Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cthe-The Effect of Varying Flow Rate
Cthe-The Effect of Varying Flow Rate
STUDENT NAME:
SHAUN PATRICK ALBAO
ELAINE CAJOLES
DEITHER EDLOY
DIVINA GRACIA MALPAS
JHILSEAN BRIX NIMROD OLMEDO
Experiment No. 1A
Title
THE EFFECT OF VARYING FLOW RATE USING A CONCENTRIC TUBE HEAT
EXCHANGER (TD360a)
Objective
To show how different cold flow rates affect the performance of the heat exchanger in both
parallel flow and counter flow connection (hot flow rate and heater temperature are fixed).
Introduction
CONCENTRIC TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER (TD360a)
This heat exchanger is a simple shell and tube heat exchanger. It has two tubes, one inside the
other. The outer tube is the shell. The inner tube carries the water from the hot circuit of the
Service Module, the other tube carries the water from the cold circuit. Heat transfers between the
two tubes. You may connect the water circuits to give contra-flow (counter-flow) or parallel flow
experiments.
This heat exchanger is in two equal parts with extra thermocouples at the mid-point. This helps
students understand more clearly how the temperature changes along the heat exchanger. [1]
A diagram in the middle of the heat exchanger bedplate shows students how to connect the heat
exchanger.
This section only gives the basic information needed to do the experiments. For full theory, refer
to the textbooks listed in Maintenance, Spare Parts md Customer Care on page 73 of the user
guide [1].
Flow Conversion
Document No:
Republic of the Philippines
EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Revision Date:
Tacloban City
College of Engineering Page No.
Chemical Engineering Department 4 of 20
CHE 411L – CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY II
The Service Module measures flow in liters per minute (L.min -1), but your calculations need flow
in cubic meters per second (m3.s-1)
Useful Equations
Heat Capacity (C)
This is a measure of the heat needed to increase the temperature of a given mass of material by 1
degree (Kelvin or Celsius). [3]
It is a product of the mass of a material (m) and its specific heat capacity (c).
Pressure and temperature affects specific heat capacity, so equation 5 assumes constant pressure
over a known range of temperature. It is the 'isobaric' (equal pressure) specific heat capacity.
You may use Figure 21 to find the specific heat capacity for your mean water temperature.
Alternatively, Equation 6 (based on data from tests) will give you an accurate answer (where
your temperature T is in Celsius):
From tests, the specific heat capacity of water at 15°C is 4185.5 J.kg-1.K-1
NOTE: You must use the mean (or average) temperature of your flow circuit in this equation.
Document No:
Republic of the Philippines
EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Revision Date:
Tacloban City
College of Engineering Page No.
Chemical Engineering Department 6 of 20
CHE 411L – CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY II
NOTE: You must use the average temperature of your flow circuit in this equation.
Document No:
Republic of the Philippines
EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Revision Date:
Tacloban City
College of Engineering Page No.
Chemical Engineering Department 7 of 20
CHE 411L – CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY II
In an ideal heat exchanger, that does not lose or absorb heat from its surroundings, the cool fluid
absorbs all the heat from the hot fluid. So, the heat transfer rate is:
But, as shown, because of the possible heat flow into or out of the system, the energy balance
coefficient can give answers of greater than 1 if the heat exchanger absorbs energy from its
surroundings. [1] So, it is only for guidance, because, in reality:
The mean temperature efficiency and heat transfer coefficient give more useful results for
comparison between heat exchangers.
The temperature efficiency of the hot circuit of the Heat Exchanger is the ratio of the temperature
change in the hot circuit, divided by the difference between the maximum and minimum
temperatures of the hot and cold circuits:
The temperature efficiency of the cold circuit of the Heat Exchanger is the ratio of the
temperature change in the cold circuit, divided by the difference between the maximum and
minimum temperatures of the hot and cold circuits:
he mean temperature efficiency of the two circuits is the average efficiency of them both:
NOTE: All optional heat exchangers have the same heat transfer area (A), to allow you to make
direct comparisons.
Methodology
Procedure 1-Parallel Flow
1. Connect and set up your heat exchanger as shown in To Fit a Heat Exchanger on Page 27 of
the user guide. Connect for parallel flow and a heater tank temperature of 60°C.
2. Create a blank results table, similar to Table 3. If you have VDAS, in the top left of the
layout, select the correct heat exchanger. The software will create a table for you
automatically when you start taking readings.
3. Use an accurate thermometer to check the local ambient air temperature for reference.
4. For the first test, use the hand operated flow control valves to set the hot and cold flow rates
as shown for Test 1 in Table 3. Allow at least five minutes for the heat exchanger
temperatures to stabilize.
NOTE: Your cold-water supply will probably change slightly as you do the experiment so you
may need to adjust the flow control valves slightly to keep the flow rote constant.
5. Record the hot and cold circuit temperatures.
6. Repeat the procedure for flow rates as shown in the table for tests 2, 3 and 4.
Results Analysis
Use the input and output temperatures (T H1,TH2. TC1, and TC2) to create simple temperature charts
for each flow, similar to Figure 30. Note that the results for parallel flow and counter flow will be
different.
Document No:
Republic of the Philippines
EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Revision Date:
Tacloban City
College of Engineering Page No.
Chemical Engineering Department 11 of 20
CHE 411L – CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY II
As shown in the two figures below, the mean temperature efficiency is higher at lower flow rates
because the cold fluid is in the heat exchanger for longer, and has more time to absorb heat.
1.00 25.0
Mean Temperature
0.80 20.0
Efficiency
0.60 15.0
0.40 10.0
0.20 5.0
0.00 0.0
0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Cold Flow Rate (L.min-1)
1.00 25.0
Mean Temperature
0.80 20.0
Efficiency
0.60 15.0
0.40 10.0
0.20 5.0
0.00 0.0
0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Cold Flow Rate (L.min-1)
Flow rate affects heat transfer coefficient but flow direction does not, as shown in the table
below. This because the heat transfer coefficient partly depends on material properties (which
remain the same) and the thermal boundary layer, which changes with fluid velocity (flow rate).
These results below show no noticeable difference between parallel and counter flow as the
mean temperature of hot and cold is similar in both cases. The benefit of counter flow over
parallel flow is that counter flow allows the hot out (T H2) to be lower than the cold in (T C1). In
parallel flow, hot out is always higher than cold out. So, the mean temperature efficiency for
parallel flow is effectively limited to 50% (excluding external heat transfer), but theoretically it
can exceed 100% for the counter flow. In this concentric tube exchanger, there is not sufficient
heat transfer to see this happen.
Parallel Flow
60
50
Temperature
40
30
20
10
0
P1 P3 P2
Position
Hot Cold
Document No:
Republic of the Philippines
EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Revision Date:
Tacloban City
College of Engineering Page No.
Chemical Engineering Department 14 of 20
CHE 411L – CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY II
60
50
Temperature
40
30
20
10
0
P1 P3 P2
Position
Hot Cold
60
50
Temperature
40
30
20
10
0
P1 P3 P2
Position
Hot Cold
Document No:
Republic of the Philippines
EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Revision Date:
Tacloban City
College of Engineering Page No.
Chemical Engineering Department 15 of 20
CHE 411L – CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY II
60
50
Temperature
40
30
20
10
0
P1 P3 P2
Position
Hot Cold
Counter Flow
60
50
Temperature
40
30
20
10
0
P1 P3 P2
Position
Hot Cold
Document No:
Republic of the Philippines
EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Revision Date:
Tacloban City
College of Engineering Page No.
Chemical Engineering Department 16 of 20
CHE 411L – CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY II
60
50
Temperature
40
30
20
10
0
P1 P3 P2
Position
Hot Cold
60
50
Temperature
40
30
20
10
0
P1 P3 P2
Position
Hot Cold
Document No:
Republic of the Philippines
EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Revision Date:
Tacloban City
College of Engineering Page No.
Chemical Engineering Department 17 of 20
CHE 411L – CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY II
40
30
20
10
0
P1 P3 P2
Position
Hot Cold
With respect to other heat exchangers used which were discussed in separate documents, results
for shell and tube are very similar to concentric tube. This is as expected as they are similar. The
benefit of the shell and tube is its compactness for the same heat exchange area. The plate heat
exchanger is comparably less effective than tubular types. But it is more. compact and rugged
than the other designs.
Conclusion
The flow rate (of the cold fluid) affects heat transfer coefficient (which measures the
performance of the heat exchanger) but flow direction (which can be parallel flow or counter
flow) does not. This because the heat transfer coefficient partly depends on material properties
(which remain the same) and the thermal boundary layer, which changes with fluid velocity
(flow rate).
References
References
[1] TecQuipment Ltd, "TD360 Bench-Top Heat Exchangers User Guide," TecQuipment,
Nottingham.
[2] C. J. Geankoplis, D. H. Lepek and A. Hersel, Principles of Transport Processes and
Seperation Processes, 5th ed., New York City: Pearson, 2018.
[3] W. L. McCabe, J. C. Smith and P. Harriot, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, 5th
ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993.
Document No:
Republic of the Philippines
EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Revision Date:
Tacloban City
College of Engineering Page No.
Chemical Engineering Department 18 of 20
CHE 411L – CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY II
Experiment No. 1
Document No:
Republic of the Philippines
EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Revision Date:
Tacloban City
College of Engineering Page No.
Chemical Engineering Department 19 of 20
CHE 411L – CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY II
APPENDIX
DATA SHEET
Power Absorbed
Energy Balance
Power Emitted
Temperature 1
Temperature 2
Temperature 3
Temperature 4
Temperature 1
Temperature 2
Temperature 3
Temperature 4
Specific Heat
Specific Heat
Capacity Cold
Capacity Hot
Coefficient
Density Cold
Density Hot
Δ TCold
Δ THot
Time
Flow
Flow
(s) (°C) (°C) (°C) (°C) (J.kg-1.K-1) (J.kg-1.K-1) (kg.m-3) (kg.m-3) (W) (W) (°C) (°C) (°C) (°C) (L.min-1) (°C) (°C) (°C) (°C) (L.min-1)
Parallel
0 2.0 14.8 61.0 38.2 4184.56 4178.10 982.67 992.89 412.57 409.31 0.99 29.0 43.8 38.2 37.1 0.40 61.5 59.5 61.0 40.7 3.01
43.9 2.4 13.5 61.3 36.8 4184.70 4178.00 982.52 993.40 501.61 560.31 1.12 28.8 42.3 36.8 36.8 0.60 62.0 59.6 61.3 40.8 3.05
107.6 2.7 11.2 61.0 35.5 4184.56 4177.94 982.67 993.86 562.53 620.07 1.10 28.7 39.9 35.5 37.3 0.80 61.9 59.2 61.0 41.0 3.04
158.7 3.0 10.0 60.8 34.6 4184.47 4177.93 982.78 994.17 620.97 699.18 1.13 28.7 38.7 34.6 37.2 1.01 61.8 58.8 60.8 41.1 3.02
Counter flow
0 2.0 14.2 61.0 37.6 4184.56 4178.05 982.67 993.11 412.57 392.80 0.95 28.9 43.1 37.6 36.5 0.40 61.2 59.2 61.0 41.3 3.01
28 2.3 13.0 61.1 36.4 4184.60 4177.97 982.62 993.54 477.59 539.63 1.13 28.9 41.9 36.4 36.6 0.60 61.5 59.2 61.1 41.4 3.03
61.2 2.7 11.1 61.0 35.2 4184.56 4177.93 982.67 993.96 556.98 614.60 1.10 28.8 39.9 35.2 36.7 0.80 61.6 58.9 61.0 41.4 3.01
80.3 3.0 10.2 60.9 34.5 4184.51 4177.93 982.73 994.20 623.00 713.19 1.14 28.8 39.0 34.5 36.8 1.01 61.7 58.7 60.9 41.4 3.03
Document No:
Republic of the Philippines
EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Revision Date:
Tacloban City
College of Engineering Page No.
Chemical Engineering Department 20 of 20
CHE 411L – CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY II
ANSWER SHEET
Heat Exchanger: Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger (TD360a)
Connection: Parallel flow
Ambient Temperature: 30.5 °C
Heater Tank Temperature: 60 °C
Average TH*
Average TC*
Cold Flow
Hot Flow
(L/min)
(L/min)
LMTD
Test
TH1 TH2 ΔTH TH3* TC1 TC2 ΔTC TC3* ηH ηC ρH ρC cpH cpC Q̇ e Q̇ a CEB η ̅ U
1 3.01 0.40 61.5 59.5 2 61 61 29 43.8 14.8 38.2 38.2 6.15 45.5 982.7 992.9 4184.6 4178.1 413 409 0.99 25.8 23.1 893
2 3.05 0.60 62 59.6 2.4 61.3 61.3 28.8 42.3 13.5 36.8 36.8 7.23 40.7 982.5 993.4 4184.7 4178.0 502 560 1.12 23.9 24.4 1028
3 3.04 0.80 61.9 59.2 2.7 61 61 28.7 39.9 11.2 35.5 35.5 8.13 33.7 982.7 993.9 4184.6 4177.9 563 620 1.10 20.9 25.6 1098
4 3.02 1.01 61.8 58.8 3 60.8 60.8 28.7 38.7 10 34.6 34.6 9.06 30.2 982.8 994.2 4184.5 4177.9 621 699 1.13 19.6 26.1 1191
Average TC*
Cold Flow
Hot Flow
(L/min)
(L/min)
LMTD
Test
TH1 TH2 ΔTH TH3* TC1 TC2 ΔTC TC3* ηH ηC ρH ρC cpH cpC Q̇ e Q̇ a CEB η ̅ U
1 3.01 0.40 61.2 59.2 2 61 61 28.9 43.1 14.2 37.6 37.6 6.19 44.0 983 993 4184.6 4178.1 412.6 392.8 0.95 25.1 23.7 871
2 2.98 0.60 61.5 59.2 2.3 61.1 61.1 28.9 41.9 13 36.4 36.4 7.06 39.9 983 994 4184.6 4178.0 477.6 539.6 1.13 23.5 24.6 972
3 3.02 0.81 61.6 58.9 2.7 61 61 28.8 39.9 11.1 35.2 35.2 8.23 33.8 983 994 4184.6 4177.9 557.0 614.6 1.10 21.0 25.7 1085
4 3.00 1.02 61.7 58.7 3 60.9 60.9 28.8 39 10.2 34.5 34.5 9.12 31.0 983 994 4184.5 4177.9 623.0 713.2 1.14 20.1 26.1 1192