well organized Uses titles to describe, but the The content is not well organized,
using titles and references to content is not well organized does not use titles and references
explain the topic to explain
Performance standard Performance standard Performance standard
Excellent Points: 3.0 point Acceptable Points: 2.0 point Not acceptable Points: 0 point
The student identified the most The student identified the The student did not identify the
important concepts of the work, concepts of the work, most important concepts of the
demonstrating excellent mastery demonstrating an average work, demonstrating a vague
 Exposure
Verbal communication
(Questions asked by the
teacher)
Know to do Suggested requirements
for project development
OBSERVATIONS: TOTAL NOTE
of the topic.
The student can accurately
answer all questions related to
the topic
Performance standard
Excellent Points: 1.0 point
Met and exceeded the
expectations expected in the
development of the project
mastery of the topic. mastery of the topic.
The student can answer some The student cannot answer any
of the questions related to the of the questions related to the
topic topic
Performance standard Performance standard
Acceptable Points: 0.5 points Not acceptable Points: 0 point
Acceptably met expectations in Did not meet the requirements
the development of the project that were given in the
development of the project

SIGNATURES OF RESPONSIBILITY
Director Area director teacher Representative Grade obtained