Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Radio Link Budget Tools
Radio Link Budget Tools
Radio Link Budget Tools
Orange Labs
France Telecom group restricted
Synthesis 1/3
This presentation answers the following questions:
DL/UL, restructuring of the tool around two modes (Basic/Advanced) and new modeling
of shadowing and interferences.
throughput, by counting all losses and gains affecting signals between transmitters and
receivers.
For the basic mode, UL and DL link budgets are independently performed. The maintained
planned cell range corresponds to the cell range of the limiting link.
Based on different assumptions related to the structure of the network and to the
propagation model, the advanced mode calculates the interferences from other cells and
thus the throughput are provided for different distances to the serving cell.
The basic mode is suitable for setting design thresholds and planning cell range. Advanced
mode is better when inter-site distance is averagely known and for strategic comparison.
What are the inputs, outputs and main characteristics of the tools?
The main inputs are related to the system, the equipment and the environment
The main outputs are MAPL, UL/DL cell radius, Throughput versus distance and
models.
A new formula of shadowing margin taking into account the multi-cell server probability
calculated SINR in the cell and vice versa (Throughput => SINR).
Main limits of the models and hypothesis: the Link Budget tools are based on a simple
15 14
Throughput versus Distance
9 2 7 100
3 80
1
16 13 60
4
0
6 40
10 5 12
20
0
look-up tables 17
11
18
0,000 0,200 0,400
Distance (Km)
0,600
1. Before going through an investment committee in order to deploy a new radio access
network: this tool allows to estimate the coverage of a site and then helps operators to
calculate the minimum number of sites to cover a target surface with the user-provided
inputs and parameters and so make a rough coverage dimensioning.
2. Before designing the network with the ASSET: this tool calculates RSRP thresholds and
RSRQ thresholds (for a Downlink and an Uplink Target Throughput), to be used as an
input in the ASSET tool.
3. For a strategic comparison between some deployment scenarios, the tool can give an
idea about the maximum achieved quality of service (in terms of throughput) in different
position from a serving cell and for different parameters’ values.
2. RSCP/RSRP thresholds as input for the ASSET tool in order to create coverage maps:
■ To be used as an input for the ASSET cell planning tool
■ Coverage plots computation to ensure a targeted throughput in UL and DL
1. Restructuring of the link budget according to the operator needs: basic mode deals with the scenario
when the objectives are the maximum cell range and the RSRP/RSRQ design thresholds. Whereas,
advanced mode treats system performances of some network deployment scenarios when the inter-
sites distance is known.
2. Withdraw of the balanced and unbalanced modes.
3. For each link, the basic mode gives the planned cell range taking into account the limiting link.
4. Only UL was linear in the last version. In V3.6, the DL is also linear for the basic mode.
5. Modelling of the shadowing margin in multi-cellular environment for both UL and DL.
6. Modelling of DL interferences in basic and advanced mode; i.e. a closed formula of the interference
factor is developed and used.
7. For the advanced mode, both UL and DL are given whereas in V3.5, only DL existed.
8. In addition to RSRP threshold, RSRQ threshold is also given in V3.6 for the basic mode.
9. UL Fractional Power Control (FPC) feature is supported in V3.6 for the advanced mode.
10. New UL louk-up table (SNR vs Throughput) is provided allowing the use of high and different
throughput scenarios.
30
Cell Throughput versus Distance
UL Throughput Mbps
160
140
120
Cell Throughput versus Distance
DL Throughput Mbps
Throughput (Mbps)
25
Throughput (Mbps)
100
20 80
Throughput (Mbps)
120 120
Throughput (Mbps)
25 100 100
Throughput (Mbps)
80 80
20
60 60
15
DL Link curve
mapping
UL MHA
Gain
Shadowing
Feeder loss margin
eNB power
Target UL Target DL
SINR Fixed RoT margin SINR
Body loss
Target UL A
throughput
Input data
11
SINR calculation
SINR
Cell Throughput versus Distance
160
140
Results (Outputs)
120 DL Throughput Mbps
Throughput (Mbps)
100
80
60
Cell throughput
40
20
0
Versus
160
Cell Throughput versus RSRP
0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4
Distance (Km)
0,5
160
0,6 0,7
120
Throughput (Mbps)
100 100
80
60
40
80
60
40
- RSRP/ RSRQ
20 20
0 0
-120 -110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -19,5 -18,5 -17,5 -16,5 -15,5 -14,5 -13,5 -12,5
RSRP (dBm) RSRQ (dB)
It is suitable for this scenario, since it It can not be used unless you change many times
To dimension the
gives the coverage of the cell as the intersite distance until that the target throughput
number of sites
output. is achieved at cell edge.
To set design
suitable because the target throughput
thresholds Same arguments as above
is achieved at cell edge
(RSRP/RSRQ)
To study the It is better to use this mode because the
It is not suitable because the
performances of interference is better calculated at each point.
interference is taken as a fixed margin
the system when However because of the assumption related to the
and the tool gives only the minimum
inter-site distance network regularity, the interference at cell edge is
achieved throughput at cell edge
is known over-estimated.
Remarque
The coverage given by the basic mode is close to a shifted coverage on field when the RoT
(Rise over Thermal) is a fixed margin.
For a fixed and bounded RoT margin, the basic mode under-estimates the interference at cell
edge.
For the basic mode, the used RoT (Rise For the advanced mode, the interferences
over Thermal) is calculated at cell edge (hatched surface) is
−
over-estimated because:
Ω = − 10 Log 10 1 − f . ρ . S RX / N 0 - In the majority of points the signals coming
from the first and second interferers are higher
The interference factor is taken as the average than the signal of the serving cell (in reality this
over the cell. cannot be happen). 2
The operating frequency band R99, HSPA: 900, 1800, 2100 MHz
Frequency band
for system. LTE: 800, 1800 , 2600 MHz
System
The operating channel
Bandwidth For LTE: 5, 10, 15 & 20MHz.
bandwidth.
Environnent
Morphology The environment morphology. Dense Urban, Urban, Suburban & Rural
PathLoss = K 1 + K 2 × log 10 ( d )
K1 and K2 depend on propagation environment, antenna heights, and carrier
frequency.
Two Propagation Models are used depending on K1 and K2:
Okumura-Hata Model (for f>1,5GHz),
The log-distance models are very simple and does not really depend on any terrain
clutter.
0,95
15 14
C (r )
SINRHSDPA ( r ) = 9 2 7
P
α ( r ) × I Intra ( r ) + F ( r ) × NodeB + ThermalNoi se 3
Mi R1
1
PL 0( r ) 16 0 r
θ θ1
13
R r
4 6
1 10 5 12
SINR _ LTE (r ) =
F (r ) + N 0 × PL0 / PSubcarrier
DL 17 18
11
Throughput (Kbits/s)
-9 36
UE receiver -7 52 8000
-5 81
multiple antenna use -3 134 6000
-1 226
1 360 4000
3 548
5 805 2000
7 1132
9 1522 0
11 1986 0,000 0,500 1,000 1,500
13 2604
15 3674
Distance (Km)
17 5257 3
19 7183
21 9081
23 10656
25 11686
27 12291
29 12555
2
26 France Telecom group restricted RNM/REP/REM/ R.NASRI
Other parameters
Main limits of the models and hypothesis: Link Budget tools are based on a
simple approach: Values of gains, losses and margins are fixed
Simple approach
Gains (Antenna, MHA)
Simple formulae
Load (uniform distribution)
Inter-cell interference
SINR
Network design
Does not utilize database of realistic sites (but ASSET does)
UL analysis (UL DCH R99, HSUPA,UL LTE) reflects only coverage dimensioning
[7] Radio Link Budgets of Orange PEAK/REM/ F. M, Sept 2012 RAN Engineering
Labs
Orange Labs
France Telecom group restricted