Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Action-Oriented Approach: Basic Principles of Teaching
Action-Oriented Approach: Basic Principles of Teaching
It is along these lines that the Common Framework of Reference for Languages moves, since
one of its fundamental methodological principles is the one described below and designed in the
subsequent scheme.
"The procedures used in language learning, teaching and research are those
considered most effective in achieving the agreed objectives , based on the needs of
the students as individuals in their social context, and using the strategies as a line of
action to maximize effectiveness by helping to put all skills into operation. But
effectiveness depends on the motivation and particular characteristics of the students,
as well as the nature of the resources, both human and material, that may come into
play."
METHODOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE
OF THE COMMON FRAMEWORK OF REFERENCE
ACCURACY OF
OBJECTIVES
(Continuously,
graduated
Desefnogcrrmiallad
auycaocdnlaatirna
u)a,
PERCEPTION OF
THE
The approach it adopts, in a general sense, focuses on action , since it considers users and
students who learn a language mainly as social agents , that is, as members of a society that has
tasks; but it speaks of "tasks" to the extent that the actions are carried out by one or more
individuals strategically using their specific competencies to achieve a specific result.
Users and
Focused students as
on action social
agents
Members of
a
society,
that
develop
a series
competitions
We are talking, therefore, about an action-oriented competency approach that must take
into account the entire series of specific capabilities that an individual applies as a social agent.
Consequently, any form of language use and learning could be schematized as follows:
APPROACH BY COMPETENCES
ACTION ORIENTED
"The use of language - which includes learning - includes the actions carried out by
people who, as individuals and as social agents , develop a series of skills , both general and
communicative , in particular. People use their skills in order to carry out language activities
that involve processes to produce and receive texts related to topics in specific areas , putting
into play the strategies that seem most appropriate to carry out the tasks they have to
Furthermore, the Common Framework of Reference for Languages makes it clear how each
of the fundamental concepts of its approach should be interpreted:
- Competencies are the sum of knowledge, skills and individual characteristics that allow a
person to perform actions.
- General competencies are those that are not directly related to the language, but which
can be used for actions of all kinds, including linguistic activities.
- Communicative skills are those that enable a person to act specifically using linguistic
means.
- The text is any sequence of discourse (spoken or written) related to a specific area and
that during the performance of a task constitutes the axis of a language activity, either as
support or as a goal, or as a product or as a process.
- The scope refers to the broad sectors of social life in which social agents act: the
educational, professional, public and personal spheres.
- A strategy is any organized, intentional and regulated line of action, chosen by any
individual to carry out a task that he proposes to himself or that he has to face.
Starting, then, from this action-oriented methodological approach, let's see what are the
basic principles that are proposed as a guide for effective teaching practice.
Teaching can facilitate attention to the formal in several ways, outlined in the following
table (Ellis, 2005) :
Option Description
b) Enhanced input .
The forms under study are highlighted (in italics, for
example) in order to promote their perception.
But second language acquisition also requires learners to pay attention to meaning. By
"attention to meaning" we mean pragmatic meaning (that is, the highly contextualized meanings that
emerge in acts of communication that require us to know how to organize a message, when to use it,
and how to express it).
In conclusion, it is not about multiplying and chaining tasks, but about including the student in
the learning process because what is clear is that "the language student has to acquire both forms
and meanings." (MCR, p. 113 - 5.2.1.4).
In that case, is explicit knowledge of any value in and of itself? Of course. It has been shown
that explicit knowledge is used both in message formulation processes and in supervision, and that
many learners have the ability to access their explicit memory to achieve these purposes, especially
if the rules are automated to a certain extent. .
Work on form must not be relegated to the margins, but rather the student must be led through an authentic
progression of learning sequences, so that they perceive the construction of their competencies.
Language learning is a slow and laborious process. Children acquiring their L1 take between
two and five years to reach full grammatical competence, and during that time they are exposed to
massive amounts of input . The same can be stated with respect to the acquisition of an L2. If
learners are not exposed to the target language they will not be able to acquire it. In general, the
greater the exposure to the language, the faster and more complete the learning will be.
Furthermore, the input must be made "understandable" either through its modification or
through contextual supports. And how can teachers ensure that their students have access to varied
input ?
a) Maximizing the use of the L2 within the classroom. Ideally, this means that the L2 should
become the means and the object of teaching.
b) Creating opportunities for students to receive input outside of the classroom. This can be
accomplished with great ease by providing extensive reading programs based on carefully
selected graded readings appropriate to the student's level.
c) Ideally, where additional resources are available, schools should establish self-contained
learning centers that students can use outside of school hours.
The student must be provided, from the initial level, with written and auditory texts and
documents that reflect the reality of the target language and culture.
The student must be provided, from the initial level, with written and auditory texts and documents that reflect the
reality of the target language and culture.
Language acquisition does not depend entirely on comprehensible input , but the learner's
output also plays a very important role. The contributions that can come from the output are the
following:
a) It forces syntactic processing, that is, it forces students to pay attention to grammar.
b) It allows students to test hypotheses about the grammar of the target language through
the feedback they get when they make mistakes.
c) Contributes to automating existing knowledge.
d) Provides opportunities for students to develop discourse skills.
e) It is important to help students develop a "personal voice" and guide the conversation
toward topics on which they want to contribute opinions.
The production process requires that the student mobilize all the communicative and
linguistic means at his disposal so that in a given situation he can express the need to ask for or give
It is essential that the student, even with the limited linguistic means available to him in
his learning stage, has the possibility on multiple occasions to go as far as possible to express what
he wants to say or write, that is, to put into I use the linguistic and communicative means that allow
you to go to the end of your desire for communication.
As he mobilizes his energies in this sense, the student will gain confidence in him, use the
most complex means and will be able to qualify what he says according to the situations in which he
finds himself.
A competency-oriented, action-oriented approach means promoting student autonomy, thereby helping to become aware of
the learning processes with a clear structure that collects and plans the components of the language.
Interaction is a way not only to automate existing linguistic resources, but also to create
new resources. Interaction promotes acquisition when a communication obstacle arises and learners
participate in the negotiation of meanings.
There are four essential requirements (Johnson, 1993) for classroom acquisition to be
fruitful:
a) Create contexts of language use where students have reasons to pay attention to the
language.
b) Provide opportunities for learners to use language to express their own personal
meanings.
c) Help students participate in language-related activities that are beyond their current
level of proficiency.
All of this can be most adequately provided by "tasks" in which the key to ensuring an
acquisition-rich interaction is allowing students to control the topic of the discourse. Obviously, this
is not something that is easily achieved, as teachers must ensure that classroom discourse is orderly.
One solution is to incorporate work in small groups. As we have already said, when students interact
with each other, it is very likely that a discourse rich in acquisition will emerge. However, there are
a number of risks in group work that can produce an undesirable effect (for example, excessive use
of the L1 in monolingual groups).
BENEFIT COMMENT
1. Increase in the
amount of oral In teacher-centered classrooms, the teacher typically speaks 80% of the
production of the time; In group work, more students talk for longer.
learner.
10. Increased Learning is encouraged because students are willing to take risks and can
learning. support the efforts of others.
For group work to be effective, a series of factors must be taken into account that
allow it to be carried out successfully. The student must be convinced that the task is relevant and
not just an opportunity to have fun. Each of them has to be responsible for their own personal
contribution to complete the activity of the group as a whole. It is advisable that the groups be of
four people who in turn can be divided into pairs. Everyone has to share resources, talk face to face.
It is essential to achieve group cohesion and not continually change them in order to develop positive
autonomy. The group must know that it will be evaluated as such by the entire class.
The teacher's role is essential in this process: he must observe and supervise the students'
work, intervene when a group is in difficulty and not allow a group to become discouraged or “drop
out” of the collective project.
Teachers can pay attention to the diversity in their students' aptitude by adopting a flexible
teaching approach that involves varied learning activities. In fact, studies on good language learners
suggest that successfully learning a language requires a flexible approach. Therefore, one way to
help students learn is to make a wide range of learning strategies available to them.
Regarding motivation, Dörnyei (2001) makes the obvious statement that "the best
motivational intervention is simply to increase the quality of our teaching" (p. 26). But he highlights,
in particular, the need for "clear teaching" and this includes some obvious prescriptions such as
"explain simply" and "teach at a pace that is neither too fast nor too slow." Teachers must also
accept that their responsibility is to ensure that their students are and remain motivated, and not to
lament the fact that they lack motivation. It may not be easy for teachers to influence students'
extrinsic motivation, but there is a lot you can do to increase their intrinsic motivation. To do this,
the formula is simple: it has to help you become aware of the learning processes with a clear
structure that collects and plans the components of the language.
In short, offering authentic learning strategies means providing work habits, clear reference
points so that the student knows where they are at all times.
Offering authentic learning strategies means providing work habits, clear reference points so that the student
knows where they are at all times.
But you can also design activities that carry strategies implicitly. For example, in a
written expression exercise - like the one we present below, also extracted from the ECO B1
Spanish manual (Romero and González, 2005) - the student can be asked to carry out some
preliminary steps: observe a model of written expression, classify discourse connectors,
generate ideas through an authentic document, plan, write in an order (using the discourse
connectors studied), etc.
Before writing a text (a personal letter, a cover letter, a report, etc.), it is essential
that the student observe a model and review the characteristics that make it different from
the others. Next, you will write a script or a thematic index and finally you will write the first
version taking into account the following aspects: that all the points of the script are well
related so that the presentation of the ideas is clear and orderly, write one idea per paragraph
and attend to formal issues (use of punctuation marks). It could be interesting for the student
to read the work to one of his classmates to verify that what he is trying to explain is
understandable to everyone.
The last phase will consist of carrying out a second draft, rearranging the content
according to the suggestions received and that are considered useful, improving the style
(ensuring
END OF QUIZ
living with other Spanish students or with a and life in your country.
7. Development of sociolinguistic
and cultural competencies.
of the society or societies in which the language is spoken. And it is important enough to
warrant explicit teaching since, at the same time,
BIBLIOGRAPHY
• Council of Europe (2002). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages:
Learning, Teaching, Assessment . Madrid. Anaya / Cervantes Institute / Ministry of
Education, Culture and Sports.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2001): Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
• Ellis, R. (2005): Second language acquisition in a teaching context. Analysis of existing
research . Wellington, Technical Department of the New Zealand Ministry of Education.
• Jacobs, G. (1998): "Cooperative learning or just grouping students: The difference makes a
difference", in W. Renandya and G. Jacobs (eds.), Learners and language learning (pp.
145-171). Singapore: SEAMEO.
• Johnson, D., Johnson R. and Holubec, E. (1993): Circles of Learning (4th ed.). Edina, MN:
Interaction Book Company.
• Romero Dueñas, C. and González Hermoso, A. (2005). ECHO B1. Modular Spanish Foreign
Language Course . Madrid. Edelsa.
• Skehan, P. (1998): A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.