Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report N°01 Practical Pharmacology
Report N°01 Practical Pharmacology
UNIVERSITY OF
PRACTICE OF
PHARMACOLOGY
VI Cycle of Studies Academic Semester 2020-II
teacher
Cluster
03
NORTH SUBSIDIARY
Chiclayo – Peru
2020
INDEX
Content
binding
Volume of
distribution (Vd)
Metabolism
Elimination half-lif
(t'ó)
Renal clearance
(0)
Dermal
IV. EXPERIMENTS
ASK:
In which of the administration routes will we have a better result with respect to
intensity?
HYPOTHESIS:
MATERIALS:
Piazepam
■ Software: Virtual Pharmacology Lab Software.
■ Methodology: Simulation using software –
vide
PROCEDURE:
5
5. Rectal. - through a cannula
RESULTS:
1. Oral 2.
Subcutaneous
3. Intramuscular. 4. Intraperitoneal.
5. Rectal.
6
Dose (ml) Lateritial Period (minutes) Intensity
Oral O.O5 10 2
S.C. 0.052 4 3
I.M. 0.048 2 3
IP 0.054 1 4
GO 0.058 15 1
Experiment oN°1: Action of the routes of administration on the effects of drugs, data collection matrix
Mouse N Weig Dose Via Effect intensity Observations
Latency Period (minutes)
ht(g)
mg my Basal Change
1 25 0.05
pra 10 0 ++
Started with sedation, and his respiratory rate
y decreased.
He became excited , and his respiratory rate
2 26 0.052 HE 4 0 +++
remained increased.
He was sedated, and his respiratory rate
3 24 0.048 I.M. 2 0 +++
decreased.
I present transient excitement, and then deep
4 27 0.054 IP 1 0 ++++
hypnosis.
5 29 0.058 GO 15 0 + No other effects occurred.
Effect intensity: No effect- 0. Sedenle= +. Hypnotic: ++ Deep Hypnosis: +++ Lists Respiratory: ++++.
DISCUSSION :
7
The effects usually begin to be noticed after the 1st dose, being muscle relaxation
and anticonvulsants. In an intramuscular dose the time for it to take effect is 2 – 5
minutes. The metabolism of diazepam is mainly hepatic and its half-life is 30 – 60
hours.
A drug was dosed to a group of 5 mice. The drug selected on this occasion was
Diazepam in a solution of 10 mg in 2 ml. Through this experiment, we sought to
affirm the effectiveness of changing the basal state to the intensification of the
side effects of the previously mentioned drug. For this reason, a dosage was
applied to each of the mice according to their weight, particularly the route of
administration.
In the attached table, the pathway of each of these and confirmation of the
intensity of the effect is clearly seen.
• In mouse number 1, the oral route was chosen. This pathway is recognized as
the most frequent in humans, especially in children. Unfortunately, the
effects of the drug were of a low intermediate level in the intensity of the
effects.
• In mouse #2 , the injectable was applied subcutaneously under the skin of
the back. The results in intensity were greater compared to the oral route.
Concluding that it is an intermediate way to visualize the effects of the drug.
• In mouse number 3, the intramuscular route was used in the quadriceps
muscle. The selection of the anatomical area is due to the fact that it must
be a richly irrigated muscle, such as the gluteus in men. The intensity of the
effects is similar to the subcutaneous route on this occasion.
• In mouse #4 , dosing was intraperitoneal. It should be noted that this route is
very similar to the intravenous route in humans. The only difference is
second. If a categorization was made of which had the greatest magnitude
in results, it would be stated that this one. It has an intensity of 4 compared
to the rest.
• In mouse #5, an irregular route was used through a cannula. This route is in
the rectal area, which is characterized by being infrequent due to the
epithelium of the mucosa and irrigation. It had the least effect on what
would become the intensity of the drug's effects.
8
Experiment No. 2: Action of the vehicle, on the effect of medications
PROCEDURE:
Based on the class videos, in this practice 3 mice will be used (white, head, back)
and calculations will be made to present the respective results in the proposed
tables and complete it with the doses of the administered substances, to finally
make a discussion about the effect of the vehicles on the observed drug.
A second mouse (Head / 30 g) was injected with the same drug, at the
2nd MOUSE HEAD:
same dose and by the same route, but replacing the distilled water with the
vehicle gelatin in sol at 15%.
9
A third mouse (Lomo / 33 g) was administered the same drug, by the
3rd LOMO MOUSE:
same route and at the same dose, but this time using a 1% adrenaline solution as
a vehicle.
Answer:
It corresponds to 0.0594 ml
of Strychnine.
EXPERIMENT Nº 2: Action of the vehicle, on the effect of medications, data collection matrix
Mouse Drugs and dosage mg ml Effect intensity Observation
Latency period
(sec.)
White Strychnine 0.063 0.363 +++
15 It began with an
increase in
Distilled water 0.3 0.3
respiratory rate,
followed of
convulsions (+++)
and tetany.
Head +++ Start showing
Strychnine 0.054 0.354 360 increase in
1
0
Jelly 0.3 0.3 respiratory rate,
hyperreflexia
and
Loin +++ seizures (++).
Beginning
Strychnine 0.0594 0.3594 180 presenting an
0.3 0.3 increase in
Adrenalin respiratory rate,
followed by
hyperreflexia,
convulsions (+++)
and tetany.
Effect intensity: No effect = 0. Hyperreflexia = +. Seizures = ++. Seizures = +++. Respiratory paralysis = ++++.
Latency Period
STEP 4: Discussion
1
1
Strychnine
Time and Gelatin: Gelatin
Plasma is a colloid
and its characteristic
concentration is to absorb40
Case 1: propranolol ormg/kg
otherwise
- POfix
strychnine
(min) colloid(ng/ml)
micelles to its micelles, and also causes a decrease in the
-
permeability
0 of the blood
0 capillaries through which the substances are absorbed.
The 30
reaction is evident Adult
63.819in 360 seconds, which is greater than in the 2 mice.
60 60.458
90 40.145
120and Adrenaline: Adrenaline
Strychnine 30.522 is a vasoconstrictor that will cause a reduction in blood
flow 180 in the capillaries.
22.354 Therefore, when administering the drug with adrenaline, it
will 240
decrease blood flow causing a decrease in the distribution capacity of the
18.344
drug, 360 delaying its effect.
13.055
420 11.052
480 9.358
It is because of this that the latency period is moderately slow. In the case of
distilled water, the latency period and the intensity of the response are considered
as a standard to compare these magnitudes with the results of the other mice. The
other vehicles in which strychnine is administered (gelatin and adrenaline) do slow
its absorption rate, which is evidenced by the prolongation of the latency period
and a less intense effect.
MATERIAL
PROCEDURE
Below, 8 cases are presented, the results of which are found in the experiment
results table.
Line graphs with X/Y axis should be constructed for all cases, delimiting the
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic clinical parameters.
Case 1 - An adult individual was administered orally propranolol at a dose of 40 mg/kg.
1
2
Latency period: 15 min approx.
Tmax: 30 min
Cmax: 63,819 mg/ml
t1/2: 120 min
Duration of effect: 360 – 15 = 345 min
MCE (Minimum Effective Concentration) 13.055
MEC (maximum effective concentration): 30.522
ABC: It is not possible to
Therapeutic window: calculate
Does not have
CMT (minimum toxic concentration): -
Plasma concentration
Case 2: Propranolol 40 mg/kg - V0 - Adult
Time (min) (ng/ml)
0 0 elderly
30 112.744
60 97.054
90 66.282
120 58.074
180 46.804
240 41.426
360 34.119
420 31.077
480 28.312
1020 12.249
1080 11.16
1
3
Latency period: 600 min
Tmax: 30 min
Cmax: 103,431 mg/ml
t1/2: 120 min
Duration of effect: -
MCE (Minimum Effective Concentration) 11.375
MEC (maximum effective concentration): 66.282
ABC: It is not possible to
Therapeutic window: calculate
Does not have
CMT (minimum toxic concentration): -
plasma concentration
Time (min) (ng/ml) Case 3: Propranolol 40 mg/kg - PO
0 0 -
30 103.431 Adult
60 73.487
90 66.282
120 37.1
180 27.171
240 22.298
360 15.868
420 13.434
480 11.375
540 9.632 700
600 8.156
Latency period: 10 min approx.
Tmax: 30 min
Cmax: 112,744 mg/ml
t1/2: 120 min
Duration of effect: 1020 – 10 = 1010 min
MCE (Minimum Effective Concentration) 12.249
MEC (maximum effective concentration): 97.054
ABC: It is not possible to
Therapeutic window: calculate
Does not have
CMT (minimum toxic concentration): -
1
4
Propranolol was administered orally to an adult individual with a diagnosis of
Case 4 -
liver cirrhosis at a dose of 40 mg/kg.
plasma concentration
Time (min) (ng/ml) Case: propranolol 40 Mg/kg - PO - Adult
0 0
30 211.171
60 150.036
90 75.745
120 55.474
180 45.524
240 38.307
480 23.224
540 19.665
840 8.562
900 7.25
Latency period: 60 min
Tmax: 30 min
Cmax: 211,171 mg/ml
t1/2: 120 min
Duration of effect: -
MCE (Minimum Effective Concentration) 11.375
MEC (maximum effective concentration): 66.282
ABC: It is not possible to
Therapeutic window: calculate
Does not have
CMT (minimum toxic concentration): -
1
5
Propranolol was administered orally to an individual with a diagnosis of liver
Case 5 -
cirrhosis at a dose of 120 mg/kg.
1
6
Ampicillin was administered orally to an adult, considering a gastric pH of 2, at
Case 6:
a dose of 500 mg/kg.
0 0
60 6257.648
120 3458.025
180 1906.291
240 1050.97
300 579.506
360 319.619
480 97.37
600 29.8
Latency period:
Tmax: 60 min
Cmax: 6257.648 mg/ml.
t1/2: 3128.824
Duration of effect
MCE (Minimum Effective Concentration) -
MEC (maximum effective concentration): 6257.648 mg/ml
ABC: It is not possible to
Therapeutic window: calculate
Does not have
CMT (minimum toxic concentration): -
1
7
It was administered to an adult individual orally, considering a gastric pH of
Case 7:
3.5. Ampicillin at a dose of 500 mg/ml.
120 1508.474
180 831.57
240 458.459
300 252.794
360 139.426
480 42.475
Plasma concentration
600 12.999
Latency period:
Tmax: 60 min
Cmax: 729.737mg/ml.
t1/2: 1364.8685
Duration of effect:
MCE (Minimum Effective Concentration) -
MEC (maximum effective concentration): 6257.648 mg/ml
ABC: It is not possible to
Therapeutic window: calculate
Does not have
CMT (minimum toxic concentration): -
1
8
Ampicillin was administered orally to a patient with renal failure in a dose of
Case 8:
500 mg/ml.
0 0
60 8724.918
120 7902.845
180 7145.824
240 6461.478
300 5842.816
360 5283.518
480 4320.732
600 3533.736
Latency period:
Tmax: 60 min
Cmax: 8724.918 mg/ml.
t1/2: 362.459
Duration of effect:
MCE (Minimum Effective Concentration) -
MEC (maximum effective concentration): 8724.918 mg/ml
ABC: It is not possible to
Therapeutic window: calculate
Does not have
CMT (minimum toxic concentration): -
DISCUSSION EXPERIMENT 3:
Propranolol is a medication that is mostly ingested orally and is characterized by
having a high affinity for binding plasma proteins. It has a half-life between 3-
5hrs, and the determined time to reach its maximum effect is 1h to 1h30min. It is
characterized by: reducing heart rate, increasing renin activity in plasma and
inhibiting lipolysis.
In the data analysis, there are limitations in being able to find some
pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC, therapeutic window) since the software was
not available or the effects were not mentioned in some cases.
1
9
higher doses.
In case 2 : the administration of the drug was to an older adult, where the Cmax. is
higher than that of case 1, it means that the drug entered the circulation in
higher concentrations. This particularity could be explained by the fact that first-
pass metabolism and the enzymes involved in it are reduced in older adults.
In case 3 : the drug Propranolol was administered orally at a dose of 40 mg/ml to an
adult with a diagnosis of renal failure. As a consequence, an increase in the
effect of the drug can be seen, due to an alteration in renal failure.
In case 4 and 5 : the drug Propranolol was administered to an adult with a diagnosis of
liver cirrhosis. Here it can also be seen that the Cmax is high, due to an
alteration of the CYP340 system, a product of liver failure, therefore, the
duration of the effect is also longer if we compare it with case 1 (base case).
Ampicillin has an oral absorption of 35 to 50% reduced by consumption with
food. It is stable in the presence of gastric acid with good absorption in the
gastrointestinal tract. It has low protein binding, 17 to 20%. Hepatic Metabolism:
Ampicillin is 12 to 50% metabolized in the liver. Elimination: renal, 25-60%
unchanged.
The limitation in the case analysis is here, because the effects corresponding to
ampicillin are not specified in the case table.
In cases 6 and 7 : it was administered to an adult individual orally considering different
gastric pHs. We sought to see the concentration of the drug in the plasma in
relation to the minutes that passed until the effect of the drug wore off.
In case 8 : Ampicillin was administered orally at a dose of 500 mg/ml in a patient with
renal failure. Because the elimination routes occur via urine, bile and breast
milk, we can deduce that plasma concentrations of ampicillin will decrease
slowly.
Therefore, in experiment 3, it is evident how the action of drugs works in
different organisms and with different pathologies; taking into account that both
propranolol and ampicillin follow first-order kinetics.
2
0
V.CONCLUSIONS OF THE EXPERIMENTS:
Experiment 1:
Experiment 2
- It is made evident how the action of drugs works, taking into account that
they follow first-order kinetics.
- In case 5 an antiarrhythmic effect could be seen when the concentration
was higher and lower. Among these effects we could see other
consequences of the drug, such as muscle weakness, fatigue,
hypotension and asthma attacks.
- We came to understand the different pharmacokinetic parameters since
the 8 cases were carried out in which we calculated and determined
different values.
2
1
CONCLUSIONS
2
2
VI.BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES
1.Carrillo R, Zavaleta M, Alvarez H, Carillo D, Carrillo C. The importance of
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters in the prescription of
antibiotics [Internet]. 2016 [Cited September 27, 2020]. Available at:
http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/facmed/v56n3/v56n3a2.pdf
2. Beltran B. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics [Internet]. 2015
[Cited on
27 of September of the 2020]. Available in:
https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-
10182004021100008
3. Le J. Drug absorption. MSD Manual [internet]. 2017 [cited ON 26 of
September of the 2020]. Available in:
https://www.msdmanuals.com/es-pe/professional/farmacolog%C3%ADa-
cl%C3%ADnica/farmacocin%C3%A9tica/absorci%C3%B3n-de-los- f
%C3%A1rmacos
4. Díeza T., Bagileta D., Rassettoa M., Lópeza G., Chiganera G., Soldania
L. Strychnine poisoning in a drug addicted patient. Rev. Intensive
medicine, Argentina. [Cited September 27, 2020]. 28(2): 86-88.
Available in:
https://www.medintensiva.org/es-
poisoning-with-strychnine-a-patient-article-13059798
5. Le J. Drug absorption. MSD Manual [internet]. 2017[Cited on
27 of September of the 2020]. Available in:
https://www.msdmanuals.com/es-pe/professional/farmacolog%C3%ADa-
cl%C3%ADnica/farmacocin%C3%A9tica/absorci%C3%B3n-de-los- f
%C3%A1rmacos
6. Medicine administration. Marcos Pharmacy [internet]. 2014 [Cited
September 27, 2020]. Available at: https://farmaciamarcos.es/salud/vias-
de-administracion-de-medicines/
7. Pharmacokinetics: absorption and distribution. Medwave [internet]. 2016
[Cited September 27, 2020]. Available at:
https://www.medwave.cl/link.cgi/Medwave/PuestaDia/Cursos/3449
8. Basic principles of Pharmacology. EUPATI [internet]. 2015 [cited August
9, 2020]. Available at:
https://www.eupati.eu/es/estudios-no-clinicos/principios-basicos-de-
farmacologia/
9. Goodman and Gilman. The Pharmacological Bases of Therapeutics. 12th
edition. Mexico. McGraw Hill Education. 2012.
2
3